Well, I would say that everybody should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence.
— Hillary Clinton, in response to a question about whether her husband’s sexual assault and rape accusers, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey, should be believed.
In recent years, Hillary Clinton has tried to jostle her way into becoming the nation’s premier sexual assault grandstander. For this mantle she faces stiff competition, particularly in the form of perpetual due process haters like Senators Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand. Clinton has told “survivors” (read: accusers) of sexual assault that they have “the right to be believed.” Apparently, though, this right does not extend to those who have previously alleged that her husband Bill sexually harassed or raped them.
Hillary was asked after a recent address whether Bill Clinton accusers Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey should be believed. She responded that women should be believed initially and provided they are not “disbelieved based on evidence.” She then laughed broadly, without stipulating how exactly the allegations against Bill Clinton had been disproven, especially since her husband paid Paula Jones $850,000 in the 1990s to stop pursuing her sexual harassment claim. Ironically, Clinton’s answer came within days of literally thousands of people declaring James Deen a rapist due to tweets and other social media posts.
Cranking up the feminist rhetoric in the lead-up to her 2016 Presidential run, Hillary has attached herself to everything both rape-related and leftwing, from the Mattress Girl debacle to the fabricated 1-in-5 campus sexual assault statistic. The media will happily try to fact-check Donald Trump on matters like New Jersey Muslims allegedly celebrating the 9/11 attacks, but patently fails to give the same attention to a woman who calls for guilty until proven innocent for every man accused of rape, bar her husband.
Why doesn’t the powerful man, vulnerable woman thesis ever apply to Bill Clinton?
If there’s any reason to “disbelieve” Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, and to a lesser extent Kathleen Willey, why isn’t it public knowledge? How do the Clintons benefit from ambiguity?
We constantly hear about how powerful men accused of sexual assault and/or rape, from Bill Cosby to Jian Ghomeshi, supposedly get away with it because of their position, wealth, or fame. Conversely, one is supposed to believe that Bill Clinton’s accusers have fallen away because he is actually innocent. So, in other words, an African-American sitcom star with chronic arthritis is powerful enough to act with impunity for years but the President of the United States wasn’t able to potentially suppress or force his way out of rape allegations?
Clinton’s social and political capital as the most powerful man of the 1990s more than eclipsed any financial or celebrity clout possessed by a middle-aged and then decrepit Bill Cosby. Even when we look at the least credible Clinton accuser, Kathleen Willey, who said Bill fondled her in 1993, it is easy to see her as a “non-perfect victim” in feminist parlance.
Coming up against the most formidable leader in the world, can we really expect she would hold her story together? Remember, Jackie Coakley and Emma Sulkowicz are forgiven by SJWs for massive delays in accusing and blatant changes in their stories, and this is when their falsely accused targets are mere students.
The power game, not justice, is what Hillary Clinton wants
Imagine the outcry if Bill Cosby paid one of his accusers $850,000 to shut up, as Bill Clinton did to placate Paula Jones.
As a well-known lawyer, Hillary Clinton defended a man accused of child rape and she was recorded laughing about the trial later. Then, when she was even older and her husband was campaigning for President, she labeled sexual harassment and rape allegations against her husband as “bimbo eruptions”. Purported slut-shaming and other attempts to undermine women were part of Hillary’s own political toolkit well before she started excoriating so-called misogynists for doing exactly the same thing.
Fundamentally, her desire for rape convictions by social media is designed to win her the crucial backing of the rabid SJWs so accustomed to stealing both the media’s spotlight and bias. Her husband, who has a history of lying about extramarital affairs outside the other criminal accusations, will conveniently have his alleged rape antecedence brushed aside. Meanwhile, men without Bill’s history of overall deceit, including Paul Nungesser, will continue to be crucified in print, on television and online as “rapists”.
Expect the worst when Hillary is elected
A small glimpse of how Hillary will act as President.
For the record, I do not believe Bill Clinton harassed, raped, or sexually assaulted any of these women. If I did, it still wouldn’t remove the onus on his accusers and the state to secure any convictions via the courts. One can only sigh at how Bill Clinton is excused from the SJW mob mentality that literally hunts down and destroys the career prospects and lives of men never found guilty by the system, from Paul Nungesser to the Duke lacrosse team.
We live in a surreal world where the characters of powerless male students are impugned but the most influential members of the left will be afforded all the formal and informal protections of classical liberal jurisprudence. One can be sure that other Democratic political figures have been privately accused of sexual assault or rape but managed to stifle the voices of their accusers.
Is it just me or is the end of 2016 and the likely ascension of Hillary Clinton to the White House going to mark another Brave New World for trials by public opinion?
Read More: In Praise Of Alpha Male Bill Clinton
Don’t give up hope yet. Latest polls show Trump tied with Hillary. Obama was terrible for race relations in the USA and I fear Hillary will do the same for gender relations.
Also….that picture showing a glimpse of how Hillary will act as POTUS is scary. The look of a mad woman.
I think Bill Clinton was objectively a good leader, at least the best of anyone we’ve had in my lifetime. If he were a member of the Republican party, the right would hold him even higher than Reagan, for his successes in balancing the budget, reforming welfare, passing religious protections like the Defense of Marriage Act, and the Religious Freedom Act (upon which the Hobby Lobby health care decision was based), reduction of trade barriers and economic regulations, etc. But since he’s a member of team blue they despise him and tried to bring him down for letting a slutty intern suck his shlong (personally I think few would have the integrity to not bang when you are offered a decades younger vagina).
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28155578
His wife, however, is absolutely terrifying.
I was a little young when ole Bill was in office so I don’t really remember anything other than the Lewinski scandal. I did hear some of his policies set up a lot of problems that Bush faced during his presidency.
One of the biggest was the affirmative action/racist home lending program. Banks had to make bad loans to minorities to get federal money from the federal reserve. Now… granted, the banks found these loans to be profitable. Hey, it’s easy money: Get a 3% interest loan from the feds, loan it to a minority (even high risk) at 7 percent, and then sell off that loan to some suckers at Goldman Sachs or even the Bank of Iceland.
Yeah, a lot of people went nuts with the housing bubble and it’s bigger than Clinton’s racist lending program, but still. He started it off.
Guess who was against Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae buying all the bad loans with taxpayer money? Look it up: GW Bush!
And yet the current Right in the US will never criticize nor permit criticism of Bush the Younger despite the fact he was Obama with a belief in God….
Which Bush? GWB? Is Jeb younger?
In any case, good riddance. Jeb is finished. We both can agree on that and ‘night?
Elaborate that one. Intellectual laziness is the trade mark for retards (aka. “It’s the fault of Bush / Jews / the Elite / the White man, .. ad infinitum).
G W Bush is “Bush the Younger” (the elder is George HW Bush).
Jeb is !Jeb! (or HIllary in drag, has anyone seen them in the same room… 😉 )
Other than ROK, I can’t post a reasonable argument or contention stating that Obama is pretty much a continuation or amplification of the progressive policies implemented by Bush the Younger, excepting the fact Obama doesn’t believe in the Christian God.
Even while Obama is weaker on foreign policy, both Obama and W are Wilsonian interventionists at the end of the day.
Perhaps, but I could not see GWB being this obtuse regarding internal policy. It takes a special kind of idiot (Obama) for that.
I agree that Obama is way more idiotic and extreme on internal policy, but it was Bush that started things like the TSA, signed off on the Patriot Act, and increased the debt beyond his predecessors.
Obama simply has no moral limitations, unlike Bush. But the current Right can’t even admit that. It’s always “Bush believed in God, so he possibly can’t do anything wrong.”
He never balanced the budget and I am sorry to hear you know so little of the Clinton legacy. He screwed the pooch when he purjed himself on the stand. The democrats could not close ranks on that one, hence the impeachment.
It’s funny how the left spins things. As a side observation of leftist spin, I get facebook posts from leftist friends comparing Trump’s proposal to close the borders to Muslims to the WWII internment of Japanese civilians. Hello? Do they know that was done by FDR?
Facts: Clinton did NOT balance the budget. He borrowed from social security to generate a mild “surplus”. And this was in spite of him trying to blow money on hillarycare and free daycare for women. Those initiatives failed because he was too busy defending himself from all of his scandals and various deaths of his “friends.” The Defense of Marriage act he voted twice and was initiated by Republicans (and later, quietly overturned by Obama) and military cuts made by GW Bush a few years earlier (this caused a mild recession in 1991). As Obama will tell you, he doesn’t accept blame for any problems for the first few years of his administration and he has a point but if that’s the case, then how does Clinton get credit for what GW Bush and the Republican congress did?
And no, Clinton didn’t get nailed for merely having sex (more leftist spin) but rather LYING about it. Clinton is a serial liar and couldn’t help himself. PERJURY is a CRIME (so is killing your childhood friend in a local park). Clinton wound up losing his law license because of the CRIME he committed and having to pay Paula Jones because despite CRIMINAL PERJURY, he still LOST. If he was man enough to pay her off from the beginning, this wouldn’t have happened.
In any case, Clinton’s hypocrisy that it’s only “sex” shows the hypocrisy of the left in getting men fired for merely making a fart joke at work. Leftists are scum.
The problem with left/right thinking is you must ignore what’s good or bad, right or wrong, because it all must come down to identity politics. What was done to Japanese civilians must be judged on its own merits, it doesn’t matter whether Stalin loved it (he did) or the fact that FDR was a member of team blue instead of team red (the party positions basically switched in the 60s anyway after the Dixiecrats). Whether W or Obama or Trump wants to lock up Muslims should be analyzed on its own merits, not based on what some dead guy who supposedly belonged to the same group as one of the current leaders, did to a completely different group of people under different circumstances in the past.
They all play games with the numbers but the deficit declined or if you want to argue about it, you could say clearly at least it didn’t worsen under Clinton. The economy was far better in the 90s, and 2000 was the last year that there was a modicum of freedom left in the US. The deficit rocketed under W and took to light speed under Obama. Every guy I know lies about sex, for that matter, all girls lie about it too. I don’t really give a shit who blew him or what color dress she was wearing, and I wouldn’t expect him to talk about it when asked.
The job of the president is that of any CEO – basically just to organize, have competent people report to you, and not to fuck things up. Clinton is not a “leftist” at least as far as one can categorize a person into a false dichotomy of left vs right. He’s more “conservative” than anyone running for president from any party today. He’s no hero like Jefferson or JFK but he did a decent job, more than I can say for anyone since. At the end of the day at least he has a few good things he did during his leadership, pointed out above, which isn’t true for any president since. You don’t have to like him but he’s the only living president who didn’t fuck up the economy. I do like Trump’s lack of PC and populism and I don’t think he’d fuck up the economy either, although democracy and voting are bullshit and I’d be very surprised if they don’t find a way to get Jeb in there, just watch and see.
Yep, 2000 was peak america(double peak if you include 1972).
Its a wrap, kiddies- China got into the WTO in 2002, bleeding jobs ever since(we shed 35,000 jobs a month for 4 or 5 years once they got in).
No recovery in sight…
I agree the deficit lessoned under Clinton but his “surplus” is arguable. If I pay off my credit cards with a new credit card, have I paid off my credit cards? But yeah, it was a combination of factors including one that Clinton deserves credit for: Raising the top income tax rate. New revenues did flow in, at least during his administration. The USA is now seeing many corporations go offshore and losing tax revenue due to that trend but at the time, he made a lot of money from it for the treasury. As you know, the welfare reform act is a Republican congress initiative he signed off on but wasn’t enthusiastic about until after his presidency. And the economy went well due to the tech bubble which burst just after GWB came into office.
Agreed about the awfulness of GWB and his spending.
I don’t lie about sex much personally. I have a healthy attitude about it.
Having been around at the time of Clinton, and read his positions and listened to his speeches, he did attempt to sound moderate to fool (successfully) the middle class voters alienated by GHB’s lies on “read my lips, no new taxes” as well as FDR style economic populism. He and Hillary tried to pass a form of Hillarycare (but flopped), paid daycare for feminists (again, flopped), and numerous other leftist stuff. What Obama deserves credit for, sort of, is doing what Hillary and Bill failed to do: Pass the monster that is Obamacare. In a way, it’s a good thing because if you hate socialism, at least let the left pass a form of it that stinks that few will like.
Here’s the thing: Clinton is like the weatherman: If the weather is good, everyone likes him. My wife also liked the Bresznev era in Soviet politics because she was young at the time and has fond memories of the era but she doesn’t think that Bresznev was a “good” guy.
Regarding left/right. I agree that these need to be realigned. The left are a bunch of corrupt, racist douchebags. The right are a bunch of corrupt, er, douchebags. But at least they don’t hate whites and men like the left does. That’s not enough for me to get out of bed and vote for them each time though. Fair enough?
Bush was terrible but Clinton would have been also if not for a Republican congress keeping him in check (why do you think Obama has been semi ok? nothing has been passed since Republicans took over congress). He (clinton) also got very lucky with timing with the dotcom boom, y2k spending, and the biggest stock market bubble since 1929. Clinton was better than Obama though because he was able to (begrudgingly) work with Republicans and their 1994 contract with America. In 1992-1993, the Clintons tried to cram more and more spending down the tube.
Well said.
False and I wish people would stop propagating this myth because it’s untrue. LBJ is quoted to have said “I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” Is this not the case today?
Here’s a Malcolm X quote from around the same time period:
Is this not still true today?
LBJ is the primary reason for the switch, hence it being such a big deal that he would be getting “those niggers voting Democratic”… No southern state had elected a republican to office since the 1800s.. some took as long as the late 1990s to elect their first. The swap is now fully complete. The south is fully Republican now.
Come on dude, he was a “great president” purely due to dumb luck- he blundered into the tech bubble! If Hoover became prez in 1993, he’d be heralded as one of the greatest too!
nah…hoover sucked….get it…hoover. HA!
rimshot
Negative. AWB, NAFTA?
FUCK NO.
Unfortunately, I think Trump will pull out towards the end. He has made millions of dollars in sponsorship dollars, even one of the least popular Republican candidates can expect to walk away with decent cash. Trump has raked it in.
Shame if he does though. Cruz just doesn’t have the charisma.
Nothing new. As in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, the laws only apply for the little guy, not the elites. This article only proves that America is not a democracy, which btw was confirmed by Jimmy Carter, former president.
Can you elaborate on Carter’s discovery?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/jimmy-carter-is-correct-t_b_7922788.html
Oh, I vaguely remember reading this. Foreigners have a better understanding of the US political system than Americans do because massive pronouncements like this are glossed over by our 6 media outlets. He’s right about the oligarchy, of course.
It is getting far more blatant than even the articles here let on. When you get the chance look up what the wealthy have been doing in Chicago in relation to tax laws.
New York Times has been talking about the wealthy working angles to decide Puerto rico’s fate, to instill a new tax system specifically for the wealthy, multi-million dollar palaces popping up in Los Angeles with shell owners, Wall Street taking away loans from Fannie and Freddie to name a few.
Feminism is only one head on this beast and the destruction is speeding up.
“New York Times has been talking about the wealthy working angles to decide Puerto rico’s fate”
I dunno, is there any truth to this? I havent trusted anything they might publish since their “Whats wrong with boys wearing dresses?” article 3 or 4years ago…
Yep, did you know the wealthy can now purchase a US passport, just like you can in a handful of banana republics? You can’t even do that in any first or second world country I know of. But you can in the USA!
http://www.voanews.com/content/foreign-investors-buy-their-way-to-us-citizenship/1737041.html
Nope what you talking about is jew america,law was enforced at that time in Germany.
Not really. If you were a jew in Nazi Germany, but an important one(like Fieldmarshall Milch), Hitler would leave you alone and not send to a concentration camp. Dictatorships are always hypocritical, this is why feminists hate freedom of speech and freedom in general – they want A MONOPOLY on freedom. Freedom for themselves, but prosecution for everybody else.
The Nuremberg Laws were primarily designed to remove Jews from where they had power over Germans and could spread destructive ideologies; They were removed from main stream newsprint (but could have their own publications, Teaching at universities, Law and of course their banking was no longer welcome.
The laws applied to those greater than 1/4 Jewish ie one Jewish grandparent meant one was not automatically jewish. They were abrogated for WW1 veterans, especially winners of the Iron Cross.
The could be abrogated by Hitler and Reichsmarschall Goering by administrative decree. Obviously Erhard Milch(head of Luftwaffe) and also Maurice Emile.(Hitlers Jewish Friend)
Those videos of book burnings were probably from the Institute of Sexicology which was regarding as promoting sexual perversion, homosexuality.
lol one dimensionality
You know the credit card industry was deregulated in the final year of his presidency? Great article about this in Harper’s a few years ago…
dont disparage nazi germany negro knight.
fuck off white nationalist troll
oy vey shut it down
Hillary is the ideal wife for an accused rapist. When she was an attorney before she got into politics, she represented a child rapist and coached him on how to beat a polygraph test, and got his sentenced reduced. She was recorded laughing about it in an interview. Why don’t the feminists and SJWs unleash a social media storm against her?
Would she laugh if the child had been her daughter? Why is it funny when children get raped? Answer the question Hillary supporters.
As much as I dislike Hillary, I don’t find it damning. She doesn’t say she coached him, only that he passed the polygraph when he shouldnt have(so maybe she believed he was guilty?). And lawyers like doctors laugh about grave situations, because that is what they deal with every day. I mean, even the interviewer is laughing. Interesting how strong her accent is here, which she has completely eliminated in politics.
There are ways for an attorney, even a public defender, to recuse oneself from representing a client for all kinds of reasons. Hillary took the case, knowing the client was guilty, and did everything she could to put a rapist back on the street as quickly as possible. Then smugly chuckled about her success afterwards. Again would she be able to casually laugh about it if the 12 year old girl had been Chelsea?
Probably.
Probably, most politicians aren’t actually human.
Guess this makes Hillary a rape apologist. Maybe it will trend on twitter.
Women are starting to find out that society has granted them the power to destroy any mans life, even benefiting financially from it.
No proof is necessary since no one has the attention span to actually investigate, they simply read a tweet about someone being a rapist and that mans life is ruined for good. Doesn’t matter how much evidence exists against it since no one has the mental faculties to read anything above 140 characters. Besides, no one will dare go against the witch hunt, they might end up on the stake themselves.
This is the new dark ages.
I remember that a prominent feminist reported, durung the Monica Lewinsky circus, that she wanted to perforn fellation on Bill Clinton because he kept abortion legal. I guess killing babies is more important that bringing harrasers to justice, I, for one, do believe that Clinton was guilty some of the charges against him, since they fodun the DNA evidence on Monica’s dress. That means he lied.
cause jews like to kill goyim babies and exclaim later on that we need that immigration because of low birth rates…uhmmm
topest kek
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Burleigh
In a 1998 essay for Mirabella, Burleigh described an occasion aboard Air Force One when she noticed President Bill Clinton apparently looking at her legs, the piece led to her being described as “the Ally McBeal of former White House reporters” by columnist Ellen Goodman. Approached by a Washington Post media reporter to discuss the Mirabella article, Burleigh made on-the-record-remarks commending Clinton’s policy on abortion rights that were widely considered the most sexually explicit ever made by a premier journalist. Referring to the comment in a 2007 piece for The Huffington Post, Burleigh wrote, “I said it (back in 1998, but a good quote has eternal life) because I thought it was high time for someone to tweak the white, middle-aged beltway gang taking Clinton to task for sexual harassment. These men had neither the personal experience nor the credentials to know sexual harassment when they saw it, nor to give a good goddamn about it if they did. The insidious use of sexual harassment laws to bring down a president for his pro-female politics was the context in which I spoke.”
You could say that Clinton was brought down by the kinds of ‘liberal’ laws his side of politics promoted and he played up to.
Bill was an alpha, perhaps out of need to satisfy himself because his wife is a rug muncher who wears pants suits.
Trump is an alpha but he marries his women and produces children. From an evolutionary point of view that is true alpha.
Bill and Hillary are a political alliance first, a marriage second. It was from when they first met.
Democrats divide and conquer because their policies are nothing but failures.
That and
1) The progressives hate the country, the nationalists and the conservatives love the country. Since those who love the least have the most power, the progressives have the most power over their opposition.
2) The progressives are united in their fervor, while their opposition is divided.
3) The progressives will crawl over broken glass to achieve their ends, and the conservatives do not have the corresponding willingness for their convictions.
Hence the progressives will always win (or at least achieve a leftward shift).
As long as you are a champion of the Narrative (whatever it is), you will be given a pass for pretty much everything you do.
Look at the SJWs in the SciFi world. Bunch of child molesters in their midst and still think that right wingers are worse.
I’m still sticking with Cosby being innocent. I don’t deny he had a sexual relationship with those women, but rape? Nope. That’s how it starts now. An accusation leads to a settlement, a settlement is an admission of guilt in the eyes of the public. Women are turning men into rapist by default. You can’t even defend yourself. Its either you did or you did it.
Agreed. I don’t mean to sound cruel, but even if you were raped 20 or 30 years ago, at this point one would assume you have moved on. Rape is horrible, but if something traumatic happened to me that long ago, and I hadn’t come to terms with it yet, forgotten it, forgiven, or whatever, then that’s my own fault. A lot of bad shit happens to a lot of people, and they mourn, adjust their lives, and move on. This stinks of opportunism and I don’t believe a word of it.
Even if it were true, if one of these girls who met Cosby at a Playboy party woke up the next day and someone told her Cosby banged her while she was drunk and stoned out of her mind (and if we accept the feminist definition that this is rape), how upsetting is that really to her, considering a girl in those circumstances, who goes to Hugh Hefner’s house and meets guys alone one on one in their bedroom, has almost certainly had hundreds of other Hollywood cocks as she sleeps her way to the top to get work?
literally 100% of people who were in their late teens to early 30’s were banged while drunk and stoned out of their minds in the 70’s. Every. Single. One. And more then once. It was like all the time. All of them.
Yet we’re suppose to accept the fact that when a women has a drink or two, it means she was drugged. It has nothing to do with her consuming an alcoholic beverage and poppin’ pills on her own volition.
Funny. One of the women said Cosby gave her pills and they continued to have a sexual relationship for yrs. Cosby pulled some jedi mind tricks everytime he banged a, broad.
I’ve seen how memory works and its very scary. Complete memories are reconstructed on the basis of fragments of memory that become influenced by contamination with other experiences.
Most people are nevertheless reliable but its surprising how many people have memories that are just made up.
A C list celebrity drinking booze, taking drugs and having sex with an A list celebrity is not rape…it’s just called entertainment biz…..for that matter…take out “celebrity” and it is still valid and, you can even take out the ratings and it is still just called the 70’s
Cosby was raped by a bunch of stoned, drunken bimbos who hoped he’d gratefully aid their attempted careers in the entertainment industry. Now, embarrassed in their old age and encouraged by the left and insane feminists, they try to make money off their crimes.
Just as they ignored OJ and ignore Moslem rape gangs molesting white girls in England and other places they cover for Bill Clinton. These clowns are more interested in our Society’s destruction not for ‘Social Justice’ it is all Politics of Common Cause over real concerns for real women or anything or anybody else.
Besides, no way Cosby can defend himself decades later. No one is going to be able to come forward and say “Oh yeah, March 22, 1992? Yeah I remember Stacy being completely sober at 6:05 PM and laughing while she led Cosby back to the bedroom… she came back out at 6:50 twirling her panties around her head”. Likely he’s not even friends with any of those people anymore…
If anything these women should be suing the accuser of the oldest incident allegedly involving Cosby. This accuser’s NOT going to the police or pursuing of criminal charges against Cosby could have allowed a possible serial rapist to continue victimizing people.
If Trump wins the GOP nomination for President, and Hillary wins the Democrat nomination, then I will be doing everything in my power to spread articles such as this around to possibly sway more folks to vote Trump.
I know that by simply offering more free stuff, and because “muh vagina”, Hillary will win many female and minority voters; but, I think if it can be hammered home that Hillary protected a serial player, womanizer, and *potential* abuser, then her aura of “strong and independent” can be shattered and her opinions on the “war on womynz” will become null and void.
Believe it or not, a lot of women like Trump. A majority of white women vote Republican. Being white and voting Democrat is like being a rabbit and voting wolf. Married women also tend to vote Republican (since Democrats hate whites and men and especially a combination of the two.)
Let’s review, also, that Obama hasn’t delivered what he promised and a lot of young people are disillusioned. Millennials getting a college degree are finding a shortage of jobs. Obama promised amnesty for the illegals and hasn’t been able to provide it. Many of them have lived here for 10 years in the shadows and they’re angry about it. Hispanics who aren’t illegals live in neighborhoods blighted by illegal gang bangers.
Yes, the race and feminist demographics of the left gives them a huge advantage but… there are still plenty of others out there to vote against them.
And keep in mind that the electorate of the left is not necessarily united very well. Hillary is a white woman in a party of increasingly Hispanic, Jewish, Islamic, African American, and gays. Imagine trying to hold a political rally for all of the above at a mosque…
Everything you say is perfectly logical.
Unfortunately the people you are saying it about are not.
I don’t see blacks voting for hillary even if obama campaigns for her. The enthusiasm level is going to be down. Many will just be too busy to vote. Hillary is all about the ‘women’ vote. She is very one dimensional.
Many blacks stayed home in 2010 and especially in 2014. That’s why the GOP made the gains it did in both elections.
Blacks too busy to vote? They seem to have plenty of time for producing illegitimate kids, drugs, drive-by shootings, and similar anti-social activities.
I am of the wishful (and hopeful) thinking that the past 7 years of nakedly caustic racial politicking may have succeeded in turning off working class whites to voting Democrat.
Without this vote, the Democrat party cannot win.
The psat 7 years? The left has been hating whites since the 1960’s and even quietly before then. I refer to this phenominon as “The Archie Bunker” paradigm. Ever see the classic (leftist) show “All in the Family?” Archie Bunker is portrayed as a bigoted, stupid white working class man living in suburban NYC and working at the docks. The left tore him to pieces on the show but the show’s popularity was similar to the Trump phenominon: Despite Bunker being portrayed as stupid, and strawman right wing positions being put into his mouth, the audience liked him and what he had to say. Even if you build a strawman and put your opposition’s positions into it in the worst possible way, that doesn’t make good arguments bad.
Archie Bunker’s backstory is that he was working class and supported a wife and daughter. Yeah, he was the ultimate jerk most of the time but he worked 10 hours a day and “meathead”, his liberal son-in-law, lived under his roof like the rest of them. Without Archie, all of them would have starved to death and he deserved, and demanded, credit for that. Archie probably FDR a mere 20 years before and the party of the left revealed their intentions (wanting worldwide communism to take over) and Archie left like many working class men and, “meathead” wanted him to go down.
Archie Bunker, despite being portrayed as stupid, was “smart”. He saw the left for what it was years before most other working class whites (or men) woke up.
You will never win points with Dem women putting down Bill. You could have video of him draining childrens blood and making roofied jello shots out of it, feeding the jello shots to the mothers of the newly dead children and then anally raping them and it would not sway a single female dem voter away from the Clintons.
Haha! I’m inclined to agree on the Dem women.
I should be more specific when I say “women voters”. I’m more-so referring to Independents and registered Republican women. Some of these women will probably vote for Clinton simply because “muh vagina” and “muh womynz health”, but I think Trump has a chance to snag many Independent and registered Republican women over Clinton. This is based off the fact that Trump seems to currently be doing much better with Independents.
Trump has a certain “protector” quality and “alpha male” quality about him. Our worthless MSM makes many of his policies sound “drastic” and “racist” (such as a temporary Moslem ban, deporting illegals, and building a wall), but really they are just common sense measures, and it’s likely that many white women will vote Trump instinctively for the protection he will provide (or *try* to provide).
Also, many inner city blacks (believe it or not) will support Trump due to the fact that illegal Mexicans have really impacted their way of life. This conflict has even carried over into prisons, where gang warfare between blacks and Mexicans is becoming increasingly common and more violent.
Correct. I would also throw in that Clinton’s biggest base, white women, isn’t polling as high as it should be and every time she open’s her mouth, she drops hence you do not hear Hillary to often unless it is a controlled press release. As the election nears, she is going to have to expose herself more and the more people will see her “wonderful charisma.”
“Also, many inner city blacks (believe it or not) will support Trump due
to the fact that illegal Mexicans have really impacted their way of
life.”
Nope. The knuckle-draggers will vote 90% Democrat, as always.
“Also, many inner city blacks (believe it or not) will support Trump due to the fact that illegal Mexicans have really impacted their way of life.”
Nope. The knuckle-draggers will vote 90% Democrat, as always.
That’s largely the crux of it: he is a Democrat and perceived as supporting feminism. I don’t know how Bill Cosby votes, but he gained a reputation for extolling a lot of conservative values: but now in additional to being rapist he is a hypocrite. On the other hand, everyone knows that Clinton is a horndog lying sack of shit but Democrats simply don’t care.
.
I have no idea what to think of the Ghomeshi allegations.
Here’s some more for your spreading of Hillary Hate.
LOOK THESE UP IN THE BOOKS AND PAGE NUMBERS CITED IF YOU WISH. EIGHT QUOTES FROM DIFFERENT BOOKS
Her actual words:
1) “Where is the God damn flag? I want the God damn fucking flag up every morning at fucking sunrise”. Hillary to staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day 1991. From the book “Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244
(2) “Fuck off! It’s enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day! I’m not going to talk to you, too! Just do your Goddamn job and keep your mouth shut.” Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with “Good Morning.” From the book “America Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p.90
(3) “If you want to remain on this detail, get your fucking ass over here and grab those bags!” Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident. From the book “The First Partner” p. 25
(4) “Stay the fuck back, stay the fuck back away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else! Just fucking do as I say, Okay!!?” Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail. From the book “Unlimited Access” by Clinton ‘s FBI Agent-in-Charge, Gary Aldridge, p.139
(5) “Where’s the miserable cock sucker?” (otherwise known as “Bill Clinton”) Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer. From the book “The Truth about Hillary” by Edward Klein, p. 5
(6) “You fucking idiot” Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event. From the book “Crossfire” ~pg. 84
(7) “Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those fucking sunglasses! We need to go back!†Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while in route to Air Force One. From the book ” Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72
(8) “Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can’t fuck her here!!” Hillary to Gov. Bill Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female. From the book “Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 243
There it is ……..book, chapter and page…….the real Hillary Rotten Clinton!
Additionally, when she walked around the White House, NO ONE was permitted to look her in the eye, they all had to lower their heads with their eyes towards the ground whenever she walked by. Clearly she is a class act!
This ill-tempered, violent, loud-mouth, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your next President, and have total control as Commander-in-Chief of our Military, the very Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life .
Remember her most vile comment about Benghazi: “What difference at this point does it make?”
Now it will be clear why the crew of “Marine One” helicopter nick-named the craft, “Broomstick ONE ”
This was copied and pasted from a Facebook post I came across. Sorry for spelling/gramma errors mate.
Hillary had low favorability rating in arkansas her home state. She didn’t think she could get elected to the senate there. That’s why she relocated to new york state where the feminist vote is more shrill at silencing alternative opinion.
I think it was actually Illinois….and the term for what she did by jumping ship and coming to New York is carpet muncher. Or something like that but she is definitely a carpet muncher.
The term is carpetbagger. Ironically it was used in the South first post Civil War to describe Northeners coming down during Reconstruction.
NY was the only state in the Union you could run for Senate without being a resident.
It was known in political circles during Bill’s presidency, that Hitlery wanted to run for president. Unfortunately for her, the opportunity was in 2008 and that ship sailed with Barry. I do not see her making it next year and her internal polls will be telling her handlers exactly that.
describe Northeners coming down and exploiting the fuck out of the impoverished natives during Reconstruction.
FIFY
Every one of Cosby’s alleged “rape victims” have all the hallmarks of making false rape claims. Where are the police reports? Where are the criminal charges? Where is the rape kit evidence? Why has Cosby never been arrested? Why wait several years before saying something? I’m sure these women give the typical bullshit excuse of “I was too ashamed/scared to go to the police” as justification for their inaction in reporting the crime, but I’m not buying it. What I do see is a series of jaded sluts who are attempting to use both the legal system and mob “justice” to extract the money they’re “owed” from Cosby that their pussies couldn’t get from him when they willingly offered it to him.
I don’t really see any double standards here. Bill is about to become the First Lady, so protection from all SJWs is to be expected.
“For the record, I do not believe Bill Clinton harassed, raped, or sexually assaulted any of these women…”
“Is it just me or is the end of 2016 and the likely ascension of Hillary Clinton to the White House going to mark another Brave New World for trials by public opinion?”
I understand the author’s point of view and level headed thinking; HOWEVER, this is war. With Trump, we may finally have a chance to turn things around in this country, and I’ll be dammed if I sit around and give people like the Clintons the “benefit of the doubt” when it comes to innocence and guilt.
In the case of Hillary and Bill, I don’t give a damn if either one receives fair treatment by our legal system or American citizens. They are both sick people and neither one should be allowed any influence in politics. These two have been working against our interests for years. They are both globalist puppets.
We need to spread the word that Hillary protected a suspected rapist and chronic womanizer. We must use this as a weapon to defeat Clinton this election cycle.
From what i ve read Hillary is the rapist.Hillary will mean war with Russia and China and civil war at home.
“For the record, I do not believe Bill Clinton harassed, raped, or sexually assaulted any of these women…”
Then you are a poor judge of character. Bill was the white trailer trash “rascle” he always was. If you spent some time near one, you would recognize his BS from a mile away. I don’t blame him for knocking young poon which his position allowed him as his wife is an affirmed dyke. It’s was known during his presidency in DC and abroad, but I know a guy who worked on the SS detail who affirmed it.
Know a guy who knows a guy (maybe I’m missing a guy?) who used to supply Clinton with his daily hydro. Back in the Arkansas days, whenever the door opened to receive mail, wafts of weed would flow out like a mist. He also had many female visitors. If he can do that in a public office I doubt he could really care less if he grabbed some chicks tits or worse.
I do not doubt it. Two Arkansas troopers made the mistake of admitting bringing prostitutes up to the govenors mansion when he was running for POTUS in 92′. Their traps went shut when they were threatened. The Clintons are sociopathic opportunists with a sham marriage. Despite that, I still think Bill never hated the country the way Hitlery and Obama do. The old dyke will do nothing but drag us down further into the pit.
The guy youre missing has been missing for years 🙂
I honestly dont have the patience or stomach for feminist hipocracy anymore. I feel like I’ve been worn down by all the bullshit.
The Clinton era was surreal. I remember reading at the time, when Ron Brown’s plane crashed with nearly a hundred other souls aboard, that the technician in charge of the radar of the local airport has “committed suicide via a shot in the chest” and the plane went off course, supposedly, even with radar. A flight attendant who survived the crash for more than a day died on the helicopter ride back to the airport. I’m reminded of the line in Judge Dredd: “there were no survivors of this plane crash! [bang bang bang!]”
Clinton’s childhood friend was shot in the head and lay in a local park in a position not consistent with suicide. The number of people who meet with “accidents” connected to the Clinton’s is staggering.
I’m reminded of the character Tony Soprano. A mobster who killed several people on the run of the show including his childhood friends and lived for adrenaline rush: Drugs, women, attention. He’s a sociopath similar to Clinton. What is amazing to me is that after leaving office, largely nothing has happened. Shouldn’t Bill still be getting into trouble? Why is there no trail of dead hookers behind him over the past few decades? How did he go from THAT to being effectively a househusband of Hillary? Did his weiner fall off from all those diseases he’s gotten over the years?
For Bill Clinton to have been prosecuted for any of his in-office shenanigans would have set bad precedent for future presidents.
It is for this reason that 0bama never pursued criminal charges against Bush as his leftist base has wanted.
Clinton had his in-office shenanigans covered up while he was in office (and quite effectively, I must admit.) What criminal charges against Bush? Going to war in Iraq for WMD after Bill Clinton had said they were there? Yeah, good luck with that Obama. The left were sore loser crybabies after Bush won in Y2K but they didn’t have a case.
And also another reason the establishment is shitting itself on the prospect of Trump becoming president — because he has no connection to that “tradition”.
Without reading the article, the answer to the question is Hillary’s influence. She married Bill to rise politically. She must be protected.
Its a glaring contradiction amongst SJW, but here we are.
“Vote for Hilarity, she has a Vagina and she can use it”
In all fairness I think we should accept that Bill was an alpha male. A womanizer and a man’s man. Definetely not the worst president.
Your standard for Alpha is pretty low. He was a con artist who got lucky with his schtick.
He was a manufactured candidate, just like Obama, to fit a profile to get the vote. The Kennedy comparison was non-stop and the Boomers fell for it. Ross Perot helped split the vote to get him the margin he needed.
I was mildly joking when I said he was alpha. He certainly had more balls than an average Joe tho. As for being manufactured – well, according to Alex Jones all presidents since JFK are puppets.
JFK was rich, a pill popping frat boy who simply was out of his depth. LBJ was a douche even further out…the white Obama. Nixon… Watergate was a joke as he is responsible for alot worse. Ford. meh. Carter… an apparition of everything wrong with the 70’s. I think the anomoly was Regean, but that is never going to happen again and it’s been further down hill since.
Bill Clinton was a mangina who wifed up a shrew and sold out other men for the feminist vote. Bill actually encouraged Hillary to campaign for him saying she was going to be co-president. John Kennedy was an alpha male.
I am glad the author made sure to mention that he doesn’t believe that the rape and harassment charges against Clinton are true and even if he did he would want the burden of proof to be met by the accusers. I know Clinton is no fan fav here, but I don’t think there are many people here denying that women basically get in line for a good slick willy.
I think it shows that the people here are of a much different moral caliber than the people who detest them.
I tend to notice that if you are hated by a certain segment of this population then they will just believe anything you are accused of where as here the point is made with deference to the fact that like him or not, Bill isn’t a rapist.
When you are the strongest poltical figure in the world (and in the 90’s the US was a hyper-power), you will have legions of women lining up (hypergamy).
Europeans were laughing about Monika Lewinsky. Not because Bill shoved a cigar up her ass, but because he was exposed for banging such an ugly chick.
Monica Lewinsky was the chubby girl at college that never got sex unless the male was wearing beer goggles, and was then avoided the morning after by the guy who denied knowing her to his male friends.
Monica Lewinsky is a solid 6. She had a much more feminine face than most of the modern western women.
Agreed. I even gave her a low 7. I like busy women and she also seemed to smile.
Later on, she went on to be a more or less “normal” (in a bad way) western woman going to university, getting advanced degrees, but otherwise not developing her personal life whatsoever.
Maybe she’s solid 6 if you are a 60 y/o male who has to fuck Hillary.
Lol, do you ever get laid?
WHAT? Lewinsky is a 6? Unless that is Pork Fried Rice at your Chinese place I don’t know what you are talking about.
I only consider Marilyn Monroe a 7 and that includes makeup and money. Lewinsky is barely fucking human.
Bill and Hill would get into bed and pretend each other was a different woman.
Best comment ever.
Just because she is a little chubby, doesn’t mean you have to shave off lots of points. She is a 5. I gave her an extra point for feminine face. Makes a six. Yes she was fuckable back in the day. You just got desensitized by porn.
No, I remember her from back in the day and would have no idea what she looks like now. Also, not a porn fan.
She was disgusting. She doesn’t just lose points for being a fatty, for her style, for her big mouth, for her snotty attitude…but just in general for being disgusting.
She looked like every fat chick who hung out with the fag theater majors. The queers told her she was beautiful and then she got drunk at parties and some idiot at 4 am would eventual stick something into that wadded up used mound of bubble yum she probably called a cunt.
Fat Tits DO NOT EQUAL Big Tits.
When will people learn.
The main thing I learned from Lewinski is that a girl will sell you out no matter what. If this was one of your buddies, and some perv DC lawyer said hey I want you to come tell us everything you know about your buddy Bill and where he puts his dick, I’d tell them to fuck off (if they intimidated me it would probably be something like “I don’t recall” or “my memory is really bad” but still, the principle stands).
This girl was infatuated with Clinton, but still, when the press came around, she couldn’t wait to tell them all sorts of tabloid details. This all comes down to game. Now, in Clinton’s defense, he didn’t really have a relationship with this girl, she was just there, flashed her thong, and went for the cock, but do you think any of Pablo Escobar’s bitches ever opened their mouths? If you’re serious with a woman, it is absolutely imperative that you make her completely loyal to you.
There were no witnesses, so she was the only one who could say whether this really happened or not. Girls lie all the time and it would have been believable if she said nothing ever went down, but I exaggerated to my coworkers to appear cool.
She’s clearly a 6+ by 2015 standards.. back in the 90s she was pretty ugly.
I’m going to have to disagree. A lot wrong with 2015 world but the sheer amount of hairless 22 year old 110 pound hard bodies puts her out of bone contention unless you live in a wallmart
One of the challenges of many players on RoK is that they will get rejected. What the evidence (and final settlement of the Jones vs Clinton lawsuit) shows is that Clinton didn’t like getting rejected or even worse, put in place by a woman. He could have paid Jones off or even apologized rather than dragging out the lawsuit, committing perjury (not just once but several times. His videotaped deposition is used as a training tool for forensics lie detector analysts). We don’t know for sure he’s a rapist, but he clearly was a sociopath and sexual addict.
This is a good reminder for RoK readers in that if you get your “game” going and seduce and sleep with dozens of women and engage in some sleazy behavior, it will affect your overall reputation.
The best indacator to predict behavior is to examine how the person responded in the past in similiar circumstances.
What disgusted me the most regaring the error of Bill Clinteon was the narrative being accepted by the public that a person’s personal life shouldn’t be used to judge their professional. I heard this from people I actually respected. The last time I heard it, I told the Senior Manager that it was BS. I person’s ethical behavoir doesn’t change no matter public or private setting. If a man steals from his inlaws and is exposed, would you be concerned as a shareholder if the same guy was your CEO? He will betray his wife, the person he supposedly loves, why do you think he won’t f*ck you over?
My political (dis)beliefs were shaped by how Clinton became president. A con man will con, but the amount of willingly dupes was sureal.
But with Clinton, this wasn’t just a “personal” matter but rather a severe abuse of power that Anita Hill had exaggerated against her former mentor, and benefactor, Clarence Thomas.
Let’s review for a moment that just a few years before the Jones’ incident, Anita Hill accused Thomas of making jokes about a porn video and hitting on her. He didn’t do anything illegal such as showing his schlong or threatening her like Clinton did to Hill. And note, this is what Hill CLAIMED. It’s possible something happened but probably a lot less severe than even that.
Feminists argue that men in power shouldn’t use their authority to try to extort sex from women which is what Clinton did. Clinton had his security team escort her to a hotel room, alone with him, and then threatened her if she talked. This is not just harassment but even criminal behavior. As governor, he could have state troopers start harassing herself, her relatives, or even harm them. And supposedly, many say he did just that.
Later on, the accusations of rape and murder that he committed (allegedly) in the white house are similar to what he was accused of while in the governor’s office. Banging Lewinski only became a factor because this was a technicality from him lying about it in court. Yeah, that’s not a big deal. Then again, nobody says Nixon ordered a burglary at watergate to plant bugs in a DNC headquarter. The scandal is in the coverup.
It’s called character assassination. American black, latino and female conservatives who run for public office get eviscerated by the leftist press and their followers. The Stalinist “Annita Hill Hearings” regarding Clarence Thomas was one of my wake up calls.
Not just Europeans.
Between her and the others you would think that Clinton was trying to bang a 10 but spread it out over 5 2’s.
He was so popular that one girl who was like a super Clinton fan actually asked me to put a cigar in her one night when she was super fucked up. Like, she wanted to know what that was like.
I just am happy that the folks here are made of better stuff.
Yikes. The Clinton fandom was bizarre, but those left of the bell curve were receptive to his BS.
I can’t believe ROK’s admin banned me for this comment.
https://disqus.com/home/discussion/returnofkings/why_homosexual_marriage_matters_for_straight_men/#comment-2427860816
You can’t take criticism, neoboys? Gee, so fragile!
Hillary is running for being president, bill is her husband, both are rich leftists, do you need more explanations ?
Bill Clinton, former US President and could possibly be the first US First Man (opposite of First Lady) or First Husband? What do you call it? Is that title something to be proud of?
Still first lady
LOL! Good one!
First mangina.
No, considering that he was president and now his wife running to be. Things like this do happen…in other countries that, a long time ago, we’re more corrupt then us. Elsewhere we have other countries that elect father then son and then another son. They’re called monarchies. So, Husband and possibly wife and Father and son and, very unlikely, another son? I think people are catching on. Jeb is fucking out, period. Trump isn’t just continuing to grow, this is a man that can say the most politically incorrect things and see his ratings go up. I don’t know, but, the establishment should be shitting its pants. Also, heard a rumor that Jim Webb might run as third party, which would destroy the democrats. Go Jim!
Electing wives, children and other relations happens all the time in third world countries.
Why don’t we combine his titles as First Ex-President and First Husband to First Ex-Husband.
I am loving all these people fighting for Monica Lewinsky’s honor. It’s more than she ever did for it.
Monica Lewinsky is the best thing that could have happened to Mrs. Bill Clinton. No one helps to garner more sympathy for the latter than discussion of the former.
Aside from the obvious fact that Clinton is “one of them”, it should also be mentioned that women used rape and grievances in general as a way to garner unearned social empathy and status
blaming Clinton just doesn’t serve those purposes
For the record, I DO believe Bill Clinton harassed, raped, or sexually assaulted ALL of these women.
Bill had a sham marriage and had affairs and approached lots of other women who weren’t receptive to his advances. Was he a rapist… probably by the current feminist standard he would be guilty… but then what’s the current feminist standard? If she had 2.5 drinks she can’t give consent? If you didn’t use condom? First date sex? I think the point is feminists selectively use the rape charge. Its the hypocrisy of the selective outrage. Hillary is a feminist fraud. She’s the one running for office now, not Bill.
Not ‘or’, but ‘and’
There were many, many more accusers going back to Bill’s days at Oxford. The three mentioned in this article are just the only ones that got any media attention.
Bill Clinton is the similiar to the soviet serial killer Andrei Chikatilo. His party membership excused him of suspicion allowing him to continue his crimes.
Party trumps humans.
Clinton’s signing of the Violence Against Women Act (arguably one of the most anti-male pieces of legislation ever passed) gave him a free pass for life from any criticism by the feminist left.
Duplicity, inconsistency and dishonesty have always been in the leftist playbook. This shouldn’t be surprising.
That have no principals. They’ll do and say whatever it takes to stay and power and push everyone else down.
Funny how they act like women with BPD.
They manipulate others as a matter of course, everything is about emotional displays and control. Never satisfied, and nothing is ever enough. Pushing their policies further and further into the fringes and still being unhappy.
Same with the leftoid men, it’s like high estrogen levels make dudes act like chicks with BPD.
“Purported slut-shaming and other attempts to undermine women were part of Hillary’s own political toolkit well before she started excoriating so-called misogynists for doing exactly the same thing.”
It goes a lot further than that, the cunt Hillary also ordered the IRS to audit the women who credibly accused Clinton of sexual assault and rape as well as sent thugs to terrorize them for being a threat to her reign of terror. And yes, Juanita Broaddrick did credibly accuse Bill Clinton of rape because NBC declined to publish her account of rape until after his impeachment was concluded. But the Rolling Stone didn’t hesitate to publish the lies of an obviously lying rancid sociopath. The media was clearly in the bag for the incurably corrupt Clintons, crawling up under Bill and Hillary and riding their nuts.
I don’t give a fuck if any of these men groped any of those women.
What bothers me is Hillary Clinton, a lawyer and presidential candidate, saying accusers should be believed until disproved with evidence. That means that she doesn’t believe in the presumption of innocence. Therefore she is a fucking communist and should be exterminated.
Communist and jew are interchangeable terms, by the way.
“Republicans are just as bad.”
-every blue pill beta on this board.
which is why it is not about substance of causes but strictly over ideology. If you are a left wing atheist God hating gun grabber, you can murder a preschool full of kindergartners or rape a church full of little boys or women… as long as you vote democrat !!
This stupid broad, maybe ;like to fellate the winkie of Willy ???
4636857165_56308309_xlarge
First, we should refer to this candidate as Mrs. Bill Clinton, or Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife, because that is all she is. Without Bill Clinton, this woman would have had absolutely no political career. She is the ultimate in feminist hypocrisy, in that she married her way to the top.
Second, the answer to the question in the title is simple, the leftist SJW movement needs political power in order to survive. Supporting someone like Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife is nothing more than a practical consideration.
Thirdly, anyone remember this? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-stands-by-her-defense-of-1975-rape-suspect/ Hillary Clinton (yes, she earned it this time) laughed at a 12 year old child rape victim and defended the attacker in court.
Hillary Hitlary Rotten Ham Benghazi Gate WHORE Clinton. Just mentioning her full title..
It’s ultimately about who a person is. Cosby is an old black guy with fame from his past acting and vocal political and social views that go against the larger agenda that SJWs serve. The Clinton’s politics serve that larger agenda so everything Bill Clinton may or may not have done, everything Hillary Clinton did to enable it, cover it up, whathaveyou means nothing because they advance the agenda.
Clinton got laid because he was powerful. If jones shot him down, that ain’t rape.
Hillary C. is not the nicest person around, to put it nicely. I wonder if the ones who plan to vote for her have any idea what they are getting themselves into.
========================
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is allegedly one of the most detested people under the protection of the Secret Service.
The First Family Detail, an explosive book by author Ron Kessler, reveals how both current and former agents strongly dislike being on Mrs Clinton’s detail, while also revealing how they felt about protecting Chelsea Clinton and Bill Clinton.
In the book, Kessler presented Chelsea as someone who not only respected and appreciated her agents, but also was a model protectee.
The former president is described as a difficult chief executive who is also easygoing in the book.
However, Hillary is exposed as being the complete opposite of her husband and daughter, and instead is reportedly very rude and acted nasty toward a number of agents.
‘Hillary was very rude to agents, and she didn’t appear to like law enforcement or the military,’ former Secret Service agent Lloyd Bulman recalled to Kessler.
‘She wouldn’t go over and meet military people or police officers, as most protectees do.
‘She was just really rude to almost everybody. She’d act like she didn’t want you around, like you were beneath her.’
On another occasion, a member of the uniformed Secret Service once cheerfully greeted Mrs Clinton by saying ‘Good morning, ma’am.’
‘F— off,’ is how she replied, according to Kessler’s book.
Kessler explained in the book that when Mrs Clinton is in public, she smiles and acts graciously.
‘As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident,’ he wrote.
‘Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi.’
…
While the former first lady was running for US Senate, Mrs Clinton stopped at an upstate New York 4-H Club, Kessler revealed in the best-selling book.
One Secret Service agents told him that Mrs Clinton saw cows and farmers and then erupted into anger.
‘She turned to a staffer and said, ‘What the f – – – did we come here for? There’s no money here.”
Furthermore, Kessler noted that Secret Service ‘agents consider being assigned to her detail a form of punishment.’
‘In fact, agents say being on Hillary Clinton’s detail is the worst duty assignment in the Secret Service,’ he concluded in the book.
source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3258858/Secret-Service-agents-view-Hillary-worst-duty-assignment-consider-assigned-form-punishment.html
========================
Former agent Jeff Crane says, “Hillary would cuss at Secret Service drivers for going over bumps.” Another former member of her detail recollects, “Hillary never talked to us . . . Most all members of first families would talk to us and smile. She never did that.”
“We spent years with her,” yet another Secret Service agent notes. “She never said thank you.”
Within the White House, Hillary had a “standing rule that no one spoke to her when she was going from one location to another,” says former FBI agent Coy Copeland. “In fact, anyone who would see her coming would just step into the first available office.”
One former Secret Service agent states, “If Hillary was walking down a hall, you were supposed to hide behind drapes used as partitions.”
Hillary one day ran into a White House electrician who was changing a light bulb in the upstairs family quarters. She screamed at him, because she had demanded that all repairs be performed while the Clintons were outside the Executive Mansion.
“She caught the guy on a ladder doing the light bulb,” says Franette McCulloch, who served at that time as assistant White House pastry chef. “He was a basket case.”
White House usher Christopher B. Emery unwisely called back Barbara Bush after she phoned him for computer troubleshooting. Emery helped the former first lady twice. Consequently, Kessler reports, Hillary sacked him. The father of four stayed jobless for a year.
source: http://nypost.com/2015/10/02/secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmare-to-work-with/
========================
Elitist bitch hormonally challenged and no doubt arrogant as fuck. Oh well, let them make that mistake.
I sincerely hope that SJWs feminazis get raped and severed badly. I Just can’t wait and would actually toast and celebrate whenever SJWs get murdered badly.
The Clinton’s are about to get schooled on the Internet. The hit on Bill Cosby is going to hurt the Clinton’s bad.
I wonder when females will file lawsuits against men for NOT responding to their advances….
It’ll happen and the courts will grovel to the females.