It Doesn’t Matter If Women Win Gold Medals At The Rio Olympics

The U.S. mainstream media is hailing the record number of female athletes which are heading to Rio de Janeiro for the Olympic Games, with a total of 292 out of the 555 American competitors being women. Because you know, gender gaps are worthy of congratulations and applause just as long as there are less men and more women stepping up to the plate.

In truth, this is actually a sad state of affairs. It means that the U.S. Olympic team will have less than a 50% chance of seeing a real champion, rather than a 2nd rate gold medalist from the weaker sex, achieving athletic glory on the world stage.

I’ve said it before in my previous article “Anything Women Can Do, Men Can Do Better,” and I’ll say it again in 2016. The best females can never outclass the best males in sport and athleticism.

Denial Is A River In Lefty Land

Feminists always love to espouse that women can be “just as good as any man” in sports, but this has always been a preposterous falsehood. The average women only has roughly 60% of the strength and muscle characteristics of a comparable man, and the greatest gender difference in upper body strength can probably be attributed to the fact that women tend to have a significantly lower proportion of their lean muscle tissue distributed in the upper body.

In other words, women will NEVER reach the stratospheric heights of the best male boxers, weightlifters, javelin throwers, hammer throwers, rowers, swimmers, pole vaulters, and a host of other Olympic events where upper body strength is pivotal to reaching the podium.

But what about feats of agility and stamina where upper body strength is not quite as vital? Such as Association Football (Soccer) and most running and jumping events at track and field? Well grab your adult coloring books and head to your “safe space” SJW’s, because the best male runners at the marathon (the biggest combo test of speed and stamina) are routinely faster than the best women.

“At every distance up to the marathon, the gap between men’s and women’s world record times is nine to 10 percent—and it’s a similar or even higher percentage among recreational runners.” – Runner’s World, April 2015 Edition

Get it? Due to irrefutable biological characteristics, women just don’t have the strength, speed, and physical fortitude to run faster or perform better at the same sport than the best men. Case in point, the Australian national women’s soccer team (which is participating at this Olympic games) was absolutely humiliated earlier this year by a 7 – 0 loss to the Australian national under FIFTEEN’s boys side (which is not participating).

Even in Olympic events which do not require overt displays of speed, stamina, or brute strength—such as gymnastics—denial dwelling SJWs and white knights may resort to saying that female gymnasts are more “graceful” and agile than their male counterparts.

Oh really? I beg to differ. Just watch British freerunner Will Sutton take a stroll around the Isle of Man, combining incredible acrobatics, athleticism, speed, stamina, and landing dangerous jumps that not a single woman has been able to emulate thus far.

(Note: Just watch between 1:30 and 3:15 if you are pressed for time. Any woman with half of this skill and daredevil would be showered with endless praises of “Goddess!” and “You’re such an inspiration!”)

Authoritative Quotes On Male And Female Physiology

‘Agility depends upon the ability to decelerate and accelerate fast, and men – because of their larger muscles – will always have an advantage,’ – Harry Brennan, Exercise Physiologist

‘There was a period in the Seventies when women equaled or broke more world records than men, but that was before the fall of the Berlin Wall.’  – Harry Brennan, Exercise Physiologist

(Translation: this was the era when Eastern Bloc coaches were feeding female athletes steroids like sweets. They were outright cheaters.)

‘The male skeleton is bigger and gives them an inherent advantage – larger bones are generally stronger,’ – Ignac Fogelman, Endocrinologist Professor

‘Faster men’s times for 100 to 800 meters are mostly due to men, on average, having greater muscle mass—and a larger portion of it is fast-twitch, which allows them to generate greater force, speed, and anaerobically produced energy’ – Chris Schwirian, Biological Sciences lecturer at Ohio University

World Athletic Records Men Vs. Women

100m Dash World Record

9.58 s – Usain Bolt (Men’s)

10.49 s – Florence Griffith Joyner (Women’s)

High Jump World Record

2.45 m – Javier Sotomayor (Men’s)

2.09 m – Stefka Kostadinova (Women’s)

Hammer Throw World Record

86.74 m – Yuriy Sedykh (Men’s)

79.58 m – Anita Wlodarczyk (Women’s)

PerformanceRatio_615

NO woman is better than the best man

We Thought Female Athletes Were Catching Up to Men, But They’re Not – Leftist News Outlet ‘The Atlantic

Conclusion

Whenever female athletes are awarded a “gold medal” at the Olympics, it should just be a giant knockoff of that cheap Hanukkah gelt (chocolate gold coins) that Jewish children get for the holiday season. After the brief surge of excitement that they have won “gold” (and attention whore themselves with it on Instagram), they can peel off the tin foil and feast on the chocolatey goodness inside until it’s all gone. “You go girl!” 😀

giphy

Yummy Cheap Chocolate Candy!! Omm Nom Nom Nom!!

After all, since women are ultimately just big children, they merely deserve to have big children’s candy. The REAL gold medals should be allocated to the real champions of a sporting discipline’s top tier, which will always be men.

Unfortunately, “equality” obsessed feminists and SJW’s will be absolutely thrilled when women take home gold medals at the Olympic games, even though their competitive talents and event completion times will be noticeably worse than many male athletes who will return home with nothing.

So best of luck to all the male athletes in the Games of the XXXI Olympiad! Go for gold! (And I do mean the real kind).

Read More: This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy

383 thoughts on “It Doesn’t Matter If Women Win Gold Medals At The Rio Olympics”

  1. The sandwich making world record is held by some woman from Poland. In 2013 she made 87 Reubens from scratch in an hour. In the men’s category the record is just 13.

    1. I honesty don’t know if it would be funnier if you made this up and included “87 Ruebens” or if it was real.
      Comment gold my friend

        1. I have a very tolerant attitude. Being a nihilist and an a if proclaimed in subjectivity in all matters, I usually will let most people’s opinions at worst annoy me. However, if you think I’m gonna sit here while you malign the finest sandwich known to man you have another thing coming bud.

        2. My name is C-squared and I approve this message….. mmmmkraut. I think ill have a Rueben or 2 today… or 87.

        3. Those Cuban sammiches are pretty stellar.. I’m from the south and we have “PoBoys” and they are fucking awesome…

        4. Both Cubans and poboys are great…oyster poboy on that soft white Bread with crystal hot sauce!

      1. <<e:u. ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::::!!bx891a:….,…

    2. Men even beat women in the kitchen. All the greatest chefs through history, from the middle ages to today, are men.

      1. I never beat my woman in the kitchen. That’s where she needs to be working.

      2. True and also not true. If you’re talking about just the profession, you’re absolutely right. Chefs work in hot fast paced environments. 12 hours in a steaming hot kitchen dashing around while chopping carrots or whatever else at a very fast pace. Difficult for women to compete with the pace.
        However if you’re talking about men beating women in the kitchen in general then absolutely incorrect. Women have a better sense of smell and taste, making them naturally suited to being better cooks.

        1. You’re mistaken. Women do not have a better sense of smell. They have a bigger propensity to take offense. Men can actually smell that the bag of pasta in the fridge is on the verge of going bad. Men just don’t care and know they won’t die. Women, on the other hand, would rather throw a fit and make you buy her some more pasta because money comes from MAGIC

        2. And that ‘superior’ sense of smell makes women the superior creatures that they are!

        3. If you say so….however, I disagree. The human race is superior because we’re made in God’s image.

        4. Do you really think that because women have a better sense of taste and smell they can cook better? How much time have you spent in the kitchen? How many world chef competitors have you been trained by?

        5. Yes, you were trying too hard….I chose to pretend you were being serious to nullify your poor attempt. Have a great day!!!

        6. If they were naturally better suited to being better cooks, then they would be better cooks, and there would be thousands of years of proof to that effect. Unfortunately for you, thousands of years of data shows that they are not even in the same league as their male counterparts, much less as good as, and no sane person would claim they are batter than male chefs. The quintessential chef has always and will always be male. That’s having nothing to do with running around in a hot kitchen (though of course men are better at that too) and everything to do with men’s superior sense of smell, understanding of chemistry, general creativity, etc., etc. …

        7. You are not relaying facts, you are relaying propaganda masquerading as science/facts. As a clinical psychologist trained in neuropsychology, I will say that none of the three links you gave contain any convincing evidence to support the claim. The idea that women have a better sense of smell/taste is put forward by feel-good “scientists.” SJSs (Social Justice Scientists), you might call them.

        8. You made the ridiculous claim to begin with, I simply stated the obvious in reply. How about you provide your proof for your wild claim that women are better cooks? Typical of leftists, make absurd claim and then pretend that the burden of proof rests on those who disagree with the stupidity you’ve put forward.

        9. That’s what I thought. No support for the wild claim is offered because there is no evidence to support it. Consequently, resort to grade school posturing.

        10. The article itself, in this junk science magazine, says that the data shows that “Funnily enough, girls generally prefer flavours which are not too strong. Boys, on the other hand, tend to like the more extreme flavours.” Which begs the question, do boys “need” more sourness and sweetness in order to recognize a taste, or do they simply prefer more sourness and more sweetness before they agree to assign a label? No way to tell for sure, since taste is very much influenced by subjective factors. The article reports on junk science and is similar to other articles Science Daily has considered to be worth publishing; like the articles they published that claim there exists a meaningful relationship between finger length and various patterns of thinking and behaviour. That’s about as scientific as phrenology. Social Justice Scientists hard at work.

      3. Most cooking schools didn’t even accept women applicants in that time period, genius. That’s like saying that all white people are superior businessmen because all the business tycoons in the pre-emancipation US were white.

        1. I hate to break this to you, but, uh, white people are statistically superior business people, except possibly compared to Jews and Eastern Asians.

    3. LOL….fucking Reubens are tough sandwhich to make with the special sauce and all….

    4. You don’t want to strike out with this Korean babe so make sure you shower and use cologne so you don’t discourage her with your foul balls! Har! Har! Har!

      1. she tips her pitches. slow delivery to the mound means she would be bad at holding runners on. WND (would not draft)

      2. those korean girls will give you yellow fever whether you like Asians or not. They’re thorough breds over there compared to the mutt Asians here.

        1. And if you want to start a fight in either Japan or Korea just state that fact. They hate each other with a white hot passion.

      1. I agree that women are generally weaker than men, there is absolutely no denying that – but this performance was actually quite impressing.

      2. That’s not even a real sport. She’s be a good orgy girl at the olympic village.

      3. You missed the point, it’s not that women are terrible, it’s that men are better.

        For example this guy did the same course, and didn’t fail.

  2. Perhaps the only two sports where women MIGHT beat men is indoor volleyball and gymnastics.

    1. A woman will never beat a man at indoor volleyball. I don’t know how points work in gymnastics. If they are based on skill and strength women can’t win. If they are based on giving me boners and getting fingered by really creepy Eastern European pedophiles then the women will take it

      1. Creepy Eastern European pedophiles. That’s gold
        #BelaKarolyrubbinghishandslikeBirdman

        1. But seriously, every time I see a male gymnastics coach carrying or slapping the ass of one of his gymnasts I don’t know if to feel disturbed or aroused. Emotional roller coaster indeed.

        2. Might be a bit of both. It is a very real thing that in gyms, typically personal male trainers get to bed their female clients. At a disproportionately high ratio.

  3. Say what you want. Women’s Gymnastics is legit. However, since I stopped being a teenager I’ve notices all the wobbles and erratic movements in the female gymnasts whereas the male gymnasts display pure power and control.

    1. One of the latest contestants has a flip named after her. Sounds like an Olympic level feat in my book. She may also have the World Record for the most consecutive flips in a row. Many females are really stoked about Simone Biles but she appears to be the real deal in terms of athleticism.

    2. Yeah. I will give props to elite level women’s gymnastics. They do rightfully dominate in aspects I will never fathom. Doing that balancing stuff on a skinny long beam. Beyond what I can physically accomplish.

      1. Yep the Balance Beam is unbelievable… Those chicks do a flip and land on that thing. Men could never do that event for obvious reasons i.e. their scrotum..

        1. I’m no judge and I’ve had a few drinks but that routine was almost flawless. so much power and control, no wobbles or arm movements to cover up mistakes, it was almost machine like, and had traits of male strength and control.

        2. In this case, you have to understand the relatively high testosterone levels that black women possess. Would put some white men to shame. Sometimes its evident in the physique (like this gymnast, Michelle Obama, the Williams sisters in tennis, etc.). But in general, in society, it is quite evident in their behavior.

        3. The balance beam favours the female body type due to their smaller feet, lower center of gravity and lesser height. It has little to do with genitals. However the most daring balance acts (like walking over a canyon on a rope) have been performed by men and some men who have dabbled in the beam have done fairly well. I have no doubt that men could compete on a level with women there as well but for historical reasons women’s and men’s events are different and there’s no sign of it changing anytime soon.

        4. Re: genitals and the balance beam if a man fell and straddled the beam it could be devastating to the testicles….Sure we could do it but again the testicles…

        1. Jeez Tom. So Death used it’s knowledge of poor OSHA practices in that gym & Heinrich’s Domino Theory of accidents to get the job done?

        2. LMFAOOOO!!!! I’ve never commented on this site till now,
          long time lurker…This comment is gold Frank lol.

    3. Im all for women being flexible. Gymnastics has a practical application and I approve.

        1. Kudos to you, good sir-the legs and asses over there are probably the most beautiful in existence.
          Though I wonder, why are the ordinary volleyball players hotter than the butch-looking sand-volleyball players, although they play the same sport?

    4. Agreed. that American girl who was already injured who still completed her last event, with her Romanian coach picking her up and carrying her to the sideline is an iconic moment, right up there with the US hockey team beating the rooskies in 1980

      1. are you referring to Keri Strug in 96? what made that a great moment in sport was that they just needed to do ok on the vault and the entire team had a meltdown. Dawes, Mocianeau, Miller either fell in their ass or overran the landing, then Strug fell on her ass too and sprained her ankle, she cowboyed the fuck up and landed it to win the gold. The only thing detracting from that was that it was on home territory in Atlanta.

    5. Female gymnasts train too hard at too young an age and it messes with their development. It disrupts puberty or something. I can’t help but think about that while watching women’s gymnastics.

  4. This is total bullshit! Caitlyn Jenner won he decathlon!
    Srsly tho: great article

    1. Pole smoking too. Though looking at how faggy the men are at the Olympics and how butch the girls are, men would win this too.
      I really can’t understand how, in this day and age, there is still an Olympics. Who is watching this nonsense?

    2. I saw this amazing pole dancer in Montreal- the pole had to be 20 feet high, maybe more. That strip club was the scariest, rowdiest strip club Ive ever been in.

    1. Lol the greatest snioers are in the miliyary thats what counts. Deadly men who kill half a dozen enemy soldiers and come back alive. I dont see much females sniper soldiers. U can keep ur painball gun ill stick with my m16 whooaa

    2. Shooting a gun at a piece of paper is an Olympic sport but wrestling and baseball are not. Kudos for her, she has good video game reflexes, but she’s not an athlete.

      1. come on baseball shouldn’t be anywhere near the olympics its not even remotely global. It’s pretty ridiculous.
        Almost as ridiculous as taking out wrestling !!! surely one of the ancient and original sports of the Olympics. Do you know why they did ???

      2. Agreed. Likewise, I could not understand why the poker tournament was on ESPN. How could they even call that a sport?

        1. Pawn stores on the History channel. Granted I suppose you can find some old stuff there occasionally but.. wow.

        2. On Pawn Stars, they selectively pick items that has some historical relevance and elaborate on it. I find that interesting about the show.

        3. Ah.. I’ve never watched it. I just dislike the whole theme of “Ice Road Truckers” belonging on a channel that should be teaching history. No offense to truck drivers but they’re not very historical to me. I’d prefer real history lessons, or at the very least just re-running the same Nazi stuff endlessly.

  5. Im having trouble understanding the article’s point. Women are weaker than men. So? We didnt know this? No one knew this? Their gold medals and thousands of hours of work are worth nothing?
    Its like telling a youth sports team that their championship doesnt mean shit because they cant beat an older team or fully grown men. Or that light or middle weight fighter’s titles don’t mean anything because they didn’t fight someone heavier. These people put in hundreds or thousands of hours of work and are the best in their class. Most of these olympic women could probably crush you in their sport today (granted they’ve been training, you havent).
    Im not defending women or female athletes. Im defending people who trained for something, stuck with it and became the best in their class. What is there not to commend about that? Whether or not that raises or lowers their SMV is another story and depends on the sport.

    1. Think of it this way. When women cheat they take male hormones, not female hormones. Basically that means women are trying to imitate men in sports and doing an inferior job of it.
      Or think of it this way. Does anybody really care if the US women win gold medal in basketball, if they can be defeated by boys high school basketball team?

    2. I agree 100%. I would actually defend them here. First things first I get the validity of this and think its useful and will quote directly to destroy feminists when they start their nonsense that we are the exact same and they can do anything we can. But it certainly doesnt belittle their achievement its great for them ONCE taken in context.
      Don’t see the need to knock them in general for participating and being happy t0 be the best in the world of women. It’s when they start saying they are equal too and better than men that i take umbrage.
      Too many fucking idiots on here hate women. Feminists I despise women I love and see as essential for life.Just not your average modern western woman.

      1. U are right, everytime i say sonething abiut how men are always better women say oh u must hate wimen why dont u turn gay lol. I only hate the pompous bitches who think they can beat a male boxer or can create scientific achievements like men do. In the end i just hate feminist and manginas. Women on the other hand i love em, until they bring out the feminist bitch inside them then i hate them.

        1. Yeah im the same. My last few girlfriends have been foreign and from traditional cultures so they appreciate a man’s man who takes charge and makes decisions (not that they always thank you at the time) and they like traditional gender roles. It just helped me realize good women are there and are enjoyable you just have to look hard for them !!!!

      2. You are 100% right. There is no way the top female athletes could ever beat the top male athletes. But that doesn’t actually diminish the top women’s achievements. Not to mention the fact that I suspect half of the readership on this site probably couldn’t run to the end of their driveways without risking a heart attack, let alone beat some of these women’s records. Just because the top woman can never best the top man in a particular sport doesn’t mean she can’t beat a lot of men in said sport. I’m a female (amateur) runner. My Boston times are handicapped for both my age and gender. So yes, I have a lower threshold to meet when qualifying, based on the fact that I belong to the physically weaker sex. But that doesn’t take away from the fact that I can beat some men, and some women, even those younger than me. In any event, the sheer discipline required to reach Olympic levels should be admired.

        1. Yeah we are in agreement. I try to have a rational view on these things. Too many losers on here with an issue with women.
          My issue is with modern feminism and liberal culture.
          Out of interest as a woman what brings you to this site ???

        2. Mostly an absolute hatred of current feminism and lefty culture. For the most part I love men (especially my super duper awesome husband but also men in general). Some of you are real a-holes— so are some of us. We females aren’t all jerks though. I don’t agree with a lot of what’s said on this site, but I do agree with some of it. In any event I think today’s culture is just so antagonistic towards men….so weird. I’m not some traditional female either. My hubby and I are kid free dinks and I’m very career oriented. Which doesn’t mean I would ever put down a woman who wanted to put her family first. No way! She’s a better person than I in a lot of respects. That’s selfless man, sacrifices I wasn’t willing to make. As a career woman though, I have nothing but respect for men, many of whom have proved to be amazing mentors. This site needs to stop completely trashing women, namely because you have fans where you wouldn’t expect. This current wave of feminism is insulting to women like me. Men (in my experience anyways) will treat you with the same respect they treat each other: as long as you earn it. I don’t need special favors, I’m intelligent and reasonably competent, and men treat me accordingly. Yeah sure, I can’t jog at night with my iPod on. So what? I also thoroughly bitched out a construction worker recently (who was in the wrong) and didn’t get my teeth knocked out. #femalepriviledge. There’s advantages and disadvantages to both sexes: it’s high time we acknowledge and respect those differences. Thanks for letting me rant!

        3. did you just refer to yourself as a “kid-free dink”? Thats hilarious, good luck to you and your man, if you plan to have kids, I bet you’ll keep them active and healthy

        4. No we are in total agreement. It’s actually refreshing and reassuring to hear a female or male get the balance correct.
          Lot of men on here just hate women because they can’t get any.I strongly believe in traditional gender roles but its a guideline and a majority not some steadfast rule. You aren’t motherly or nurturing fine,be a career women !! It takes all types and always has. I’ve always said that,not everyone woman is going to pop out ten children and love it.
          It’s the promoting and prompting of women to go against their nature and sacrifice motherhood for the rat race that i have a problem with. And career women taking a pop at mothers and saying they are being dominated by men and need to be more feminist and modern. Thats where I have an issue.
          I love that you can appreciate both the disadvantages and advantages of your gender. Really nice to talk to you and it’s good to meet people and a woman in particular (no offence) that can be this rational and logical on the subject. Your husband is a lucky man.

        5. Thanks! My husband is a truly wonderful human being, so actually I’m the lucky one. I don’t necessarily think one has to subscribe to traditional gender roles, but as a woman born at the very tail end of Gen X, I am in agreement with you that my generation was sold a big fat lie. It worked out well for me, since I doubt I would have been anymore nurturing had I been born in an earlier generation. There have always been women like me, and I was the first generation given real choice on the matter. BUT, we were the first generation to have this career first mentality shoved down our throats… and it’s ended in a lot of heartbreak for many of us. Mother Nature didn’t get the memo with regards to our new plans. Many of us left it too late and are now very well paid, sad people. I consistently tell the young women who work for me:”if you don’t want kids, that’s fine, but if you do—your job can wait—your ovaries can’t. And if you do want kids–stop messing around with guys who aren’t serious. In my experience men are actually quite decisive when they want to marry. If he’s not making real inroads in that direction within a couple years—drop him. He doesn’t consider you marriage material and you are wasting your best family years on some schlep who will fuck around til he’s forty and then go find a suitably fertile woman to settle down. He has that luxury—you don’t. It’s not fair, but lots of things in life aren’t fair.”I guess I can be objective about this because I got what I wanted, but I think us X ladies are doing the younger generation a real disservice not warning them what could lie ahead.

        6. DINK: double income- no kids. We won’t be breeding but for a kid free couple our weekends are eaten up between, soccer coaching, swim lessons etc… for our nieces/nephews/friend’s kids. People shouldn’t knock non-breeders: we have the time and money to invest in other people’s kids. Gives the parents a break and it’s fun and we get to give them back after and go hit patio lol! My 3 year old nephew will run his first 500 meter run with me this fall. It’s a kiddie run and I suspect hilarity will ensue, but it’s never too early to get them started. There are 2 kinds of people in this world: the fast, and the hungry. Make sure you raise the former;) Best.

        7. That’s very true, and a very serious problem. But to be fair, men kill each other violently. Don’t get me wrong, I’m grateful to live in a very safe society and I don’t walk through my life suspecting every man is a potential serial rapist/ killer. The risk is actually extremely low, but I still don’t think it’s comparable to male on male violence. I’m actually quite disappointed with the dismally low numbers of female serial killers. I think I’m going to lobby for more affirmative action in that area. We ladies need to be given the same opportunities to stuff people in our walls as you 😀

        8. We live in a culture which doesnt honour its men, ie as in china & japan.
          While women are pedestalised to fuck.
          This is why men are killed more then women.
          You kill what you dont value, you destroy what you dont honour or respect.
          It has nothing to do with men being more violent.
          Look at the stats, women kill far more people then men. Except women are despicable & cowards, women kill the weak & helpless.
          Women kill & sexually abuse more infants & children then all the murders of men put together every year. Fact.
          The difference is, men dont try & legalise the murder of the victims they target. Proving just how dangerous & sociopathic women really are.

    3. I think the subtext is that title IX needs to go away and we need to stop wasting university money on female “athletes” as well as a further subtext that all women’s sports including tennis and basketball and soccer and whatever else, need to stop having professional status and should stop being funded. It is a waste of money and teaching a bad lesson

      1. We need to stop wasting university money on ALL athletics, but yeah, women would be a good start.
        If a sport at that level isn’t self funding, then it is either paid for by the participants (IE, like a traveling team in high school) or it goes away. College should be about learning, not the fucking minor leagues for football and basketball. That tuition dollars go to this shit is just beyond comprehension.

        1. Not true. A lot of colleges make more money on real athletics than they spend by a long shot. Also, it gives talented kids with little hope otherwise a chance to get to a university. An athletic education has always been a part of the university and rightly so. But letting girls prance about and pretend they are athletes is counter productive.
          That said, yes, college athletics ought to be something better than just minor leauge sports. It ought to be about students learning to be rounded people, scholars, gentlemen and, yes, athletes and not about some illiterate jig who happens to be 7 feet tall getting A’s in his communications class.
          It is problematic and poorly done today , but college sports are just as important as the academics. The Ivy leauge is an athletic competition, not an academic one. That is a telling thing.

        2. That’s true, but just because a university can sell tickets to something doesn’t mean they should go into business doing it. I mean there’s the argument that kids should be physically fit, but how much does a football team actually encourage physical fitness, outside the team roster?
          Schools could also make tons of money selling swimsuit calendars of freshman girls, or doing camgirl sites, or baking cakes and selling them to the public, but that doesn’t mean they should. If people have a demand for sports, there are plenty of sports they can pay to attend, schools notwithstanding.

    4. Thank you! I am a woman, a small woman at that, and thus significantly weaker/slower than almost all men. I’m also in very good shape which means I am significantly faster (though not stronger) than a lot of out of shape men. If those men I refer to trained, they would surely kick my ass. But they don’t, and I do, and while it certainly doesn’t make me an Olympian, I do the best I can with what I was dealt. Really, in all levels of sport this is what we should be aiming for. Best in class, and failing that, personal best. Is the author going to criticize an octogenarian marathon runner because he/she can’t beat an 18 year old?!
      With the obesity epidemic looming large we should be encouraging both girls and boys to engage in sports.

  6. Makes me think of a great scene from the old movie “The Great Race”. There’s a scene between Natalie Wood and Tony Curtis
    Natalie Wood: Equality, real equality
    of the sexes bothers you, doesn’t it.
    I can speak, read and write Russian,
    French and Arabic.
    Tony Curtis: Yes, so can I. Plus five other languages.
    Natalie Wood: I can drive any car there is.
    Tony Curtis: So can Hezekiah.
    Natalie Wood: I won the
    Woman’s International Competition.
    (she picks up a foil) En garde.
    Tony Curtis: Very well.
    (he picks up a foil and easily wins) Now if you’d won the
    Men’s International Fencing Competition…

  7. Can someone photoshop that first pic with the girls biting their gold metals so it looks like they are putting dicks in their mouths?

      1. She is one fine POA I’ll give her that. She also has a 1000 cock stare.
        I will tell you this, being at the Olympic village must be one huge fucking orgy.

        1. Sigh, youre right- it is an orgy. I read an article on how many comdoms are used by the athletes at the games, Im amazed they have the energy to compete

        2. Are you kidding? These are kids. At 22 I could fuck all day and then go home and JO after and I wasn’t half the physical specimen of these kids. I can only imagine how much fucking poon Michael Phelps had. I assume he just laid nekkid in the middle of the street while the Olympic parade walked by and fucked him

        3. I would expect them to do so. And one must suppose that alcohol also flows in that village like raw sewage to Copacabana beach.

        4. You just know that some of these women are looking at the event as a chance to cash in on their current SMV, hoping for a shag with a high profile athlete.
          Deep down, they know that nobody gives a shit about female handball.

      2. Makes you wonder. I’ve heard stories about how the parents of these girls do anything from mortgaging their home, to living out of their car, to working multiple jobs, just so their girls can focus on gymnastics. When that well runs dry and they have to look for sponsorship somewhere else, I wonder how many Wall Street tycoons line up to “lend a hand.”

        1. Thats insane, its not like there’s a professional gymnast league awaiting them. “I worked 16 jobs and took out a second mortgage because I want my son to be the best shot-puter in the world.”

        2. I guess gymnastics, unlike other sports, revolves around the Olympics too much. If you make it and win, you might be set for life, if not, you will crap out big time. No wonder these kids turn into messed up adults. While there might not be a league per se, I know there are professional competitions. But here’s the thing. Not that many people outside of fans care about them since it’s not the Olympics. That’s unlike, say, soccer, where after the World Cup ends, there’s professional leagues that have large followings.

      3. After she uses the olympics to attention whore to increase her SMV, she will be positioned to max out her earning potential as dubai porta potty.

      1. It’s possible. Those girls look like a lot of what they put in their mouths has a second comming

        1. Reminds me of that one Faith+1 song from South Park….
          “I want to get down on my knees and start pleasing Jesus. I wanna feel his salvation all over my face.”

        2. nude gymnastics. I think that would get the highest rating in tv history.

        3. And, no one has to pretend that they’re weren’t turned on and feel like dirty pedos anymore. Because, let’s face it, as amazing as their athletic abilities are, we all know why these girls are put in teeny tiny leotards. So that men can drool over them and do that women can admire and envy them.

        4. “I want to get down on my knees and start pleasing Jesus. I wanna feel his salvation all over my face.”

        5. So after the millennial generation are we just going to call them generation attention whore?

        6. How would you figure that looks like man-ass? You hiding some sexual frustration brah?

        7. If you are going to call out a woman for having a nice ass, at least show us a woman with a nice ass!

        8. You mean, something that looks fake, like what you just posted? To each his own, I suppose.

        9. Yep, to each his own. Me; curvy sexpots no one has to question. You; narrow hipped, hard edged high-T, mini She-HulKS that make you inspect the neck on the sly.
          Hey, suspiciously masculine chics need love too.

        10. You’re the only one questioning her gender. To me she looks like a woman alright. Or maybe you’re compensating for some weird sexual taste you have. Plus your woman has a face I wouldn’t exactly call feminine.

  8. On the other hand, these women get off their asses and exert enough self-discipline not to turn into all the fat chicks we see these days.

  9. Whenever I hear about women competing in anything, I can’t help but remember what people said about Bruce Jenner: “It just proves men are better at everything, including being a woman.”

    1. The worst for me are the dad’s of daughters and no sons. They want so dearly want their daughters to be boys and refuse to acknowledge that boys and girls are different.
      They bring their girls to the gym and enroll them in classes with boys that the girls have no right to be in. Even though, I know this is a mistake, I legally and financially (always let a fool part with his cash) can’t say no. Thus, I watch as the girls go through heartache and humiliation just so dad and mom can feel better about themselves.

      1. I don’t know what you’re talking about. Girls love their sports. Athletes who don’t love their sport quit. They’re not being humiliated… unless you’re a homosexual who can’t stop thinking about men and thus constantly compares the girls to the men.

  10. I could not give less of a shit about the Olympics, regardless of sex. Even before I unplugged from Marxist sports media, I could not give less of a shit about the Olympics.

  11. I remember when I was a kid it was common sense that the best men are physically superior to the best women in terms of strength, agility, endurance, etc. Oh yeah and in terms of intelligence as well.

  12. Are men better at air rifle shooting? wait wait wait… why is this in the Olympics?! Lacrosse isn’t even in the Olympics.. The Olympics are stupid. Globalist propaganda machine.

      1. Sucks they took out gladiator sports back who knows when. LOL!
        That is real Olympic competition. Your life depends on you winning.

      2. Wrestling is still there. It was cut for 2020 then reinstated about 6 months later after a campaign.

        1. I was sickened when I saw they cut it-a sport dating back to the dawn of humanity which is as pure as can be in terms the definition of competition and they did this-fuck those assholes.

      3. No doubt – wrestling IS The Olympics, since its nascent era!
        Plus, they took away something that takes minutes to finish versus something that takes HOURS and is about as exciting to watch as paint dry? Good job, IOC!

    1. There are loads of sports that shouldn’t be there: football, tennis, golf, bmx, road cycling, basketball, rugby. It is all about the money nowadays, there is even talk of getting rollerblading, climbing and surfing.

  13. Eff the olympics. all these kids are staying in shitholes, and the nba players are chilling on the Love Boat out in the harbor, Isaac servin them up drinks

  14. There was a Guatemalan chap who won his country’s first ever medal in 2012, a silver in speed walking. Now I mentioned this because, for one, as goofy as it looks, speed walking looks tough as hell. Plus, we can correctly assume Guatemala’s sports budget overall must be way smaller than that of the American women’s sports. And yet, this guy soldiered on, never complaining, and using whatever scant resources he had at its fullest.

  15. If you look at some species of mantises, the female will sometimes eat the head of the male during mating. Nobody complains about it being sexist against the males of that species, that’s just what’s natural for them.
    In humans, it’s the males who are dominant. Women are naturally inferior to men. Men have more lean body mass and less fat. Men are taller, stronger, and have larger brains.Natural selection has favored one sex to be the dominant one. That’s just nature and biology

  16. Usually I agree with you Roosh but not on this article I must say. The olympics for me is about finding out who is the best from each country and each gender. While women cannot in general perform to the standard of men in sport, it is nonetheless cool to watch the people who are able to push their body to its furthest limits compete for gold.
    Don’t get me wrong, I prefer watching the men’s events, but I don’t mind watching female Olympic events at all. As far as gender equality on teams goes. I’d be happy with 50/50 as I believe there are pretty much the same amount of medals on offer for each gender. A gold medal is a gold medal at the end of the day. Just my two cents.

    1. It is natural for men to excel in athleticism. Not so for women. Being physically buffed like a man for women is quite unnatural, quite honestly, a turn off.

      1. I get that man. But honestly I’d say more female athletes are in great shape than the ones that are unnaturally buff. Honestly I think anything that encourages women to get fit is a good thing with the amount of fatties in the western world.

    2. “it is nonetheless cool to watch the people who are able to push their body to its furthest limits”
      You’d be better of watching gonzo porn

      1. Maybe that’s the next Olympic sport. I dunno, the 400 meter cock relay, or the Mandingo pole vault, or the 100 yard doggy paddle.

        1. ha women will be lining up to participate in the Mandingo pole vault, but not as competitors

      2. Hahaha. Look honestly mate anything that encourages women to stay in good shape I’m in support of.

      1. No need to be condescending. I’m the first one to pipe up at politically correct bullshit but I see no problem in having a 50/50 split of female/male athletes.

      1. I’m talking about being aimed at females, from 10 through Hillary (no shred of femininity left). Lets be honest, a girl is a girl no matter what stage of life she’s at. Guys already know this to be a fact. Society indoctrinates the weaker sex to the contrary. Poor bastards. But I suppose a coloring book of the same name could be made for younger girls. Just be filled of pictures of boys doing things better than them, and a girl taking a dodgeball to the face on the cover.

  17. The mens decathlon used to be a HUGE deal. Now, it barely gets mentioned, it seems. Not sure why this is.

      1. Olympic trans-gendering? Could Bruce beat his record of transitioning into a woman in under 9.97 seconds?

        1. how about transcontinental transgendering? You start in NYC as a man, and by the time you get to LA, you must be a woman

        2. He could, but as we saw in Alaska, a transgender man beating women would piss feminists off pretty good. Not that I wouldn’t get a good chuckle out of it.

        3. They’ll have to add 2 new categories for a total of 4. You have the usual Men’s and Women’s. Then they”ll add Man to Woman Trans and Woman to Man Trans. The last 2 can’t be equal biologically, of course. How would they control doping? Hormone injections are not allowed.

        4. They’ll short circuit like Hillary. The logic will not compute, so then they resort to name calling like “You’re an A-hole!” or something of that nature.

        5. How would they control for doping. I think in the transitioning categories it would be mandatory
          Having said that a good deal of women’s sport is pretty much female to male transitioning – insofar as testosterone is a factor

        6. Screw that. I’m actually going to campaign for trannies to be accepted EVERYWHERE, just to piss the smug out of feminist faces.

        7. You will get lots of ‘progressive’ brownie points for that. You will be an LGBTQ hero and fifth columnist

        8. Brownie points? Ah, I thought you were throwing some weird scat porn analogy! But yes, let’s build a tranny army, so that we destroy Title IX from within!

  18. The hell with these gay games anyway. They originated in Nazi Germany and are nothing but another tool of the globalist propaganda. Let them turn them 100% female plus the homos and the trannies for a complete set of the weidos games!
    Will Sutton video though are amazing to watch

    1. Agree. Who cares about some people doing exercises. If they do it for fun and for themselves, cool. Making a standardized competition out of it is silly.

    2. So Zee Evil Germans started the Olympics? Someone forgot to tell this to the Ancient Greeks.

      1. Guilty as charged right here-but we didn’t make it into the joke it has become at least. It was the Frog bastards anyway not them stinking Krauts 🙂

        1. Do you mean the structure and pomp of it? And if so, one more thing the Nazi’s were ahead of the curve on.

  19. This article is outdated. The UK team has two genetically male athletes competing as females. All you need is a low T count for a year and a new wardrobe.
    This year has a Diversity Macht Frei theme with the Refugee mugrat team, but throws in a little gender bending.

      1. It’s just a convenient abbreviation for muslim immigrant. (I didn’t coin it.)
        Refugee and rapefugee are often inaccurate. I think gimmegrant is still quite descriptive.

    1. In this lifetime we will live to see female olympic records dominated by the bruce-trans-jenner types.This shit show is just beginning.

      1. There’s a swimmer G Ryan who ‘identifies as genderqueer’ who competed in the women’s swimming Olympic trials. G ‘doesn’t identify as male or female’, ‘prefers they/them/theirs’, yet chose to compete with women (or likes the shower scenery better).
        This is newsworthy because I’m pretty sure it’s a guy. G says “I’m under the trans umbrella”. Why not have men/women/trans categories? I’m sure early entrants would win by default. (I can’t imagine there was too much competition to get into the Refugee team.)

        1. Disagree. You know they got some good pole vaulters and decathletes in the Refugee team, what with jumping fences and such.

        2. The Soros organization selected the best of the best for the Refugee team. Gold medals forthcoming.

      2. Honestly, I think non-Western nations will complain and put a stop to transsexual Olympians if they start robbing medals from them.

  20. There are exceptions to every rule. That said, on average, after 22 years in the United States Army, in hard billets and easy ones, men are superior mentally, emotionally, and physically. Not “different”, superior. Anecdotal, but once in a pouring down rainstorm out in the field, I walked by four female “Soldiers” who were attempting to load a GP Large into a 5 ton. I was laughing my ass off watching these four slip and slide in the mud struggling. I said to one of my squad leaders, “Watch this”. I walked over, readjusted some straps, grabbed the thing and heaved it up into the back of the truck.
    I have worked in all male units, and in mixed units. All male were relatively easy to be in once the natural pecking order was figured out. Mixed units are a nightmare. Women had more injuries, more sick time, more visits to the shrink by far, and caused way more drama than men. P.T. with the female “Soldiers” was a joke. I had to actually schedule different runs because wanting to push the men in my Platoon to their best was impossible with the girls along for the four to eight mile run.
    As obvious as it is to everyone involved, the Army still shoved the “equality” meme down our throats. Glad it was time for me to retire.

    1. the military is so fucked now that it is coed. How did you make it that long..Must been awful seeing the military go down the shitter with all the gal troops. Should be segregated basic training also…

      1. I was a Drill sergeant at Ft. Knox for two years. It was all male basic. Both summers we had one four week coed ROTC basic camp. It was chaos. Half the female soldiers were trying to screw the Drill Sergeants. Quite a few succeed.
        One of the ways I made it was to leave the conventional Army and get into a unit that was more specialized. There were a few women around, but everyone understood that they were a potential source of trouble. Tolerated, but rarely taken seriously.

        1. My last unit, an armored cav squadron (essentially a battalion), had exactly one woman in it. Ugly as a mud fence.
          But surprise, surprise… she got impregnated by one chump who I though had his shit together. Guess not.
          He had left West Point after one year and was obligated to come onto active duty as an E3 or E4… can’t remember.

    2. My uncle was in Army guard.. An O-6 and he told similar stories… Gal soldiers getting pregnant on purpose to avoid active duty or being sent overseas was scandalous….

      1. I have two sons, both of whom are athletic and intelligent. Already proficient with firearms, etc. Neither will be joining any branch of the military. I have told my daughters I will disown them if they ever do.
        The purpose of an army is to meet with, engage, and destroy the enemy. Period. Western civilization allows this at its own peril.

        1. Our eldest son withdrew from consideration at West Point during his junior year in High School, after having the Congressional nomination(s) in hand and all his other ducks in a row.
          We found out the Point’s Chain of Command expelled a cadet who was mugged by 3 blacks at the behest of a black Diva. The poor kid was on his way home, and just like that he was bleeding and unconscious on the airport’s CCTV with a blatant blind-side racial attack.
          The Academy and the administration tried to strong arm the airport to keep the video under wraps using Federal pressure, but it still got out. Even then, they still tried to ramrod their own cadet.
          Needless to say, when we received the official letter of assurance (acceptance), our entire family thought better of it.

        2. The Military has become a place for social norming and social experimentation. Instead of allowing the military to reflect the society at large, and the inherent values of its members, it has become a place to introduce and force values at odds with those of Western Civilization.
          It was the openly gay thing that did it for me. I was done. I still work as a contractor in a specialized field, but I am saving my dimes and planning an escape from even that. All because of the P.C. infiltration.

    3. Your experience mirrors mine, and I was in for quite a few years myself. To say that women didn’t carry their weight would be an understatement… no matter what the feminists, who have never served, might claim.

  21. This olympics has had one of the lowest attendance rates in recent history.

  22. at least, these women do sports and are good. To me, Most of them are better/prettier than the average female (understand : sjws, leftists, feminists, all woman with fat asses who never do sports).. they have even more value than some males (understand : fat omega/beta who don’t do self improvement, feminists males etc.)
    I won’t criticize any female athlete… until they begin bragging/posing nude on stupid social media.

  23. Oh, come on. Don’t be like this. We must encourage sport to make them lose weight and bet hot and tight.

  24. Yeah, you know women can do anything men can do, in high heels and backwards.

  25. Many liken it to a high school cafeteria, “except everyone’s beautiful,”
    That has to be the best line in that whole article.
    Edit: Also “Even if their face is a 7, their body is a 20.”

        1. I’m not into such practices myself, but you my lad, live entirely in your head ,which is often fantastic and brilliant in its thoughts, however you’re a strange kind of innocent when it comes to more visceral and sensuous concerns. You’d find the whole thing disgusting and repellent and you’d be scared shitless of having all those sweaty and heaving bodies around you. Just as I would be too.

        2. Every female athlete you see on tv is getting pumped daily by alpha cock. This is the true nature of female behavior when all societal restrictions are removed.

        3. But all societal restrictions AREN’T removed. Olympic chicks go to the games with their friends, family, and coaches.

        4. You’ve that kind of peculiar late 19th century bourgeois German mentality, like the young Mann or Hesse, who put spirituality before sexuality when in their 20s. I admire this, but, as they matured they began to view this dichotomy between body and spirit in a less absolutist manner.
          Geist in German means a state of spiritual “enactment” that’s difficult to understand in other languages. It’s more akin to a set of ways, some quite abstract, others more posited in ways that relate to the communal and natural worlds.
          With you, I’m not sure about your fate? You seem to live at times in an imagined or possible world that has potential in your mind but only as an idea, rather than a tangible reality which you’re willing to grasp?

        5. Whaaat? I reject any form of dichotomy between spirituality and the flesh. Where from do ypu get these assumptions about me? I once even wrote an article suggesting the body IS the soul.
          Spirituality is not just sunshine and weightless Geist. It is also the agonizing wheels of sex that crush the soul of those who oppose them, and death, and existential angst, and crude brutality.
          In fact, spirituality is precisely the meditation on those dark unforgiving forces of nature.
          If I have problems with my sexuality, its because of my trauma, less due to ideology.

        6. “In fact, spirituality is precisely the meditation on those dark unforgiving forces of nature” Nicely stated, but are these forces always necessarily dark? They seem indifferent to the fate of the individual alright , but, they’re power is only partial. I believe you become master of your destiny the more you use, transmute and incorporate these forces into one’s spirit. Ride the dragon, be the fire tamer and slayer in one breath. This is the basis of all magic and power over the wildness within and without.
          “Jesus said, “Blessed is the lion that the human being will devour so that the lion becomes human. And cursed is the human being that the lion devours; and the lion will become human.”

        7. Heh. They are not dark per se, of course. But they appear dark. And to go down into that darkness, to discover that it is not truly dark, that is what I would call spirituality. I think we are pretty much on the same page here.

        1. I might as well say AMLYSC = All Men Like You Suck Cock. It’s equally as factual. LOL
          Well, I’m considering starting my daughters on long distance running with a 2024 Olympic dream. I can tell you – as I’m sure many fathers can – that my daughters won’t be like that because I raise them with standards.
          You really seem to be suffering from some delusional fantasy probably caused by chronic stupidity.

        2. So you’re not making a serious argument, just trolling?
          My conservative-raised daughters who will be chaperoned at all times to ensure modest behaviour (and, frankly, to prevent them from being raped) will be perfectly safe in the Olympic Village.
          I’m getting a bit ahead of myself, though. My eldest is only 7. I just dislike the assumptions you make. I know they’re false.
          There’s a lot of honest girls and women in the Olympics… there’s some proper sluts too – I don’t doubt it – but not all chicks are slobs, man.

        3. How so? I’m failed because I raise my daughters conservatively and care for their safety, or because I encourage them to be athletic (which equals sexy)???

        4. I could troll better than that with my cock shoved up my own ass.
          Put a little more effort into it, man. You’re a fucking embarrassment to troll-kind.

        5. This forum is for men. Women are not technically allowed to comment here. Apparently the moderators have been getting slack.

        6. What are you scared of? Just ignore comments you don’t want to engage with. It’s not difficult just try to be brave.

        7. This is a forum for men. It is not open to women or homosexuals. Its not my rule, its the forum rules. I could be banned just for replying to you.

        8. Well I’m here anyway. If I were you I wouldn’t risk replying, sounds like it could lead to ‘serious’ consequences!

  26. These women are the best women in the world. Sure they are not as good as men but that’s no reason to be so insulting. Good for them for becoming women’s champions.

    1. Do they deserve the same accolades when they are inferior…the same pay when “professional”?

    2. I know. This article is retarded. Should we not give awards to the best spelling B kid in the age 10 and under group bc anyone our age can outspell him? This is a new ROK low

    3. Meh…I would agree with you 50 years ago. But now we live in an era where the feminazi propaganda machine operates 24/7.
      Therefore, I no longer have empathy.

  27. Wow, this article was worth it for the Isle of Man free-runner video alone. Wow, just wow!

  28. 10.49 s – Florence Griffith Joyner (Women’s)
    ———————————
    In the Ontario high school T&F championships, the male 100m winner beats this time…he’s only 16….and a nobody going probably nowhere…..no cereal box cover, no money, no fame….for being better than the world record holding female. EQUALITY!!!

  29. Wow can’t believe that article was published in The Atlantic ?? The Atlantic does occasionally let a heretical article in every now and then. I believe Christopher Hitchens wrote for that magazine….

  30. Having the olympics, and all other sports, mixed sex has so many advantages, one is the one implied by this is that we will only see the best in the world which is what we want, there will be no dealing with trannies as the competition is open to all and doesn’t matter what is between their legs or what they think is there, and it will save time and money as less events will need to be held, there is less tv time, plus I am sure there are more that I have missed

    1. But what if people don’t ACTUALLY want to see the best in the world? What if it’s only closet homosexuals making that excuse because they can’t admit the real reason to themselves out of insecurity? What if most people want to see the best of each sex competing instead?
      As a heterosexual man, I wouldn’t even bother to watch the gymnastics if it was mixed sex. Only homosexuals would do that.
      In fact, I doubt I’d watch the Olympics at all if they were mixed sex. I’d just seek out women’s sporting events elsewhere.

  31. Nobody thinks female Olympians aren’t good athletes in the
    sense that they’re the best women, or even that they’re not better than most
    men in their particular area of expertise. But the Olympics is not
    supposed to be about who’s GOOD, but rather who’s the BEST in the WORLD.
    The simple fact is that in nearly any activity that requires physicality, the
    best women in the world are comparable to the best 12-13 year old boys.
    It’s really as simple as that, yet we give real gold medals and real winner’s
    purses to women who could not hope to compete against their male counterparts.
    Both the male and female winners at Wimbledon receive equal prizes, but if they
    had to compete head-to-head the only women at Center Court would be
    spectators. Look, female athletes are generally pleasant to look at, and anything that keeps women from being fat is probably a net positive, but what grinds my gears is that they take their affirmative action wins and claim that proves equality.
    It doesn’t.

      1. All female Olympic weightlifters are stronger than almost all men.
        Tell me, do you think women should also be excluded from bikini modeling competitions? Miss Universe? You’d like to see men winning those wouldn’t you?

        1. Liking to watch female athletes because you think they are sexy is one thing. But reality is top female athletes would get beat by male high school athletes. There is no reason to watch female athletes for their sport accomplishments.

        2. How does men being better undermine the quality of female sports in any way?
          At what point does anybody sit down to watch female sports for the purpose of seeing females out-compete men?! What kind of fucking retarded idiot are you?!
          The purpose of female sports is to show the best FEMALES in the world, duh.

        3. I thought we were all about equality. Why identify with being female so much?
          Why not create Olympics for paraplegics? And then for female paraplegics? And then for black female paraplegics? And then for fat black female paraplegics? And then for transsexuals?
          At mod: She is kinda annoying. Might wanna watch her.

        4. I’m about common fucking sense. Saying sports should be mixed sex is just misogyny birthed by sexual insecurity.

        5. I’m about common fucking sense. Saying sports should be mixed sex is just misogyny birthed by sexual insecurity.

        6. And what does “at mod” mean? Are you flagging my posts because I’m sick of homosexuals who can’t admit they’re gay?
          I’m a “he”, anyway.

        7. I wasn’t saying we should get rid of women in sports, I was just using that to point out that we need separate sports classes for men and women.

        8. Why is separate sex misogyny? That’s another faggot-in-denial argument. Use common sense.

        9. You’re the one who does reiki and other New Age shit that’s meant for aging single women…

        10. Male comments get deleted while females are allowed to troll. Is ROK in decline now?

        11. What type of dumb assed argument is that!? Bikini modeling isn’t a SPORT. Nor Miss Universe. In fact for your stunted argument to even make a smidgen of sense you should be arguing in favor of male swim suit competitions or a male Beauty pageant.
          Thanks for proving that even in a conversational debate, the average woman is still inferior to the average man.

        12. I’m a man, which makes you an idiot.
          I wasn’t saying bikini modeling is a sport. I was just pointing out that men who dislike women in sports also probably prefer to see men in bikinis, not women.
          Wonderful comprehension skills you’ve got there!

        13. Yes I have. Here’s one: You just want male-only sports because you secretly like perving on men. What other logical explanation could there be?!

        14. When you have a team winning the women’s world cup in soccer/football being obliterated by 17 year old high school boys the argument ends right there-the team I played for at at under 16 level would have absolutely kicked their asses and beat them badly physically also-we would relished pummelling you in the score and for stepping up to us. Good times.

        15. Which part? The average man can’t even bench press 80 kilos, let alone snatch it overhead – which is what the women’s 48 kilo category was doing today.
          Yes, most chick weightlifters are stronger than almost all men.

        16. No. They are not. The average female weightlifter is not no stronger than almost all men. The average female weightlifter merely trains more than the average man. The average man has much greater strength potential and hence is stronger.

        17. I’m not talking about potential; I’m talking about ability. The person who can move the most weight is the strongest; not the person who could move the most weight if he wasn’t a fat, lazy sack of shit who wastes his life eating nachos and insulting professional athletes online.

        18. Miss 48kg probably can’t bench press 80kg either…..A lot of olympic weightlifting is based on technique and mechanics, not strength per se. Also these women train constantly and many take PEDs. If Olympic lifters are really the strongest(not merely the best at olympic lifting) why arent more of them also the best powerlifters and strongmen? For that matter why arent more of them the best fighters and NFL players etc? There is certainly more money and recognition in those sports…..
          How many men have ever even peformed a snatch? not a large percentage. Little miss 48kg would get broken in half by most men in a fight or bench pressing competition, that have never peformed a snatch or clean and jerk in their life. Snatches and clean and jerks are technical “cheat” lifts anyways, its not something you’d ever peform in the gym to actually build muscle and strength. Far from it you would religiously train a variety of other excersises including the squat, front squat etc to gain the strength to peform a heavy clean a jerk.

        19. I should’ve said “front squat” and not “bench press”. The snatch and clean and jerk aren’t upper body-dominant lifts, no. Yet you still require awesome overall strength and maximum lower body strength to excel.
          Simply put, if you can’t front squat a weight then you sure as fuck can’t snatch nor clean and jerk it.
          And no, most men can’t front squat 80 kilos, either. Yet these female Olympians can all exceed that.
          The Olympic weightlifters ARE the strongest in the world in their weight classes. If you followed the training then you’d know this.
          I remember Hossein Rezazedah dead lifting and back squating 400 kilos for multiple reps. I’ve never seen any strongmen nor power lifters back squat that weight. Olympians also have the highest front squat records without question.
          Snatch and clean and jerk aren’t cheat lifts. They require precise technique and maximum power along with raw strength, but they can’t be accomplished without the strength foundation.
          What does fighting ability have to do with anything? Punching a 48 kilo girl in the face won’t prove you’re stronger than her; it’ll only prove you don’t know what strength is.
          The football comment is also absurdly retarded. They’re completely different sports with completely different requirements.
          Not all Olympians are on steroids. Yet that’s not a female exclusive problem anyway, so what?
          Finally, the training programs for weightlifting varies from country to country. Yet the Bulgarians, the best, trained only front squat, snatch, and clean and jerk, with some power snatch and power clean thrown in, and they became phenomenally strong and had huge front squat records. But yeah, they had to smash the front squat to build a strength foundation.
          Anyway, what’s your point? 48 kilo Olympian chicks can out-snatch and out-front squat most men on the planet, so what?
          Frankly, they’d probably give most men a run for their money on the bench press too, but I’m not entirely certain. Most men would struggle to bench just 40 kilos, you know, because most men don’t train. I reckon these chicks could beat that easily.

        20. The comparison to fighting and NFL is relevant because You dont get to decide what is the measure of “strength”, or define it as ability to squat or front squat or whatever or a very specific technical event like the snatch or clean and jerk. That is just the ability to lift a weight in a very specific way with a very specific technique and mechanics…… Strength can be pullng a heavy sled, farmers walking with your own bodyweight in each hand, pushing someone over or wrestling them to the ground etc. You have decided to define it very specifically and claim that women who train for a very specific, explosive, technique heavy and not totally strength related event as stronger than men who dont and have no need to train for that event…..that is what is stupid.

        21. No. You’re absolutely full of shit, and you’re just looking for ways to dismiss the fact that some women are stronger than you.
          Strength can be loosely defined as the ability to move a heavy weight regardless of the time it takes to move it.
          (Power is the ability to move a heavy weight with speed.)
          Fighting is the ability to overcome an opponent in combat.
          There’s no confusing the two, not unless you’re confusing them deliberately out of insecurity.
          Yet to suggest, “Strength cannot be defined, therefore the Olympian chicks aren’t stronger than me just because they can out-lift me,” proves nothing but you’re a weak-minded, insecure coward who couldn’t even look Sopita Tanasan in the eye, let alone get her bar over your head.
          Grow some fucking balls.

        22. Paraplegics with glasses, paraplegics who prefer iced tea to wine, non paraplegics who identify as paraplegics etc. That’s an inexhaustible list.

        23. Why are you so worked up about this?…..Everyone knows that no one is training their snatch or clean and jerk to improve their strength or peformance in anything but the snatch and clean and jerk….THAT IS THE EVENT. I’ve said the same about the bench press(which i am VERY good at) and powerlifting in another article this month. It doesnt mean you are stronger than anybody except by that specific lift, which you may be specifically mechanically built for or have trained since 12 years old for.
          And the point i made stands, if olympic weightlifters were the strength athletes you believe them to be, more of them would find a way to be competing in some other sport that actually generates revenue. Nobody cares about olympic lifting, wrestling, mens gymnastics etc….we all know these are not the best athletes most countries have to offer, due to money factor and other cultural/social factors that in most countries children are not taught these sports at school and would have to go out of their way to develop and interest or pursue them. There is a reason the host nation often has a good showing at the olympics, because they spend money on the facilities and the athletes so they medal in obscure sports no one else even competes in……

        24. I don’t think you understand much about any athletic training.
          Power snatch, power clean, snatch, and clean and jerk are the primary lifts for any athlete who trains to develop power.
          These lifts form the bulk of training for sports such as shot put and discus, and every footballer is familiar with them.
          Olympic weightlifters don’t become football super stars because strength alone doesn’t make a good footballer. How hard is that to understand?
          And to suggest that a man like Hossein Rezazedah with a 400+ kilo back squat who’s one of the strongest men who have ever lived is not necessarily strong is absolutely retarded. How else do you define strength? You’re just dismissing putting a definition on strength to suit your own ends. It’s retarded. You’re an insecure piece of shit.
          Strength is the ability to lift fucking heavy shit. That’s what the word means, okay. So fuck off with your dismissals.
          I’ve explained that the Olympian chicks can both lift heavy in the Oly lifts and also in the more raw strength-based front squat lifts, and they can deadlift heavy too. That’s strong. That’s what strength is.
          I get worked up about it because Return of Kings isn’t a site for liars. It isn’t a site for cowards. It isn’t a site for men without balls. This is meant to be a site for men who have the balls to face up to the world and admit the truth – even if that means admitting a 48 kilo chick is stronger than you. It’s a site for men who can look women in the eye, not shy away from the reality of what women are.
          Yet this thread is full of closet homosexuals and insecure cowards. It’s disgusting. I spit on them, and I spit on you. And why shouldn’t I? You’re not half the man I am. You’re scared of reality, scared of the truth; and how are you going to better yourself like that?
          Swallow your balls, and put some concrete on your cereal and harden the fuck up.
          Until you at least admit what strength is, get the fuck out of my sight.

        25. WHY ARE YOU SO MAD. The point is that Strength alone doesnt make a good Olympic lifter either….especially when it comes to a 48kg woman. Compare the super heavyweight world record to others…Hossein isnt snatching or clean jerking anywhere near twice as much weight as the guys he weighs twice as much as, but he could probably farmers walk or sled pull MORE than twice as much weight as they could….there are different measure of strength! and clearly olympic lifting favours technique/body mechanics heavily. The force travelling through the centre line of the body into he ground allows smaller/lighter people to be more competitive with heaviier ones for instance. A 120+kg Shotputter might clean and jerk 170kg, which is what an elite 56kg weightlifter lifts. Is Om Yun Chol stronger than elite Shotputters?
          Shot putters and discus throwers all bench press like 190kg+ as well, and do all kinds of training, clean jerk and power snatch is less common than you might think, certainly with consderable weight, and likely inferior to the Push Press. Shot putters sprint and jump hurdles, ive seen them hit tyres with hammers, jump rope, one arm pushups, so what? There is also a big difference between training a lift for sports conditioning (of which there are a limited amount of barbell lifts one could even train) and attempting to build the highest possible maximum. many athletes bench press, how many of them are trying to max bench 600lbs at any cost?…and how would that help their strength for their sport? and would that really make them any stronger than their competition or someone else other than BY THE STANDARD OF MAXIMUM BENCH PRESS.
          Hossein weighs over 150kgs and snatches over 200kg….that’s a damn sight dfferent from suggesting that a 48kg woman who snatches 80kg is stronger than most men. NEWSFLASH world record weightlifter who weighs 150kg stronger than most people, who would have thought it!! next time mention Tatirana Kashirina if you want to make dudes feel inadequate. An 80kg snatch is not impressive, and most would have trouble only with the felxibility required in the long run.
          I can clean and strict standing overhead press more than 80kgs….not even hard, no fucks given. Its a mechanically harder lift, but who gives a fuck how strong i am anyway apart from you?

        26. One thing that often gets forgotten in such conversations is the importance of height. The taller you are, the more work you have to do to get the weight up, which is why it might make more sense to have height classes instead of weight classes. They have already accommodated women by giving them thinner barbells, which requires less grip strength or/and smaller hands. If you’re not tall enough, you cannot succeed in a strongman competition or sports like shot put and especially discus throw. I’m not sure if a short female weightlifter would throw the discus farther or throw a harder hook than a male volleyball player. Most of the time the super strong women that you hear about are significantly shorter than the average grown man, which makes strength comparisons tricky.

        27. Exactly. It’s admirable that they have the dedication, drive, and commitment to make the sacrifices needed to become the best in their sport. Most of us here, including myself, couldn’t do that. So belittling them for doing something that most of us here could never do really shows the mentallty of some people on this site.

        28. My point is that these women are evidently stronger than you, but you lack the balls to admit it.
          You would be unable to place 80+ kilos over your head using any technique, but they can = stronger.
          Your lack of courage is sickening.

        29. The comparison isn’t the best women in the world vs your average male…outlier much? The comparison is the best female in the world vs the best male. Men win every god damn time ffs. Compare your average woman vs your average man. Men win every god damn time.
          Analogy. I’m over 40, can still run a sub 5 minute mile. Pretty damn good for mybage. I can absolutely trounce any recreational runner …this No fucking accomplishment for me, none. The best woman miler could smoke me, no real accomplishment for her….so just imagine how big of a non accomplishment for thee best women athlete in the world to beat Joe schmoe. Zilch.
          The reason the teen boys soccer team was brought up is because they are at the elite level for THEIR age, not having fully matured yet. So in essence, for soccer, the best adult females are equivalent to the best teenage boys . Id suspect the same if you did your powerlifting comparison the correct way.

        30. “All female Olympic weightlifters are stronger than almost all men.”
          Is there something unclear about what I’m saying in this sentence?

        31. Is there something unclear about mine bitch? You’re comparing outliers to normal ass people.
          It’s like bragging that you breathe.

        32. It was my intention to compare professional female athletes to normal men because it was relevant to the conversation I was having.

        33. Did this actually happen somewhere or are you fantasizing? Can you provide a link please?

    1. Hmmm. I’m a woman, and I don’t entirely agree with you, but I don’t entirely disagree with you either. The Olympics are in theory, amateur sport. So, we have women and men competing in their respective classes, which is fair. Now, women cannot out compete men physically, that much is true. As for the prize money, and with respect to the Olympics, this has more to do with the popularity of the sport rather than the sex competing, some sports are sexier than others. So, a woman gymnast will get more $ than the male (or female) “shot putter” sp?? I did compete athletically in my youth, not at an Olympic level, but higher than most will ever achieve. The thing is, female athletes have never been about affirmative action or some kind of legislated equality. Anyone who has ever competed physically knows the limits/differences between male and female bodies. It’s never been about that. It’s about pushing your body and mind to its limits. A good message for all, no?

      1. The Olympics isn’t amateur, you dumb ho. It’s full of professional career athletes. They’re world class.

        1. That’s why she said ‘in theory’, because it is supposed to be amateur, in theory.
          The reality is that the modern Olympics is anything but amateur. Due to the hype and coverage surrounding the event, you get people working year in, year out becoming freakishly skilled at whatever event they’re competing in for the two weeks that come every four years. People like Usain Bolt are marketed for about a thousand days before the actual event, and pro sportspeople like Neymar and Sonny Bill Williams are lured by the IOC to compete for an olympic gold medal.
          When you get paid sportspeople to come to your event, it inevitably turns into a massive commercial machine, which the Olympics weren’t supposed to be, because it’s supposed to be for the love of sports.
          The IOC, like FIFA, is kidding itself that it’s about the love of sports though, i.e amateur. Hasn’t been like that since the 60’s.
          More here: http://edition.cnn.com/2012/07/22/opinion/greene-olympics-amateurs/

        2. Um, no, it’s not. 10W40 and 10W10 are labels too, try using both in your Ford in winter.

        3. The original intent of the Olympics was for only amateur athletes to compete. Competitors caught accepting money were banned and medals stripped. Most notably Jim Thorpe sp? A highly decorated decathlon competitor, and to this day probably one of America’s best athletes, who had his medals stripped because he had once accepted money to play a sport he wasn’t even competing in. (I think it was basketball but I could be wrong) The rules started to bend a LITTLE when the games became more widely televised, but even then it was fairly regulated. It wasn’t until the mid 80s (or maybe even later) that the floodgates opened and you had entire professional teams competing. That forever changed the games, and not in a positive direction if you ask me.

        4. Yeah, you’re right. I think it was the 60s when they started to bend the rules and the 80s or so when it really opened up. The IOC/FIFA are so fucking corrupt it’s laughable. At least FIFA TRIED to be somewhat discreet about it. Look at the IOC’s latest move: we won’t ban all the Russian athletes, just the disabled ones. Am I supposed to believe it was the paralympians who were at the heart of the doping scandal? Or maybe it’s because the Russians bring $ the games….and it’s a moot point whether or not they show up at the Paralympics. Sad but true. This why I always have a soft spot for the athletes who compete in unpopular events: they really are doing it for the love of the sport.

      2. Emmet you’re alright. you have very agreeable points. Just a debating tip when dealing with men or people: don’t end your point with a question, and/or validation seeking. “a good message for all, no?” is begging others to agree with you, begging for validation and makes you look insecure even though your points crush the person you were responding to.
        totally right, what female athlete is asking for legislative equality or affirmitive action? The ONE TIME I heard title IX being used was when it was clear that the women had subpar and second rate facilities. Ronda Rousy says it straight with women fighters and athletes will get paid based on the tickets sales they bring in. Serena Williams is a dominating athlete, too bad she’s not sexually attractive to the most of the world, thus less sponsors. Recognizing that a woman is the best in her class? sure. Praising her? sure why not. Paying the Minnesota Lynx as much as the Minnnesota Timberwolves even though they’ve been dominant and the only winning Minnesota team in decades? Ticket sales and economics say no.

        1. Thanks for the tip! And you are 100% correct. Athletes get paid based on viewership. Period. Ronda Rousy is making Dana some cold hard cash, and she will continue to be promoted as long as Dana boy is getting paid. There have been plenty of smoking hot female tennis stars who were far less talented than Serena but made boat loads of cash because people wanted to imagine them naked. Those examples however are professional athletes and the Olympics is supposed to be about amateur sport. It’s too bad that the world stage isn’t equal in that respect, and this has nothing to do with the sex of the athletes. Michael Phelps is able to make enough $ to train full time. Other athletes, from other countries, or who compete in less popular sports, don’t have that luxury. But I digress.

      3. Thanks for proving once again that generally, women contribute next to nothing to a decent converstaion.
        You agreed and then disagreed with the previous post, then stated something as an experienced based revelation – that those who compete physically understand the difference between male vs female athletic ability – as if everyone commenting didn’the already know that as a unspoken truth.

        1. No. I was agreeing with him that women can’t physically compete with men, but the money Olympic athletes are able to make has more to do with the popularity of the sport, rather than raw ability. Guaranteed Michael Phelps makes significantly more money from sponsorships than a gold medal ski shooter. That doesn’t necessarily make him a better athlete, it means he competes in a popular sport that gets more attention. Ergo more advertising bang for the sponsor’s bucks. I then went on to say that female athletes themselves have never suggested they could outcompete men. And I don’t believe the inability to physically compete with a man has, or should, stop a woman from wanting to push herself to her physical limits. Based on that logic a featherweight prize fighter should just give up, as he could never beat a heavyweight.

    2. They know who the best in the world are. It’s the Russians.
      That’s why the Russians were blackballed.

      1. Yeah, I find the hypocrisy of the Russian doping story to be so anti red pill. Are the Kenyans not doping? The Jamaicans? The Chinese.
        No. No. Just the evil Russians.

    3. Because it’s recognizing greatness within each group, not total. Clearly you just don’t want women to receive attention for any sort of accomplishment. Well boo fucking boo,

      1. “Recognizing greatness” – what a joke. Check the world records for nearly any sporting event, and compare them to the US boys high school records for the same events and get back to me about “greatness” when it comes to women’s sports. Its not “recognizing greatness” in real terms – it’s only looking at ONE group: women. Why not categories for skin color, or height, or age, or left-handedness versus right-handedness, or ear-lobes versus non ear-lobes? The answer is that it’s supposed to be about who’s the best – not who’s the best in which demographic category. Women demand equality for good stuff and special treatment in everything else. You want to hear boo-hooing? Listen to feminists any time they have to check their female privilege and they end up getting treated like men. You’ll get an ear-full.

    4. Yes, it is the constant need to make (degrade) the accomplishment into some prog point about some unnatural notion like equality.
      All of which are really just tedious attempts to drag the accomplishments of men down. The dissonance – as usual, is striking, when the rotting corpses of the leftist dogma are dragged onto a world stage – a stage that is all about discerning what constitutes the best, judging the differences among people performing the same set of skills, and ultimately rewarding those who prove their unequal status for all to watch and celebrate.
      The lameness of all this go-girl sporty-sport business is not so much about their attempts to sell the lie that women can be like men (nobody really believes that) but rather how the narrative pushers ignore the fact that despite the raw numbers of women competing the overall level of competition is still paltry.
      The # of women globally who train and compete in most sports is nominal compared to the # of men. The relative competition is just nowhere near the same for women as it is for men. Forget women against men; women against other women produces embarrassing disparity even at the highest levels.
      I’ve coached a collegiate women’s team sport (that is also played in the Olympics) and the competition was pathetic. We had women on a collegiate team who had never played before college. But they still took third nationally in their division. I’m not that great of a coach. The level of play was so poor across the board that my beloved sport was barely recognizable. But the egos that sprouted from those birds was all too familiar.
      And since we have title IX, a recreational group-hug for mediocre female “athletes” is all the pear-shaped administrators need to pat themselves on the back and drag out all of those tropes about equality and vaginas. Well, that is after they cut a successful men’s sport to make room for these fine athletes.

      1. Yesterday my brother called me on the phone to ask me to look up a website that posts race results from all over the country (he was having computer problems). I’m in my mid-50s and he’s in his late-50’s. A couple of days ago he ran a triathlon (with hundreds of contestants) and wanted to get his split times. We’ve both always been athletic, but this was only his second such event, and he finished in the bottom half of his division. He also asked me to look up the results of an acquaintance of his because they got separated after the race and he didn’t get to talk to her. It turns out that she finished about 90 seconds ahead of him, but here’s the important thing: that performance was good enough to WIN her division (Female 20-24). Think about that: the woman who came in FIRST among 20-24 year old women just barely beat an inexperienced guy who finished in the BOTTOM HALF among 55-59 year old men. That’s a “very good” female athlete at the athletic prime of her life running neck-and-neck with a guy who got beat by most of the guys in the “Old Enough To Be Her Father” Division.
        Few people understand how different the sexes really are, largely thanks to feminist lies. I wasn’t exaggerating when I noted that the best female athletes in the world are comparable to the best 12-13 year old boys. A glance through the record books easily proves it: once males reach puberty they beat women at everything but gestating fetuses. That’s even true of non-physical things: all the best chess players are men, too, as one example among thousands.
        The big sports story a few weeks ago was the pummeling that a group of amateur boys gave to the New Zealand national women’s soccer team. There are literally hundreds of thousands of men who are better than every single female “Olympian” in every sport… yet only the very best are in Rio.

  32. They’ve gotten rid of gender verification. I’m just waiting on trans gendered whatevers to destroy women’s sports. SJW heads will just explode when men or women that take testosterone start to dominate and they have to admit gender is not one’s state of mind to bring back gender testing.

    1. Did you not read about the MMA transgender fighter who utterly annihilated her opponent in what viewers called a beatdown? And a strong female MMA fighter refused to fight the TG fighter?
      http://www.libertynewsnow.com/transgender-female-mma-fighter-brutally-injures-female-opponent/article1545
      Or a TG who competed on a girls’ track team and won a state championship?
      http://www.libertynewsnow.com/transgender-athlete-beats-girls-to-claim-victory-in-state-championships/article4611

    2. This transgender movement will be the death of female sports. It is utterly stupid. The final objective is to do away with gender all together and cause confusion. Strangely countries outside the West will continue with rigid gender rules, continue to reproduce, and eventually flood the west with immigrants until the west is dead.

  33. RoK is playing the faggot card. It’s sad. I like watching the female athletes because they’re sexy (most of them, anyway). I’m especially looking forwards to the gymnastics, as always.
    Here’s an Ethiopian honey who won gold in long distance last Olympics. She’s in Rio again now. Tirunesh Dibaba::
    https://media.aws.iaaf.org/media/LargeL/0414b884-77ab-4567-a550-52b77520ec42.jpg?v=-1856901636
    http://www.ethiosports.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Tirunesh-Dibaba-Baby.jpg
    You guys have fun jacking off to the male athletes, though.

      1. It’s been a common theme in a few recent articles – in order to defend their masculinity, writers are attacking women and homosexuals. Yet that’s not masculinity; it’s insecurity.
        I’m worried this site is attracting closet homosexuals who feel the need to protect their masculinity (and they’re failing miserably).
        If girls want to put on tights and run in circles around a field then a real man would let them. I’ll be drinking beer and staring at their asses the entire race.

    1. Are you taking the piss? That’s the chick you use an example?
      She has no breasts, a huge forehead, long ass fingers and is remarkably not noteworthy.

      1. I think Dibaba is hot. She’s certainly well above average.
        Feel free to post photos of your own sweetheart athletes.

        1. Dude, I say this straight up but, you reek of self loathing. Seriously, your posts come across as someone who has some internal conflicts and is running from his identity.

        2. How so? You ought to elaborate.
          I’m very happy with myself and my life, actually.
          There are other people here with real problems – some of them can’t admit that a woman is stronger than them, others are in denial about the dismal state of the Caucasian race. I’m glad that I’m not one of them.

  34. Y’all are just mad because any of these women would kick your asses at sports.

  35. I looked it up a couple years agog when digging up facts related to the whole “hit like a girl” ad.
    The current world record holder for the women’s 100m freestyle swim would not qualify, based on that time, to even TRY OUT for the US men’s swim team.

      1. Thank you captain obvious.. But what is the mass media and gatekeeper position on “girls can do anything men can just as well” these days despite the evidence in front of our eyes? Or towards anyone using “hit like a girl” to indicate “weakly”?

        1. What do those statements have to do with this?
          Yes, feminists lie about the capabilities of females. Feminist retardation has nothing to do with female sports.
          As for “hit like a girl”, when did I dispute that girls can’t punch for shit? And what does female weakness in comparison to male strength have to do with female-only sports?

        2. I blocked that idiot-you’d be best doing so so you don’t insult your intelligence further.

        3. My god, grow some fucking brain cells. There’s a little concept called relativity.

        4. Oh. Really? Thank you so much for educating me on the concept that relative to one thing, another may be different.
          I went through all of my life without understanding that, until the bright day when the clouds opened up, a ray of sunlight fell upon me, the planets sang, and enlightenment came to me with your words.
          Or, perhaps I’m pointing out that they ARE different, and it is verboten in PC circles to even acknowledge that if it might, subjectively, make anyone in a favored victim class feel bad. In the meantime you don’t have the reading comprehension of a flailing cockroach stuck on its back.

  36. http://www.exrx.net/Testing/WeightLifting/StrengthStandards.html
    Look at any of those exercises. Look at the differences between men and women.
    Deadlift:
    A 200 lbs man should deadlift 335 lbs to be “intermediate”
    A 199+ lbs woman needs to deadlift 300 lbs just to be “ADVANCED”
    A 200 lbs man deadlifts 565 lbs to be “Elite”, while a 200 lbs woman, 365 lbs is considered elite.
    Squat:
    A 200 lbs man should squat 285 lbs to be “intermediate”, 300 lbs should be doable eventually.
    A 199+ lbs woman should squat 305 lbs to be considered “ELITE”
    Overhead Press:
    A 200 lbs guy should press 145 lbs to be considered “intermediate” 160 lbs is reachable by that kind of guy with a lot of effort.
    A 199+ lbs woman should overhead press 160 lbs to be considered “ELITE”
    Bench Press… It’s no contest.
    A 200 lbs man should bench 215 lbs to be “intermediate”.
    A 199+ lbs woman… Bench pressing 220 lbs is considered “ELITE”, that’s with proper form, no half-repping.
    If someone brings up Becca Swanson, who deadlifted 683 lbs, bench pressed 480 lbs, I would point them to Scot Mendelson who bench pressed over 1000 lbs, and deadlifted 800 lbs.
    Men are stronger. It is a cold-hard fact of biology.

    1. While, IMO Mendelson and swanson bring a little extra “gear” in their gym bag with them when they lift. An Elite male Natural athlete is still easily capable of catching and surpassing Swanson. The Strongman Goerner(1930’s) , could military press (on record) 253.5 lbs overhead, he could also deadlift with one hand 730lbs and officially had performed the same feat with 663lbs. He also performed a DL with 1 man standing on each end of a barbell that had 441lbs already on it , the combined weight totaled 830lbs

    2. No shit, retard. That’s why women and men compete separately. Are you really that fucking stupid?

  37. Women’s sports just need to be seen for what it is women’s sports. I like watching the women’s gymnastics and some of the other sports just to check out the babes.
    I watch the men’s sports for the chance to see an actual best ever performance.

  38. While the equal opportunity and affirmative action athletes can look forward to gold medals just for showing up, any and every excuse has been found to make sure the true cream of the crop—the Russians—are unable to humiliate the faggots that pass for the top athletes of most western nations
    The last thing our masters want is to have the world reminded that Russia’s young men are the ones best prepared to fight wars—and win them.

  39. Besides the Strength and Power advantage Men have over women There is another aspect of female anatomy which causes women to be at a disadvantage athletically compared to Men, that is rarely mentioned, the following is an excerpt from “Biomechanical Basis of Human Movement (third edition)”: “Estrogen levels in anorexic women and amenorrheic female athletes have also been related to the presence of osteoporosis in this population. There is speculation that stress fractures in the femoral neck of female runners may be related to a noted loss of bone mineral density caused by osteoporosis. Elite female athletes in a variety of sports have had bone loss, usually associated with bouts of heavy training and associated menstrual irregularity. Some of these athletes have lost so much bone mass that their skeletal characteristics resemble those of elderly women.”
    .
    Essentially, elite female athletes , can cause their menstrual cycles to become irregular to the point that a self induced osteoporosis occurs due to significantly low estrogen levels brought on by intense and hard training. Not only are women physically weaker in strength and power compared to Men, but women do not posses the capability to withstand the Stress and hardship that is brought upon the body by Intense training.

        1. Yes, so the US has some total sluts on its team, what a fucking surprise!
          But you do realize that not ALL female athletes pose like that, right?

        2. Lets say there are 15 days for the olympic games, 1-2 men per day, plus party (orgy) nights. What’s her olympic score in notch count?

        3. What’s your point? Honestly? Not all female athletes are slobs, as I pointed out before.
          Are you recommending I get lipo suction on my brain if I want to fit in here at RoK?

        4. Nothing says strong empowered woman who doesn’t need to sexually objectify herself to advance her career, like posing half naked in a photo shoot.

        5. 450,000 condoms delivered to athlete’s olympic village and its just opening night. Those aren’t getting used on a handful of female athletes.

        6. So you’re basically saying that it doesn’t matter who you are, the Olympic Village magically reprograms you to sluttiness?
          You’re a delusional, insecure closet homosexual. Do us all a favor and put a cock in your mouth like you want.

        7. Only 3 women in each sport are going to win a medal. They already know that going in. The rest are just there to get fucked by as much alpha cock as possible while they are there. Its already started. Opening night is a big party/orgy. This is the true nature of women, the lizard brain impulses, in the absence of social constraints. These red pill truths cant be denied. AWALT.

        8. So you’re basically saying that it doesn’t matter who you are, the Olympic Village magically reprograms you to sluttiness?
          You’re a delusional, insecure closet homosexual. Do us all a favor and put a cock in your mouth like you want.

        9. Its not just the US team. i only know one female athlete that competed at the international level and she admitted clocking up a lot of athlete cock (included multi sessions) on her trips overseas that she competed in and that was 20 odd yrs ago. Its a bit like what happens on tour stays on tour, when it comes to the athletes blabbing about who/how many they shagged. Status at the olympics count like in the real world from what I read and one of the perks for a male winning is female athletes wanting to bag a medal winner. The number of condoms getting handed out at the olympics is growing more with each one, well outstripping the growth in female competitors and also well outstripping the number of single women competing. Someone is using them and highly doubt its mostly the gay gays there.

        10. You could say the same about men – that most just came for the cock. No doubt you drool over the idea, but that doesn’t make it true.
          You’re a shit troll. I won’t reply to you on this subject anymore.

        11. These truths are difficult to internalize. Men are there for the sport. Without male athletes there could be no olympics, there would be no audience. Women are an olympic sideshow who are ultimately there for the men. Cum dumpsters.

        12. This isn’t relevant to the individual female athlete. You’re dumb if you can’t see that. Still, I do acknowledge that the number of sluts per capita is on the rise, sadly.

        13. The ones that don’t aren’t placing anywhere near men in time/strength either. So…

        14. Depends. For the single female athlete competing the bed hoping these days is very much part of the event now behind the scenes. Even if an individual is not doing it numerous of her teammates are. Where it is not relevant is in relation to the original article on the merit of women competing at the Olympics. Women competing with men at the sport event is a bit ridiculous when we know what the outcome will be. Being the fastest, strongest, most accurate, most talented or whatever woman in the world is hardly a merit-less achievement. Like the flyweight boxer getting a medal is going to feel disappointed that he would not beat the heavyweight boxer who won a medal. The millions of people watching the Olympics I believe enjoy the spectacle of competition regardless of the gender in the event.

        15. It’s really dumb to make the women’s achievement so relative, though. Human men aren’t near as strong as gorillas if you want to expand the category a bit more. Yet only an idiot compares a man to a gorilla… which is my point.

        16. You do realize what it takes to even quality to get to the Olympics, yes? These athletes aren’t going because they want to party, they’re going because they want to win. Anything else is secondary/bonus.

        17. Said by a beta you could never score any ympic women nore could you compete against them

      1. But you would never be able to get that unless you look like an Olympic athlete yourself

  40. I’m watching the women’s soccer right now. NZ vs Columbia. There’s some hotties on the field for sure… not that you fags would care, but my cock is rock hard at the sight of all those tight little hips!

  41. I am thinking of becoming a trans to get ahead in athletics (I’m being satirical here). This is the world that the left want so why not take full advantage of it. Women are men, men are women!!!!

  42. The only thing the Olympics prove are that our Dykes are better than their Dykes.

  43. Lol someone is pissy that he will never be as attractive or even strong as those female athletes. Sure the male athletes can beat them, but you? HAHAHAHAHA, not a snowball’s hope in hell.

    1. Women’s basketball and women’s soccer. The average men of the same age group will defeat the best women in these sports. Basically women suck so bad at basketball and soccer that high school boys can beat them.

        1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3609949/Matildas-lose-7-0-Newcastle-Jets-15s-Rio-Olympics-warm-up.html
          http://nesn.com/2014/01/u-s-womens-olympic-hockey-team-preparing-for-sochi-games-by-playing-boys-high-school-teams-in-new-england/
          Please spare me your condescending comments. It is a basic fact men are stronger, more athletic, and faster than women. We each have a different purpose in life. Disregard everything your Woman’s Studies professor taught you and except reality. Grow your hair long, stay in shape, don’t get any tattoos, don’t color your hair a funny color it looks childish, don’t be bossy, be feminine. Find a man, get married, quit your job, and make babies, before it’s to late.

        2. Not disputing that men are more physically strong and fast. As for everything else…well, there’s a reason the women’s movement happened. YOU may want women to do those things, but WOMEN want options. Some love being a SAHM, others want a career. There’s room in the world for both.

        3. Yes, there certainly is, and I’m a woman who belongs to the latter category. That said, what I don’t like is when career women (such as myself) put down women who chose to be SAHM. As though choosing that path is somehow weaker. It isn’t. God knows someone’s got to produce the next generation, thanks ladies for taking one the team as far as I’m concerned. I don’t disagree with a lot of what’s discussed on this site but some of the commentators are ridiculous. They don’t want fat women, but they don’t want them too athletic either. They rip up female athletes for being butchy, and then turn around and equally rip up those who have posed sexily for calendars, magazines etc… Good looking athletes are objectified, and why wouldn’t they be? David Beckham wasn’t modeling his career stats for H&M.

        1. Yes I can and I suck at basketball. Soccer would be easy. I know that it’s a hard concept for you but women are not equal to men. This must really get under your skin. Rather than embrace the differences, you insist on believing the lie that you have been taught be TV and your useless teachers who programmed you to pursue a career rather than marriage and children. Good luck, be sure to bore your dates when you tell them about your career goals.

      1. And also compare those highschool boys to the guys in the Olympics see a difference because they have the same physic isn’t it already clear to you why women go against other women yeah crazy concept i know

  44. the only Olympic event where men & women can compete on equal footing is equestrian.. and that’s because they’re both astride a large animal who’s doing all the hard work.

  45. Ha. Female sports can be summed up in one sentance: “our lesbians are stronger/ faster/ better than yours.”

  46. A timely article. The Houston airport is plastered with photos of American Olympians, and 90% of them are women. In addition, the current Delta Sky Miles magazine has a photo on the cover of two female Olympians…you get the picture.
    Of course, nobody will watch these events. And if somebody does watch them, it will be men. The average woman will not spend ten minutes of her life to watch female handball, no matter how much virtue signaling the media engages in.
    What a waste. But then again, you knew that the media would use this opportunity to destroy the event with another tireless campaign of equalism.

    1. yea they show the ‘women athletes’ like they’re the best in the world. they’re amateurs compared to the men. Trying to make us think men don’t build everything in civilization.

  47. The ONLY reason why men would watch women play sport is to perv on the HOT women (if any) !! We love mud wrestling for a reason!

  48. Olympics are about National Bragging Rights. Something we as a group tend to endorse.
    Women’s Comp is basically saying our women are more athletic/better (and at one point, on a subconscious level, more fertile) than your women. Nothing wrong with that.
    Of course, I’d never subscribe to the idea that these women could hold a candle to the men in their respective competitions.

  49. Women will never be equal to men in most competitive sports, because men typically are stronger, faster, etc in the same sport. A male basketball player will be better than a female one.
    However, why shit on females who decide do something other than shovel fast food into their faces and stuff their fat asses into skinny jeans? At least these women are fit, watch what they eat, and have a passion for something other than endless Instagram posts of their latest manicures.
    And while you shit on these females athletes, have you wondered how you yourself would fair against any of these women? Do you swim, box, run, gavel throw, fence, competively? While these women would likely lose to men who compete in those sports, I bet those same women would would bury your ass in a competition.

    1. Because women should be raising children and maintaining the households for their men.

      1. Not all women want to do that Steve. And not all women should. There are women out there would would make terrible wives and mothers. My male cousin had the worst wife ever, he worked hard and was the primary bread winner and they had the so called traditional marriage but she would call him a loser to his face in front of their children if he couldn’t fix something in the house and had to hire a repairman. She really felt that her only role was to raise the kids and maintain the house, and he as the man was supposed to be the master of everything else and when he wasn’t she shit on him for it. She is an ex wife now. He finally decided to leave her when his eldest daughter called him a idiot because he couldn’t fix her Mac computer which had crashed. I think he realized that his wife’s attitude towards him was spreading towards his kids and I guess that was the final straw for him.

        1. All women can and should have husbands and children (barring those who are truly infertile). Those who are terrible at it choose to be that way. There’s ALWAYS a choice on how you want to act, and these days it can be hard for many to get past feminist programming. Women who say they want sporting achievement (or career, or any other kind) are just good at lying to themselves they actually believe it. The fact is, motherhood is part of a woman’s biology and is an unavoidable driver. Your example of a failed marriage doesn’t add anything to your argument. It’s just one example of a stuffed up relationship, not to mention that if she called her husband a loser, then it was never a traditional marriage in the first place. Women in professional sports have been fooled into believing that sporting achievement is an acceptable substitute for fulfilling their biological role, which is ironic when you consider that many are rendered temporarily infertile by the strain under which they place their bodies.

        2. If it’s so natural how come there were bad mothers and women who avoided marriage before feminism. What about natural selection? Perhaps nature doesn’t want some genes passed on so creates a minority of people (men and women) without a desire to procreate. That sounds more natural to me that the idea that every single person should be the same and live the same life. Besides, technology has allowed us to do loads of stuff not dictated by biology and that’s because the instinct to choose and be creative is part of what humans are. We’re not animals programmed only to feed and breed.

        1. Yup. This is a blog for men. We get our daily dose of how great women are every day.

  50. I recall every olympics, the Canadian women get more medals than men. This calls for people to say, “we should then focus and invest more on women since they have better odds of winning”. Funny, how Title IX style thinking only applies if men obtain more.
    I laugh as I think, “uh, the women are competing against, GASP, OTHER WOMEN!!!!”
    http://bit.ly/1U1xQSL

      1. Cheerleading. This is what (((triggered))) much of feminism in sports. Harridans complained that women were relegated to the sidelines as sex objects. Now networks are forced to give equal treatment to lower performing female athletes, even though the audience is much smaller. While female athletes enthusiastically submit themselves as cum dumpsters to the male athletes at the olympic village anyway.

        1. I’m pretty sure those cum dumpsters could beat you at any sport you sore beta

  51. “Men are thinking, writing, and creating, because women were pouring their energy into those men; women are not creating culture because they are occupied with love.”
    -Shulamith Firestone

  52. The best female athlete may only match up to or may marginally beat the average male athlete. Since we’re on the discussion of the olympics, let’s take a former Olympian athlete who is considered the #2 ranked female mma fighter – Ronda rousey. If you watch her training videos and highlights, you notice that her male trainers, coaches amd teammates are all either – former pros (aka washed up) or never good enough to go pro but had enough experience and knowledge to mentor and train. Being that is the case, Ronda who is at the top of her game in the female division can barely match up to her trainers.

    1. What is the point in comparing a female athlete directly to a male athlete? I seriously think the collective IQ around here is 45. That isn’t what “equality” is about in sports…

    2. yes women can’t reach the same physic as a man but I don’t know why your complaining you sound like an annoying bitch does rounda rousey owe you something. If you put yourself into acount I’m pretty sure rounda would murder you and again why are you comparing women with man if there two diffrent physics isn’t it obvious that there not going to match up at some point of there training

  53. Of course women aren’t as fast/strong etc. as the men. Duh! That’s why they have separate events. Many societies recognise the value of fitness in women, in ancient sparta (often held up as a successful masculine society) women were taught to hunt and fight and competed in their own games to hone a competitive spirit. This was because they knew fit feisty women could pass these characteristics on to the next generation and also serve as an effective last line of defense if their lands were invaded.
    If you don’t want to watch the women’s events then don’t but I don’t see how something that encourages you to be the best you can be (man or woman or disabled person) is a bad thing. I think we should all be pushed more in this direction not telling a short-arse or tubby girl “well you’re never going to be the fastest in the entire world so just stay on the couch and don’t bother”. A nation should be proud if it’s women or men prove exceptional in any field.

  54. Disagree. Separating women from men in sports is no different than separating men of different weight classes in boxing or wrestling. One of the comments said the Olympics was about being the BEST in the world, period. That’s true and not true, logical differences have to be accounted for. A 6’5 heavyweight boxer would likely kill a 5’7 welterweight. Being a woman is no different. People compete in defined classes or are naturally weeded out because they can’t keep up.

  55. In a contest between men and women, men win of course. None of these events should be coed. Many aren’t anyway. Women should compete against other women. Men against men. If a woman gets a medal for winning against other women (especially for gymnastics) fine. Better to encourage women to be involved in sports (not coed) keeps their minds and bodies occupied.

  56. You sound like a whiny bitch. How about feeling some actual pride for your country and the athletes it’s sending? No matter the gender, a medal for your country is an accomplishment and the training and disciples it takes to achieve the elite levels ALL these athletes have reached should be respected.

    1. For what you’ve written you should be respected to this artical is utter trash these women work there ass off so they can honor there country who gives a shit about there gender as long as there winning we should pride them

  57. Ug the fucking olympics again. What gets to me is the constant pandering towards women not so much women athletes. Men are better at sports, period. I very much detest the idea that since we have women participate equals “equality”…because if the olympics proves anything its that we are NOT equal at all. Even among the female games there is still a gold, silver, bronze and the rest – no equality there. Its not only ridiculous its flat out insulting. The vast majority of people in this world will never ever even remotely come close to competing in the olympics. If this is all about equality then anyone can and should play (and not compete for there can be no competition). That’s equality.

  58. This article is kind of pointless. Im as red pill as they come, but of course women should have separate events. The reason they do, is it’s a universal, innate knowledge, that everyone has and knows , that women are not as physically competent as men in strength and speed. That’s just a known real scientific fact.
    There’s nothing wrong with women having their own competitions against each other and having their gold/ silver/ bronze medals. This article is kind of like saying, “why do we have horse races if Cheetahs are a faster animal. If a horse wins a race, it’s just the fastest horse but not the fastest land animal so it doesn’t really count.” I realize horses and cheetahs are a different species of course and men and women are the same species, but the analogy still holds. I understand the point the author is making, but to say that this should extrapolate to the belief that women shouldn’t have their own competitions is kind of pointless and incorrect.

  59. You know I agree/disagree here. I do agree that women are physically weaker (et al) and that we’ve gone full SJW by not supporting men in the Olympic more because: reasons.
    Where I diverge is that we should be applauding women for attaining, and maintaining, their bodies at peak physical condition. I think it should also be stated, only for women who do so without chemical augmentation, e.g. steroids. Unlike their peers, these women are dedicated enough to be fit and trim examples of womanhood. No, they’ll never be the equal of men but they have avoided the trap of slovenly weight and appearance in most cases.
    Of course we can fall back onto the general consensus that the Olympic village is a fuck park, with so many hookups it isn’t funny, but that’s another battle. Put both men and women, in peak physical condition for their respective sex, and the “One Night Stand” screwing will commence.

  60. What I don’t see (and probably never will) is the feminists fighting to make NO gender Olympics a reality. They fight SOOOO hard in trying to convince everyone that women are just as good as men in everything, then why not fight to make ALL Olympic events ONE event that includes women AND men. Then we TRULY will have a champion that is THE BEST in the world! Not just the best in ‘men’s’ or ‘women’s’ events. If they are not wiling to do that then…STFU

    1. Do you really listen to feminist don’t you have something better to do than listen to there brain dead logic this artical proves that the average women’s physic can’t surpass the average man’s physic what point are you trying to make posting that on something that’s already proven

  61. Hahaha Hilarious paragraph about the fake chocolate medals!
    The whole concept of a strong woman is a paradox. A womans stength is in her femininity. Why waste your life trying to be a dude? Whether she is strong mentally, or ” strong ” physically, no men attracted to that. They are always miserable, prideful, lonely creatures.

    1. you sound like a bitch i would rather have an intelligent classy women than a brain dead whore which is certainly the only woman you ever get

  62. Does any other country on the planet give any fucks about what the exteriors of the atheletes they are sending to the Orgypics, er, “Olympics” looks like???

  63. What I find amazing is that in gymnastics there have been very few black women competitors in America. Yet now we have one and she is touted as the greatest female gymnast of all time. With the many thousands of white women competing in this sport over the decades in the US why was no white woman good enough to be called that? Yet another reason for the liberal white woman to hate the black woman

  64. 99% of men who read these sites and need advice on there game lmao are so sensitive if anyone challenges there masculinity they need to get facts from a website to show there superior yet they don’t take them selves into consideration sounds beta as fuck if you ask me.
    (Coming from a sincere man like myself these women are for a fact better than you at there sport don’t give me some fact you pulled out of your ass give me something you’ve done) -sincerly your logical thinking man

  65. Modern sports is all about cathegories: a welterweight champion can’t claim to be the stronger o better fighter, he’s just the best in the 140-147 pounds bracket. Bolt may be the fastest in the short run, he wouldn’t certainly be able too keep the pace for a mile with an skinny

  66. Modern
    sports are all about categories. A welterweight champion can’t claim to be the
    better or strongest fighter, he’s just the best in the 140-147 pounds bracket.
    Bolt may be the fastest in short distances, but for a mile or more he wouldn’t
    certainly be able to keep the pace with some skinny medal-winning east African.
    There are juvenile and senior tournaments, and of course female sports. They
    will always be slower and weaker than men, and as team sports (basketball,
    volleyball, soccer, etc.) regards women team’s matches are duller than those of
    men’s teams (with the exception of beach volleyball for reasons totally
    different to the superb strength or coordination of female players, as we all
    know). Even so, female sports have a lot of positive effects that shouldn’t be
    disregarded:
    -Keep women in good shape and teach them to eat healthy and take care of their
    bodies.
    -Female athletes learn to respect male wisdom and advice and to follow men’s lead. Male coachs are the majority in almost all disciplines. Also sporting women are the
    most aware of men being stronger and faster. I’ve yet to hear some female
    athlete claming for mixed tournaments, even Rhonda Rousey gracefully steps
    aside from the idea of going against a male MMA fighter. Another good example
    is howwomen’s 800m runners reluctantly accepted to compete against half-dude
    Caster Semenya, who easily outran them
    -For every female athlete that become an women’s rights advocate and/or gets
    attracted by feminist ideologies, there are many more that after a quiet
    retirement marry another former athlete and become dedicated housewife and
    mothers. Pretty sure women in sports despise fat chicks and won’t take any
    advice from them.

Comments are closed.