White Christian Couple Adopts Eight African Children At One Time

In a case of virtue signalling on steroids, an American Christian couple have adopted eight children from Sierra Leone in one go, adding to their existing biological family of two children. They made sure to broadcast their charity far and wide, even publishing a book, so that the entire world knows how superior they are to people who do not dedicate their lives to helping non-whites.

A couple have done an extreme ‘Brangelina’ by adopting eight siblings from an African orphanage in one go – the biggest single adoption in history.

Hayley and Mike Jones instantly increased the size of their family from two to ten by adopting the children from Sierra Leone.

The pair wanted a bigger family but were put off having children after both of Hayley’s pregnancies ended with emergency C-sections.

I would also be concerned for my wife’s health if she had two difficult births, but I would look to alternatives such as using a surrogate mother if I desired more children. The first thing on my mind would not be flying to Africa to adopt eight African children without considering how such an addition would affect my two existing children.

When the couple originally looked into adopting they were adamant it would just be one or two children.

But after hearing the names of a number of children who were still waiting to be adopted they decided they should take more.

They were then told about Michael, 16, Samuel, 15, Gabrielle, 12, Levi, 11, Malachi, nine, Judah, eight, Isaiah, seven and Zion, five, and decided they would be the perfect addition.

Mr Jones said: ‘We thought it was about two or three children we’d be adopting when we initially met the orphanage.

‘But God was telling us both separately to keep going for more and more – it was just brought up that there was a sibling group of six and eight.

Did God also tell them to run to the Daily Mail to share the tale? We’ll never know, but at risk of projecting my hyper-sexual worldview onto the couple, I can’t help but notice that the oldest “child” is more athletic, virile, and masculine than the husband.


Is it possible that his mother adopted an alpha male to compensate for her beta male husband? We’ve seen this before with Western European women who cuck their boyfriends by eagerly adopting masculine refugees into their homes.

Honey, I’m not happy. Let’s adopt an African refugee!

Sweetie, can Roosh Junior move into the bedroom with us? I want him to be comfortable.

Since the article mentioned that the wife had an interest in Africa, it’s safe to say that it was her idea to adopt. While we should all be thankful that the African children have a second-chance at life, and I hope they do thrive in America by attending prestigious Ivy League colleges, we can’t avoid the couple’s political intent, which Matthew 6 of the Bible specifically shames.

1 “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.

2 “So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 3 But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

Forum member Ocelot explains further

All telescopic philanthropy is virtue signalling: no exceptions. They could have adopted 8 American orphans of any ethnicity of their choosing, and used the resources saved on other charitable ventures.

There’s a reason they chose not to dedicate their resources to helping those closer to home. There’s also a reason they chose not to adopt some passably-white-looking kids orphaned by Islamic militants killing their parents in the middle-East.

It was important that the children both resembled them as little as possible, and were from an area firmly associated in most people’s minds with crushing poverty. Because the act is about them, not about the children. Hell, if you care about the kids so much, why not use your resources to pay someone in their own country to adopt and raise them instead of transplanting them into a foreign land.

It’s also a possibility that the intention is to groom these kids to be sent back to their home country as evangelists of whatever fake-ass McChurchian sect they belong to.

As the West continues to collapse, we may see no limit to how white Americans race to have themselves replaced by foreigners. It’s almost as if they longer want to exist.

Read Next: 6 Signs That A Man Is A Cuckold

33 thoughts on “White Christian Couple Adopts Eight African Children At One Time”

    1. LOL, you bet it is. Disqus bans any non-PC speech. However, with the proliferation of the red-pilled community, all this means is that Disqus will be used by a continually shrinking cohort, until it is finally marginalized to only the most die-hard SJWs. And then, hopefully, it will disappear entirely.

    2. All you prove when you attempt to cut a man’s tongue out is that you are afraid of what he might say.

  1. 7 boys and 1 girl? Why the disproportion? Let’s look at the African culture of polygamy and the precedent of the “Lost Boys” of Sudan. Polygamy is commonly practiced in Africa (and the Muslim world) and while it is PC to ignore this we have to consider how this affects marriage patterns. Do the math folks, a small percentage of men with money and power bogart most of the young females and you have a large number of wifeless young men. It’s traditional in polygamous cultures to expect boys and young men to leave their villages and “find their fortunes”, which is basically a way of reducing the gender ratio of males, leaving more young females for the men who want multiple wives.
    This was illustrated in the “Lost Boys” fiasco. Chaos in Sudan resulted in a disruption of village life, families disintegrated and children left homeless, the young girls were taken into other communities to serve as wives for older men but the boys were left adrift. Naïve diversity ideologues in the US swooped in and agitated to have those boys moved to the US. Thousands of young males, many not really children but actually adult men, were shipped over here while the young girls were left behind to be sex slaves. Nothing was ever spoken of the the girls which is typical of US liberal willful ignorance.
    It’s still going on, unwanted young males are still being cast out of villages or orphaned ones left dangling because they can’t serve as multiple wives. No doubt the orphanage these two diversity fanatics patronized had a long list of boys and young men to adopt but few females. The fact that this is a result of the cultural practice of polygamy never enters the consciousness of these dolts.
    That’s the future of immigration folks, the West absorbing vast numbers of young males who can’t find wives due to polygamous practices (or female infanticide), and we need to stop it. Now. Especially with the internet being available worldwide now, wifeless men all over the world get the message that the West is a source of females they can’t have I their home countries. Can’t let women be in charge of immigration policy, most of them will want to ship hordes of single young men into the US because of the social advantage of having more men competing for their sexual favors.

    1. Why the disproportion? Heh, it’s simple: the wife is hankering for a bit of black male action. She has the exact same look on her face as Roosh Junior’s German girlfriend.

    2. If they go after american black girls when they grow up, racial balance won’t be altered, but almost certainly that won’t happen, raised in a white christian good-doers enviroment they’ll chase naive white christian girls convinced that “God love us all the same”

  2. Cuck of the year. Look at the pissed of look on the white boy’s face. You know he’s counting the days when he gets to leave that n’ger nest.

    1. Or when he gets his hands on a gun and decides to ‘do something about it’.

  3. I’ve known white people who adopted black kids, and it never ends well. No matter what this white couple does, the black kids will resent them for being white and idolize their black biological parents. The white kids will resent their parents for raising them in a horrible environment.

    1. “No matter what this white couple does, the black kids will resent them for being white and idolize their black biological parents.”
      Or consider Kaepernick, who sides with the race of his sperm donor and craps all over his mother’s and adoptive parents’ race.
      Of course, his adoptive mom is a libtard, which doesn’t help either.

  4. Perhaps they just wanted to be good people in the end and saw a means with which to profit off of it via book? Nothing is particularly wrong about it unless said book DOES in fact reek of virtue signaling and sensationalism. I wouldn’t know about the latter because I’ve never read the book, and likely never will. I’m a bit too busy at the moment.
    I’m more worried about intent and application than the act itself. Adopting out of your race is just a fine as adopting inside of it. We are the same species, after all. Adopting out of your race, or adopting at all for that matter, for pure economic or status reasons is wrong but shouldn’t be halted as long as the children are properly cared for. At the end of the day, it still benefits the orphans taken in.
    On a side note, you’re missing a “no” after the last “want” in your article.

    1. And when all culture is destroyed for the sake of ‘consume, consume, consume’ what then?
      If I make a typo stating that 2+2=4, am I wrong?
      You suck at logic.

      1. Consumerism doesn’t “destroy” culture. Rather, it alters it. Culture as a concept can only be preserved by placing it into a petri dish and perpetuating the same conditions over and over again. Impossible to do in the real world.
        Hell, even if you were to scoop up people with a single ethnicity and ship them off to an island with all the requirements for self sufficiency, their culture would change dramatically from the start of the experiment to two hundred years later, even without outside interaction.
        You want to preserve a way of thinking? Teach it to your youngers, but it will mutate given time, nonetheless. This isn’t something that can be controlled without locking yourself and everyone else in your desired group in a cage.
        Also, I didn’t say anything about the article being wrong because of the typo… are you okay?

  5. ROFL ahahahahaha Roosh does it again. I don’t always agree with him but this is one brilliant Arab! I love the Blacks but I’ll be damned if my wife ever adopted one because I wasn’t masculine. This is why I lift weights, dress Alpha, shoot guns, drive a muscle car, eat steak, etc. I’m a hyper-masculine Hispanic Conservative so that may have something to do with it. LOL.

    1. Mexicans are rarely cucked. If ever. And certainly not be a Black guy. Mexicans just don’t take shit from their women.

  6. the wife must have boy penis fetish
    five cocks plus two small ones between each toes
    all seven used up by the hoe

  7. Wow. Just wow. This website and everyone on it is THE WORST. You all deserve to be publicly identified so people you know can call you out on your shit. You’re all coward “white victim” whiners. Quit blaming your shortcoming on other people, we’re in control of own lives. Your life sucks because you suck, and you’re miserable because you suck at life. NOT because women or people of other colors exist. You bunch are more full of excuses and complaints than other identity group, even those weird trannys. Shut the hell up and stop being totally shitty humans!

    1. Making an awful lot of assumptions about us.
      Of course, your programming tells you that everyone who does not believe the way you do must be destitute. Anything to detract from logically analyzing the situation.
      I mean, just look at yourself. We want young men to stop being tortured, murdered in the womb, having their families and cultures destroyed and being atomized, which our opponents do to turn everyone in slaves to corporatism, statism and consumerism. And we’re the ‘bad guys’? You’ve been deceived.
      Have fun helping the global elite make record profits at the expense of yourself and those you are supposed to protect.

  8. Whether or not you insert race into this or not, which race certainly is a factor in the “gutmenschen”, holier than thou attitude that played into this, I’m sure the two biological children are thrilled that mom now has 8 foreign kids to spend time with instead of them. Instead of looking forward to sharing time with their parents on camping trips, vacations, and making new memories with their blood family, they now have to compete and feel like foreigners in their own home. I wish some sane couple would adopt the bio kids and give them the life they deserve.

  9. Ok, First things first what happened to ROK’s comment section? Why is it not Disqus anymore?
    Secondly, I am also a christian raised in traditional christian household. I absolutely don’t understand why a white christian couple would adopt so many black people, mainly considering white birth rates are low and as such a reasonable white person should prioritize adopting white children.
    These people are the kind of (((christian))) who are still stuck in the cucked conservative civic nationalist mindset. It’s embarassing.

  10. i feel sorry for their two kids – i see this as another way for the open borders people to open our borders to unlimited immigration

Comments are closed.