In my earlier years as an upper-secondary school teacher, I made some valuable insights about female nature, socialisation of the coming generation, and intersexual dynamics. I also met some interesting individuals that I still have occasional contact with, at least through social media accounts (a former student is actually my current girlfriend).
One female, now in her mid-20s, in particular serves as an incarnation of the present penis envy and you-go-girl-ism syndrome which penetrate today’s western society. One may actually gain some insights from her decisions and inclinations, especially if those are reflections of broader and deeper aspects of society and culture and not just individual idiosyncracies.
Female narcissism and moderate talent as tools for dominating the androgynocracy
A typical point being underscored by writers in the manosphere is that women are becoming more masculine, and at the same time many men are becoming more feminine, leading to an androgynous society in which women mix female and male characteristics.
While a proper “Yang and Yin” balance might be important for both sexes, unfortunately these types of women tend to take some of the bad with them in the process. Instead of wanting a cock in their vagina, so to speak, they want a penis and a vagina so that they can screw the residues of the decaying patriarchy, while simultaneously being literally smashed by high-value men.
For instance, my previous student is obviously filled with ideas in her head of wanting to become “powerful”, leading to a career in the contemporary media landscape. In a Facebook post she even stressed that she was currently “building an empire”. Recently she also stated that she had moved to Londonistan in order to obtain more influence and enhance her career at a new company.
She is fairly tall, slim, pretty, brighter-than-average, socially competent, and has that sort of chiseled jawline that make her look a bit more like a man. All her major goals in life seemingly resemble those of an ambitious male, but like most other modern women with penis envy she ardently supports you-go-girl liberal feminism and #metoo.
This is the great paradox of Western feminism: wanting to acquire acceptance in a male-dominated world, but at the same time destroy its linchpins, in other words males and the power structures predominantly built and upheld by men.
But they do really just want to get a piece of the pie, some say, leading to a sort of balance or synthesis between traditionalism and feminism through which both sexes can prosper. Then why can almost no feminists except for Camille Paglia accept the irrefutable fact that men, both their bodies and brains, have created almost everything of far-reaching value in the world? Feminists, even the fit ones, do not want to share the cake with men but metaphorically devour it all themselves.
The downsides of penis envy
But being an economically successful female comes with a price. While a young woman gets her fair share of high-value cock, even celebrity dicks (yeah, she has hinted about that too on Facebook), it’s far from a guarantee that they will marry her when she is ready, while dwelling in the liminal time-space between youthful beauty and the ineluctable wall that day by day encroaches upon her hedonistic and narcissistic existence.
While people, according to the assortative mating principle, with similar incomes, looks and social status tend to marry, men care more about beauty and fertility than the size of her wallet.
For instance, currently one of the greatest ice hockey players, the Swede Erik Karlsson, got re-married with a hottie of moderate socioeconomic status (I sincerely hope that he has looked over the contract before signing it, though). It’s often fine that women have some money and work experience, but too much of those ingredients are completely secondary and even obstacles in the longer run.
Most guys would want to put their stick in her
Will most career girls like that become depressed and borderline crazy cat ladies? That depends on how obsessed about their careers they are, but very little indicate that they can become better wives and mothers than modest women, or that they are actually happy to work 50 hours a week or more. Quite the opposite.
If their earned money means something it’s mainly for their own fleeting pleasures, since many women are shopaholics and account for roughly 80% of all consumption. Wealthy men can buy their own goddamn cars, flats, and tropical trips, why a rich and successful lad rarely ponders about his wife’s incomes anyway.
As I see it, there’s very little good that stems from the penis envy phenomenon, at least on a societal scale. Men like us, mostly clustered somewhere in the great middle of the socioeconomic ladder, have a better shot at less career-obsessed and often cuter girls.
If one happens to run into such a creature anyway, she can always pay for the meals or drinks during the brief dating phase. So at least they do not parasitize on the economic system to the same extent as sugar daddy sluts and the ubiquitous lazy welfare trollop. However small, with every downside comes an upside, as the laws of nature constantly tell us.
And, of course, lastly a big good luck in Londonistan from us all here at ROK. It’s a vibrant place indeed.
Read More: Why Do We Push Women To Choose Career Over Family?
For the author…
Deuteronomy 5:6-21
“You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife; and you shall not desire your neighbor’s house, his field, his male servant, his female servant, his ox, his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor’s.”
A fine Christian sentiment, but if you observe it mindlessly, you may aspire to nothing in life. After all, Christians are too quick to embrace “love thy neighbor” at the expense of their country, kith and culture. And look how that’s turned out in Europe. Everything with a grain of salt.
@John…that is because it goes completely against evolution. Now, I am not one of those nutcase atheists who hates Christianity, actually the complete opposite. The problem is where did that neighbor get his land and his male servant? This also only works in a nation where there is still abundant land (as in affordable) to begin with. Lots of wishful thinking in the world, and a lot of people like to deny human nature (which only causes more problems down the road). Just look at the “muh individual” libertarians, they keep being all individual, they keep saying their land is there land…but when this country gets colonized by the brown and black people and they take power, what do you think will happen? Do you think they will respect land rights like we use to? Or, what happens when some A-hole inherits a bunch of property, destroys it to the point that it affect the land value for many generations after him, and even affect the property values of those around him? I like the bible and think many of its morals are responsible for the creation of western society, but looking at humans from an evolutionary perspective tends to correlate more closely with what actually happens in human society. People are animals who compete, steal, kill from one another in a drive to propagate the species, spread their genes, and increase their quality of life through the pursuit of resources and pussy. White man did it when they went out and colonized other countries, which rightfully so, since others tried doing the same to him. Land rights, freedoms, and other all that stuff is just a social construct that white man made with other white men to benefit their tribe (themselves included) and keep infighting low. Land rights are as much of an organizational tool to increase productivity in your country as it is a moral idea. People like to pretend that their land rights and freedoms come from God, therefore they are somehow immune to everything else, but that is a load of bullshit in actually reality.
Muh white man. hahah faggot
@ Wes
Again with the libertarian hate?
What happened, did Ron Paul run over your dog or something?
Yet again, Automatic slim coming in with another dumbass one liner that proves nothing. “Muh, why you hate me bro…Muh, my libertarianism…muh it perfect….Muh, how dare you criticize my libertarianism…me perfect…me super smart”.
You sound like one of those senile baby boomers, or maybe a old Gen-Xer…or maybe you are one of those pothead libertarians from younger generations. Which one is it?
@ Wes.
Yeah, Old Gen X-er.
But I am beholden to no one.
Good income.
Great FU fund.
All the cheap booze & upscale escorts I need to stay sane (sort of). And most of all, I still have “muh sense of humor”. I just want the Govt to leave me alone and let me keep the money I earn. Let the trash starve — not “muh problem”. What’s wrong with that?
@ Wes
BTW, feel free to hate me (or my beliefs/lifestyle) all you like. I have no problem with people exercising individual liberty and freedom of association (ha – LIBERTARIANISM!)
But really, I have no issues with hate. There are plenty of people/groups I have hated in the past and I fully expect them to hate me back. Even though I try to to be so hateful going forward.
Meant to say “not so hateful”.
Damn cheap Carlo Rossi wine…
Everyone on this thread, this is your stereotypical Libertarian, and this is what is wrong with our nation: “All the cheap booze & upscale escorts I need to stay sane (sort of). And most of all, I still have “muh sense of humor”. I just want the Govt to leave me alone and let me keep the money I earn.”
This guy just has no clue, and he literally thinks that government just gets in his way…pfff….that is the most childish shit I have ever heard. There is a reason governments exist in every society. “Keep the money I earn”…what money? Dollars? Pesos? Yauns? Every libertarian thinks they are a Spartan Warrior badass who lives on a magical island completely disconnect from society, and that society is just trying to invade their space and “take der money!!”. Do you really think that you would have even earned any income at all if not for all the previous taxes people paid to build our nation, defend it, and continually invest in its infrastructure, education, etc etc? Do you really think you would have any money or quality of life if it wasn’t for the selflessness and sacrifice of previous generations?
BTW, the government is never going to leave you alone, it will never disappear, and you will always have to pay taxes…..Oh, and just wait till the “others” take over and see where government goes from there.
@Wes
You are entertaining. I’ll give you that.
What is evolution anyway? I think it’s BS btw. The collapse of the West is due to political causes which have economical implications. When evolution goes the way you think it should it’s evolution, but when it doesn’t is it no longer evolution? Are you acting against evolution or is evolution acting against you? Who is to say that something is against evolution, it may be against your self-interest, but who can claim to know what evolution should lead to? It’s self contradictory, if anything, you should just stand back and watch while this evolution takes its course, how can evolution go wrong? Does evolution control people or do people control their evolution? Societal and technological progress clearly is outside of any evolutionary influence, China will be taking the reins of the economic and technological progress though they haven’t changed, certainly not over the last 30 years. They’ve been up and down over the millennia but haven’t perished. Is it because of evolution that they’re rising or were all their previous declines caused by evolution? I don’t see how it’s because of evolution to have common sense and to act in your own interest, you only need to think clearly and plan ahead, to understand the long term consequences, it’s not because of evolution that people do what will benefit them. Shouldn’t people have evolved not to act in a self destructive manner if evolution was real? When the Australian Aboriginals lost the ability to make fire was it evolution because they no longer needed it and could do without it, or did they thus devolve? Why didn’t they get smarter- is that not evolving? Is becoming dumber also evolution when you don’t need any brainpower in your environment? Is it in accordance with evolutionary principles that Mexicans are taking over the US, or against evolution while they’re turning the country into a shithole at the same time? Reproductive success has nothing to do with evolution if you ask me. Why do smart people have few offspring? Didn’t Darwin have fewer grandkids than kids? How could have the Eskimo evolved to have short noses to prevent frostbite? Where did the genes come from? Did they consciously decided to only mate with short nosed partners? Did the long nosed members of the tribe just leave for warmer climates? The long nosed ones couldn’t find partners? Why don’t the Scandinavians have short noses? To hell with all this evolution crap.
“People are animals who compete, steal, kill from one another in a drive to propagate the species, spread their genes, and increase their quality of life through the pursuit of resources and pussy”…
Precisely why the world is so effed up. Precisely what Jesus try to teach men how not to be.
Yes, we do have that ‘animal/lizard instinct’ but it’s our responsibility(burden) to repress it. To go be beyond other animals.
God gave us exceptional consciousnesses. He created us in his image. To be like God we have to transcend these instincts of lower animals.
Hypothetically, if “EVERYBODY” on Earth was like Jesus, would it not be a sort of a heaven. If EVERYBODY: the nations, states, tribes, individuals etc dropped their ego, pride, vanity, avarice…
If everybody was pure ‘Love'(whatever that means)
Why do all these nations spend billions of dollars on armaments?
Because their rationale is: shit, if I ain’t armed my neighbor that is, might try to steal all my shit. My women, house, field, servants, ox, donkey, end everything else. (Of course, translate this into modern context)
If you knew I was defenseless, would you do that to me/my tribe/nation and take all our resources to make yourself/tribe/nation richer?
Would you steal, kill, to increase your quality of life through the pursuit of resources? If you knew there were no ‘repercussions’ (punitive measures/law), for your actions, would you do this?
(Yes I know, these immigrants would do this)
Or the only reason you don’t steal from your “in-group” neighbor is because your afraid from your tribe’s condemnation and subsequent punishment?
Also don’t be so haughty and dismissive Bible. Bible speaks in metaphors/fables.
There are so many truths in it that are metaphorically conveyed.
Again I stress “metaphorically” because of course this ain’t exact science.
To me Christianity is not the institution of the “Church”(we all know the ridiculous evil shit they did) but the teaching of Jesus. The New Testament.
Christianity was a kind of social reform from previous Egyptian, Babylonian, Greek, Roman etc “religions”(as I like to call them: systems of governance)
Christianity was more fair and just to the individual and society as a whole. Would you rather live under Christian moral codes than those of the Pharaoh, Caesar, Primitive tribes etc? I’d prefer the former.
Invention of agriculture and animal husbandry are huge factor for development of civilization. There’s also another lesser known factor that gave birth to civilization: “The Leisure Class”.
Way way back then they owe their leisure to enslaving/conquering some other neighboring tribe.
Because, as you said it’s evolution. People are animals.
All empires from India to Rome were built on the back of the slaves.
The ‘governing class’ (I.e Pharaohs, Plato, Aristotle, Caesars, Abraham etc…) had all the domestic menial tasks like: cooking, cleaning farming, mining, manufacturing etc etc done by slaves.
That, freed the “Leisure Class” to devote their life to the finer things in life like:
art, philosophy, science, pondering the existence of universe etc.
They invented numbers, letters, codified language…
Do you think they would come up with this shit if they were preoccupied the whole day by the aforementioned “menial tasks”
Their great work, which immensely contributed to civilization was only possible by the industry of others.
Slaves greatly outnumbered the citizens of ancient Greece, Rome, Babylon, Egypt.
To some extent we too are pampered modern slaves. Much better treated.
All you gotta do is work 40 hours per week till about 65, and you can have a comfortable ‘material’ life.
But most folks that do this deep down in their souls are crying.
Also, don’t conflate religion with the concept GOD.
God is something unfathomable, something ineffable. Something way way beyond us.
And how the fuck does evolution disprove existence of God?
It disproves ‘literal interpretation’ of the Bible.
(Although Genesis was inline with evolutionary theory. In beginning God created plants/vegetation, fish, birds, mammals then mankind)
These modern secular, progressive, postmodern nations that shunned Christianity and traditionalism are having most problems with immigrants. It’s due to lack of Christianity/God why they embrace the invaders. Not because of it.
To answer your question, “was it Christian to…..” Yep, sure was. +
“Every knee shall bow, every tongue confess, that Jesus Christ is LORD”
You need to study real theology, not the pablum taught as theology.
Because Western Europe is such a hotbed of Christianity?
@Fitz…that is a logical fallacy, just like when libertarians say “if we just didn’t get off gold standard” EVERYTHING would be fine, or if we were all just “muh individuals” than EVERYTHING would be fine. The point is that if Christianity actually followed basic evolution (aka common sense) and didn’t look at humanity as some magical thing where God literally put an individuals name on a piece of land, and where God himself gives you special freedom “powers”, than Christianity would not be under attack, feminism would not exist, and people wouldn’t have left Christianity in the FIRST PLACE. What you are implying is that Christianity was perfect and all knowing and that people are only suffering now because they don’t follow it to a T.
Was it Christian of white man to wage war on Native Americans and conquer their land, put them into reservations? Was it Christian of men to burn people at the steak for being a witch? Should we still be able to have slaves like the bible implies? Do I hate humanity because I don’t want to see failed blacks from Africa recolonize my country? BTW, how much do you follow Christianity Fritz? How much time, money, and sacrifice have you given to charity?
It is common for ideologues to take advantage of bad situations and imply that “if only they did what I wanted them to do” than we would all be fine…it is pretty much the way cults start. BTW, isn’t it the Christians supporting all the “love thy immigrant”, “muh everyone is equal”, “muh sacrifice yourself for the pussy” type shit these days?
Whatever happened to Europe is a result of the communist mindset, not Christian values, some sly politicians do invoke Christianity to justify their shenanigans, but they themselves don’t believe in any of it. Religion is the last thing on a European’s mind when he goes to vote for someone who promises him a piece of the booty. Europe gave up on Christianity decades ago, France did in the 18th century. Communism (envy and theft), the plutocrat’s creed is what’s at the root of Europe’s problems. As Christianity goes, so does Europe.
No…. the whole love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek, respect women, and other shit is a product of Christianity. It has actually been fucking white man over the entire time. If white man had stayed more pagan in his beliefs than 90% of the world population would be white, lol. The most trad-con, pussy whipped, retarded people in these nations are usually hardcore Christians people who only want to see abortion get banned so that we can then have a flood of unplanned minority babies who will just end up fucking us over anyways. BTW, this idea that Christians of the past were these libertarian types is total garbage, back then if Christians didn’t like you than they were likely to form a mob and kill you, you know, like everyone else back then did. They were not these strong, morally just, hands-off type people you think they were. Those Christians still abided by the laws of evolution and mother nature, if they saw land another person was living on they would invade and colonize it, then repent and tell everyone else how God gave them this land and everyone should respect their right to own it….”MUH INDIVIDUALISM”.
Envy and theft are pretty natural bro, and it is pretty much what makes people work and strive for more. LOL, capitalism is an evolutionary system that based individual productivity on the desire (greed) to gain profit and wealth.
@Wes
When envy leads to theft leads to the collapse of a society, it’s been repeated throughout history over and over again, pagan Rome collapsed because of the out of control greed and corruption of its politicians, then people started to convert to Christianity en masse because they saw how their pagan gods must not care to allow their empire to go down the tubes, contrary to the Gibbon’s bullshit, but Rome had long been past the point of no return by then. Nothing lasts, it’s as simple as that, every pagan empire has collapsed. Human nature is to strive to better oneself to secure a better future, even on a deserted island you’ll fight to survive and have a secure life not to compete or out of jealousy, not to keep up with the Joneses. Envy will lead anybody and any society to a catastrophe. White countries that have a culture of theft and corruption like Ukraine, Russia and Belarus are one of the most dysfunctional places in the world- they’re white third world countries. The West is going the same way plus the immigrants.
Humans still operate based on an evolution, you cannot get away from it…the very structure that gives you “ownership” over something is the very structure that can take it away. Envy is not the problem, it is greed, selfishness, cowardice, and a lack of knowledge…mixed in of course with arrogance. If I envy something that someone has I can either work hard to get whatever it is for myself, or I can shoot them and steal it. So I wouldn’t consider envy a good or bad thing, it is just something you shouldn’t waste too much of your life on.
“Human nature is to strive to better oneself to secure a better future…” Ya, I thought that was every living organisms prerogative till I met liberals. However, “better ones self…secure a better future” is a very subjective word in this world that could imply anything. Did my white ancestors better themselves by coming to a land that white people essentially colonized at the expense of Native Americans? Sure. Did Adolf Hitler try to secure a better future for Germans by invading other nations, just like those nations had invaded others? Sure. Point is Humans will always fight each other, strive to acquire wealth and resources, etc etc. I assure you that if any nation was starving or desperately needed water than they would invade any other nation if they had to to get those resources. The only way advanced (first world) societies have ever formed is when a large enough TRIBE of people, who are homogeneous with the same cultural values, etc come together and declare a piece of land theirs as a tribe and then set about building a moral and legal structure that maximizes their tribe, and the individuals of that tribes “happiness”, or quality of life. Then you build a military to defend your borders from others who try to take it from you. If another tribe is more powerful than you and defeats your military, than the land is theirs, tough shit…then the process repeats.
I really feel blasphemous even making this observation, but it cannot be ignored since the argument trad-cons are making is that this is the final solution when it is just more of the same ‘accelerationism.’ Evangelicalism (cucked Christianity) and the Pope of pedophilia are pandering to diversity now and miscegenation full-stop. They want to fill the pews so they are turning to the lowest common denominator (nonwhites) rather than appealing to their white bedrock like they always have. So they have accepted this savage voodoo traditionalism superimposed upon this dying remnant of Christendom as some scheme to propel another Great Awakening into the Third World or inviting the Third World into the white world. They are playing less piety and more power of numbers. I think all good things come to an end, and perhaps it is time that these people either come clean with their intentions to cosign White Genocide as last gasp of survival in the future nonwhite monsoon or just ride their principles into heaven as they disappear from relevance. I am not talking about ‘individual salvation.’ I am talking about a collective stamp on society or the writ of conquest.
I’ll just add that there was absolutely zero evolutionary change in humans over the last 10 thousand years or so, since the last glacier receded which allowed all the many and great civilizations to appear and prosper (and decline no exceptions). No change in humans while every single one of their greatest cultures succeeded and then failed completely. Civilizational ascend has occurred repeatedly during what isn’t even a blink of the geological eye- I was always taught evolution takes millions of years. I might call it the change (evolution) of a political system but never an evolution of the human species. Historically, big, expensive and corrupt government has always eaten its host economy away, all the while humans haven’t changed a bit.
yes darius groups can evolve towards stupidity and that is evolution when somebody says one group s stupider because they are “less evolved” that is that person not understanding evolution. In terms of short noses I am not sure. Chinas rise is not by evolution its because they can copy the west and that globalism means their creativity gap doesn’t hinder them so much because they can copy things.
No the US is being ruined because whites built white society and many other races just pull it apart as they have different genetic lifestyles and they destroy the order and cannot contribute much. Natural selection these days is towards the stupid and you can see that.
Wes’ premise was that the collapse of the Western world is because they act against evolution. Are they or is evolution and natural selection acting against them? He conflates evolution with societal and technological progress. If anything- evolution doesn’t care, it’s just a theory of nature taking it’s course if you will. I don’t see any evolution anywhere though, if the environment changes those who cannot survive or won’t leave just die off, they don’t evolve, they adapt and react, blacks in Africa haven’t changed neither did whites in Europe for as far back as we can go. In archeology, when the modern man is first encountered there is no evolutionary change afterwards, if Europe becomes mulatto in say 300 years, that new human won’t be an evolved white, that’s just gene infusion, if your genes don’t change you don’t change, when people choose their mates and some desired physical or character features become more pronounced that’s not evolution to me, and people strongly prefer their own kind, change is resisted. From what I know IQ and physical appearance don’t strongly correlate statistically, if a population becomes dumber you won’t see them looking different when naked, maybe they’ll just be wearing stupid clothes. There were various humanoids alive at some point, they even coexisted, there is no fossil record despite the greatest efforts of anthropologists to prove that the white man has evolved from them or from a common ancestor. The way the world is created it’s not a surprise that everything that’s alive is built from the same chemical substances and that portions of the DNA are shared, it had to be to live in the same shared environment, no surprise there, a wrought steel cannon did not evolve from a wrought steel truss though they’re chemically identical. Can’t run a UNIX program in a Windows environment. The universe looks created to me.
it may look created but all of organised regions such as the hundreds of books claiming to be the authoritative word of god and prophets in every generation all look created by humans to me.
Most religious accept micro-evolution even the hardest christian accepts that if he is educated ie that one group can out breed another. The thing if a population is split by say a barrier like an ocean over milllions of years they get more and more different until eventually they cannot interbreed. Even with Dogs you can see evolution and how it works where humans just selected the best at task A for so many generations and eventually they evolved that way. Now great danes and micro dogs cannot realistically interbreed so even with them you can see that they are on the path towards being different species.
dariusz you are not stupid. Really read about it rather than reject it without really looking. The problem that humans have is that millions of generations is hard to really see or understand as we think that 100 years is a long period rather than it being a flash.
You also get more evolution i periods when a tiny group survives and say they might all be those with characteristic x or something.
Judeo-Christian sentiment, as Deuteronomy is in the Old Testament, the Jewish Bible.
With female penis envy being the defining thread in the current female herdthink, we approach a blurring between between what is defined as an empowered woman and what you would patently call LESBIAN. It comes out that bossy empowered and cougar type wives are often closet lesbians who retain a ‘husband’ as a beard. A perfect example is Hillary Clinton.
GAVIN MCINNESS and AJ discuss this angle on Hillary. Especially bookmark where Mcinness describes how dominant lesbians are really just ‘playing house’ @ 7:10 – – – pure gold . . . .
“Badasses” do not cry victim. Ever…
Amen. I definitely need to remember that line for when the next time a feminist crosses my path, bragging about her strength and yet claiming victimhood at the same time.
Nice article. This guys nails it.
However, once again maonsgherians are over-valuing scrawny, titless, assess (mildly) tattooed broads. The pop culture already pumps them up and they naturally have attitude to begin with, then manospehrsians come along and compete for who can get the girl that looks most like Kate Moss: all with “zero fun given”, of course. Lastly, let’s give it up with this “high value men” nonsense. “High value men” obviously are those best at mimicking pop cultural trends (gangsta rappers, singers, “badboys”) and are utterly useless and insufferable. So now we have useful guys trying to mimic them to get laid, but of course, not really caring if they get laid (riiiiiiight). Guys, I know you all know this, let’s stop pretending and feeding into this system before we ruin what’s left of useful guys huh?
60-year-old grandmothers from India are charging premium escort prices in Toronto. That’s how bad it is when a city is infested with militant campus feminism and Gay Prides!
lol that is not true
Did you even see the BackPage ad that the MGTOW posted?
Not true, but it is amusing:)
Stay away from the gynocentric and feminist parts of Toronto and you wouldn’t have to resort to knocking your rocks off to pensioners. You will find very hot Montreal hoes at Minx Spa who might only cost you the door fee plus a $120 tip to her for half hour of fun!!!
http://minxspa.ca/profile/Emily/205
Nice ass
They can charge whatever they like, but are guys paying them? Are there that many “mommy freaks” in Toronto?
what makes you think that “high value men” are all mimics of other social and economic figureheads?You smear men who are actually out of mainstream non fad following individuals or self employed or self made successes and refuse to play the ridiculous rigged societal game with that ridiculous assertion. taken for the generalization that it is, it may be 75 percent more or less true. goddamn, there is men, mgtows mostly that have a damn thing to do with what you identified as mimicry models. fuck them and that shit. i emulate mostly what my father and my grandparents instilled in us as kids (some later proofed to be unsuitable for the current mercenary cut throat society we live in now), none of that conforms at all to your assertions, having been forced to adapt morality and values to the current brutal anti male realities of today. i respectfully disagree.
Toronto is soooo bad that 60-year-old grandmothers are charging premium pricing for quickies!
http://toronto.backpage.ca/FemaleEscorts/60-60-60-specials-open-minded-sweet-horny-indian-grandma/90036807
60$ for sex is not that expensive.
If anything Toronto is a good place if you want to be a john because there is so much supply relative to demand.
There’s a glowing red escort service “massage” sign at nearly every corner to be honest.
@ Clark Kent: are you a Saudi prince? $60 for a quickie is equal to $180hh and $360hr to fuck a grandma to boot! Toronto is still a bad place!!!!!!!
Why overpay to fuck a pensioner twat when you have a variety of hoes, natural and enhanced to fuck for $150hh?
http://premierspas.com/
Ever since that Slutwalk event at York University, those “Massage” parlors are popping up all over the Keele campus area that several “plazas” are actually “massage” parlors in disguise! York University must be very feminist if “massage” parlors are popping up like weeds around campus and even nearby the Residence Hall at Keele and Steeles!
Many of the “massage” parlors are popular with Americans like myself who make use of your Poloz peso to get more “bang” with my Green paper!
Asian female immigrants are great. We could talk for a long time about the terrible issues and problems brought by African and Arab migrants. Indians do little shops selling exclusively grossly unhealthy and generally carcinogenic products of minimal to nill social value. What do Asian women do when they arrive? Start giving sexual favors and massages for cheap to white guys. Gold star immigrants.
@ Ellon, but those Oriental twats would have to “live” at the massage parlor, because if they attend feminist universities in Toronto, they will adopt the Canadian bitch attitudes and Toronto cancer.
Imagine if there was a single Asian massage parlor in America that was actually limited to massages. I think just operating any Asian massage parlor should be considered beyond reasonable doubt for pimping based on what I have enjoyed.
No Bro because they don’t absorb the feminism as they see this as Western white trash philosophy. They are more logical and don’t get conned by the culture meme about random culture separating the races. They have their own red-pilled Asian viewpoints. When I first came aware and proud to be white it was after screwing this Chinese woman who afterwards told me about her dreams of marrying a white man and how great we were and honest gentlemen big huge cocks ect. She red-pilled me about various minority groups over time. They are very harsh in their language to describe some racial groups. I remember the term “trash” being used to describe several groups. She made me proud of my race as well as red-pilling me.
The big myth is that alt-right dudes seek Asian chicks. Thats wrong. These chicks red-pill white dudes on the daily about minorities and make them racially aware as well as instilling a racial pride in them. I have seen this with my friends as well. I am not the only one. Asian women are the alt-rights biggest allies.
@Ellon…watch out, those Asian women only do that, and only favor white men, because for the time being they view white men as strong, wealthy, and powerful. When this country gets a lot less white, with more Asians and others coming in (especially Asian men with money) than you can kiss a lot of that shit goodbye. Many of these guys who go to Thailand are essentially just using the wealth created by previous white generations (the value of the dollar) to essentially buy servitude and respect….when that auroral surrounding white man is gone, you can kiss that lifestyle goodbye. BTW, Asian women are fucking crazy, insanely Jealous and superficial people, and are massive whores…they also vote like 99% leftist and socialist…so keep bringing them in white boy, because soon they’ll be taking your money without giving you the massage (if you get what I mean).
@Ellon, you are right about Asians just saying whatever the fuck…it is actually pretty funny. The way they say it is all nonchalant, and of course they are a minority so no one can blame them.
What the fuck did I just watch? Pass me some eye bleach! The Joo has corrupted even the oldest of women!!!!
I reported that ad for spite lol
The most important thing to a man is his sense of worth. Perhaps that would be all right, were it not for the fact that his sense of worth is connected to his penis.
The most important thing to a woman is security; and that would be all right too, were it not for the fact that her security usually depends on glorifying the general’s privates.
Something terrible happens when our entire lives revolve around cultivating and celebrating our sensual being. This misdirected focus of attention brings out the dark side of our natures and leads to just the opposite of what we seek— feelings of unworthiness and insecurity.
Penis envy leads to lesbianism.
I think this is becoming a serious problem in the West, especially with younger girls. Most young girls I know, under 22, seem to have no problems with being with another girl even though they don’t think of themselves as a lesbian or even bisexual. They just seem to have this attitude of whatever tickles their fancy at the moment is ok. A lot of these girls mess around with their BFF while they are seeing guys. But I think this is creating additional problems for men. They are building relationships with girls and getting emotional support from them are just using guys for sex now and then and for public image. The real relationships are with the girls.
It means girls now have a whole another group of people to choose from – women. And it’s really difficult to compete with a woman. I am seeing a girl who is messing around with one of her friends while she is also seeing guys. She doesn’t think of herself as lesbian or anything else. For that matter younger girls seem to not want to label themselves at all. But in my experience these girls usually have a stronger sexual attraction to girls than guys. Sure they like guys and don’t mind having threesomes but they like girls more. One curious thing I have noticed is that the more masculine ones are attracted to really alpha guys. When you are very forceful with them it turns them on sexually but it doesn’t mean they prefer hanging out with you. A lot of these girls are also good looking. So they attract both girls and guys. All in all I don’t think this is good thing for men – just limits the number of available women.
This is what happens when we allow corporations to mess up with our hormones
What is wrong with ladies having lady friends? Mine turned out to be my wife, but this does not always hold true.
F*** outta here you carpet munching piece of sh*t! Gays and lesbians are going to be sent to the hellfire when Jesus returns to clean up this NWO agenda that is taking over the West.
Troll?
That’s because most women honestly just find men to be a pain in the ass. So now that women aren’t forced to be with men for financially, a lot of women would rather have a girlfriend that understands them in the most basic level rather then deal with a guy- who she’ll end up having a million disagreements with due to differing perspectives. I know a lot of women like this. Women are also very emotional, and the majority of guys just can’t get you like your bestie can.
Yeah, I think that’s true in part. Even females and males that are largely compatible will end up having all sorts of disagreements and grudges, especially if both have different but strong wills on a number of different topics. Largely it’s linked to men being more rational and aloof and women being more emotional and focusing on trivial matters. That’s also why so many guys hate feminism, because they are not allowed to be themselves in a natural way. They have to micro manage their speech and behavior in all sorts of way, at least to a significant extent.
There are ways to move beyond that, especially if the girl is a bit dependent on the guy’s apartment and so on and they look at the bigger picture instead of fighting about minor problems, but it’s annoying as hell sometimes and will cost you time and energy.
For instance, my girl becomes mad at me if I watch a movie that includes naked women, even though she is very attractive herself, according to most people’s standards. So when she realized that I had finished watching “Hostel” (that she disliked and we stopped watching after 20 minutes because of all the tits and asses that are included, which I should have known about and therefore never suggested in the first place) she became mad and saw it as a betrayal. I am not joking.
I have stressed that I have seen numerous naked women, both in real life and digitally so it’s not really a big deal and I don’t really care about that so much (even though one always notices pretty women), but she thinks that digital breasts and vaginas are as bad as real ones. She also thinks that it’s “unfair” that guys get to see tits but girls never any dicks (in most films), which is kind of a weird position since she’s not a feminist.
I have also tried to explain to her that if I really were interested in just watching naked women, and more, then I would go directly to porn instead of watching movies with momentarily soft porn content. This lead her to the conclusion that I am in fact watching porn but deletes those web pages from the browser history; hence that she distrusts me even more in that regard.
We have solved this but oh my fucking goodness what a waste of time/energy. If you have a slutty girlfriend she will not bother about being overly jealous, but on the other hand she will likely be unfaithful. If you have a semi-traditional and overly jealous type, on the other hand, then she will be upset about minor issues and find other ways to try to micro manage your existence.
I don’t know if this is more like an individual/personality thing, in part, but the broader pattern is in any case that girls are crazy/neurotic/annoying in some way or another. So even if you have been “lucky” and found a predominantly good creature she unhesitatingly will still create drama in some form.
Why do lesbians have crazily high divorce rates? Two bitches. Women have this nature which clashes badly with other women and you have two both partners with the higher expectations of a relationship and with a proness to walking out then it rarely works.
Gays I am not supportive of but they have lower divorce rates and actually seem to get some sort of agreements on fidelity and cruising and their divorce rates are about the same or lower than heterosexual relationships when you control for religiosity.
There are many debates and there is a lot of shock in the Lesbian world about the extreme divorce rates of lesbians.They always prejudicially assumed that men were the issue and therefore that two women would work far better together when its the exact opposite. I dare say that when more data is released across the globe the issue will be shown to be specific to white women.
Men often take the role of “rock” in a relationship where their calmness allows a woman to be the woman in the relationship. Women are indecisive and always need their own way along with all the gossiping and the emotional stuff. Lesbian divorces are also very often hideous affairs with two vicious attack dogs slurring the other. Google lesbian divorce rates to see the data.
Women evolved to have committed relationships with male providers and so much evidence suggests that commitment to an extent is genetic. Extended female sexuality is where she gets men to mate her during infertile periods of her cycle which is seen with animals with relationships and that is the point of it to keep a man when you cannot get pregnant. The ying and the yang fit as complements by design.
Lesbian divorce cases with two women fighting are like the divorce cases from Hell. There is no cooperation when lesbians divorce and both go for the jugular trying to manipulate the case against the other in increasingly bitter ways.
Men also form deeper bonds with their partner than women do as a woman by her nature is better rewarded by leaving a failed tribal leader ( the king is dead long live the King ). A mans feelings he can develop for a woman, if he believes that paternity is his, have evolved so that he then bonds with and helps the child. Men mate guard and such to be assured of paternity by their core nature and thus they evolve a stronger affection for a good woman than a woman does for a man. That is common knowledge in the red-pill. Women aren’t as suited by emotional loyalty so when you put two such creatures together it is like the phenomenon of magnetic repulsion.
The left view high lesbian divorce rates by way of them being “too fast to commit” . In the red-pilled we don’t accept that convenient leftist without-evidence paltitude but look to evolution and to the natural order. A random order and especially one invented without regard to its viability will logically likely have far more errors than an order perfected over many generations of natural selection even if they are not immediately obvious. That pragmatic understanding is a core understanding of the right not just here.
True criticisms and analysis of lesbian relationships and why they don’t work and why women should at least know this before choosing to have one are banned in the MSM. That is why ROK as one of the worlds few dissenting media outlets is vital as it allows criticism where the MSM blocks and bans all criticism of its holy cows such as the promotion of homossexual lifestyles.
Lesbifriends have high rates of domestic violence too.
These women had no good male role models(fathers) growing up so they are lost. That’s all it is.
Guess what, most men find that most woman are “pains in the ass” too.
The difference is a straight man won’t arse root, another man for lack of finding an available woman. Only weak, pathetic people do that because they can’t find a better option. So many woman at uni went gay, because they were ugly and couldn’t attract a man. I even had several of them proposition me for sex. They didn’t give me a boner either so I declined.
Tbh, that is how male and female relationships have always been and should be, and are starting to become again (#MeToo, Times up, rape hoaxes etc). Man and woman are only supposed to join together for sex/procreation, not fraternization, coworkers or becoming friends and picking up each other’s traits. There was a reason that gym class was sexually segregated (and racially segregated) back in the 1970s. That is where the ‘you can’t see the bride/groom on the day of the wedding until you are walking down the aisle’ came from. You were literally supposed to consummate your love immediately after because she still had her hymen and that permanently contoured her pussy to your dick, just moments after you made an ‘honest’ woman out of her, which is impossible now because no women are ‘honest’ before marriage and certainly are not salvable.
You should not seek to ‘marry your best friend.’ Your lover is not your best friend or even your friend at all. I have heard about guys being put in the friend-zone by their wives. How fucked up is that? Women are NOT your equal in any way, shape or form. They are not your ‘partner’ or your ‘copilot.’ They are your subordinate. They do not look like us, act like us or even think like us. So stop looking at them like they do. They are animals. Their entire value to society and worldview is based on their vagina being moist.
Men are the logical thinkers and leaders. Women have all of their eggs in one basket for a reason, while men have a diversified portfolio, with limitless utility.
The bride’s father used to give the groom a dowry as an INCENTIVE to take his daughter off his hands because men were more valuable. The woman pursued the man…and they STILL do…it’s called hypergamy and monkey-branching.
I always cringe at that old “honest woman” platitude. In reality, the only honest women are prostitutes.
True, but I’ve lived on a street littered with hookers…and they just revolting. So their ‘honesty’ is lost on how unsavory they are. Look at my thumbs down lol. These guys can’t handle the red pill.
@ Clark Kent: I’m not shaming you if you think that fucking grannyies for $60 quickies is okay, but I just checked on the latest in massage parlors in Toronto, and I’m sticking with this French-Canadian hottie. I only have to pay $40 for the hh door fee, and she charges her fee when I meet her:
http://minxspa.ca/profile/GABRIELA%20/220
It will come up lower than fucking an Indian-Canadian grannie for $60 quickies!
I just googled it right now. Check this link… http://toronto.backpage.ca/FemaleEscorts/60-hot-spanish-gorgeous-avialable-now-hot-60/31522210
You can hook up with an early 20s latina for a half-hour for 60$.
If you want cheaper than that, you’re going to have to move to Thailand or Africa or something.
Stop looking for the old Indian women!
I heard Tripoli is nice this time of year (sarc)
You visit her first. She doesn’t say if she’s indie or not, or if Tyrone will be watching her and taking her earnings after we’re done. Or it could be a cop trying to entrap a John to appease Chanty Binx. When you’re done fucking her give us the green light for $60 quickie Latina pussy.
lol are you one of those guys who checks for reviews every time you leave the house?
Lots of Tyrones and Ralphs use Backpage to rob men and use police stings for feminists…Terb and Pink forums are your acquaintance.
You hate “Jaws”???
I love that movie.
The owner of the spa is a J3w. Good luck with that!
Why the hell do you have the e as a “3”? The J.e.w. is more clearer for Abe Fox.man to be scared of us when Germany will rise again!
As always, the juu is behind the xxx trade in (((Toronto))).
Millennial Woes argues that men need confidence, but that women don’t really need it AT ALL to live successfully as women according to their natural function.
You take masculine advice from a gay guy?
Not the ***ing moderation filter again! These f***ing conniving J3ws need to meet Hi7ler in person!
Nice troll brah. Your rabbi would be proud. L’chaim!
Penis envy is out of control among women ? just drag them in gangbangs. problem solved.
“a former student is actually my current girlfriend”
Nice!
Way to go William!
Thanks. Yeah, I am pretty pleased. I taught a mixed group of people, 20 years of age or more, for six months, in so-called municipal adult education. Some of the students came from other countries as immigrants (for example Romania and Albania) and had to study several subjects/courses in order to acquire a complete Swedish upper-secondary school degree. That was how we first met. She had lived in the country before so she was fluent in Swedish anyway so it was a perfect mix between Western/Swedish and traditional/foreign in the way she had/has her cultural identity.
I have also met three former upper-secondary school students after they have graduated. Those were born in 1993, 1994, and 1995, so I am rouhgly 10 years older. I was very professional so I would not do anything unethical within the frames of my profession, but after graduation I think it’s completely okay to kiss or sleep with women who are 20-23 at that point. I am a fit and well-dressed guy with decent confidence and social skills, so it’s not so hard to attract a couple of former students with better-than-average looks.
I was, however, close to screw up with a girl who was completely in love with me. I wanted to bang her but she asked me for to come and visit her friends (my former students) at a club and I didn’t want to be in a picture with them, so I asked the girl to just come to my apartment but she was hesitant. I also said something about that I had met an Asian girl in the same club that they were in so she became a bit sad instead of “impressed”. Quite counterproductive behavior of me, but at least I wasn’t photographed with them. The girl was still a bit secretely in love with me, even though she had a new younger boyfriend, but when I stated that I was in a serious LTR on FB maybe 1-2 years later she stopped following me and realized that it was it and that we were never going to be together or meet again.
“…men care more about beauty and fertility than the size of her wallet.”
Absolutely.
Any man that cares about a females “wallet” is unmanly.
But then, I am very old fashioned that way, and also, very used to paying for females…
Yeh a lot of women have this weird idea of thinking what they want in a man is what a man wants In a woman.
Men would rather fuck and settle a cute slim uneducated janitor than some ‘accomplished’ corporate slave with a bitchy smug attitude.
Yep. A young, pretty, petite high school dropout who works at Walmart and knows how to do laundry. I’d be happy with that.
“Then why can almost no feminists except for Camille Paglia accept the irrefutable fact that men, both their bodies and brains, have created almost everything of far-reaching value in the world? ”
One can change that a bit and come up with the overall question of the day – “Then why can almost no non-whites or feminists except for Camille Paglia accept the irrefutable fact that white men, both their bodies and brains, have created almost everything of far-reaching value in the world? “
Jesus fucking christ never heard of Erik Karlsson until now but that guy has some horrible fucking taste in women.
Just google “Erik Karlsson wife”. His ex Theresa is a 6 on a good day and his current wife looks like a glowless, over-the-hill, wonky-eyed IG #blessed porta potty.
Not only is Erik a famous, top-performing multi-millionaire athlete, he’s also damn good-looking. This guy shouldn’t even be pumping & dumping such genetic pleb trash, let alone WIFING IT UP. WTF is wrong with him? He should marry a modest 10/10 HBB and send a clear message to all the basic sloots out there that THIS IS THE NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS.
Instead, he’s creating a severely distorted view of the sexual market and will be the direct cause of the creation of at least a few thousand — if not a few hundred thousand — barren, bitter cat ladies who spent their average 5-6/10 prime waiting for a guy like Erik.
Sure, looks is partly a subjective thing but most men would consider his current wife to be very pretty (although too plastic for some). She has a nice body, long hair, long legs, maybe fake boobs of reasonable size and shape, and attractive facial features. As I see it, he has merely traded up a bit: from an adolescent girlfriend (a 6 as you say), to a 8.5 gold digger who is good to show for the cameras and will keep him happy in bed for 15 years or so.
Why should they have penis envy
when vagina-envy is much more
justified considering the entire
planet revolves around vajayjay
You know your insecure as hell when you have to pose flipping the bird in a photo.
The comment section is full of your typical virtual bad asses who do a lot of preaching with zero practice involved. I came here because I’m sick of homo-saturated places like the Huffington Post and the rest of the ultra liberal media outlets, and only to be confronted with a bunch of whinny ass beta and omega males who claim they are oh–so-alpha males. TFOH! There’s even some dolt praising Asian Uncle Tom women for their red-pill ideology. WhyTF do you want an Asian woman who’s trying to be white when you can just get a white woman whose proud of her heritage? Tells me a lot about that beta white guy who’s suddenly become “so proud to be white”! An Alpha Male does not settle (especially on some pie-face pretender), he goes out and gets WTF he’s after.
Beta and Omega males go for those Asian types because they can’t get the hot white tricks and that’s only because now a days there’s too much competition coming from the ghetto side of the tracks (and too many white women are black sex curious). No big deal if you are a ‘real white man’. I’m not on some NAZI racist BS, I’m just stating facts that can be unearthed with a quick Google search. So sphincter-aggravated omega and beta white males have to settle for sell-out Chinese chicks who want to clean up their Asian gene pool (with blond hair and non-pan faces)? A Chinese/Japanese/Korean/All-Nese woman is a surrogate substitute for a real white woman, so a white man that has no choice but to get himself an Asian woman is only half a white man (I’m asking a question)?
If all you’re going to do is whine and talk, don’t call yourself an alpha male because a Man’s Man is too busy doing something to be talking about what the [email protected]$ he’s supposed to be doing.
Oh yeah. A feminist is just a lesbian in denial!!!
Women are 100 % jelous of white alpha males. They are jelous of the power they have, and the freedoms they inherited by being male. They dont fight for equality they for superiority. They arent satisfied with there position as a women, and instead of trying to be better then other sexy women who are femine, and stand for true femality nature they instead try to better men who are literally out of there leuqe. These kind of women are a disgrace to real women who honor there devine position as a FEMALE. There is something wrong with you big tine if your sexualy attracted to the same sex and its a big red flag