The free fall continues. Pedophile Todd Nickerson just published a new article and video with support of Salon this month. In the piece, video of a young girl in a pink dress plays while Nickerson rationalizes his lust for children, and describes “relieving himself” of his sexual lust in the bathroom after spending time with her.
The march towards total sexual degeneracy continues at a rapid pace in Anglo America. Even as heterosexuals (and especially heterosexual men) are just getting used to their new second-class status as a result of the ongoing Marxist revolution, social engineers are already at work destroying the last vestiges of morality and sexual restraint in the culture. In a display of just how duplicitous the American legal system is, even though there are laws against prostitution in every state some states do not have laws against sex with animals, and now leftist media is pushing for legal acceptance of pedophilia. As George Carlin said about prostitution: Selling is legal, fucking is legal. Why isn’t selling fucking legal? Why should it be illegal to sell something you can give away?
Beyond the comedy and contradictions of the American legal system and the marginalization of heterosexuals, sometime soon it is reasonable to expect people who do not support pedophilia will be called bigots, cave dwellers, and other colorful labels the left invents, because to leftists sex with children (and later sex with animals) is just another lifestyle choice.
Enter Todd Nickerson
The leftist Salon magazine has been at the forefront of pushing the pedophilia agenda. In fact, Todd Nickerson has become their unofficial poster boy, as they attempt to knock down the remaining columns that hold up what’s left of Western Civilization. Twice within the last year they have given Nickerson the podium, letting him push his blog called Virtuous Pedophiles. It’s a strategy that uses Saul Alinsky’s 10th Rule for Radicals: If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive. Nickerson plays the victim card, just as homosexuals did for a generation before gay marriage was legalized:
My purpose is to go out and educate people, allowing people like myself to come out and be open. Society makes it harder by persecuting us because a lot of us become fatalistic. We start to think it doesn’t matter what we do or say they’re going to hate us anyway.
In addition to marginalizing those who do not want to live in a society where pedophilia is the norm as “ignorant” people who need to be “educated,” Salon pushes the victim narrative, reporting that poor Nickerson had to pack up and leave town after he “came out” to his family so he wouldn’t offend anyone. (Offend is, of course, an insidious leftist code word.) Nickerson says he learned he was a pedophile at age 18 when he babysat a 5-year old girl that he “fell in love with” but did not act on his urges.
Salon ran another Nickerson piece in September 2015 entitled “I’m a pedophile, not a monster.” In the bloviating screed, Salon lets him label pedophilia as an alternate sexual behavior. Nickerson did receive at least some support after posting the article:
Maybe he’s right. Maybe pedophilia is, at least for some people, an intractable in-born trait that it is possible to have without supporting or endorsing. I think we should all at least have the humility to entertain the possibility he knows his own experience better than we do.
There’s nothing about being able to sympathize with someone who possesses a terrible trait that they didn’t choose for themselves that precludes us from also taking every necessary step to protect kids. I know this much is true: historically, acting out of a sense of moral panic (whether that was communists, witches or drugs) has pretty much always made us less safe because it removes our ability to think.
Next up will be crackpot psychologists defending pedophilia as an alternative lifestyle choice (already happening in legacy media publications like the Los Angeles Times as we will see, but becoming more widespread in the future), before the media take up the issue, turning it into another circus, and legislators once again bend their knee as a lobby for pedophilia organizes.
“Hell is empty and all the devils are here.” -Shakespeare
Destroying Morality
This latest attack is another in a long line aimed at demoralizing the population. There is no doubt the normalization of all sexual urges will reduce human beings to a pre-civilization level of existence, i.e. return man to a sexual jungle. Legalizing pedophilia and bestiality will be the capstones of the Marxist revolution that is ongoing right now across the Western world. Once America and Europe have been broken, the rest of the world will fall into line like dominoes.
Feminism was only the first chapter in the move against humanity. Even though anthropologists knew a century ago that lifting restrictions on monogamy and female sexual freedom would cause society to collapse, their warnings were not heeded either because of foolishness, ignorance, or on purpose. Sex and Culture, published in 1934 by J.D. Unwin, was considered “a work of the highest importance” by Aldous Huxley, whose warnings about where America was going were also not heeded. Huxley wrote:
Unwin’s conclusions, which are based upon an enormous wealth of carefully sifted evidence, may be summed up as follows. All human societies are in one or another of four cultural conditions: zoistic, manistic, deistic, rationalistic. Of these societies the zoistic displays the least amount of mental and social energy, the rationalistic the most. Investigation shows that the societies exhibiting the least amount of energy are those where pre-nuptial continence is not imposed and where the opportunities for sexual indulgence after marriage are greatest. The cultural condition of a society rises in exact proportion as it imposes pre-nuptial and post-nuptial restraints upon sexual opportunity.
In Unwin’s study of 80 tribes and 6 civilizations, these startling findings were published:
The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs.
The sexual market is the grandfather of all the other markets of man. Once a society becomes liberal with sexual behavior, it loses its cohesion, impetus, and purpose. The abandonment of any sexual restraint puts America on the road to becoming a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah with a low level of social and mental energy. In other words, it puts us on the road to Idiocracy.
Those who do not support sex with children are bigots, according to the media and Nickerson
“You Are a Bigot”
Because of the genius with which the left is enacting these de-civilizing policies and bringing them into the media for mainstream discussion, it is likely they will soon begin marginalizing resisters. As with so many other cultural norms that have been razed in the West, anyone who resists will be labeled a bigot. The puppet masters have realized enormous success using this playbook. Look how far they have already pushed Western culture. Gayness is lionized by the media because, after all, someone can’t help that they’re gay. Transsexuals can’t help they were a woman born in a man’s body and want to use a bathroom that is the opposite of their anatomy. And, coming soon, pedophiles can’t help that they’re attracted to children.
Barack Obama has already said he thinks sex education in kindergarten is “the right thing to do.” In addition, he threatened to cut off school lunch funding for poor children at schools that did not provide third gender bathrooms to children in a thinly veiled effort at sexualizing children. The Los Angeles Times jumped on board with the pedophilia narrative, placing pedophilia on the same level as heterosexuality as it reported the sob story of pedophile Paul Cristiano who told reporters he prefers pre-pubescent girls.
Many researchers taking a different view of pedophilia: Pedophilia once was thought to stem from psychological influences early in life. Now, many experts view it as a deep-rooted predisposition that does not change. “These people felt they could snuff out the desire, or shame me into denying it existed,” he said. “But it’s as intrinsic as the next person’s heterosexuality.”
Western civilization is already on a slippery slope as it slides towards mainstreaming pedophilia. Leftists have already set a precedent unseen in world history with the enshrinement of homosexual marriage into law. As The New American put it, there is no historical precedent in the world for the acceptance of faux marriage yet America accepted it. There is, however a lengthy history of pedophilia across the world:
Yet if I say that our current cultural trajectory — a bizarre trek that has caused us to boldly go where no American had gone before — has as a point on its arc the acceptance of pedophilia, I’m sure I’ll hear “never, ever under the stars and stripes!” This is a normal human reaction. But the past is a picture of futures man inevitably will paint again, and history hollers its warnings for those with ears to hear.
There is indeed a history of pedophilia in humans, but as Unwin pointed out it was seen only when a society was declining. One must think about this critically: with a retrograde push for men to be able to have sex with children, the marginalization of heterosexuality, and pushing androgyny of the men and women, what is the end goal of this insanity?
Once the full agenda of sexual degeneracy and moral relativism is realized, considering the lack of resistance Americans have put up so far to the agendas designed to break civilization, we will have arrived in a dystopia where everything is normal and nothing can be judged. Moral relativism, which tells us we can’t judge the behavior of others, even if they are child molesters is ultimately a deal with the devil. The 1960s mantra “If it feels good do it!” has become the theme on our road to hell.
The marginalization of heterosexuality continues with a newly invented term “stare rape”
Change Tactics
Traditionalists and conservatives tend to put up symbolic opposition to changes like these, before eventually caving in and kowtowing to the demands of the “oppressed.” This is the wrong tactic when fighting in war, whether it be a cultural war or a literal one. By setting the tone of the discussion in advance, liberals are ensuring conservatives play defense. Ancient Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu, master tactician and author of The Art of War would not approve. From Chapter 6, Weak Points and Strong:
Whoever is first in the field and awaits the coming of the enemy, will be fresh for the fight; whoever is second in the field and has to hasten to battle will arrive exhausted.
In addition to the colossal error of letting the left set the conditions of the narrative, other tactics must be changed. Each time a leftist agenda item is shoved in their faces, the left imposes their will on the right rather than the other way around. Sun Tzu continues:
Therefore the clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy’s will to be imposed on him.
Since many conservatives are already reeling from 50 years or more of losses in the Culture War, they’re lost and most have no idea where the next attack will come from (like the pedophilia agenda):
Appear at points which the enemy must hasten to defend; march swiftly to places where you are not expected.
The left also plays the victim card and uses what Bertrand Russell called The Fallacy of the Superior Virtue of the Oppressed as a shield, while they strike with their sword of moral relativism.
You can ensure the safety of your defense if you only hold positions that cannot be attacked.
Conservatives consistently play defense rather than putting the left in a defensive crouch.
Hence that general is skillful in attack whose opponent does not know what to defend; and he is skillful in defense whose opponent does not know what to attack.
These short passages illustrate only a few of the ways the culture war will be lost and pedophilia will be imposed on the population if those against degeneracy do not change tactics. The re-education of the public to accept any sexual behavior, while criminalizing heterosexuality in every way possible (i.e. there is a new push against stare rape) is an attempt at reducing humans to the equivalent of easily manipulated farm animals, who, echoing the battery metaphor in The Matrix, only exist to create profit for their masters on the Anglo-American (and eventually world) tax farm. H.L. Mencken wrote about the true aims of those in power:
The aim…is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States, whatever the pretensions of politicians, pedagogues and other such mountebanks, and that is its aim everywhere else.
Will the push to normalize pedophilia be the breaking point in the Culture War, and a turning point before the stroke of midnight? Or will Americans once again march to the orders of the left when this issue soon enters the Overton Window?
Read More: We Are Only Three Small Steps Away from Legalized Pedophilia
The pedophilia rot may run way all the way up to the top. Someone on Reddit lays out how pedophilia and Satanic rituals is embedded within Western governments itself:
It’s a long read, but very informative. The left is controlled by the globalist elite and the globalist elite may be running pedophile rings, so it makes sense that leftist outlets will now push pedophilia acceptance. It can merely be to make socially acceptable what the elites are already doing.
If you take the research in the link to be true (it’s well-cited), our world is totally controlled and poisoned by pedophiles.
This may well be the case as Corey Feldman and Elijah Wood have both come out about the rampant pedophilia in Hollywood. The big difference as to why it works for the elite and not the masses is the sexual market dictates men must lead. When you have women running the racket on school, employment, and men playing the trickle down effect of job attainment, sexual dominance, and social status, you have a group of women who by and large hold no loyalties to creating a future generation. This is only exacerbated by women natural nature to follow and whatever nonsense comes up, if emotion can be added to it, will be used to lead the masses. Free the women and anarchy can be reached.
Anarchy for us is a population with an inability to reproduce, and an oligarchy of government choosing that can readily keep the boot on our necks while promoting whatever sways women. Women don’t think, they feel. And this natural maxim will be when women start to apply reason, when all of society are in nursing homes which they can’t afford to be in because they no longer have any family willing to support them. And whatever children they do have will say fuck them, YOLO.
Its how the elites are able to control politicians, movie execs, ect.. If you follow the script you get a stable, step out of line and your arrested as a pedo.
Also it should be no surprise then that sodomy is on the rise as pedophilia creates gay people out of children.
Dennis Hastart was only the most recently revealed case, and doing something I believe most of them are. Just look at Lindsay Graham and tell me with a straight face he’s not doing sick sexual stuff.
I have personal experience of visiting my own state legislature with a retired state senator who was in office for many years that I later became friends with. He is somewhat of a legend; indeed he is still so well known that when we entered the room during a live press conference, the presenters interrupted their speech and gave him a standing ovation. We walked through the halls and everyone would stop what they were doing and come out and shake his hand.
Afterwards we went to lunch with a sleazy, greasy lobbyist who was also a former state senator, and a couple of other guys. They just walked out after eating, and no one paid. Of course the cops were never called, these guys just do whatever they want. The waitress was confused, but not angry.
There was a rumor of the state attorney general having a boyfriend, and I asked my friend about it. His response, “Oh yeah, they all do.” What do you mean ?!? I said? “Most of these guys down here have boyfriends or at least mistresses.”
Fast forward to last month a buddy of mine met with the current state senator, a female, who was complaining to him about the hypocrisy of all the men down there. When asked to elaborate she said “Oh, they all vote against pot but smoke it all the time, all vote against gay marriage but have boyfriends”.
This stuff is insidious. I don’t have any proof other than my friend’s word and circumstantial evidence, but it’s clear to me that government is a corrupt child sex ring. I have no reason to believe Washington would be any different. If anything, it’s probably worse.
They’re like the untouchables.
Except that they’re touching kids.
If we cut off their hands they won’t be touching either kids or their keyboards to act as clicktivists for their terror campaigns. Problem solved!
I believe in the after life where all will be judged by god. So, lets just kill the pedos and put them in front of the only one capable of judging them. If you go in for reincarnation lets just help them onto the next cycle of the wheel.
I got a new business partner who’s gay, and let’s you know it. A week or so ago we were driving near a school, and he made a joke about coaxing the 5-8 year olds over for a blow jop. I drove a couple of blocks and told him to get out of the car. I haven’t heard from him in two weeks. We’ve got projects going on, but I guess I lost a partner. Good riddance. I’ll take care of the business myself like I’ve always done.
But yeah, they think whatever they want at that moment is all that counts and nobody can say anything to them.
Most of their boyfriends are what they dub ‘Speechwriters.’ Not coincidentally, they’ll usually share the suite with their patron.
When I was a teenager in Washington DC older guys used to try and groom me. Fortunately I saw their game for what it was and stayed far away.
They tried that shit with me when I was in DC as a very young man. I was confused at first but then figured it out right quick. DC is packed with closeted gays.
Packed. Lol.
This may sound funny, but being in a youth gang provides some protection against predatory elites doing that. It flips the battle. I think city youth gangs need ministered to with red pill, anti elite debauchery preaching.
It was actually quite sinister. These guys would pose as grandfatherly types or big brothers, promising to “help you out”.
Yeah, Turd Packed.
With so many rotten to core people in high power positions it’s no wonder society is a mess. How did this come about?
I’ve often heard suggestions that ‘alternative sexualities’ or any thing that might be labelled deviant is encouraged as a way to keep politicians etc in line ie step out of line and your dirty little secrets will suddenly come to light. You can be trusted to the extent you can be ruined.
It’s not proven though but it wouldn’t surprise me
Nobody’s brazen enough to assassinate them yet. If/when that starts I think you’ll see a lot more sensible, logical shifts in their reasoning out of sheer terror.
It’s just a Cohencidence.
Did Jew see what he did there? ^
Two words: Edgar Hoover
Two words: Karl Rove
Two words: Anthony Weiner
Two words: Larry Craig
Two words:
Y’know what, forget it — they’re all deviants.
The problem with Democracy is that the people who are put in power are a result of a tight nepotistic network.
Here is how it works :
1 ). You come to a rich people’s club, you are introduced to them, since you were pre-selected by someone from within.
2 ). You do some disgusting stuff in private on camera so they have what to blackmail you with
3 ). The worse things you do the higher your position in the Dem or GOP party. So you are more controllable. As seen with Hastert
Needless to say, this does not happen as much with fascism, monarchy or direct democracy. Which while flawed is times better than mass democracy.
Democracy is the lowest common denominator for the masses and top down control by the moneyed elite.
So many useful idiots too.
The Jew rules in the democracy, because the opinions of the masses are shaped by the press. He has the ethnic organisation and the unimaginable arrogance to think his people the chosen race, worthy of such a role, and also of the subjugation of other races, particularly the noble White race which he detests. It is therefore in his interests that the majority can ‘have their say’, and the stupider the masses are, the better (which is why Jews always push for suffrage to be extended to as many unthinking idiots as possible).
From his power in the press and in lobby groups designed to harass those who challenge his fanatically pursued interests, the Jew controls the mass mind (and therefore ensures that the puppets who come ‘into power’ can do so only after bowing before his idols). But the press can also be used to poison the morality of society, and to push individualism, which is always trumped by Jewry as an organisation.
Paedophilia is just another step on the Jew’s Cultural Marxist ladder. It is designed to tear civilisation apart, because the Jews know they can only rule a society torn apart from within. While the White race is divided amongst itself, and its racial foundation increasingly undermined by promoted miscegenation, Jews can only continue to profit.
I don’t know about on camera or anything like that, but they own your ass with money and more importantly real “freedom”.
Ponder this…most have to work on a schedule, answer to multiple bosses etc, and get a couple of weeks off a year.
But once your on the inside you come and go as you please, moderate responsibility, do whatever you want even durring work hours. You get your shit serviced by the system first, and paid a nice salary. All you have to do is toe the line.
Who is going to toss that in the can for a counter agenda.
Monarchy is an even more limited nepotistic rich-people club that involves both money and a bloodline. You can still get lucky and join the rich people club, but you can’t become a prince by creating a runaway iPhone app.
Our democracy can be fixed the same way a monarchy can be; when the king becomes a bad king you stick a pitchfork in his entire family and set the castle on fire.
Some men with funny wigs guaranteed every citizen the right to own a firearm for a reason. Hell, they even wrote that reason down.
Pedo pusher Judith Levine with her New DoubleSpeak “groundbreaking” book:
Harmful To Minors: The Perils Of Protecting Children From Sex
https://www.amazon.ca/Harmful-To-Minors-Protecting-Children/dp/0816640068
“Ezra Levant explains in shocking detail the kinds of crimes Ben Levin was convicted of on March 3, 2015.
The court heard about the former Deputy Miinister of Education in Ontario — a “teacher of teachers” — incest fantasies involving his granddaughters, and his disturbing collection of writings and photos.
Calling it a “grooming manifesto,” Levant warns that Levin’s fingerprints are all over the province’s new sex-ed curriculum, one which sexualizes children at far too early an age.”
TAKE ACTION! Ontario’s sex-ed curriculum sexualizes young children, undermines parental authority and imposes the government’s morality on every Ontario family.
http://www.ezralevant.com/ben-levin-convicted-child-pornographer-had-a-hand-in-sex-ed-curriculum/
Attempting to normalize pedophilia:
http://www.cbc.ca/firsthand/features/four-misconceptions-about-pedophiles
If a man wants to truly be free, he must be willing to stand against all, to protest all, to give up all, to walk away from all. Like Thoreau, he must be willing to lose all freedom to truly gain it within himself.
Ultimately the true man of Freedom is in fact the only true man. This is perhaps the reason I am so against, and will rail against any form of socialism, which, unfortunately is argued for by some on this site, to my dismay.
Those who will give away their freedom for trinkets will come to the end of their lives broken to the extent they compromised with their values. I know I myself have a long way as I have compromised far too many times.Alas, it is a hard road to true freedom.
Good point, Representative Democracy is a scam.
you must have a very weak mind if the jews are controlling it
Totally. In Indiana, a guy joined a country club at $20,000/yr. (Mortgaged his house to do it.) Then met some people, gave $20,000 to the Mayor’s campaign, got a $3.5 million dollar city contract (When he had NO company to do the work; They fronted him the money and it took him three years to build the company and hire the people) And now he’s big player in politics. For the price of a used car, and with some name-dropping you can get instant wealth.
Check out a book written about the 1956 U.S. census. After WWII the Jews came over here and took control of the media, banking, and entertainment industries. The census used to say what industry you worked in, the Jews took it to the courts, flat out saying that they didn’t want the American people to know how much influence they got in those areas in such a short span of time. And also admitted that the Holocaust was a result of the German people’s anger at the Jews for controlling the same industries before the war. They’ve been fighting for world domination since the 1600’s. The U.S. and Hitler were a gift to them that’s enabled them to get a stranglehold on world thinking.
That’s what the Red Pill is about. Never lose sight of that. As men regaining our masculinity, we need to be aware of when we’re being manipulated and make sure we’re acting out of true thinking.
Been reading about the Pelopenesian wars in ancient Greece. Yeah, you nailed it. Democracy always ended up with and oligarchy running the show and starting wars to protect their profits. And it’s always the un-monied people paying the price. The only time Democracy works is when there’s a strong middle-class. But then it always devolves into chaos because the rich always end up controlling things.
“regaining our masculinity”…….hmmm…mine, and a whole grip of my honorable christian buddies have never lost it, and for the record, jews are not your problem, your un-justified paranoia might be…….
This Ben Levin story is eye opening. Here is a guy who was the key architect in Ontario’s education curriculum and he has been proven to be a pedophile. And yet, little is mentioned of this fact in the media, in the government, etc..
It’s another Woody Allen.
You must be quite the White Knight if you feel the need to engage in censorship. .
Did you hug any fatties today?
white knight? censorship? fatties? what sort of galactical signals are you receiving, mr hugo? i never mentioned any of that……..however, i do find your fear of jews laughable, for what it’s worth
Fear??? Yes. I am so fearful of a group that has accomplished little.
What else you got? I’m an uneducated redneck? I live in my mother’s basement? C’mon girl give it your best.
nope….i’m done…….i have work to do…….and you, sir, clearly have too much time on your hands
You go girl!!
Paul Ryan just has to be one of those perverts too. I mean, just look at him. Along with the fact that he’s a whore for Wall Street.
I know Speaker Ryan personally. Paul’s being gay would sure be news to Janna Ryan, a woman so attractive that if I were gay, she could get me to switch sides!
Now, Paul *does* have the kid of physique I had at his age, and everyone who met me just assumed that any geek that V-shaped must be gay.
And yes, guys, sorry, but that is the body type women want to wrap their legs around, not yours!
Sure you do. FO back to National Review Glen.
1) Janna Ryan’s mouth and chin are too big for her face. What we call a “manjaw”. She’s a 6 at best.
2) He could be bi. A lot of these pervy elites are.
3) Male physiques don’t mean nearly as much to women as female physiques do to men. (Or male physiques to gay men, for that matter.) Unless the women are testosterone-poisoned.
4) A manjaw on a woman is an indicator of testosterone poisoning.
Janna’s first job on Capitol Hill was as a receptionist for then Rep. Bill Brewster (R, OK-02). Bill reminisced with me once, long after Janna married Paul that, “Foot traffic in my office doubled when Janna was at the front desk.”
Have you ever seen either of them up-close-and-personal? Personal enough to, say, have a couple of Janna’s business suits in your closet that you keep meaning to ship to her in Janesville? (Purely innocent, worse luck…)
Who is Glen?
And why *wouldn’t* I know Speaker Ryan? Recall how everyone talks about what “They” are doing in Washington. *Someone* has to be one of “They”…
Uhhh… “Corvinus”…
Have you ever in your life had a physique such that at a pool party the patrons of a “Big Six” ballet company mistook you for one of the company’s male dancers (though unusually muscular in your upper body) rather than a fellow patron?
I did not think so.
If you had, you would not write about how women don’t value them…
I am a software geek, but I once dated a “Big Six” ballerina and was her rehearsal partner for roles too hard for her professional partner to execute the pas-de-deux if neither of them had danced it before. Ballerinas are *heavy*, and, *en pointe* they are very tall.
Pee Wee Ryan, He doesn’t seem gay to me, just a cuckserve… Which never seems masculine. Don’t be surprised to hear that he was doing something other than just watching the movie in the dark…
Along with the Neo-Cons control of the party, the gays became more powerful. Of course Ryan is queer. When George Bush Sr. was in the White House a scandal came out that they were having queer male prostitutes all over the White House at night.
I think the question is not the women being attracted to him. Many gays develop great physiques, but then go after other guys. Ryan is as queer as they come.
Seriously, Joe, what *evidence* do you have for Speaker Ryan being “queer”? Just because he has a hotter body than you do?
Male same-sex attraction is only 1%-2% of the entire male population, so aren’t the raw odds against it?
JOE:
And you know that Speaker Ryan is queer exactly how? I was roommates with Paul on the Hill from 2000 to 2007. Yourself?
Kinda like I get the sense that YOU are.
Corvinus: at one point some years ago I had residences in seven U.S. cities, and in four of them I had a woman who was beautiful for a *living* (e.g. First Cast female lead in a Broadway musical). Just curious: do you too routinely share homes and beds with “10”s?
The main group forming tight-knit conspiracies is homosexuals, not pedos.
Homos seek out other homos, creating a network, pedos seek out kids and usually see other pedos as competitors or security risks, so there is little cohesion among pedos. The exceptions are quite rare, and on closer examination many such rings are actually homos, such as in the Catholic Church, where the victims were almost all post-pubescent. Surprisingly, most child sex abuse is not by “fixated” or near-exclusive pedophiles but by those who have polymorphous perversions and low inhibitions who opportunistically screw whomever happens to be around.
True, pedo blackmail material is the hardest there is, and so may be encouraged by puppet masters among the relatively few public figures they want to control, but for that very reason they aren’t going to support anything that reduces the value of that blackmail material, let alone legalization, and certainly pedos are not going to get together and lobby the way the homos did when the risks are so much higher.
The next frontier in degeneracy is going to be plural marriage, which has a growing and cohesive constituency among Moslems. It doesn’t have the anything like the stigma of pedophilia, it’s traditional in many parts of the world and nobody gets terribly worked up about it.
Lowering the age of consent is a goal of much of the left, but not of women, particularly older women who don’t want to have to compete against 14 to 17 year-old girls. With the purely self-interested opposition of more than half the political base of the left, it isn’t likely to happen from direct action. Possibly the ending of age of consent may be implemented by court decisions saying that it is a violation of equal protection of the law that some under the legal age are more competent than some above it, yet the latter have rights denied to the former, nevertheless the opposition of blackmailers and women will likely win out.
Homosexuals and pedophiles are very close. Most pedophiles are gay. The founder of the gay rights movement was a pedophile. NAMBLA was once part the LGBT and in secrecy certain members still are. But because openly advocating for child rape and molestation didnt give a good image and the world just wasnt ready for it they placed ot to the sidelines only in secret they continue the practices. Pretty sure big chunk of support on gay marriage alone came from pedophiles
Do homos need to conspire? I thought they were out in the open (no pun intended). The pedo conspiracies are actually more dangerous and sinister in my opinion. They are entrenched in government, the Church and entertainment.
If things keep falling apart in 2nd/3rd world countries, the age of consent will be forgotten because you will have a flood of older teen/young 20 something women looking to escape the Venezuelas, Guatemalas, Syrias of the world. They will be happy to please the men of America, Canada and Europe. THAT’s what will have older women peeved!
There’s definitely a gay mafia. Spy agencies routinely recruit gays, and then they move up and branch out. Fuck, our political system in Indiana is run by gays. Either you have the closeted gay Republicans in fake marriages, or the Democrats are out in the open. But you can’t get anywhere in politics in Indiana unless you’re gay and/or in the Masons. Those are the two recruiting places.
Lindsey Graham is not totally utterly and completely prison-bitch gay. How dare you imply that. Lindsey Graham is a manly man’s man.
Okay, you win. I couldn’t say that with a straight face.
Graham can’t say anything with a straight face. (ba-DUM)
Im sick and tired of everyone bashing Lindsay Graham!
Just kidding
The problem with most politicians is the power. Most have become corrupted because they believe they are above the law (but you and I have to follow it).
It will be the downfall of this country because none of them work for the people any longer. Hell yes, Washington is the worst because it’s on the national stage versus the state (bigger stage, bigger divas…both men and women).
Man, Graham is a total fag. It’s so obvious. And it shows how much the party is in trouble in that they’ve actually had him speaking around the country.
Uh, just finished reading the rest of your post. In our state, most of the Republicans are gay. They have sham marriages to women, but everyone knows that you have to be queer to get anywhere in the party. They vote all kinds of laws against their own people, but that’s just queers for you: They take advantage of any situation they can, even if they have to hurt other queers.
Have a listen to this…. Edward Heath…. and other Tories…..
I still wonder if the Ted Heath allegations are misdirection. Here you have a barrister making allegations about a dead guy, who was always rumoured to be gay, and absolutely bizarre suggestions that it was German intelligence murdering children who’d Ted Heath abused. None of it can be proved, and nothing has really come of the Jersey investigations where this is all supposed to have taken place. I have no doubt real child abuse occurred, but this guy – the barrister – sounds like an intelligence shill designed to take the heat OFF the real perpetrators
Elija Wood (Frodo) has recently spoken about hollyweird’s pedophile circles.
Your article on the topic was right.
And Mike Cernovich pointed out the pedophilia in the “religious right” GOP. I’m starting to think it’s some kind of power thing, like prison rape.
Absolutely abhorrent.
Be very wary of the ones who obsessively attack homosexuality.
This^. No matter how many times people like Woody Allen or Bill Clinton or Jeffrey Epstein get caught with their hands in the cookie jar, rubbing our noses in their criminal depravity while we absolve them, being an elite allows access to all the sexual depravity they could want carte Blanche. They could literally get a new underage child later today in their respective fields and no one will bat an eye internally. The only people even speaking out on it are those who feel they didn’t receive enough money.
And to your actual point yes, and yes. Look to Disney and all the little girls who they churned through versus their career trajectories and how many were caught in some sexual act or other. Almost none of the Disney boys even have careers after 19. Go figure.
It’s also a different kind of control.
Ever been involved in GOP politics? I have.
Ever wonder why some real grass roots fellow, like a farmer who has had enough, or a businessman, just gets snubbed by the GOP and all the support goes to some creepy lawyer from some law firm somewhere?
Not only does the GOP seek “perverts” and I use that term loosely. You see a baby-raper is the pinnacle: that’s the one that goes higher. But lower down, there’s all kind of deviance they are after but it’s not the deviance alone they are after.
What they are after is that sort of sick individual who is not only sucking dick in the basement, but takes a podium and rails against cocksuckers. Someone who is not only gambling at some backwater casino, but also like to take a podium and rail against gambling. Somebody who not only fucks underage girls at brothels, but then takes delight in taking a podium and talking about “family values”.
That’s the kind the GOP wants. That’s the kind they can control. But it’s not entirely coercion: they want more than just the cocksucker/pervert/gambler/addict. They want that overall mental illness of someone who does those things and then takes a sick delight in acting like he’s against it. Then they lavish that representative with PAC money and junket flights, while reminding him that all this luxury and money is gone if he gets outed.
And this is why the GOP is essentially the “bend over” party. This is why they grabbed their ankles as Obama acted like a king, but if Trump is elected, you will see them all of a sudden start saying things like “The president can’t act unilaterally!”.
There will be plenty of room for republicans to swing alongside democrats.
I hope you are right. Trump has certainly done a lot of elbow rubbing with and hugging of the Clintons and other political elites to suddenly be their worst enemy. If he turns out to be the right wing Obama, another false idol, things are worse than even I imagine. Trump and Bill along with several Neocons have frequently been seen on the golf course having a great time together. There’s just something I don’t trust about a knight in shining armor arriving just in the nick of time to “save us.”
What did Woody Allen do? His ex Mia Farrow (Sinatra alpha widow and general Cluster B nutcase) accused him of that pedo shit during a really acrimonious divorce. If you mean his current wife, he never adopted her and she was a legal adult when they started banging. Woody is one of us, look at the chicks he’s bed and his body of work.
The trouble the GOP has with Trump is that while Trump may be many things, and oft negative per the “rules” of conservatism, if he’s at least not a pervert it means they cannot control him.
Ultimately you will see that when you have leftists proclaiming that “whites will be a minority!” and how America is going to change when all those illegals and immigrants get voting power, it’s a big fat “duh!” when the guy who says let’s build a wall is the most popular.
My own personal hope is that everybody despises democracy and realizes it for the step backwards that it always was.
Deviant sexual fetishes on a person is a good way to control them as well as drug abusing types. Blackmail and withholding what they desire is ways to control them
I’m voting for Trump. I had no idea my party sucked so fucking bad.
I watched a creepy movie last year, and it had this huge, extremely powerful pedo ring at the center of it. It stared Ryan Reynolds and the movie was pretty shit, but it made me think about the potential of such social structures and their scope of power. Made me glad I grew up in a poor, politically irrelevant place, because I was a ridiculously cute kid.
Your comment though, just makes my blood boil and my skin crawl with disgust. At least the left is somewhat open with its degenerate practices and positions. The “conservatives” you speak of, it does make sense, but god damn. We’ve got a lot of fighting left to do.
Remember that Kurt Russell started out as a Disney boy star.
It’s how you can tell they all belong to that same sick group (both Rs and Ds). Their policies are all the same and they place people in power that they can control (because most of them are sick perverts or other). With Clinton, is was all of the affairs (thank goodness with women) but you get the point.
Today, it’s even worse then we all thought.
Damn right…and there is the rub.
They can’t control Trump and it’s why the established are running scared (on both sides). They all know that gravy train may come to a halt (wasted tax payer money) so both sides are doing anything and everything to keep the money (and power) contained to the same group (in and out of Washington). When the established GOP said they would rather have Clinton versus Trump, then you know something is not right. It’s the illusion of democracy.
You’re even seeing the comments from foreign countries about Trump because he is threatening to take away their gravy train money as well….making America, first, again…instead of last (that means keeping some of the money in house).
We already knew Sam was gay, though.
Wood also back-tracked on that some, no doubt because someone high up in the entertainment biz told him he better back off if he knows what’s good for him.
More like FROM the top, I believe, Roosh.
You guys have to start NAMING the perpetrators of all this. It is a worldwide criminal cabal that has totally subverted all Western nations.
Jesus warned us about these demons in human form. They are easily identified, but for some reason you are not allowed to NAME them.
The Jimmy Saville case is truly sickening in that everyone knew but no one said anything because “Jimmy will fix it”. Opening a door to a facility and allowing him to roam free to molest the vulnerable is absolutely astounding. You don’t have to be an intellect to figure out that the blessing to this behaviour came from the higher-ups.
Check out Phillip K Dick. He wrote about the coming (now present) moral relativism in The World That Jones Made.
Great author
I wish we can open the gates of hell in real life and send this being to cleanse the world of elites.
Eh, a couple of things:
1) Don’t live your life in fantasy video games. Yeah, the new Doom is cool, in a juvenile kind of way. There’s a risk of becoming a total beta while living your life through superhero movies and violent video games.
2) In saying that, knowledge is power. I know some people aren’t religious, but God/Jesus/Holy Spirit are violently just. That bit where God asks Joshua to go into the Holy Land for the first time, full of those pedophiles, homosexuals, and murderers? “No mercy. Kill them all.” was the directive. Doomguy is actually performing acts of “malecide”, a Christian notion which explains certain types of deaths aren’t evil. That’s why Europe didn’t succumb to the Ottoman takeover during the Middle Ages.
An interesting review of Doom
You are looking for a superhero? They don’t exist.
Clarification on the picture: The picture is main character from the recent release DOOM video game. A game, where you fight off and kill the hordes of hell release by Satanic cult on Mars. Since we are talking about Satanic cults in upper echelon of power, I thought it be good picture to expression the desire of many of us would do to these sick fucks. Just go on youtube and look at the trailer for the game to understand the reason for the picture.
Adding to what Roosh is saying, take a look at all the flights Bill Clinton made to the private island of known, convicted pedophile Jeff Epstein. Newsweek called Epstein the sex offender who hangs out with princes and premiers. PR flacks would like us to believe they were discussing meat loaf recipes, but I doubt it. Epstein got a slap on the wrist after his conviction. Numerous sources also say Clinton was frequently in the company of young girls while governor of Arkansas, especially while at his half brother’s home.
This documentary details the corruption and body count of the Clintons, and also reveals – with the testimony of several Arkansas State Police officers who were his body guards – just how sexually depraved Clinton is. It briefly touches on his escapades with young girls, too.
What is most concerning is people who break stories like this often end up dying in mysterious ways. Google the Clinton body count. These claims are well known yet never come to light in the media. I’m amazed at what political families get by with the more research I do. But one can only go so far without ending up with lead boots at the bottom of the ocean.
https://youtu.be/qDbCwFm1Cmo
If you have a large group of men willing to deal with the consequence simultaneously digging deep and looking to solve the problem then at least you have good company at the bottom of the ocean.
Funny how none of this ever comes to light in the media. And who owns all media?
Just a Cohencidence of course.
Be aware The Express is not considered a high quality newspaper
Reasonable point. But, name one that is? It can be argued that the express is the only UK newspaper that supports right wing populism as it is defined today and has always been anti establishment
Anti-establishment? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e5ba684f12239979fb890a70b816cb9dbdbea656aad2090210c131e092270c3d.jpg
Nice collage. You make it yourself? Anti establishment in terms of main stream press and the environment to which they operate, yes. Look, I don’t read the express or any other mainstream rags as I don’t think there is a high quality newspaper to which your original point alludes.
Check out the MK Ultra stories (Google it), which will never be verified but are totally compelling. The tunnels under the McMartin preschool were real according to an outside analyst who was hired to examine the site years after it was demolished.
Also: JonBenet Ramsey. Lots of rumors that her father, who was a weapons contractor to the federal government, had started selling his daughter to his friends.
Total bull$hit, like the charges against the Amiraults.
Tunnels are expensive, jammyjaybird,,
They were verified, Mcgill Juniversity admitted its participation in MK Ultra/Project Monarch “experiments”
http://www.mcgilldaily.com/2012/09/mk-ultraviolence/
They also said JS was into necrophilia
Yeah the ((Globalist elite))
Do you believe that Jews are at the very top, or are they the high level managers?
Definitely at the very top, You should read the Talmud Unmasked,
Screwing children is a holy grail of leftists and degenerates.
This whole “child sex change” thing is a gateway: if a kid can decide on a sex change, well then, they will also be allowed to decide on having sex with an adult.
Gay sex education to elementary kids is in fact a way to indoctrinate them into homosexuality to even raping them
Russia has the right idea considering it illegal and pedophilia to teach children gay sex education at such an early age
It’s amazing. You wouldn’t let a seven year old decide to buy a house, you wouldn’t let him decide to get married, you wouldn’t let him decide to quit school. But suddenly you’re going to let him make the most important decision of his life? Whether or not to chop off his dick.
Its sick. These parents should have CPS called on them.
There was a piece on PBS Frontline where parents are delaying their children’s puberty with drugs to make it easier for the little confused ones to transition more easily to their chosen opposite gender. This is like something out of a fucking Kurt Vonnegut novel…
Exactly child sex change os basically trying to legalizing putting hands on a child’s no-no place
It’s so fucking sick
Roosh are you coming to the same conclusions that Henry Makow of henrymakow.com has come to?
As outlandish as it would seem, with all this documented evidence how could it NOT be true?
Wouldn’t be at all surprised, but it’s a lot closer to home than that even.
Two video clips: the dance recital and the pole dance (check this one’s comment section in particular, mostly women). Not sure about posting these, so you’ll have to type http://www.youtube.com into the address bar and paste these at the end:
/watch?v=gIiiBtW46AI
/watch?v=KFAJq0u8NiE
Women (moms, sisters, aunts, friends, feminists) are pushing things like this at local levels, something at one time which would have caused massive community backlash due to inappropriateness.
On the one hand, we know women have no agency and likely don’t put 2 and 2 together to see how this is bad or what could go wrong. On the other it’s like offering a starving person an endless buffet, and let’s not exclude lesbians from this. But what else would one expect from a sex intent on depravity and destruction? They vapidly follow “fun” trends and teach young girls it’s okay to do these things.
Watch to see if it is decriminalized soon (first for women and boys), opting instead for sentences of treatment/therapy programs, that will be the signal that it is really full-on underway.
GoingSane:
RE: KFAJq0u8NiE, too bad about the tattoos, because otherwise the mom is a goddess.
Good Grief! So what in the world is now wrong with pole dancing? Just Google
> Houston Texas pole dancing classes
and you get:
> About 284,000 results (0.40 seconds)
The 10-year-old has an awkward body for dance, but she has obviously had some formal dance training because her feet point as soon as they come off the floor. The instructress, on the other hand, is an amazing female athlete. Notice how effortlessly she pops up from a kneeling position on the floor in this video. (Too bad about those tattoos, of course…)
But speaking of goddesses, I had a dance pole installed at one of my Midwest residences for a couple of ACT-34 big-name-university premed princesses. OMG, what amazing athleticism they displayed on it! But again, both were serious dance students in their younger days. (By the way, they learned that their street clothes did not have enough “grip” on a dance pole, but their skin did, and, as luck would have it, they were both naked under their clothes.)
You sound like like one of those weird guys who has never dated a “real” dancer, much less been a professional ballerina’s pas-de-deux partner. You probably aren’t even a professional-grade masseur with your own massage table! Let me say that I know for *sure* that the butt of a Karol Helms (the instructress) is harder than even *my* biceps ever were. A real dancer’s body doesn’t even feel *human*–it feels better than that–closer to the consistency of a marble statue.
Now, as for the 12-year-olds doing the “sexy” dance routine you decry first (gIiiBtW46AI), their problem is that they are *non*-dancers trying to do a dance routine. Compare their movements with that of the 10-year-old whose video follows theirs:
XSdF1cun1nY
and you will see the “snap” and “sparkle” of a seriously dance-trained little girl (and one with some serious aptitude for the sport).
If everywhere you look, even when you are beholding female physical grace and athleticism (or even the lack thereof), you see perverted sex, perhaps you should spend more time looking in a mirror for the root problem.
In the 1980s-1990s, Satanic Ritual Abuse became a heavily covered topic because so many people were coming forward with repressed childhood memories of sexual/satanic abuse, and also the news coverage of the McMartin preschool trial. Many of these cases involved high-ranking members of local governments and local communities. However, as more and more cases came to light, supposed experts started stating that there was no evidence of such abuse, and began claiming that irresponsible psychologists were using suggestive questioning to plant these memories in the victims’s heads. What isn’t well known are that some of the leading experts who have postulated the False Memory Syndrome were pedophiles, or showed support for pedophiles.
One such expert, named Dr. Ralph Underwager, was quoted as saying: “What I have been struck by as I have come to know more about and understand people who choose pedophilia is that they let themselves be too much defined by other people. That is usually an essential negative definition. Pedophiles spend a lot of time and energy defending their choice. I don’t think a pedophile needs to do that.” He was a founding member of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation.
Two other false memory experts, Paul and Shirley Eberle, had a magazine in the 1970s called Finger. It featured hardcore pornography, much of which featured girls who appeared underage, but were never proven to be underage. It also had illustrated features such as “Sexpot at Five.”
Now, if you google Satanic Ritual Abuse, you’ll mainly find links with the CIA term “conspiracy” riddled throughout. What I find interesting is that the people pushing False Memory Syndrome are usually linked with pedophilia in one way or another. If that’s not a clear-cut agenda, then I don’t know what is. Make adults whose repressed memories suddenly surface seem crazy, and blame the therapists trying to help them for planting supposed false memories in their heads.
As a personal aside, someone very close to me experienced satanic ritual abuse as a child, with the memories surfacing in this person’s adult years. This person’s memories didn’t surface as a result of counseling, they came sporadically, and not just via images. For example, this person smelled blood for several days before finally recalling a human sacrifice that was witnessed. This person also freaked out upon seeing a piece of tubing because something similar was used during an episode of sexual abuse. Many of the people involved with these rituals had status within the community, working in law enforcement or other government jobs, or simply being wealthy.
This type of depravity is rampant, and infects all levels of leadership. If you think they couldn’t find enough people to abuse/kill, check out missing persons databases from time to time, and you’ll see a ton of people who have never been seen or heard from again. Who knows what happened to them?
Ask Martha Coakley about the Fells Acres ritual satanic child abuse case. Her efforts to keep Gerald Amirault behind bars for crimes *no one* committed cost her/the Democrats first Teddy Kennedy’s senate seat and then the governorship of Massachusetts!
It was amazing to see the Opinion pages of THE NATION and THE WALL STREET JOURNAL agree that the bitch was unfit for high office.
The elite are addicted to the feeling of power. So when monetary acquisition no longer gives ’em their jollies, they move on to other things. And like addicts, they become more and more desperate for their fix until they do things they would never have imagined they would do.
They deserve pity, but the need for justice is greater. Only time shall bring all these, as time heals all wounds.
Most pedophiles are gay and assault boys. In a case study of sex offenders and pedophiles 2/3 of them identified as gay married with a woman or not.
People that enjoy disgusting things that is outlawed in their country tend to try and rise into power to practice it. Look at catholic popes (for little boys), every gangster and mafia (for drugs), there is in fact openly gay politicians that were caught for having sex with underaged boys.
Well that certainly explains many things that on the surface seem “out of sorts” – by that I mean certain individuals who get elected and say they are going to do “such and so” but then later they are doing the exact opposite. When confronted (at least the very first time they are confronted) they appear fearful, or resigned – and then mumble some pablum. Examples would include various senators who were “staunchly against illegal immigration” but now are for amnesty. What occurred? What do the power brokers have on them?
Then you have that whole thing going on over at Bohemian Grove with the Owl statue and such.
Roosh you might enjoy the TV show “Game of Silence”, is related.
It all starts with feminism, and its trope “sexuality is a social construct.” Yet the same group of people when arguing for perverse rights say “they were born that way.” The pervert becomes the natural, and the natural becomes the pervert. This is all a part of the cultural marxist’s tactic of “truth inversion.”
For the sake of the argument, take Nickerson at his word that he’s never actually molested or abused a child; believe him when he says his pedophilia consists solely of fantasies with the occasional involvement of his right hand and a bottle of lotion. So how do you make the behaviour of Nickerson and the like illegal without passing “The Thoughtcrime Act”?
You cannot.
But you can start a opposition that encourage people to think even worse of the pedos than they do today. Slowly but surely we may get back to the state where inmates convicted of child molesting only survived 2-3 days in prison.
It’s already like that. If a pedophile told anyone other than another pedophile of his proclivities, he would be shunned and shamed; that he didn’t act on his urges would merely spare him from imprisonment, not earn him societal acceptance. And prisons still have a separate wing for nonces as they WOULD only survive a few days if they were put in with the general population of inmates and word of the nature of their crimes got around.
But the fact that these wings are constructed today indicates a weakening of the resistance against the perverts.
Remove them.
I’m not familiar with the prison system or it’s history – I always thought there’d been special wings for sex offenders, ex-cops and such since the end of the days when you’d be hanged for sheep-rustling and apple-scrumping, though I’ll accept I’m wrong if you say that’s not the case.
I don’t agree with removing the special wings and throwing the nonces in with the other inmates – not because I don’t think child molesters should get what’s coming to them; because leaving the job of giving the nonces their just desserts to other inmates, who will probably receive extra years on their sentence for delivering those just desserts, is cowardly on the part of the system. If you think that pedos should be castrated with a rusty razor blade then make that their official sentence – don’t leave it up to other prisoners to do the judge’s job.
It used to be religion that placed the fear of God into people for having these thoughts. People simply did not talk about it.
So you don’t object to Nickerson’s thoughts/fantasies so much as you object to his talking about them?
the problem is he talks about it and then society normalizes it. if you can’t see that, then you are the problem…
Disclaimer: I’m not saying that theft is a crime of comparable enormity to child molestation.
But I see it like this: if somebody is a kleptomaniac who has strong urges to steal but doesn’t act on them, it would be to everyone’s benefit if they came clean about their urges so that they and their social circle can help them stay out of situations where they might be tempted to steal. This might involve things like getting their friends/family to do their shopping for them so they don’t have to go into a store, not getting a job where they’ll be in charge of stock/cash which they might be tempted to embezzle, not being left alone with other people’s valuables and so on. Society shuns and shames thieves – and rightly so – but that doesn’t mean we should demonise people who say they can’t trust themselves not to steal in certain situations. If you had a friend with latent kleptomania, would you rather he came clean and told you not to leave your valuables lying around when he’s with you or would you rather he kept quiet and struggled against his urges until he succumbed and nicked your phone after you left it on a table at a house party? Also, a kleptomaniac’s family could encourage him to get any therapy he needed.
Likewise, if one of my friends were a pedophile, I would much rather he told me “Look, I have these urges I’m struggling against, so for everyone’s sake don’t ask me to babysit your kids.” Than have him quietly struggle to control his urges till he ended up abusing my (hypothetical) children. Also, a pedophile’s family could encourage him to get any therapy and medical treatment (like chemical castration) he needed.
What you are assuming here is that people lack self control.
I enjoy driving fast, but I don’t do it because I understand it would case deadly harm to others. Does that mean that I should never drive, even if I admit that I like to drive fast?
If anyone tells me they have that Godforsaken thing for kids, I would cut all association with that person, period. I would have thoughts of something heinous to that person, but I don’t act out on it.
BTW, you automatically presumed a sicko to be a “he” in your post. There are both male and female sickos in this world. See how you’ve been brainwashed to think women can do no wrong?
I don’t assume that people lack self control, I just think it better in some circumstances for people to avoid situations where they will be tempted. As for your example, there’s a difference between liking to drive fast and having an urge to drive fast which is so strong that all your concentration is directed towards fighting that urge. If you just like to drive fast but have no problem with sticking to speed limits, fine, keep driving. But if you have an urge to drive fast which is so strong that you’re barely paying attention to anything but your speedometer then it probably would be a good idea for you to cadge a lift or take the bus.
I know that there are female sickos too; I was using ‘he’ in the sense of ‘person of unknown gender’. Only SJWs insist that one must say ‘he or she’ whenever one refers to someone whose gender is not known.
No, not the fear of God, but the ‘fear of Hell’. Two different things. Fearing God is a type of virtue, because when you contemplate His immensity, you don’t think of Him as a simple Sky Father like the pagans do e.g Jesus didn’t like it when His followers just wanted Him to perform food miracles.
‘Fearing Hell’ is remembering what happens when you are in a state of sin. There’s no forgiveness after death, and death can come at any time. Whether you’re in mortal sin by swearing at your father, or rubbing one off to children, the fear of hell should help prevent you from succumbing to evil acts habitually.
–
As for errant sexuality, it’s been on the rise. Bad society normalizes bad sex practices. “heterosexual” malpractices became the norm (begetting divorces, abortions, single parenthood and broken families) before homosexuality and now pedophile crimes.
So, Todd Dickerson is not a pedo because he hasnt made physical contact with any children, but a man should be labelled a rapist for checking a woman out?
Now youre getting it. And if its a white man, well he has probably already raped womyn.lock him away forever. Or better yet #killallwhitemen
if it was a non white guy, then it never happened. Remember, 2+2=5
I guess it was only a matter of time. Hopefully this breaks people’s illusions that there is a stopping point. That there is a low that they won’t sink to, because there isn’t. Heard conservatives say (as if that word means anything) that gay marriage won’t lead to anything else. That this and that are fine etc. Give them an inch and they take one hundred miles. Giving in in any capacity only emboldens them. There is no compromising with this enemy.
Valuing children is a white, European, CHRISTIAN virtue.
We cannot defend, nor can we attack so long as we allow our faith to be a joke. We need to stop allowing our enemies portraying our religion as one of ignorant bumpkins. We need to stop conceeding that the whole is worthless if a part is silly.
I agree that the generally r-selected nonwhite peoples tend to devalue their children. I do not agree with your typically self-righteous notion that your Torahic faith is the prerequisite to being anything but a scoundrel and a kiddy fiddler.
White, Western civilization did not begin with the Torah or with the Testament. The pre-Christian white Italic, Celtic, and Germanic peoples did not widely sodomize children, despite what stupid cable shows and homosexual revisionist “historians” often repeat.
I do not portray common buffet Christians, who understand that private faith can exist separate from worldly affairs, as bumpkins. Christmas trees in town squares and the phrase, “Merry Christmas,” do not offend or trigger me. I do, however, tease the Christians, most of whom are kosher evangelicals, who Jewishly try to make everyone kiss their ring and then claim that their religion is somehow under attack, just because their schools, businesses, and government can no longer deepthroat us with the Protestant God and Christ as they once did.
So instead of using the ill temper of an imaginary bearded alpha male in the sky to condemn homosexuality (of which pederasty is an inseparable part), let us use more credible worldly arguments like shortened lifespan, prevalence of GRID, prevalence of buggery in cases of homosexual adoption, the strong correlation of pedophilia with homosexuality, and the prominence of NAMBLA in the early homosexual movement.
( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association#History )
( https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-correlation-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia )
Atheism leads to moral decay. Feminism is an atheist thing. Indulging in sexual depravity or any depravity is an atheist thing. Hedonism and nihilism are the enemy of civilization.
You can only reach those with an atheistic mindset.
That a population moves away from god is one of the earliest things to happen in the decline of a civilization. The ideology that has proven to be the most destructive and has the highest kill count isn’t equipped to raise a civilization to greatness.
Also, yes children weren’t sodomized but they were still devalued before Christianity.
That is a different argument, in a way. I only said that your Torahic faith self-righteously presumes to hold the monopoly on morality, including the notion that tampering with children is wrong. The Roman civilization coercively inculcated that Oriental Semitic faith during the tail end of its life.
Though you might argue that certain religions helped the classical Western or Oriental civilizations tread above hedonism and anarchy, you do, of course, know that those religions were false. The burden is on you to prove that your Mosaic-derived religion is any more worthy of my faith than Roman or Germanic paganism deserves your faith.
Otherwise, I will continue to base my morality on what is good for a peaceful society and the (Darwinistic) future of my progeny and race, rather than being a pedophilic hedonist who suppresses his awful urges only because of the magical proscriptions and threats of a man in a robe, as Christians seem to project onto everyone else.
The feminism and murderous Bolshevism to which you refer was and is only atheist in three parentheses
( http://www.returnofkings.com/72572/why-is-there-a-prolific-jewish-presence-in-the-american-feminist-movement , https://i.sli.mg/nyQmNa.jpg ).
It is a red herring to argue that anyone was ever killed in the name of nonbelief. Though I am against leftist “sins of the father” hokum and Darwinistically pro-white-survival, you cannot say that Christians never genocided or oppressed anyone like the Germanic pagans, Slavs, Gaelic Irish, feather Indians, or dot Indians (and yes, I omit the Arabs because I know the Crusades to have been defensive wars against the savage and exceedingly pious Islam).
It is amusing that a community which was created to teach frustrated men how to prolifically fornicate suddenly became the torchbearer of decent Christian civilization and dominionism.
I believe that nonbelief doesn’t exist. If atheism was just a lack of faith you wouldn’t have an opinion on the matter. Yet atheists clearly state that gods don’t exist.
“It is a red herring to argue that anyone was ever killed in the name of nonbelief.”
My point on atheism is simple: When someone throws away all objective actual value he doesn’t have values anymore. No matter what additional ideology he might want to follow it will always be destructive in nature.
As said hedonism and nihilism are both atheistic.
“…you cannot say that Christians never genocided…” (Respect for the just averagely evil crusaders)
Firstly, there are always humans that would do evil regardless of what ideology they say to follow.
So, we have to look at wether their deeds are backed up by their ideology.
“Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”
The bible states that you should judge Christians and people in general according to their deeds.
It also acknowledges the existence of people that do evil things in the name of god.
Those people are by definition of the bible not Christian.
“It is amusing…”
I get were you come from. As you know however I don’t like hedonism and yet I am here.
When we look at other alt-right movements we see a glaring problem: They are being subverted by women.
What was that with “holy vessels of civilization” again? What complete ironic crap.
Here however we find men that really first came together to learn game but in the process we also learn what is wrong with women today.
I am here because ROK is the last place to be subverted and MGTOW doesn’t work for civilizations.
Cultural Marxists can – oh, and do they ever – baselessly run their mouths and fingers, preach, judge, and damn people with the best of the traditionalist Christian ministers and clergy. The only edge we have over the Cultural Marxists is in observable, falsifiable worldly truth.
That is the main thrust of my argument and what I want people to read and understand, even if they ignore the rest of my post.
“I believe that nonbelief doesn’t exist. If atheism was just a lack of faith you wouldn’t have an opinion on the matter. Yet atheists clearly state that gods don’t exist.”
In other words, you have nonbelief in nonbelief. If virtually everyone on Return of Kings suddenly declared the Mohammedan Shahada in the latest comments section, started sticking their backsides into the air five times a day, and made blatantly scornful remarks about disbelievers in Islam; even calling infidels (since Islam’s prophet was a pederast) dog-molesters; then you might have the notion to opine on your nonbelief in Islam, if for no other reason than to dispel the false appearance of consensus – and there is no consensus as likely to be false as one which is coercively maintained. You do have nonbelief in nonbelief, just as you do in all the myriad modern religions except Christianity.
“When someone throws away all objective actual value he doesn’t have values anymore” (emphasis mine).
Merriam-Webster on “objective:” “based on facts rather than feelings or opinions.” Well, the facts of the world, as most of us know, decidedly support the (admittedly somewhat nebulous) alternative right cause, particularly where women are concerned. The Christian faith, on the other hand, is more of a crapshoot. Every day, Western ministers preach repugnant falsehoods like, “Happy wife, happy life,” and that Christians must mindlessly and unrequitedly devote themselves to God’s people and their nation of Israel, or else God will punish them.
You know the treachery of the sitting Roman pontiff; the Orthodox, whose leaders went with that foot-sucker to make love to the so-called refugees in Greece, and the Protestant umbrellas are no politically higher than the infamy of Francis. If most Christians are false, then you cannot expect a reasonable man to come into the right house of the Lord. Christianity has politically, let alone scientifically, obsoleted itself.
“…there are always humans that would do evil regardless of what ideology they say to follow.”
There is your No True Scotsman, Get Out of Jail Free card which you yoink from non-Christians and the irreligious. You and your ilk are quick to judge all irreligious humanity (atheists, agnostics, Deists; whatever) for the words and actions of the Jewish Bolsheviks, Bill Nye, Richard Dawkins, or a minority of nihilistic punks. Yet, with all the intellectual dishonesty and pretentiousness that one needs to foist people into believing the unbelievable in the first place, you pigeonhole the irreligious into a defendant’s chair and judge us by a different standard from that with which you judge your own faith.
“…MGTOW doesn’t work for civilizations.”
Not one bit. However, I refuse to believe that one must be threatened by eternal torture to function in a civilization without stealing, raping, and murdering left and right. The Christian and Mosaic faiths have no legitimate claim of authorship of the human proscriptions against these things. We can and do have laws and mores which exist here on the ground.
Cut the emotional parts and it would only be half as long.
“In other words, you have nonbelief in nonbelief.”
Nonbelief would be to not have an opinion on it. My opinion on nonbelief is that it doesn’t exist for humans.
With the next part I agree in a way. Except that it is baseless with a nihilistic faith.
“There is your No True Scotsman,…”
Please, when we cannot take the definition of the bible and the word of the Christ as to what a Christian is then we don’t have a rational definition anymore.
Should we just take their word for it?
“You and your ilk are quick to judge all irreligious humanity…”
Yes, we do and that’s a good thing. You have the most destructive ideology by fact and you stand for the valueless degradation of society.
I don’t want to insult you, but your kind has never achieved civilization.
As a matter of fact your kind only arises in a safe environment when the civilization had reached its peak and is about to decline.
You are obviously a proper man with the right ideas about society, but they are baseless.
In other words, all men are rapists – monsters incapable of civilized behavior – unless instructed regularly to quake in fear of a power whenever we have rapey thoughts.
You have crossed the line in waving off half my statements as “emotional,” unless you in fact disagree that mainline Christianity is well left of the alt-right and that the actions of the sitting Roman pontiff et al. can reasonably be called repugnant and infamous.
You are wrong in so ardently espousing the virtues of a faith, which is baseless by definition (Being written in an old book does not make something true), and then having the ignorance to call my laboriously explained belief in securing a future for my descendants and race, not to mention simply having a good, white civilization in which to live, baseless. The only muddy foundation you can lay down is the same old circular logic and browbeating. Something is wrong when the accepted truth must be so coercively upheld.
“…your kind has never achieved civilization.”
Not your kind (Christians) have achieved the first civilization around the Tigris and Euphrates and several subsequent civilizations. You are a heathen according to all their dead religions – as well as to most professed Christians, who are not of your sect – but I am supposed to kiss the ring of Christendom and that only…just because God, speaking to me not unassisted (oh, never) but through some God-pimp minister, says it is good for me and society.
That might work on the rubes who believe whatever salesman’s bullshit some loudmouth in a black Protestant robe or Papist bling says, but you get no cigar from me.
http://www.americaisachristiannation.com
I took the only ones I thought were worth it.
Tell me what this is:
“baselessly run their mouths and fingers, preach, judge, and damn people with the best of the traditionalist Christian ministers and clergy.”
That isn’t an argument nor is it mind blowing. Logic can be sumed up in few words.
That aside I can tell that you are simply trying to bash Christianity. This is fruitless as Christianity cannot compete with atheism when it comes to destructiveness and subvertiveness.
“You are wrong in so ardently espousing the virtues of a faith,…”
You are yet avoiding that atheism is the most destructive ideology which I have demonstrated by fact.
It is simple. You either have virtues or you don’t. History and reason show that atheism is detrimental to that. The best proof that atheism is that way is that it is in observable fact that way.
To draw a comparison that someone has virtues over another you only need to look at them.
On the one side we have the majority of people that follow theism, they do some evil things but it could be said that they are average as most of the world is theistic.
On the other side we have a few people that follow their belief of atheism, they have managed to have a higher kill count than the rest of the wars in history of the world combined,despite only being a minority and only being recently relevant for a short time.
The conclusion is simple.
“Not your kind (Christians)…”
That is not the point. The point was that atheism is only strong in the death rows of a civilization. There was never an atheistic civilization from the ground up. And there never will be.
You have demonstrated and reasoned through nothing, nor have you named a single civilization that fell due to lack of religion. Judging, in a smug manner that would draw envy from the most obnoxious fedora-tipping reddit atheist, based upon the actions of the Talmudic Bolsheviks and their statetheist adherents is a meaningless red herring.
“That aside I can tell that you are simply trying to bash Christianity.” Boo-fucking-hoo, you can’t burn heathens at the stake anymore, so you cry persecution like every Jew does whenever someone challenges open borders for the goyim or any other aspect of their rotten agenda. Christians are the ones claiming all men are rapists except good, virtuous God(s)-fearers; of course I will object to that.
You like brevity; I’ll simply ask you to do what no smug, self-righteous Christian can ever do, and that is tell me why I should believe any of the crap in your old, several-times-translated book. Prove it. You can’t.
Civilizations fall because of abandoning values. Moral relativism is a natural for atheists.
We just have to look around. Where do you think atheism is most prevalent? In the declining western nations of course. Where is theism prevalent? In third world countries and patriarchies.
“based upon the actions of the Talmudic Bolsheviks and their statetheist adherents is a meaningless red herring.”
“Talmudic” ? You mean those massmurderers that hated religion?
“Red herring” This is not how this fallacy works. I have made a point that atheism is the most destructive ideology because it leads to hedonism and nihilism.
I have proven this point by taking the short atheistic history and present into account.
“”That aside I can tell that you are simply trying to bash Christianity.” Boo-fucking-hoo,….”
I could care less about your bashing of Christianity if you would atleast for once not use it to deflect from getting to the topic.
“Prove it. You can’t.”
I won’t because I don’t care. I have made my point on atheisms devious, destructive nature and this point still stands as you haven’t provided anything against it.
It was your turn all along in my book.
But as a matter of fact this doesn’t lead anywhere. We should stop this before it becomes a matter of dignity.
(((Atheist))) Bolsheviks. If they truly were as you say, then they would have razed at least one synagogue. No one was ever murdered in the name of indifference.
Putting forth the third world and the very pious (much more so than most mediocre white people who call themselves “Christian” just to fit in) Muslim world as superior examples of civilization is inadvisable.
One thing is clear: that you have no faith in your religion but as a worldly means to feel belonged and superior, or else you would have made an argument for Christianity rather than against irreligion.
They never quite can do that, even though they are the ones making the fantastical claims.
I am the one saying that they are atheistic.
That was my point. There are atheistic Jews.
I also never said that the third world is superior. My point here is that civilizations that are just on the rise, and thus logically not in decline, are theistic.
As soon as the decline comes, atheism comes.
“…have made an argument for Christianity rather than against irreligion.”
Firstly, your attacks on my person are no argument. Secondly, to reveal what is great it is best to show what isn’t.
Do you even read my comments anymore?
As you clearly demonstrate right now this discussion leads nowhere. As such I had suggested to end it. I have made my point.
Talking about “Torahic” faiths is the type of stuff the liberal intelligentsia uses to feel smart. It’s icky. Just use the terms Judaism and Christianity, and if you need to break it down further, use pre-18th century terms for the different strands of Judaism and Christianity (if people feel excluded from those simple terms, then great. We’re not trying to be inclusive). But “Abrahamic faith” and “Judeo-Christianity” is like trying to take Common Era and Before Common Era seriously. It’s worthy of a pimp slap. And yes, you can offer the other cheek to my hand too if you think it’s acceptable to use it.
But anyway, neither Judaism or Christianity claimed to have invented western morality in time. Anyone that does so is ignorant. But Christianity (which includes Judaic belief up to the Second Temple) was famously able to synthesise the pagan philosophy and sciences of the the Greeks with its revelations in its Byzantine practice, and then advance it by unprecedented amounts in its Roman Catholic Christendom practice. Until this day, nothing else has come close to advancing civilisation on all fronts like Western Christendom.
Unfortunately, Protestantism — of which derives liberalism, agnosticism and atheism — ground everything to a halt in the 15th century. We won’t willingly be going back to Christendom though. We’d rather impale ourselves collectively than admit we were ever at fault.
Before I go on, I must point out that none of the replies to me so far have convinced me, nor have they even attempted to convince anyone, of Christianity’s truthfulness.
“Torahic” is my way of poking fun at Christianity’s Jewish heritage, which is especially cheeky now that we, at least in the alt-right, are becoming increasingly wise to Jewish mischief (Not too long ago, RoK had a more hush-hush attitude toward antisemitic comments). I also use the common “Christianity” and phrases like “buffet Christian” and “evangelical,” and plenty of other common language.
As for the term “Judeo-Christianity” which you bring up, it reflects a sick, servile way of thinking which has mainly been sold to American Protestants. But it is still worth noting that the wider Christendom did indeed adopt a holy text of the Jewish people as the larger book of the Bible.
You seem to understand that neither Judaism nor Christianity invented Western morality and that Christendom has died a slow death largely (as I, too, am convinced) due to Martin Luther’s actions. But look at how most white European invention, exploration, and conquest came after the Buffet Christian Reformation. For that reason, I refuse to be so reactionary to say that medieval theocratic monarchy is the answer to our worldly racial and cultural woes, most of which only really manifested themselves in the past century.
My main reason, though, for rejecting Christianity is my simple inability to believe those stories – or, in fact, that most professed Christians actually believe them under no physical social compulsion.
Valuing children was not a particularly obvious trait of Christian Victorian London, and most times and places in Christendom were even worse. Nowhere in the Bible is there any condemnation of pedophilia, certainly not of the clarity of Leviticus against homosex. Jesus even heals the boy-child slave of a centurion, who was more than likely a catamite, and Jesus even praises the centurion for his supposed great faith in only asking for healing at a distance – not coincidentally keeping Jesus from seeing the boy.
There’s no record of pederasty being prohibited until the reign of Justinian, about 528 A.D., and he did it so he could seize the property of wealthy men, those favoring the wrong sports team, and credibly threaten the bishops. (Contemporary Procopius alleges multiple witnesses that Justinian was literally a demon in human form.)
someone needs to put Todd out of his misery………
I’m sure he’ll ‘commit suicide’ before too much longer.
Get ready for “[politician] rails against pedophilia because he’s secretly a latent repressed pedophile” attacks. The left pretty much shut up about Dennis Hastert because it’s still a sin of the left to equate homosexuality and pedophilia in any way. That could change in a decade!
I keep hearing the saying “the sky hasn’t fallen after homosexual marriage”. This just a year after the whole debacle was “approved”. Just wait…..
It’s like saying cancer doesn’t kill you immediately. Already we have decided that something that isn’t in the constitution, gay marriage, trumps something that is in the constitution, the free exercise of religion.
I sense that this may be boiling the frog too quickly though. You have to be some kind of insensate monster to not care about protecting children.
I think mainstreaming of pedophilia, particularly this fast, would really be enough to start some kind of neo-revolution/rebellion. Homosexuality has very little direct impact on folks, and Trannies only have slightly more impact, if at all. But pedophilia would easily be a step over the edge for anyone but the most glazed over SJWs.
But glorifying Trannies is socially unhealthy. Yeah, I don’t really care if you have a sick twisted fetish on an individual level, but would you, for example, continue to live in a neighborhood if half your neighbors were trannies?
It’s the kind of thing where it’s such a non-issue, except for how they constantly talk about it and shove it in our faces, to the point where it becomes like being proud of a fat body, or proud to be a slut or anything else degenerate that they celebrate.
To me, it’s just another step down the road of degenerate collapse. It seems like a big jump to you, but they have assaulted my moral senses so much over the past 10 years that hearing this story is no longer even that shocking to me.
I hope you are right, but I think they are programming the future generations to be more “tolerant” of this crap, thus only old curmudgeons like us would complain. I hope I’m wrong on this.
Yeah, you would think mainstreaming SODOMY so fast would have started a revolution.
I’m also convinced that all the media focus on sexual details has led us here. When someone famous commits a crime (think Justin Beiber or Lindsey Lohan or any of those millionaire actresses who can’t stop stealing stuff), sure, the tabloid media covers it. But they don’t go into the detailed description of the crime the way they will if it is sexual. Then, we will know every little detail.
Instead of just saying “OK, President Clinton got a blowjob.” They give a play by play account of everything that went down, what everyone was wearing, where it happened, what gift was given (Leaves of Grass). The same with every sex case ever, the same with every pedo case ever.
The mere fact of hearing these details of say, Coach Sandusky showering with elementary kids, or for how many seconds Michael Jackson embraced a kid while shirtless, all this stuff just normalizes aberrant sexual behavior. It’s basic NLP and social programming. Plus when the idol celebrities do it, it becomes behavior to be copied.
It’s the same M.O. they did with any other sick behavior, fatness, sluttiness, gayness in media and sitcoms. First you just put it out there: Here’s some slut, here’s a fat character, here’s a gay character. Then a decade later, you actually make that the protagonist, and make the athletic straight white male the dumbass or the butt of all the jokes.
Exactly.
You dont have to agree with the propaganda to work.
Exposure is enough.
And WHO are ((((they))))?
Every
Fucking
Time
WTF… I have three daughters an AK47, AR15, a glock 17 and about enough ammo to take on a small army. Your move you degenerate SJW pedophiles motherfuckers.
This is one of the end goals of sexual liberation and liberal values in general. Condition everyone to accept all types of behaviours, no matter how immoral or unnatural these can be, and its working (homo, trans, lesbo, dog lovers in Germany etc…).
In the perfect world there are only two ways 2 ways to deal with people carrying this psychiatric disorder:
– Capital punishment for any sexual offence committed on a minor. ( punishment & dissuation)
– All those inclined towards pedophilia should report themselves or be reported for a psych evaluation and eventually castration. (prevention)
This might sound harsh to the ordinary person (an idiot) but child molestation destroys families and breeds new child molesters. Governments spend millions managing these people, putting them on sex offender lists, relocating them, issuing them free psych appointments. The two points mentioned above keeps it quick and simple for everyone.
Pedoliphia is mental illness as well all the other conditions you list above. I do not think castration would be the cure
No, it would definitely be the cure. What you meant to say is that you don’t think it would be the right cure?
“Bigot”… Know what, call me ANY fucking name under the sun, I’ll even throw in a few extra suggestions in for you to make it fair. Call me a “cum-soaked-democrat-dinner-napkin”, or a call me “shit-stained-old-lady-underwear-wearing-republican”, just know that kids are OFF-FUCKING-LIMITS.
Normal Western People are the MOST TOLERANT people in the history of humanity. But we have our limits, and people who support pedophiles are the other side of those limits.
The Left better be read to (literally!) die on this hill, because a lot of us have already made that decision long ago, and it is NOT the decision the left will like. I’m ready to kill over this issue, and I know that NO JURY ON EARTH would ever convict me.
That is the best counter argument to the new bathroom issue that the federal government is trying to get involved in, in many states.
People have not had their rights to use the bathroom removed…they just want to use any bathroom. If you have children, then this is a big issue.
I agree..it’s up to you to protect your family.
Who’s behind Salon?
MANAGEMENT
Chief Executive Officer: Jordan Hoffner
Editor in Chief: David Daley
Chief Financial Officer: Elizabeth Hambrecht
Vice President, Sales: Matthew Sussberg
Director of Product and Development: Rachel Hagen
Director of Engineering: Jason Chelliah
I count at least 5 members of the Tribe.
EDITORIAL
Editor in Chief: David Daley
Executive Editor: Pete Catapano
Deputy Editor: Peter Finocchiaro
Cover Editor: Jacob Sugarman
I count at least 1 member of the Tribe.
And so forth and so on….
Every.Single.Fucking.Time
Their noses sticking out from every hole
They’re always behind everything sick and vile. I bet many others on the list are also with Gentile names. They have mastered the art of influencing the masses and pushing their agendas.
What every pedophile needs:
A bullet.
God bless this father. He did what he had to do.
I will gladly vote to acquit any HERO who shoots a child molester.
This is exactly what would happen to anyone who does this to my children. Consequences be damned. I’ll happily face prison if necessary.
The story has a happy ending. The loving father only got 5 years probation and 300 hours of community service.
I can envision an even happier ending: jury nullification of all charges and the pedophile’s body hanged in front of the courthouse with a sign that says “this is what happens to child molesters around here.”
How can anyone expect a man to live with the fact this degenerate was fucking his child?
I’m really surprised it doesn’t happen more often.
It should.
“Don’t you bigots miss the good ol’ times?” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2vHxDEvkAI
What the fuck is this? Jesus…
Ten years ago I said to a female student of mine that feminism will lead to the legalization of pedophelia. She said ‘I thought you were intelligent’. I wonder what she will say in ten years from now.
Allahu Akbar, probably.
I am convinced that the only moral code left is the criminal code because it legislates morality. We choose not to engage in illegal behavior because of the consequences. Before this was family and religion, which instilled morality. We were taught not to do bad things because it is wrong.
I would argue that this push for pedophilia is a consequence of the absence of morality, which is the result of failing marriages and the decline of religion in our everyday lives. Therefore, the only thing left is the criminal code which criminalizes pedophilia. We must fight to keep this as such.
Furioso is wrong… and evidently a Beta male. He claims monogamy is the natural state of a thriving society. Perhaps he cares to explain why geneticists prove modern humans are descendants of only 40% of past males and 80% of past females? That is to say that societies that thrived and became our evolutionary ancestors were evidently POLYGYNOUS, not monogamous.
Why the FUCK is he defending monogamy, anyway?! Not only is he wrong on this point, but monogamy is also the refuge of the loser Beta male who cannot compete with Alphas. It’s shameful to promote such eugenics. Without polygyny men wouldn’t be larger, stronger, and smarter than women, do you realize?
Why don’t you go look at some monogamous species and tell me if you can tell the males and females apart? Furioso is – through his ignorance – promoting the death of masculinity.
I’d say a lot of members of the manosphere have varying stances on social issues, and Furioso probably champions monogamy because he’s not into girls who recently just got off the cock carousel. Nonetheless, I believe monogamy is possible neither in women nor in men in this day and age, when the concept of sex is introduced to us early on in life where we’re about to become sexually aware anyway. Polygyny is preferable because of the fact that the superior gene traits will be more present in the gene pool of a species as a result of spreading your jizz around in multiple chicks. Not everyone is going to be a virgin when they meet someone new to bang; it is what it is.
I don’t like sluts, either. I just finished with my first wife with who I have kids and I will soon remarry a new bride, have more kids, then once she’s through her best fertile years I’ll rinse and repeat the act. The women I look for are chaste teenagers.
This is polygynous behavior, and it’s the sort of behavior that created modern man – a handful of Alphas in a society moving from woman to woman to use up their fertility. THIS is what RoK ought to be about.
Except, you know, almost all men were married and reproducing in Western society for like, you know, thousands of years. But besides that…
Dude, you may be producing a lot of children, but you do realise you’re suppose to be rearing them as well? Children don’t grow up well in broken families, of which your actions are firmly making.
It’s not alpha. Part of being an alpha is to think.
At what stage did I give ANY indication whatsoever that I don’t rear my children?! I take great care of them, thanks.
Where’s the proof of that? Hard genetic evidence refutes it, and you couldn’t possibly know how many men in, say, barbarian Gaul were married, anyway. You are lying. Prove you’re not now.
Read Oxford educated anthropologist J.D. Unwin’s Sex and Culture, and what Huxley had to say about Unwin’s findings before leveling cheap ad hominems. Harems are fine, just don’t expect civilized society once openly regressing to that state. Man needs higher ambitions in life than pussy, a fact any man who has had over 100 women wiill realize.
You fail to realize the implications of what I’m saying. We have evolved down a polygynous path for millions of years up to the point where monogamous traits were bred out of our species and sexual dimorphism is the norm. This means, by all the laws of common fucking sense, the vast majority of human progress was made by polygynous men. So why the Hell are you claiming the exact opposite?!
Seems like you are just trolling. What are you basing that on? Your opinion as someone who pedestalizes pussy, and who attacks monogamy while making a comment you’re married? Here’s some science for you.
“Unwin’s conclusions, which are based upon an enormous wealth of carefully sifted evidence, may be summed up as follows. All human societies are in one or another of four cultural conditions: zoistic, manistic, deistic, rationalistic. Of these societies the zoistic displays the least amount of mental and social energy, the rationalistic the most. Investigation shows that the societies exhibiting the least amount of energy are those where pre-nuptial continence is not imposed and where the opportunities for sexual indulgence after marriage are greatest. The cultural condition of a society rises in exact proportion as it imposes pre-nuptial and post-nuptial restraints upon sexual opportunity.”
“The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs.”
My claim is based on evolutionary psychology and biology. You can Google “percent men reproduced” to see the geneticist proof we are historically polygynous, but the sexual dimorphism is enough proof for anybody who knows what they’re looking at.
What conclusion can we come to by knowing we descend primarily from polygynous men? Well, obviously, the conclusion is that polygynous societies exhibited greater reproductive and thus evolutionary success than did the monogamous societies/individuals.
The claim that humans are more successful when monogamous has no basis. If human history is anything to go by then monogamous societies are short-lived and quickly-replaced by polygynous societies.
The very fact that you think the reason those men never reproduced was because sexual competition shows your ignorance. Life was brutish and short and most men died in war and random violence. In such environment most betas back then would turn most “alpha” men of today to a bloody pulp because they would be used to it. Not because some “alpha” (who happens to be a nobody and not a king or a noble according to you) hoarded the women.
The elite Chinese, Indian, Egyptian, Scythian, and Persian men were always polygamous, so far as I can tell. So were the Romans until Christianity, though the primary wife had greater rights than freeborn “usus” and other grades of wives. Concubines and other sex slaves were also common. Jews and Arabs were also generally polygamous, though admittedly it’s questionable if they had civilization of their own. It’s hard to find any ancient civilization that didn’t have elite polygyny. Our own civilization now accepts serial monogamy, which should just as well be called serial polygamy.
War is male-male competition over females. Whether it’s intersexual competition or intrasexual, it doesn’t make a difference. Ask yourself why men had to compete over females to begin with if females were already selecting them? Male-male competition only occurs in polygynous species, and even today females are only choosing to mate with the top 40% of men. Thus, if men stop competing they will again struggle to be selected.
War is more than a competition for females. Is a competition for resources. Females are only one of such resources. Males had to compete because there was no assurance of the prosperity of the lineage, hence war. A poor lineage back then (no lands=poor=good as dead in many cases) meant in most cases no guarantee of offspring survival.
Polyginy is something that has been present throughout the human history, but only a few privileged men were able to beget children with multiple women and ensure those children survived early childhood. Such a feat was only within reach for aristocrats and noblemen in most cases.
My point was that if most men lineages are not present today it wasn’t because airheads rejected them, it was because they (and in many cases their sons) were killed by enemies and their women and daughters became the camp whores of the enemy. Such was the fate in prehistoric times and early civilization, even to the time of Renaissance, war hadn’t changed that much. War was the great balancing factor and the number one cause of death among males, along with random violence (your president Jackson participated in 100 something duels, think about it, he survived, the counterpart died, it means that just by dueling he probably ended with more than a 100 bloodlines, assuming they left no child behind and it wasn’t in 10000 BC, but in the 1820s…)
Resources are only sought by men so they can gain females, thus resources are about reproduction and male-male competition is 100% about reproduction.
As for making the women of defeated enemies slaves, yes that is polygynous behavior. As I said, humans are a polygynous species and monogamous species NEVER behave in this way. To assert it’s just a circumstantial “coincidence” is just showing your ignorance of biology.
No one said humans were by nature monogamous (at least not me). However the level of civilization we have reached is only possible with a high trust environment, only possible with a monogamous society. Polygamous societies are only “sustainable” if there is a male dearth due to war or some condition that could kill off most males. Otherwise you get the Middle East.
That’s the tradeoff, life is not fair so get used to it. Civilization itself is not natural, Senseless killing is natural, so is instinctive mating and infanticide…
It was also common for the winner of duels to marry the widows and daughters of the slaughtered male members of his family/tribe, as well as those of his opponents as a matter of honour seeing as how females could not survive without the support and protection of a man. But like a good male feminist you keep believing that those gals were oppressed “slaves” under the “evil” patriarchy and not super turned on by being included in an alpha’s one man gang bang with girl on girl action. I’m sure they were much happier being married to a broke, weak loser and having to do all the cooking, cleaning, domestic duties and child rearing alone instead of as part of a team of bi sister wives. The only thing that made them even better off was a juniversity degree and piling a 9-5 wage slave job on top of that shit.
Discussing with strawmen must be funny. Nodody said polygamy was unnatural. However civilization is not natural…but infanticide is.
This is a big question.
I think every society can tolerate a certain degree of polygynous behaviour.
But once it reaches a threshold where average men realize their labour will not lead to reproduction, they will stop working.
Once they stop caring about that society… What then? I envision crime and a free-for-all mentality.
Can you name any openly polygynous societies that developed into societies worth living in?
Can you name any monogamous human evolutionary competitor still alive today? No. Polygynous humans wiped them all out.
Also, do you realize that the West – traditionally monogamous – is currently collapsing whilst Islamic societies – polygynous – are growing strong. Polygyny is probably the only salvation the West will find, actually. Otherwise, history will likely repeat itself and the West will collapse in favor of more virile men.
This takeover you speak of can only happen because Western societies have forgotten the meaning of their borders.
If Western countries weren’t sacrificing themselves, these polygynous Muslims would be tripping over each others’ shit.
Whether monogamy leads to this settling down of national borders is a slightly different question.
“Can you name any monogamous human evolutionary competitor still alive today?” Christians. The fact that religion, which enshrines monogamy dominates the world says enough.
The West is only letting the Arabs in because their populations are declining due to failed reproduction practices and they need immigrants to replace the population.
Let me repeat: Western monogamy is a failed reproduction practice and we’re losing out to a polygynous culture.
Christianity hasn’t survived long enough to influence human evolution, and Christianity is on the decline in Islam’s favor, anyway.
Yeah and the Middle East is such a pleasant place to live you can see the European refugees flocking there in the millions /sarc
That’s because Christianity is being actively subverted by the Western elites.
Just for your information: before Islam took over North Africa, it was known as the “granary of Europe”. It wasn’t always the shithole it was now. Everywhere Islam goes, the land gets ravaged.
Christians in the vocation of marriage are suppose to have big families, by the way. It’s the agnostic/atheistic tendencies created by Protestantism which caused the West to stop reproducing at a healthy rate. Traditional Roman Catholic families aren’t afraid to have four or more children, well above the necessary rate for population stability.
My point was that throughout our evolutionary history no monogamous society has survived long enough to affect our evolution. We are naturally evolved to be a polygynous species.
There may be modern examples of polygynous societies failing and monogamous societies succeeding, but that’s the blink of an eye on the scheme of things. When Christian men begin exhibiting the evolutionary affects of monogamy – that is they become smaller, weaker, less masculine, and nearly indistinguishable from Christian females – then I’ll start believing monogamy can succeed where polygyny cannot. That won’t happen in my lifetime, however, and I’m sticking to my virility.
That’s a good excuse. Tell it to natural selection and see if it gives a fuck.
Nope. Serial polygamists, although I believe the Orthodox had a limit of three marriages (given the old spouses were dead). Martin Luther gave a dispensation for concurrent polygamy once. Of course nuns were all married to Christ, who nominally must be the most-married man or god of all time. Also Christianity does not dominate the world. It doesn’t even dominate the Catholic Church.
This has nothing to do with polygamy and is a logical fallacy. The reason for a lower standard of living in the middle east is racial. It was caused by mediterraneans miscegenating with affrican’ts. It’s the same reason the middle east lags behind technologically.
I has already happened, they borrow their wives’ skinny jeans all the time now
Polygamy is one reason, a very big reason why those regions are the way they are. Polygamy creates an environment of extreme sexual competition that equals an extremely low trust society. Polygamy is only sustainable if many or most males of reproductive age die young or if you have other peoples to conquer all the time.
Also, the majority of men are SUPPOSED to fail to reproduce in a healthy society. This competition is what drives individuals to excel and it’s what has driven the evolution and sexual dimorphism of modern man. Hardship breeds greatness, as the Arabs know but the West is shamefully forgetting.
I don’t know any man brave enough to engage in polygamy. One wife is already a handful. Besides monogamy makes more sense, polygamy would be too damn expensive and knowing woman solidarity, you would spend most of your time keeping the peace.
Polygamy might work out, but not in the modern world I don’t think. But monogamy with a few side dishes every now and then can work out nicely. It’s been the Western tradition since forever, at least until a few decades ago.
Polygamy with 3 contemporary western women (if that is possible)?
That just knocks 30 years off your life expectancy.
That was rather my point. In the modern world it just wouldn’t fly well at all. In 1850 on the other hand, it could well work out.
It’s high time to legalize prostitution.
Yep.
Bringing your own genetics forward via normal reproduction is not “eugenics”. Christ dude, hyperbole much?
Forcefully imposing monogamy on a society over thousands of years will affect its evolutionary trajectory. In this case, men will become smaller, weaker, and less masculine, and less distinguishable from females. This is eugenics.
Dude Christ used hyperbole much. 🙂
Its true. If you remove monogamy, humans will revert to being just like the animals. The beta male losers will have nothing to live for and will rebel and overthrow everything, unless the strictest totalitarian tyranny is in place to keep them down. This is why feminism is known as the movement designed to return humanity to living in grass huts.
Oh gods, the Betas are rebelling! I just shit my pants in fear!
Fuck I’m genuinely surprised how many RoK members openly reject the hallmarks of virility.
Yes, as a woman I’m sure you’d love to play a round of “let’s him and you fight. ” Honey, men developed systems of honor, duty, morality, and liberty for very good reasons. I understand that these concepts are foreign to a woman, which is why you should just shut up and do as you’re told with a quiet and gentle spirit.
I’m a man.
Fag
My name is “Beau”, so of course I was bullied in school as “Little Bo Peep”. I eventually out-grew my class-mates and took up kick-boxing. Who’s gayer in the end? The man who’s called “Little Bo Peep” or the man who gets beaten up by Little Bo Peep? That turned the joke round. I can behave like an utter faggot and I’m still more of a man than them or you.
Shut up you stupid troll, one day you say you’re a woman, the next you say you’re a man. This is unethical behavior. Be yourself or just be anonymous.
It is unwise to underestimate masses of horny Betas with sly bastards riling them up.
“Virtuous Pedophiles” has to be the biggest oxymoron I’ve heard of in a while.
lol
It made me sick to my stomach when I read that. Apparently, I’m supposed to feel sorry for pedphiles? Fuck that. Kill them all.
NOW you’re talking.
Maybe it won’t be long before we hear the phrase ‘paedo power’ in the left wing press.
If I hate pedophiles, does that make me a ‘Virtuous Bigot’?
Then I am a loud, proud and out BIGOT.
I remember my defense I would use against my friends when they’d arbitrarily say I was being a bigot: “I hate everyone EQUALLY!” Is it really being bigoted when you discriminate against everyone on an equal level?
Nowadays, of course, I don’t really give a shit about being called a bigot, because it’s clear that not a lot of people have ever touched a dictionary in their lives.
I was amazed at the reaction from my would-be detractors when I responded that “Ok, so I’m a racist|sexist|bigot then.” It was like seeing any of the power they thought they might have had disappear in a second.
Labels mean everything to these assholes… take that away from them and they go apeshit.
And if any of these pieces of shit come near MY children… I will cure their pedophilia, permanently.
They expect you to be shamed and silence yourself. They don’t known what to do when you just agree with them.
Damn straight.
US director Stanley Kubrick shows this in his film Eyes Wide Shut. He made it look like a film about sex and infidelity but the subtext and subliminal message was mostly about pedo rings and secret satanic cults amongst the elites. He left Hollywood early on and settled in the English countryside. He lived there with his family most of the time as a recluse. Maybe he’d seen things he wished to stay away from. This short documentary is in French but subtitled, it analyses the film in a way i never looked at it before. It’s pretty credible and astonishing stuff. I apologise for the video link, i know they are pretty big.
Several years ago, Roman Polanski was detained in Switzerland since he had an Interpol arrest warrant outstanding for raping a 13 year old girl.. What amazed me was how the “arts” community defended and supported him, most notably Woody Alan.
What a coincidence that he happened to die as soon as the film was finished….
Normal, heterosexual, monogamous human relationships are soon going to be in the minority if these sick fucks get their way. I can’t even imagine having a daughter in the future Western sexual climate. The girls I meet today are far too sexualized and this is probably just the tip of the iceberg. Even alpha fathers don’t stand a chance against the programming here. Makes me want to move to the mountains in Austria or Switzerland and start a family. Anywhere that hasn’t been infected by liberalism.
Don`t even think of it. Nowhere saw as many cases of incest and child abuse as there, in the Alps… Heidi`s grandfather`s penchant was obviously not only reserved for his goats….
Didn’t know that. Maybe Spain or Portugal. Somewhere that still maintains traditional gender roles.
Much better. Rural Spain, Balearic Islands. Normal people with normal sexual dimorphism and traditional values there.
Lots of like minded folks moving to cz and hungary
Not getting angry about things that are out of your control are difficult, but I’m trying…
There is no doubt that pedophilia is truly a pathological sexual affinity, and when acted out, one of the most devastating, injurious behaviours, affecting the victims of it. However- when the pathological impulse is NOT acted upon – it is no crime. There was a therapy program in Berlin`s Charité Hospital 10 years ago, which adressed exactly that issue – allowing individuals who recognized the pathological urges within themselves, to check in, all in order to get the psychiatric help, they DID feel they needed – thus not becoming monsters, and not being (justifiably) strung up by the society.
As for the pathology itself – the act is moreover the same, but ethiology may differ in different people…
For instance:
1. Fixed pedophile – gets aroused EXCLUSIVELY by children;
2. Regressive pedophile – opportunist – reverses to the pathological affinity when stressed – and then yo-yo-es to normal sexuality, when stress passes
3. Associal pedophile (personality disorder) – doesn`t care WHO he abuses;
4. Sadistic pedophile (many women among them…) – loves to cause pain, but “prefer children”…..etc., etc.
It is a complex problem…and yes, man-eating tigers are among us. The humane question is: extinction (virtually impossible…it is recurrent in the population, and we do not know all the causes…) or “Zoo`s “?…
p.s. …Castration, chemical or otherwise, is a BAD idea in most cases; limp-dicked psychopaths quickly learn that stiff, sharp objects can penetrate, as well….see the story of A. Chikatilo….
“King Pin”:
Where did you source this useful taxonomy of pedophilia?
> 4. Sadistic pedophile (many women among them…) –
> loves to cause pain, but “prefer children”…..etc., etc.
This one looks awfully implausible. I have read in THE NEW YORK TIMES that there are no true female sadists, and so all dominatrixes are just actresses working for pay. But there are women who are sadistic towards *children*?
Now, the U.S. Secret Service guarded the Obama girls more closely when they were little than my children were guarded at the same ages, but not a *lot*. I have read that the children at risk are those from lower-resource families–I made sure that my kids were outnumbered by caregivers 3-to-1.
I sourced the data from my line of work…use it daily…and might just publish it some time in the future.
I have encountered and talked to more serial killers, cannibals and child molesters then I can even remember…more than whoever wrote that drivel in NYT.
What stands out in my memory is a case of a nurse in Eastern Germany, left by her husband with a young daughter, for being “too perverse”…and then filling her free time with luring girls aged 7-11 at the local supermarket, pretending to need help with carrying the groceries. After dragging them to her house, just like a proverbial witch, she proceeded with tying them up, shaving their hair and eyebrows, and then….torturing them for 2-3 days with burning cigarette butts, sticking small needles under their nails…and then finally, suffocating them while masturbating, by rubbing her bloody vulva (yep, the rage came with the period…) on their faces. All while her 2-year-old daughter peacefully slept in the other room.
…or a mother who repeatedly finger- , pencil-, and tootbrush-raped her preteen daughters, because “it is good for them and it will spare them lot of pain and it is what all good mothers do”.
Etc., etc.
Sadistic female sexual offenders seem to hate themselves a lot….yet fail to exert “the revenge” on themselves (…yeah ..because it HURTS a lot, presumably..), and then project all that loathing on helpless, younger “simulacra” of themselves.
Remember, Society DOESN`T WANT to “blemish” the idealistic picture of woman as “Mother”…an allegory of “Nurturing On Two Legs”…perfectly protective and forgiving.
Religions profit from that false image since time immemorial.
Yet, women are bloody under the skin as all humans are. And prone to same vileness, as well.
Recommended reading:
Sex Offenders: A Criminal Career Approach, by Arjan A. J. Blokland, Patrick Lussier
and
Female sexual offenders by Gannon & Cortoni….for starters…. ;))
p.s. Children of lower social status are MORE VULNERABLE…but “higher echelons” of adults are equally perverse.
ALWAYS film the person babysitting Your children.
You never know.
“You’re a [insert taboo name here meant to silence you]!”
Yeah, I am, proud of it too, so fuck you. Now what are you going to do, Mr. Leftist? Your power just vanished.
It’s the best defense. Own it…and there is no where left to go.
You’re a racist (because I believe in Trump doing things to make America a priority again…make it first versus last).
Then I’m a racist (doesn’t make sense..but so be it).
I’m going to reveal something personal:
My baby sitter got to me when I was 5. Anything sexual between an adult and a child is doing damage and that damage manifests itself in many ways throughout that persons life. That child may grow up to be smart and ok but that sinful feeling of violation robs the child from feeling normal in several parts of life.
Justifying pedophelia is a taboo that should never be crossed. An adults job is to protect the child, give them a stable life and help them develope into a complete person, but you’re not doing that when you’re engaging in sexual acts–you’re doing damage to them like drugs do to the body.
Sin is upon sinners, not upon victims.
I’m amazed how common it is. Several girls I’ve been with confided in me they had been molested as children, usually by family members. Sorry to hear you went through that, and it is a line that should never be crossed.
Lena Dunham admitted doing it to her little sister in her memoir and the media didn’t even condemn her. She should be locked up as far as I’m concerned.
That’s too kind of a punishment.
Remember she’s moving to Canada if Trump wins.
Damn right. Let a man say that in a book and he would have been jailed. It’s the pussy pass that is given in our society, today, through the courts and the media.
A man would have never lived it down. For Dunham, she’s a sick individual who needs counseling but society and the media will just ignore it.
How many women say that just for pity and attention though?
A lot, based on what I know about women.
It just goes to show that sexual depravity was well under way in western society before all these debacles.
Sexual sins became trendy and acceptable with Henry VIII needed to make a new Christian religion based on his desire for a younger woman, as well as Martin Luther who ran into convents to deflower nuns. Didn’t anyone think that men who thought with their dicks may have not had a case for claiming to know what true Christianity was about?
The amount of Anglicans and Englishmen that have told me “Yeah, it’s funny Henry made a religion so he could divorce” astounds me. The apathy is gut-wrenching.
EDIT: Sorry for jumping on the soap box so soon. Condolences for the damages the other person caused you as a child. I hope we all work to weed out evil acts in this world
I read a very level headed article years ago by a therapist with several of his subjects. Basically it stated that society views pedophiles as the absolute worst. Once people in prison find out someone’s a pedophile they’ll eat them up: piss in their cell, rape them, beat them to a pulp and the guards do nothing. They’re the absolute worst on the crime totem pole in the eyes of everyone and treated as such.
1. He saw pedophilia as a sexual preference of sorts and as David DeAngelo said “Attraction is not a choice”. They cannot control it their desire, they can only choose not to pursue it. I’d imagine most pedophiles know damn well what everyone thinks of them.
2. I have not read the article of this guy, but pedophiles who do not act on their desires are not heroes or anything commendable. Maybe his tone is more “this is what I have to go through, this is what I deal with and Im bearing it all.” Either way pedophilia is and should always be taboo and any person, male or female, should seek therapy do deal with.
3. If it is a desire that cannot be curbed (imagine a world where heterosexuality is illegal, though we are moving there), and the sexual desire is almost impossible to stop for both genders regardless of trauma, there should be an outlet for pedophiles. Perhaps “Virtual child porn” where the content is an artist rendition, animated or 3D, just no real children. You may think this is blasphemy or that I have some sort of Stockholm syndrome, but Im trying to keep people with these desires away from kids and at this moment thats my tentative conclusion.
4. Any pedophile caught should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
People have trauma and bad things happen all the time in their life and its almost unavoidable that everyone grows up being angry or bitter about something no matter our privilege. I think thats part of human nature. But sexual contact between an adult and a child is something that should not happen no matter what.
Finally, to address what you said: Men in power are always going to form harems of young girls and young fertile women will flock to those men and the parents of those women will encourage it. Laws and civilization aside I draw the line at pubescence.
I’m Catholic and find your remarks highly helpful regarding the evil of the founders of Protestantism.
I hope you find some justice. That is not right.
Disturbing truths here I am sorry to say and we really need to not just start speaking out against this filth but push back like is happening against transdegenerates in Washington when legislation containing language protecting them got chucked despite an earlier cave by forty three ‘moderate’ republicans.
This article by Relampago, the article Roosh put a link to on the comment below and others like this help to shed light on these issues of degeneracy. They help to wake people up, but out of the many men who are awake is there anybody doing something organized in response to all of this. Here I sit with my blood boiling reading this crap, I’m not capable enough to organize anything, is there anywhere a man can go to at least be able to feel like he’s helping to inch away from this rot.
Okay, then, if hating child abusers makes me a “pedophilophobe” or whatever the buzz word will be, I’m fine with that. Yes, I am bigoted against child rapists and proud of this fact.
ANY father is justified if and when eliminating threat from it`s progeny`s life….However, it is important that “Look! Pedophile!” doesn`t become another “Look! Rape!”, “Look! Witch!”, “Look, Communist!”, etc.
Pitchforks and torches gather fast….the bigger the mob, less brains it has…and those who are first to cry “witch!” may not always have the purest motivations…
Reading sites like ROK, Amerika.org, is starting to feel repetitive. I get it already, this thing is crumbling. I already take care to feed my body and my mind with healthy things. What little I can control I do control to best of my abilities. There comes a point where to be able to control something greater you need more minds, more able hands to help.
This is what I have been warning LGBT supporters years ago. I was laughed at but who’s laughing now? I now have all the proof I need that gay rights was a mistake.
I said that too and was killed as u were
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uvv5IBo7dpQ
“Chuck Fickens”, lol that’s fantastic man.
The marginalization of heterosexuality continues with a newly invented term “stare rape”
Yeah, guys are just falling all over themselves to stare at that marginal 6.
I suspect she’s projecting her own fantasy because sadly nobody really stares at her at all. Poor little dear.
Always the case. She is forcing the eyes on her because no one (of value) willingly does so.
Hey now! I’ll have you know I was stare-raped by a marginal 6 at Logan’s the other night and it was unsettling. I have no doubt she was fantasizing about me tying her down and having my way with her. I was fantasizing that she would go away and leave me to my beer.
Stare Rape: Rape that truly matters.
You should file a police report and get a Stare Rape Kit done asap!
I would have… but I instead chose to post it on social media and have an interview with Time magazine.
I have yet to meet the woman who doesn’t want to be stared at. By everyone. Even the “yucky” men. For women, it’s like collecting likes on FB.
If you don’t think this is the truth, ask yourself why they wear the clothes they do and go to the efforts they go to in order to dress themselves up with makeup, hairstyling, etc… People who want to be invisible engage in the exact opposite course of conduct.
They want stares and attention. It’s the whole point of fashion. And, they also want the power to publicly reject those they deem unfit. So we get “stare rape.”
“He wants me so bad he’s practically raping me with his eyes, but he’s below me, and I want nothing to do with him. HE’S UNWANTED!”
Sure, sweetheart. Maybe you don’t want sex with him, but without his stares, you don’t get to stand on your soapbox and scream “look at me (more than you already are)!”
I love their canned response when you ask “So why did you dress pretty like that if you didn’t want me to look?”
“Because I do it for ME ME ME ME ME ME ME! I don’t dress for men, I do it for ME ME ME ME ME ME!”
Yeah toots, you do it for yourself. That ego boost when men look at you justifies it all. But you’re not smart enough to make the connection and think “it’s just for me!” Sure babe. Sure.
That response never made sense to me. It’s one of those times to play the “why?” game:
Why do you dress sexy?
I do it for me.
Why?
Because I like to look sexy.
Why?
It makes me feel good.
Why?
Because…..people notice me.
Bam!
“But he’s below me”.
TRANSLATION: He doesn’t have enough socio-political-economic resources for me to plunder and thus deem him “worthy”.
Case closed.
“I don’t wear these spandex shorts that practically have the bottom of my ass hanging out to the grocery store for anybody to leer at me unless I cherry pick them to stare myself!” There ya go.
Never once had a female complain when complementing her colors.
Usually a nice long look and a lean foward with a complement is A game.
It the same reason that they wear push-up bras, low-cut blouses or tight sweaters, short skirts, and high heels, and then complain that men stare at them.
Wanna p*ss them off REAL good? Refuse to play their stupid little games and IGNORE them.
Bingo.
My thoughts exactly.
There has got to be way finer pieces of ass to stare at than her
And they always flip-reverse the psychology to make men seem like the “assholes” for not wanting them to gratify their egos. Entitled fat cunts acting like they somehow deserve top-tier men. It doesn’t even pass for a bad joke!
That level of narcissism is amazing isn’t it? I almost sneer outright when an ugly-fatty tries to flirt with me. I had one sit down next to me in a bar. She *could* have been pretty if she’d been a healthy weight, but instead was a porker and was “accentuating” her big tits (that came from being fat) and trying to coo over me. When it came out in the clear that she was openly flirting with me I got up, excused myself, took my drink then sat down next to the prettiest looking normal girl I could find in the place and started chatting her up. Pissed Porkie *right* the fuck off and she stomped out of the bar indignantly.
As if somehow, she had any chance of rating a man like me. The mind boggles at that level of entitlement.
And what the fuck are they always so fucking loud for?? Seriously! The fat bitch is ALWAYS the one and only voice obnoxiously drowning out everything else in the room, including the music! I mean, I get that they have not a goddamn thing to offer the universe ever and have to resort to being loud and lewd to get noticed anytime anywhere, but for the love of fuck, curtail that shit! Because what do I specifically do? I say “It’s always gotta be the fat one!” in these scenarios, loud enough for those around me to hear!
Don’t underestimate the level of entitlement that the typical Western female porker has. In her delusional mind, she’s a 10 and ANY man should be glad that she notices him!
More accurately maybe, they’re sick of 100 pound dweebs peeping over their Ipad screens and are sulking it’s not the hulkish, bad ass MMA enthusiast eyeing her up.
Their double standards are fucking bottomless
That’s likely true. No woman I laser eye ever does anything but smile. But “Jody” Hipster? Doubt she wants him to even notice her.
Hollywood and the elites in general live in their world out of touch from the masses. The elites can indulge in vices no normal man can do. In the discussion about Satanic rituals and child abuse in Hollywood in the forums, it was mention that general population is starting to notice something is wrong with child actors in Hollywood. General population is deem stupid in the eyes of elites, but fail to realize the humans a hardwired to notice patterns and have innate morality when it comes to protecting offspring.
The problem with this push for pedophilia, it will backfire as the MSM continue to push for the narrative that is divorce from reality. There previous attempts were issues that people can accept adults being freaks, but having children a prime target for sex goes against that innate morality. There is going to be reaction to this push, but I can not imagine what it will be.
I just read about Corey Feldman and Elijah Wood talking about pedophilia in Hollywood. Feldman was molested as a child, Wood wasn’t, but said that it was fucked up that it was still going on in Hollywood.
Makes you wonder if these elites are helping to push for pedo-acceptance because they’re afraid their crimes are going to be brought to the light.
Or makes it easier for them to indulge variety. The best bet is take down names and wait for the moment when the elites loss power. That be the only way to get justice for the children and avoid ‘accidents’.
Yep i knew once Transgenders became accepted, pedophiles would of been next, beastiality will soon come as well
The real question is who will beat out who? I personally think beastiality might beat pedophilia…not that it matters who wins. In the end, we lose either way.
Oh definitely because its not illegal already in 14 states(Alabama, Hawaii, Kentucky, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming)
Wow, didn’t realize that many states allowed beastiality…Texas, Alabama, and Kentucky? Seriously? Glad my state isn’t on that list yet.
That’s kind of a misrepresentation, although not an intentional one. We *used* to work on the notion that one didn’t need to make every single little thing “legal” or “illegal” specifically in lawyer code. Generally it was assumed (rightly at the time) that morals and social norms kept that kind of thing in check. Hence if you lived in a heavily Christian area, you didn’t need to specify in the law that women could not go topless in public, rather, you assumed that society in general would keep that in check. I bring that particular thing up because there is no law in Ohio specifying that this specific activity is illegal, yet we don’t have thousands of topless women roaming around (and, well, that’s good, especially in southern Ohio where you’d rather they wore as much clothing as possible to cover the ugly).
Ok, that makes me feel better. I was starting to feel a little surrounded here.
True GoJ but i think they may want to get on that soon in those states as people would be able go say there is no law against it right?
It’s what we’ve come to, isn’t it? Sadly.
Legal or not, if some deviant lays a hand on one of my daughters, I will be going to jail and they’ll be headed to either the hospital or the morgue.
Morgue. Never leave anybody in a state that they can talk to a lawyer. Just something I heard from a cop regarding self defense. I expect it would apply to your situation as well.
Indeed; defending my family falls under self-defense, I’m sure. My first option would be the morgue, but the hospital would be the very least they’d face from me and I’d make sure to break every bone in their hands as well as their face.
“I’d make sure to break every bone in their hands as well as their face.”
What makes you so sure that YOU wouldn’t be the one who got the worse of the confrontation?
Because somebody who molests children generally would have to be a weakingly to begin with. Besides, he trains in martial arts (Unabashed).
Most individuals don’t have training in 4 martial arts and over a decades worth of full-contact sparring experience. I’m willing to take my chances. And all that is before you factor in the unfathomable rage of a father who catches someone molesting his child.
Leave no trace of the body. Cremate them if possible.
“Wood chippers are cheaper than lawyers… if you gotta do what you gotta do, do it right and be done with it.”
quote from a poster on shotgunworld
I heard pigs will eat a full-grown man in a matter of minutes.
I hear boating in the Atlantic is lovely year round.
I bet.
Exactly. Don’t fuck with us boat guys.
You got to starve the pigs for a few days, then the sight of a chopped-up body will look like curry to a pisshead. You gotta shave the heads of your victims, and pull the teeth out for the sake of the piggies’ digestion. You could do this afterwards, of course, but you don’t want to go sievin’ through pig shit, now do you? They will go through bone like butter. You need at least sixteen pigs to finish the job in one sitting, so be wary of any man who keeps a pig farm. They will go through a body that weighs 200 pounds in about eight minutes. That means that a single pig can consume two pounds of uncooked flesh every minute. Hence the expression, ‘as greedy as a pig’.
It’s a little disturbing you know this in that level of detail…
you won’t go to jail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2700872/My-son-saved-attackers-life-Father-pounded-admitted-child-molester-bloody-puddle-claims-son-stopped-stabbing-admitted-pedophile-death.html
Good to know.
Do it right — send the sick pedo f*cks to the morgue.
Well that’s the first option. The breaking of many, crucial bones is only in an extreme circumstance where I am unable to finish the job (like getting pulled off the fucker by 12 policemen).
The war against children began long ago. The use of psychotropic drugs in children is a growing market for Farmafia, like hormone replacement therapies (literally child abuse). But as morally condemn pedophilia if it is legal to kill an unborn child?
Get the fuck outa here , couldn’t even finish that you tube vid . And I never liked that Jared fuck , and this was way before he was found out about is child porn . ” hey look its Jared ” commercials , I fucking hated those
For real. Congrats, you lost weight! You still look like a puny fuck that hasn’t touched a weight in his life and you like to beat your meat to children. Not exactly a role model for even weight loss.
“Jared, do you even lift?”
“Yeah, I pick up chicks.”
“They must be pretty light.”
*Jared grins*
Haha, you really like to tiptoe that fine line don’t ya?
(((((Jared)))))
Every
Fucking
Time
Jared was better off fat. Nothing worse than losing all that weight and realizing you are still ugly af
Whaddaya mean?
Beady eyes, joker smile, NO EARLOBES? What’s not to love, bubbeleh?
And we just had Hussein Obama telling us we all need to “morally evolve”. This must be what he means. That’s not something I would have expected from a father.
All the upheavals against child abuses which fail to recognize and denounce the sexual abuse that is ritual infant genital mutilations in the name of some fantasy god are but a way to keep the useful idiots from looking at the root of the problem and taking care of it.
It’s laughable to see outrage at isolated acts of paedophilia (as much as they are horrific and call for their perpetrators to be brought to justice) when millions of children every day are being genitally abused and tortured by the practice of ritual genital infant mutilation.
Paedophilia and satanic blood rituals practices start with male (and female) ritual infant genital mutilation, that’s what needs to be recognized.
Once that barbaric practice will have been banned worldwide there will be much less violence at all levels, including induced abortions, terrorism, serial killings and all criminal behaviours.
Avoid getting sidetracked.
The truth (and the solution to the problem) is under our nose, literally.
Until the roots are not healed the whole tree will keep being sick.
http://bit.ly/1r0MxcB
While I have similar feelings of circumcision being torturous to infants (to my knowledge, no anesthesia is used), I’m skeptical of the claims about it being linked to all the criminal behaviors and abortions listed above. That’s quite a conclusion to draw there.
So circumcision caused 9/11?
No. But Wile E. Coyote did.
I could see it. He does have a history of explosive ordnance violations.
Right? And ACME is his shell corporation.
The coyote’s only our special desert operative.
This, http://bit.ly/1P1pep9 (Alexithymia and Circumcision Trauma: A Preliminary Investigation) as a starter might help, along with dozens of other studies you might want to read if you are interested in the subject.
Interesting. I might skim it a bit in my downtime. Has there been any studies done on behavioral changes in infants who were given anesthesia before the operation? My thought is it would be much less traumatic.
No difference on the effects with or without anesthesia as, the removal of the foreskin directly induces cortical changes (stunning the growth of certain areas of the brain).
Once that barbaric practice will have been banned worldwide there will be much less violence at all levels, including induced abortions, terrorism, serial killings and all criminal behaviours.
Curious, I was circumcised (didn’t get a say in the matter of course), how is it that I’m not out aborting babies while terrorizing the civilian population? I mean the ones that I don’t serial kill of course.
It is a barbaric practice, agreed, I would like to see it outlawed, personally. But to lay the blame of the world’s crime and violence on circumcision is a bit suspect. Europeans have been mostly uncircumcised and they were quite a violent lot for thousands of years. You can’t walk ten feet through an African Savannah without being raped, and I’m pretty sure they don’t circumcise either.
No nation in Africa is reported to have low rates of circumcision.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_in_Africa
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/88/12/09-072975/en/
And Europe? Land of the uncircumsized?
Also curious about the answer to the rest of my post.
Alex Jones had a recent rant about this subject as well.
If corporations think it’s a good thing that men are using women’s bathrooms, and that you’re a bigot if you disagree (as North Carolina found out), all bets are off.
That also poses the question: Who ARE these people running the corporations?!
Every
Fucking
Time
“If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.
And why can’t more rightists understand that?
I guess the left’s ultimate goal is for every sexual behavior, no matter how deviant, to be normalized? If so, why so much hate for rapists? Surely people who don’t want to be raped are just bigots, right?
If we do indeed return to the sexual jungle, as the article posits, women are in trouble because they don’t possess the physical strength to deny most men their sexual urges.
All sexual behavior EXCEPT straight male sexuality, which is clearly being minimized and nearly outlawed. Everybody else, every deviant and freak, on the other hand, is free to stick their parts wherever they want consequence free.
Person A: I only have sex with male giraffes under 3 years old
Person B: Oh that’s great. I like having sex with girls
Person A: gross
(I assume this conversation is going on right now somewhere)
I have a comic book with various jokes that you just reminded me of. I’ll need to send you one of them when I get home tonight. It’s related to your comment. You’ll get a good chuckle out of it.
Yep. The reality is they will try to push new marraige laws against hetero men. Maintain an age difference limit of 8 years, consider all sex with a woman under the age of 21 as rape, ect.
Redefine childhood and paedophilia upward. See the result.
Motherfucker needs his hands cut off so he can’t type more vile and disgusting bullshit and play “victim” any longer.
And if anyone reading this thread thinks pedophilia doesn’t really exist, I worked with a guy in an academic research lab that killed himself because he was found out to be linked to the underground pedophile trade. He knew it was over after that.
I wont share any more details on here, but if you’re really curious msg me and I could pipeline more info by pm.
Nothing wrong with naming a dead pedophile.
I gotta say, it’s pretty cool this guy killed himself. But it would’ve been much cooler if he’d killed himself before he fucked up some poor kid’s life.
Pedophilia will help us in the end. This is a predominately mgtow/pua zone, and we know it’s women who we despise or are at least angry with.
Women get away with what they do because they monopolize the sexual marketplace. A lot of you love tipping your ancap fedoras, here’s the time to be an economist. If you take away women’s leverage by permitting homosexuality, trannies, and pedophilia… what you have left is a society where women can’t dictate shit. Plenty of places to stick your dick. Loving holes you can groom, control, and won’t ask nearly as much from you.
Gimme my ten year old waifu who wants a Scooby Doo Lunchbox for a wedding band.
Or my retarded harem who… also wants a Scooby Doo lunchbox lol.
Well, no matter what you think of the moral considerations and aside from considerations of legalizing child abuse, he does say that he never has and never will abuse a child. To use the metaphor of the devil, is it not courageous to be constantly tempted and resist anyway?
Given his attention whoring in the public limelight, it wouldn’t surprise me if he actually has molested children and wants to be caught or sussed out.
Maybe. On the other hand, maybe he just tries to find a way to live with himself by having others accept him. Not that that is a very promising prospect. Self-acceptance always comes before acceptance by others.
There’s something twisted and bizarre to me when a person comes out about something like that. It can’t just be on accident. At a *minimum* he’s trying to normalize the behavior and make it seem like he’s a “victim” which is basically what gays did in the 1970’s. Now look where we are.
I understand your sentiment there. I just think that there is a difference between acceptance and submission. You can accept somebody without submitting to their ideas and values or giving up your own values for them. Unfortunately, that is not what is happening. It seems that everybody is keen on submitting to the leftists to prove how accepting they are. That is not the way to go.
Or you could just hang them.
In public.
On live tv.
Just watch the Muslim beheadings. Heh.
The world is sick and upside down… basically my entire upbringing is at odds with everything I see these days…. everyone is so afraid to say “no” or “your wrong” and instead is forced to accept some very disgusting behaviours as normal.. I’m really sick and tired off being told that I have to accept things and I’m not allowed to have my own opinion…Watch “the detour” they make fun of this shit….they even have an episode where a 61 yo guy wants to marry a 16 yo…you cant make this up!!
I predict a day in the future in which it will be a crime to comment or to otherwise badmouth anyone’s lifestyle
Well, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and others just made a pact with the EU to police undefined “hate” speech, removing the offending comments and “educating” the offenders.
So, yeah it’s likely on the near horizon.
Its so orwellian its sick…. its like every dystopian novel I’ve ever read coming true… and its always pushed into existence by people that “think” they are doing good.. and its obvious to me their not!! And my family and friends wonder whats wrong with me…. I tell them its not me… ITS THE WORLD you idiots!!!
It’s as simple as pulling the plug on all those and telling them to suck your dick. I’ve never wasted my time on that idiocy and almost pity the unwashed mongrels that do.
>It’s as simple as pulling the plug on all those and telling them to suck your dick.
This also works well on Tinder.
The best thing that people can do is top using them. Most of it is a waste of time. People need to start living real lives instead of these cooked up, fake ones on Twitter and Facebook.
Creating Hell on Earth
Scratch the surface of any shirt lifting puff & you’ll find a pedo waiting to come out.
This has been a long time coming and the patterns are easy to see. Before the 70’s homosexuality was classified as a mental illness, then they played the fag victim card, then pressure from activists, then public acceptance, same with trannys, now with the nonces
I’m ok with pedos being eternal victims, as I don’t think there is any death that is too brutal for them
sick fucks
This wasn’t supposed to happen. The fags were supposed to be accepted but well closeted and kept far from children. We gave them their rights, their time on the soap box. We pooh-poohed the idea that this would lead to forced acceptance of paedophilia and bestiality.
There were adequate warnings about acceptance of sexual deviancy, but we labeled those people as homophobes who dared to caution us.
The writing is on the wall for everybody to see now. Nobody is hiding this behaviour, rather it’s being promoted. Behaviours once classified as mental disorders are going to be mainstream, as has already happened with homosexuality.
I can’t help but think that this new “paedophile sympathy culture” is really just going to be an enabler for our influx of paedophilic subjects of Mohammed, so they can not only rape without social (and legal) reprisal, they can rape kids.
Don’t be such a paedophobe. Don’t be such a dogfuckeraphobe. Don’t be such a completely sane person in a society that is going nuts.
Being a logicophobe will be a cardinal value at the rate we’re going. This is the kind of shit Caligula would be enjoying…
Here is when you know things have really jumped the shark.
When gay people start to call out others (degenerate) behavior and they start trying to silence or take away the rights of these new (sick) individuals.
As handlers of what they themselves call “humans,” our aim is:
-To make sure the society we created out of the earth-dwelling ape-like individuals we found here keeps being a society made of dumb obedient slave-zombies who simply works and fights for us and for our various factions, pays taxes, consumes, and shuts up.
In order to be able to realize that objective, we:
1. Keep maintaning/reducing IQ levels worldwide through surgical and medical means, indoctrination (education, media, liminal and subliminal influences) and by feeding “humans” chemicals through water and food.
2. Reward “humans” by legitimizing their modified animal instincts (trough surgical, medical, liminal, subliminal, and chemical influences) and who act out our dictated hedonistic lifestyle by giving them power over other obedient zombies (through access to big money, notoriety, religion, politics, and by elevating their status so that jealous fellow zombies will try to imitate them).
3. Keep feeding modified animal instincts (the principle of pleasure was made short-lived by design) by increasing the variety of stimuli, including advertising of paedophilia and all kinds of deviant behaviour as being pleasurable and desirable to pursue. This phase as well is being supported by the usual surgical and medical means, indoctrination and chemicals being fed to the slaves.
4. Suppress all attempts for the dumb slaves-zombies at experiencing “pleasure” outside our imposed framework and suppress the right of expression for all zombies who seem to disagree with the program. If necessary, when they start to become too popular and “annoying,” we physically remove them.
5. Bask in the auto-erotic sensation of fulfilment and nourishment whenever dumb obedient slaves-zombies fight each other and draw blood, kill or maim their fellow obedient zombies either spontaneously, in pursuance of “pleasure,” or because having been induced into doing it by subliminal, surgical, or chemical influence.
In conclusion, that’s why we can sit back and enjoy countless years of entertainment while being fed and taken care of by an endless stream of useful idiots reproducing themselves for us while being unaware of their role.
Ah, “humanity!” What a wonderful toy to play with. Let them have their petty discussions. They look so funny. And they still think they have the power to change something about their condition! They still do not realize they are being manipulated down to their very DNA… They still do not realize they are nothing but food, just like the chickens they keep in their cages to feed themselves. They sure would not like to see rebels among the chickens. Well, we have gone one step further: we have introduced the rebels we want so that they might feel satisfied even at that level. Funny how they do not realize that no rebel is actually bringing any concreate change. On the other hand, how could they, since we control even their very thoughts…
And who are (((((you)))))?
Pssst…shoosh…are You mad?? Why reveal our work to the primates?…;))
I know that most of them are barely able to read, but still.. ))
The more and more I see deviancy accepted (women seem to be the biggest promoters of the trans-bathroom nonsense) the more I think this will end one of two ways:
1. The West becomes late 5th Century Rome (complete with barbarian invaders).
2. The people who perpetuate evil such as this are sent to the gallows or a firing squad.
Honestly, I don’t know which way this is going to go. I will see it in my lifetime.. either item 1 or item 2. Society is deteriorating so quickly…
Might be a combination of both.
I see Hawaii and Alaska having a food shortage possibly either way.
If you think it’s number two, you’re laughing.
It’s number one. The writing’s been on the wall for at least two decades now.
There have been dramatic turns in the past where what people thought was impossible happened suddenly. If we have a black swan event that causes severe disruption (think of much of the world becoming Venezuela) it is possible for a swing back amid the chaos.
Political correctness exists because it has the force of government behind it. ‘Barbara’ in human resources and her rules on accepting transgenders in the work place won’t matter much when there is blood on the streets. In fact, Barbara will probably be scrambling to hook up with a physically and technically capable man who can provide safety and security.
What will matter will be men who are armed and willing to use violence. SJW types don’t have much in the way of weapons or the balls to use them.
Good news folks : they’ve discovered a bactery that resists all antibiotics and could wipe out all mankind.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dangerous-new-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria-reach-u-s/
Fffack this gay pedo earth.
But remember, the slippery rope is a fallacy often used by conservative bigots.
This reactionary bastard prefers “thin end of the wedge”
Camel’s nose under the tent.
Nothing new.
Damn it, I thought the new SJW item would be veganism, but it looks like the sex thing still goes on. Far more effective to control people, I guess.
I actually couldnt read this. This could be the last straw for me. They will regret pushing me past venting on the internet.
I sure hope somebody picks up that phone because we fucking called it.
Oh yea it’s the JEWWWWWSSSSS.
Progressive Jews are Secular Atheists who are only Jewish when it benefits them.
So many children go missing every year, so many children are sold into sexual slavery, feminists and the media say NOTHING.
1. Making pedophilia cool makes it easier for us to accept Mohammedans and their awesome “culture”
2. It normalises the unlit’s status quo and washes over their diabolical crimes.
3. It allows homosexual pedophiles to finally be able to fuck your sons and not get killed for it.
4. To get into the spheres of power you have to have committed a heinous crime in front of them, like when you enter a gang and you gotta kill some innocent random so as to be down with the crew.
If you want research the concepts loosh, biophotons.
There is a super spike of adrenaline in the blood of young children as they are been terrorised, sodomised and then sacrificed, it is considered the most powerful black arts aphrodisiac, this is an offering to their dark lord.
This is a line in the sand, this CAN NOT be crossed.
I will personally not hesitate to get physical with anyone sanctioning the abuse of children. If I ever saw that POS Nickerson I’d be going to jail that day.
Your ancestors were ready to die for what was right, you can at least go to jail.
NO FUCKING MORE
Expect pedophilia, or “trans-age sexuality” (or some other equally repellent euphemism) to be embraced by feminist Intersectionality sometime soon. Like LGBTs, PoCs and every other “oppressed” person, they will form yet more useful idiots in the Leftist war against the EWCHM (Evil White Cis-het Male).
But when you think about it, of course Leftist/Feminist publications like Salon are falling over themselves in promoting pedophilia acceptance, given the huge number of women finally being caught and convicted of fucking children and minors.
Salon? More like Sodom.
This is some twisted shit. That video… Is this guy on PCP or something? This whole issue is a nonstarter and we should let them make fools of themselves more than they do already. Exactly where are these sick bastards going to be finding these children? Are the government run orphanages and juvenile detention centers going to be turned in bordellos for sick perverts? Or are we going to see old men stalking playgrounds seeking consent from 6 year olds?
Either way this is an absolute non starter since I do not know any men who will accept that their 8 year old had reached a decision to be molested by some pervert. If such a law passes I am buying stock in companies that produce wood-chippers and industrial grade acids cause a whole bunch of bodies are going to need to be rendered unidentifiable.
This article is the worst piece of garbage I’ve ever read. If Relampago were a REAL MAN then he would realise that all men are infact “paedophiles” as they have evolved to be attracted to young teenage girls not 50 year old hags. Someone even made a film asking the question “Are all men paedophiles?”, watch it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xA9lVaqXpQ
Furthermore studies have shown a whopping 1 in 5 men are strongly attracted to children 13 or under (see here: https://www.ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf). If they studied this on 13-17 I bet it’d be over 50% of men.
You make the absurd claim that societies which normalise paedophilia collapse and give no evidence for it. You willfully ignore the fact that PAEDOPHILIA WAS BOTH LEGAL AND NORMAL in most (or all?) countries of the world prior to around 150 years ago! For example, in the US state of Delaware the age of consent used to be 7. In Britain it used to be 12 and infact in Spain and the Netherlands it was 12 until as late as around 1999.
Most importantly it was FEMINISTS who raised the age of consent. For example, in Britain a woman called Josephine Butler – a bitter feminist hag (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephine_Butler) was responsible for raising the age of consent in 1885.
Apparently you’re not familiar with the actual terms being discussed. If you think a 17.5 girl is a baby child and a man who likes her is a pedophile, you’re not properly educated.
A 17.5 year old ‘child’?? LOL!!! My great grandmother was legally married with 2 young children (my grandfather and my Aunt) when she was 16!
You are an IDIOT!
All you’re doing is showing your respect of the bitterly jealous old feminists who would love to see you publicly executed for being a normal heterosexual male, assuming you ARE normal…. That is the same femihags that successfully lobbied for these disgusting laws that ultimately target ALL men.
Watch the movie if you DARE. You might find that you are normal… Or according to the feminists you obviously worship – a paedophile!
Take a deep breath. Read what he wrote again, slowly. Sound out the big words.
A lot to do with media distortion of the word beforehand.
Child soldiery was also LEGAL AND NORMAL for hundreds of years. Are you saying you’d be in favour of your 12 year old son being sent off to war?
Ephebophilia, the correct term is ephebophilia, it is not a disease. It is the attraction to teenage girls ranging 14 to 19. The majority of teenage girls have reached stage 4 or 5 of puberty by 14 even as their bodies are still growing in height and weight. An ephebophile is a man who only finds himself exclusively attracted to girls younger then 20 (or women who look under 20 until their age is stated.) Most men experience ephebophilia, few men are ephebophiles.
Fewer men still yet are going to feel any desire toward a twelve year old. That’s pedophilia. I don’t think all men are attracted to women with an appearance under 16 years of age.
Once upon a time, having sex meant the high likelihood of pregnancy. Even with current laws about sex to prevent it happening, 15 and 16 year olds sometimes experience complication more so then an older woman. Having a baby at 14, 12, and even 7 can lead to internal hemorrhaging, stillbirth, abortion, and tearing during childbirth.
Also, marrying off a very young girl to a much older man is a bit far fetched. It happens, but was not that common. Many were married to either men of the same age or men who were no more then about 10 years older. You had 12 year olds being married to 15 year olds, 15 years olds married to 24 years olds and so forth. Marrying a 7 year old to a 24 year old would get some flack from most the public.
Maybe ‘olde’ Delaware had more then a couple pedophilias in their ranks.
Post-script: By older women, I mean women ranging from 17/19 (depending on which studies) to 24, the best time to have children.
It depends how far into sexual development a 12 year old is, and I would think it would be perfectly natural for a 12 or 13 year old boy to be sexually attracted to a 12 year old girl…
Well, the laws do not prosecute if 12 year olds have sex with 12 or 13 year olds. Generally prosecution only starts once a man turns 16 and even then there’s normally a 3 to 4 year leeway given. That’s a bit different. It is unlikely at 18 that same man will still find a 12 year old attractive.
“Well, the laws do not prosecute if 12 year olds have sex with 12 or 13 year olds. ” Depends on where you are, but where I am they do…
“It is unlikely at 18 that same man will still find a 12 year old attractive.” Agreed. But I think an 18 might find a 13 year old attractive. They have developed breasts and the such at that point…
I heard a story of 2 13yos having sex and the court wanted to slap a Sex Offender charge on the 13yo boy. But idk if they actually did or not.
Yep, typical double standard. It’s complete bullshit, if a 12 year old cannot consent, how can they understand the concept of “consent”? How can have more burden than the other? Oh, its because he is a man…
When I was in the 8th grade some of my female classmates were already sleeping around.
In 6th grade, my best friend was snorting cocaine off her bedroom floor. I asked, “What is that?” “Cocaine, you don’t want to ever do this.” In 8th grade, a friend came to me, highly upset. She had a miscarriage in the elementary school bathroom. At 16, a very close friend confided in me that she had already slept with 17 men. At 17, I knew a young girl, 15, who went to the back room to have sex with two guys to feed her Xanax addiction in exchange.
Your story does not surprise me, the world is a dark place.
Wow where the f*ck do you live?? O.o
I live in the Blue Ridge Mountains.
This article is about people attracted to little kids, medical pedophiles, it is a mental disorder. This movie is mainly about the legal definition of pedophilia, saying all men are attracted to girls under 12+
Obviously its talking about attraction to adolescents rather than actual pedophilia.
Actual pedophilia (attraction to prepubescent children) is what this article is talking about.
All who do anything untoward towards such children must be killed.
Not to mention the scandals of congressmen Mark Foley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_scandal and Robert Bauman
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bauman
“bigot”? For not “supporting” pedo perverts? Put me on that list then. Matter of fact, I will take it one step further. A man or woman who molests a child should be taken out and executed.
I would relish kerb stomping this piece of garbage. Anybody who touches a child in that fashion should be fed to rabid dogs or fired out of a cannon into a brick wall.
Amen.
This could spell the beginning of the end for the regressive left. Acceptance of pedophilia can affect anyone’s child, including the silent majority’s children. And you don’t fuck with the silent majority.
Pedophile acceptance could cause Vermont to form its first lynch mobs.
Keep in mind that normalizing pedophilia is exactly why the left wants to keep legal the practice of underage girls being able to get abortions without their parents’ consent. This is how pedophiles can cover up their crimes.
Pedophilia could get legalized but only on boys because gays and feminists have the ppwer
Seems like the left would run out of sick things for people to fuck.
After kids it’s going to be animals, but then it won’t be enough for people to fuck animals, animals will have to be declared people. So eventually it will lead to freeing our chimpanzee brothers and sisters. And then it will be chimpanzee/human marriage. Then there will be genetic modification so they can have interspecies offspring. Then there will be affirmative action for chimpanzees so they can go to college, which you will have to pay for.
This actually sounds ridiculous, but then again when you look at what’s happening today it doesn’t seem so far fetched. And it’s not like leftists can stop, not when they worship “progress.”
Progressive = humans debasing themselves and thinking they’re enlightened while doing it.
Pedophiles are the scourge of the Earth, and when the left and our government starts fully embracing them, our nation will have reached its point of absolutely no return. Todd is no exception to this rule no matter how “virtuous” he claims to be. Another article I saw, written by someone who researched him in detail, quoted him as saying he would be proudly and openly acting on his urges were it legal; in addition, he has protected the identities of people on his forum who admit to engaging in illegal acts, by deleting their posts and refusing to hand over their IP’s when asked for them by authorities. I don’t believe for one moment that he, or any safe-proclaimed pedo, stays a chaste or decent person.
I think you’re right. I think the sick thing is the “tolerance” trick the left tries to play. First it starts off with “tolerance”, then it’s about “rights,” then it will be trying to normalize it in the culture, through tv shows and such. Then you’re bigot and will lose your job if you think sex between an adult and a child is wrong. Sick culture. Which is why people have to stop this shit right now.
I’m shocked they didn’t interview Jerry Sandusky for his thoughts on the matter.
So sex with a child is going to be okay… but “Stare Rape” is not. Hmmm contradictions anyone?
After reading this article, all of us who value tradition, civilization, and the underpinnings of Western culture, as well as our families and our posterity should be asking ourselves the most fundamental question of our “neomasculine existence”…What are we prepared to do to stop this? It’s a rhetorical question of course; Each one of us will have to figure that answer out on our own.
I used to work in a psych hospital in the mid 90’s. I worked with all kinds of kids who were sexually abused and also so that have abused others. I think they are right, in that pedophilia is a sexual orientation like heterosexuality and homosexuality. Where they are wrong is in trying to act like it’s ok. While heterosexuality and homosexuality don’t inherently hurt anyone, pedophilia does. Just because “they can’t help it,” doesnt mean they should exist. It is an anomaly of hormones and genes, and it should be wiped from the gene pool.
I am absolutely lost for words after reading this. WTF? Pedophilia may well be genetically innate in individuals but so could being a sociopath. That doesn’t make either right or socially acceptable.
It seems like they are resorting to its innate therefore its natural and hence acceptable. A clear case of the naturalistic fallacy in which anything ‘natural’ is the way it should be and tolerated.
But there are many things within our natural world that are absolutely horrific, such as parasites like Acanthamoeba Castellanii that literally eat the eye from the inside. It doesn’t mean we just accept them and leave people to suffer.
Young children have neither the physical, emotional or mental capacity to deal with sex. Sexual behavior whether innate or learned behavior with or around our kids is completely wrong. Period.
The only thing shocking here is that they are using a heterosexual pedo as their poster boy. I would think that the natural tendency of the left would be to further lionize homosexual behavior and attach pedophilia as a natural extension of that proclivity. Then again, they may think that’s too close to the recognizable and unpopular NAMBLA. But who knows – they can always add more pedo soldiers to the propaganda army when needed.
This is one of many, albeit perhaps the most totally reprehensible and disgusting, logical end-states of liberal progressive policy. progressive policy has occurred incrementally. The pathway to pedophilia started with the general relaxing of sexual mores then with homosexualism, which, IS very much tied to pedophilia, period. In the book “after the ball”, which spells out the homosexual agenda its fucking clear as day that they [homosexuals] ultimately want to fuck kids. Sexually libertine means anything goes and sooner or later that will include children, because, after all “anything goes”.
That being said, I agree with another guy below – I do think this will lead to not only a HUGE backlash but it may very well undo the left entirely. Its already happening. The recent push for trannies is too much for too many people. The logic just doesn’t add up. You can say that homosexuals are born that way and therefore unaccountable for their sexuality. Now, I believe that is bullshit and homos are lying to us, but, alas, I can’t read minds. However, a tranny doesn’t pop out of the womb as a male with a dress on. Its far too obvious to too many people that these people are just nuts and a bathroom is where we piss and shit, which requires as much privacy as possible. To argue otherwise is absurd, but then again, to argue that you can become the other sex is equally absurd and I think far too many people simply cannot accept this push. And they aren’t. Thus, we have states telling obama to fuck himself and a success boycott of target. pedophilia will cause a much more extreme reaction.
I do think that communities like ROK and the conservatives need to go on the offensive because I do think the left will attempt to push this. But, we need to be there 1) to fight it down and destroy it for all time but also to 2) show the whole fucking world what liberal progressives truly are. They’re just a bunch of baby fuckers. And that will disgust people and that will show them the truth. Simply put liberal progressivism leads to raping young children. And it does. All these fashionably “liberal” people who are just conformists will barf in their mouth when they finally put these pieces together. We need to help them to it. Moreover there are scores of pedophilia victims that, I suspect, will or at least can be easily coaxed into action to speak vehemently against this.
To “salon”, there is no going back now. You have let it all out. You are sympathetic to pedophiles and think its perfectly okay for a grown man to sodomize a 3 or 5 year old. Has anyone ever see a photo of what a child’s rectum looks like after its sodomized? You’ll want to harm any pedophile in the most awful vicious and unmerciful ways afterwards. And that is why this, imo, will lose. Because we as a people will be forced to choose between a child shitting in a colosocony bag for the rest of their life on top of severe mental damage or being called a “bigot” because we don’t have compassion for pedophiles? Asshole torn out at 3 years old life totally ruined or compassion for a 30, 40, 50 year old who says he is misunderstood because he can’t fuck little kids into being handicapped. Despite how fucked up society is, I think there is enough good people still out there that will choose the right choice.
Todd Nickerson needs to get himself into the fucking oven ASAP.
The lunatics are running the asylum.
Pedophilia is already normalized, or at least desensitized. Every other day female teachers are fucking their 10 year old students and people laugh about it online. Only mothers seem upset, all the young, single men and women just point and laugh
Islam already worships a pedophile.
I watched a YouTube with Alex Jones talking about Hastert. He called the pedophiles running DC and Hollywood “Pot Belly Pedophiles” it cracked me up on top of wanting to beat the S$%t out of them.
You see this really with the basically monthly news reports of Teacher/Student trysts! Surprisingly, Texas has reported more than any state despite having maybe the strictest punishment of any jurisdiction in the country. Hell just last week a hot 27 year old female teacher was charged with having a relationship with a THIRTEEN year old boy! Kids reported seeing him grab the teacher’s butt AT THE SCHOOL! SMH!
Never gonna happen. This move may be a positive for the Nationalist God fearing Americans. Trying to legitimise pedophilia? This simply will not stand and the Left trying to do so makes them look really bad to the Average American, even the Liberal ones. They are flinging proverbial crap on themselves. What’s next after child rape? Necrophilia? Bestiality? Will I be a “bigpt” for thinking these degenerates are sick in the head? I say no and the Left can get stuffed.
Just keep calm and vote Trump.
Good reporting. And that was a good read. Don’t know if y’all saw it but Elijah Wood came out and exposed Hollywood as having a pedophelia ring, a few weeks after Roosh wrote an article about it. Keep up the good work gentlemen. It’s been fun and rewarding to see the evolution of the manosphere into a more comprehensive take on things and lead into a deeper cultural awakening of virtue ethics.
There is a reason why, in a more decent time, we had permanent detention facilities for some forms of mental illness.
I knew legalizing same sex marriage was going to lead to this. I even predicted this before the “Supreme” Court judges said so. What do you expect when four of the judges are Jews!? When the boundary of married mother-father-and children is broken, guess what happens? Every common sense boundary is next. Sex ed for kindergartners? Why? Teach them Spanish or Russian language instead. Why not drop the age of consent lower than what it is right now? After all, I’m just pedophobic.
Did you have to use a picture of Jared the Subway guy? I looked into that and the girl he got put away for paying to fuck in New York hotels was 16, that isn’t pedophilia, just standard feminist demonization of male sexuality. Would have been legal if he hadn’t paid in many states.
All that shit like faked perv messages allegedly from him to some bitter old ex on Dr. Phil never went to court.
Guy who ran his charity was allegedly some kind of CPlord but I never saw evidence Jared was in on that.
In fact wasn’t that CP charge because he had a security camera in his clock to see who was stealing his booze but because the girls lez’d out while stealing his drink the evidence of their crime became a crime to possess?
Actually,the RIGHT AND OTHER OVERLORDS,NOT THE LEFT (with of course,notable exceptions) have historically engaged in pedophilia,often keeping young concubines,depending on the perv’s sexual orientation.It was a way for the moneyed classes to control the masses.(There then was a minimal middle class,a state to which the radical right and crypto-fascists want to return the world.)
Society is devolving. Liberals want people to think everything is acceptable, even pedophilia. It is time to expose these animals and beat them to death.
That Jared guy lives not far from me in Zionsville, IN. Hell it was obvious to me when his commercials first came out that he was some kind of degenerate. I’m just suprised it was girls and not little boys he was diddling.
They hypocrisy of our state’s monied elite is there too. When he got rich and a local famous person, the rich neighborhoods wanted him to move in with them. Then the stories started coming out, way before it was in the news. But Indianas rich people don’t care what you are, just as long as you’re rich. Known gangsters and murderers who’re past the $1,000,000 mark in income live out in the open alongside our congressmen and business “leaders.” That’s how it roles.
“I know this much is true: historically, acting out of a sense of moral panic (whether that was communists, witches or drugs) has pretty much always made us less safe because it removes our ability to think.”
Why, for liberals, does this not apply to GUNS too?! Why is it bad to act out of moral panic with witches or drugs or pedophiles, but ok to do the same thing when emotionally calling for gun bans after a terrorist attack!?
I support a special safe place for active pedophiles.
Shallow grave.