Hypocritical Jezebel Feminist Erin Gloria Ryan Thinks Women Are Weak

Erin Gloria Ryan, ‘ferocious’ (lol) feminist writer and middle name flaunting douchette extraordinaire, has released yet another anti-feminism article on Jezebel, that bastion of privileged white women who hate themselves and other females. Seriously, like, check out this other recent article from Erinzo which is dripping with awesome sauce smugness over how a cuter privileged white girl named Axelle Despieglaere was offered a modelling contract but lost it because she took a picture of a hunting trip she went on once. WAY TO GO AXELLE DESPIEG (more like PIG amirite) LAERE! Maybe in the future you’ll learn not to give all the white girls jealous of your looks and joyful nature any ammunition to shoot you with. Isn’t it so feminist when women tear each other apart? Seriously, screw Axelle for daring to be prettier than Erin shooting a moose or w/e she did.



At this point most people of rational thought, regardless of their thoughts on or stance in the sex wars, can agree that the writers of Jezebel are anti-feminist. At the least, they are not the proponents of a feminism which aims to create strong, independent woman. Take for example Erin Ryan’s article about the harassment women receive on Youtube. As EGR so stridently warns her fellow femmes:

Woman-types: ever wondered what it would feel like to be catcalled by men who probably lack the upper body strength to work construction? Then you should start a YouTube series!

Despite the fact that the video hosting giant has featured three popular female vloggers in its recent ad campaign, being a woman who dares show her face on YouTube is a risky move indeed, unless you’ve got skin thicker than that fake dinosaur idiots thought Steven Spielberg murdered.

So what got under Erin’s skin so much? Was some precocious thirteen year old girl’s video on her drawing methods torn apart by paedophiles demanding her to get naked? Was a brave woman’s video of her wearing unflattering clothes in public mocked heartlessly by the patriarchal fashion police? No. She’s angry that beauticians aren’t getting the same reverence and respect as people who post videos about how to change your transmission or how particle physics work.

No matter what women do on YouTube, they can’t really win. Beauty vloggers have bigger audiences, more lucrative endorsement deals, and are somewhat insulated from the sort of ire flung at comedians and commentators and other How-To’ers. But because their main focus is on hair and makeup, they’re sometimes viewed as somehow intellectually inferior to their non-beauty vlog counterparts (according to The Daily Dot, beauty vloggers were excluded from a Women of YouTube panel at this weekend’s VidCon, an event where YouTube’s most watched and subscribed talk about the highs and lows of vlogging).

But no matter the focus of their content, female vloggers who spoke out at VidCon expressed frustration with the nature of abuse that focuses on their physical appearance rather than on the actual content of their videos. If they’re physically attractive, they’re bombarded with creepy requests to do things like slowly put on silk stockings and post the video (ostensibly so some weirdo can fap to it). If they’re not conventionally attractive, male commenters jump on every opportunity to let the woman in question know that she makes their particular boner unhappy and she should go away forever. If she’s of average attractiveness, commenters use the commenting space to have debates about her fuckability.

So commentator’s on women’s videos talk about the woman’s appearance and sexual attractiveness, or conversely they point out their flaws or lack of looks. Even if we ignore the fact that it’s human nature for people to judge one another’s looks (how many games of Kill Fuck Marry has Erin played, I wonder), female content creators do not have a monopoly on rude and hateful comments on Youtube.

A user by the name of Scott Herman has a channel about fitness, and has helped plenty of people (including myself) with their fitness goals. He also has a slightly light sounding voice and prefers to exercise without a shirt on. On almost anyone of his videos you’ll find people calling him gay, calling him a faggot, and telling him to put a shirt on. Almost no user with any amount of video views on Youtube is a stranger to rude comments. In fact, almost anyone who has spent more than a day on the internet has undoubtedly been the subject of hateful comments directed personally at them. It’s just what the internet is. To fight that is to fight human nature. Good luck winning that war.

Erin continues:

Science vlogger Emily Grasslie of The Brain Scoop weighed in after famously smacking down her looks-obsessed male critics in recent months, telling VidCon attendees that she mostly just ignores the trolly mctrolls to avoid risking undermining her credibility.

“I feel like I can’t take [sic] about my image on channel without compromising the value of my educational message,” she explained, going on to detail how people ask her every day about her hairstyle or clothing featured on YouTube instead of the content of her videos. “I have made a conscious decision to never answer those publicly. I’m so afraid that once I start letting in that side of my personality that people will no longer care about the educational message. I think that insecurity is totally a product of the society I grew up in.”

But the fact that women deal with this — still! In 2014! — is an incredible bummer. No matter where we go and what we do and what we say, there’s some guy standing by to shout about whether or not they want to see us naked.

Men deal with it too, but this is Jezebel we’re talking about. They could care less about men, but not that they really care about women either—they only show concern about those women they don’t feel threatened by or whose story fits their self centered narrative. Again, why is Axelle worthy of Erin’s scorn and Emily Graslie is not? Hmm…let’s compare them and try and find out.

erin hates this

Gee, I wonder why Erin likes Emily over Axelle. If the looks of the two were reversed, would Erin still be glad Axelle lost her job opportunity? Going through her article history, it’s obvious Erin’s motto is: ‘I’m a feminist … as long as she’s not prettier than me’. If it was Emily losing the modelling contract because she posed with a dead Gazelle, Erin would be writing an article defending her and probably rant about how it’s so patriarchal to punish women for doing manly things like hunting, and that all those MEN at L’oreal were just threatened by a strong woman.

[On a side note, Emily is pretty passable. If she took those glasses off I’d sure like to lie her down in the grass! MISOGYNY FTW!!!]

In the last of Erin’s short article of outrage, she says:

One of the more irritating aspects of that sort of comment is that the people making them are 100% convinced that the worst thing a man can say to a woman is that he doesn’t want to have sex with her, that the most important thing to a woman is how their weens feel about her. Why else would they wear makeup? Heels? Why would they slather on sunscreen every morning?

Guys, guys, guys. It’s not for you. More often then not, women do it for each other. No one gives a shit about your boner.

I’d imagine that idea, expanded into 4 minute YouTube video form, would likely garner more than its share of rape threats.

Uh huh. Women wear make up, heels and great clothes for each other. That makes 100% sense. Actually, in a way Erin is right about that: women do try and look best because of other women. They do it because they want to make other women feel jealous when they attract a good looking guy by looking like a bangable human being. There’s nothing better for many woman out there than making her ‘sisters’ jealous of the men she gets. Erin is one of them.

For Erin, it doesn’t matter that men get just as and often much worse forms of abuse, or that men often outright lose their jobs for daring to post their opinions (even if it was just retelling a joke from a popular cartoon; in this case South Park) on the internet. Hell, men lose their jobs for having private conversations between each other face to face. Of course Jezebel came out and defended Adria Richards, the woman who helped a man fired because she listened into his private conversation. Which is hilarious in hindsight since the same woman was fired for making sexual comments of her own to a hell of a lot more people. But only women who suffer from other’s hateful remarks matter in Jezebel’s world and, of course, only if the writer perceives them to be uglier than her.

Yet that’s not the main point of this article. What really cheeses me off about Erin Ryan (besides her juvenile attack on a fellow female simply because she’s prettier) is that Erin seems to think women, all women, are fragile little creatures who need to be protected from words. Erin obviously judges others by herself, and Erin is a vindictive thinned skinned hypocrite. Just because Erin, and the other spoiled privileged white women like her, cannot handle criticism doesn’t mean that every other woman cannot. It’s incredibly belittling to other women to say that female content creators on Youtube, and other parts of the web, need to be protected from naughty words. Erin is insinuating that all women are so weak that a half coherent textual message written by a person they’ll never meet left on an internet video created by said woman is enough to harm her.

Is it? Are all women so weak that they need a completely totalitarian system enacted to squash the free speech of others just so they can make a video about applying eye-liner without reading someone basically saying ‘I would have sex with you’? Of course not. Women by and large are not that weak. A good example of a woman who knows just what the internet is all about is internet comedian Jenna Marbles, one of the most subscribed to content creators on Youtube (so much for women being unable to ‘make it’ on Youtube). The amount of vitriol, sexual commentary and general hatred she gets is massive (a fair amount of it from women), and yet somehow she’s still around. Which is great because Jenna loves tearing apart hypocritical feminism like that espoused by Jezebel writers. Jenna is also pretty sexy, so I’m surprised Erin hasn’t tried to rip her apart either.


Female comedy at it’s finest.

Feminists like Erin Ryan are the reason most people don’t take women’s issues seriously, even the few of actual concern. Women are not so weak that some insults on the internet create genuine emotional trauma for them. There are real problems afflicting women, and if it intends to survive as something more than a movement of narcissistic clowns, feminism needs to jettison the privileged white women like Erin Ryan who are running it and get around to solving the real problems.

Women of strength and character are rejecting feminism almost out of hand at this point and it’s not hard to see why when Stopping Bad Men On The Internet Saying Bad Things constitutes a genuine cause for it’s adherents. Most people find it pretty hard to take a movement whose purported aim is to create STRONG INDEPENDENT WOMEN seriously when those who speak for it are driven to near tears because Xx420billynubs69xX said ‘id fuk her holes red’ in a comments section. If feminists are adults, they need to start acting like it.

Read More: Did Jezebel Pick Emma Carmichael For Editor Over A Black Woman Because Of Her Looks?

103 thoughts on “Hypocritical Jezebel Feminist Erin Gloria Ryan Thinks Women Are Weak”

  1. Women understand better than anybody, that control of a conversation and hence control over society, hinges on having firm control over the words used in that conversation. If you can sufficiently shame someone into self-censoring, you’ve won. This is why young “feminists” like Erin Ryan can’t stand it when women who get more attention than her disrupt their attempts at controlling societal conversations about “fairness”.
    It’s all just a transparent power play that denies female nature in an attempt at gaining power over culture.
    The real irony is, every time they try to tighten their fingers on the vocabulary, the more people slip through their fingers, and the less like self-proclaimed “empowered women” they appear to be. Simply put, the more power over society women attempt to gain through impositions of PC language, the more they undermine their own arguments.

    1. The way feminists (and society in general) will try to control you is through F.O.G. – Fear, Obligation, Guilt.

    2. # Jeremy; Excellent comment. Your first sentence is universal. If you can call out a women’s BS with articulation, they will not initially believe what they are hearing. The only recognize things like “your so pretty and smart.” Your second sentence in right on as well. And finally, your last sentence goes to show that when you don’t have moderation or limits and you go too far and loose the potential convert.

    3. Why all these articles on particular feminists?
      We all know that they are stupid, there is no need to keep posting examples. That is like saying that children are not suited for rocket science, and making half of the articles on your website about particular instances where children could not do rocket science.

      1. Because as I mentioned on another thread, these issues are the canary in the coalmine.
        These are the ‘tells’ of the creaking fault lines that are embedded into the very fabric of feminism. The fault lines were there from the start because it is an ideology built on lies and deceit. It’s success is rooted not in it’s substance (because it has none), but in it’s ability to deceive.
        And the first signs of it’s serious implosion are likely to show up as cracks in that deception.
        That is where the value in these articles lies – not so much in the story they tell, but in the trend they reveal.

      2. Review. Repeat. Remind. Build google’able content.
        Want to build mindshare and counter propaganda? Then that’s how you do it. That’s why these kind of articles are here.
        I think your advice might come straight from jizzibel…

      3. So that when anybody uses google or a search engine on this feminist’s name, they find out exactly who they are dealing with.

      4. This is the high priestess of jezebel, a 25yo elevated to a position above all the old fat ugly cat ladies that deserved it more.

      5. because they are influencing an entire young generation and misguiding them to a definition of feminism that is completely self absorbed and concerned with controlling the lives others, including men and women alike. these fucking cunts are the ones accusing men of rape based off of rumors and ensuring they will never get a fair trial due to their kangaroo cunt court activities online. that is how you propagate rape, not fight it.

    4. You have to create a word, a label, that immediately discredits anything your critics say. Back when the Catholic Church had all the power that word was “heretic” or “blasphemer.” Once labeled, you were instantly discredited regardless of how valid or rational your arguments are, and often times shunned out of the society that they control. This is still done today. For feminists that word used to be “chauvinist” and now it’s “misogynist.” When it comes to race relations that word is “racist.” In fact, they’ve done such a good job making “racist” a terrible label that they use it for things that aren’t even related to race, such as opposition to muslims in Europe. Of course, muslims aren’t a race, they’re a religion.

      1. Its probably more accurate to say that the meaning of the word “racist” has been corrupted rather than its purpose for creation initially being used to discredit someone. For example, you can now be called a racist for talking about Germans even though the Germans are not a race. Likewise the term “liberal” has now been so corrupted that today it means the opposite of its original meaning. The same thing is happening to the term “libertarian”.
        George Orwell wrote in depth in this corruption of the meaning of words being used to support regimes.

    5. “Woman-types: ever wondered what it would feel like to be catcalled by men who probably LACK THE UPPER BODY STRENGTH to work construction?”
      We all know that it’s only sexual harassment when it’s done by the ‘wrong type’ of guy but to hear it directly from a feminist!
      Freudian slips like these need to be archived.

  2. That Jenna Marbles video legitimately made me happy to hear. I wanna put on a ring that girl just for this video.

    1. I’ve seen your comments for a year or so now, but this is the first one I’m going to take action on and try for myself 😀

        1. Of course I do.
          And she goes nuts should a good-looking woman at the market check me out or show me her tits.
          She will often recall some instance where a gal proffered her tits at me, such as a lovely viet gal in Saigon who spoke with an Australian accent. She will say “Elmer” in an Australian accent while we are making love.

        2. You liar! My wife would not appreciate such comments, and I talk dirty to her and she likes it. She has insecurities! Not recommended, Mr. Trolle

    2. That makes sense. Fits in with mainstream songs always saying “you’re the baddest bitch in the room.” It’s ego feeding.

      1. It’s women’s inhumanity to women.
        Salon had some essay about domestic violence featuring some brave photographer’s contrived stock photos. I commented “Don’t blame men for this as women concocted it. It’s women exploiting women.”
        Banned and deleted.

  3. The angriest, most strident, and most patently ridiculous ‘social justice warriors’ are in fact spoiled, privileged, UMC western white women.
    Which is to say – the particular demographic of people who are objectively the most fortunate in this culture, in this day and age, in this part of the world – those are the ones yelling and shrieking the loudest about phantom injustices perpetrated against them.
    Let’s consider the totality of their ‘grievances’ and core arguments. I call: projection.

  4. So Axelle Despiegelaere is an avid hunter, who thinks hunting is much more than life and death! Hmmm, don’t know what to make of that girl ….

    1. Give me a woman that I can take what I hunted to and let me rest while she cleans and cooks the thing, making bacon from the ribs (if porcine) and jerky from the rump cuts.
      Frankly I care little for those that want to go on the hunt. Sure it might be exciting and I have actually put my own time into some of the state wildlife funded “outdoors women” programs (Being a firearms instructor) so the act of an individual woman wanting to go hunting I’m not against. But in my own preferences I would prefer, if to be the Mighty Hunter, to have the Great Lady of the household who can pick up an AR-15 and defend the place when I’m gone one the one hand, but skin that buck or hog when I bring it home.
      And no, not “barefoot” in the kitchen either. She’d be in heels.
      (seriously, ever skin a buck indoors on a hardwood or linoleum floor with the wrong soles? You’d wish you had something to prevent you from slipping)

    1. Just more proof that anesthesiologists have one of the greatest jobs in the world. Stand up comedy must seem boring to such people.

    2. Helmuth, for a second there I thought your reply as just blank space…which would have been good too.
      +1 FTW!

  5. There is video of Emily Graslie(glasses) Skinning a wolf .
    The comments on youtube being essentially anonymous could be written by women, the most spiteful comments usually are.

  6. Being a feminist must be like looking for offense all day long. These women are so hateful toward pretty or classically feminine girls that they will cut off their nose to spite their face. In 2005 cheerleaders from div 1a schools were trying to get scholarships and protection under title 9, feminists were no where to be found. Bryant Gumble was doing the story on Real Sports and went to a prominent feminist organization to ask why the lack of support and you could tell by the woman’s reaction she had nothing but hate for woman doing something feminine. Feminist will not help any woman unless she is fat, ugly, a rape victim, or suffering in a third world country. Even then all they get is a hashtag # fatacceptance. The truth is attractive women need feminism like Bill Gates needs and EBT card so feminist resent the attractive women. That is ok because if you are an attractive woman fuck those feminists, I am here for your attractive ass.

    1. The funny thing was when Heimdal was played by a black the Odinists in Europe said “I think you have a translation error, Heimdal having a dirty backside meant he is gay not black” Thor is still a god to some people.

  7. Exposing the hypocrisy of feminism. Take 1 billion. When are they gonna start wearing armbands and ship all the mussagynisssts to concentration camps?

  8. This girl’s penchant for hunting will only elevate her status among men. The cancellation of the L’Oreal contract is a drop of water compared to the rainstorm of offers coming her way.

  9. If you can’t stand the heat, Dear, get back in the kitchen . . . and make me some pie!

  10. These internet feminists have as much credibility as any YouTube troll. It shows to some extent the rigged system. The YouTube troll is relegated to the basement in a state of permanent neckbeardery. The internet feminist, made of the same stuff when all is said and done, gets an office, prestige at speaking in these “talks” (like it was some big fucking deal or something), and even a paycheck.
    All this will mean nothing someday.

    1. The YouTube troll is relegated to the basement in a state of permanent neckbeardery.

      I am so stealing that one. Pure gold!

  11. Feminism is women belittling other women? But ROK is crowded with men belittling other men – hating on the betas, the manginas, neckbeards, gays and white knights etc etc. Hypocrisy much?

    1. ROK doesn’t complain about men that attract women. Quite the opposite. It provides a forum for self-improvement. Improvements which are usually well-received by women of the opposite sex. And even if it isn’t, it is promoting individuals and empowering them by achieving goals and accepting challenges. How is that not a worthy cause?

      1. Indeed. You would be surprised at the positive reactions given out to robust manospherians by many members of the gentler sex. Women can viscerally sense when a guy has gone redpill (in a beneficial way) and instinctively appreciate his no-nonsense balls to the wall understanding and vigorous take on life in all its messy glory. It is the browbeat servile doormat that they are in fact profoundly repulsed by but will not always show this in public so as not to upset the frame of polite company.

    2. I am going to risk the ban-hammer here and assume you were born with – and retain – a penis.
      A tenet of red-pill thinking is that all men are NOT born equal. Indeed throughout all of human history genetics proves that less than half (49%) of men in any generation reproduced. Some men are – unfortunately – born to be losers. They are mocked.
      And rightly so – for in mocking them we awaken those who ARE worthy. The ones who can succeed, win, produce, advance. The ones that feminism has tried to crush. The ones that do not currently even understand their potential.
      I’m sure it is not by accident that this site’s tagline is; ‘for masculine men’.
      IMO this site seeks to save those that want to be saved – not everyone. Feminism, of all things, should have taught us that equalism is toxic.
      It’s not hypocracy – it’s realism. Red pill men had no business designing the way the world works. But we sure as hell make it our business to understand it.
      So should you.

      1. Thanks for your consideration of my penis, Cadders. I would guess I would fall under the mangina category in the imaginative ROK inventory of male losers. Strangely, I discovered as I reached my twenties that many women actually like intelligent, passionate men who like poetry, photography, the natural world… so I can endure your ROK contempt, I shan’t be making a return visit.

        1. So you are capable of tolerance but refuse to return as you apologetically point out hypocrisy and hypocracy?
          Run boy.

        2. if you read the site you would realize that a girl “liking” you doesn’t mean a damn thing. If she doesn’t respect the MAN you are then she is not your girl, no matter how much she says she is. There are millions of women in relationships with guys they like while waiting for a strong, dominant man (in mind and body) to come along and give her the leadership her true feminine nature demands.
          If you go out in the world with the poetry and photography stuff, you’re going to give your betaness away from the jump. There’s nothing wrong with liking them, but understand that in America it doesn’t get girls wet and that’s all that matters these days. Don’t be surprised when you catch her with the drummer because of his “I dont give a fuck” vibe.
          ..and if you do, we’ll be right here to tell you what you did wrong and help you become a better man. We’re not your enemy.

    3. We are forthright about our disdain for manginas and white knights. These are delusional cowards who hate themselves and bring down other people.
      I doubt anyone here hates neckbeards, gays, or betas. These are simply other men who have not achieved alpha status in their current domain… No hate required. Many betas are actually courageous and good natured… This site promotes alpha status however as the current culture offers nothing substantial to your average beta male.

    4. I would have to agree with you. Rather than devote the time to truly improve themselves, the men of ROK spend all of their time belittling betas, gays, women, and anyone who does not identify as an alpha. To do so gives them a false sense of being high quality individuals.
      If you read blogs on this website often enough, you notice a theme closely related to their criticism of extreme feminists. The disillusioned sense of self. The “I’m intelligent, I’m cultured, I’m high quality, I’m manly.” is analogous to the women who tell themselves how “pretty, and wanted” they are.
      I actually find the men of ROK to have more similarities with (their view of) feminist behavior than most people.
      It is my belief that the red pill lifestyle is a reactive movement. Men who are reactive, not proactive, are not high achievers. You will see countless blogs here about betas coming to the realization that red pill is the way to go. Yet, this decision usually comes after being scorned by a female. You see ROK regarded as a “safe place” for these men. That is what reactive men do, they retreat. The truth is, a real alpha man would care little for a safe place. He would speak his mind anywhere and everywhere he wanted.
      Much like the feminists they criticize, they are never wrong. They are far superior in intellect. They are cunning. They are, “the few” that understand the world.
      The men here complain about the lack of quality women in the west, yet they frequent old, run down bars in search of the easiest conquest. It’s like fishing in the toilet bowl all day and being shocked that all you’re getting is turds.
      I hate to disappoint you, Orlando. If you were looking for a blog that was truly about self improvement (like I was), you’re in the wrong place. I guess I will remain a so-called “beta.” A week on this site and I find it to be a disappointment.

      1. I don’t like the quality of articles lately either and I agree with you that there are more betas and arm-chair alphas then real alphas proving themselves and video taping their prowess with women or photos of their faces and suits. I wouldn’t want to be a target of feminist scorn or a beta showcase so I don’t show my face but I think it’s time that our “anonymous” writers start to be more like Roosh and give some credibility. I have doubts about everyone and how much they are sleeping with as I come from a hedonistic financial background and I think Roosh and McQueen are more interested in making money and being important than actually being alpha and telling the truth. I think there are a lot of exaggerations in a lot of stories.

        1. You do realize this place is used by a lot of people simply to vent, right? Add to that a healthy dose of trolls and agitators and what have you got… A lovely mess down in the c-section. I agree though that some of the articles here leave much to be desired, but what can we do. It’s a bit like a Turkish bazaar where you will find something for everybody. Even a severed monkey’s paw granting cursed wishes if you look hard enough.

    5. ROK does not hate them it just does not encourage the behavior they possesses. ROK is all about improving the lives of manginas, neckbeards, gays and white knights by having them learn to incorporate more alpha behavior in their lives. The gays are probably helpless because this site is dedicated to gaming women and to improving the lives of straight men. Honestly, I think a majority of the commenters on this site and readers are probably beta, manginas, neckbeards, etc.
      It is hard to find a real alpha these days but the point is to go towards that goal. Ideally we all want to start somewhere at the bottom, in our twenties with pounds of debt and fat. And to improve to a more clean-shaven or non-neckbeard beard (regular) with muscle and $200,000+ in salary by the time we are 35 and to never marry or settle for less.
      Tell me if I got that right Roosh or if I said anything wrong?

    6. Genius post! Extreme points of view from chauvinistic dipshits, whether male or female, are rarely true. ROK is as intolerant and stupid as any extreme crazy ass feminist blog. Bigotry is the order of the day.

      1. As with the crazy feminists, they are part of the outrage reactionary machine. The feminist blogosphere is full of toxic irritants unfortunately, but a reasoned intelligent human being should not descend to the level of crass and myopic arguments, to counter crass myopic arguments, but rise above it, and be gusty enough to entertain different points of view and perspectives.kudos to you for calling them out on their hypocrisy ..

    1. You must be ready to join the dark side before you can finally see the light.

    2. I feel the same way. I get angry and anxiety ridden reading ROK but I can’t stop. It has so much truth but a decent mix of bullshit and it just makes me hate women so much. I just want to hate fuck so many bitches JKSDAKDFSKADKAKDAKSK

  12. That Axelle girl… you say she’s joyful and spirited? Sounds like winning combination when paired with beauty.
    Feminism has always been a supremacist expression of bitter, ugly womens’ deficiencies. I am not surprised they would come to feast on her once her blood is in the water.

  13. Fuck is this chick talking about? YouTube is the place where women get hundreds of thousands of views for showing off what they have in their bedrooms.
    Web 2.0 is for women, because it is social media and shopping. Get off the internet, use it as a tool to get information only and live in the real world where these freaks have no power over you.

    1. The problem is YouTube isn’t Facebook where all of their ‘friends’ voting for them or they are commenting on how pretty they look or some other BS.
      On YT, they are hitting the real world – where anyone can comment and it hurts their feelings.
      FB is a safe place where women are always pretty (lol).

      1. See my previous comment on the Facebook/twitter censorship article where I give you reasons why these “safe spaces” need to exist from the tech company’s perspective; long and short of it is that they need the content these women create for free, and if they don’t “feel safe” they will leave to another site. Web 2.0, that’s what it’s about: urge women to “be social” to bring in views and then market everything under the sun to them. These women are the real suckers.

  14. “There are real problems afflicting women…”
    I’m sorry for my ignorance. What are these again?

    1. Low battery life on smartphone
      Had to pay for her own drink at the bar
      Ugly guy tried to start a conversation with her
      Office lunch room ran out of french vanilla flavored cappuccino
      Restaurant lighting was too low to take a good picture of her dish
      Friend’s mother just died and now she has to console her

      1. I’d say “FIRST WORLD PROBLEMS” but none of those seem to affect males (real males) so fair to say that “FIRST WORLD SEMI-FEMI PROBLEMS”.

      2. You forgot date wised up, went to the bathroom and ran out the door without paying.

  15. The fact that these people allow comments in the first place tells me that they are fishing for comments that validate their feelings rather than focusing on the actual content of their posts. Think about it: any YouTube user can set it so that comments have to be approved in advance. Even negative comments are fodder for these hoes as it gives them the opportunity to play the victim and generate more attention-whoring media bullshit. “Look: I’m being victimized by Internet _____-ism!”
    I don’t know about you, but I don’t give a rat’s ass what some random feminazi posts on the Internet. Beware being used as a tool; all publicity is good, even bad publicity. These hoes are paid by the click.

  16. Dear sweet christ on a stick would the editors of this site PLEASE learn the goddamn its/it’s distinction?!?! Please?!?!?!

      1. Oh come on, on a site that’s constantly promoting being the best you can be and rising above the average, I think it’s the fucking least we can ask for!

  17. Your writing style vaguely reminds me of a former ROK poster named “Edward Thatch”.

  18. Jenna Marbles also made a video in which she decimated sluts. Of course, the sluts cried “slut-shaming!” But Jenna left the video up, never apologizing for it like people do today when they buckle under PC pressure.

  19. This Jezebel feminists wouldn’t survive a day in eastern europe for example LOL

  20. Great article. So much for ‘women supporting other women’.
    I guess the motto should be ‘unattractive women supporting unattractive women’.
    The sad part is: if you take away the men and attractive women then they’ll start to tear each other down (no one is left).

  21. “there’s some guy standing by to shout about whether or not they want to see us naked.”
    Men are visual. A woman’s “value” to a man is in her looks. Period. We could not care less about your “accomplishments”, “career” or whatever. And feminists are usually ugly. So who cares what they have to say on any issue whatsoever. I don’t engage with them at all. But I’d bang Jenna (nice ass!)

  22. Dude, I did not read any of what you wrote. I just got stuck staring that pretty girl’s face.

  23. The proportion of dick-chopped men in puppet positions has reached critical levels. Lifeboat Earth hews to and fro. Feminist mutiny will sink us all lest we throw them off? It is the good and obedient women and mothers who must betray the great bitch force. Find the solace in your patriarch.

  24. >pedophiles for wanting a 13-year-old to get naked
    She’s pratically an adolescent at that point. Stop promoting the same feminazi bullshit ideology you so vehemently attack.

  25. You should pastebin / screenshot Jezebel articles to prevent add revenue / clicks

  26. So what’s it called when men belittle each other by categorizing them as beta or omega. Could it ..possibly be called ..hypocrisy?

    1. It’s called being objective with one another. Women, unable to be objective, can’t understand that. And women shame the same categories of men, they just choose more offensive phraseologies.

  27. She is so guilty off destroying the lives of so many men who have gone accused of sex crimes she has zero proof of. May the karma boomerang come back in full and take her stupid asshole head off

  28. I don’t understand the point of this article. Even if you believe the Erin tackled “what’s her name” because she’s jealous of her looks-which is a dubious assertion in the first place-you’re really going to write a 3,000 word article about it? That literally says a lot more about you than her. I just read one of Erin’s articles about how much of a douche Ryan Lochte is-clearly after stumbling across it after Lochte’s world class ambassador moment in Rio-and thought she was hilarious. If you’re a white guy in North America and you feel the need to complain about shit this much, you’re a total fucking pussy. I’m sorry, but really, there’s nothing you have to bitch about. You’re living in western civilization’s idea of the unalienable rights, free society wet dream and you’re pissed because a woman doesn’t like it when another woman, who’s a complete moron, kills animals for fun? Dude, grow some fucking balls.

Comments are closed.