Q: “Are you a rapist?”
No. I’ve never been accused or charged with rape by a single woman. My macho sex writing has been grossly taken out of context by feminists and SJWs. I may be a chauvinist, but I’m not a rapist. See: The Accusation That I’m A Rapist Is A Malicious Lie.
Q: “Why do you want to legalize rape?”
I don’t. Legalizing rape is a notion so insanely absurd I never imagined that people would take it 100% seriously, including politicians. I don’t believe any form of physical violence against men or women should be legalized. I’ve said that “How To Stop Rape” was a satirical thought experiment so many times that it’s clear to me current misinterpretation of it by the media is deliberate.
Q: “Why do you want to teach guys how to rape?”
I teach guys how to be sexually attractive. This includes being confident and masculine, traits that women say they don’t love, but respond favorably to anyway. There is not a single known case of one of my supporters being involved in a crime that has been linked to my writing. If there was, the media would certainly report on it.
Q: “I still hate your fucking guts.”
Instead of focusing your anger on real problems in your neighborhood, city, and country, the media has made you emotional against a man who poses absolutely no threat to anyone. I’m being used as a target so that you can expend your rage on me instead of other entities that are genuinely hurting your standard of living.
Q: “Are you ashamed of writing that article?”
More lament than shame. I haven’t messed around with rape topics since that article was written a year ago because people absolutely lose their minds when it comes to rape. Objectively, as a writer, that article was a raging success, a once-in-a-lifetime perfect storm. Writers can only dream of getting that kind of exposure. Realistically, I am disappointed at the flood of negative attention that will now put me in the “rape proponent” box for the rest of my life. I’ll have to tell my future kids one day that daddy is not actually a rapist.
Q: “You’re lying! You were serious!”
A man right now can claim he’s a woman and everyone is supposed to immediately call him a “she,” even though he’s still biologically male, but when another man claims that an article that came from his brain using his own words had a certain intention, he’s a “liar.” People will believe what satisfies their existing world view.
Q: “Mate if you come to my city I’m going to kill you.”
I have noticed that the cities and countries that are most eager to ban or threaten me are ones that I’ve long advised heterosexual men to escape from (Canada, UK, Australia).
Q: “Are you a real life troll or not?”
I was given a gift to be interesting and sensational. I can wrap subtle truths in packaging that gets massive attention. I don’t do it on purpose—it just comes out naturally in my personality and writing. It’s not something I can just turn off.
Q: “Are you a pick up artist?”
I started my writing career with pickup. My current work features it much less so I don’t presently identify as a “PUA,” though I stand by my older work.
Q: “Are you a men’s rights activist?”
No, but I sympathize with their views. I would call myself a neomasculinist.
Q: “Well I don’t think you’re actually pro rape, so what’s your platform neomasculinity about?”
It’s simply the ideas of traditional masculinity combined with modern truths of the world, including the truth that the mainstream establishment is actively marginalizing heterosexual men. You can read details about neomasculinity at “What Is Neomasculinity?”
The ideas in that document contain my true beliefs.
Q: “How can I learn more?”
Check out Return Of King’s Top 35 Articles. Then check out my top 50 articles listed in the right column of my personal blog. I also have an active Youtube channel, Facebook, and Twitter.
(Via rooshv.com: Everything You Wanted To Know About Daryush “Roosh” Valizadeh But Were Afraid To Ask)
What are your religious beliefs? Are you a Atheist, Christian, Muslim?
Explain why that matters.
It doesn’t matter to me personally. It was more article I have read been accusing Roosh of being a Muslim. I would like to reply yes or no and who care rather than I think he is or is not. It seems to me that Roosh family background would indicate him being from the Armenian Christian Church. But his life style would be closer to a more Atheist take.
Where did you hide the bodies?
Good job.
I doubt it will satisfy the faith-based mob, though. They’ll still scream “WIIIIITCH!”
I don’t think it’s aimed at them.
I agree. I was just commenting.
Well, this is why I’ve said to atheists that getting rid of religion is not going to get rid of the hysterical witch hunts. The problem here is human nature not religion by itself (but humans being humans have abused it like they do everything else).
In fact, atheism makes witch hunts worse. People have an innate need to believe in something greater than themselves. Without God, we have conspiracy theories.
I can’t upvote this enough. Without God every manner of social and cultural insanity is indulged.
In Ohio our motto is “With God, All Things Are Possible”. The modernists motto then, to me, is “Without God, All Insane Psychopathic Things Are Plausible”.
To his credit, Roosh weighs more than a duck.
You gotta wonder if anyone will actually bother reading beyond the first sentence before they roll their face all over their keyboard.
Do you eat Irish children? What seasoning do you recommend?
chop up the meat and do it in a croc pot with baby carrots and rosemary potatoes. Dip biscuts in when done…yummy!
It’s hard to beat a home cooked Baby N’ Biscuits breakfast.
Baby : The other white meat.
(We should be careful, or we’ll get accused of cannibalism next! ;))
I can’t speak for Roosh, but for me it’s sage, garlic and just a hint of cumen. Some traditionalists also include olive oil, but I find that this lends a distinct and undesirable sweetness that is completely unnecessary.
I like to soak my dead Irish children in Guinness. But for extra flavor, I force-feed them some Irish Whiskey while they are still alive.
This is a bit of irony really. If I wanted dead Irish adults, I don’t have to force feed the whiskey, but after puberty, the Irish taste like a mix of stale potatoes and dirty socks.
As an actual genetic Scotsman I should take offense at this, but all I can do is think of different spices to recommend. Strange, right?
The only way to eat Irish children is slow-marinaded in Irish booze.
Scots are a special. treat. Prepare like Haggis.
As an actual Irishman I should take offence, but I do like the idea of being marinated in booze. I’ll pass on the cannibalism, though.
The olive oil also makes them taste too much like wop and guido children, which are too greasy for my pallet.
Plus you can’t turn up the temperature for a proper searing. Olive oil is very finicky on temps.
Aye but you never have to add your own oil.
Aw heck. My half Mediterranean ancestry leads me biased towards using olive oil for cooked Irish children I’m afraid 😀
Oh, come on! Who eats Irish children when you can eat leprechauns? Serve one up with a side of potatoes and watch the game-you’ll have all the luck! http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_MT87LlLV_E/UyNvyDrjnsI/AAAAAAAABOk/3LOQlfF2ZRc/s1600/1.jpg
Boiled with cabbage and butter. A dash of salt and pepper, to taste.
I like fricassee myself. It’s a modest proposal of sensational dining!
The trick to eating Irishmen is to remove their little wool hats first.
That’s fucking epic. I really laughed hard at that one.
Are you merely a self-interested man who just wants to life a self-Interested life of meaningless sex?
Show me a man who does not work at some level on self-interest.
Suicide cases don’t count.
Good luck.
Yup. Or a woman for that matter.
All human beings work on some level with self interest. Every time we eat, we are engaged in pure selfishness.
I like when Leftists try to pretend to be altruists.
I’m getting a lot of emails along the lies of “Is what the media saying true?” The above article is intended for them, since they’re prepared to make decisions based on actual evidence.
How about making rooshv.com and returnofkings.com subscription only sites…? At least in terms of posting on your discussion boards, for example? I, for one, would be glad to pay a fee if it would help defray the costs involved in excluding the degenerates who contributed to ruining our meet-up, pollute your discussion boards, rail against you in the media as a result of free access to your sites, etc.
I this point I would actually pay a fee to make something private . Tired of these idiots coming in and ruining our discussions . We haven’t even had a decent article this week
I actually find their “contributions” useful. They don’t stick around (outside of high clickbait, like this meetup) and they make great foils.
Besides making roosh money they only clog up the comment section
I may be alone in this, but I find them excellent practice. My audience is not their friends, but the lurkers watching the discussion.
The chicks with their feeewings posts that go on for ten pages though, yeah, totally agree.
Yep, long after it is done and they have run, the evidence of their defeat stays until they hit delete.
Never thought of it like that , good point .
Aye. This is why God invented Copy/Paste. When it’s a real argument about significant points not already covered ad nauseum, I’ll copy paste their post. Because they are famous for hit and run deletes.
know thy enemy.
Indeed.
Your handle makes me curious. Are you Australian?
Looking through the most recent articles, you can see the discussions they infiltrate. The articles about the US elections, refugees, the one-handed push up one and world news have maybe 100 or a few hundred comments at most. The ones they have infiltrated: over 2000!!!!!
The outrage is intense but short lived. This time next week we could announce we are having another official meet up and barely a fraction would be aware.
Yeah but you got to call a bunch of people retards.
any dealings with the extremists should be done with those watching in mind. This is very important.
You will never convince those extremists, but how eloquent, calm and respectful you are and not resorting to personal attacks or your whole argument being swear words will demonstrate to those “lurkers” which side is more reasonable.
The last few days will result in a few regulars to ROK mehinks. Welcome.
nah, much closer to the other guy who upvoted this.
I think instead of meetups that folk in various cities arrange semi-public gatherings. Call them men’s rights speeches.
True , also another good point
Then it would be easy for groups like #anonymous to hack and dox members – not really an option. Plus, paid memberships aren’t really the point of our men’s movement.
I actually think anon would be on our side, especially if they saw this site wants to show free expression of ideas vs, the threat of PC and governmental tyranny. I would hope they are reading this and read the archived articles and initiate contact.
Except they aren’t and went after Roosh this week.
they are a big group and should dialog
There has been an very real effort to ensure that most “hackers” are SJWs. I’ve watched anonymous closely and most of them are either not deep-thinking enough to know the core issues (and thus would fall for “Roosh is a rapist” hype) or are full blown Tumblr level SJWs complete with GLBT Oak Leaf Cluster.
I say “effort” because there is a pattern in their opinions and ideals, at least the ones who show an opinion. While Anonymous is not centralized, there is an effort to “direct” them. You need look no further than what their “OPS” are about, and what their OPS are never or very rarely about. For example, how many leftist groups get hacked, doxxed, and have their employee rosters posted online?
it’d be better to spread the ideology far and wide
That would be the opposite of effective. Sun Tzu spoke at length about allowing one’s forces to become besieged.
4th Generation Warfare – nebulous cells fighting for a cause rather than a single leader or land. This is the strategy we must adopt if we are to defeat the monstrosities which oppose us.
I understand your reasoning. I wouldn’t be able to chip in though, money’s tight, so I’d be left out. Also, I think it’s important to know your enemy. What better way than to read the trolls!!
I personally think a lawyer and publicist should be hired to ride out this sh!tstorm.
“Someone please show me how to legally disenfranchise all women without coming off as an awful human being!”
Bah, let people know femidiocy by reading their garbage posts here, while we discuss seriously
Well, I’m a big fan of this site, but while I’m until I go to college, it’s to pay a fee and risk anyone I know finding out. Nobody knows I use this site because I’m in Canada, and my reputation would be ruined with friends and family.
It was so stupid of anyone not to see it as satire.
But not 100 percent. Because you really are a rapist according to the new feminazi standards of what constitutes consent in Berkley.
I simply cannot fathom anyone screwing according to the “Consent is sexy” videoes.
I think it would make everyone who grew up in the 70’s and 80’s a rapist. I get pissed off.
So it was not satire for people who have no sense of humor.
“Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.” — H.L. Menken ; I would expand that to the entire planet.
I believe the miscommunication stems from what Quintus was saying in the latest podcast; that the form of satire Roosh was using was classical satire, not modern satire such as the Austin Powers movies or Weirld Al Yankovic.
Classical satire, such as Lysistrata (where women of Greece all plot to withhold sex from their husbands in the hope of ending a war) presents the audience with a ridiculous scenario (such as making rape legal) and then exploring the socetial repercussions.
In modern satire, we are presented with material that mocks (usually humorously) the source material while being similar to it.
It’s disappointing but not surprising that this has to be explained.
And the best satire is that which has nuggets of truth in it.
Read: I take pleasure in the idea of being declared victor over any woman’s body.
Please, mansplain this to me.
Easy, you’re retarded.
No, I don’t debate masculine ideas or thoughts with women. Try someone else.
I don’t think we even could, mansplaining isn’t a word.
I do know it is highly unlikely she is prepared to entertain any explanation especially considering this article provides the link to the other article in question and yet look at how she chose to “interpret” (read: ignore and deny) your comment about good satire being founded in truth.
My little feelings are so very hurt. Please don’t call me any more meaningless names that only make you look better by supposedly neutralizing opposing views. I might cry.
I could explain to you that your idea of ‘classical’ satire is lacking the nuance of intent in either of the traditional categories of social satire, but you decided to go right ahead and make assumptions about my thinking processes and ability to consider ‘masculine thoughts’ instead, so I’ll let you continue inhabiting this delusional little bubble of filth. The absolute best debate happens when you can’t even start to address your adversary as someone on equal footing, amirite?Have fun with those meaningful relationships you plan on nurturing with your subservient womenfolk.
I do take pleasure in that, because it’s what they really want deep down, and we both know it.
Wait, are you “womansplaining” right now?
Or have you finished trying to use fake words already?
You have unlocked the secret to a happy and meaningful future with someone very special. You might want to set up a pen for the goats you receive as her dowry.
I saw a term “Femote” – applying emotions to silence criticism instead of engaging in dialogue.
“I see you femoting about this problem. Here, let me mansplain it to you…”
Couldn’t come up with a response to real logic? It’s okay, there’s always next time.
She hasn’t figured out I’m not going to engage her on a serious level and don’t give a fig about her, but she sure is desperately chasing after my attention. Have a good evening Taignobias I’m going to get some shut eye.
I remember ROK not allowing women or homosexuals to comment. When did this policy change?
And Sarah, your shrill whining isnt very feminine.
Your lack of general human decency isn’t very masculine.
Yet here you are.
Enjoy your lifetime of cats as you’ll never get a husband with that attitude.
Uses ‘amirite’. Conclusion? She’s not on an equal intellectual footing with you. Save your discourse for a worthier mind.
This woman actually seems to be making valid points, but your fear of a smart independent person possessing a vagina is blocking your ability to see that.
Good mangina bitch. Good. Now, gtfo.
I’m a rapist i just found out. I banged my girlfriend many times when she was dead drunk. She didnt mind it seems, I think she likes rapes !
And I just found out another thing, she raped me too ! Because I was piss drunk too ! We are constantly raping each other, we outta turn each other in, maybe we can serve time together..but im afraid she might rape me in the shower..
It’s all about equality!
One of my favorite movie scenes below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yg2-_nkFhe4
My question:
Do you enjoy making breaitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos so jealous and will this ultimately result in a dramatic and ambiguously gay cage match?
😀
Dude, Milo deserves instant respect in the manosphere. He’s gay, but he writes and is more logical than 99% of men his age. He can be on my side of the debate any day, any time.
When I see supposed Red Pillers gushing over a gay jew, I realize how distorted reality has become in our world.
Totally agree, for a fag Milo is one tough mother fucker. Glad he’s on our side.
Count me as a red piller gushing over a gay Jew. He’s a righteous dude.
Gushing?
He’s on point on every topic he writes about. I have no use for his “lifestyle” but the man is clearly on our side, for now.
Oh I love Milo, but I won’t be going camping with him.
Milo is Very Brilliant.
Exactly!
“is more logical than 99% of men his age”
That is what I refer to as “gushing”.
Which is meaningless. Show me other Millenial men showing his common sense.
Don’t get me wrong, if you have some, I’ll embrace them too. In dire times, you pull your allies into your camp, you don’t get all snooty.
He also said that atheists are evil. Can’t be bothered to look up the vid for the exact wording, but it was something to that effect. As such, I don’t much care for him.
What matters is a functional amygdala. Anything else is commentary.
I’m not a fan of Milo. He is right about a lot of political ideas, yet he seems to have the typical self-esteem problem shared by all fagsexualists, and his best efforts are only a liability because of his degeneracy.
I do not like Jack Donavan for the same reason. He too is right about a lot of political ideas, yet having an unrepentant fagsexualist represent those ideas is a liability.
Each one of them probably has the womanly aspect of a vulnerable psyche, and the neediness for male validation, which is precisely why I would not grant that validation.
Anyone who leaves me alone is OK in my book. I don’t care at all what he does in his personal life as long as he supports our right to our own opinions and individual freedom. I am a Breitbart Rightly anyway.
I agree, and likewise, I don’t like to see Fascists gushing over any fagsexualist. Case in point – Jack Donovan. The point is simply that you don’t want a fagsexualist as grand marshal of your militaristic Fascist parade!
Also, regarding this matter of “legalizing rape”, I would say it was a poor choice of words, amounting to trolling, yet there is something to be said regarding the limitations of law enforcement on private property.
For example, how is the court supposed to discover the truth of what happened when a drunk woman invites a drunk man to her home after they met at the bar?
For practical reasons, it was previously impossible to determine if the woman were telling the truth in such a case. This does not mean rape is therefore legal, only that it cannot be prosecuted, usually for lack of evidence.
Since that time, circumstances have changed. Now, imagine a scenario wherein that woman had camera rolling and recorded the crime?
Okay, so there is a possible exception to the scenario which was previously not reliable grounds for prosecution.
Furthermore, home invasion rape is another scenario taking place on private property, only the property belongs to the raped woman.
Roosh was trolling and he did not consider all the scenarios, other than the typical rape hoax of the man invited home by a drunk slut who has regret the next day and then lies to deflect attention from her slutty behavior. This is all too common, and one of my friends was falsely accused in precisely that way.
Anyway, it was a careless choice of words by Roosh, not covering all possible scenarios, yet there is the plain fact the courts simply cannot reliably convict nor can they exonerate the typical acquaintance rape accusation.
For that slightly careless and eccentric idea, presented in the manner of “A Modest Proposal”, a man should not be hanged by the mob, nor convicted by the court of public opinion.
For those real rapes by men leaping from the dark ally or from the bushes in Central Park, or home invasion rapes, having a solid conviction, the death penalty is the right punishment for the rapist.
For the alleged acquaintance rapes, the law should neither convict nor exonerate when there is insufficient evidence. The district attorney should not even prosecute.
Agreed and thanks for the backup bro.
It’s not that I think Milos and Jack should be silenced but they certainly should not be the heroes of the movement. I could never 100% trust them not to lead young men down the primrose path.
Milo is more manly than all of the beta, white knight, hetero cucks do collectively.
Even Milo is against the feminization and degeneracy of society. It is a strange situation, given his sexual orientation, no doubt.
I am not saying he’s not a good writer. We need more straight masculine writers to rise to his level of exposure. He would have had a much tougher time of it had he not been a gay Jew, and that gives him a certain pass to write things for Breitbart that others couldn’t get away with. I’m not tearing the guy down but there needs to be more representation from people who are more like us.
Milo is a “true” homo, meaning, he is just homo for himself. He dont need to make a show out of it, and make everyone else turn gay. Todays homos, I dont know, perhaps they are not even homos, just betas who have given up on women, looking for attention.
Everyone are welcome here. What unite us is not race or sexuality. It’s the red pill. The Pill makes us see everything like it is.
He is jew ? not that it matters to me I like the man.
If you cant even be bothered then fuck off, we cant be bothered.
Quit being a deracinated loser.
Your attack is too weak for me amount any counter.
Greek and Jewish descent. The ennemy of my ennemy is my friend.
Milo is a national treasure. His gayness is a type of kevlar body armor that allows him all sorts of SJW privilege.
He’s Greek Catholic
“Camping”. Heh.
Fair enough, it’s fucking pathetic that we need gay men to stand up for straight men, I hate that dichotomy.
Said the Jew Mr. Levinson, who, tellingly, seems obsessed with Milo’s gayness.
Yeah, well that is just precisely the point. We do not need degenerates as interlocutors. We should reject the LGBT caste system. Their doctrine is false.
Those chronically deviated to faggotry really are pitiful basket cases. Repulsive and pathetic, somehow so sick they’re incapable of seeing only a woman can cure what ails them.
Most likely, he got faggotized by an older deviant at a young age. Whereas, if you believe the jewish LGBT doctrine, he is genetically defective and probably unfit for breeding. There is no proof of that hypothesis.
Furthermore, the jewish LGBT doctrine invites sexual perverts into the life of children who are deemed to have been “born that way”. LGBT doctrine is devilry and they need exorcism. Faggotized white men of no disease and good quality should breed.
*to amount
BTW, you’re still a deracinated loser.
THE AMBIGUOUSLY GAY DUO!!!
whats everybody looking at?
Giving it to milo (verbally) would not be gay but taking it from him would be. But with animals it’s universal. Giving it to a donkey is just as much beastiality as taking it from a donkey.
Roosh, a bunch of SJW faggots, probably in accord with Anonymous, released your stateside address. Watch out.
From A.W.E.S.O.M.-O
You still haven’t answered my question. My question is ARE YOU READY TO STEP INTO THE RING WITH ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY POUNDS OF RUTHLESS AGGRESSION? ONE NIGHT ONLY, IN A FIVE ROUND LOCK UP. A KNOCK DOWN, DRAG OUT FIGHT FOR THE AGES. NO HOLDS BARRED. GET READY TO ENTER A WORLD DEVOURING VOID OF PAIN AND TERROR, AS THE UNKNOWABLE GEOMETRY OF MY FISTS WRAP YOUR BRAIN IN EXISTENTIAL TERROR. ROLL A SANITY CHECK TO SEE IF YOU CAN SURVIVE.
But for real, I want to fight you in a sanctioned match. Referee and everything.
Hello Roosh,
Thank you for clarifying that you do not advocate for rape. I have a few more questions.
My questions:
What is your stance on abortion? Do you feel a woman should have the full right to terminate a pregnancy before 20 weeks? Should a woman be required permission from a man to have an abortion?
You believe, from my understanding, that men should be the provider of the family while women tend to the children and the home. What should be done to men who leave their wives and children high and dry? What process should be in place to protect women who devote their lives to their “feminine” nature?
A close friend of mine was beaten so badly her ribs were broken, literally over spilled milk. Her abuser is quite a vocal supporter of you. What do you have to say to these men?
Are women only valuable based on their appearance? And subservience to men?
If women are meant to tend to children, do you think society should become more accepting to mothers, particularly those with small children? Do you think it is acceptable that women are harassed for breastfeeding in public?
In a recent viral video, a man found out his girlfriend had been cheating on him and forced her to walk home naked. I feel that this sort of abuse is not acceptable towards men or women. I know that there is a double standard that does need to be addressed. Aside from that, do you believe that was acceptable behavior?
How is your relationship with your mother? Does she know and understand your values?
Please do not specify your religious beliefs, I simply want to know, do you follow any organized region?
What are your opinions on raising young boys? Should they be taught from an early age that being more sensitive is unacceptable?
Do you hate all LGBTQ? Or do you simply not want them associated with your movement? Do you support discrimination against LGBTQs? .
What are your thoughts on polygamy?
Do you think monogamy is anti-masculine and/or an unacceptable standard for men?
**Please excuse any errors in my comment. I am trying to do many things at once, but you’ve spike my curiosity.
I like your questions and think they create a great starting point to dialogue. I’ll be personally happy to answer your questions and I think other open minded red-pill men could benefit from discussing such, but I wouldn’t compel them.
There’s an aggressive slant to many of these questions that I’m not crazy about, but some of the questions are readily addressed.
If you would like to take the time to answer any of the questions I have asked I would like to see your response. If you feel a question is loaded or rude my feelings won’t be hurt if it’s skipped. I am trying to be open minded.
…I’d rather an aggressive woman I can talk to that is open minded vs some airhead who thinks the height of literature is “50 shades of slap my face and spit on me.”
Well, then, let me preface this with the assertion that there are many viewpoints reflected on this and other such sites. As such, any answers will be approved by some and rejected by others.
Starting with abortion, I am opposed on moral and religious grounds to terminating pregnancy. However, I can understand why some might consider terminating pregnancy, and they’re not inherently invalid reasons. I am willing to assert that, if it were illegal, there would be fewer pregnancies (because it would be more costly to become pregnant).
Brittany, they say that the truth is bitter. Also that if you ever find yourself on the side of the majority, you should reflect. Look around you. society is broken. The ancient times are more stable than the present day. Roosh is only advocating basic truths: real men believe in God or at least believe in spirituality, women are primarily made to reproduce (if not men would have wombs too), homosexuals are free to live as they please, they have existed since biblical times nothing new. most women know intrinsically that youth is vital for mating; its only in the west men are shamed for going after young girls that are legal of course. 18-22 is indeed the most attactive age bracket for women – the smart ones lock down a partner in that time. Roosh is all for women having careers – he is just saying it was not the primary intent of their creation. women loving men who beat them is over 30 generations old phenomenon.
On the issue of men in the provider role:
This is the state of man found in almost every society, because men are designed to handle strenuous labor more readily than women. Generally, a balance is struck in which men work the fields and women tend to the home – this is apparent in even American society up until the Industrial Revolution.
Currently, there are few social incentives for men to adopt the traditional provider role, especially among those sufficiently impoverished to enjoy the full benefits of welfare. Divorces are primarily initiated by women, and women tend to enjoy the benefits of comparatively large settlements (50% of income at time of divorce, child custody, etc). In such an environment, it is not illogical for men to fail to marry and/or provide for children.
In addition, women have the primary ownership of children (that is, right to determine whether to abort a child, give it up for adoption, or raise it). This principle is the reason why it is not illogical for a man to hide from a woman he has impregnated, if he has no desire to be a father.
In sum, the social considerations of your second question block run deeper than you seem to realize.
Abortion is a personal decision. It is up to each individual to decide what is good for them. It is a free society. The rape article is satire.
Men rely on facts. I just gave you facts.
Returnofkings aims to advance humanity in positive ways! If 18-22 is the best age for women – men know its the truth but the PC brigade deny it – a spreading of the truth makes girls better informed. You cannot and can never force a man to be with a 34 years old he does not find attractive regardless of any equality laws or shaming.
” If 18-22 is the best age for women …” — The girl I’m suffering a BAD case of ‘Oneitis’ for is 29…her age isn’t as important to me as her potential in fertility, and of course closing the deal one day. 😉 *sigh*
good luck to you then. most monogamy oriented men however do seek out young women as it ensures a large fertility/ good looking window.
I don’t want to start an abortion debate. I feel abortion is an acceptable option. We can agree to disagree? I think sex education and affordable access to birth control is important. Ideally, we would prevent a crisis situation.
It’s a hot topic. I phrased my answer in the best way I could, because I perceive the problem from a number of angles.
In the US, I feel that most high earning jobs don’t require a person to endure strenuous labor. A lot of work is more mentally challenging than psychically.
I don’t know anything about divorce statistics, because I haven’t done any research on them. I think for the most part people divorce because they married someone they were incompatible with for the novelty of marriage, not for the partnership and companionship. I also see marriage as that, partnership and companionship. While parenthood is a beautiful thing, it can’t be the sole reason for a marriage or it simply will not work.
I have noticed, in Florida, that the state prefers 50/50 custody and hope that the trend continues. Fathers are valuable, just as we need to place more value on motherhood, it’s my opinion that fatherhood is equally important.
As it is illogical to bear responsibility for anyone other than oneself and those over whom one has sovereignty (as parents are sovereign over their children), there is no need to address the question of the abusive male.
The question of value relates to social and sexual value. It is true that a woman’s value on the dating scene is related to her attractiveness and femininity – anyone who asserts otherwise is trying to sell you something. It is also true that a man’s value on the same market is based on his social standing, masculinity, and resources.
This is an observation of the way things are, not the way things ought to be. We could argue all day that a “strong, independent woman who don’t need no man” should be more attractive than a young and feminine Blonde without education, but that would not reflect the dynamics of the dating scene as we observe it. Equally, we could argue that all women should be attracted to the reliable, soft-spoken guy with the steady income, but that would not reflect the dating scene as observed. This distinction between “is” and “should be” confuses many newcomers.
Skipping the abusive male.
My question may have been worded wrong. I am not only referring to the dating scene but entirely. I feel like a lot of what I am reading is that women are not important once they have aged. (Not saying this is from YOU. Just what I have seen around, hoping you can offer insight.)
I feel that this idea, that men will usually seek out a younger and more beautiful woman, is insulting to men. Do men only find beauty externally, and in young women? I feel like the definition of beauty evolves as we grow older. Sure, we will always think some things are attractive. But the value we place on that trait changes. I will never understand how someone would trade loyalty and love for a 19 year old vagina. But, I am a woman. So I wouldn’t, would I?
A few quick thoughts:
1. Once a woman has lost the attractiveness and feminine charms of youth, she has lost the only unique value women possess. She may still have other values, but she has diminished because the special values she once possessed are gone. Because so few women appreciate these values, they often fail to develop the lasting values to the extent that men do (because, quite frankly, we don’t have such built-in value).
2. We can agree that we are sexual creatures. As such, men are driven by our very natures to appreciate young (and fertile) women with feminine tendencies. This is the product of our physical nature, which seeks the best chance for childbirth and rearing.
3. If you get that loyalty and love from your partner, you usually don’t wander. The people who “trade loyalty and love for a 19 year old vagina” most often have neither.
No , most men do not buy into this philosophy that older women are worthless. Most men understand that every human being ages, and that people who love each other appreciate each other’s beauty throughout life, no matter how old and wrinkled they get.
Most real men wouldn’t trade loyalty and love for a 19 year old vagina either. The people on this site aren’t really men, they’re boys. Roosh is 36 and lives in his mother’s basement. Everything they know about life they’ve picked up from people like themselves who live their lives through blogs and Twitter.
It is right and just. Good feminine women will often go out of their way to take care of themselves for the sake of others. Contrast to fashion nowadays where women mutilate their body for the sake of narcissistic attention getting. A sad state of affairs.
The reason we go to youth is not only biological drive but the fact that younger women have had less opportunity to be brainwashed to hate men.
Here’s the advice we give to women: use your youthful beauty to find a man before you age. Then you two will develop a pair bond and he won’t care that you’re aging. A strategy that’s thousands of years old.
Hello all, I am reading responses as they come in. I am just trying to let you finish and read a few things on here before I respond.
@Brittney-As a Catholic I believe abortion is murder.
There was a time when mothers were honored in all societies. Ideally, that time will come again, despite the common denigration in media and feminist sources.
Breastfeeding is a good and right thing for a mother to do – studies have shown it to be beneficial for infants. However, if the people who hold sovereignty over a region (city, mall, etc.) do not permit a behavior in public, then they do not permit a behavior in public. In order to change such policies, it is necessary to change the society that has put those policies in place. To that end, I wish those who would repeal breastfeeding ordinances the best.
Ideally, that would come again. Along with it, the value of fatherhood.
I don’t want to get into a breastfeeding in public debate. Our difference are more political. It was a normal response. I don’t agree, but that is okay.
In the case of the viral video:
Not a fan. It was not good of her to cheat, and it was not good of him to force her to be naked in public. Evil does not cancel evil.
However, it is important to note that worse abuses perpetrated by women against men are celebrated. While his actions were not good, it is interesting to note that the backlash against him is greater than that against, say, “Mattress Girl”.
The viral video points to deeper problems at work, here.
Love my mom. Next question.
I’m Christian. Others are atheist, agnostic, Muslim, Jew, Hindu, etc.
All truth is truth. All wisdom is wisdom.
Athiest here. 🙂
Why should he answer any of those questions? Abortion has been around long before feminism. No one here is a specific disciple of Roosh. It’s an open dialogue of ideas. No one agrees or disagrees on all of them e.g. Most on here aren’t anti LGBT however they are against the agenda that strengthens post critical theory institutions and destroys classical ones.
Women have been killing unborn babies for centuries…which is why the Jewish Priests felt it necessary to address it in Leviticus…but I’m not here to argue theology…if a woman wants to have a doctor terminate her pregnancy, that’s her business…I am not a fan of Planned Parenthood, but that’s only because I don’t want my tax dollars paying for it. If liberals & feminists want abortion centers in the cities, they can pay for it out of their own pocket…I certainly won’t stand in the way of Margaret Sanger’s dream.
Boys will be boys. That’s not just a saying – there are aspects of masculinity that appear to be naturally programmed into men.
Overly sensitive men are stomped on in society, so I would never raise a son to be that way. The men who get the most in life display the classic virtues, and the younger you are when you start working on these principles the better your chances are.
On a side note, every boy needs a father. Just as it makes little sense for a man to teach a girl how to be a woman, it makes little sense for a woman to teach a boy to be a man. Those who have no father either find one (heck, it could be Roosh), or go crazy (a la Elliot Rogers, who only had a father on paper).
“Boys will be boys” is a common phrase that has really become a subject of controversy.
Boys will be boys. When I hear this I think of a 6 year old jumping off of a bunk bed with a make shift super hero cape.
I do feel that the vast majority of boys show a difference from girls from early on. My issue with the statement is that it’s often used to side step responsibility. Just because a boy is behaving in a masculine way doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be held accountable for his actions. When this phrase is used to excuse a male from his personal accountability I find it insulting to males.
(Personal accountability could be a lot of things. Breaking a lamp, harming another, defying a parent, etc.)
I feel that it should be acceptable for boys to be sensitive. If that is truly who they are, embrace it.
I clearly agree with your side note. I hope that was made clear.
I cannot speak for everyone in every place, but I’ve never seen “boys will be boys” used to excuse behavior for which the boy should be held accountable. If a boy is playing baseball in the house, the parents might say “boys will be boys”, but they make him sweep it up, pay for it, and usually assign a further punishment. It would be foolish to act any other way.
What is significant is that boys will do what boys will do. This is a reality that must be understood. We naturally form hierarchies, fight, compete and keep score, and defy authority. It’s in our nature, and it must be understood and directed rather than denigrated.
If I read you right, you already embrace these ideas, but I wanted to clarify.
I despise the LGBTQIA… community activists. These same individuals have punished anyone who dissents (like those bakers), denigrated “cis-het-white men”, and sought to make any critique of their lifestyles into hate speech. They push an oppressive narrative and social structure that would see me punished for existing.
On the whole, I have no quarrel with homosexuals and the like. I’ve been called attractive by men I have no sexual interest in – this is fine. I’ve been shot down by venomous lesbians who thought the idea of me finding them attractive is abhorrent – this is also fine. I’ve seen preachers call homosexuality a sin – fine – and I’ve seen gay men making out in front of those preachers’ churches – fine. I’m a fan of Milo Yiannopoulos, and I’ve seen him deep-throat a microphone – fine.
This community is catered toward heterosexual men, and there should be no shame in that. This is the principle of free association.
I’m conflicted on polygamy. On the one hand, it makes sense from a lot of naturalist standpoints. On the other hand, there is great value to a loving pair-bond between a man and a woman.
I think it’s acceptable so long as everyone agrees and consents. I was just curious.
Monogamy is not anti-masculine, although it does drive down testosterone. In the modern society, however, it is becoming unreasonable to assume that a monogamous relationship will last more than about three years.
Ideally, monogamy is the best of all worlds. In the modern culture, polygamy is about as good as we’ll ever get.
i think this post inadvertently advertises the nonsensical social issues women think are important
this is why women shouldnt vote
You have to look into libel and defamation suits after this one Roosh, the media has to be held legally accountable for their hand in this if at all possible. Perhaps a class action?
^^^ hell yeah….look at the Scientologists….no one f*cks with them, they are more than willing to make the media their bitch. Remember : The process is the punishment. Use their tactics against you.
If only the govt in Australia focused the same fervent idealism they banned you with directed at the coming tidal wave of 12,000 strong Islamic ideologues. Despite the government own sources stating that it will create a cultural schism and might dramatically increase violent, sexual and terrorist based crime.
The globalist controlled media is losing their handle on the narrative…Lol.
Remember the old dirty media question : “When did you stop beating your wife?” ? That’ll now be replaced by : “How long have you been a legal rape advocate?”
since they’re not prepared you mean
RAPE!!!
No one can ever guarantee anyones safety. How is that your responsibioloty? Buy an umbrella liability insurance policy if youre worried about being sued.
Care to comment? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3432531/Pictured-pick-artist-center-international-pro-rape-storm-t-shirt-shorts-door-mother-s-home-lives-basement.html
I have had conversations about the notorious article with people who are otherwise rational, and they have devolved into gibbering insanity. They’d construct statements that were simultaneously AND and OR statements; affirm the precedent; contradict themselves, and begin sweating and speaking in tongues.
The level of thought control is frightening. This sort of thing ends in piles of bodies.
To our advantage, for the first time in history, “we” are armed to the teeth. There are no easy pickings…this time.
And unlike past decent into tyranny, they operators of it were not so exposed. Did the Leninists every chimp out so bad?
I once asked some old Germans about the rise of Nazis. I was told : “They were very polite”.
Compare that to the chimping out free-bleeding tumblerina. Our successors will look back in 100 years and think we were off the ball for even taking more than a month to defeat them.
Haha yep. At the height of the campus controversies last fall I had this exact same experience. Seemingly normal students suddenly devolved into salivating lunatics.
I tried reasoning with people about these meetings, but they don’t listen.
Imagine that you are a lesbian women, that only finds women attractive and men repulsive, for such women heterosexual intercourse is perceived as rape. So when you hear some women talking about rape, maybe you should remember this.
Dafuq?
This tactic does not work! https://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
Shaming tactic does not work! https://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
I would immediately forget this as it is dumbest thing I’ve heard all day. You are saying that mere existence of heterosexual intercourse anywhere in the universe is ‘rape’ if the thought enters the consciousness of lesbians.
According to my experiences in college, this is actually what they say. Dworkin is your google destination. Even heterosexual intercourse, consensual, between man and wife is rape to them.
Welcome to the red pill.
I am faimiliar with that idea (which btw under the same reasoning all male labor would be slavery) but this person seems to be saying that merely hearing about an act not committed with them still somehow rapes him or her (psychically perhaps?).
Honestly I can’t really account for the attitudes of the man-hating lesbians. I know for a fact that many lesbians do not hate men, btw.
The problem he highlights however is that this absurd notion is increasingly, slowly of course, becoming more and more accepted. As witness, men in universities are now forced to attend classes where they “learn not to rape”. That didn’t come out of nowhere, it came from the seed planted by the militant lesbians.
99.999999% of men do not need to be “taught” this, and the rest are actual rapists and don’t give a shit.
Dworkin’s been dead for years and was an oddity in the ’70s. Almost no one too her seriously. Why are you still referencing her? It seems lie an excuse to explain your misogynistic beliefs.
Which explains why men are forced to attend classes at college on “How not to rape”, more and more (look it up).
Misogynist means to hate women. Being against bad trends does not equate to hating women. Perhaps you should figure out that emotional appeals and ad hominem don’t work here.
Or not. Really, does it matter in the end?
We have posters all over the campus for Women’s Psychology, Women’s Studies, and Social Etiquette.
Only the best.
Adrienne Rich & the Lesbian Continuum. More subtle but riffing on the same hatred of mankind. Did you know her husband – you know before she became a lesbian out of hatred of men and created a movement designed to turn heterosexual women into women identifying women within a lesbian continuum of women identifying women, committed suicide in despair.
She’s also massively influential in academia and gender studies and one of the main reasons you get so much lesbian activism in feminism, on TV and media.
It’s the same stuff, just made sneakier and slightly more subtle
Makes me want to spit.
Fortunately I have my son who is attending college for mechanical engineering. Their “liberal arts” courses are almost non-existent. The one he’s been to he’s worn an anti-feminist t-shirt. From this came two things.
1) He got to debate loads of people and shut them down and
2) He got tons of hot young 18 and 19 year old chick followers who think he’s hot and who love that he goes against feminists.
I’m seeing nothing but win here.
I’m so proud of your son. You should be proud too. He is not a little pussy who spouts gibberish.
My college has posters in all the buildings, even hard science buildings. It feels like a hive. A fucking bee hive where we cannot upset our queen (female dean).
Of course, I offend them all for fun. I went around the other day with a long Slim Jim and asked girls if they had seen my meat stick. I will probably be arrested soon! I am too immature for my own good. Some girls loved the joke, though. So not all is lost. Some people still have a sense of humor.
Well done.
I can only add that I am extremely proud of how my son turned out.
Having a father who is around already set him up for success. Broken homes and single mothers are a recipe for disaster upon the mind of a child. Boys are affected the worse by the lack of a mentor. That is why I push for more male teachers.
Really! You must be a women right? https://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/
You must be an SJW freak.
Shaming tricks does not work pussy!
Yes they do you leg bearded troll.
mangina!
If the media types/SJWs weren’t so infantile and lazy, you wouldn’t have to post any of these (what are effectively rebuttals). I’m not in your shoes, but have to say that you shouldn’t stoop to explain yourself to any of the feminists/media/SJWs/manginas/white knights, et al. If they are incapable of reading through the archives of your websites, of grasping subtlety, of understanding satire, etc., then why would you bother to even respond to them? You are better than that and your body of experience and body of work frankly put you at a level where even deigning to give those people a response is frankly beneath you, Roosh. You know this, surely.
This.
We don’t debate the left. We destroy them.
They are not our intellectual equals therefore any attempt at rational discourse is lowering yourself.
Ignore or mock if you must engage them. Mockery is so easy with these people as they are walking caricatures of looney tunes.
If anything red pill men should be learning from Trump on how he engages his opposition.
Quit treating these insects like they are on your level. They are your enemies and they want you dead or locked up.
Bravo, sir.
I’d add a caveat though. Engage them IF you know that there is a lurking audience of people who might be swayed to your side. Use them as a foil, in a disinterested way, to demonstrate the superiority of your ideals and logic.
i’ve been calmly asking the white knights if they’re happy with the way
women and other men treat them. then i point out that i wasn’t until i
found ROK and learned how relationships between men and women actually
work. who knows, it could light a fire.
i’ve been ignoring the
women. among other things, i never heard that that had stopped being a
rule. i liked it better when we weren’t allowed to reply to women and
women who posted were blocked immediately.*
*relax, ladies.
nothing against you expressing your opinions. just not here please. we
can get women’s opinions pretty much everywhere else.
I’d argue that this article has brought in tons of guys who might be sympathetic towards neo-masculinity but up until now have never heard anything about it. Such guys would read this and see that they probably agree with or relate to nearly everything Roosh presents about himself.
Bam. New converts. 🙂
Under normal circumstances I’d agree, but they are literally trying to ruin the rest of Roosh’s life. The pathetic weenies in England, for example, seem awful fond of banning people they disagree with. It’s a very real possibility Roosh could be banned from traveling to several Western countries.
I think he needed to put this defense out there to protect himself.
Keep going roosh. Change the world
Three people approached me at work today. It was damage control for my reputation as they now think I read a rapist’s diary using a highlighter. The article in the Saint Pete Times was quite a hit piece. What Roosh has done is held up a mirror to society’s face. Unfortunately it didn’t see a thing. Amazing, if you think about it. If the meetup happened? Great. If the meetup does not happen and the manosphere becomes a top news story?
Priceless
It’s slowly sinking in that this is a war for society and culture
Unfortunately, we lost that war long before most of us reading this were born.
No war is lot until all combatants have surrendered.
Fuck if I surrender.
Not to take this to a dark place, but I think we need to have a “charge of the light brigade” sort of plan if Hillary wins the upcoming election. If Hillary wins, it’s game over for America, the west, and I daresay most of humanity. If we lose, we might as well go out in a blaze of glory and take a few leftists with us.
That charge led more men to be heroic after its report than imaginable.
I do agree with taking it to the bitter dregs. Better to be true to Light and Truth, than to surrender for the sake of survival.
There will be nothing left to fight for if Hillary wins. The left’s victory will be complete. Better to die a man I suppose than to live in the world she will create.
No win is ever absolute. The USSR fell. Every dictatorship has fallen, no exceptions. Even full bore communist China had that one man who stood in front of the tanks.
I know it sounds schmaltzy, but the human spirit, while being easily led to chains, is nearly impossible to be kept there.
Yes, the USSR fell. But it’s ideals lived on in the country that once fought against it. Socialism of some kind is almost guaranteed in this country in the future. I’m about the same age as your son, Ghost, and though I don’t know how colleges are in flyover country, if they’re anything like colleges on the east coast there’s a lot of brainwashing going on. I don’t know if our generation can ever really overcome it.
It’s going so fast now, they’re making a tactical mistake and pushing too fast. GenX, mostly libertarian, is still semi-young (40’s), and if we raised our kids right (flip of the coin) we have them as well.
Colleges on the east coast and in California mean nothing. They are and have been a lost cause since the 1960’s. Here in flyover country we have young men your age and younger who shoot guns and who have grown up hunting, and we have young girls learning to cook. Our hope lay in the middle.
Interesting aside: My daughter showed me her prom dress. It’s long, black and has no skin exposed except her shoulders. Her boyfriend, who shoots guns and hunts, is wearing a tux. My son, who owns 4 guns he bought on his own, approved. He’s followed by at least 4 very skinny girls who like that he is against feminism.
No hope? Pshaw, it’s where you look for it.
I’ve said before that if any hope for the future remains in this country, it lies in the Midwest. One thing I’ve been at odds with Roosh on has definitely been in regards to leaving the US. There are days when I think that it’s inevitable and that I’ll have to flee to a friendlier sphere (if there are any left by that time). But then I think “why the hell should I leave?” My family has lived in this country for four generations. Why should I have to leave it because a bunch of losers (and that’s what SJWs are, LOSERS) want to make life miserable for everyone else?
I do need to get out of the east coast, though, or at least the northeast (I’m in New Jersey). And California? I hope to never set foot in that hellhole unless it’s to satisfy a recording date at Capitol Records.
Yeah when I saw that the meetings were cancelled (though I suspected something was up when Roosh was making jokes about sneaking into Aus via yacht) I was thinking that this may come down to “get on the truck or else” and how our guns are going to have be become extensions of our hands to the bloody end (meaning, never give them up, ever). And this is because the hate we are up against is “death camp level”. These people would herd us into death camps if they could.
Of course, someone said “camps are so last century, make the world a camp and track and trace everything and everybody instead” and someone else said “Let’s work the men to death first” and so we get what we have right now.
C’mon mate
Don’t be such a defeatist
Haven’t we discussed going out back to back standing knee deep in brass with stacks of corpses around us?
*ahem* If Hillary wins, I suspect many will ~take aim~ and ~target~ the issue. In such a situation it’s always best to have the correct ~ammunition~ to defend oneself from the agenda being forced on them. If lucky, one might even score a ~headshot~ in the vigorous political debates to come.
Ideas are bullet proof
Very true. My parents remember the days when a picture of “Stalin forever alive” was in every classrom. Where is Stalin now ? The opression of the left will also reach a breaking point. I do not know when or how, but they will fall.
…walking on eggshells there bud
Well stated. The media here (Facebook, Pam Geller, Drudge Report) started going in on you yesterday…the whole ‘legalizing rape’ thing is an attempt by the enemy to define you and paint you in a corner, so you will have to get out ahead of it. I think you should do a speaking tour starting here in the states and get a publicist (and lets face it, a blood thirsty lawyer) to cut the feminazi’s and SJW’s off at the knees and get the world out that you are a neomaculinist.
You might consider that rape is not an issue to ‘satire’.
There’s a thought. If you decide to write something like that which is clearly click-bait, you have to deal with the consequences.
“X is not an issue to satire” – Ministry of Truth
das es verboten!!!
The media is attempting to destroy Roosh for comments taken completely out of context, while actively engaged in covering up the actual rapes of thousands of women in every white nation on earth by millions of invading immigrants.
Seriously, how could anybody be as brainwashed as these idiotic feminists?
They would have to be trying!
Amazing isn’t it, that they can walk around pretending like they are not being the world’s biggest hypocrites, while thousands of White women all over the world are being raped EVERY SINGLE DAY due to policies that are DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE to feminist leftists.
They’re not brainwashed. They know exactly what they’re doing. We will never vote for government programs to pay for their hypergamic desires. The imported orcs will, until of course the orcs gain control.
Remember most journalists these days are not your average working / middle class Joe or Jane the learned it as a trade in Community College to distribute unbiased information to the masses. Those are dead or retired with a few still remembering the 70’s and 80’s when you kept your opinion out of most articles and you didn’t approach the news with an agenda. That was the “Opinion Section.”
That is long gone.
The 4th Estate is now populated by wealthy people’s children with connections to get them in. Newspapers etc are almost entirely owned corporately, not family as in the past, so won’t print anything to offend advertisers. As circulation has collapsed, media sources multiply daily and papers become so corporate that the locals are little more than add rags.
In this context anything out of the collective narrative must be destroyed. Once we “tune in and turn on” they can’t be brainwashed anymore the media, and the state especially, here in Canada fears that..
This is a whole other thread!
The 1770s and 1780s.
The term romantic means you believe things were better in the times of rome. They weren’t.
The reaction our mayor had to Roosh’s planned meet ups must be illegal he tweeted that rapists are not welcome in our town and will not be allowed to meet in any government building. He then tweeted that any establishments in the area should not serve these men if they come to your establishment. I mean, it’s 1984 here and everyone is just smiling about it.
Yes, people on the left actually WANT 1984.
I’m seeing Roosh and ROK everywhere today – BBC news website, the New Yorker….everywhere. Money could not buy this sort of publicity.
The scary thing is, that all these sources call ROK a Pro Rape Group, and people are taking that at face value without doing ANY research to back up what the media tells them. Forgetting ROK; the scary thing is how gullible the average person seems to be.
The latest ROK related post I saw was on Facebook, regarding women boxers that were going to show up and beat the shit out of the men attending – the replies were full of people thrilled at the idea of men getting beaten up/ Does nobody see the hypocrisy in this? Glee at the thought of harming others?
If I were Roosh, I’d be afraid for my safety. The idiotic masses know his face and all it takes is one crowd of people to spot him and say to themselves ‘there’s that rapist guy’, for him to be in real trouble. He is in danger because of a media-constructed lie.
The funny part is that if those men beat the shit out of those female boxers, and they would, it would be an outrage.
The women I’ve boxed with in the ring are often all talk. Easy to talk big when you’re thousands of miles away.
Boxing with a woman, sorry just have to laugh a bit. I know they won’t take no for an answer but it really shows how out of touch with reality they are. It must have been like boxing a child, where they hit you and go down and beg for mercy. Ha ha.
The picture of all them has to be a joke . The chick on the far left looks like she’s maybe had one class
They would’ve been all talk anyways. I’m no great fighter but I’ve boxed several female professionals and several olympians (including a silver medalist) and I touched them up bad. If any of them had decided to turn the volume up, they would’ve gone down.
It’s just posturing to get YouGoGrrrrrrl! attention.
One of the things I’ve learned (though I’ve always suspected it) since joining this site, is that the average person is almost retarded.
One of the things I’ve learned is that the average person coming out of university is retarded.
almost?
Not completely. They function, they can shop in Walmart and such.. but higher functions are disabled.
Fair enough then, just a little dispute over semantics lol… see ladies – its not that hard to get along
The enemy is gaming it all hard. SJW’s are wind up zombies always ready to be activated. Anything to stir chaos and bring in jack boot force or more draconian orders against men in general. The forces trying to wrest control of our species away from our males are surely alien forces.
This it the worst bit – the Facebook replies were along the lines of “oh my god, I didn’t know there was such a thing as a Pro Rape Group!” – they knew it sounded ridiculous but just believed what they were told. They honestly believe that there are groups of people from this site looking to meet up to try and rape women.
There’s a language barrier, but there should be some responses that can be google translated of syrian mobs conspiring to attack and rape white women. It’s absurd how the fems and sjw’s miss or forget the ‘rape hoardes’ in Europe. It’s almost like a a big ploy to exclude white women from mating with their own race but at the same time giving syrian and somali mongrel hoardes the green light to sack the west. I’m embarrased for whites that succumb to the brainwash but I’m also concerned how effective and powerful the whole brain screw operation is. I feel safe from it, but how can so many become brain zapped so easily? Ok, I downed my ginko and focus factor this morning, but the weak mindedness that I see out and about is troubling.
“It’s almost like a a big ploy to exclude white women from mating with their own race”
Yeah….haha…ALMOST.
White women LOVE non-White rapists. The proof is everywhere to see. They didn’t say a single negative word about the Muslim rapists in Germany in Sweden.
What these liars really hate is WHITE MEN. Period, end of story. This is just good old-fashioned racism.
Let’s not forget about what happened in Rotherham.
Leave that to the refugee centers that the public so adores.
Totally, these feminists are cannibalizing their own race, fools.
Satire is a tricky form of comedy. Some people get it immediately while others never understand. However, the satirical comments will always be used against you. Your enemies know that the masses will not research the context of your words. Ignorance is their weapon.
You are a charisma teacher, and a self-esteem booster. You teach men how to adapt to the ever changing environment in which they live and reproduce.
Satire is not necessarily comedy. We think that it is because leftist buffoons use cheap laughs to trick you into believing their Socialist messages. But some of the best satire ridicules foolish ideas without trying to be funny about it.
The phrase “let’s legalize rape!” is just so comical.
Has there every been any one person and/or group that seriously pushed that agenda? To me, it’s akin to saying “legalize murder!”
I can’t think of anyone, man or woman, that would take me seriously if I walked up to them and tried to convince them that rape is a good idea, let alone, that rape should be LEGAL.
The fact that so many people read those headlines and didn’t once stop to think “hm… this sounds just a LITTLE silly.. maybe I should investigate this further” greatly saddens me.
Common sense is dead.
Feminists have not only proposed, they have had some success in making it legal for a wife to murder her husband in cold blood.
They laugh and cackle at the idea of a man’s genitals being mutilated, so I am not shocked.
You might actually get some traction if you were to start pushing for murder. Just look at all the threats posted in the previous articles.
Well, if we just rename it something positive, then the problem goes away, right?
It’s not “sodomy” – it’s “another form of love”
It’s not “censorship” – it’s “being considerate of other’s feelings on threat of force”
It’s not “insanity” – it’s “otherkin” or “trans-something-ism”
By that logic, maybe…
It’s not “murder” – it’s “X-trimesters-post-extraction abortion”
It’s not “rape” – it’s…I dunno…”overriding display of love” or something…
More examples include:
It’s not “racism” – it’s “opposition to oppressive systems and privilege”
It’s not “sexism” – it’s “opposition to patriarchal norms”
#killallmen is not a “death threat” – it’s “venting”
It’s not “misandry” – it’s “feminism”
It’s not “genocide” – it’s “removing unwanted/dangerous/evil populations from society”
I’m pretty sure the equalists know Roosh isn’t actually advocating legalized rape
They just have a propensity towards moral outrage – same they reason they believe in equality in the first place
But…Islam promotes legal rape….And honestly I wish that was a joke.
they remind me of the “mothers against drunk driving” people. like theres groups out there who are for drunk driving…
common sense is indeed dead
So you’ve given up reducing rapes against our mothers sisters and daughters, because legalizing rape was the only means of achieving it.
Eeh . . well for me, divorce rape is the big hot button issue. More good men, responsible loving fathers are crucified daily in the west by the insideous divorce rape industry.
The lynch mob who threatened to kill and torture Roosh, his fans, and even his parents over a false story of “misogyny” are exactly the kind of people who would have beaten and murdered Emmett Till a few generations ago.
No they’re the ones who a few generations ago would forget to mention till was the son of a convicted rapist. Actual rape rapist.
Well if anything certainly the internet hate machine got to do some work out this week
http://i.imgur.com/oSkOZtw.jpg
Pointlessly funny
Sheer genius
I almost shit myself laughing at your comic! Well done man, you should do up a comic book or something!
Genius
HOLY SHIT!! XD
Blah blah blah. Apologetic article. Admit it – you got intimidated by SJWs. They won this time. Now make sure that such a humiliation won’t happen again.
Did they now?
Yeah man, I don’t see it this way at all.
They did win BUT at the same time, I think you guys want to have an undefeated season every year and win the World Series. Of course you should go into every season with this mindset. The Yankees do it and consider their level of success. The next game is coming up and so you need to get ready for it. We have the pitching, we have the bullpen, we have the hitting (they understand the concept of patience at the plate), our infield is tight, and our outfield is full of studs.
Get your mind right. Suit up. Get in between those lines and win. Every time we take the field the SJWs shit their pants. When you hit that home run, stare at the ball before taking that first step on your home run trot. And when you trot, stare at the pitcher. We’ve done it before. Every year is 1998 and the SJWs are the San Diego Padres.
You should have used the Red Sox or Patriots as your example. 😛
We sometimes lick out wounds, but this has been successful. The site traffic is up and meetings will still take place. In fact, some met today. They were not stopped.
The SJWs are not the Red Sox in no way, shape, or form. The Red Sox would have beaten the Padres but the Yankees beat the Red Sox and the Padres. The SJWs are paper tigers. In fact, the cancellation was not a championship game. It was not a playoff game. It was a three game series during the regular season against the Rays, at best. I used the Padres as an example because they got swept.
The SJWs are not the brightest people but I’m not telling you anything new. And I am going to my meet up also.
No, I meant we should be the Red Sox and Patriots. 😀
Patriots dominate and Red Sox always bounce back.
Roosh will have his Superbowl. These harpies cannot mobilize like he can. He is basically always on the move. They are pinned down like the pigs they are.
In my opinion, we are past the “bounce back” concept. As I said earlier, we want to have an undefeated season and a championship. What happened was not a playoff loss, it was a regular season loss, nothing more. We are still well above .500. The SJWs are celebrating because they are at the bottom of the division and managed to pull out a win. Don’t give the SJWs any undeserving credit. Their gameplay still sucks. Besides, the tough games will come later in the schedule when we play the cucks.
Good point. We cannot lose sight of the future battles. SJWs can mourn the fact that the only chance they ever had at stopping us is forever gone.
Oh yeah, he is quivering over there. Yep, all this attention is just so terrible. He never had this happen before, right?
That’s exactly it, pal. It was low whispers before, but might as well be blunt: the “coward’s way” out was taken, and frankly, it’s unbecoming of men. I read someone say the wisest thing: that there simply ought to have been a warning, yet **no** cancellation … “i.e. RoK cannot guarantee your safety, etc. but proceed at your own risk in your respective cities”. Let the members decide, and separate the boys from the men, instead of cutting-and-running like this:
https://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://coward.politifake.org/image/political/1202/backbone-sarkozy-france-president-politics-coward-politics-1329361980.jpg&imgrefurl=http://coward.politifake.org/tags/coward&h=554&w=640&tbnid=–DjRZWI6NBk_M&tbnh=209&tbnw=241&usg=__pvg9LI6CHxC6r4CuUUMaFEfkr54=&hl=en-CA&docid=svABA0NPs7NCDM
or this: http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000344633/polls_cartoon_coward_4401_659944_answer_1_xlarge.jpeg
@roosh You should make a point to mention the Amber Amour rape story and how it relates to this…
keep it up roosh. Can you add NZ to the list with Canada, UK, Australia? That’s another SJW, feminist hell hole. The left wing mob would be the same people that lynched and killed the prophets in antiquity. They just obey their sheep masters and blindly follow them even if it’s all lies.
Yeah you poor bastards in NZ, its the only place worse than Australia.
@roosh You should make a point to mention the Amber Amour rape story and how it relates to this
Who else has noticed that Roosh is willing to charge into Toronto or Australia when it’s his safety on the line, but he calls off the meetups when credible threats are raised against his readership?
That’s a man who cares about his tribe, and the tribe acknowledges it.
Exactly, he’s a class act and it’s showing under all this pressure from the Left. The guy just needs to re group, call one of his many hot woman, have them release the pressure and come back in full form.
Amen to this. The true test of a man is whether he stands up for his people. My door is open, Roosh. Warm beer and cold steaks anytime. (This was a real highway sign near where I grew up.)
I would go even further…get a lawyer, organize as a 501(c)…even better, as a church. You can joke about it but Mohammed has his followers, and Jesus had 12 Apostles, and Buddha had his disciples…and while I think this is no where near a cult of personality, once organized as a Church, things like “don’t oppress my religious expression” come into play. And Roosh is a leg up on other spiritual leaders…no hidden golden disks, no secret manifesto’s about wingless DC-8’s dumping space aliens into nuked volcano’s, and no annoying folk at airports with chanting and singing 😉
There’s no need for a new church. When Roosh’s views align with the Biblical view of sex, he’ll have the whole church on side. A lot of his personal grief could have been avoided if he affirmed and promoted the Biblical view: that Christian marriage is God’s consent to sex and that a husband and wife should not abstain from sex except for a short time in prayer.
If you’re talking about most Christian denominations that’s gonna be a very small group of people.
Most churches in the west stopped teaching Christianity eons ago. They’re more into repackaging leftist “churchianity” and passing it off as the Gospel of Christ.
Damn right bro. 90% of them
I was of course referring to the Bible-believing church, not the church of church. There’s clearly a difference. It’s a smaller group but it’s certainly not “small”. People will find them if they know their Bible and act accordingly. The others don’t matter.
Another point is that the media and slimy politicians like the mayors of Ottawa and Toronto would capitalize on this to do a “told you so” kind of narrative. The meet ups just must go on in private, for now….
I was thinking the same thing. I love the responsibility that he is showing. Instead of pushing us all into the dragons lair, he realises it might pose a real danger to us, and calls it off. This is why I completely trust the guy.
But next time we should all be able to see danger ahead and don’t rush into it…we can’t rely on the leaders each time.
I have to agree with you. That kind of leadership is seldom found in this era. This is the first time I have posted on the board, though I have been reading for about months. After this debacle, and having to endure SJWs, feminists, and socialists while living in the wrong part of Texas, I realized I couldn’t stand back and observe any longer.
Amen brother.
He said he would, but didn’t. And we are all responsible for our own safety.
Good the hear from you! Fuck these sjw swine! When do we try this again. And, humbly, when we do I highly suggest that we coordinate with the alternative media. Paul Joseph Watson did a short video on you today. Between him and Alex, plus, others in that space we can leverage their outreach to control the narrative.
Yes, it has to be a co-ordinated effort … think Operation Overlord meets Operation Barbarossa!
Wow just checked the French media and you are described as a pro-rape
activist! This is really crazy. You have now become a world celebrity…
I hope that this will lead people to this website and that many of them
will become enlightened… but I don’t have much hope. Sadly I think
the majority of people won’t try to dig further than what the media is
serving them. Plus sad to say but also for some Europeans that don’t
know you, they will label you as middle-eastern and immediately make the
connection with Köln. Unfair but likely.
http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2016/02/04/01016-20160204ARTFIG00167-les-meetings-anti-feministes-du-blogueur-roosh-v-interdits.php There should be a “press review” article to list all the mentions of the meetups..
Figaro are french cucks.
Roosh you started something here that isn’t going to stop, you are definitely bearing the brunt of the lies, slander, and overall attacks no doubt. Just remember for every 1,000 of these pathetic, weak, feminist harpies out to get you, you have ten quality men at your side waiting to defend which is worth far more than a million feminists. Thank you for all your hard work on the site, it has really helped me gain perspective and confidence.
..and one woman..
@[email protected] unacceptable!
😛
Glad you are here. People tend to generalize a lot.
Actually there are quite a lot…
…and one gay guy.
Just for anyone who might like fact checking in general:
http://www.snopes.com/roosh-v-43-countries/
Another excerpt from Roosh’s article: “I knew from an early age that rape was bad, as was all forms of violence, not just against women but men as well.” Full article here: http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
Men and women coming here in rages, please understand you have been lied to by your media, likely your government by proxy or extension, is that who you are? What you represent? All that blind hatred based on manipulating your good will? This is one of those moments in your life that really matter.
We know why the rank and file SJWs and modern Feminists are upset and it has nothing to do with rape since they are well aware it has never been advocated here. Don’t be their lapdogs, you can choose, right now, to be better than that.
Well written. Upvoted in hopes that this becomes top-of-page material.
As is typical Snopes gets the facts wrong.
Apparently Snopes does not get the concept of satire either.
I’m Roosh.
And so the slave uprising begins…
I said it earlier on another page but I’ll say it again here because I think it’s worth repeating:
It’s been two days since this went public and there’s still a shitstorm on social media. What’s even funnier is the rabid response to people who don’t agree with Roosh, but respect his right to free speech and for members to assemble peacefully.
I have a question: boxers, briefs or commando?
The comments by Jim Watson, the mayor of Ottawa, were totally irresponsible and out of line.
When he wrote “Your pro-rape, misogynistic, homophobic garbage is not welcome in Ottawa” he essentially incited and encouraged mob retribution against law abiding citizens because he didn’t like what we said.
Having not read one article on the site, unable to cite one law or, ROK, ROOSH or the meetup groups are, were or in violation of, Jim Watson feels himself omnipotent as the “Mayor of Ottawa” to decide who can meet and say what in Ottawa.
Never mind the Charter of Rights and Freedoms say under “Fundamental Freedoms” Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
sec 2 “(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
Goebbles would be proud of this blatant lie!
Jim Watson could not get laid on death row in a womens prison with a hand full of pardons from the Prime Minister. He’s just sad he has no equiptment
tell a lie big enough………
The medias basically sentenced us to death. You don’t call someone a rapist without expecting a lynchmob to form itself.
I hope we have wanted posters with outrageous rewards for our death or capture.
So which one of us will play Blondie, and which one will play Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez?
I was saying to someone on the other page – you know the one with 5.5k comments on it and rising – that Roosh’s article could be seen as an example of consequentialism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism
I wonder if there any professional philosophers of ethics who would risk their arses to comment on this. Personally, I’m not sure it would reduce the incidence of rape, and obviously people find it unacceptable, but even one rejects that particular argument for reducing the incidence of rape, would a different but formally similar one be legitimate: i.e. one that ignored the ‘women / men have a right not to be raped’ argument but instead considered what kind of situation (legal or otherwise) would produce less rape.
Imprisoning, castrating all men would probably be popular amongst feminism, but in principle if people are really serious about creating a society which is safer for women and safer for men as well perhaps I think the issue of promoting both female responsibility AND male responsibility is worth pursuing. The idea that its only down to men, and women can do anything they want is simple infantilism on the part of women. Sex is negotiation, and needs to be treated maturely by both parties.
If we leave aside the specific article, and the radical feminist chainsaw solution maybe it is not illlegitimate to start talking about men and women actually sharing responsibility on this issue, rather than it being just down to men. The point to take away from this is that a consequentialist perspective is probably the right one. Roosh is right: feminism IS endangering women. It’s doing the equivalent of telling them they have a right not to look right and left when they cross the road. That is a recipe for disaster and feminism needs to be held to account for that, just as it needs to be held to account for looking the other way with regard to the real danger presented by refugees some of whom (maybe a minority but a significant minority nonetheless) who seem to think its genuinely ok to molest or even rape women.
Again this is what gets missed when society plays politics as a function of ideology rather than as something that requires reality orientation. The article is flawed certainly (and yeah, maybe a tad offensive) but the consequentialism and the principle of personal responsibility it promotes should not be. People should be talking about this and not giving into a feminism that is a danger to everyone
This is an excellent idea worth exploring, and I very much appreciate your comments. However, attempts at reasoned discourse are utterly wasted on unreasonable ideologues. Unfortunately, there is only one way to deal with the left. See Breitbart’s interview with Milo today.
Thanks, I do think there’s a principal to salvage here, but it will be a fight. Cologne etc is potentially a game changer: feminism cannot keep women safe because it is not reality-oriented. Male + female responsibility can.
I’ll check out the link – Milo’s always a hoot
The ethics I grew up with were more duty-bound and didn’t allow all means no matter how desirable the goal. For the rape proposition, that doesn’t matter; I’m amazed how seriously people really take such stuff. I think the article was a commentary on our recent social combination of reckless innovation with zero tolerance. We have hooking-up culture lubricated by suds; then toss the young man in prison forever should anything go wrong in the frat house. That’s what RAINN and the femmie camp want. It’s ridiculous. And sure, Muslim North Africans are human beings and they suffer; we must not turn a blind eye; therefore we must open the floodgate regardless of whether the influx will swamp our country’s capacity to assimilate newcomers. The reality that Africans must build higher living standards at home if they want them is ignored. I don’t understand it well, suspecting we have jettisoned moderation. The PC and feminist, anticolonial, antiracist movements drew lots of valid points about the seamy side of Western civilizations when they first came out about 60 years ago. But since then, they have romped onto more arrogant saddles as they disregard that rights do come with attendant responsibility.
yeah, I grew up within a context duty ethics / deontology. I was brought up as a Christian, golden rule and all that, and was quite influenced by Kant. I still think duty ethics is important, but the problem with it, particularly the kantian – categorical imperative – side of it is that it tends to universalise what should be done. In PC / progressive hands that tends to mean something quite totalitarian. Everyone must live with the maxim that ‘rape can never be the woman’s fault’ – well as a rule of thumb that makes for a better world. Blaming the victim for her own rape is perverse, and is what many backward society still do, but in the hands of progressive automatons that means that all responsibility for establishing consent must be the man’s and there is zero responsibility for anything on the woman’s part. There are a hundred other ways in which duty ethics mangled into inflexible principles – usually in the form of idiotic soundbites that can be daubed on a banner – fails when it meets the real world.
Its time to look at works for both men and women, and that means re-visiting the real world
The sheer vindictiveness developing in multiculturalism is what I think makes it dangerous in the long run. The “blaming the victim” mantra is a canard. I already accept that the woman isn’t to blame if she’s raped. But even a duty ethic does not call for unconscionably harsh judgment. If there is a problem with domineering sex (a thing I’m not sure how often is the case), then we need proportionate discipline for it. While a few weeks in the slammer followed by a formal apology might be appropriate, the penalty for a non-injury rape in a college setting between dating 18-year olds cannot be years in a prison filled with hardened criminals (and with certain lifetime loss of career) as RAINN demanded in its open letter to Pres. Obama. And we have quit counseling women on the importance of modest dress and defensive behavior, a thing that goes for men as well.
college sex is nothing more than an ideological battle ground. There’s no possibility of justice prevailing in such situations, and that’s thanks to feminism, which is deliberately poisoning the emotional and sexual lives of young men and women. Domineering sex is not illegal, and may be desired by young women, however it will be increasingly difficult for young couples to engage in sexual relations that they may want but which may put the female in a difficult situation vis a vis feminist theory, and the myriad rape activists who try to persuade women retrospectively that bad and even good, but perhaps not gentle sex is actually rape. In a situation like that only women taking back responsibility for their own decision-making can repair things, and only then if feminism is turfed out of campus for good. It may well require men to take rape and consent seriously but not on feminist terms but on terms negotiated with young women on the assumption that they are adults who take responsibility for themselves
I agree that a relationship should be negotiated in explicit terms by both parties, in advance. Preferably after a few dates without sexual activity, or even after knowing each other a year, as was norm at one time. The definition for rape is extremely vague; force or threat is always an element, but can’t be quantified, so you never know if a therapist will pull a rape rabbit out of the hat. Valerie Solanas (ca. 1968), who characterized men as sperm vectors whom society could dispose of entirely once artificial reproduction was invented, was perhaps a seminal generator of militancy in the feminist movement. The political juggernaut can’t be stopped because colleges need those Title IX funds; so they’re gonna have this new rape investigation bureaucracy in parallel with law enforcement and put it on your tuition tab. I used to have some feminist sympathies, when this was about rights to equal opportunity in the workplace. But it’s turned into a cancer now.
“I agree that a relationship should be negotiated in explicit terms by both parties, in advance”
I have to say that’s the just giving in to feminism’s idea of ‘affirmative consent’ which is simply impossible for real human beings in real human relationships to manage. Sex can work like that, sure, and maybe in this day and age its the correct policy for men in particular to follow, but overall it creates an impossible standard that will simply result in the vast majority of relationships entering into the grey area of illegality because they got caught up in the moment, or because they didn’t have the latest issue of the Feminist Bulletin to hand. Affirmative Consent has to go, but equally taking consent seriously is a reasonable concern in any realm of human interaction.
The political juggernaut re. Title IS is indeed very powerful at present. A lot may depend on whether Hillary or someone like Trump gets in, although the way things are these days, even Trump would probably appease the feminist mafia
That’s where the little word “negotiated” comes in. Affirmative consent, far from a two-party negotiation, runs totally one-sided, and stretched to include revocation of consent after the fact. So blatantly the constitution keeps it out of criminal law although students can still get expelled over it in California. Advance arrangements may be unrealistic in the USA by now, as you said: Losing the training of a whole generation after the sexual revolution was costly in some ways. I’m a bit old school. People fooled around in my day, but getting caught meant you got in trouble unless you were 21+ and out of the parents’ home. The morals now, which I have no power to alter, don’t offer a whit of deterrent effect.
Donald Trump shoots from the hip, telling people like it is. If he does win, he’ll have to backpedal—Mexico isn’t going to pay for that wall, and neither will Congress. He may not actively appease the Mother Superior of Feminism, but he will have to avoid directly challenging Her, if only to conserve his limited political capital for the crucial economic battles. I have to say that despite enjoying Trump’s showboat ride up the Mississippi, I’m pretty much for Rubio right now, because we need a level head with chances against Clinton in November. The media trashing has compromised the Trumpster with voters that, demographically, the GOP just can’t forego, a thing his spat with Megyn Kelly on Fox didn’t help. While Cruz overamps on religion to a ridiculous extent.
sure, negotiated definitely. I’m not too sure about the word ‘explicit’ though – I agree it may be necessary in practice because that’s the reality of the world we live in right now, but that doesn’t mean the principle should be conceded – for the most part its unworkable, and creates an impossible standard. Consent needs to be established. If its someone you don’t know that well, then explicit may well be the best way to go i.e. as a pragmatic necessity, but defining how consent happens – as affirmative consent tries to do – is merely a recipe for creating rapists by definition only if you see what I mean
I think you’re right about Trump. He talks the talk, and would probably be a good president for the most part, but particularly because he’s been called out as a sexist, including with regard to Megan Kelly, he will have to appease the feminist establishment.
So Roosh, if I walk into a bar and a psycho girl calls me a rapist, and I calmly explain to her how I am not a rapist with diagrams, etc, have I passed the shit test?
Yes you have! She will consent to leave with and be used like a hand puppet by you..
Why are you approaching psychos?
A shit test is one thing, but never put your dick in crazy.
Psychos don’t wear signs on their foreheads. And for the record the crazy girls do fuck the best.
Maybe, but psychos are also more likely to hit you with a false rape accusation. There are a few articles on that here, and some really good ones by AV Yader.
And then she can be charged with hate speech.
Calling someone a rapist is like yelling racial epithets.
Screw this “hate speech” nonsense, we need to grow thicker skin not silence other people.
Get ready Roosh to be parodied on southpark and family guy. Also brush up on some quick comebacks. An SNL plug or hosting spot is likely in the works for you soon.
Roosh vs PC Principal.
Fight, fight, fight
SNL has always been pretty leftist, I doubt they would want him on the show. I can see them mocking him though, maybe that’s what you meant.
South Park/Family Guy has some red pill undertones most of the time, maybe they will mock the media.
You’re a boring guy that gets laid for a living, and these doofuses can’t buy your screeds fast enough- which makes you clever and probably, a millionaire. I didn’t know your name 3 days ago. This is a cult-the cult of Roosh. These doofuses want to be you. Kaching! $$$$
Exactly, $$$$. Once those dollars start flowing in. So will support.
Of course, a lot of money comes from web traffic like that which sent our newcomer here. Certainly more global interest is generated this way as well.
I don’t think the Web traffic generates that much revenue, I’d say it’s the book sales. Trust me, Roosh is hunkered down right now thinking about how to turn this kerfuffle into gold.
As long as you keep clicking it shouldn’t be too hard for him to make a buck. Thanks for the contribution to his bankroll.
Yes, it’s fascinating how he has branded himself. Think about it, there is nothing extraordinary about Roosh: he is average looking at best. He writes fairly well, but so do many others. What he’s done is stepped outside of a conventional 9 to 5 life, to preach and live an ideology that taps into the natural insecurities and anger inside of men, gives them a vocabulary and a purpose. As an outsider looking in, he has the power and magnetism of a cult leader. He’s also turned it into a lucrative revenue stream. Pretty good.
Sounds extra-ordinary to me. This isn’t a cult however much I keep that idea. There is absolutely no pressure to agree with anything that isn’t to your taste. Many subscribe to all the main ideas. Most don’t, including to be honest myself on a couple of issues. But there is a core of great value here – at least to men who are re-examing their lives. A lot of people hate that, and would hate it even if there had never been a ‘legal rape’ article or whatever its being called. You should also read some of his other articles they’re not bad at all. I wish had Roosh’s entrepreneurial initiatve.
But don’t worry we’re not going Jim Jones on the world. That would please to many people
Yes, I cannot deny his success. Cults do not have to pressure or restrict their followers, iN this case it’s voluntary. He is selling sex and dominance, among other things. Really fascinating.
What exactly is wrong with sex and dominance? It’s win-win for everyone.
Interesting. I think you’re opinion that ROK is a cult is less analysis and more an attempt at rhetoric / psychology. What you haven’t accounted for is the fact that those who know Roosh and ROK from visiting the site know that the world has suddenly and unfairly turned against him. To defend against bullshit and hostile attack is a natural reaction not a cultic one. This circus has turned into a show about Roosh, whereas he’s usually far more of a background presence
On the hand feminism. Now that is a cult if ever there was one: selling sexual power through denial. ‘Reach for the stars ladies, you can do anything you put your minds too!” and then leveraging the inevitable failure of that prediction by turning into into the fault of the male sex. Not sure whether you’re a feminist but if you are you might want to look to your own hierophants and cult leaders, because today’s women are as possessed by feminism as much as that girl in the Exorcist was possessed by the daemon of green bile
Fuck off. Seriously. First, learn basic definitions. You couldn’t even define a “cult” if your life depended on it, you moron. There is no “sell”, you retard. This site is more-or-less a congregation of like-minded men who share ideas and engage in fruitful discussions. Who are you to tell us what it’s all about, you retarded sarcastic prick?
The fag has spoken. All hail the fag.
Jeez, you’re dumb. Can we swap the word “straw” in your acronym for “dick”?
He speaks again!
Hey listen, insults don’t bother me. You-all fascinate me.
And again!
What can we do for you, oh lord?
What does the Lord of all Fags wish of us?
Maybe you are asexual but we are not and find getting laid anything but “boring.” A cult does not empower it’s members to better themselves physically and intellectually as individuals.
I will concede this: your avatar reminds me of that creepy tranny serial killer in Silence of the Lambs!
I bet you find Bruce Jenner heroic.
This mentally bereft onanist is right! Stop giving Roosh money. Donate it instead to “Save the unborn gay baby whales” or “legal aid for rapefugees” instead.
Everyone has to make a living, right? That doesn’t change the fact that he is fighting for a meaningful cause
Well, meaningful to believers. Listen, I wouldn’t deny the power of whatever it is he has been able to tap into. He is a kind of marketing genius. Imagine, affording his lifestyle is enabled by marketing his lifestyle- having sex with strangers around the world.
Oh, but when the Kardashian girls do it, that’s “empowering”.
You should check out instagram sometime and see the HUGE number of women posting pics of their ass on there. Women are just naturally sluts, but now they can market their ass on instagram to afford some red-bottom shoes.
You are pulling rationalizations and arguments out of your ass. It is so obvious. Give it up. There is no cult. It’s all about the individualism. This is something you do not grasp but that is not your fault. You’ve been trained to think this way. I pity you.
Individualism? Well, you’re entitled to your opinion. You-all use the same jargon, express identical thoughts to the manifestos on Roosh’s site. Hey, I’m a libertarian, I really don’t give a shit but find you all fascinating. Like I said, I never heard of Roosh 3 days ago.
You are not a libertarian. Stop lyin’. Leave now before you get called out. I’m trying to help you out. By the way, “you’re welcome.”
Call me out, or whatever you want. Don’t care. The cult dynamic is fascinating. I applaud Roosh, he has created a revenue stream that will keep pumping as long as battle of the sees lasts.
The mere fact that you are characterizing people with a pejorative, the term “cult”, shows that you have no grasp of the concept of voluntary association and the principles founded upon such. There is nothing libertarian about you. Once again, you are liar. At best, you are characterizing yourself as “libertarian” with no idea of the meaning of that label. Those are the only two possibilities. Which of the two applies to you?
You are a faux libertarian and, in your case, that would be a generous complement. The truth however is that you are full of shit and unable to support any of your claims. I’m going to run out to the liquor store and get some beer. If I get fucked up enough, you might gain the ability of selling me on your nonsense. Be. Right. Back.
I’ve seen leftists use this tactic before, most notably Bill Maher and The Young Turks. They label themselves as “libertarian” to publicize their support for degenerate lifestyles, yet turn around and wail about “inequality” and “privilege.” It’s a load of crock, a disguise meant to appease their liberal fellows while appearing to meet conservatives in the middle. Ask a “libertarian” whether she supports abolishing the EOC, eliminating the income tax, eliminating affirmative action, getting rid of welfare, maternity leave, and equal pay bullshit. Real libertarians wouldn’t go near a protest designed to silence their opposition. These libertarians believe they are worthy of that label because they support sodomy, narcotics, and baby murder. A true libertarian knows that “equality” is a myth.
Exactly! Liberals, leftists, and progressives seem to be floating the “I’m a libertarian” disguise as a trial balloon. It’s possible they are trying to find a new label to wear because they’e worn thin the other labels they’ve used. The term “progressive” is showing signs of wear and they’ll soon need to find another one. At this point, “socialist” is radioactive and even though this is what they are, they have to find a “new” label that does not carry the baggage. “Libertarian” is en vogue at the moment and so they are trying to co-opt that term but merely as a disguise.
This hullaballo over the site is going to get Roosh so much more ass!!!! He is one cagey guy.
This article is fun 😀
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35490223
”Was the episode concocted to generate maximum publicity for the group’s controversial views? Did a master troll take the media and politicians for a ride?”
Yes sir.
I like how the crazy feminist lady in Australia thinks there were “threats” made: “OMG, a group of our own local Australian men might come drink some beer in our bars! Run!”
So much for my childhood fantasy that Australia was anything like Crocodile Dundee, damn you Paul Hogan! Damn you…
The sad part is the headline, “How ROK used outrage to sell…”
ROK, right, not the original story that all the other outlets including the BBC colluded with rather than fact check, nope, ROK. Maybe they can sell this garbage to the remaining folks who haven’t yet figured out the media’s lies in this, but they’ve done plenty of damage to themselves in recent days.
Wanted a location. I enjoy the articles on the website. I wanted to Attend the meeting in my area. I want to know when the meetings are resceduled. Now it’s all canceled and I’m past the cutoff date so I have no comments or book receipts to send in. Can anyone help me out here? BTW , I’ve spent hours reading articles on this site. I specifically searched “rape” and “legal”. There is ZERO postings on this site advocating rape. The uneducated backlash of people on here only further proves the message this site is trying to spread. Guys, ROK, followers, don’t engage in feminist, swear filled, name calling with these people. It takes credibility away from our message. People listen to roosh because he’s well spoken.
You guys are dwelling too much on this minor disappointment. That is all it is, a disappointment, and it is, at best, minor (and that’s giving too much credit). However, this video is for the neomasculinites. The first 1:06 is all you need to gain perspective.
Lol this is better than “DO IT!” xD
fuck.
Hi Graft. What made you change your mind?
I found an efficient way to organize.
Yeah? Why so covert about it?
Hoboken sounds ROK friendly compared to Porland/Seattle, Toronto, Austin. Someone should gather all the death threat posts and compile a SJW map of hot spots to avoid or wear body armour. Toronto vs Coeur d’Alene Idaho is like the difference between night and day.
No death threats in Hoboken. That’s my town. Hey, all threats should be taken seriously, but don’t you think the rhetoric has gotten way overheated ?
The overheated rhetoric ain’t coming from here. I’ve been reading the counter protest commentaries, and they are infested with folk who seek to use violence to disrupt a peaceful gathering. You need to be over there so that you can lecture about overheated rhetoric. Just sayin.
Yeah, a pretty big difference between here and Manhattan. I have a CCP which is pretty hard to get in NJ, but impossible to get in Manhattan. The sole difference between a white-knight assaulting me scot-free and becoming the next Trayvon Martin.
Did you change the meetup location? My friend in Jersey City wants to go.
Haven’t decided yet.
Might push it into NYC
So how do we know where to meet?
All the SJWs got was a tactical victory (the lowest kind possible). In exchange for this, they’ve outed themselves on social media using their real names and profiles, displayed their true colors via the various death threats they’ve made, and have unwittingly created tons of PR for Roosh.
All in all, this was certainly a strategic and operational victory. That said, Roosh needs to get MUCH better with security and response time. To anyone that didn’t know before, this incident shows how far SJWs are willing to go to satiate their insanity. Surprise and secrecy are necessary when planning and executing events like this, for obvious reasons.
I have dozens of violent threats from SJWs on Facebook saved. I plan to scope out the public meeting spot in my town to photograph every protester who’s hanging around looking for a guy to take a swing at.
Do it discretely, 3 years of law school (studying for the bar exam now) has taught me at the very least that taking someone’s photo without their consent can get you on the wrong side of a lawsuit.
If you’re gonna do that though, I’d say make note of the types of SJWs that you see at the place (antifa, fat feminists, hipsters, etc) as well as any notable figures that you see. Then, send all of that stuff up the chain, if you will.
Best of luck on the bar exam. I’l be damned careful. I don’t even intend to share yet, rather to figure out what individuals were willing to show up in public to violently disrupt a peaceful gathering. I figure many of those same people will be willing to show up again down the road.
I’m hoping to identify the most aggressive of white knights before they ever take a swing.
Roosh, a bunch of SJW faggots, probably in accord with Anonymous, released your stateside address. Watch out.
They lost alot of credibility when they supposedly linked government officials in the Klan . Anyone remember when they used to raid kids game and form swastikas with the characters you could make ?
I never liked Anonymous to begin with. Those folks were SJWs.
PCCop needs to write an article on here
You should have never cancelled the meetup in the first place.
Yes, capitulating to them allowed them to feel superior and post his address, Im certain someone was threatening violence or doxxing a large number of people of rooshv. Simply can’t live in this world with a different idea because there will always be some faggot hacker that will cause you and your family harm.
It gagued and depressurized the opposition. The death threats based on misinformation formed a bubble and then popped like a big zit or boil. Now they’re covered in pus.
There are people who are going to their meet ups anyway. The removal of the ROK sanction freed people to act independently. This is the fundamental difference between neomasculinity and SJW ideology. Many of us don’t need permission. The SJWs have a hive mind mentality and cannot act independently.
It’s absurd that you’d have to cancel in any democratic nation, meetings where law abiding male citizens agree to meet and go then to a pub and talk about whatever the hell they wish to converse about. The type of hysteria and bullying we’ve witnessed erodes our core democratic principles and once you concede these you may as well usher in the fascists and the communists. It’s interesting how the mainstream media let their standards of objectivity and impartiality down at the very first hurdle. It’s a very sad day for the notion of the free press and its integrity and independence.
Freedom of speech has never been tolerated for groups who present a genuine threat to the order.
Our masters aren’t afraid of feminism, socialism or even Islamisation. They’re afraid of neomasculinism, which risks weakening their control over their tax and debt slaves. And they’re afraid of Daryush Valizadeh. Quite an accomplishment for someone without access to an atomic bomb.
Plus patriarchal minded men want to wrest back control over our women away from the clutches of the state. The state will feul and flag any ruse to beat us back and silence us.
Some SJW posted a link to this article:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/76578614/neomasculinist-group-return-of-kings-cancels-worldwide-meetups.html?cid=facebook.post.76578614
“Valizadeh, who advocates for legalising rape on private property and supported the Roast Busters group in the past, had set up the meetings for like-minded men across the globe.”
Has Roosh even heard of the Roast Busters or are they just packing on one lie on top of another?
It’s a smear campaign.
I cannot understand why it wasn’t organised through e-mails, unless, the real reason was actually to attract the attention of the mainstream media and raise the profile both of himself and the website. You must admit, it was a pretty canny and clever strategy.
There’s also another problem if he merely attempted to organize this this just using email: a lack of a protocol to distinguish legit members from infiltrators.
My friends and I had this same problem in undergrad when trying to deal with those types. Sometimes, you just have to put on a “failed” attempt in order to better identify them.
Hmm. perhaps, I thought putting the billboard listing up was a bad idea. Perhaps the next time, use old fashioned hand written conventional post at the first stage where you’d identify yourself through using print-outs of your electronic profile. Once verified, then set up electronically through e-mails. You’d need a bit more time initially, but, it would be a far wiser course and it’s almost impossible to hack snail mail!
I thought the idea of using disqus history to measure one’s loyalty isn’t a bad idea. I’d also add to that by placing an initial meet-up location in a place where SJWs would be afraid to go (biker bar, gun range, the hood, etc). By doing that, you could possibly vet them according to their online presence and by their comfort level in an unfamiliar environment.
Right. Because Roosh was so looking forward to having the police express only polite interest in the fact that psychotic women all over the planet were threatening to kill him or have a compliant beta give the sisterhood plausible deniability.
I wonder who tipped off the Daily Mail.
Roosh took the ‘State of Man’ tour through its course and adjusted strategies to complete the tour. The shit storm of sjw’s yesterday must have grown incalculably large. He could have ploughed through it like an amtrak train speeding toward ice piles, but I’m assuming the heat was probably placed on others, possibly family. Sjw’s never damaged me personally, but they go after your family. They’re fucking terrorists seriously. It’s best to nix them when they’ve got their heads up their butts.
What are we a book of the month club? This is an open forum that is attracting new members. Try to be the yeoman (admin) keeping up that list. I think email lists can work with local groups. Here’s how it would have been and will be successful the next time. Engage the alternative media. If we had their backing this might have actually been pulled off. Their lies and the narrative would have been picked apart and eviscerated.
” I haven’t messed around with rape topics since that article was written a year ago because people absolutely lose their minds when it comes to rape. ”
That is the single biggest proof that we don’t live in a rape culture and yet the progressives who scream in panic everytime Mr. Valizadeh puts metaphorical pen to paper are completely oblivious to this blatant contradiction. Either rape is tolerated or is it the worst crime you can commit. Reality suggests that the latter is true.
Nice article. I think it was needed.
Hello Roosh,
Thank you for clarifying that you do not advocate for rape. I have a few more questions.
My questions:
What is your stance on abortion? Do you feel a woman should have the full right to terminate a pregnancy before 20 weeks? Should a woman be required permission from a man to have an abortion?
You believe, from my understanding, that men should be the provider of the family while women tend to the children and the home. What should be done to men who leave their wives and children high and dry? What process should be in place to protect women who devote their lives to their “feminine” nature?
A close friend of mine was beaten so badly her ribs were broken, literally over spilled milk. Her abuser is quite a vocal supporter of you. What do you have to say to these men?
Are women only valuable based on their appearance? And subservience to men?
If women are meant to tend to children, do you think society should become more accepting to mothers, particularly those with small children? Do you think it is acceptable that women are harassed for breastfeeding in public?
In a recent viral video, a man found out his girlfriend had been cheating on him and forced her to walk home naked. I feel that this sort of abuse is not acceptable towards men or women. I know that there is a double standard that does need to be addressed. Aside from that, do you believe that was acceptable behavior?
How is your relationship with your mother? Does she know and understand your values?
Please do not specify your religious beliefs, I simply want to know, do you follow any organized region?
What are your opinions on raising young boys? Should they be taught from an early age that being more sensitive is unacceptable?
Do you hate all LGBTQ? Or do you simply not want them associated with your movement? Do you support discrimination against LGBTQs? .
What are your thoughts on polygamy?
Do you think monogamy is anti-masculine and/or an unacceptable standard for men?
Obvious loaded questions are obvious. If you’d really like to know more, feel free to peruse the site.
As this is addressed to Roosh personally, for him to answer personally, I should hope that you don’t assume that a lack of a detailed response from him does not mean that you can assume that his readers hold any particular views about the issues you have raised.
I am sure with anonymous putting out his information like that he will have a lot of things to tend to. I won’t be surprised if he doesn’t have the time or interest to respond. If he does, I will be quite interested!
It’s sad Brittney, but you are likely the last of your bloodline to leave a footprint on this earth judging by your words. If those be your only words and mission statement in life, then the fact that your dying branch withers as it does is self explanitory.
I am not sure what you mean?
Don’t worry. Your mother and her mother and even her mother probably wouldn’t have understood either. But they each lived in increasingly more and more patriarchal eras, and their lives likely revolved around pounding out increasingly more and more offspring.
Doesnt it say “satire” on top?
http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
It even said “legal rape” on Drudge.
Yes yes they shall hate us. Send your hate mail. Hate and loathing are our unfortunate catalysts. If only the baby blue-foot beta bump bump boizzz could see the logical light of our masculine gospels as high up on capital hill or in the holy chambers of the reverent (tee hee) Rachael Maddows of unHolywood then maybe then would this media hysteria cease and our light be scene.
Roosh your doing gods work. I’m sure he’s smiling from his chambers above.
Are you going to sue the politicians that slander you?
RooshV is a public figure and as such the “slander” bar for him is incredibly high. Further he is hung by his own words, and is more likely to pay dearly for filing a frivolous claim.
Oh yeah, it’s “libel” not slander.
Gee, can you hook me up with a discount on some snake oil? Hook a brutha up! I know you have a monopoly on that snake oil. No one makes it better than you. I’m completely certain about that!
From what I understand, Roosh is totally capable of facing these SJWs if he were to have an event where he would show up personally. Since the meetings were planned to be all over the world, he could not possibly be everywhere at once. For the sake of our lives, he decided to cancel the meetings. Sometimes, a tactical withdrawal is better than rushing into battle.
Remember the Roman general Fabius Maximus. He was constantly berated and insulted for refusing to engage Hannibal in battle as he thought the best way to fight Hannibal was through a war of attrition. Rome was itching for a battle, so they relieved him of his duties and put Gaius Terentius Varro in charge instead. Remember what happened? That’s right, the Battle of Cannae. Hannibal completely surrounded and destroyed the Roman army. It was not until after this battle that the people of Rome turned once again to Maximus’ guidance. They thought him to be a coward and a fool but now realized he was as wise as the gods.
And then after that, the term “That’s really Gai” was used to describe bad ideas.
Just kidding.
One of my favorites:
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Lives/Fabius_Maximus*.html
“Fabius, however, was not buried by the Romans at the public charge, but each private citizen contributed the smallest coin in his possession, not because his poverty called for their aid, but because the people felt that it was burying a father, whose death thus received honour and regard befitting his life”
Bwaaaa haw haw! Is your name Fabius Maximus or Gluteus Maximus?
goodshit, sir.
Roosh, you don’t owe anybody explanations. You have done nothing wrong. Everything people need to know about you is already on ROK or in your books. If people cannot or will not understand your writing, that’s their fault, not yours.
The people who owe us apologies and explanations are the banksters and their feminist daughters. Preferably given on a convenient scaffold.
Not that they’ll ever have the decency to give us any. The sisterhood will blaspheme and screech “PATRIARCHY” till the moment the hangman pulls the lever.
Exactly. Roosh, for all his understanding of the “fair gender”, does **not** get the simple fact that by explaining and apologizing, he’s further weakening his position and gravely digging himself deeper in a hole. It’s a cardinal rule in “game theory” and transactional analysis *never* to backtrack and apologize on a tactical withdrawal; it not only indicates a defeatist mind-set, but a clear admission of defeat and surrender.
This isn’t meant as an apology to the rank-and-file perpetually offended, but to clarify the site’s positions for new visitors who will be appalled at the degree and depth they have been lied to, and become regulars and masculinity converts. It’s a one stop shop for them rather than our having to constantly re-post links so they can read “How to Stop Rape” and other articles for themselves.
Pass the popcorn! It is entertaining to watch a bunch of douchebags compare themselves to Roman Generals, and guys who want to get laid like RooshV, invoke great battles. You all have such active imaginations. Face it, douchebags, you have unhealthy relationships with women in your lives, and are shifting the blame away from your miserable selves.
Is there not a river near by that you can throw yourself into?
Yes, as a matter of fact!
Ahh, poor baby! The only miserable cunt around here is you: just look at the number of posts you have obsessively written over the past day. You’re too self-absorbed to realize that just the act of spilling so much on a random disqus thread says so much about you: you claim that three days ago you didn’t know who Roosh was. And yet …
Now here you are … on fire! What does that say about you: well, you lead a sad, miserable, and pathetic existence. Face it, you don’t have kids because you wouldn’t waste so much time here. Ditto for significant other. Heck, you don’t even have a passion, like art, music, crafts, etc that you can devote to, to enrich your life. No. No, except you’re here ranting off about Roosh, and how much money he makes, and how this is all a cult. Who leads a miserable and lonely existence? Care to look at a mirror? Now don’t cry, or try to jump off a bridge. I’m only pointing out the sad and pathetic feature of your own life, to make you realize or think about that expression about casting stones.
Heard on the news selective service will soon require US women to register for the (military) draft.
usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/29/16745990-push-for-all-younger-women-to-register-with-selective-service-gaining-steam?lite
I support equal opportunity!
they wont be put on the front lines so it doesn’t matter much
If the special forces is letting them in, then they should be put on the frontlines just like the men. When their POWs they can explain their rights to the enemy.
Fucking insane. This is all based on the false notion that men and women are just a social construct. Reality itself is under attack.
THIS
Do you read the Vesti?
What I find harrowing to the soul is the fact that mainstream media sites teamed up to willfully engage in the illegal acts of slander and libel against a law-abiding citizen.
It’s very simple people, if Roosh were guilty of these heinous accusations criminal proceedings would have been brought against him already. Specific women would have filed actual charges and he would have been arrested, arraigned, and likely convicted on said charges especially with his high-profile persona. Bill Cosby anyone?
The fact that public officials resorted to a clearly meticulously-organized smear campaign evidences that they know he is innocent and they can’t get to him any other way. Honestly, I believe there are grounds for a “defamation of character” lawsuit against the BBC and every media outlet who knowingly took part in this. It’s time to fight the establishment with the establishment and demonstrate once-and-for all that free societies WILL NOT EVER tolerate or submit to these Orwellian, mafia-like tactics aimed to silence dissenting, politically incorrect ideas.
Either that or we might have to go guerrilla. Hate to say it, but maybe a 1940’s style French resistance is soon on the horizon.
almost makes you think muslims have the right idea in their hatred of what modern civilization has become
noticing that too, eh?
Oh brother, talk about overblown rhetoric. What else you got, Drama Queen? Here’s an alternative to revolution: give up women. They are way too complex for troglodytes like you. Embark on a meaningless, shallow fuck-fest like your fearless leader, RooshV. Hopefully you will not share the same fate: AIDS, syphilis, chlamydia, herpes, etc. You get what you pay for- and Roosh pays for it! Kaching! $$$$
I actually don’t ascribe to the PUA lifestyle, but it’s telling that you’d tar us all with the same brush.
Pay Gee no mind. She is a fraud. There is nothing serious about her. You can move on to more important things.
Pfft. What do you know about me, keyboard cowboy? All hat, no cattle!
One of the freaks.
As I said before, I am a bullshit magnet. Your commentaries naturally attract me. Carry on!
These outsiders are just shouting at ghosts. It is really quite amusing.
PUA’s are the least of their worries. They at least engage on some level with the opposite sex. What Gee Aye is advocating for is already happening. MGTOW has been gaining traction like crazy and that’s what is really going to hit them right at their core when it reaches critical mass.
“Strong” and “independent” are already giving way to the whining about the lack of good men and the lamentations of self-imposed spinsterhood.
All of the rhetoric and posturing in the world can’t stop what’s coming.
I wouldn’t be surprised if bachelor taxes make a comeback soon.
Women complex?!? Come on, surely you don’t believe that. Now, I could care less about being a player and even less for women … but women are **not** complex. Shallow, frivolous, empty, frail, fickle … all these yes; yes, emphatically. But complex? Come on. Forget the whole male vs female crap, and just be objective. Melville was complex, Shakespeare was complex, Plato was complex. Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders? Britney Spears? Chloe Kardashian? Come on.
You’re not preaching to the choir here but you are on the choir’s forum. The questions that we want (and I understand they might not be answered til after the 6th) is what really happened with meet up day?
RooshV with or without a lawyer’s advice decided the risk was too great, that he didn’t want to be a defendant when (not if) someone held him liable for anything from a broken fingernail to a broken jaw. Nothing noble about that, just covering his own ass.
I read the statement. There is more to it I highly suspect. Are you his close personal friend or have some other special knowledge the rest of us don’t? In some places he is being accused of using this meet up day as a stunt to sell books. I would prefer to believe this is false.
There’s no way he could have predicted this. The lies and false outrage started on some communist sub on reddit, and then they spread it and got a hold of the newspapers…and now the worldwide lynch mob. Roosh is clever, and no doubt enjoys stirring up a little controversy, but that wasn’t the point of the meetings.
I enjoy the controversy. But since it was cancelled it is beyond controversy. I would like to hear what really happened from the horses mouth or potentially a close source. Were we used to drum up book sales or did something genuine go down? If it’s the latter I would like to know what specifically it was.
Hmmmm … don’t worry, I’m not particularly interested in your ranting, but you do bring up some rather interesting and intellectually stimulating ideas. It’s a complicated issue … that of liability across borders. ie I don’t know what Spanish laws are, but can someone in Spain hold Roosh accountable for a broken collar bone as a result of the ROK meeting? The same would be true of New Zealand or Australian laws; ie can someone across the globe be held liable for an event? But, I presume in the U.S., the issue of liability stands across state boundaries.
You are on the defensive here. It would have been a bigger statement to not write this article.
So I’ll just start off by coming clean: I’m a woman and, I don’t know, *fairly* progressive. I recognize and respect this was set up to be, if you’ll pardon the term, a “safe space” for like minded men, but I’ve been a casual lurker for some time and I’m not here to cause any trouble. In fact I’m wholly sympathetic, even empathetic to many of the talking points re: third wave feminism, gender blah blah blah and body “positivity,” namely.
That being said, had I not relinquished my “professional journalist” title a few years back, this story would have ended it for me. The speed with which drama-seeking MSM and Generation Outrage can spread misinformation is staggering. One could easily believe from headlines (since few take the time to read stories) that angry, pitchfork-wielding men were set to descend upon our fair towns to rape anyone in sight and claim it is their right as men. Quite a far cry from some guys getting together for beers to talk about things they agree on, regardless of how unpopular.
The whole rapist/pro-rape thing was quite insidious, too. Regardless of whether or not someone read it as satire (frankly almost everything I’ve read has given me Fry meme face [not sure if…] and an ounce of incredulity) the piece was based around rape ceasing to be an issue. If someone had pulled out “victim blamer” I could see that, but seeing as how they cry about self defense classes and concealed carry permits as promotion of rape culture and victim blaming, I tend to find the phrase off putting. But this is modern journalism. Facts are secondary to outrage.
Sure, I’ve read plenty that I suppose offended me, but it’s mostly just the broad brush with which women are painted and given practically no room for deviation from the useless, manipulative banshees depicted in writing. The confounding idea that if a woman has sex, she’s a used up whore, but you should totally have sex with as many as possible makes me roll my eyes, too. I see a lot of bitter sounding raving about what’s bad, but nothing in particular about what’s good which, by logic of the frequently used “marriage material” title, *has* to exist, right? (Anyone is welcome to direct me to something I’ve easily missed.) Like the 10 worst female role models- someone give them a 10 best. I’d read that in a heartbeat.
So I guess we’re at, “I don’t agree with what you said (not all of it, anyway), but I’ll fight for your right to say it.” This page is endlessly entertaining in several capacities and I’m genuinely sorry the liberal agenda did the, well, classic liberal agenda thing, and twisted the facts into what they have.
“I’m genuinely sorry the liberal agenda did the, well, classic liberal agenda thing, and twisted the facts into what they have.”
A minor correction. I identify as a Classical Liberal, and what they have done is anything but liberal. Making up wholesale lies and appealing to statist authorities to forcefully silence an opponent is the far from being Classically Liberal. “Typical Progressive” would be a better descriptor for this sort of censorship.
Good point. In my head there was a sarcastic “aw, shucks, CLASSIC liberal” and a faux-enthusiastic arm swing, but, yes, it reads like an insult to classical liberalism, which was not my intent. My apologies!
From above : ” …I’m genuinely sorry the liberal agenda did the, well, classic liberal agenda thing, and twisted the facts into what they have.” — This isn’t liberalism, liberalism is as you said, ‘I disagree with what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it’ ; what we are seeing here is left-wing cultural Marxism (hell, Mao-ism) designed to promote victimization culture in order to denigrate and destroy a targeted subset of society.
From above : “That being said, had I not relinquished my “professional journalist” title a few years back,” … why don’t you knock out some well written long form stuff when you can? I’m dying for anything written that’s actually reasoned and coherent, thus the reason I come here to this site.
You have triggered so many people all over the world. Bravo. Hats off to you.
Gentlemen and Roosh. First, Roosh you are to be commended for your bravery. I challenge any one of us in the Neomasculine community to switch seats with Roosh right now. Talk about the weight of the world on your shoulders. Could it be more literal
Interesting week for us.
Point – We have seen the beast in its fullest incarnation. Don’t kid yourself, this has nothing to do with rape or even Roosh’s satirical piece on rape. We are an indictment of the liberal progressive establishment, which is sadly in power. We are deconstructing the deconstructionalists. This is about what we are saying and what we believe and since what we believe is the truth this is about talking and revealing truth. This is about, for instance, saying boldly without any reservation that men and women are different. A statement like that and, with emphasis, an ideology behind it, contradicts the establishment at a fundamental level.
Crazy…its fucking crazy to write that and realize that literally saying that men and women are different is so diametrically at odds with the powers that be when such a statement is so ipso facto obvious! Of course its not just that item its all the others we profess but they are also all equally grounded in truth.
Gents, this is why we fight and will continue to fight. Its been a rough week. But, I am undeterred. The actions of our enemies and their fraudulent beliefs that reject reality itself must be confronted. Over the last 48 hours we confronted and exposed the beast it all its regalia. The advantage is it can not hide any longer and from here on out we have the advantage.
Roosh, you don’t have the weight of the world on your shoulders…far from it. There are more of us that believe the things we believe than these freaks and they are just a bunch of freaks.
Take a page from Trump and do not apologize to these SJW cowards.
Folks, this is all about the mighty dollar. As you feed Roosh’s narcissism here, please don’t forget to buy one (or a dozen) of his “Bang” books… Is he selling t-shirts yet?
Roosh crapped out on Feb 6 because he was afraid of lawsuits. Thats it. Nothing noble, but practical and in his own best interest, not yours. Buy a book!
I would love a ROK ‘Keep Calm and fight Crybullies” T-shirt!
No it’s not. I’ve been reading your posts and comments. Your are a troll who uses big words and fallacious arguments. There is nothing intellectual about you. You are a pretentious fool.
Oh dear, are you stalking me?
I’m not stalking you, I’m a bullshit magnet. Carry on.
Really? Okay, what else do you think you know about me?
I read your comments. You are a faux intellectual. It’s quite obvious. Keep posting comments.
Faux, schmoe. Whatever. I guess that’s how you jerk-offs put down women with brains, who arent the kind Roosh drags home, too drunk to give consent to have intercourse. Some call that rape. At least you didn’t call me uppity– yet.
Name calling and epithets through suggestion. You are nothing but a fool because you employ the use of shaming tactics dressed in fancy language and big words, nothing more. Do better. You are the proverbial “suckah emcee”, nothing more. There is no content to what you say. If comments and critiques were meals then you’d be a Snicker’s bar and a glass of Kool Aid made with aspartame. Just saying’.
For someone so “upset” about being stalked, you seem rather fixated with Roosh, since you have done nothing but post comments on his sites with your account.
Admit it, you are attracted to Roosh. You love his sexy, manly beard, the sound of his voice turns you on, and his overall presence is very appealing to you. You like him a lot. You’re very fond of him and it makes you sad that you can’t have him. You fantasize about him towering over you, touching you all over, and dominating you and giving you a good pounding like only a real man can. Imagine it. Imagine your legs wrapped around his muscular body as he enters you, and his prickly beard scraping against your naive face, and how it would feel as he ejaculates millions and millions of bearded sperm into your body. When you’re in your bed tonight, I promise you that you will remember these words that you’re reading right now, and you will find yourself having naughty thoughts about him. As you fall asleep, your last thoughts will be “Roosh…Oh Roosh…Oh Rooshie! Take me! Touch me!” You will remember these words. You ARE going to fantasize about being taken by him. You WILL. You love Roosh. He’s your boyfriend who lives in your mind.
They want him you are correct.
Al the Bayshore Control freak, I can’t imagine what “big words” and “fancy language” I have “employed”… you sound like a nut job, and appear to be stalking me. “Do better” you say- for you? For who? I don’t give 2 shits what you think, Al the Control Freak. Do you always boss women around? Go stuff it, jackass! (Are those words too big and fancy for ya?)
Oh, Jeez. Do you write soft core porn for a living?
Do you recognise my pen name from the rape-themed romance novels you rock the little man in the boat to every night?
Yeah, for a scarecrow!
I’m no control freak. I am holding a mirror to your face and revealing your foolishness to you. And now you are mad; you are now resorting to expletives and foul language. I am not the cause of your woes. The itch beneath your skin, the discomfort in your joints, and the pain your sinews is not my doing. It’s you and the realization of your inadequacy. I did that. By the way, “you’re welcome”.
Your comments are becoming more crass. Keep up the good work. Nice job! Keep posting comments.
Actually I do and I make really good money from it!
No, you didn’t. I think you’re kinda funny, a deluded, pompous jackass who is projecting some sort of impact and/or control over my thoughts and feelings. On the contrary, you’re stalking me and not the other way around, so I am under your skin. Ew. Keep tawkin’ and I promise I’ll keep my words not-big and not-fancy for ya!
“appear to be stalking me”
Let me guess you’re a transgender “woman” right? Gee Aye is basically a Brianna Wu wannabe. Another freak who accuses people of stalking him, I mean her to get sympathy.
I need a minute to gather my reply to you. I am having trouble managing my laughter. I need some time to convince myself of the need to take you seriously. I apologize.
No apologies, Allen. Why would you take me seriously, Afred? I certainly don’t take you seriously, Albert.
You are taking this too seriously. Get over it. I still need a few moments to get my shit together. Am I still laughing at you? Yes. Do I need to get my shit together? Hell yeah. I need some respite. Give me my space so I can form a coherent response. I’m not asking much.
Now Allen, youve made another presumption- that I am taking you “too seriously.” I am delighted you are laughing, there is so much sadness in this world. I’ve nothing to “get over.” By all means, don’t form a coherent response, unless you’ve got the dreaded “lastword-itis.” I’m bored with you, Alfred.
I’ll concede. It’s time for me to go. I apologize. I cannot do this anymore. The only way for me to continue with some semblance of proper decorum is to possess a healthy respect for those with whom I engage in discourse. I am unable to do that. I apologize. G’night.
”To drunk to give consent”. Hey look another one that thinks being drunk makes you incapacitated to think. I was shit-drunk so many times in my life and still knew what the fuck i was doing. Sure there was physical coordination loss but my brain fucking worked. Stop making excuses for the type of men that you choose in your life saying that you were drunk and didn’t know what you were doing and decided to regret it the next day.
But you are taking me seriously. There is a noticeable change in your behavior that points to this but I don’t want to “tell” you what it is because I may find use of it should we ever engage in future discourse.
I partially agree with you. It was partly self-serving, and not some grand Christ-like sacrifice to save the flock as some here have noted. But then again, in our age and epoch, can you honestly blame anyone for behaving in a selfish and self-serving manner? We hardly, in our society, inculcate virtue and true character, and especially not stoicism, so what do you expect?
I have previously commented on another article, but in a short synopses I came to this site to find out truth. A “pro – rape group” seemed so outrageous that I decided to see what the media was really trying to cover up.
After reading several articles I am impressed beyond words. I would also have to say that I agree with most of what I have read on this site. It is a group of intellectuals discussing their opinions on why society is the way it is particularly in the area of gender identity and gender roles. I am ecstatic to find people that hold similar ideas as myself. Although there are a few areas in which I don’t entirely agree I’m excited to learn more from you all if anyone is willing to oblige me in discussion.
Personally to Roosh, I want to sincerely apologize for how this social response has forever damned your reputation. By reading many of your articles I now see that everything they have been saying about you is false. You’re an intelligent man addressing a tough subject that no one has the gall to address anymore. I also want to apologize for all the female rage I know you are encountering and will continue to encounter. Although this unwarranted anger is highly based in social conditioning I want to encourage you that a few of us will hear what you’re actually saying.
I look forward to great discussions and learning more from the members of this group. As I mentioned before I’m always eager to learn more through discussion. I wish the best of luck to you all.
Another one joins the bust !
welcome to the party!
EDIT: good on you for using your head
Thank you! I look forward to more informative articles
Glad to see I’m not the only woman who likes this site! I am so thankful to have grown up when I did……I would hate to be a girl growing up nowadays
Likewise. Nice to see you here, sisters! I have a couple of female friends to whom I gave links to various articles from this site and they love what they read. But still too few and I’m glad I’m not alone here.
From what I have seen all this webpage does is tell young men to value their lives and feelings as much as a young woman and ask that pretty girl out even though she might reject you. Women who get it will get it because they are real women not bots.
I love the positive message this page has for men. And like another member pointed out a change in men life this would cause a positive change in female culture as well
Yes a return to traditional mammalian pair bonding and the destruction of Globalism and Marxism could usher in Humanity’s golden era.
There is alot of useful wisdom for women on this site also. One of the main themes of ROK, and society in general at the moment, is the pandemic unhappiness among Western women. They are miserable, bitter, and depressed and it affects everyone around them.
All men on this site (and men everywhere) want is for women to make better choices that ensure long term happiness instead of 4-5 years of sluttiness followed by 40 years of cats, antidepressants, and divorce.
Ha. You don’t believe that.
Don’t believe what?
Thanks, Brock, we were almost convinced there was some value to ROK and then your comment confirms it is more like Return of Dickheads. Slut is a word used by insecure people like yourself and exposes you for the bigot and ignoramus you are.
Grow the fuck up.
Lorina, I would invite you to follow your own advice. Your choice of language, while it may be an attempt to admonish strongly is equally crude and undesirable. If you are shortsighted enough to read one comment and decide the entire site rests upon it then you aren’t someone I’ll take seriously.
People that get offended by terms like slut are immature and need to grow up. Slut is an accurate description of a lecherous female. I bet most sluts call themselves sluts in private. Don’t let my choice of words distract you from the point of my comment though.
There is indeed, due to the SJW dominated urban environment I have been living in, I can’t publicly voice my views as a traditionalist. For example I believe it’s unhealthy for women to work corporate jobs and I find the nightlife-hookup culture disgusting, I think single women are better off taking up feminine hobbies and staying at home on Friday-Saturday nights instead of slutting it up and damaging themselves, but I can’t say such things out loud for the fear of becoming a social leper.
They do. I have seen a few sluts who call themselves as such and feel no shame about it. It’s truly sickening.
The word slut has little to do with sex really. It’s more about being a cheap, shallow, low self-esteemed individual in general. It’s possible to have sex with many men in a classy way but so many choose to be so trashy.
The instagram sluts who post hundreds of half naked selfies are still sluts even if they are virgins. It’s the mentality, it’s an addiction for attention much like a drug addiction. Such women are inclined to abuse alcohol and drugs, too.
You are right -Ann Coulter had a long string of boyfriends but I wouldn’t call her slutty.
All you smart beautiful women who agree with the views on this site should start a similar movement called Return of Queens
I have been thinking of that idea in fact, some of us living in SJW dominated urban areas would like to find and get together with like minded sisters.
That was already a site, it died out.
No.
Check out VerilyMag.com. The founders of that site are East Village–NYC dwelling female writers who like you reject and criticize the “Sex and the City” lifestyle endemic to urban environments and the feminism that fuels such lifestyles. They advocate ideas and principles completely antithetical to magazines such as Cosmopolitan, Glamour and Vogue. I think they might be women you would agree with.
Tony they’re some men on this page who are here thinking good men will protect their fucked up mentalities towards women. If yous are really here to spread awareness then please target the men whos minds are all about revenge on women. THEY ARE MAKING YOUS LOOK BAD. Our society has sexualized EVERYTHING and its not our fault that our minds are morphed. ALOT of men just want women to satisfy their own ego and control. alot of good women get abused by the hands of bad men. YOU NEED TO PROTECT THOSE WOMEN so they wont change into women who lose their faith in men and become lost and susceptible to this negative influence of “never trust a man”.
That makes perfect sense, protect the women who make the bad choices to date bad men then blame all men for their own bad decisions.
*clap clap*
Bravo “Youse” cunts.
…I would hope then you go to your friends, family, co-workers and those that claim to ‘know what they are talking about’ and show them the wisdom you have found here.
I intend to and have already posted a lengthy status about this site on Facebook.
It blows my my mind that women against this site are basically saying that they hate men who promote good health , strong mind , and sound body .
I suggest, Kirsten, that you actually go back and read posts on the site; it is full of women-hating slurs and hate speech in general. What wisdom there may be is hidden by a mountain of crap. You are just a piece of meat for their pleasure. The “fat shame” women (one response to my comments was to call me a “fat cunt” even though hey have no idea what I look like).
“Being feminine” to them is to be subservient and obedient (old testament shit). Women have fought for too long to create a modicum of equality for ourselves to take seriously the rantings of these guys.
I would have more respect for them if they had more respect for women.
Just writing this labels me a “femtard”; they’re partial to adding “tard” to the ends of words.
You are only hurting yourself by promoting anything to do with this site.
What’s wrong with fat shaming? Do you believe being morbidly obese is a good thing? Yes, I am aware some of the authors here use foul language and I don’t agree with their views or excessive generalizing, but there are a number of other contributors to this site who write high quality, intellectually stimulating content without hurling insults. I don’t see eye to eye with Matt Forney, for example, but I agree with some of the things he writes. I think it’s stupid and prejudiced to dissmiss an entire site and a whole lot of authors because you don’t like this or that view. Even a broken clock shows the correct time twice a day.
You come at us guns blazing on our turf, and expect us to play nice. Sorry sister but I’ve seen your behavior over the last couple of days and all I have to say is, if your looking for a fight on our turf your not going to like the results!
The site has some political content I do not agree with at all. The articles from Quintus Curtius are awesome, that guy goes digging some really great men, and the way he talks about history is great too, so I followed up on his articles and made humbly some homework to learn more.
I broke up with feminism a long time ago, I was told “I did not knew what it meant”.
This was really mind blowing, as if I could not understand a definition in a dictionary, while I speak fluently 4 languages.
There is a lot of polical movements that have amazing goals on paper, but their realization becomes a nightmare.
As far as rapists, let me tell you something. During patriarchal times, if a man was found raping a women, he would be hanged by his balls to a tree. We all know as men the things that cannot be done.
Feminism has all the virtues, patriarchy all the sins. The truth is that plenty of honorable men have enacted laws that would benefit both genders, because they understood a word called wisdom.
Feminism cannot be attacked or simply criticized, by outsiders, let alone inside their movement, some of their speakers are not allowed at their own conferences. Contingent to is the birth of a proto Orwellian language derived from pop psychology.
All that I see, including my male friends who have nothing to do with ROK, is a movement that is now power hungry, constantly dividing us, by victim blaming, and that became mysandrist at its core.
Am I blaming feminism for my own crap? No, I own my shit. It is just hard to find a place where a bunch of guys talk philosophy, history, and exchange tips about becoming better, and yeah getting girls too, we are guys after all right?
Unless, I have to be an eunuque.
But you grow older, and then you understand as Roosh did, that there is a higher purpose.
I grew up in France, open Charlie Hebdo, one page of that journal will make the article on rape by Roosh look like Disneyland. Some of his writing made me laugh hard, he is provocative, he knows he is shaking the coconut.
Roosh did not promote rape, we just want to take back the redefinition of masculinity, and take those words “toxic”, or “rape culture” out of the way.
What is culture but a common denominator or common values we all share?
Those words are insulting to most of us, as if we were all gathering to rape women in some secret society website.
After reading some of your comments even due I can’t agree with some ( I do agree with you on some views) I have to say I like how you state your case. I am always up for a good debate and hate troll insulting comment wars. Two people should have the right to state their views, discuss them without one side throwing nothing but insults to shame them in to submission.
Some guys are extreme when it comes to gender views. However, some women are extreme feminine, some people are extreme christians, some people are extreme muslims, and some are extreme health nuts. The point is that don’t let the extremist get to you, feminine is a good concept when its done right. For ex, equal pay, equal opportunity etc. It’s not good when its pushes extreme view (like shaming men for things like “learn how to attract women an honest way.) This site is better than what the mainstream media has to offer guys. Some views met be extreme, but guys at least its not like what MTV, VH1 and BET pushes.
Guess the bible is a fluke according to you it is “old testament shit.” Assuming like most people do that would mean that the story between Adam and Eve difinitely has NO significance to you nor any other women.
Damn! i have to stop making assumptions! *sarcasm*
What a nice message. 100 million more girls like you please.
She’s a Wallace, descendant of William Wallace from Braveheart.
By reading this comment, I can see that we have accomplished our mission then. Getting people like you, who can feel that there is something inherently wrong with the modern world, to come to our point of view.
Welcome. Now it’s your job to slowly but surely spread the message among people in your network.
I absolutely intend to. When I was in college I worked on a lengthy project where I addressed how the toxic feminist movement was damaging not only to masculinity but not helping women in the process. I spoke on the practicality of gender roles and how women inherently aren’t capable of what men can do and vice versa. I also touched on how this societal change has causedHeber identity issues. My solution and advice was that feminine traits and roles should become as equally valued. Instead we have women trying to gain equality by becoming like men and degrading men by assigning them feminine traits in negative ways.
My work wasn’t received tastefully as expected but it hasn’t prevented me from trying. I’m glad I came across this page and found like minded people. 1
Roosh’s reputation is not damned. The social response is not God’s will, it tends to the other extreme and it will pass. A damning there is a blessing, as more people like you will learn the truth. You are here, and that is a blessing.
Damned was a bit of a harsh comparison. Unjustly trained would’ve been a better choice. There is a blessing to come from this. Many will come seeking this group and hopefully many of those people will start to see truth. Although I can’t thank this group in particular for my awakening as it has been progressing for many many years It has shown me hope for the future of people and has shown me that I’m not alone in my unpopular ideas and beliefs.
Cool…I think you’re sincere. Thanks for your comment. Please defend us and spread the word that we’re not evil
I gladly will. I don’t care if I’m met with hate. People need to know what is really going on
You’re a good egg. Do look after yourself should people take umbrage with what you say.
Ohhhhh you sure will be met with hate. People always hate what they don’t understand or what is not forcibly fed down their throats by some ”official” media or government or whatever superior entity they derive their ideas from. But keep strong.
I certainly will. Thank you, sir. Thankfully I don’t have much in a reputation for them to destroy and I have no family for them to threaten or go to with my supposed “big secrets” that could be fabricated. I hope I can at least help though.
Your contributing as you have and being a beacon of reason and logic in the face of hysteria is immensely helpful-don’t underestimate that and always keep in mind that I respect it.
Thank you. I see that there are people assuming my profile is fake and I’m sure the attacks are coming. I’ll keep your words of encouragement in mind. Thank you so much.
What a classy thing to say. You have redeemed a small bit of my hope.
Ah, nice to see a post like this.
Faith in humanity restored.
Or fish hook swallowed ?
Those fake accounts lmao.
Any intelligent person can see its not a fake profile…But if you want to convince yourself of a lie then it does no harm to me so carry on.
Keep on reading their articles, you should pay a visit to their forums also. One day you will finally figure out who they actually are. Oh and those Muslims you hold a nonjudgmental view of? Yeah.. guess what side they are on.
But keep on reading who Roosh is and his followers. Some learn the easy way, others learn the hard way.
I definitely will. I try to stay open minded to where if solid truth and facts are laid before me my beliefs can and will change accordingly. Where can I find access to the forums? I’d love to get more into the discussions. I’m currently going through the top 35 most important articles that was posted as a suggested read
If you”re interested in History, the ones of Quintus Curtius are the best.
I definitely will thank you
You’re fake. It’s obvious.
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?
What is the hard way, Rad Repub?
Nice catfish profile, bro.
Thanks for your open mind and truth seeking curiosity.
must bang.
Some days can be pleasant. A welcome respite from the last few days.
Thank you for saying everything that I have been trying to ram into the heads of my peers for the past few days. I was sent the link on Tuesday night and had to see this site for myself. I was pleasantly surprised because I agree with so much that was said. I am so disappointed in the way lies have been spread and I hope people can take it upon themselves to see where you are coming from and let you be. You got a female supporter in me.
your first paragraph summed up my thoughts perfectly. a “pro-rape” group simply did not sound right at all. if it was it would receive my condemnation in its fullest sense. at the very least the articles are written to provide the reader with the ability to agree, disagree and all points in between.
as a man, do I find some of it over the top? sure. however there are many, many points that provide inherent truths that would confound the most ardent supporters of todays feminist movement. women are different than men is so many ways yet they are not points of shame. they should be celebrated. I saw a facebook meme which I thought contained a massive truth. re equality: we are not equal. women are here to do what men cant. so stop trying to be like one.
The more people read the more will see that we don’t walk in lock-step here. We have people from all beliefs and walks of life. We know when something is being overdone for effect.
And many of us have openly stated we don’t always agree with everything here or completely with one another. That is the value of the diverse range of topics the writers cover.
Many quote Aristotle in that we are capable of entertaining many thoughts.
Personally, I was shaped by something one of my parents once said:
“We all have the capacity for greatness at the end of our path. Those paths run parallel courses to one another, making none superior. Being superior is judged by how far along your path you manage to come.”
Thank you! I frequent this site, but I don’t do it out of any hatred; this is simply a place where we discuss problems and ideas that aren’t acceptable to talk about elsewhere. It’s amazing how far others will go to make sure that we can’t even have that!
lol. So you created this profile for the express purpose of commenting on these threads. Super credible kiddo.
Well said Kirsten. I am deeply saddened that the meet ups have been cancelled because of hysteria creating, anti male propaganda that was spread by lazy media who obviously didn’t do their research. I also feel the need to apologize for the female rage but I can’t possibly assume responsibility for women who are unwittingly caught up in the current mind f*** machine that they blindly participate in and perpetuate on a daily basis. Unenlightened women can be dangerous. I was a young girl when the women’s liberation movement began and I grew up watching women and men fight TOGETHER for equality for women on many fronts…education, political representation, workplace, even in the home. I was too young to participate in bra burnings and protests but my family was active in the movement and I literally lived the movement. Growing up I was always told not to listen to people who told me I couldn’t amount to much because I was female. In high school I was put on the vocational tract and was not allowed to take chemistry and calculus and physics and was instead put in two years of typing classes and home economics because women were supposed to be secretaries and raise families. My mom went to up to the school and was livid. She was told that it was ok because they didn’t put Hispanics (Mexicans is the term they used) on the college tract anyway. So as someone who has LIVED discrimination I understand how deeply disappointed you men who really needed to have these meet ups must be and I’m sorry this has happened to you. This is just a bump I the road. In my life I have seen so many firsts …. the first woman mayor of my town, the first woman astronaut, in the UK the first woman prime minister, the Lilly Ledbetter Act …. and many firsts have turned into seconds, fifths, one hundredths, thousandths, and millionths. These so called modern feminists can not see the forrest for the trees. It’s utterly dumbfounding that they can not see that women have arrived and those of us still scrapping at it rather than maintaining and working together are just playing King of the Heap trying to keep everybody off the hill including the men who help us rise to the top. That goes for the LGBT community as well. Without support from the straight community they would still be scrapping at it. To see the ROK group also billed as homophobes as well as rapists is gravely disappointing. I’m here to tell you fellas that you have support out there. Support from women who love you and care about you and work along side you every day. Your mothers, your sisters, your daughters, grandmothers, aunts, cousins, nieces, granddaughters, friends, and coworkers. Sensible women who understand that the true meaning of equality doesn’t mean shutting men down. Modern feminists have become the Neanderthals that we found it necessary to rise up against and they have become the new oppressors right along with their media in tow. I guarantee you the early women’s lib movement never intended it to be like this. Educate the women who know you and care about you. Many women they do not understand or even realize how far the pendumum has swung in the other direction. When you need us we will all be there for you.
Based on your avatar, it’s highly unlikely that Roosh will bang you. You can stop the mating dance.
You make me sad. I’m sad to see that you think of yourself as only a “dirty whore” whose only purpose is to be a “cum bucket”.
lol, this is what feminism already transformed 80% of the women of the western world.
In y’all’s delusional, little world, maybe that’s true. But in the real world, to sane people, you’re a bunch of paranoid, woman-hating losers.
Yeah I was on fb and damn was it filled with ppl saying patriarchy and roosh is a bad guy. He may say offensive things but I think he wants american women to better themselves. Hes an alright guy. We need neomasculinity and femininity back cause it seems as if we as humans are switching genders.
Very intelligent kirsten, I hope we have more of your breed.
It’s not that Roosh is not an intelligent man, it’s just the method of how he voices his opinions comes out really bad and at the expense of red pill purists. Because of his idiotic and chauvinistic behavior, the red pill society suffers as a whole. Imagine if Martin Luther King commanded his followers to exhort to physical violence, what people would really think of African Americans?
His way of portraying things has brought nothing but a political divide. This is not good. Lastly, the grown ass man still lives with his mom. What is up with that? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3432531/Pictured-pick-artist-center-international-pro-rape-storm-t-shirt-shorts-door-mother-s-home-lives-basement.html
Failure to meet > Success in broadcasting RoK to more people than if the Meetups had “succeeded”. Thank you, SJWs.
Why isnt the media covering MUSLIM RAPE GANGS?
They are using Roosh to DISTRACT YOU!
Where is the same outrage for bill clinton?
Directed towards Bill Cosby cause he is Black and SJW’s are really the racists..
Will someone with experience in handling slander/libel/defamation please step up? Media, especially UK Media, needs to be taught and expensive lesson.
I just had everything come together for me;
my daily routine viewing/listening to Alex jones… and I see a picture of Roosh…
totally had the “aha” moment I always knew was there.
The establishment, the elite, it’s not a conspiracy… it’s common sense.
There are people on top influencing a bunch of sheep.
The National Post also mentioned Roosh today… also funny.
Ghomeshi’s trial is ongoing.. and the testimony of a witness is totally collapsing on itself…
woman was supposedly abused, and said she never talked to him… but there is evidence she emailed him two flirtatious emails after he supposedly physically abused her..
her response as to why she would contact the physical abuser – “I was trying to bait him… so I could ask him why he abused me”…
this whole thing we’re living in… it’s gotta be a joke the computer simulation is running.
In the very same news media, Roosh is lampooned… and a woman who has basically lied (under oath) … is still taken seriously.
ONE journalist is not fooled— THANK YOU EZRA.
Lol Roosh’s tweets are hilarious
Roosh is now the feminist boogeyman “eat your veggies or Roosh will visit your city!”
He’s also their Santa Claus: “he’s going to be in Glasgow! He’s coming to Toronto! He’s already in Sydney!” Around the world in one night.
Its funny how these politicians are condemning Roosh for supporting rape while they are welcoming waves of rapists (aka young male muslim immigrants) and are refusing to address the issues they are creating.
Everything is an ethno-masochistic lie.
A little bit off topic, but still somewhat related. Check out the top comments of this article on Breitbart:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/04/ted-cruz-voicemails-ben-carson-exclusive-audio/
It appears as though they are going full shitlord over there. That’s right SJWs… Breitbart, Return of Kings, The Rational Male, American Renaissance, and of course all of the far right “stormer” sites have all awakened to your games and your lies.
The MSM narrative is almost completely in shambles. Admit that Roosh V just trolled the entire world and his website will now gain thousands of more followers.
You missed out the bit about how you still live in your mother’s basement http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3432531/Pictured-pick-artist-center-international-pro-rape-storm-t-shirt-shorts-door-mother-s-home-lives-basement.html
Lol, some “King”.
He doesn’t live in the US, he’s visting because a family member is sick. But thanks for the web click
loser.
Lol, nice try but no, that’s his home address.
I thought he was back in Poland:
http://www.rooshv.com/poland-is-embarking-on-the-path-of-sterility-over-life
Lol, nice sock account faggot.
That’s funny!
Anonymous are a bunch of SJW scumbags. Doxxing Roosh’s family
Nah, more likely he’s just you posing as fake outrage.
All Haill ROK!!
I don’t usually agree with Roosh, but he is a voice of reason. A voice in a world with imbalance and softness!
We are now at a tipping point where the opposite gender now realizes their vulnerability! Now we have to man up!
If it means being bastardized and scrutinized, so be it!
This is what separates us from them, we chug along through the gauntlet and never look back! Don’t worry about people whose gonna oppose you! Just worry about what you can control!
YOU CAN CONTROL YOUR LIFE AND THAT’S IT!
The people of Manosphere. Do your own shit in private! Let’s me up! I still want to meet up in Stuttgart! If any one is in the neighborhood just comment below!
Doesn’t Disqus have some feature where you can drop a line to someone’s profile where only they have access to open it if they wish?
Not sure because I am not very tech savvy for a millennial. But this is an open invitation for beers and good company.
Roosh, do you have a rogue moderator running around banning forum people who are posting the request Facebook captures of people who are threatening you?
The KKK rationalizes their hate speech as well… just sayin’
And… if you rationalize my disdain for this organization by saying it’s because I’m a woman, and women are sensitive, you’re really only supporting my point.
Bcuz muh KKK!
You’re autistic, idiotic, and definitely a woman.
Oh. Ouch. Being called autistic is SUCH an insult.
Well, someone needs to rape some sense into you.
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Creepy-Condescending-Wonka.jpg
I found you.
And…ding ding ding! You win at making the point the rest of the world is making while simultaneously disproving the argument that this is a harmless movement. Thanks man, you’re awesome.
And…ding ding ding! You’re a stupid, indoctrinated, brainless Femtard who actually believes I belong to this “movement.” Thanks for proving that all women are stupid conspiracy nuts. Thanks bitch, you’re not awesome.
You’re ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. I look JUST LIKE THAT! My hair so totally rocks.
You’re a fat, stupid cow so I just needed to find any Feminist and I’d find a fatsimile with a low-IQ.
We don’t rationalize our hate speech because we don’t do hate speech. Don’t know where you got that idea. You think that because we are criticizing SOME women , we hate ya guys ? That’s absurd and generalizing.
Advice. OK post, but be careful about making a piece that appears to be explaining and defending your actions. That allows the enemy to sense a chink in the aarmor and smell blood.
I cannot imagine what it would be like to be in the middle of a shitstorm. But from the outside looking in, here is my advice.
Maintain the frame that has made you famous. The implacable, irreverent, Roosh.
WhY is the media DISTRACTING you with Roosh?
They want you to forget about MUSLIM RAPE GANGS!!
You see how they ignore every single question from our side regarding real rape around the world? You asked the same question 20 times maybe and not one single person addressed it. Funny how they unravel themselves as truly disgusting people that don’t really care about real problems and just focus on petty conflict and buzz words just because they’re bored and want to pass some time.
You da man. Krosh de girly boys, und hear da lamentations of dere womyn.
Are you a repressed homosexual? It seems quite obvious that you are trying to compensate something with this whole “neomasculinity” thing (which already sounds super gay). Have you ever asked yourself where does all this misogyny comes from? Do women make you fell threaten?.
I think that you are petty, but still, even petty people are entitled to happiness; go see an analyst, take time to engage into some soul searching. Embrace yourself.
You’re not a licensed and registered pop psychologist.
You’re just another indoctrinated faggot.
No need to be hostile. I’m just sharing my impressions. I mean, how do you think normal people thinks about this boys-rule-girls-are-yucky club? It seems pretty gay to an outsider, let me tell you.
I think you’re brave and I will gladly march with you into the coming war ahead.
Are you a repressed homosexual? It seems quite obvious that you are trying to compensate something with this whole “neomasculinity” thing (which already sounds super gay). Have you ever asked yourself where does all this misogyny comes from? Do women make you fell threaten?.
I think that you are petty, but still, even petty people are entitled to happiness; go see an analyst, take time to engage into some soul searching. Embrace yourself.
That really wasnt worth posting twice ….hell not even once
Hesai’s either drunk or a troll. I’m guessing the latter
It’s funny how all of the guys who come on here start with the “repressed homosexual ” bit . I picturing this faggots getting a manicure while he posted this
It is really funny indeed… Why would they do that? Maybe its because this neomasculinity club is just very gay
You use the word “gay” like a pejorative. Why is that? Why do you attempt to shame men by implying or accusing them of being gay? Do you think being gay is shameful?
Most homophobes use “gay” as their insult of choice, I’ve noticed.
Wouldn’t surprise me. Chances are he’s jerking off to furry porn.
Nope . Just the same bit you always use . It’s either basement dwelling nerd virgin , gay , or tiny dick. It’s like you guys never developed any means of shit talking beyond a high school level
Why are you here repeating media lies about Roosh V when the MUSLIM RAPE GANGS are destroying Europe! THOUSANDS RAPED BY MUSLIMS!!
Hi Roosh V,
What I read in ROK goes against my political views. I disagree with you on the immigration agenda, I am not alt right and stuff.
However, I am really disgusted by what I saw online and depicting you as a rapist is a lie.
You are absolutely not pushing for rape, and you never did. Some of your articles are really edgy, but you are just exposing your ideas.
I am grossed out by the so called journalism. I mean are they reading correctly? What the hell is wrong with them?
The articles on game, and self improvement helped me more than any BS I was reading before, especially during dark times.
Your writings helped me build confidence in myself and i developed a better understanding of the dynamics between a man and a woman.
We are living really sad times, you have the support from an anonymous reader, you are a really brave man.
Besides, you made the French news (not the French Canadian).
http://m.20minutes.fr/web/1780571-20160205-legalisation-viol-comment-blogueur-sexiste-roosh-v-reussi-coup-mediatique
They talk about you as someone who got his buzz, but recognize as well, that you are no rapist:
”
Et il veut rendre le viol légal ?
Non. Reprise un peu partout, cette affirmation repose sur un billet « Comment stopper le viol » dans lequel il suggérait « de le légaliser sur les propriétés privées ». De cette façon, expliquait-il, « le consentement serait alors donné quand elle franchit le pas de la porte ». Mais le blogueur a ensuite précisé qu’il s’agissait « d’un billet satirique ».”
Long story short it was a fucking satire.
You have the support of an anonymous reader, I don’t agree with you with a lot of things, but what is happening is simply shameful for a big part of journalism.
Fuck that shit, I will keep reading your blog anyway.
All the best,
I think I’ve figured out what really terrifies women: They know on some level that “consent” doesn’t exist in nature, and that plenty of our ancestors came into existence through rape pregnancies. Yet these fool feminists continue to support degenerate elite projects which will destroy the civilization that maintains their illusions about the importance of “consent.”
Women are inherently drawn to violence, whether implicit or explicit.
No.
Why are you here. What about the MUSLIM RAPE GANGS. Roosh hasnt RAPED THOUSANDS. He hasnt done anything wrong.
I don’t have anything else to do. Did I say he raped anyone? No.
Care to elaborate?
Only for white westerners have feminists defined all heterosexual sex as rape and marriage as slavery. Consent never existed with savages. The matriarchal aboriginal tribes that emerged had evolved excessively large and bossy women. Towering western man lives under an un natural form of state imposed matriarchy. Western man and his societies would simply be too powerful and dominant to be yoked by smaller squat money changers and their paper rewards game. Western man must be kept docile like big teddy bears while their women are regularly hyped with feminist dogma. Right down to the long held generational tribal customs handed down within every western tribe, the state has attempted to skewer our very mating rituals right down to which gender makes the booty call. The current scenario is the bleakest it’s ever been for propogation of our tribes. I’ve seen the ”yes means yes” consent video shown to college urchins training them on booty call ‘etiquette’ where every move on the man’s part must be verbally requested and acknowledged. It is clearly OVER REGULATION of the whole mating process and is targeted at whites. It has the same effect as over taxing or requiring excessive insurance and tarriffs and licences that are intentionally gagued TO KILL a business by slowing it, bogging it down with regulation and driving it out to make way for the competition. It is also akin to OVER POLICING which kills autonomy, liberties and basic freedom. The net result is that the over regulated and over policed tribe ends up having zero population growth with a negative replacement rate.
I am starting to believe that the people that focus so intently on the concept of sex and “consent” suffer from some sort of mass mental delusion. Have you ever met someone who wants to talk about consent that doesn’t seem a little off their rocker?
Exactly right. Do you know anyone who ever lived that didn’t originate as a simple ‘glimmer in their daddy’s eye’? It was A GLIMMER that brought you, I and everyone alive into being AND NOT some stupid guidelines shoved down our college youth’s throats by population control social engineers.
Brace yourself , soon we will need permission from the other person to shake their hand , else we could be violating them.
Speaking of rape:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZyMc29QQK8
Roosh is being used by the LYING MEDIA to make you forget about MUSLIM RAPE GANGS!!
Making threats online is know as intimidation and you can be arrested for it.
Use of the internet to threaten “the person of another” constitutes a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875 ( interstate communication of threat to injure) If it is communicated interstate, federal jurisdiction is created.
Where is the tolerance from you folks?
Some genuine questions I do have is (1) Roosh will you ever get married? (2) If so, will it be a to a Western woman and (3) have you ever desired children?
Regarding the proposed rape on private property as a man I am looking forward to women invading my home any sexually assaulting me. After all I believe in equality! And just in case any men are offended by this I am being satirical. Perhaps.
What if they’re fat tho
He can always guarantee his escape in that scenario by running. Satire or not?
But then noble Imperator they could gather momentum by rolling and that could be quite the dangerous situation.
Exercise would be good for them. Consider it a public service. We could even have a “national rape a man day”. Its only fair we try to put something back into the community.
Perhaps but think of all the diseases you’d be swimming in and then there;s potential from suffocation from all the fat folds 😛
Good point. Maybe I will dig a moat around my house. You can’t be too careful…
Although fat does float 😛
I visit this site and read some of the articles , even though it mostly does not represent my point of views on different subjects.
But the reaction of feminists ,SJWs , and other stupid , brain-washed single-cell organisms is is beyond the line where I thought the stupidity can reach.
Nevertheless there is always a tiny light appearing here and there that brings smile to your face , usually where you do not expect to find it.
She is Quebec Montreal journalist , Sophie Durocher (https://www.google.com/search?q=Sophie+Durocher&oq=Sophie+Durocher&aqs=chrome..69i57.675j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8)
and in her husband’s ( Richard Martineau) talk-show
http://quebec.radiox.com/emission/martineau/article/roosh_v_un_tata_mais_pas_un_criminel
(in French)
under the title “Roosh V, un tata, mais pas un criminel”
(Translation : RooshV acts/think foolishly but he is not a criminal”)
she shows that she has actually read famous”rape” article and understood Roosh intentions ,which may not be clever at all , but nevertheless rightly concludes that article itself does not call to legalize rape.
I have always liked Sophie.
“But the reaction of feminists ,SJWs , and other stupid , brain-washed single-cell organisms is is beyond the line where I thought the stupidity can reach.”
Never underestimate stupidity mate , it’s like a pandemic now , reaching all corners of the universe and finding new ways to survive by ways of grouping up.
Just like the aphorism goes that there are two infinite things in the universe-the universe itself and the bounds of human stupidity.
Havent read the article BUT I have read numerous articles on this site and I have yet to read one where any of the writers have supported rape or violence against women. – So when I heard all news reports I guessed it was feminists and socialists that were behind it.
You are one of the very few people that actually got that. Kudos to you and your capacity to critically think , good sir.
the media is a lie
Why isnt the media covering MUSLIM RAPE GANGS?
They are using Roosh to DISTRACT YOU!!
And every time muslim rape gangs are being mentioned here , they always ignore it and sweep it under the rug like it’s nothing. Real rape is not important to them , bashing people here and acting high and mighty moral highground supporters is their number one priority , thinking like their shit doesn’t stink.
The media lies. The public allows themselves to be manipulated. Elites enable it.
It’s still the fault of the masses that they refuse to think for themselves , they like being ”with the flow” , apart of the sheep population.
It’s funny how recently there was articles on Salon praising pedophilia and claiming that pedophiles were “victims”, yet it basically caused little outrage. Why? Because that pedophile article was on the SJW’s side. Simple as that. Roosh is on the “wrong” side, so all SJWs go against him. He received a ton of threats and calls for him to be lynched by the medias, meanwhile pedophiles can write pedophile-acceptance articles on Salon and nobody bats an eye.
I am talking about this article : http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/
So basically a worldwide lynch mob bullies a blogger like Roosh while those same SJWs accept pedophile articles in their medias. Also don’t forget the same way that SJWs accept foreign gangs of rapists who actually commit rapes or deny their existence. The world has become one big joke. This whole story is a big SJW act of bullying against a single individual to assert their power.
Take solace; this incident has exposed them for the rabid ideologues that they are. We are winning little by little. They are getting nervous.
If there is one thing this story proved, is how without of a doubt the SJWs are the real bullies. We knew that all along, but this really confirms it. They doxxed him and send him threats, two things that SJWs claim they are victim of and cry about incessantly. They label all their opponents “harassers” yet they are the ones doing the criminal harassment. SJWs are pathetic evil hypocrites.
Sic semper tyrannis. They shall receive what is theirs in due course. Onward, men-we shall prevail over their vanquished pride.
They are bullies on the internet. Cowards in real life.
Why are you here repeating media lies about Roosh V when the MUSLIM RAPE
GANGS are destroying Europe! THOUSANDS RAPED BY MUSLIMS!!!
You really should have let the meetings happen Roosh. I know I am not in your shoes and I am not experiencing the bullying that you are facing, but at this point, whether you cancel the meetups or not change nothing. Stopping the meetups is not going to calm down that raging mob of SJW hypocrites one bit.
He didn’t cancel the meetups to calm the SJW freaks down. He cancelled them to protect us from them. He can’t guarantee our safety because these lunatics are out for blood. Regardless, there is nothing stopping us from meeting up tomorrow and from the looks of it, many still are.
Also; cut Roosh some slack.
I don’t believe this. Sure, Roosh might be a bit in danger, but random followers of this blog are not. “Safety” is exaggerated. Maybe a few people would have been attacked with a little violence. But I doubt anybody would have been killed or seriously injured. Do you honestly think feminist cunts would stab a man to death in the open? And if some SJW call you out, how hard is it to claim you don’t know what they are talking about? And if you encounter SJWs at one place, you can easily move somewhere else.
IMO Roosh could have easily stayed safely in a secure place while the fans meet among themselves. SJWs are pathetic cowardly cunts. They make a lot of death threats and doxxing online, THEN they call the police because they are scared of “harassment”. This is nothing compared to the kind of protests I participate in and the kind of people I deal with.
The dog without teeth barks the loudest; the crybullies I heap with scorn and contempt. May their fester in their own self-imposed delusion, hubris, grandiosity and hatred.
Why don’t you guys just have zoom broadcasts that way you can be in the comfort and security of your homes but still have the feeling like you are a part of the team??? Or some other way to have a live interactive media gathering and Roosh you can have these men that have died in the feminist movement pay a fee to join and register for your insightful inspiring information….
lol never :o) He wants slack he can open a chat room… this is PUBLIX BAYBEEEEEEE
Yeah Roosh..you should continue doing what your doing…must be so peaceful and such a stress free life you lead…everyone just loves a war and division…oh and death threats and mobs of angry fat white women with short ugly hair screaming and throwing tantrums…must be nice….Face it men are Gods and women are Goddesses the flesh is fleeting all this is pure nonsensical ridonkey lick ness and a way to get a following and make money online blogging…I am sure your pocket book was happy for a bit:)
I’m still going out, if i get bloody, so be it…
You will only be fighting yourself…mainly your ego and your us vs. them mentality ..hmmm Happy Fighting I hope it is only a flesh wound…
Liberalism is dead, it is for this very reason that leftist can not operate as a state, the left cannot defend it’s borders, people, or state. The us vs. them mentality is ALL! And leftists are too stupid to realize this and so they sacrifice the world, their neighbors, their children, their nation for the false belief that everyone hold their values when in fact their enemies use leftist ideologies for their own gain.
Hence the real reason the leftist establishment will go to all lengths to stop any new ideas and political base’s from forming, they are in a fight of survival. We are witnessing the death of system of thought which has been dominant
in the Western world of the last three centuries. Liberalism is losing
legitimacy. It is losing legitimacy because Liberal regimes can no
longer defend their borders, win their wars, pay their debts, or protect
their citizens.
It is inevitable, liberalism has had full freedom both internationally for decades and has failed in every sphere, politically, economically, and now militarily, so it is inevitable that the people will rise up to be defended and represented. Leftism has only ever existed in a bubble of media, academia, and politics in real life of the people there is us versus them and the people are tired of being sacrificed to “them”!
Perception perception perception …plumb line right down the center…balance balance…etc..etc..continued bantering is all futile… left, right, sad, fight…have good nights and make your spirit take flight
there can be no “law” written to make men equal, a strong man can not be made weak by a wish alone. oppression to make men equal is a lie that will not stand, and that lie will end in blood, lots of blood.
Everyone wants a say…everyone wants to influence someone on some level…oh to be greatly misunderstood and disliked is finding a most special fitting room big enough for your ignorance and lack of true empathy and deep spirituality you have made yourself apparent you young minded twit. Bless you on your journey of self awareness and growth…I speak as one twit to another…Namaste
Sarah, you have been manipulated by the media: http://www.snopes.com/roosh-v-43-countries/
Also, you are white. If you are truly spiritual you should look into traditional European spirituality. Leave the “Namaste” for those people.
So my pigmentation levels determine my spirituality as honoring the God in you as I honor the God in me…We are One Mr. Abo Antiquo bless you on your journey and Namaste…Btw how do you know my race we are the human race happy awakenings to you and all you see and do…Abo
Equality is a lie
Sarah….. Shut. Up. We’re all going to puke on you if you don’t.
Someday you will see Zeta…racism is a mental illness btw
It wasn’t a lie to Einstein.
No thank you
Liberalism is a mental illness caused by a damaged amygdela.
I can bet I have study the Vedas more than you. I am not sure what you are talking about “The god in me and the god in you”. That is a very narcissistic point of view that is not found in Hinduism. There is only one God, and I wish you peace on your journey as well.
Possibly…
Well, take you’re I am God God is me crap to a yoga party and spew it out there in one long stretching dog position fart…
Of course Sarah is a Narcissist
Yes there is only One God One Spirit One truth that ties us all together and the very breath we breathe …yeah we breathe the same air…I am sure you are much more knowledgeable than I am about the Vedas good for you…
I am sure I have had narcissistic times…but over all I genuinely love people and find this quite entertaining:) and I can’t sleep and I have never commented before on these types of platforms
Hinduism actually promotes a very rigid caste system, so again this progressive equality does not quite fit. One caste was not particularly seen as better or worse than another, just different. Interestingly, this is exactly what we contend with men and women. Not better or worse, just different. These differences should not be destroyed by feminism trying to make women into men.
:::pukes on Sarah. Big chunky pizza bits all over her::: whooopsie :o)
I agree there are definitely differences:)
Damn too bad it was puked up pizza cuz hot damn I love me some pizza….but only after I have chewed it up and swallowed it like a lady
I don’t care about the equality. I just want to plan an Indian wedding so my friends can paint me all over with little squigglies. Sarah is an ‘acceptor’ she will let you rape her and she’ll even grace you with forgiveness afterwards because hey…. She’s GOD and she can do that…
I am a part of God as are you and I thank God that has not happened and you will meet your Judge someday Unbreakable…and I thank God it will not be me:) Yes I am a forgiver because I have been forgiven
So here is sweet lil sarah’s deal. She’s a wanna be or ex MILF who is not aging well. She wears too much makeup, which doesn’t have the effect she wants, it gets into her wrinkles and makes her look even older. She tanned too much and now she’s splotchy. She wears her shirt off her shoulder on purpose in her photo even though it is not designed to wear that way because she wants you to see her as sexy but she really doesn’t want to take her clothes off because everything sags. You’ll never get her into bed with all her clothes off and she hates being on top with the lights on because her boobs hang funny.
Good that’s a start. See, nobody here advocates for any type of violence toward women. The Brahmin taught that every action carried out in the material world must correspond with a higher meaning in the immaterial world. We stand against the forces of evil here on earth for the sake of the immaterial God and His eternal battle against evil.
Oh… how completely Goddessly of you…. lol go suck on a tofu penis.
No thank you
You are a part of God Yahweh breath of life is in you…You are actually cracking me up because you are so angry why are you so angry???
angry? lol me? I am happy as a four dicked man is a free whore house :o)
Lol are you really a Jewish woman from Israel or were you trolling me earlier?
I am really a jewish XX. Baruchata Adonai Eloheinu Melech ha olam…..
I am also a comedian… lol
Yes because we had a long, respectable conversation before and now you are on a shitpost rampage lol
I am schitposting stupid libtard progressives tonight. Didn’t you get my agenda? ;P
You are funny very entertaining ..lol
MMM I love deep fried tofu dipped in spicy peanut sauce…delish
I also taught your man Zeta how to open an mIRC chat room last night because I knew you were gonna get bitchslapped on that article lol
Yes I see. I am curious how it is in Israel? I am not as familiar with the politics. I know Netanyahu is basically a Zionist, but do you guys have shitheads in the same way that we do here?
Sarah, honestly I think your heart is in the right place and I wish you peace. You must understand though that feminism is damaging to nature of people and destroys of the sacred polarity between men and women.
Shittards rule the world hun. They propagate right outta thin air. Bibi is not a Zionist in the true respect of rebuilding the Temple Mount. Those are mostly the Chassidim and ultra O’s. Bibi just wants to stay alive and keep his once pretty little aging wife in shoes and scarves without too much staff turnover.
Thank you Ab I am not a man hater or a feminist I am just a woman seeing that all this nonsense causes strife and we all have our gifted energies that we were born with and we need to stop fighting each other.
What are your opinions on what should be done with the Muslims in Gaza and such? Who do you support politically?
Are you actually Hindu? I am curious about your beliefs.
guh… really????? okay this is what I think: “There is a portion of both good and evil in all things. The trick is to determine the ratio and act accordingly.” ~J~
Ok. I’m from a place in America with a lot of Jews and some are very weak on it and some want to just Hulk Smash so I was curious.
Ok good I was thinking you were really angry….
Honestly, I think Israel has a right to exist but that was jacked up from the beginning. Britain screwed it all up. But, I can also say that Israel has put a lot of $$ into Gaza which Hamas, willingly blows to pieces every chance they get. Hamas needs to gooooooooo….. Iran doesn’t care about Palestinians… they just wanna kill Jews…. PLO had more compassion for Palestinians…. Hamas is a puppet…. now it is all a clusterfuk of angry people killing in the name of a G-d I don’t think either side truly believes in. In between the lines innocent people are killed and the only use they are is to show the media how bad the other side is…
Interesting. What is your view on Anti-Semitism throughout the world. Do you think it is very common in Europe and the USA? Do you think Muslims really just wanna kill all the Jews?
It has always been common. Everywhere. What is your view on it?
I meant what your view is as in how common do you think it is. Do you feel that everyone is out to get you?
yep I left it up all night.
haha you do not have a penis how can you be that happy I bet you really are a sad lonely angry bitter person and i am sorry for you…btw my sweater in the picture was not off the shoulder and I have freckles and a nice body so yes a little splotchy freckled face with a yoga tight ass body…I am sure if you had a dick you would be happy with me Miss XX Breakable let alone having 4 dicks in a free whore house…. man it must take a lot for you to be happy!!! Namaste with a long winded downward dog fart just for you Biotch!!!
Manipulated by the media…no that is not possible…you have a good night now Mr. Abo…I am only manipulated by my family…Namaste I am a free thinker..but once emotions come in you can steer my ship pretty easily….but I have an anchor that is able to stay in truth at all times.
Wow I do not know what happened to my last post…we are the humanoids dude I honor the God in me as I honor the God in you this is for all people…My great grandmother was from India btw…you make me laugh
now now Ab….. put on your pacifist mask and bow t other higher feminine energy. Get in touch with your inner chic. Feel the LOOOOOOVE…..
wth
I have these burning questions that I’ve had for a while after browsing through the articles on this website. Well written, well researched, but a lot of the things don’t make sense. I want to use the term “ethical things”, but that wouldn’t be completely right. Just some questions about your behavior and views on women.
In some of your articles, you have very backwards views about women. Why? What made you view them as just sexual desires, people who shouldn’t work? Why, in your article about 6 or 7 things to look for in a future wife, did you include wanting a stay at home wife?
It’s hard for me to fathom that any woman would accept those “rules” and just stay home and do nothing but clean and cook.
Also, I don’t know if you’ll answer, but maybe some others can help. Why is it important for you to have control over the life of your wives? Some comments in the aforementioned article state how girlfriends are banned from social media and their phones whilst in the presence of the s/o. Some go as far to ban their girlfriends / wives from having Facebook and Instagram. What comes of this? Why is it so important?
I think my least favourite comment on that article was someone saying that they had slowly ebbed out their wife’s family from the picture. If you don’t understand, they basically made sure that the wife’s family and friends were seen less, whilst the husband’s were seen more. He more or less banned his wife from seeing her own friends and family. That sure can’t be right, can it?
Lastly, one thing I never understood, was, still talking about the “potential things to look for in a wife” article, you state that she must have less than three or no prior sexual partners. You essentially pine for a virgin. Some other articles on this site boast about you and your comrades bedding women: virgins and “sluts”. How is that fair? You’re chastising a lady for having sex whilst you parade around your skills at bedding girls. You are essentially a man whore. Yet no one calls you out on it. But you call out women. Come on mate, double standards.
Anyways thanks.
EDIT: “The Seven Things I Require In The Future Mother Of My Children” was the article name.
Very good points. ROK is a very diverse website in which you can find many opinions. On one hand, you have the PUA people, on the other, the more “conservative” one. We may not agree, but learn from each other.
And, you can find all sorts of information about how to clean the Cheetos orange off your fingers without leaving your laptop, 10 ways to wank off without worrying about your Mom walking into your room, How to dress a blow up doll…. lmaorotf
I will address your points , as i view them and i am not speaking on behalf of all of RoK , i am only speaking on behalf of myself.
1. About the stay at home wife : simple logic , in poorer countries the minimum wage is something about 200 euro. If the man and the woman have kids and they both work , someone has to take care of them , so they hire a nanny , which costs , guess what , at least minimum wage , so one wage is effectively worked for nothing. At the end of the day , who do you prefer your child do be raised by , by you or a stranger ?
2. Not everybody wants to have control over his girl/wife , i am all for freedom of both parties , but i take the liberty to flee on the first sign of red flags.
3. About the number of partners , again , i’s basic logic , the more she had , the more instability that means , an incapacity to stay with one person for to long , which means a failure at long term relationships.
4. About the double standard , yes , it definitely is a double standard , but who said it shouldn’t be ? If you take the time to research , there have been proven facts that women can pair-bond less and less with each subsequent partner , whereas a man does not lose that ability. It’s just biology.
At the end of the day , everyone gets to choose who to be with and i would never enforce anything on anyone , it is just what i ask for in a woman and she is free to leave if she doesn’t like it , just like i’m free to leave if i don’t like her expectations. Simple as that. Hope i shed some light. Cheers.
Thanks for addressing all my points!
Now for my counter points.
1. I have two aunts who are married, have kids, and both my aunts and their spouses work. One of my aunts works in law and her husband is a scientist. Both hard working jobs, yes? They just drop their children off at their parents’ place or at another family members. Now with what you said about poor countries, I understand that it would be difficult to do that and so in cases like that I understand if that were the case.
But a lot of the people on this site live in well to do places where they have stable careers and get paid much more than those in poorer countries. Would it be that hard to have the wife work as well? One of the parents, husband or wife could work part-time to also be there for the child. This is what I would do in any case.
2. Maybe not everyone, but the comments I read slightly worried me that maybe the man in the relationship was being that tad bit too controlling. Especially with the family comment. Marry her, make her take your last name, but to ostracize her from her family is just a bit too much.
3. That makes sense, but again, how do you know it was the woman who ruined the relationship? I understand that in some cases women are the ones who get attached and clingy, but men can do that just the same. But then maybe you have women who do what men do, going around keeping score of the men they’ve bedded. Maybe you look down on that and call them “sluts”, and maybe that goes back to my point of double standards which by the way …
4. … they exist, they’re unfair and sure maybe there is research going into proving things like this, scientists studying bonds and all that. Really if we just managed to lose the taboo of many partners for women, maybe you guys wouldn’t have trouble finding a good wife, (unless you prefer virgins and that, in that case carry on searching) and less shame would be put on girls who do sleep around.
Thanks.
Hey I read your comment and thought they were very well thought out. I basically identify myself as a liberal who has become very disturbed by the marxist position liberalism has shifted to in the western world and view this website as a good counterpoint to that.
Having thought over the problem/debate you are thinking ov
Well i personally am not shaming anyone , i just don’t want my future wife to be like that. Like i said , everybody is free to do as they please. I offer quality companionship , loyalty , honor and principles to stand by to and i expect the same in return. About the first bit where you said you could just drop your kids by , yes , you can drop them by at their grandparents of course , but children , at least earlier in life , truly need their parents in their lives and not other people , including imediate relative. Children always ask where’s mommy , where’s daddy , not where’s grandma and grandpa. I have a friend that grew up incredibly alone because his father works in another country and his mother would drop him of at his grandparents for 6 days out of 7 every week. He turned out a recluse , a basement dweller and however much people from the exterior tried to help him , he never got over the fact that his childhood , the most important phase of a human`s life , permanently destroyed his oppurtunities in life.
So there are scenario’s like that and sorry to hear about your mate. I do agree with you when you say that the mum and dad are needed early in the life, and whilst the grandparent option could work it is also a tad foolish because of the early stages of life baby.
But let’s not forget this point was about a wife ever getting a job in a marriage. After the baby has grown to a reasonable age what’s stopping the mum from getting a job? I guess every family differs and every mindset is unique.
Nobody is stopping her. The question is why , not why not. What would you prefer between staying home without a care in the world , raising beautiful smart children to get by in the world while the husband takes care of the financial issues , or being a slave to a bunch of people at work , busting your back to make another one rich , while your kids get tossed around between institutions with possibly strange , dangerous people that couldn’t care less about your kid and just being there for the salary at the end of the month ? That is my question. I know what i would prefer , i would prefer to stay at home and raise my kids , but i can’t. I can’t because i’m a man and men that do that are not respected. But women that do that get a whole lot of respect. Not from feminists , sure , but they do get it.
Edit : typo
Well that’s you. I know that for myself, I love working and working hard. If it’s at a job I love, I’m not going to think of it as busting my back to make someone else rich, but just as doing something I enjoy which at the end of the day has a bonus for me.
I think that the whole stance that men who don’t work aren’t men to be respected should be dropped. I realise that it won’t be easy as just typing it up on the internet and hoping everyone who reads this comment will change, because honestly, it will take more than that. There is no shame in the woman being the primary bread winner. It’s just the ego of some men who won’t let it happen; men who believe it’s shameful.
I guess coming from someone whose gender isn’t judged on how masculine they are, how much money they make, it’s stupid. I don’t fully get the pressure on you guys to work.
Also , that double standard is everywhere. In Phillipines men are expected to have sex with as many girls as possible , so they can have the experience to choose a good one for a wife. When they do finally choose a wife , they almost always choose a virgin , and it’s a win-win situation. He gets the pure girl that was intelligent enough not to give sex to everyone that asked for it , and she gets the experienced man that can take care of her , including sexually. How is that bad ?
You can’t argue with basic biology dear Tyne , and i say that with the best intentions. Men everywhere and in all of time and space before us preferred and prefer , virgin or purer girls. That is what we’re attracted to for long term engagement and attraction cannot be negociated , however much people want to enforce the equality and the abolition of this double standard. You can have as many sexual partners as you want , but be sure that high quality men will not like that and will avoid you.
That’s a shame I guess. Not too soon to change that mentality, eh?
But I understand how it’s been like that for a while, and it probably won’t ever change. Even with all of this info, and this may seem slightly childish, but why so much name calling? You may seem to find it disgusting if a woman has slept around, but you don’t really need to publicly shame her, do you? But opinions are opinions, and it seems like ours differ.
And with your second comment, if you put it that way, it’s not entirely bad. I just assume it’s a bit naive to think that this double standard will soon ebb away.
I never publicly shamed anyone , and i never will. I fully respect people`s privacy. We don’t see eye to eye , it’s not a problem , at least we can talk civilized and that is enough for me. The double standard is not a social construct , it’s something in nature that cannot be changed unless forcing yourself to being attracted to someone you’re not. That is the lining which raises your question of why this double standard won’t dissappear … because it can’t.
Think about it this way. Do you care how many sexual partners your ex/present/future boyfriend/hushand had/has ? I suspect the answer is no. Women usually don’t care about this. But we do. It’s as simple as that , you just have to realize that there is a possibility that there is a whole gender out there that thinks differently then your own.
It wouldn’t bother me because, I can’t even say why it wouldn’t bother me. It just wouldn’t. I guess that’s what you mean by us being two genders, two opinions and whatnot.
Well if the double standard will always be there, then there’s nothing much to do about it. I personally do not agree with that, but that’s just two contrasting opinions.
Hey I read your comments and thought they were very well thought out. I basically identify myself as a liberal who has become very disturbed by the marxist position liberalism has shifted to in the western world and view this website as a good counterpoint to that.
Having thought over the problem/debate you are thinking of, I believe the answer is as follows:
It is fine (and for many quite healthy) to be promiscuous, but it is bad to be slutty.
There is a huge difference between the two of those, and for me at least, but as I define it, I love to date highly promiscuous girls, but slutty girls tend to be damaged and someone I could not even imagine starting a family with.
So a lot of the actual debate comes into the nuances between what it means to be promiscious verses slutty.
Very simply, we have a lot of very bad social programming in our society that teaches people to be emotionally fucked up/shut down inside, constantly mentally fixated on sex, totally disregard our own inner world or self development (instead wanting to make external things be our support base/thing to worship), highly enslaved to the consumerist paradigm, and most importantly not be able to be at peace or settled with anything and instead have a restless mind that jumps from place to place without being able to connect.
I think its natural for people to have sex and connect with each other, but due to our puritian roots, the USA especially is highly sexually repressive and instead of people being in a natural sexually free state (where its say just cool for two people to meet and vibe and fuck and its not a big deal) there are all tons of ideas/social conditioninings/conflicted thoughts/hoops to jump through etc to fuck.
This means that most girls when they choose sexual partners constantly get bored with whoever they are seeing and look for the most exotic emotional stimulus to give them a dopamine spike they are pavlovianly conditioned to seek out. As a result, over time the general core and ability to connect with partners or be intimate basically gets killed (as opposed to say cool tantra girls who can be fucking 10 guys and are amazing to be with).
There is a big tendancy to self hate/be insecure etc that our culture pushes on women, and when girls go in the mindset they are only willing to hookup with guys if they are drunk (Which is basically 50+% of millenials) because they can’t be promiscious from a clear and conscious state of mind, it builds a lot of turbid self conflicting emotions in them which gaurentees instability in a relationship. Additionally, since they continually will seek out people who abuse them, they get patterned to have a lot of self hate and insecurity inside which is basically an endless abyss to go into if you come from the perspective of wanting to be kind and heal them.
So slutty basically means having lots of sex in weird situations where you are heavilly conflicted over it, being driven by a lot of subconscious impulses and typically being degraded in the process.
I think that for guys, playing in this whole game is also damaging and degrading to them, but its much more common for guys to err towards the side of being promisicous than slutty, and women biologically/energetically are much easier to damage/taint by having them take on bad energy than guys.
From my own life experience, I have had multiple women I dated who initially were drawn to them because I thought poorly of their character and treated them less than kindly. Overtime when my heart opened up to them and I started treating them well and really going out of my way to care for them and support them and listen their problems try to help them etc, they went and bounced on me with some guy they met in a bar or something who scarred them within a day of meeting.
Shit like that is very concerning in terms of someone you would get married or hitched to, especially due to the fact the courts are highly in favor of giving women significantly more of a guys assets than the deserve.
I am able to find girls who are cool and are not like this, but they are rare to the point it is very very very worrisome. As a guy you are basically put in the position that unless the girl is just cool and moderately emotionally healthy (which is rare), you have to take an adversarial position to keep her from fucking you over and ditching you. I believe a lot of this came from feminism being deliberately engineered and created to be a divisive thing within the lower class in order to further the aims of the global elite (Which is basically what marxism does over and over and over historically).
From having looked into this extensively and talking with people in the intelligence services, I think the situation was deliberately engineered, partially to drop the population and partially to set the stage for a large war in the future with the islamic world (who unlike roosh regularly brag of violently raping and assaulting women but are given a complete free pass by the left…and within europe a lot of the signs a civil is brewing are starting to emerge).
I basically don’t think the original christian patriarchal order was ideal or the best thing people can hope for, and not something I would personally aspire to, but the alternative we’ve been given through the deliberate destruction of our social institutions is significantly worse and has resulted in a fractured miserable unhappy significantly poorer population.
There are definitely a lot of men on here who are a bit more misoginistic than me, but there are also tons of compassionate sane people who have become very concerned about the direction the culture is heading in, and because of how aggressively any degree of dissent is squished by establishment, this is one of the only places they can aggregate.
Thanks for reading, I hope that wasn’t too many challenging contentions to look at simultanously. Apologies if this was written in haste and was unclear/typoed
I’m starting to understand the edge with slutty girls here, after some researching. First of all, apologies if I didn’t understand everything or sound a bit dumb, but some of what you wrote went over my head because I’m tired as fuck but I want to reply before I forget.
So. Sluts, sure, maybe they’re broken inside, or something like that which makes them incapable of having long term relationships. Promiscuous girls are basically “sluts”, but have constant partners, yes or no? From definition, I understand a slut is just someone who fucks anyone willy nilly, and that can be a bit disturbing to think about if you do want to wed her.
I want to know, (without being too specific, aye? :)) would you ever bed a slutty girl, or is it just too .. blegh. Disgusting to think about.
Feminism, was created for other things, you know. Not just to fuck over men. I’m gonna be the typical feminist and just go all out and say feminism benefits everyone, we all need it, it’s not just for women but for POC, LGBTQ+ and all that yadda.
The original Christian patriarchal order is in my opinion, outdated. It’s like so many of my fellow Muslim families (yes shocker I’m a “moslem” bite me. You know I’ve found some appalling spelling of “Muslim” here, you guys never fail to amaze me.) where the men and boys are boosted to higher places with more help. I think if a family wants to follow the original patriarchal order, they can. But it seems you and me both think this order is not as ideal as others.
Also about your remark on a free pass for Muslims on rape and assault. I don’t agree but I don’t disagree. You may find I’m not the most conventional of Muslims. Predominately Muslim countries are some of the most backwards in the world. They hold on to beliefs of patriarchy which I believe should have been let go long ago. Different topic but it angered me how little attention the sexual assaults and crimes that happened in Cologne, Germany got. They were essentially were ignored by the wider media, and by that they were ignored by the world.
The society has become shit enough that people are proud to be seen as “damaged”. They take pride in it, and whilst they shouldn’t be afraid of whatever disease the internet concocted for them, they definitely shouldn’t parade it around.
To be honest with you, I actually agree with a lot of what you said. Given my feminist status you may think I’ll jump to the defense of sluts but, (and apologies to anyone who thought other wise) I just think they’re a bit to excessive when it comes to sex. Whilst I won’t shame them I sure as hell am not going to support them.
Whilst the double standard between men sleeping around and women sleeping around exists, I’ll state that I don’t like that double standard. But going on with that, I don’t like people who just spend their nights and days sleeping around, man or woman. Unless a relationship comes out of that encounter, why would you even?
I understand my reply really isn’t much of a reply to yours but my eyelids are droopy, I agreed with a lot of what you had to say, so what was the point?
The problem arises when you judge men and women using the same standard in the sexual marketplace.
I’ve always found this to be silly.
I mean, we are two different sexes, with different biological functions and wiring.
There has to be different standards. That’s the only way it makes any sense.
I guess.
Although I have read in some places that women feel as much sexual urge as men, and like men, they may go around feeding that desire, but not like men, are the ones that get called out on it.
If you really think the different standards thing will work, then that’s you. I personally think the only way to be equal is to drop this standard all up. But like someone told me, it will be hard trying to make society change its views on sluts.
I find the pining for virgins laughable. Look at the wealthy, powerful men and most of them have one thing in common: They don’t marry virgins. I think men who sleep around too much get emotionally damaged and are unable to have a healthy, loving relationship. Roosh is the prime example of that, if you go to his own site you will see the posts where he admins he wasted his life with the meaningless random sex. He knows sleeping around is a bad thing, that’s why he turned away from the pick up artist business and started pursuing higher purposes.
Sluttery and hookup culture is bad for both genders, it damages the individuals who indulge in it and corrupts the society in the long run. The men here say women who slut it up until they get too old end up lonely and depressed with 40 cats, but the men who do the same don’t end up any better.
I agree with you when you say sleeping around is bad psychologically for both genders. The pining for virgins is somewhat understandable if you come from a culture where it’s very honorable to lose your virginity once you’re wed, for men and for women. But in this day and age, yeah, maybe it’s easy to laugh at, especially when you think about the men here who sleep around but want to get wed to virgins.
Agreed , you must embody what you want in the opposite sex
IMO this whole story shows how scary the medias can be at manipulating people. They basically claimed it’s a meetup of “rapists”. Accusations like that get people lynched in third-world-countries (whether they are true or not). Being labeled a “rapist” is a serious accusation. The SJW journalists are literally encouraging lynch mobs with their lies. Except unlike the witches of old times, it’s now men that are victims.
Lives. In. His. Mother’s……. wait for it……wait for it………..BASEMENTTTTtttttttttlulzlulzlulzlulzlulz
Why are you here repeating media lies about Roosh V when the MUSLIM RAPE
GANGS are destroying Europe! THOUSANDS RAPED BY MUSLIMS!!
Oh hai Zeta :o)
hai
How are you?
Tired from shitposting for dayz
The why are you doing it? You know life is too short to live in misery.
Misery is fun thats why people live it
^^ not miserable. Ever. Life has got too much to offer.
45/32 truly beautiful
Haiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Zetaaaaaaaa …… you got a room????
Mom! They’re being mean to me!!! AGAIN!
Why do you hate women you misogynist? You spend all this time on Roosh
and ignore the THOUSANDS OF MUSLIM RAPES happening in Europe. You are a rape apologist for Islamic Rape Culture!
Ohhhhh yeah… the iggy thing for us ferocious females lol :::looks around::: I thought Anon was gonna ddos you guys….
they got roosh’s adress
yeah figured they would as soon as I saw he’d called the cops. He’ll be fine. He did a schtupid thing. People pay for schtupid things. :o)
One of the things learned from red pill is that PUA and MGTOW are the same man as he ages and matures. The neomasculinity is interesting because a solid beta male with red pill truth will go from PUA to family man. Masculine truth knows and understands the value of family to the survival of a nation and civilization. The SJW types seem to have no clue.
Make no mistake about what has happened here. The media has propagated a lie in order to suit a feminist narrative with DEVASTATING success. Feel the true power of the feminist establishment and watch how they have installed FEAR into any man that holds an anti-feminist view, no matter how innocuous. You will be shamed, you will be slandered, you will be doxxed, you will be threatened, you will lose your job, you will be made to live in fear. THOUGHT CRIMES are now a reality. You will bow down to your feminist overlords or you will pay.
Have you ever wondered why the feminists/establishment are so silent on radical Islam? Because real misogynists are terrifying. They are afraid that if they criticise Islam they will end up dead. It’s that simple.
If violence is not the answer can someone tell me what is?
Well…. how do you portend to enact this violence?
I don’t portend to enact any violence. As I said, if violence is not the answer can you tell me what is?
Is this a Jeopardy question? Do I need to phrase the answer as a question?
I’d just like to say, long time lurker, well really like a three day lurker but I’ve read enough articles to say this. I will out myself as a woman and feminist, (hate on me if you will, I’m not the one sending death threats.) and came onto this website when I heard in the news about a “a leader of an American gang promoting private property rape planning meet ups in Australia” I was shocked and angered at first, like many of the population. So I searched some, found out who Roosh was, what he did, watched his “36 Things Wrong With American Women” video which made me hate him immensely.
I come on this site expecting the same bullshit and I did find some articles that some would find sexist, misogynistic and all the terms in between. I read Roosh’s infamous rape article and I realised that the media was twisting everything. The media is pretty infamous for that, if you didn’t already know.
But none of the articles here are full on “LET’S RAPE THE SLUTS BECAUSE WE ARE MEN”. You are a group of men discussing what you want in women, what you don’t like about women, sluts, and some health and body articles which I haven’t gotten around to reading. I’ll say this once, I don’t agree with anything on here. If you ever encounter me in a comment section that’s not this one, I will be challenging you and everything you say, possibly some cussing because what better way is there to rile up some men on the internet?
Continuing, I just wanted to say I feel sorry for you all. The people you see commenting here who are women and feminists haven’t, I assume, taken the time to read the articles on here. They’re going off of the media and the media lies.
On Instagram a couple of feminist pages I follow (yes shake your head in anger at the feminist go ahead get rid of your anger) were all posting the names of the cities where y’all were meeting, and some of the captions were just “STAY AWAY FROM THESE LOCATIONS, LARGE MASSES OF MEN ARE GOING TO MEET HERE AND ATTACK WOMEN TO RAPE THEM”. Were you guys going to do that? No. Probably not. I hope so. They just read the title and BAM! angry “feminazi” or SJW. I read further in, researched, watched and listened to come to my own conclusion that you’re not like that, but just a group of men exchanging tips and thoughts.
I’m not on your side in the long run, encounter me again on another article and I’ll probably not be as polite. Whilst I don’t agree with what you say and your thoughts, I can see that the media did you wrong and have twisted one article by Roosh to name you all as rapists. So cheers for listening. Or reading.
Also Dawn Of Justice is out soon and nfd awrugh kngskln oir I don’t think I can wait that long.
You’re free to disagree with everything here. Certainly no one forces you to agree or even be here. After all it’s a site for men. But it’s good that you realized how much the media lies and manipulates public opinion to smear anything that does not conform to the politically correct narrative. If all this ruckus at least makes more people realize this fact,. it will not have been in vain.
Yeah. I originally only came on this site because of what was happening in the media, and now I just read whatever articles I can find. Not that I agree, just because, I don’t even know why. I’ve failed the feminists lmao.
Read RooshV’s article on brewing the perfect tea (he posted it on his own site, not here) that will be one article you will agree with.
I’ll get round to it lol.
You keep reading it because it has truth in it. People crave the truth. Keep reading, you’ll keep discovering more about yourself and the world we live in.
Not exactly. I read because it interests me, not that I find any truth in it.
Being a feminist, you usually only get the feminist’s POV. This site gets me other views, surprising ones, some stupid ones, and some truthful ones. So yeah, maybe I find some truth in it, but mostly I just read it for the different views.
The ‘protesters’ sadly were directed to go after some straw effigy, another misdirected cause. Larger world conflicts co opted and fought by proxy and mercenaries are no different. Ever have a nibby neighbor henpecker that talks shit on some other neighbor and tries to rile a crowd of the community against them? They talk shit on someone unknown and try to get others to form an opinion against them and to follow some plan of skullduggery. I always meet the target victim person myself to see if they’re the devil that the whack job shit talker is making them out to be. I had a neighbor myself, a single mom on head pills who couldn’t go a month without warring with some new neighbor. She tried to get me to join her lynch mob and I told the sorry old sap to shut up, go inside and learn to cook and sew. It was sad for her kids. The dumb ‘b’ couldn’t or WOULDN’T even sew a rip in her kid’s pants if her life depended on it. She was too busy warring with neighbors and grappling with her hormone imbalance after her nads got yanked (hysterectomy) due to shitty trans fat diet. She fed her kids the same box crap and and the outrageous noise from their house . . please. She followed the state socialist service advice to discard and divorce rape her hubby years before and from the frankenfood diet, the whole house of mom and her daughters was fraught with un naturally high T levels. They were all like mutant monsters. THE PATRIARCH in that house would have malled some sense and order into that wild brood of self destructive she beasts for sure.
HAIL THE PATRIARCHY!!
Well that’s an unfortunate situation involving the mother and her children.
Once again with the “go inside and learn to cook and sew.” I just don’t agree that that’s the only purpose of a woman (as well as becoming pregnant.) I for one can’t cook and my sewing skills are less than admirable.
From what you’ve told me this woman doesn’t seem like she’s in the right place to have custody over her children. IN that case, it may have made more sense for the husband to take care of them if she was that neglectful. But I guess in any courts the custody of the children have a 90-10 chance of going to the mum.
I appreciate that you approached this objectively. That’s all anybody can ask. Thank you.
Agreed.
Even good women can take the red pill and learn…great comment Tyne, and much appreciated.
I am furious to see the back lash you are getting and will continue to call out this sensationalism
I have been reading this site for ages and thought it would be left alone was shocked to your face on my news feed! I am a scottish woman and ashamed of how everyone is buying into this lynch mob !
I almost want to be flattered by this after the research I’ve done. The article over which Roosh was called a rapist was satirical and from what I’ve seen he is a good writer. A far better writer than myself. But no this isn’t Roosh or some fake account. I’m just a 23 year old woman that has spent her birthday engaging in conversations on this site to learn more and have been fascinated by the point of views I have seen expressed on this page. I wrote a lengthy college essay that addresses how feminist movements have had a negative impact on society. It wasn’t warmly welcomed as expected.
Although I think there is some harsh over generalization of women done in some of the articles I’ve seen I can’t say that it isn’t true. There are a few areas in which I don’t entirely agree. But after talking with members I’ve seen that many hold the same idea that I do. The idea that to obtain equality feminine traits and roles need to be as equally praised and valued. Instead I’ve seen women trying to become masculine and basically act like men as their way of being equal. Not all but a lot. They don’t realize that this is only making sexism worse not bringing them equality.
Seriously read some more and actually talk to the guys on here. I can’t believe how far the media strayed from what’s actually going on here. Just because they hold unpopular ideas and beliefs does not mean they’re completely wrong. In my experience it’s been the unpopular beliefs that often hold the most truth.
“I wrote a lengthy college essay that addresses how feminist movements
have had a negative impact on society. It wasn’t warmly welcomed as
expected.”
You might be interested in looking up a clip on you tube featuring Doris Lessing- she was one of the founders of the Natl Org for Women.
Well, after only a few years, she had to quit the org she helped found, citing how it had become filled with nothing but “vindictive divorcees and man- hating lesbians”- the key words being vindictive and hate.
Feminism really took a dark turn in the early 70s…
Although the original intent was good it was executed poorly and by the wrong people. I think we resort to hate in areas like this because hate is easy. It’s incredibly easy compared to the alternative of enduring and leading a life that inspires change. Thank you for the info that will be the next thing I look into.
Although it’s not a subject I like to touch even with those I trust, I have suffered unbelievable cruelties at the hands of men. Acts far beyond rape and much more sadistic. Did it make me vengeful towards men? No. Am I afraid of sex? No. Am I weaker because of it? No. Much stronger in fact. Did it instill vengeful anger in me? No. Instead I felt challenged to better understand both men and women. Did I engage in unjustified acts of violence? Absolutely not. Am I now a man hater? No. Instead I starve to see men step up as true men and find themselves in their own masculinity. I honestly believe this would help decrease rape and violent crimes towards women and most likely change women’s view of men for the better.
“No. Instead I starve to see men step up as true men and find themselves in their own masculinity. I honestly believe this would help decrease rape and violent crimes towards women and most likely change women’s view of men for the better.”
As a woman, I can’t agree more. I strongly advocate for men to find true masculinity and also to raise their sons the same way and raise a standard for their daughters’ future partners. Real women need real men. It seems there is a lack of both in today’s distorted society.
Funnily enough, I am also a woman in my 20s researching into the extreme outrage surrounding ROK and Roosh. I’ve read close to 50 articles and comments and although I don’t agree with all, I agree with much of what’s been expressed. The rise of feminism has stricken society at the core level of marriage and family and while I stand for the rights of women to be women, I also stand just as strongly for men to be men. For those interested, the bible portrays the perfect woman in relation to her husband and family. I dream of a society with more men, women and families with these characteristics: Proverbs 31.
If you wanna go down that rabbit hole, look up who funded it (and why).
Although I do not believe in the Christian religion there are good points made in the teachings and a lot of the traditional set up of a family as suggested in the Bible seems to be a healthy Foundation and something we should strive to return to. I’m glad to see another like minded female on here. Like you I can’t agree with everything that I’ve read but they hit the truth in a lot of what I’ve read. It’s been very refreshing to see the change.
Thank you
Happy birthday
Roosh, I have been very critical of you but I must congratulate you on your courage and thank you for keeping this site up.
Roosh is one of my favourite people to read/listen to online.I admire his honesty and logical breakdown on topics such as game and what not
For all the new visitors and for the already existing members I’d like to recommend you the work of Henry Makow, especially his book on feminism – “Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order”
http://www.amazon.com/Cruel-Hoax-Feminism-World-Order/dp/096877251X
His research is very thorough and perhaps not as extreme as Roosh.
Well, Roosh, I have a question. Is that you from 6:00-6:14 in this video? Pax! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZDv-_AhHKA
keep on standing your ground roosh, many of us are trying to get your real message across and to debunk all the accusations and articles like this are really helpful in that regard.
the whole red pill and free speech community need to form a square around our most extreme voices so that the progressives know that we won’t leave any man behind.
all our activists need to know they will be supported otherwise they will all start to self censore on tough topics.
As a regular reader of ROK, I do agree with the general idea of ROK of embracing masculinity and opposing the migrant invasion, even though I disagree with some such as bashing Islam. I know that this place is a community and the ideas of everyone here varies. This site also help me to improve myself especially with women and coping with social anxiety.
I do feel saddened that the international meet ups were cancelled. However, we can learn from the leftists that they would use any means necessary to silence us. These leftists will one day see that they have no power to silence us.
It’s nice to see this article, taking advantage of the increased attention likely to head this way. We all now that SJWs and others will ignore it and continue to fabricate new slanders, but regular people will come and immediately hear the other side of the story. And, since the truth of the matter is so obvious, we win twice: they get to see the site for themselves, and they get a fresh chance to see the perfidy and contemptuousness of the social “justice” mob.
Our brief addition to the discussion:
http://www.amerika.org/politics/in-defense-of-roosh-v/
Basically, SJWs are a plague and need to be smashed by any means necessary, even if I personally do not like the topic matter in question. $0.02
Roosh, You’ve hit it world wide! even here in place as insignificant as Croatia, News papers are trying to slander you. http://www.24sata.hr/sokantno/legalizirao-bi-silovanje-zene-su-kurve-za-sebe-bih-hrvaticu-459653?utm_medium=Status&utm_source=Facebook&utm_content=459653&utm_campaign=24sata+Facebook+status
I can help but grin at the exposure RoK is getting! 😀
Wanted a location. I enjoy the articles on the website. I wanted to Attend the meeting in my area. I want to know when the meetings are resceduled. Now it’s all canceled and I’m past the cutoff date so I have no comments or book receipts to send in. Can anyone help me out here? BTW , I’ve spent hours reading articles on this site. I specifically searched “rape” and “legal”. There is ZERO postings on this site advocating rape. The uneducated backlash of people on here only further proves the message this site is trying to spread. Guys, ROK, followers, don’t engage in feminist, swear filled, name calling with these people. It takes credibility away from our message. People listen to roosh because he’s well spoken.
“Legalizing rape is a notion so insanely absurd I never imagined that people would take it 100% seriously despite the fact that I wrote an entire essay clearly explaining all the reasons why I think rape should be legal with zero indication that I was being sarcastic, then bizarrely claimed the essay was a “thought experiment” (which actually applies to all writing and thinking) after the negative backlash, then pretended to be surprised that anyone took it seriously when in reality I’m basically a shock jock with delusions of being ‘sensational’ and ‘interesting’.”
The fact that the left is willing to go to any lengths to silence Roosh only tells you how scared they are.
Of what exactly?
Truth.
He doesn’t care. He’s been here since yesterday posting the same exact circular argument, over and over again, and no matter what it said to him he continues to do it. He’s very passive aggressive and isn’t interested in anything anybody has to say that is in conflict with his views.
Remember, when we engage people like him, we aren’t talking to *them*. We are talking to everyone else who is here, curious as to what is going on with no opinion one way or the other. Always have your audience in mind.
Right, I understand, I’ve counseled others the same myself. I just wasn’t sure if you were familiar with this particular troll or not, he’s been posting the same exact circle of nonsense for nearly two days now. Some people are still taking him seriously. If you knew that already, my bad.
It’s extremely odd that you consider asking “of what exactly?” is “trolling” – it’s like the answer is so obvious that merely asking is some kind of offensive affront, like asking a cult member about their basic belief. For instance, if I asked you “truth of what?”, would you be able to provide a simple clear answer without insulting me?
“Instead of focusing your anger on real problems in your neighborhood, city, and country, the media has made you emotional against a man who poses absolutely no threat to anyone. I’m being used as a target so that you can expend your rage on me instead of other entities that are genuinely hurting your standard of living.” I wish I could put this on big, bold black letters for new visitors.
For those who keep bending over in front of @disqus_4nEWAdq13z:disqus
Enough. Stop feeding her ego already. This kind of pedestalization irriates me. She said something true and that’s it. She is still woman and enjoys being fucked by badboys. You guys look like male feminist as you continue to pedestailze these creatures even at ROK.
Agreed, although whom she does or doesn’t fuck is not important. What’s important is the fact that many have started acting like a bunch of betas just because some supposed chick stroked their egos by agreeing with them.
Yea, I get what you are saying. The reality of a reasonable woman at this precise juncture of time and space (online space) is simply too much for most men to handle…sad times that she is such a minority. I was following that thread earlier, did not see anything too bad, maybe some ridiculous things were said after I left…
Seeing the bigger picture, and in various spheres of modern society, I am of the opinion that a big reason why western women don’t respect/admire western men like they used to decades ago, is that now that they can be in traditionally male environments (maybe even most of the time) doing pretty much the same things as men, they don’t value most males in the majority of what they do.
Alongside this, they hear men talking about current social events and male issues a lot more.. but they don’t see men actually doing much about it and label us ‘whingers’ whenever we talk (in places such as ROK), when being masculine is supposed to be more about decisive action than words.
In my opinion the writings and discussion of topics relating to the human condition should never be considered an anti masculine activity. Indeed the greatest thinkers, writers, speech givers and discussion leaders in human history have been men. Many men excel at language usage and have developed finely tuned abilities to express complex ideas and mental constructs, which in turn have benefited society greatly over the centuries. If there are some women who find that “unmasculine” it only goes to demonstrate their own shallowness and lack of human knowledge. Being a man is whatever we men decide it to be, and if we lead, they will follow.
May I just say, most people are dumb, and don’t know how to critically analyze. I’ve read a few of your posts, and they are thought provoking. I find your site interesting and informative. Haters gunna Hate.
Thank you for being objective and giving the site a fair view before passing judgement, James.
When you first started this site in 2012 I came to look around. I had a fairly lengthy conversation with you, and I can say from my own experience with you, that the flavor of most of what you are saying here is garbage. I don’t think you are so much pro-rape, as you are pro-Roosh, and pro getting whatever the hell you want, regardless of who it might hurt – and if it hurts a woman, so much the better. Enjoy the adulation of your minions. It’s probably all you have. Say hi to your mom, and try and get out and get some sun.
TL;DR: “please talk to me again!”
Dang it, that’s exactly what I was thinking when I read her post. You beat me to it.
One paragraph is too long for you to read? well, there’s your problem. lol
What’s funny is that the reading comprehension problem seems to be coming from your camp, sweetie.
The demonizing of other points of view on this website it what sets it up for all the attacks. You get what you put in to the world.
You keep posting hoping to get some kind of attention across several threads that I’ve seen. While it is true that I am giving you some right now, it’s only to inform you that you’re being silly and perhaps you can find better things to do in life than try to sneer at people you’ve never met.
And that’s the first and last post I’ll make to you.
I’m a pretty firm believer that a lot of people react in a negative fashion out of fear. Now, the entire “rape culture” thing as it compares to the world of PUA is interesting. I say this because when one learns that there are psychological principles that work in terms of affecting other people, it can be scary when you finally realize that it can also be applied to YOU. A lot of people go through life with ideas such as “The media doesn’t manipulate me!”
I’m a guy who was young when the “Pet Rock” became popular and seemingly everyone felt the need to have one, so don’t kid me about it. (Silliest damn thing!) I’m also aware of military/govt. PsyOps and they aren’t that picky about sex, they wish to be able to manipulate and/or control large groups or individuals through psychological principles. Advertising is based on the same.
So, for women who believe that they are in total control of their interactions with men would naturally be a bit frightened that there are men who have learned how they “tick” and actually use that information. Whether they use it for good or ill says more of the man. When women declare that this is to promote rape, well, they are merely acting out their fear while ignoring the factual basis of psychology.
I think ROK has valid points, and i think they deserve better representation in popular media. I really do.
However, i believe i have legitimate complaints about mens rights activists AS A WHOLE. I know im critical, but I would like to see ROK use less ad hominem attacks, conspiracy theories without sufficient evidence, name-calling, thinly-veiled emotion-based “reasoning”, blanket statements that are patently untrue, disproportionate basis in religious literatue that is at best inspiring fiction, and immediate, vitriolic condemnation of contrary opinions. I dont have specific examples of any of these right now, but I can find them easily, and so can you if youre honest with yourself.
I am willing to agree with ROK on many points. I am not a liberal, I do not like feminists, and I think white men get a bad rap. You want to prove youre better? Then do it. Actions mean much, much more than internet comments.
I agree with what you say. Immature and emotional behavior, name calling and blatant generalizing need to go. But I must say the content of the site has improved a great deal since its initial launch. I quit reading for a while cause I couldn’t stomach the frequency of the vitriolic stuff, but there has been a huge improvement over the time and high quality contributors have joined, so i started reading again.
Generally, what do you agree and disagree with on this site? I’m talking the contributors more than the comments. I know there is a lot if frustration in the comments *which I understand, though I don’t agree with it).
@Roosh how many black women have you dated and what is your opinion of them as dating material? I have dated my fair share of Nubian Prizes and I find the ones of first-generation Caribbean, South American or African origin (i.e. not “African-American” slave-descended) can be quite sexy and feminine. Oh and not fat, liberal and obnoxious.
Hey Roosh, its great marketing…every once in a while when you want to drive numbers up, you just announce the possibility of another meeting. Boom, up they go….tons of free advertising and you know what they say in Hollywood, there is no such thing as bad PR. You could do this just for the lolz of watching the SJW hysteria show, and they could also help make you more cash too….and you know, I do kind of like the idea of the SJW crowd contributing to your revenues…lol…after all, we all have to do our bit.
neomasculinazi
I believe all you “men” that are in this “group” or support it are nothing but wimps who are struggling between religion and homosexuality. Why else would a bunch of “men” group together privately to talk about sex and rape? Because these “men” are setting up gay gangbangs to do each other’s booties. You “men” just don’t want the outside world to view you as gay so you put up this macho bullcrap. Your “group” is nothing but a huge gay hookup group.
He clearly said he isn’t for rape, yet you keep repeating it like a broken record! Honestly, if you don’t like this site or the meetups, you don’t have to have anything to do with us-just look the other way.
Your ignorance is showing because you obviously have never read any of the articles here. I have and imo its a great resource for men…read 10 articles, then come back and comment from a more informed position.
Regarding question 7 (“Mate if you come to my city I’m going to kill you.”), yes, you should all definitely fucking escape to Russia and Saudi Arabia. They hate minorities and freedom as well. Hetero men in the U.S. are not under attack..it’s called equality, and those of us who do not suffer from an utter lack of insecurity can handle the shift. Embrace change..it is inevitable and you will become (or already are) relics if you don’t get on board with what the rest of us are calling the 21st century.
If a man thinks he’s a women you have to accept it or you’re a transphobe.
This girl thinks she’s a cat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyTpk6xyzzk
No one cares. Good for her, embracing her true kin.
Roosh wants to organize a social outing, attacked.
I’d like to take a census of all the women who agree with our views on this site . please either thumbs up this comment or leave a reply. To help keep this census as accurate as easy as possible to deciminate ask that no men respond to this comment.
I don’t agree with anything on this site, yet I don’t disagree with everything. Some of the well written and well researched articles do make me think and I find myself nodding my head (to my own annoyance lol). But in saying that some of the other articles where there’s lowkey women bashing, I find myself boiling up and angrily cursing at my laptop whilst I try to think of a polite way to convey my thoughts.
Although with the people you can encounter in the comments, them I hold in contempt. Some bash women, bash Islam and literally everything I stand for that just doesn’t sit well with me.
One of the articles that I found here which I did agree with was talking about the neglectfulness of the media when it came to the mass attacks in Cologne and things involving migrants.
Overall not everything here I agree with, it’s not as bad as I was led to believe.
If that answers your question.
You can disagree with a lot of articles here and that’s your right to do so and that’s fine. I do think though that there’s a big difference between something like ‘hey you are wrong there that’s not right because….etc etc’ so you can give an argument to show where its incorrect and ‘wow you want to rape women its says so in your article you misogynist virgin’ et etc
Oh, I see, you guys are afraid of women AND criticism. Thanks for deleting my posts. You’re a bunch of little boys who run to mommy when you get scared as proven by your “fearless leader” Hardly the definition of real men.
Out of curiosity, what would say the definition of a real man is?
Do not respond with insults or sarcasm, it is an honest question with no malicious intent. I’m interested to hear your angle.
@Bryon…ROK is an excellent resource of information for men. Read 10 articles, then come back and make your comment again from an informed position…as opposed to the ridiculous one you currently hold.
What the fuck are you talking about? Quit the usual feminist shaming bullshit and actually come up with up with something of substance please.
Roosh V the muthafuckin GAWD, driving blue haired fatty neo-femcunts into a frothing rage. But they’re not mad at Roosh, they’re mad because his ideas make sense and negate everything they stand for. And thanks to their antics, his message is spreading far and wide.
Rooshv the ‘Salman Rushdie’ in the blog-sphere,
Roosh V singlehandedly exposing the media for the lying propagandist shills of the Left that they are.
*derp*
I’ll buy you a pint if they ever let you into England.
GREAT ARTICLE ROOSH – BUT THREE DAYS TOO LATE!
Too late to educate and inform tens of thousands of visitors to this website.
Too late for your followers and supporters to use as defense during the attacks.
Too late to inspire free and independent media to quote for balanced journalism.
I won’t presume to know what you’ve had to deal with in the past week, but I would’ve expected this much sooner if supporting ROK is any kind of priority for you. You could have done this and still played the “I’m coming/not coming’/let’s meet/don’t meet/meet in private” games. Ultimately, I doubt this was managed in the best way and am divided as to whether it’s done more good or harm to the Neomascilinity movement. I’m disappointed because much of your writing and its message really resonates with me.
I’m not on the forums, but if a member shares my sentiment and could repeat this message where the man himself might possibly read it, I’d be very grateful.
This article shoud have been posted earlier, and definitely should be pinned to the top of the page. I cannot imagine the traffic uptick in the last couple of weeks, and it’s a really good way to set the record straight.
media wants blood buddy. I would give it a week and the next news cycle will start. I would have a meet up day every month mentioned and called off until leftist crazies get tried of tracking you and go after the next shiny object. That’s how you get to be mainstream.
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xaf1/v/t1.0-9/12670305_579513078864597_5529507089135124567_n.jpg?oh=8e3b53552ea10d7988ab70ddcc39e0e4&oe=57705F41
https://daryushvalizadeh.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/wkth2yt.jpg
Are you one of those Daily Stormer spambots?
I’d imagine that a majority those who frequent this site have similar living situations…
http://deadstate.org/anonymous-doxxes-pro-rape-blogger-reveals-that-he-lives-at-home-in-his-mothers-basement/
Take heed at the time wasted through dispute.
A false claim takes more time to disprove than create, which
makes slander a volatile weapon.
From what I heard, women throw their beers in your face. I can guarantee I would do the same. The way women are talked about on this site is absolutely appalling. And thanks to the publicity, we know your face now, and can immediately laugh in it if you approach us.
Not only that, but you are one hairy, ugly ass motherfucker.
Multi-colored hair – check
Bernie supporter – check
Livestock ring through nose – check
Interested in “men and women” – check
Studying social work – check
Checks out on all fronts, gents.
Congrats. You can read. What’s your point? Do strong, unique women bother you? What am I saying, of course they do.
Ha! Lists “1984” as one of her favorite books!
Again, what’s your point?
Please get fat and find a pair of problem glasses. You’re almost there.
You can’t grasp satire, so of course you wouldn’t recognize irony.
Oh, sweetheart. I know how incredibly attractive I am. Some lonely creep sitting in his mother’s basement won’t change that.
Does your boyfriend know how much time you spend thinking about Roosh?
We constantly laugh at the people on this site.
Does he know that you think about Roosh when he’s inside you?
I wouldn’t want that Chewbacca looking motherfucker anywhere near me. Not only is he a disgusting human being, but he’s terribly unattractive. Which makes it even funnier that he thinks he’s some kind of master with women.
You think about him constantly. You haven’t stopped thinking about him for days based on the amount of posts about him that you’ve made. It’s bordering on obsession. Does your boyfriend know how much time you spend each day thinking about Roosh?
Ok, baby doll. Have fun in your delusion 🙂
You’re thinking about him right now. You can’t stop thinking about him and coming here to tell him what you think about him. Does your boyfriend know that you think about Roosh more than you think about him?
Your cracking me up man, but seriously don’t feed her anymore. She may lash out violently at the nearest bearded man she sees :/
I usually refrain but this one was too much fun, and she made it so easy. 😉
How long do you think it’ll be before her beta pet Red Pills?
Looks, sounds, writes, and thinks like every other SJW, feminist, progressive, Marxist sloot.
Is “unique”.
“Constantly.”
At least you admit to your obsession with Roosh. That’s the first step towards acceptance.
I’d say it’s inevitable mate.
She’s publicly threatened violence against Roosh and shown her true colours. No need to further antagonize or doxx her. I know you can be the bigger man here. Peace!
Wasn’t doxxing – all of her info is public.
But you’re right. It was fun while it lasted. Peace brother!
Unemployable-check
Hear hear Kirsten! Beautifully said, I am in the same boat as you.
Every day I am saddened by the social decay that surrounds us, while the natural order that has existed since we crawled out of the dirt dissolves. Our heterosexual male-oriented men-folk have become the biggest minority of all, one statement I heard that has always stuck in my mind was that “white middle-aged males are the most persecuted group on earth”. In the end, the only truly logical conclusion is that all of this mess is a result of rebelling against the natural order.
I especially feel for those women who are looked down apon for just wanting to live their lives as was expected 60 years ago. For a long time I had to deal with feeling ashamed for just wanting to stay at home with my children, to bake and clean and knit and provide service for the Man who dutifully supports his family. But slowly I began to see more and more women come out of the shadows, who were pushing back against the feminist movement, who were standing up to say But I don’t want a career, I want to be a Mother!
Feminists think that they have given us the right to do whatever we want to do… Well M’am, Sir, erm… Whatever, I want to be a lady!
Mostly I just wanted to say that I’m sorry that your meet-ups had to be cancelled Gentlemen, please keep fighting the good fight. Anyone who has any degree of intelligence will come here to read if this is truly all about what is being portrayed by the mainstream media and will immediately see that it is all lies and defamy. Thise that don’t.. Well, they will probably picket the next meet-up, and every one after that.
Which by the way I have to say, I do find it fishy that there is a world-wide outcry against ROK for reasons that aren’t even accurate… I suspect many of these media companies reporting on this pro-rape group are headed by high-powered, bitter c*nts and this is a world-wide conspiracy to try to keep Man supplicant.
What is beautiful about the media wanting blood, is that it is their blood that will be first spilled!
Some say we’re going too far.
I say we’re not going too far enough.
Care to expand on that?
Sure
I would call you people misguided. I am wrong. Each and every one of you are nothing more then props. You are really nothing more then ignorant, air-headed cockolds who in all likelihood, havent had sex since you were squeezed out of your mothers rectum
You write like a woman. Besides, why do you care if we are “nothing more than props?”
We know 1 thing 4 sure – he’s a coward. Look the army punk mma clown when threatened by brothers in the US did he flee his home? Pathetic!
Ahhh Roosh…I really, really wanted to hate you! 🙂 I scanned your content out of curiosity and it looks like you became the flavor of the week. It will pass. Go do your thing and peace be with you.
Cunts like you insult men AND women. ESAD, fucktards.
Sorry mate. There were a few big words in that article. Don’t worry yourself over it. Better run along now.
Sounds like a bitch.
This article uses a strawman argument so straight it’s like it was created as an example of what a strawman argument looks like.
Each of the “questions” is designed to make those who oppose you look like vile monsters while you look like a paragon of reason. You literally have a question saying, Q: “I still hate your fucking guts.” and Q: “Mate if you come to my city I’m going to kill you.”
You then segue into questions like Q: “Well I don’t think you’re actually pro rape, so what’s your platform neomasculinity about?”
You’ve created a fake enemy who’s points are as weak as possible, the very definition of a strawman, and then made them concede to your argument. You don’t want to actually address any of the legitimate points people might bring against you. Things like, “Why don’t we just teach people to ask eachother if they want to have sex and be clear about it?” or “Isn’t it true that while there are highly publicized cases of false rape claims there are also many cases of rape claims with reasonable evidence that are discredited? What are your thoughts on this?”
I know you won’t read this, but I hope that somebody does and sees the flaws in your thinking.
Seeing that pic of Roosh at the top makes me throb with desire for his hairy asshole.
ALERT: Kirsten and other women here are Fembot infiltrators. Do not interact with them.
What makes you think that?
What a shame this escalated how it did.
The “men” on this site and others like are not at all strong or protective of women. They are easily threatened and intimidated by women. Even when those women have less than them they will feel strong feelings of resentment, and will routinely throw women under the bus while declaring virtues of chivalry.
All they want is power over women and their right to control them and never lose that.
They don’t care about actually protecting women at all.
The only women they do like are women that lick their small little balls and massage their fragile ego.
Call yourselves boys, little fellas.
— A. Real Man