Culture

10 Words The Left Have Forever Ruined

210 Comments

As the cultural war rages on, the hypocritical left have managed to remain consistent on one thing: overusing their grab bag of buzzwords to the point these words have no internal meaning.

In actuality, leftist buzzwords are defined by their external effect—the emotional pitch in which they are expressed. In other words, the more passionate and angry one sounds uttering these words, the more correct they are assumed to be. For years, the media and popular culture have given the left carte blanche to employ this tactic.

By doing so, they have gotten intellectually lazy. Today, your typical leftist argument tends to cobble these buzzwords together into a string of sentences that, ultimately, contradict each other. In essence, the left have mainstreamed double-think.

Below are ten words you should more than faintly recognize. Let’s do our best to make these words great again…

10. “Systemic”

“Systemic” is an important word for, as an example, understanding holistic human health and the root causes of illness and disease. It can be a handy word for broadly explaining how organizations operate at their core. Unfortunately, the left—particularly social activists—overuse the word to describe institutions they deem to be racist, homophobic, or sexist.

Broad statements can be useful when prefacing specific evidence, but these activists spout “systemic” as evidence in and of itself. Their trick is to use the word with extreme outrage in order to inflate its credibility as matter of fact. “Systemic” is deployed with a deliberate vagueness so a person cannot exactly prove or disprove it. Your only option is to try and shout louder than your opponent.

As The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro put it, vaguely saying there is “systemic” racism is like going to the doctor and saying “I hurt”.

9. “Trans”

The man on the left, Shaun King, claims to be black

There was a time when “trans” was a reliable prefix for “across or beyond”. It used to  spice up the verbs written in an odd email or two. Sentences always read better with a little “transact”, “transpose”, or “transcript”. However, “trans” is commonly used as leftist shorthand for “transgender” and now “transracial” (see above photo). It is now difficult to hear the word without imagining some short-haired academic’s soft, belittling voice lecturing you on the importance of tolerating “non-binary” individuals.

8. “Conversation”

By design, leftists use vague language and buzzwords to mask the shell game at the core of their ideology.

Funny how the left often say “we need to have a conversation about x” when they have proven time and again to be the least willing at conversing with conservatives. When the left say “conversation”, they really mean “we need to have a conversation about a topic you must agree with me on”. This allows them to control the parameters of the discussion and dismiss any deviation or counterargument as a “distraction”.

For instance, after the latest jihadist attack, the left will not engage in any “conversation” about Radical Islam. After an incredibly uncommon mosque attack, however, the left scramble to converse about “Islamophobia” and the radicalization of Western white men. The left have politicized the public forum and removed any intellectual honesty worthy of real “conversation”. It’s hard to have a “conversation” with a group of people who are only about acquiring moral and political power.

7. “Problematic”

To be fair, this word was always kind of irritating. But, yes, some things in life are genuinely problematic (eg. you failed your midterm, you lost your job and your monthly rent is due, you lost your car keys). When it comes to political discussions, though, everything is so “problematic” to a leftist you start to wonder, “why even debate then if every idea you encounter is a problem?”

This is at the heart of why the left have become so averse to free speech: when confronted with a challenging idea, they dismiss it as “problematic” and attempt to shut it down instead of unpacking it deductively. Granted, at least this is a leftist’s nonviolent way of managing ideas that hurt their feelings.

6. “Privilege”

 

There was a time when privilege was a good thing. The word opened speeches to express how honoured a speaker was to receive an award or call upon a respected guest. It was a humbling label one cherished and received with gratitude.

Now, privilege has been co-opted by the left as a shaming tactic to make you feel bad for having things or looking a way you cannot control. Way I see it: we should feel fortunate to live in a society with a playing field that allows for privilege. In many developing countries, next to no one has special advantages due to a lack of resources and free market. In the West, we should feel privileged to have privileges. It is proof we are the best.

5. “Phobia”

The left always finds ways to trivialize mental illness. In reality, “phobia” is an actual anxiety disorder that induces irrational behaviour. Is it irrational to criticize the ideas of Islam (Islamophobic)? Is it irrational to criticize legislation that criminalizes the “misgendering” of someone (transphobic)? Is it irrational to criticize the influx of unassimilated migrants into Western Europe (xenophobic)?

Even if the left is using “phobia” figuratively and do not believe it literally causes anxiety in people with these opposing views, they still have to prove those arguments are irrational. Rather, leftist leaders use “phobia” to push political agendas and, in exchange, have allowed the Right to dismantle this idiotic term in the culture war. Unfortunately, allowing it to exist in the former is more dangerous than the latter.

4. “Tolerance”

Yes, tolerance is—was—a good thing. Sadly, the left—habitually compelled through some postmodern urge to distort value-based words until they have no moral standard—take “tolerance” as far as tolerating intolerance. If you criticize a minority’s cruel religious custom, you lack tolerance. If you criticize normalizing mental illness, you lack tolerance. Ironically, in a culturally and morally relative society, this form of politicized “tolerance” has become the new absolute.

3. “Inclusive”

Like Political Tolerance, “inclusive” has been utilized by leftist activists and institutions to legitimize any new self-proclaimed “identity” claiming marginalization and victimhood. However, when it comes to groups that do not share the left’s victimology or politics, inclusivity ceases to exist. Take the cop ban at Toronto’s Pride Parade or the shutdown of pro-lifers at last January’s Women’s March. Once again, leftists take well-meaning euphemisms like “inclusivity” and move its goal posts to accommodate and enforce their backwards ideology.

2. “Diversity”

Globo-cuck and king of “tolerance” Justin Trudeau.

Diversity is a strength—when it comes to diversity of thought or diversifying your stock portfolio. The left, however, have hijacked “diversity” when describing their multicultural utopia. “Diversity of ethnicity” is now assumed to be a virtuous end in itself, irrespective of that group member’s own merits.

Embracing this type of diversity is simply reverse discrimination—including someone because they look a certain way or have a certain background that completes your multicultural furniture display. There is genuine “diversity”, but the word has been misappropriated by the left ad nauseam that it has lost its true value.

1. “Hitler” (Literally)

cartoon-hitler

While the “Hitler” comparison to Trump has reduced itself to parody, its overuse reveals a key facet of the left: their rhetoric undermines the evils in the world they claim to crusade against. All this bluster about “Hitler”, “KKK”, “Rape Culture” is spouted so liberally—to forgive the pun—that it trivializes real Hitler (a fascist who annexed part of Europe and commanded the extermination of millions), real KKK (a Democrat-created secret clan that lynched blacks), and real rape culture (which has infested Western Europe via the international migration crisis).

As conservative commentator Gavin McInnes observed, due to the left’s infantile worldview “Hitler now just means a guy”.

And this is only scratching the surface…

What other words have The Left forever ruined?

Read More: 5 Buzzwords Liberals Use To Smear Dissidents

210 thoughts on “10 Words The Left Have Forever Ruined”

  1. 11. Awareness
    Heard that one mosly in the 90s when the snowflakes were running around “raising awareness” on pet social engineering projects. Typical leftist virtue signalling.

    1. breast cancer has 100% awareness now! cure in sight yet? nope

      1. “Raising awareness” is alot easier than getting a job or actually solving problems. That actually takes personal effort and discipline.

        1. Just like Bono’s charity, all for AIDS awareness and not for actually solving the problem.
          If there were any justice in the world that money would go straight to Charlie Sheen’s back pocket.

        2. Bono is the guy I think of when I hear the word “hypocrite.” I enjoyed a U2 concert or two in my youth, but his preachy bullshit and advocation of socialism all the while incorporating his band as a Dutch Holding to avoid the Irish tax man is a bit much. Another champaigne socialist whose neck is begging for a noose.
          At least he isn’t raising money to supply African warlords purchases of weapons like Bob Geldof did in the 80s (Band Aid).

        4. IIRC, Geldof “saw the light” after finding out where the proceeds from Band Aid actually ended up. He pretty much said “Yeah, not doing that again!”

        6. All those pompous cocksuckers need to shut the fuck up and go back to being performing monkeys.

        9. they’re entitled to their opinion but at least they’re not sanctimonious assholes unlike the Leftist regressive retards.

        11. Aren’t you so proud of yourself. The difference is that they don’t go around expecting the general public to do one thing while they do the polar opposite. Case in point Clooney who has a heap of properties and is an open border advocate yet has fled England and has never house 1 ‘refugee’.

        12. Doesn’t matter.
          The point is, entertainers with whom you agree politically can have opinions; ones you don’t agree with… not so much. You’re as hypocritical as any left wing nut.
          Ps: Nugent has bragged about bullshitting his way out of military service. How patriotic is that? Jimi Hendrix was liberal as f*ck and he served. Nugent is a f*cking moron and I would RELISH the opportunity to say that to his smug f*cking face.
          On to Kid Rock: he’s a f*cking poser through and through. He talks about being “straight out the trailer”. His dad owned a chevy dealership when he was growing up. The closest he’s ever been to a trailer is when his pops took him camping in a trailer because they were too big of pussies to sleep in a tent. And don’t even get me started on his music. His biggest hit was two parts lifted directly from other people’s songs and some tires ass contrived lyrics over the top of it. Give me a break. What a f*cking phony.

        13. They all can. I don’t like being preached to or spoken down to.
          As far as Nugent’s alleged draft-dodging, it doesn’t say much about him. So I largely don’t pay attention to him. As far as Kid Rock, never knew that and it’s a gimmick then-if he’s a phoney so be it. I pay attention to more learned individuals who are not media figures.

      1. that’s was an occult belief before modern physics provided support for it

        3. that’s either the bottom burps of uranus sped up really fast or the rolling stones played backwards. Wave / particle duality might suggests both

        6. no big deal.
          Although some of those crazy people on the comments seem to think it’s Satan melancholy weeping or something:
          Airck for instance says that “SATURN WORSHIP IS YOUR REALITY” and tells us a lot about cubes and temples and stars.
          You must have read the comments what do you think it is?

        7. How can the bottom burping of uranus be nothing? I’d get that checked with a doctor if I had that…

      2. Vibrant. The snowflakes aspire to live in a vibrant, multi-kulti hood. Until they get mugged, beaten and raped.

      3. But it really makes girls tingle. If you can pretend to be Law Of Attraction and talk about a girls vibration… softens her right up.

    3. Yes, “raising awareness” as if the fucktards are actually accomplishing something. I hate that.

  2. The phobia part is a real pet peeve of mine. It’s really irritating to see how easily people have adopted the use of words like “Homophobia” and other such crap when they really are very wrongly used. I try as much as I can to correct those who use these kinds of words but rarely do they listen or even care.

    1. It is a word swap done by faggots. Instead of stating things the way an Alpha would, “You scared of ….??”, they instead label it a phobia. What they mean to say is intolerant but that is redundant considering they are more intolerant of your intolerance. Just that one word, phobia, begins a spiral of circle jerks that only appeases the listener until you are no longer in their presence. The word isn’t said to change your mind but to influence you to call the speaker right.

      1. Oh absolutely, I don’t doubt that. And good point about them being more intolerant of people being intolerant of homosexuals. You either smile and accept their shitty lifestyle, or you are a bigot. And of course, most of these “tolerant” people aren’t actually homosexuals themselves, same in the case of people that defend blacks from any criticism and label anyone racist. Virtue signaling at it’s peak.
        I’m comforted by the fact that they will always remain a minority. A loud, vulgar, disgusting, spineless, minority… but a minority nonetheless.

    2. Keep it up. Language is the raw material of thought. Don’t let them control the language.

    3. Same here, and I go out of my way to openly “edit” people who say it around me (usually they get the point).
      When a position is simply and more rationally declared as “anti-XXXX” for whatever reasons you held valid, the SJW will always diminish your logical assertion by twisting it into “XXX-phobia.” They focus only on the idea that you might have fear, which can be exploited.

    4. It is about reducing the meaning of things through words to then generalize them.
      e.g. gender is a reduction of the meaning of sex. Reduction of meaning means that the words are now compatible with their degeneracy, and their inferior capacity to see a higher meaning in things(being humans). Generalizing is possible because of this reduction, otherwise they would be exposed as being different, so it has an equalizing effect.
      Those with a higher meaning are easily differentiated from those with a lower meaning, but the reduction of meaning, makes everybody equal(“everybody has a gender”).
      Homophobia is associated with “homos” raping children. Abused children develop a “phobia” against “homos”(pedophiles) But their reduced meaning represents “hate” or “intolerance”, generalized to demonize those who oppose them, to censor their opinion, thus is that homophobia is a word that allows them to hate normal people in public. Calling others “homophobes” is the same as calling normal people “victims of pedophilia”(a projection). Its original meaning alludes pedophilia, so they are reducing the severity of pedophilia, by defining it as something normal. Notice then how sick they are…
      Machismo as something bad, is the reduction of the meaning of being a man. Easy to generalize because all men are machistas by definition for being intrinsic, something that has been extremely favorable to women. But the reduction of the meaning of this word allows them to accuse all men of being evil. Allows women to hate men in public.
      When they can’t invent new words, they seek to change its original meaning as something positive and normal. Other times they seek to change people themselves, e.g. A whore is less than a wife, so they seek to turn girls into whores(equality), etc. etc.

      1. Good explanation. I more or less have the same conclusion about this nonsense but you’ve worded it perfectly.

    6. I call it Homonausea-it’s more apropos because it isn’t fear they evoke but disgust.

        1. Excellent. To beat those reprobates we need to change the game in terms of language and refuse to use their terms and instead barrage them with ours which are more succinct, descriptive and effective.

    7. As Mark Steyn puts it, being called something ending in “-ist” (racist, sexist, etc.) is respectful of your intellect. It means you’ve at least thought an ideology. Being called something ending with “-phobe” (xenophobe, homophobe, etc.) means you’re just infected with a sickness, and all you need is a nice doctor to cure you.

  3. And this is why I like my small redneck town living where the only concerns I come face to face with is 1) my job 2) working on the race car during the week and 3) running said racecar on Saturday night.
    I could not live in a big city surrounded by all these retarded SJWs. I’m sure I’d be fined for breaking some kind of ignorant social justice law.

        1. Yes but if someone puts more work into setup, is blessed with driving talent, or has the money to spend on the best of everything then there’s clearly inequality and therefore you must punish the hell out of it. Lol

        2. that’s why only communist issue blue lada racing cars that do 0-60 in, well as quickly as the workers can push them that fast, will be allowed in the future

        3. White guys now are treated kind of like restrictor-plate racing.

      1. Can’t say they don’t exist round here but at least they’re mostly hidden away doing their own thing without making a big scene. Don’t think the locals would give them too much positive attention.

        1. They don’t thrive well away from people. Most of the time a small town provides the community and support that prevents people from going to the internet to find support in the form of sodomy.
          At a county parade today I saw maybe half a dozen SJW fags -if you don’t include the county democrats.

    5. Indeed. Most of the evil ideas in our world come from people living in cities, cut off from nature and reality.

        2. a lot of would-be spelling bee champs whiffed on the spelling of “pregnant”- hard one there

        3. What an amazing testament to the K-12 ‘publik skool’ system all across the country.

  6. 11. (Micro-) Aggression.
    Every thing that can be the least bit hurtful to these grown children’s unstable physical, emotional, and mental state is seen as an aggression.
    “This guy put his hand on my shoulder trying to fit by me on a crowded subway. Rape!”
    “He said I looked nice in that dress. Creeper! Sexual harassment!”
    He’s wearing a shirt with foreign countries sport’s jersey. Cultural appropriation!”

    1. “Micro” aggression is pure insanity. Those words are the tools of the cry-bullies.

    2. I don’t do Micro. If I do aggressions it’s always Macro or nothing.

  7. “I do, and it really must suck to be you” is the best response to give to people who claim you have “privilege.”

    1. I suppose I am privileged.
      So privileged that I get to run the rat race to an early grave, with a 50 hour work week and a 140 minute round trip commute.
      Maybe if these powder puffs majored in something that didn’t end in the word “studies”, they wouldn’t be paying off their student loans on a Starbuck’s salary.

      1. Personally I hope they keep up this talk of “privilege,” especially in a snooty, condescending and lecturing tone like you’ve most likely encountered. 🙂
        I don’t think they realize it turns people off to whatever their cause might be.

      2. So true.
        I’m priviledged because I worked two jobs through graduate school and still managed to hit the gym 3 nights a week at 11pm.
        Meanwhile some unemployed dickweed whose writing career never took off supports Bernie so priviledged guys like me can pay for his Dorito ass that is apparently too good for manual labour.
        It’s easy for leftists to brush this off as stereotyping, until you actually meet enough of them.

        1. Don’t forget “privilege” talk is an outgrowth of intersectional feminism, which states that every injustice in the world is caused by white heterosexual males. It is bigoted talk, and the people who use it either openly hate white heterosexual males, or subconsciously do.

        3. Right on Clark. I spent four years in Uncle Sam’s Airplane Fraternity sweating my ass off on the tarmac in Florida just so I could go exploring operating nuclear reactor containment buildings in a plastic suit and respirator for the next couple of decades. High heat and radiation exposure are some privilege, huh? The only way these snowflakes are entitled to a damned thing I’ve earned is if they were going through the airlock with me…

  9. 11. Immigrant.
    The left has succeeded somewhat in changing the definition of this word to include illegals. We should always push back by using the proper words in response.

    1. “Colonist” is a better choice, unfortunately. Depending on the situation, of course.

      1. I’d describe any foreigner who comes here and who insists that we do things their way as a colonist.
        An immigrant in a traditional sense would seek to embrace the traditions and culture of his adopted homeland.

  10. Problematic. Oh lord, the word problematic.
    Another word: clunky.
    Any sincere storytelling in media with sincere positive messages about the good things in life is clunky

        1. I don’t.
          It’s a necessity. A biological drive that consumes most of my thoughts and my income. If I lost interest in sex I could achieve so much more in life. But I believe it will never happen.

  12. Perhaps equality is another one but I guess that was already liberal in the first place. I prefer liberty.

  13. So…..no article on Laci Green and how she got fucked (fell on some dick) and became a fan of the red pill?

    1. Never heard of her.
      Just googled her.
      Could be the charter member of the Miss Piggy lookalike club.

      1. She can. But the big thing that just happened (she is pictured in this article for problematic) is she started dating a fellow YouTuber who is anti feminist and for all purposes, red pilled. Could make for an interesting discussion considering how some feel feminists are anti white male or two far gone. I have bedded a few feminists but think the community at large needs a better understanding of them in the sexual realm. As long as they aren’t fugly anyway.

        1. I have to admit I have no deep understanding of them at all. They are just shrill lefties to be avoided, as far as I am concerned. But I understand your point. Bedding is one thing, but the guys who actually marry these weirdos, that is something else. I often see these types of married couples on the train commuting to work. Never understood how a guy could do that to himself.

        2. Same here. Just assumed it was low T and a general giving up on finding an attractive mate and convincing yourself they are a ‘soulmate’. Whatever keeps them away from the streets with signs, flyers, and chants works for me.

        3. Would show once again that all this “social justice” crap is a shit test with women looking for a man with fortitude who asserts his leadership in the relationship.

    2. Prove that feminist only need a good fuck to be cure. So those horrible feminist orcs are lost.

      1. There are 2 sides. I think most die hard feminists are much more desirous of beta bucks than alpha fucks. They want a man to subsidize their illusions and bigotry, and are very pissed when men resist.

    3. I don’t buy that she’s “red pill” at all.
      More like she, alongside many, saw the wind blowing in a different direction and decided to hop on it. It’s only relevant because she is more famous than other feminists.
      Which is whatever. She’s a woman, they always jump on whatever is trendy, and being anti-feminist, anti-SJW has definitely become the popular thing now, while being a feminist is very unpopular.
      I find it disgusting, however, just how quick the anti-feminsts(or better yet, the Skeptic Community) were willing to overlook the things she’s done and said in the past and were welcoming of her. Then they shamed anyone who were skeptical of this. Fucking idiots.
      It would be the safest bet ever that if it was Steve Shives suddenly making a video about how he is “red pilled” nobody would buy it. But since it’s a vagina at hand, it’s different. sigh.
      Well. whatever. If they want to be simps for a chick, let them be. I’ll be enjoying the inevitable shitshow that’s bound to come.

      1. The “skeptic” community is largely a bunch of neck beards and fedoras who just wanted to be the cool kids for a change.
        Do they shit on leftists? Sure.
        Do I think that they’re moral models or good templates for society?
        Hell no.

        1. Most of them are self-proclaimed anti-feminists but still spew bullshit like equality. They’re virtue-signalling pseudo-intellectuals, temporarily embarrassed leftists who have found a shtick they’re somewhat good at and have stuck with it ever since. Outside that they offer absolutely nothing worthwhile. The fact that they think that they are somehow contributing to change is amusing as hell. Glad I’ve stopped watching them, they’ve all become cancer.

        3. Thanks, I read a lot in English(which isn’t my native language). I’m not so good at the speaking English part, but one step at a time.

        4. Reading is what helped me when I was younger. It’s definitely the way to go.

      2. Hear, hear. She must be put to the sword and made to atone. None of this ‘As long as their apology is sincere we can forgive their transgressions.’ No. Fuck that. We want blood because before their epiphany, or, opportunistic cynicism, whatever suits, they did a lot of damage and spread wanton and malicious lies with nary a thought for the target.

        1. I’m quite certain they’ll come to regret it.
          Or maybe not, recently they have shown just how gullible they truly are.

        2. I wouldn’t rule anything out. They are like the serpent that even in its death throes will gnash around wildly, spraying venom and attempting to bite you.

  14. Overall, good article and solid points on the misconstrued use of all words listed. With this past election win for Trump, problematic, systemic, phobia, and privilege are being unpacked severely, considering none of them helped stave off the ‘apocalypse’ Trump winning was supposed to herald. If people applied themselves, they would discover they each have some sort of privilege and overall, America is insanely good since it allows most the privilege of knowledge and change not afforded in most other countries.
    I guess the ‘Left’ is trying their best to ruin Supremacy, but that word has been synonymous with prejudice even before white was placed in front of it. Still a stupid term, since like many other terms used, it thinly disguises the bias a person has and only masks whatever the real issue is with clever word play.

  15. While I agree that these words are losing meaning to the larger population, particularly because they’ve become so common we’re now emboldened to laugh at them, they still do have a rallying effect for the left (and the elite too, which will see them being outsized in importance).
    This is because when you pair these kinds of labels with a concept, critical thinking shuts down. Acceptance of the label and thinking within the label is all that matters. Confirmation bias takes over. Scott Adams wrote an important post about it a few months back, and I expanded on his thinking. The problem with the right has always been that their ability to engage in this word magic has thus far been lacking. http://masculineepic.com/index.php/2016/09/01/how-to-control-the-mind-of-almost-anyone-and-your-own/

    1. Your analysis is on target (as usual!), but I urge you not to shrug this stuff off as the left being the left. They now *control* the frame of dialogue in most spheres, and as Game practitioners know, frame control is everything.
      We need to break their frame at every turn, and (rhetorically) shove the shattered pieces down their throats and choke them with them.
      Remain reasonable. Stop being polite.

      1. Their control of the frame is weakening very quickly. We just need to keep moving ahead and upping our intensity.
        I have a few thoughts on this for a post.

        1. I for one would like you to share them and get that conversation happening. Their frame remains fully uncontested in the courts & law, and for me that is the apex of their power. All the media stuff is just rationale for what the left does to the rule of law.

        2. A post is coming about the Classics first. Then that.
          But actually they’re very, very mad about the Supreme Court right now. Thank God we won last year and got that seat. This was how you could tell the “never Trumpers” were deranged.

  16. 11. Gay. I remember when you could hang out on Grinder and point out how gay everyone and it just meant happy. And when I say Grinder, I actually mean planet earth before it kind of became grinder

      2. I look forward to the day when it is perfectly safe to name your son ‘gaylord’ on account of the world being sufficiently red-pilled and hetero. Your son’s son can be called gaylord junior too

        1. just checked, gaylord perry actually had a son he called gaylord junior. Good for him
          “Son Gaylord Jackson “Jack” Perry, Jr. died of leukemia in 2005″.
          Note he died of leukemia. Not aids. Probably

        3. there is both comedy and tragedy in that name. It would be tough being straight with that name, but even if you were gay, and you signed up to gaydar or something, the denizens there would assume you were a westboro baptist taking the piss or something. And if you ended up dying of aids, you really wouldn’t want that getting out now would you?

        2. Hahaha…they got Knucksie Jrs nail file!
          Baseball was so much more fun back then. Remember the Pine Tar game?

        3. wee bit before my time, but Ive seen it a million times…george brett was gonna kill billy martin…his eyes were CRAZY as he charged outta that digout

        4. They had some great fights too.
          Lou Piniella v. Carlton Fisk
          Graig Nettles v. George Brett
          Billy Martin v. Just About Everybody

        6. I remember her. She looked a little like Mildred “Boom Boom” Turner…

        7. Ill see if those fights are online-thanks. A crazy one was George Bell(BlueJays) drop kicking the pitcher in the balls

        8. Most of them are.
          The Piniella Fisk one was great.
          Nettles nails Bill Lee good.

  17. Transmission, transistor, transformer, transatlantic. 20 years ago when you said my trans it was my car trans, not a faggot.

  20. Shaun King is a white guy that identifies as black because he grew up poor and his dad left him & his mom when he was young.
    Now think for a second how racist that actually is LOL

    2. I thought he is a light skinned Mulatto like Jason Kidd, but if what you say is true, then he basically a male version of that Rachael Dolezal freak.

      2. Thought the same. Knew a few black guys with the same skin complexion so until I get more than hearsay, I have no reason to believe it. He is typically too wordy and race baity for my taste anyway.

        2. That is pretty pathetic. Why hate the existence that gave you life? Never understood that logic.

      3. This basically shows how retarded the Black Lives Matter movement is…..black people have crowned a white guy pretending to be black as their leader

  21. I’m not scared of homosexuals. I resent them. Why should I be scared of faggots?
    Scared of thunder, height, fire, or drowning are make sense. Scared of faggots? Gimme a break.

    1. Would you want a blood donation from one?
      That’s when to be scared of ’em.

      1. I don’t wanna get blood donation from dogs, doesn’t mean I’m dog-phobia.
        And as far as I know, gay people aren’t allowed to donate.

  22. “Duh-versity” or is it “die-versity”?
    No, you cannot find an honest leftist. I’ve yet to meet one that is planning to move to a ghetto minority neighborhood with a failing public school system. Not one libtard will ever move to a predominantly failing city run by people of color much less any African country so they can wallow in all that ‘diversity’ crap. Maybe they will go to SE Asia at most, but we all know that should not count.
    No leftist will post a ‘This is a Gun Free Home’ on their door or front lawn. No lefist will pay a fair amount of taxes or pay more.
    It will be a glorious day when these bastards can be physically removed from society.

    1. You’d be surprised. I’ve known of leftists who are cucked enough to do exactly that.
      Then they complain when the locals accuse them of gentrifying the ‘hood.
      I haven’t seen any “gun free zone” signs in front of private homes… Yet.

  23. Gay. There’s nothing bright and cheerful about coprophagia and AIDS.

  24. They ruin everything they touch or talk about. Can’t wait for this pestilence of an ideology to be wiped off the face of the planet forever.

      1. Huuuum…….
        What does Almighty God usually do when he is sorely provoked?

    2. What no knee pads? Ouch that’s gonna chafe…….
      Maybe he’s trying to fit the mini van, flags and all, right up his ass!

        1. wow, I’m just like swimming in a sea of love right now. Care for a big gay skinny dip of togetherness? Boundaries are wrong

        7. there’s a special friend option. It’s automatic when you give them a thumbs up. Or fist.

        8. Careful around those black hawks. They make up only 10% of the helicopter population but are responsible for 50% of helicopter on helicopter violence.

  27. The left has a problem with Hitlerizing people they don’t like because just about everyone who remembers Hitler during his life has died by now. The name doesn’t have the emotional effect in younger people that it exerted over their grandparents and great-grandparents.
    Also the left has worked at cross purposes by spreading nihilism, cynicism and demoralization in the white population. If nothing in life matters, then the Holocaust doesn’t matter, either.

    2. It’s blown up in their faces spectacularly. By declaring everything up to and including a contrarian thought, ‘Hitler’ or ‘Nazi’ they have completely devalued whatever they allegedly did and trivialised it to the point where it is greeted with a yawn.
      And with that, when I am called ‘Hitler’ or similar I smile and correct them saying I am the monster hybridisation of a Super Hitler with Godzilla and King Kong that has Kratom injected into me intravenously through my testicles and who otherwise is 12′ 7″, breathes fire and flattens preschools for fun or due to boredom.

  31. Refugee.
    It used to mean prisoners of war. Now its a bunch of male pussies leaving behind their women and children to spoil the healthier ponds built by smarter people.

  32. …….. Forgot an important one. “Equality.” Which, as we all know means supremacy for women and minorities – well, actually anyone that isn’t a white, heterosexual Christian male.

  35. Reading that Privilege Bingo card reminds me I’ve got a few things going for me (I got cis white first-world adult with no criminal record Bingo!).

  36. Fuck-on that Privilege Bingo card I fill every space except ‘tall’ as I’m 5’10 and ‘support mainstream party’ because I am a hardened conservative and none fulfil that where I am in any way, shape or form. I’m very much pro Pinochet, pro Franco and pro Greek Junta as far as ‘political allegiances’ are concerned-that is to say, very nationalistic and libertarian in terms of rights and a believer of free market capitalism but with the need for a very rigid order and structure in terms of keeping society in check.

  37. #9 is particularly true for me. I remember in my university chem course, everytime the professor would discuss cis/trans isomers, I immediately imagined a trans molecule telling a cis molecule to check his privilege.
    Damn leftists.

  39. OT, but very relevant to ROK discussion, so now CNN threatened to dox someone who created a pro-Trump/anti-CNN meme (wrestling GIF), that the President promoted on Twitter.
    “CNN is not publishing “HanA**holeSolo’s” name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again. In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same.
    CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change.”
    http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/04/politics/kfile-reddit-user-trump-tweet/index.html

    1. Fucking scumbags.
      A billion dollar ‘news’ agency threatening a private citizen is not reporting news let alone allowing for freedom of expression.
      They’re scum. And they’re in the death throes, lashing around wildly in hopes they can take as many as they can down with them.
      How I wish I could be the one to land the killing blow and hammer the nails into their rancid carcass.

      1. Maybe this will help bring them down. It’s obviously only a ridiculous, harmless GIF.
        I often wonder how circumspect I should be on the web about revealing details of my life. Slowly you narrow down who you are. My thoughts are that the NSA knows everything anyway. But here’s a reason to be cautious, so a news agency can’t figure out your identity.

        1. This is true. You only give away however much you think you can stand to lose.

  40. ‘And this is only scratching the surface…’
    Indeed.
    Here’s a thought, approximately 20 years ago I was playing a game called ‘PC Bingo’ with my girlfriend. I invented the game. We created a bingo grid and each ‘number’ was a form of debased pc language.
    So, you would ‘score’ by using the pc phrase.
    ie ‘We are reaching out to disadvantaged youth’ would score three points. Or, ‘Stake holders will assess the claimants needs’ would score two.
    Point being this political debasement of language & meaning is unstoppable.
    It is driven by women and they do not have the political conceptualisation required to understand how dangerous it all is.
    We lost this battle.
    Public language is now enemy territory.
    …..another thing Eric Blair got right.

  41. Along with every leftist target being labeled as Hitler, comes a dangerous idea: ‘If only he had been killed in the early days, then WWII, the Holocaust, etc. would have been avoided.’ Of course we see this threat of pre-emptive violence against Trump and followers all the time nowadays.

  42. “Triggered” is a big overused leftist buzzword, with it’s earlier meaning lost now.
    If some burly minority attacks you, it’s your fault because you triggered them with your micro-aggressions, you cis-gender, privileged scum.

  44. Feminist comes immediately to mind.
    Also, perverting the word “white” into a slur.

  46. Liberal is the one they killed first. There is nothing liberal about modern so-called liberals. I enjoy telling confused Canadians that the only actual Liberal party in Canada is … the CPC. Ha.

  48. “Conversation” is by far the most overused, meaningless weasel word in use today. It’s use has also infected the corporate world when one wants to spew BS instead of using precise language to solve problems.

  49. Aren’t we being a little dramatic here? These “snowflakes” who hardly qualify to be called liberal are just idiotic drones. In order to grant credence to that mass of hysterical beings, there must be some sort of basic respect. It was lost and probably will never be regained again. Whatever terminology they use or misuse is irrelevant.

  50. If Shaun King is as black as he thinks he is, I challenge him to use the “n” word in a crowd of actual black folks and see how that works out for him.

  51. You missed out “gay”; once one of the loveliest words in the English language, meaning happy and joyous. Now it refers to some of the most joyless, unhappy and intolerant people on the planet.

Comments are closed.