News

Editor Of Newspaper That Accused ROK Of Being Pro-Rape Has Resigned For Sexual Harassment

276 Comments

The editor-in-chief of Fairfax Media’s The Age, Mark Forbes, has resigned and apologized to a woman over a sexual harassment incident. This scandal comes only months after The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald falsely accused Return Of Kings and its proprietor of “promoting rape” and other forms of sexual assault. The Age, which covers Melbourne and the state of Victoria, is the sister Fairfax paper of The Sydney Morning Herald, which covers Sydney and the state of New South Wales. As a result, these publications significantly reproduce the same “stories,” including the various defamatory articles about the ROK meet-ups earlier this year.

screenshot-www-smh-com-au-2016-12-06-15-30-55

More shockingly still, The Herald Sun claims Fairfax knew about the allegations for two weeks, before eventually suspending Forbes only last week. Return Of Kings will be the first group of people to defend and actively campaign for due process, not hysteria, in determining sexual harassment or assault allegations. But Forbes’ admission of responsibility in recent days raises the specter of Fairfax potentially knowing the exact details of the incident and doing nothing about it for days.

And it gets worse. The Guardian reports that a second woman has come forward, claiming that Forbes made comments about her breasts at a function earlier in the year. Inasmuch as this second accusation should require actual proof to be taken seriously and shouldn’t be believed because of an initial admission about something else, Fairfax Media has brought this situation on itself. By constantly reiterating the fiction that rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment are regular experiences for Western women, male Fairfax employees can hardly complain when amorphous, seemingly opportunistic allegations are made against them.

Let’s remember that at the time of the alleged second incident, February 2016, Fairfax had already vilified Roosh and Return Of Kings, mostly for a satirical piece from the year before. It should have been keeping an eye on Mark Forbes, though, not denigrating an online website and obliquely attempting to incite violence against its owner and his family.

Ironically, it seems that Fairfax Media might have a “rape culture” dilemma, not Return Of Kings.

Hypocrisy much?

Stuart Washington’s Sydney Morning Herald journalists and Fairfax’s general journalism pool were given wide scope to publish all sorts of nonsense about Return Of Kings, but details of Mark Forbes’ sexual harassment are being kept to a bare minimum.

Fairfax Media went into great detail and to great lengths in January and February to maliciously portray Return Of Kings as a supposed lightning rod for “legal rape advocates.” Yet its accounts of the sexual misdeeds of its former Age editor-in-chief are decidedly sanitized. They do not mention, for example, that Forbes was alleged to have groped the buttocks of a female journalist, which is a lot more serious than the generic umbrella term of “sexual harassment.”

Compare this to the treatment Return Of Kings and Roosh received in early 2016. A satirical piece on personal responsibility, directly modeled on Jonathan Swift’s A Modest Proposal, was dissected hamfistedly by ideologically-driven Fairfax journalists and used to generate third-party threats of violence against men who only wanted to meet with other men for drinks. To add insult to injury, Fairfax publicly and effusively thanked Forbes for his thirty years of “service” after he admitted responsibility for the sexual harassment.

In large part, all the vitriol unleashed against Roosh and Return Of Kings in January and February started with columns penned by Fairfax journalists, such as the violence-inspiring Phoebe Moloney. Having read Moloney’s ridiculous piece, in which she underestimated the number of monthly ROK articles by nearly a hundred, a group of teenagers organized a Facebook event where participants would bring knives to a central Sydney Starbucks for the purpose of castrating ROK meet-up participants.

In light of this and other deplorable developments at this time, I wrote to Stuart Washington, managing editor of The Sydney Morning Herald, insisting that he correct numerous inaccuracies in Moloney’s piece in particular. In reply, he restated Fairfax’s unsupported allegations that we advocated “rape.” It is interesting to juxtapose Washington’s willingness to defend drivel written about us then with the apparent reticence of The Sydney Morning Herald now to have its reporters mention the exact nature of Forbes’ sexual harassment.

This is what happens when you churn out “listen and believe” articles about “sexual assault” all the time

Either former Age editor-in-chief Mark Forbes did indeed sexually harass the woman in question or he didn’t, but had to go anyway. I would not be surprised if the latter scenario is the true one. Resisting claims of sexual harassment in a workplace as notoriously leftist as Fairfax Media is often about as fruitful as having as a snow-shoveling business in central Australia. The Daily Life section of both The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald is the worst of all, combining incessant articles about “rape culture” with simultaneous attacks on women (regarding their fashion sense) and support for them (if they’re fat and feminist).

In writing articles that emphasize “listen and believe” and/or acquiescing to them, male Fairfax employees are paradoxically opening themselves up to a maelstrom of false accusations. I do not feel sorry for these men, or sympathize with any fear they might feel in crossing their female colleagues in a professional setting. My overriding concern, however, is for the general society negatively impacted upon by claptrap such as polemics about “rape culture.”

A retraction, let alone apology from Fairfax Media for how we were treated in early 2016 will not be forthcoming. All I can suggest is that Fairfax should be more focused on its own toxic workplace culture and the other Mark Forbeses it might be employing than the political and social non-violence that characterizes Return Of Kings.

Read More: How To Incite Human Beings To Violence Through False Headlines

276 thoughts on “Editor Of Newspaper That Accused ROK Of Being Pro-Rape Has Resigned For Sexual Harassment”

      1. Ha! In all seriousness, I think incidents like this convert men much quicker than anything else. Hell, I had a false rape accusation in college that got me kicked out of my house which led me to places like this. Luckily that was the worst of it.

  2. So Fairfax Media wanted to falsely accuse ROK readers of getting together to discuss “rape tactics” on meetup day right? Well Mark Forbes, you’ve been caught and YOU’RE NOT RAPING ANYONE TONIGHT! 😀

  4. Now imagine america under hillary. She promised half her cabinet would be women, it follows the other half would be male feminists. Same with her judge appointments. Slapping a woman on the butt would become attempted rape. Manosphere sites would be pulled down as hate speech.

    1. I’d be so ashamed of the country I would spell “America” always in lower case just like you did.

    2. last night at one of the most expensive and posh restaurants in New York, a place called Per Se, Forbes Magazine through its 30 under 30 party. There are 20 categories in which they highlight 30 people under the age of 30 who they see as making a significant impact and really going places. Naturally there was an outcry because the lists are dominated by white men. There are tons of articles “where are the women” but none that actually explain which women and why. They are just upset that there aren’t enough women with zero explanation.

  5. Rape culture is a crock of shit from beginning to end. Oh the shame of it! Harassed a poor delicate flower… Ought to be guillotined for that! Which injustices do you correct at a personal level and which do you need to evoke the intervention of a higher power, the police or employer? Then what is the potential harm, dismemberment, paralysis, organ failure, poisoning etc… by getting your butt pinched? Not quite the same as a baseball bat to the head or a knife into the flesh. Does it really require intervention from above? Judging by the photos, does not look like these white collar journalists are about to take life or injure anyone..

    1. depends on who swings the bat or wields the knife. Keep in mind, I do NOT agree with this way of thinking but this is how it works out.
      SJWs believe that power is the integral part of human relations and that privilege is the ultimate expression of this power. Things that come form places or peoples of less privileged must be prioritized over those that come from places of more privilege ( cf. slater’s war; saved by the bell college years where the privileged and typically white activity of skiing needs to be understood as necessarily inferior to the protest at the deans office to institute a chicano studies program).
      It is important to understand how the thinking works on these people. So “better” and “worse” are now defined in terms of privilege with less privilege = better. Further, “good” and “evil” are also defined this way with good=less privilege and evil = more privilege. So, for instance, this leads to their claim that black people cannot be racists because racism requires privilege so you can only be racist downwards on the privilege spectrum.
      So back to your point. You say “Not quite the same as a baseball bat to the head or a knife into the flesh.” but this is incorrect from their point of view. You don’t see it….which is actually a credit to you as a human being, but you really ought to understand these lunatics if you ever want to be able to argue with them.
      When you add the component of privilege this changes. So a white straight male hitting a black faggot in the head with a baseball bat is much worse than a straight black man grabbing the ass of a straight white woman. In fact, the black man grabbing the ass of the woman, to some, isn’t wrong at all because there is no privilege lost between the black man and the woman, though feminists will say that the black has male privilege and the woman has white privilege so it is MAYBE kind of bad but not terrible…though it would be worse if it was a Hispanic woman and worse yet if it was a Hispanic lesbian or transdoodle.
      That said, a heterosexual white male (especially one with more social or career leverage) grabbing the ass of any woman, a minority especially, is a far greater crime than a black male bashing a Louisville slugger over the head of a white male because there is a ton of privilege superiority that the white male has and the “wrongness” of the crime requires the existence of a privilege advantage.
      If you are like me, reading this probably made you just as angry as writing it makes me but hiding from the reality of the way they are thinking is not going to help.

      1. “a white straight male hitting a black faggot in the head with a baseball bat is much worse than a straight black man grabbing the ass of a straight white woman. In fact, the black man grabbing the ass of the woman, to some, isn’t wrong at all because there is no privilege lost between the black man and the woman, though feminists will say that the black has male privilege and the woman has white privilege so it is MAYBE kind of bad but not terrible…though it would be worse if it was a Hispanic woman and worse yet if it was a Hispanic lesbian or transdoodle.”
        it gets even more complex than that the moment you bring intersectionality into it.

        1. it does. I predicted this over a decade ago in a paper I wrote based on the above mentioned saved by the bell episode where I suggested that MLK and his concept of not judging by color of skin would be considered inherently racist and I knew this by extrapolating from a saved by the bell episode. I gave the same paper at three separate professional conferences and the reaction ranged between mocking me and calling me a dangerous racist because I said AC Slater would be replacing martin luther king for our race paradigm. Turns out I was right.
          The math gets incredibly complicated if you break everything down as much as possible but you can absolutely do a calculus where you can figure out for any given situation which is a worse crime or even which is not a crime at all.
          If I was better with computers and stuff I bet I could create an algorithm of variables which would allow a person to pick a certain number of details about the perpetrator, the victim and the crime to produce a 0 (not a crime)-10( worst type of crime) scale based on privilege and eve compensate for intersectionality.

        2. sounds like an interesting read. I used to watch that programme a lot but it’s a bit vague in my memory now – apart from the girl who went on to do that stripper film. Identity politics is reaching a crest right now – or at least it will either begin to collapse into its own absurdity or worst case scenario harden into some kind of genuine bizarro authoritarianism – where this kind of thinking gets reflected in law. Protected groups are in fact the first blast against the principle that we are all equal under the law. It needs to be undone before we get to the point where a murder could rate as a 0 while a pat on black disabled lesbians bottom could rate as a 10 in terms of seriousness.

        3. I would love to read your paper, but I understand why you wouldn’t want to dox yourself. I might read it and think it is utter nonsense, or maybe I would find it brilliant…I am not making any assumptions either way. I write here and there (on the side, I am not a writer by trade). One of the first things I realized when writing is that the average American is an IDIOT. It can be very frustrating, because often you have to dumb things down to make people understand. Either that, or just ignore the chumps, which isn’t easy, especially when they twist around the message you are trying to convey.

        4. “One of the first things I realized when writing is that the average American is an IDIOT”
          winning policy, just ask Hillary (until her phone gets disconnected…)

        5. this is exactly correct. Oddly enough, I honestly believe that if he can just not die of a massive heart attack in the next two years, the one who will finally be able to pull all of this stuff apart and make real sense of it, should he wish to, will be Zizek.
          I have been looking on external hard drives for that damn paper for a while. If I ever find it I will shoot it over to you. It is about 30 pages. Meanwhile, here is a brief description of the main point and, I can se by your understanding, you will get where the expansion eventually goes with regard to identity.
          Over the last 20 years our concept of racism has altered dramatically. The Martin Luther King / Bill Cosby idea of ending racism which was to see a person and not a race is now considered racist itself. Basically, the way things are seen now, to not see race is to deny the privileged position one is in and it is therefore racist to ignore that a black person is black rather than to acknowledge it and acknowledge the power differential based on privilege. While this seems like a relatively new idea it was predicted back in September of 1993 in Saved by The Bell: The College Years in the episode titled Slater’s War.
          In this episode Zack is trying to take Leslie away on a ski trip. However, Leslie is suspicious of Zack’s motives and tells him she will only goes if he finds another couple. Zach enlists slater who is going to bring some girl and all is going well until Slater meets Amy who is part of a group of “Chicanos” protesting the underrepresentation of Chicano history and demanding a Chicano studies department in the university of California. Slater finds out that his father changed his named from Sanchez to Slater to get into the army and apparently he wasn’t actually Italian but also a Chicano. Amy guilts slater in to joining the protest to create a Chicano studies department and helps him learn Spanish. As Slater gets more in touch with his Chicano roots (eating burritos, working as a bus boy, being hyper sensitive towards perceived racism — not even kidding here) he finds out that the protest is going to interfere with the Zack’s ski trip. Slater cancels the ski trip and Zach tells him, in one of the best lines ever on television, that he “picked the wrong weekend to be a Chicano.” It is here that we see the dialectic of race that is only now finding its way into the popular mind set.
          See this marks the moment of the official shift from “all races are equal” (which is a very Cosby Show kind of view and is traumatically equivalent to having someone drug your pudding and rape you now) to the point where all non-white things are, simply by virtue of being non-privileged, intrinsically valuable. Whitey is racist if the privilege or the inherent value of the non-privileged isn’t emphasized. This is all symbolized very nicely by Zack’s wanting Slater to go skiing, which is pretty archetypal as far as privileged white activities go – rich white people sliding around on big mountains of whiteness with only non-white things to stand on and push themselves along with. At the end Zack learns his lesson and becomes racially sensitive by acknowledging that he is privileged and denying himself his privileged activity in favor of the ridiculous activity of a sit-in by 15 Chicanos in the dean’s office demanding a Chicano Studies Department (and presumably taco day in the cafeteria). He acknowledges that the minority activity is more valuable simply by virtue of it being non-privileged.
          Oddly enough, Zack breaks the fourth wall with the recall to the original saved by the bell and wonders what happened to Slater being Italian (you know he was Italian because he put his finger in some tomato sauce and said “now that’s Italian” as opposed to now when he is more suited to judging burritos and working as a bus boy)

        8. I got a lot of upvotes the other day when I made a comment to the effect of “think about the people you know. think of one that is average in that group and realize they are smarter than about 50% of the people in the world. lol. There is a brief synopsis of the paper below.

        9. That isn’t a policy…it is the truth. You don’t even know what the definition of policy is, which kind of is proving my point right there. Most people aren’t well-read, and even if they make an effort to educate themselves, they tend gravitate toward whatever aligns with their pron conceived ideas.

        10. Well, call it a ‘pron conceived idea’ if you must but when I find someone declaring half the population to be idiots, they are in fact simply proclaiming that they are smarter than most. Usually makes me think the opposite.
          My crooked reference was just an example of the folly of thinking that you’re smarter than everybody, a folly which cost the dems the election. All in the service of the bit. Not my best work.

        11. Truly, I think idiots make up maybe 20% of the population. Even average and below average types, within a certain margin, are perfectly capable of acting fine in day to day dealings and generally do well at one or two things and otherwise just want to get on with life. That they may not be able to pinpoint the location of Micronesia on the map means exactly jack shit. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that outside of having to deal with Micronesia in your day to day life, or having some other immediate need that requires you to know where Micronesia is, that this is an invalid test of intelligence.
          I bring up Micronesia because this is the typical “I’m smarter than you plebes” thing that those who think themselves the upper caste of the intelligentsia use as a litmus test. We see it every election cycle when they throw out foreign policy questions about obscure places to GOP candidates and then sneer if the politician in question is not intimately knowledgeable about the state of milk production in eastern Latvia. Basically it’s all bullshit and bluster to make them feel smart, when in fact, they probably aren’t.

        12. Huh, that sounds like an interesting read. It’s probably not what the writers of Saved by the Bell intended, at least to the extent of your in-depth analysis.

        13. I make no claim as to what the writers of saved by the bell intend or do not intend. My specific area of study was something called Hermeneutics which, in a nut shell, was the study of interpretation and message. The idea being that everything that exists, from art to pop culture to DMV manuals to bibles all are equally important and can be researched and used as exegetical material for a broader insight into the world

        14. I am no genius, I am above average intelligence, but there are plenty of people who can blow me out of the water when it comes to intellect. However, I make the effort to read both sides extensively before drawing my own conclusions. If there is an idea or belief that goes completely against my way of thinking or values, I don’t automatically say that I am right and you or wrong, so STFU. The average American doesn’t bother.

        15. Oh, I wasn’t saying you were. What you said above, I totally agree with. Even some great writers have acknowledged that readers have interpreted their writings in ways they have not intended.

        17. We all know the Russians are stealing all the milk in eastern Latvia.
          Porzingis will change that.

        19. Just look at the election, for example. How many people voted for Trump just because they see him as the ultimate alpha male, or voted for Hillary because she has a vagina?

        21. First off: f’n brilliant analysis.
          Secondly: “As Slater gets more in touch with his Chicano roots (eating burritos, working as a bus boy, being hyper sensitive towards perceived racism — not even kidding here)….” I find it amazing how often SJWs explaining just how racist everyone else is tend to expose their own innate racism.

        23. White privilege definitely exists, but no one should have to apologize for being white (or any other race for that matter).

        24. Just so you know, I don’t pull obscure acts out of my ass to “prove” I am smarter than anyone else. When say that the average person is an idiot, I say that it is because they are uniformed or ill-formed.

        25. i’d like to read it if you happen upon it, but I think I’ve got the jist. Actually I just checked on youtube and there’s two version available – one which is pay per view, about 2 dollars and only available to privileged (white) americans (or someone with a vpn) and another which features the whole episode but is almost unwatchable as it is filmed in some kind of bizarro framed double-vision https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Filk_x1WhE8 In fact I’d it’s probably been uploaded by the very same elite wasp establishment trying to sell the paid version.
          I haven’t read enough Zizek to know whether he’s capable of delivering us from identity / privilege politics. I’ve seen a perverts guide to cinema and read a few things he’s written on cinema & lacan etc – and when I say a few I mean pages not books. I think he writes very well, and is the real deal (as post-modernists go) but I flag after a few pages, and if he ever dies of a heart-attack it will probably involve an endless erudite but witty narrative on the heart-attack as signifier or something
          Re. Saved by the Bell you could be right, about it reflecting a critical moment in the egalitarian anti-racist zeitgeist. We’re probably both old enough to be far more comfortable with the King / Cosby viewpoint. As someone who was educated at around about the time that episode aired I’d say I was probably a bit behind the radical (student) view that was taking form at that time – I was well aware of marxism, anarchism and lefty politics generally, but somehow I didn’t see the whole identity politics things coming – I was aware of radical feminism but not the post-modern variety, let alone queer politics and the whole lgbt thing (which was developing in earnest behind the scenes) and student race politics in the UK was arguably more limited to the less traditional universities – what were then polytechnics + a few that put on courses in cultural studies and the like
          I do think identity politics poison has a lot to do with the reinvigoration of marxism though. Just as people like Foucault were taking marxists to task for having too simplistic a notion of power as something evil and offering us alternative ways of looking at its ‘cirulation’ along came people like Stephen Lukes with new ways of understanding power in terms of domination in fairly subtle and even invisible ways. It’s at this same time – mainly 80s to early 90s I’d say – that you get feminists trying to reframe male oppression of women into something equivalent to class struggle, at the same time as in cultural studies, and oriental studies and sub-altern studies (and other shit forms of studies) were trying to do the same for race and religion.
          This is arguably why we now have Trump, a resurgence of populism and nationalism, and growth of the idea that people need to divide into quasi armed camps – all of them to be seen as oppressors against the oppressed. It’s no co-incidence that the resurgence of white nationalism / pride or whatever happens at this point, after every group has been re-described in terms of its position within the marxist power nexus, but also after re-configuration has got to the point where virtually its every expression – as in BLM, intersectionality, LGBTQ / tranny ‘choose your own gender’ etc – seems to be self-satirising itself in its own ridiculous militancy. We live in dangerous times today precisely because these idiots take their cue from the scummy little power and identity politics of those 80s and 90s radicals, and the truly terrifying thing is that given that most of them were marxists or quasi-marxists committed to class struggle and pretty much violent revolution, they are probably glad right now that all of that is happening. The revolution doesn’t occur without revolutionary violence. It truly is a tragedy in many ways.

        27. Zizek’s heart attack will come because despite doing roughly 18 metric tons of cocaine per day he still weighs like 300 pounds. He is at a point where he is starting to deconstruct deconstruction. The post modern people wanted to replace one structure with another despite their claims of structure and binary destruction. What they have done is woven a web of nothingness that winds up becoming, in a Foucault approved sense, something. The simulation has, as it always does, become the reality…..and simulacra and simulation are woven tightly enough that is has reformed its own structure and dialectic. As a pure fucking madman genius asshole, Zizek seem to be blowing a hole in the new simulation as the replacement of an old simulation and showing how inauthentic the theorists were in the first place.
          There is going to be some interesting cutting edge stuff going on in the next few years but I have my money on zizek accidently bringing down the whole damn jenga board that propped him up in the first place and laughing like a loon as he creates a massive vaccum

        28. “Zizek’s heart attack will come because despite doing roughly 18 metric tons of cocaine per day he still weighs like 300 pounds”
          I guess that alone would make him philosophy’s High Septum ..(game of thrones ref.)
          He writes so bloody much I don’t really care to tackle his stuff, but on the occasions I have engaged with him, I’ve always found him to have a substance pretty much missing from most post-modern writers. I’m not sure I could sum up his project though, so I’ll be interested to know if he discovers the higgs-bosun or whatever it is you think he’s about to achieve. From the way you describe it it may actually be an interesting test of much 20th thought. My impression for what its worth is that Zizek though a lefty has a playful integrity about him. A lot of the most serious criticism levelled against the post-moderns and the ‘cultural marxists’ etc – is that their project was primarily destructive. That could be no more than to say that ‘critique’ is something that necessarily withers its object, but when you combine that with the political history of the 20th century that’s not a minor criticism. If you are attacking something to replace it with something better and improved it might seem to have a better claim to justice than if the medusa like gaze in question simply turns the object to stone. If Zizek is doing what you think he is it will be interesting to see if his gaze ossifies its object in like manner. Re. his legacy I’m not sure its the done thing to get any kind of closure with thinkers like Zizek

        30. its not priviege, our dna was formed through hardships of enduring cold and difficult climates. we had to be innovative and build trust with our tribesman. again, this is now part and parcel within our DNA. facts don’t equate to privilege.

        31. Then what you should say is that the average American is ignorant rather than an idiot. Now I say this only as a grammar Nazi. I truly believe that the average American is an idiot, that is that they are incapable of processing information into knowledge.

        33. I voted for him because he is not a Republican (despite his being the official candidate of that party).

        34. I still prefer the word “idiot”, as it includes those who who are truly half-wits, and those who choose to be willfully ignorant.

        36. Lesser of two evils who aren’t continually bringing up new gun control measures.

      2. This is why I don’t entertain their world of idiotic sophistries and word games. They can rationalize the hell out of anything in order to make it “correct and good”, even if it mean twisting reality to the point that up is down and black is white. Screw their word games. I understand how they work and the mechanics you describe, I simply give them no credence in a discussion and dismiss them summarily with a “Your worldview has no bearing on this discussion” and a middle finger.

        2. that is an appropriate response for sure…..but I think a lot of guys out there don’t understand how this stuff works. It isn’t because they are dumb…far from it. Most the guys who don’t get this simply can’t fathom something this maddingly fucking stupid.
          Because of this when some somali rapes the fuck out of a Scandinavian and feminists are like “shit happens” but then a girl gets complimented on the tits she has dangling out and feminists cry “rape” a lot of guys are just plain confused.
          I think it is important to understand their insane logic here. It is woven very neatly, but like headphone wires it can, with patience and understanding, be unwoven and that patience and understanding begins in knowledge. If you just get frustrated and start pulling at the thing the knot just gets worse.

        3. as a side note, have you ever seen someone making one of these shoe horned justifications and calmly said “so what you are saying……” and then carefully laid the logic out for them just to watch them realize how fucking stupid they sound. A lot of people, I truly believe, are good people who have had their minds twisted and enough careful explanation of just what the fuck is going on will actually help them see how absurd it is and on a personal level be of real help. Of course, some are too far gone…but then there is always the middle finger solution.

        4. Its charitable to try to straighten them out, once. But like you say, too many are resistant to self-examination because it runs afoul of the GroupThink of their personal FashionClique.
          “you can lead a gift horse to water but you cant look in his mouth”
          -A. Bunker.

        5. I’ve found for a long time that if you put this movement’s beliefs into the same context as the beliefs of medieval church goers and leaders, it all rather matches, tile for tile, except for the actual topic matter. The higher ups do all of the mental gymnastics required to lay out the logic (dogma) and then present it to the laymen of the movement/religion, who then sally forth and declare who and who isn’t a heretic, with all accompanying finger pointing and witch burning (but only if she weighs less than a duck). Everything you outlined could easily be ascribed to medieval clerics is what I’m saying. That we deal with the laymen of the movement daily and can defeat their “logic” by laying it bare to them, as you suggest, fits perfectly with the notion that they’re decent people and not stupid, they’ve simply bought into the entire dogmatic justification for their beliefs.

        7. The only time I will ever both doing this is when it in some way serves my advantage or is funny to me. I would never do it out of goodness or desire to help. Because, in response to Archie, in the words of the inimitable Dorothy Parker, you can lead a horticulture, but you can’t make her think

        8. I see a lot of the same controlling mechanisms from ancient times in many of the idiotic political schemes of today, to be frank. Take environmentalism. This is ancient shamanism to it’s core. A group of witch doctors tell you that if you don’t give ample sacrifice to the gods (which they will, of course, be happy to convey along to the gods on your behalf) then the rains won’t come, crops will be destroyed, fires will burn in the forests and the oceans will dry up. But…just hand over that fatted calf that you’d been planning to feed the family with this winter, and why by golly, the gods will not destroy the earth with weather events! I mean they don’t even deviate an iota from the original script as far as framework and assumptions. That the shamans have a priest caste now (“scientists!”), as then, is no surprise either.

        10. I was trying to frame it in reference to Full House but couldn’t quite pull it off as well as I’d hoped.

        11. I would have also accepted any of the superhero (though doing it in terms of Supes, Green Lantern or the Flash would be preferable)

        12. I know nothing of “superheroes” or comic books.
          The only sci fi thing i evere really liked was the predator.
          When i die, i want to come back as a predator.

        14. According to most feminists I am already to be considered a predator

        15. No, Zach is Uncle Danny. Slater is Uncle Jessie. Screech is Uncle Joey. I think that’s pretty obvious.

        16. I picked that show for camp value and because the Olson twins have an off/on – hot/eww thing going on that I find oddly entertaining to watch as they grow older. But I never actually really watched even one episode of the show. I think it was on once on a television that I was sitting in a room with, that was not my room, but I couldn’t stand to watch the screen for more than 10 seconds at a time without fear of projectile vomiting raising its ugly head.

        18. The creepy thing is all the girls who watched that show now want to bang saget because he cusses a lot in jos stand up.
          Daddy issues abound.

        19. How so i turn myself into a super strong technologically advanced alien hunter?
          Im still trying to figure it out.

        21. Easy silencer on rape culture.
          Woman: We are surrounded by rapists and all men are rapists. I was raped. Men need to stop raping.
          Men: There is no rape culture.
          Woman: Yes there is and you support it.
          Man: I do?
          Woman: Yea, you do. Pig.
          Man: Yet you felt safe enough to share your news of being an easy target, in front of me, another potential rapists, why?
          Woman: Listen I have mace.
          Men: Good. Make sure to sleep with it every night while worrying about all men. Your spouse. Your partner’s friend. The reporter you wish to share your rape with. The cop you want to report your rape too. In fact you would likely be safest in the wild protected by bears as they are lovely. Like Winnie the Pooh. Make sure to coat yourself in honey so the bears know you’re friendly. Cheers.

        22. The college I went to for my undergrad required us to live in dorms for the first 2 years of enrollment. The dorms were pretty bad, and they had this weird cable package that consisted of only about 10 local channels from different cities nearby. So it wasn’t the big 3 or 4 stations with a variety of different channels (ESPN, MTV, etc.), it was just different feeds, like 2 ABCs, 3 CBSs, 2 Foxes, 1 NBC, 1 TBS.
          Somehow, this led to Saved by the Bell being on literally (Hitler) all day. Some stations would play it in the morning, some at lunch, some in the afternoon, some in the evening. Several played it twice a day as part of their programming, and a couple would play it in a two-episode block. Some played the latest episodes, some were a day or two behind, some were playing reruns from past seasons.
          The result of all of this was that literally (Hitler) everyone on campus spent some part of their day watching Saved by the Bell, whether they wanted to or not. It was a campus cultural phenomenon. We discussed it everyday as some kind of weird ritual. If you met someone new on campus, you could always start a conversation about SbtB, and how much we all hated it. People searching for things to do papers, experiments or speeches on would often use some episode of SbtB. One of the sociology professors was well-known for using the SbtB characters as his examples for every discussion.
          As a result, I left that school with a completely worthless degree and Stage 5 autism. I was “college educated” and functionally retarded. Then one day, I found the Red Pill…

        27. LOL “stage 5 autism”- I think I grew up in the same era as you. Still cant believe Screech became a prono star…

        30. Again, not top notch stuff, but still, in a bar on a Friday night and those two in the pic walk up and say “Want to live out a twins fantasy?” I’d say “Sure, let’s go”.

        31. You’d get explosive diarrhea if you saw what the girls look now. Zack and Slater have aged rather well.

        32. Well, sure, of course. I think they’re appeal is (a) they are on TV, so your brain thinks they are more attractive than they are, and (b) they are twins, which makes your dick think they are more attractive than they are.
          I’ve also noticed a strange thing about encountering TV people in real life: they are usually way less attractive in person. Usually they are short, thin and have disproportionately large heads. True story.

        33. Never dated a TV personality but I can say that the same is true for models. They look great in those photos and magazines. In real life they are built like a wire hanger, and have the same personality as a wire hanger. Once dated a beauty queen, for about 3 hours. When I couldn’t stand her vapid and vacuous conversation any longer I dumped her for a slightly less beautiful girl that actually was a thinking human being. She went ballistic, but I could not have cared less. Over the course of my life I usually tried to stick out the entire date no matter how bad, as a matter of honoring my committments. This was one of the few exceptions.

        34. haha i was ready for an epic conclusion.
          Kinda reminds of this one time Screech went up to Lisa Turtle..

        35. You give her too much credit, assuming rational thought is useful.
          Here’s one I use on my mom and sisters:
          American women have more money and rights than any women in any place in the world, or any time in history… yet 70% of divorces in this country are filed by women.
          Proving women are actually less happy when they get what they want.

        36. we can blow their minds with logic, but eventually they run back to the herd and exchange soundbites with eachother. “They’re all rapists, racists, sexists, misogynists, fascists, right?” “Yeah!”
          Happened to me on thanksgiving. I was asked to leave by the host when I made too much sense!

        37. Yeah, which is why it’s really only useful for lulz or self gain

        39. Like I said about a week ago, at they age, anyone is good looking unless they are fat or have a deformity.

        40. The self proclaimed smart leftists are fun to put in logic traps. It’s fun to watch them squirm and rationalize and trip over their own belief system’s fundamental hypocrisies.

        41. Yes, most everything we deal with today are ancient systems improved and repackaged. “Climate change” is actually the oldest known ruling class scam of exploiting fears of the weather.
          Joe Rogan Podcast 877. Ideology exists so people don’t have to invest the cognitive effort to understand things. The guest is a professor has been fighting the SJW’s.

        42. This is why I keep saying that thousands of years go buy and nothing actually changes. Humanity stays stuck in the same stupid games. I think my next life will need to be on my home planet, because I don’t think I belong here.

        43. “Don’t let the fact I got train raped by a bunch of third world invaders make you hate them. My pussy got tore the fuck up, and I say don’t question these mostly kind culture rich added diversity misunderstood saints. If I can take a triple double you should to. I would rather be an enlightened empowered progressive then some savage conservative. Thank you facebook for not deleting my post.”
          Sometimes the shit is so unreal I have to quad check to make sure The Onion didn’t pull a fast one. Nope, liberals killed parody. The look on my wife’s face when I read her the original. These people’s minds are gone, ass and pussy soon to follow.

        45. From transcending the world of man to saved by the bell porn…oh god…oh god……the theme song is in my head…….oh fuck, now I’ve infected the tribe nooooooooooo

        48. I’m not so sure that just telling men to go with their gut won’t fix this. Part of the problem here in my opinion is men trying to understand this so they sit and listen to an explanation. The explanation is easy. If it sounds like bullshit, it probably is. If it looks illogical, it probably is. And it’s probably all a play at getting more power (or something else of value).

        49. I was a priest in training and an apprentice priest (read scientist so their is no confusion for other readers) for a while. The problem was it was hard to get pussy when you sat in a lab for 80 hours a week. Unless you wanted lab pussy. Then you had that to deal with later.

        50. True that. From time to time I lament how many hotties my hometown would have if they all didn’t eat so much corn on the cob and Ben&Jerry’s ice cream. Unfortunately, the obesity level in rural america is almost as bad as it is in urban area’s. I can’t tell you how many skinny hard working farm boys I know that date farm fatties from the next barn over because little princess didn’t have to do any of the hard work her brothers did and she also wasn’t required to learn to cook, clean, sow etc….
          Sow, she just sat on her fat ass all day watching MTV and the like.
          If it weren’t for their blabbering mouths, and the fact that cows are useful, it would be hard to tell the difference between the princess and the milk cow.

        51. You aren’t wrong Franken and I am not a warrior out to change things…but sometimes when you hear something and you say “what the fuck????” to yourself you might want to know what it is that you are seeing. That’s me. Some people do not care and will just stick with “go with their gut” and some people will let both sides try to explain. I don’t think any particular one is better or worse, but I thought that if anyone was like me and wonders where the fuck it is coming from but they don’t really understand it I would lay out a very basic summation.

        52. I don’t know if there are any quick answers to keep your wife from getting fat. I work at keeping my SMV up, and flirt with her and the waitress. Although it ticks my wife off, It keeps her on her toes, and she does maintain herself. After six kids, she can still turn a few heads, although not as many as 15 years ago.

        53. Not a exact quote, but yeah it’s a real thing. Women that got gang banged was shilling for invaders on social networks in spite of her encounter of misunderstanding.

        54. I mostly agree with you. My one point of contention is when you say the new system is an “improved” version of the ancient ones. I think you are giving the new systems too much credit with that particular word. Perhaps I’m being a bit didactic though.

        56. I was mostly talking shit. Obviously, science has advanced tremendously since the dark ages or whatever; hence current policies (as ridiculous as some of them may be) are generally rooted in some sort of educated data.

        57. Yes, knowledge of how to manipulate and control people has increased, but the human race hasn’t changed. As a result those improvements simply decrease costs and increase revenues.

      3. This “privilege” stuff needs to be attacked directly.. When I was growing up in the 90s, never heard much about it, actually, having never lived in America, I’ve only heard the phrase “check your privilege” except through the manosphere and South Park. It is applied quietly though, with an unspoken rule about being light on offenders from unprivileged backgrounds, punishing white men hardest..

        1. The problem with attacking it is attacking the foot soldiers, while cathartic, doesn’t really do much of anything. They are just parroting what they are hearing from friends and professors and celebrities. The story of how it comes about is a very long one and you can’t just say “oh, ok, well this is stupid lets stop it” as it has been happening, in increments, for over 100 years. I think that it will eventually fall apart under its own weight and happen first at the academic level. There are certain total fucking lunatics in academia who see this. THey will write about it and in a few generations it is replaced by something else.

        2. Not that I interact with them, but when do all they get is ” did you come up with that all by yourself.” In the smugest most condescending pre kindergarten school teacher tone possible. Not gonna waste time on those that lack a single logical critical original thought.

        3. Do you mean like how that white kid in Stanford was convicted of forcible rape and given a few months in county jail; while several months later the same judge gave a Mexican guy a prison sentence for basically the same offense?

  9. If the woman did not report it to the police then it did not happen. All public rape allegations are false, real victims go to the police, not to the Media.
    However, the very peddlers of the so-called rape culture deserve anything bad happening to them which is the result of their anti-male activity.

    1. The blogger I mentioned earlier had an article on “foodie hipsters on food stamps” which was basically a huge and brilliant critique of modern education and it had one of the smartest titles I ever say
      Product Review: Panasonic PT AX200U

  12. The fact of the matter is that women should not be in the workforce. There are some positions, like receptionist, elementary teacher, whore, nurse, or stewardess that women do very well, but those positions should be limited to the single women.

    1. couldn’t agree more. Women in the work place has been disastrous for women and even worse for the work place

      1. Though their presence makes the office more pleasant, like new furniture or abundant sunlight.
        But let me clarify – I like to work NEAR women, not WITH them.

        1. I’m not encountering a lot of office environments these days that are not chock full of obese, bitter broads. I may be working in the wrong places, but I don’t recall this being the trend 15 years ago when, in fact, it was kind of fun to have the pretty girl in the office bobbing up and down on her toes in your office, twisting her hair and asking you a question while giggling. Haven’t seen that in forever.

        2. Its enjoying a bit of a renaissance in my tiny corner of the world. Either my bosses are a little -ahem- biased in their hires lately or else there are fewer problem-haired land-whales entering this field.

        3. I think it depends on the industry just as much as the location. Go into an advertising agency, a real estate brokerage house, pharma rep office, really any form of high end sales and you will find the smoke shows.

        4. Yeah, but that’s always been the case by necessity I think. I mean normal, non-public face/sales type offices. I recall working my first office job back in 1991, and I had beautiful women surrounding me. Just a normal insurance company place. The place I worked afterward also the same. Even worked on the floor of a large computer drive sharing operation back in its hey day and there were even pretty girls there.
          Now…eh…not seeing a lot of it any longer.

        5. The only way their presence makes the office more pleasant is their demanding better quality furniture and lighting and upper management spending the money on them.

        6. no experience there. I know here, other than that one exec woman, there are basically two types of broads. Assistants who are on the 6-8 level and old lady bookkeepers who have worked here processing either receivable or payable checks for 30+ years which are….well, nice old ladies

        7. like on Seinfeld when all the waitresses in the diner had huge tits.

        8. Almost!
          They fired the last of the landwhales because (shocker here) she wasn’t doing any work!
          Then there’s been a constant influx of fit, young, smiling girls. Some are even competent I hear.

        9. maybe the landwhale was like one of those Russian dolls and when you opened her lots of smaller chicks came out

        11. 15 years later, those pretty girls have gotten old and stopped bobbing up and down. The youngest woman in our office is around 50 and looks like she has a year membership at the Golden Corral. I don’t know where the younger girls are, probably working in the more menial positions that I did 15 years ago.

        13. yes, but they whine that more women are going to college then men and yet are getting paid less. I had about 50 civil engineering students in my college program, 3 were women. Meanwhile, you go to the art or anthropology classes, and 70% are women, and you would think most of the guys are women.

        15. A little off topic…last night, my wife was complaining about something, she asks “Why does it have to be so hard?”
          I got a shit eating grin and winked at her. That was enough.

        17. Nice to see the thrill isnt gone after 75 kids. Write an article on how you do it

        23. Hahaha….no way Jose and the pussy cats.
          As for feminists I am on record has wanting to bang a short haired dykey looking (in fat) feminist skank just because I want to add one to my collection but just the one time

        24. Which almost any half way honest woman will tell you right up front. I’ve heard this exact thing from no small amount of women in my life.

        25. Ok. But what color hair?
          Green?
          Blue? Purple? Or all in one?
          Do they need to have a multitude of “sciencey” tattoos?

        29. oh yeah….absolutely. I think of it like extreme fucking. Like those guys who have hunted enough deer and then go to Africa so they can shoot cooler bigger shit….

        31. Bigger? Sure.
          Cooler? Nope.
          Cooler would be some super sexy 18 yo brazilian who loves to cook.

        32. I have banged out my share of Brazilians and had one stay with me (22) for 2 weeks who loved to cook and did nothing but try to convince me to marry and impregnate her. She was about as close to what you guys would have called a unicorn as I have had the pleasure of defiling.

        33. Having experienced this let me tell you it is nothing like death. Death means your problems are over. Working for a woman means your troubles are just starting and will increase infinitely and forever.

        34. I was working in one place that had about 25% women. Most of us were engineers. We had a big meeting with upper management where we were encouraged to voice any complaints. As usual the men had none while the women spoke right up, and at length. One issue was that the women complained most bitterly that the rug and couch in the women’s bath room was getting shabby and the mirror needed to be bigger. All us men turned to each other and said, A rug and a couch?

        35. At my local grocery store they had a “manager” at an information desk in front of the cashiers rows. At one point I noted that there must have been a new store manager, because all the info desk managers were very well endowed young women. This went on a couple of years. I then noted that the store manager must have moved on because the quality of the info desk managers went way down.

        38. I can’t recall the source, but I saw an interesting post once. It showed a pictorial organizational chart for a small company. Every picture on the chart was of an attractive blond young woman, with big tits if the head and shoulders shot dipped low enough to show it. At the top were the three founders and top executives, all middle aged men.

        39. We now have frickin’ plastic plants, cutsey decorations and cumbersome desktop lighting because of the women. But on the other hand, we did get a water cooler.

        41. Now I don’t see whats wrong with that…In fact, when I was a yute I tried to get a job at the local Italian Bakery. The proprieter made it clear in no uncertain terms, accent and all, that I was no good because they ‘wanta pretty girl up front’

      2. I have been working here in an all guy office (engineering) for 5 years. Four months ago, we had a change in management and two women were hired. Never have we had the gossiping, backstabbing, or shirking of duties. Even some of the guys got into it. It is like some contagious disease.

        1. It really is insane. I am in a mostly male dominated business but our CFO is a woman and I shit you not, everything is about office politics with her…nothing about work any more. You can’t even imagine the shit this woman does, it is mind boggling. The owners have warned her to just ignore me but every single time there is any overlap in accounting and operations it always turns into a full blown war because I refuse to deal with her the way everyone else does — supplicating to please her so she just goes away.

        3. I’ve tried this. I can’t work with headphones. I got nice noise cancelling ones and everything, put them on my head and I was just too distracted.

        4. I knew where your comment was probably headed. It’s so predictable what type of influence they’ll often have on an otherwise good work environment.

        6. Their complaint that women don’t get paid as much is hilarious. If there were really an unfair dichotomy, don’t you think a business would take advantage of that by hiring only women?

        7. Yeah, I have thought about it. Not sure where I would want to go. At any rate, I have begun a project that will not be over for 2 more years and I am not the type to leave in the middle of something. So I figure I have 2 years to decide what is next.

        8. Well, if it helps sway you, consider this.
          OSU campus was attacked for the first and only time last week. This week, a protest erupted on campus where students were demanding the right to lawfully conceal carry as they attend class or walk about campus, if they are old enough to obtain a CHL. Other places have candlelight vigils and “We feel so sorry Poor Abdul felt so put out by our not sucking on Mohammed’s dick hard enough” gatherings, but here in Ohio we say “We need to carry more guns to put these scumbags down when they show up”. Heh.

        9. sounds lovely, but until cartographers discover that Ohio happens to be on the upper west side of manhattan it just isn’t a feasible location. for me.

        10. Hey now, as I recall, when you finally sell and scoot, you’re leaving NYC city entirely. I was speaking of that time. If you were talking about something else, then I clearly misunderstood.

        11. Yer pissing in the ocean…..
          Die hard New Yorkers know only New York and Florida for some reason….

        12. Nah, talk to him on the channel, I think he’s taking a gander at other places.

        13. that is true….but that is retirement time and there is no chance I would ever leave the coast. No, I am thinking in the next 2 years of finding different employment.

        16. I tried living in the city (not New York) before. It is not for me. I like to be able to piss in my back yard and leave my doors unlocked.

        17. There’s something to be said for being able to walk onto your back porch on a whim with your 30-30 and plink a few shots off just for fun, eh?

        19. I am not that isolated, there are cows and some neighbors 1/4 mile away. Some day maybe if I get my finances in order.

        21. not for everyone, that’s for sure. I try to explain to people that there is a small town mentality in NYC. I was born here and with some few exceptions for traveling and studying abroad have lived here all my life. I went to college here. I am as much of this city as the empire state building. Like most people who are from small towns and never leave, the world seems strange and uninviting outside my immediate periphery. The idea of not having a city that is in constant motion with constant background noise where I am surrounded by people (my neighborhood is 1.76 square miles with 226,000 residents) is odd to me. The concrete and the park and the high rises and the history and how to manage all makes sense to me here. Not so much elsewhere. When I retire I plan to leave NYC and move down to the Carolinas but until then I can’t imagine living somewhere else.
          That said, while I understand why people move here I have never in my life understood why people vacation here.

        22. I’m not that isolated today, but come next autumn, I will be. Finally moving out to the farmland I own out in the middle of nowhere Ohio. I can shoot at the horizon on the back porch of my future home and not even get the bullet off of my land. Can..not…wait.

        23. There are some aspects of the city that I do like, close facilities, able to hide in plain sight, meeting so many people, but like in our previous conversation, there are pros and cons. Those who get burned are the ones who do it half way (suburbia)

        25. Absolutely – suburbia, with all its promises of the “best of both worlds” actually delivers the worst of both.

        26. agreed. I never got suburbia. It is like all the bad parts of urban living but too far away from a city to be interesting. My eventual plans involve a small costal house on the outskirts of a seasonal vacation town in the inner banks of NC…..I see the appeal of rural areas. My family lives upstate in a rural area (apple farms) and I am really excited for Christmas and my annual trip up to the homestead and ancestral manse….but I too will be glad to get home.

        27. You know, funny thing about rural/city is that I really think it is tied up into married/single. I was talking to my cousin on one of my many scotch infused rants about how I am going to move up to the farm because I can have so much so cheap and just suck up the 2 hour commute each way and he didn’t try to talk me out of it wrt the commute like everyone else. He said: you realize you will need to get married. You can’t just go out and expect to meet a girl you have never seen before and who doesn’t know anyone who knows you, get them to fuck you for a few times and then just move on to the next one.
          I really understood…..my grandfather and his 4 brothers grew up in this small town and never moved out. They each had between 3-7 kids, most of which stayed and had kids of their own. I have to drive 30 miles to even hope to run into someone who isn’t either direct family or friends with direct family and probably another 20 miles to even have a shot at meeting people who don’t know anyone from my family.
          Likewise, I do not understand how a person can be married in the city. I have slept with 3 girls from my building now and have only run into one of them afterwards. The sheer amount of available poon makes it impossible to concentrate on a single person. The problem is that the cost of living is so high I think people move in with each other just to mitigate living expenses, wind up getting married and then having it end in disaster.

        28. Small town means to a large extent however that you know of the comings and goings of everybody nearly all the time, to the point of sometimes being smothering. I know all the folks who live near my land out in the country, and they keep watch over it and call me or my lessors if a suspicious car shows up or drives by too slowly. It’s a really, really different world than “impersonal/indifferent” which I get from the cities. I get what you’re saying otherwise though.

        29. “Likewise, I do not understand how a person can be married in the city”
          CONSTANT temptation, but delightful scenery at least!

        30. It is, and I like the small town bit….in small doses. Lord, I remember being in a bar raping to some girl and my cousin walked in and she said “oh let me go say hi to my cousin” and I was like god damn it! But when I get pulled over driving with a buzz on and the cop pulls me over and it is cousin Johnny and he calls me an asshole and tells me to drive carefully it comes in handy.
          I really like my Christmas time. The house has over 100 people in it coming and going and eating. Cousin Joe (who owns the only bar in town) comes by and plays Christmas carols on the trumpet, and everyone has a real blast. I am sure I will be sending pics on telegram. It really is nice. It just isn’t something I could live in……but I am glad it is there.

        31. I was born with my arm congenitally twisted. Serious birth defect.

        32. It is, and I like the small town bit….in small doses. Lord, I remember being in a bar raping to some girl and my cousin walked i

          Most small towns condone raping girls in bars, you know.

        33. Behind the bar, in the alley next door, in the park across the street — all fine. Just not actually in the bar.

        37. I don’t think that was a Freudian slip. I think that was the ironical use of ‘raping’, as in anything a man does to a woman is raping her. He was hitting on her = he was raping her.
          Or maybe the bar just had a pinball machine. You know what that always leads to…

        41. At my job all the local people are men except a secretary, I came from a job that was about 50/50 along with plenty of affirmative action hires, almost makes work fun.

        42. The General Assembly of Georgia passed a “College Carry Law” this past spring but the governor vetoed it…..I always knew there was something I didn’t like about that cat.

        43. There’s less than 9000 people in my WHOLE county. Small town down the road is home to a State Prison that has more inmates than the town has citizens. It gets loud around herebouts though in warm weather the damn frogs and crickets make so much racket they keep me up at night.

        44. Old lady that lives down the dirt road from me knows my coming and going because every time I go down the road she hears my truck and walks to the front door so she can see who it is.

        45. I’ve traveled a great deal and lived all over the US. Now I have returned to the state in which I was born. In parts the population density is measured in square miles per person. I like that much better.

  14. The virtue-signalling men proclaiming their Progressiveness from rooftops are the ones women should watch out for. It always seems like there’s a few skeletons in their closets.

    1. everyone has skeletons in their closet, especially if they can be manufactured by others

      1. I pretty much hang my skeletons out in public. I have them, but making a big deal about keeping them secret gives them more power over me (and potentially others having power over me) than they deserve. It is just an extension of the agree and amplify shit test response strategy.

  15. apparently nancy pelosi was on the phone to trump and tried to talk to him about ‘women’s issues’ so he just handed the phone to Ivanka.
    They had a good chat about periods or something I imagine

  16. I’d like to see an article on all the progressive manginas who’ve been hoist by their own petards the moment their kind turned on them, and sacrificed them to moloch for some minor discretion or misplaced word or for that matter virtue signalling hypocritical male feminists who turned out to be actual misogynist rapey scum despite their super PC politics. There is so many of them but i can’t think of their names mostly: Jan Ghomeshi, that PC academic, even Lawrence Summers: eventually progressives always eat their own. Male feminists should be made to watch a film of a large female constrictor eating the male snake she just mated with: because that is what will happen to them given enough time

    1. (Nelson thinks of an appropriate punishment following Mark Forbes’ sexual harassment case and Return of Kings “rape” defamation). Just HARDER.

  19. This is proof that God has a sense of humor, and that sense of humor revolves heavily around irony.

        1. all she needed to do was meet the girls from Clueless and they would have done her up just right.

        2. I dug the goth chicks. I was always willing to help them with their vitamin d deficiency

        3. The young and in her prime Alicia Silverstone. Mmmmmmmm…now thems good eats!

      2. So did I actually. What bugged me about her is that her name sounded like some strange disease you’d contract from sand fleas in Iraq.
        “Damn dude, you’re breaking out all over, looks like you got a bad case of ally sheedy going on! Better get to a doctor man!”

        1. we allllllll dug molly dude. That’s like saying “i really liked the song satisfaction”

  23. The difference between sexual harassment and non-harassment? Whether or not the woman wants to fuck you.
    Faggots like him helped put rules like this in place and now he’s being burned by them.

    1. He made the mistake of thinking that white knighting would make women want to fuck him, when it turns out, the opposite is true.

      2. He had probably just written another hit piece on masculinity, so he felt a little frisky, drank a couple glasses of wine, and squeezed that girl’s ass. Little did he know that had he written a piece for ROK instead, she may have not only been receptive, but would have blown him in the bathroom.

    2. woomp there it is.
      Gotta be aggressive. If it doesnt pan out stop giving her attention. She’d have to be brave to make a sexual harassment complaint if you’ve been acting like she’s invisible since she rejected you.

    3. Just like a womans “rape” fantasies. She wants to be raped but only by a man that she wants to rape her.

  25. The irony is so delicious-I’m feasting on it as we speak. Fairfax are the equivalent of Pravda and to see this unfold is nothing short of incredibly satisfying. I cannot begin to contain my delight at the massive schadenfreude; it proves another maxim true also in that whenever one accuses another of something often they are projecting.

  26. Reminds me of the proverb about a wicked man falling into the hole he digs for someone else.

  30. And according to Jessica Valenti, women never lie……..except for when they accuse Bill Clinton

  31. He was supposed to grab her by the pussy, not ass. Fucking Aussies are such wannabees.

  32. In Australia, looking at a woman is class as sexual harassment. It was apart of the extreme OH&S induction I went through recently.

  33. No, you have it all wrong. Let’s welcome Mr. Forbes into our fold, shove the Red Pill down his pasty little throat, and in exchange, he has to write a 3-part mea culpa column for Return of Kings as penance.

    1. I believe shove it up his pasty white ass is more appropriate. That’s how I got it in divorce court.

  35. Fairfax Media’s The Age, & The Sydney Morning Herald are leftist rags which are dying ?? Not too soon ?? P.O.S. media ?? Soon the boofheads & bimbo working for this rags will be pushing trolleys in a supermarket for a living !!

  36. “A second woman has come forward, claiming that Forbes made comments about her breasts at a function earlier in the year.”
    This kind of thing always reminds me of how women can reframe any past history to new ones based on their feelings in the moment. I bet the comment he made was a joke that she found funny at the time, but now that he is accused of sexual assault, she completely reframes her memory and transfers her feeling of disgust in him now to a feeling of disgust from that previous comment. Not to mention this is something she can milk for sympathy and attention.

  37. This should double as gun safety advice, becuse it’s a textbook example of shooting oneself in the foot.

  38. Liberals have always been into Double Standards I mean poor Epsilons and misguided Beta males feel for ‘defending’ women they have a right to rewards from them and get upset at being rejected.

  40. Maybe ROK could turn the other cheek, reach out to Mr. Forbes, and offer to publish his side of the story…
    “Law #2: …Learn how to use enemies: …But hire a former enemy and he will be more loyal than a friend, because he has more to prove…”
    …of course, that’s assuming his side of the story is worth reading.

  41. The MSM is crumbling. Yet more redundancies announced over at Newscorp this week, while ‘The Guardian’ are basically begging for people to become financial ‘contributors’ in their articles..

  42. One of those the few “conservative” journalists Paul Sheehan also disappeared when he published a false rape allegation that Police had already dismissed. Had he followed Roosh’s advice about rape victims running to the media he might still have a job.
    Journalists and Politicians with only female children should be regarded with suspicion. Many seem to align with their daughters values.

  43. As the apparently singular victim of the February 6 violence, I am delighted by whatever misfortune may befall this fellow.

  45. I don’t have a high opinion of Aussies- they have been infected with the poz of cultural marxism, too.

Comments are closed.