Culture

Single Motherhood Causes More Sexual Violence Than A Mythical “Rape Culture”

313 Comments

In 2017, mothers are often venerated as faultless parents, irrespective of the way many of them screw up their kids’ lives. Yet they are only held responsible for the positive aspects that show up in their children. For example, if a young man becomes an investment banker or lawyer after being solely raised by his mother, she is lauded as a superb role model, even a saint. But if that same young man becomes a rapist? Rather than blaming the mother for failing to instill proper values in her son, men across the United States and Western world are instead held collectively responsible for his heinous actions.

The general, if not constant rule of thumb is this: achievements and moral character can be attributed to mothers, whereas violence, particularly violence against women, can be blamed on many millions of male strangers. You could be living in a shack in rural Alaska and you are still considered more responsible for a man in Miami raping a girl than the woman who conceived him, gave birth to him, taught him how to speak, and generally raised him until he was 18 years old (or even older).

If we take America as our starting point, 99.999% of men have never met a particular rapist or have had nothing but insignificant interactions with him. With 160 million males living in the United States, it is fair to say that a convicted rapist has only formed quasi-meaningful relations with about 0.001% of other American males, or 1,600 individuals, throughout his entire lifetime. Even the vast majority of these 1,600 men do not know him intimately (far from it) and have next to no major influence on how he behaves.

And then there’s “Dunbar’s number,” the proposition that human beings can only cultivate stable social relationships with around 150 people, male or female, at any given time. For an average man, that leaves about 75-100 fellow men who can reasonably have a longer-term impact on his actions. Again, most of these people are not overly intimate with the man in question. If anything, only 10-20 of these 150 people can be considered very close to him, a group which in most cases includes his mother and father.

If mothers are not at least partially responsible for a child’s bad or criminal behavior, why are they allowed to look after them?

She gets the plaudits if the child succeeds, but if it goes to jail, blame someone else.

We live in a very strange world indeed. On the one hand, judges award mothers primary custody in between 68 and 88% of cases involving relationship breakdowns that reach the court system. One would think that this is because mothers actually have an ability to affect their child’s development for better or worse, to the point where the father is given only minimal, every second weekend-style contact. It certainly reflects the widely-held social belief that women are more pivotal in the emotional development of their son or daughter.

But whenever the specter of criminal behavior comes up, most notably rape, responsibility that might normally flow to a mother’s parenting can be conveniently offloaded onto the cab driver in Chicago, the window-washer in Seattle, or the policeman in small-town Maine, none of whom will ever meet her son. If this is how society approaches the causal factors of rape, motherhood has to be the most impotent biological and social construct known to humankind. Another male 2,451 miles away in Los Angeles (or 3,470 miles away in London) apparently has more sway over a rapist in New York City he does not know than the rapist’s own mother. What gives?

Single motherhood explains rape much better than “blame all men”

Yes, blame all men if this kid sexually assaults a woman in the future, but the mother did her best!

Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of the natural sciences or some more objectively based social sciences, such as economics, is familiar with the idea that correlation is not causation. For instance, if you get a headache every day the LA Dodgers play, it does not mean that the Dodgers team or individual players caused your head to hurt.

Sadly, notions of causation and even correlation have been severely butchered by feminist sociological tropes such as “rape culture.” If we believe SJWs, Man A wolf-whistles at a hot girl and supposedly this is a partial cause behind Man B raping a girl, even if Man B doesn’t know Man A and wasn’t there when the wolf-whistling happened. Correlation is routinely lacking in these circumstances, let alone the much higher threshold of causation.

But when it comes to trends such as single motherhood or maladjusted mothers, it is easier to observe an actual causal link with criminal behavior. Surprisingly, the notoriously leftist publication Slate once cited a study by Princeton’s Sara McLanahan. In assessing the trajectories of sons raised by single mothers, McLanahan found a massive spike in male incarceration rates compared to sons raised by both biological parents. Even when factors such as poverty, educational standards, and race are taken into consideration, single mothers are still more likely to raise children who become delinquent, criminally-inclined adults.

I am not defending fathers who abandon or neglect their children. Nonetheless, we know for a fact that crime, including violent crime, declines among children growing up in two-parent households, regardless of issues like income, ethnicity, or whether each parent finished high school or attended college. We have zero evidence that a complete stranger is responsible for another man’s rape of a woman and a treasure trove of evidence that the conditions in which a mother raises her son impacts on the likelihood of him committing a violent crime like rape in the future.

Sisters, female cousins, girlfriends and female friends are also more responsible for what their brothers, male cousins, boyfriends and male friends do than complete strangers

“If a man I know rapes, every other man in America is responsible, but not me, his best friend since grade school.”

Why should we limit ourselves to mothers? The ability of a sister, female cousin, girlfriend or female friend to shape someone’s behavior is also much greater than a random man on the street. If we took feminists at their word and adopted the principle of collective responsibility for rape, the only collective responsibility that makes sense is the responsibility of those men and women who actually know the rapist and have decided to spend their time with him. A man who lives on the west coast simply has no opportunity to prevent a rape on the east coast, or even one three blocks from him. But the female best friend or sister, in contact with the rapist almost every day, theoretically does.

Every time a feminist accuses you of some mystical responsibility for a stranger’s rape via “rape culture,” your instinctive response should be that his parents, his mother most of all, should have raised the rapist better. And after that, individuals such as his sisters, female cousins, girlfriend (provided she was not the victim), and female friends are the next people who should have their collective responsibility assessed. If you do not know the man, how could you have possibly done anything to stop the commission of a crime?

“What about personal responsibility, David?”

Some readers will find the feminist claim of collective male responsibility for rape disgusting but still think I am absolving rapists of their own personal responsibility for their actions. “Many and even most mothers cannot be blamed for what their sons do!” is something I would expect to hear. And I agree with that sentiment. Rapists should be held accountable and jailed for years for what they do, provided convictions are secured through hard evidence and not hearsay accepted by kangaroo courts. There are plenty of mothers out there with criminal sons who did their best and are plainly not at fault.

But if society is going to collectively blame all men for someone raping, we need to devote 1,000 times more attention to the potential collective responsibility of his family and social circle, including and particularly his mother. Aside from crackpot explanations based on male-only telepathy, subterranean patriarchal conspiracies, and other feminist circle-jerks, the mantra of collective male responsibility for rape is the most unsupported criminal justice theory in human history. It belongs nowhere but in the academic and scientific trash bin.

Read More: Most Female Leaders Are Only Successful Because Of Their Male Relatives

313 thoughts on “Single Motherhood Causes More Sexual Violence Than A Mythical “Rape Culture””

  2. (0:49) “Somebody needs to pay for all my children. Somebody needs to be held accountable, and they need to pay!”
    Well she’s certainly not gonna take any accountability is she? Or the unflattering arrest record her offspring are going to have.

    1. That shit right there makes me vomit. That thing should have had a hysterectomy after the first welfare case was born.

  3. Sad but true. Unless the woman is truly exceptional and they have a solid network of extended family, the single mom will have loser children.

    1. unless a decent father in their life cockblocks the whore and shows the kids an alternative

      1. Have such a friend who gained custody of his son. They live in a house and his son has space, a quality catholic school, and a good family network through the Caribbean.
        Have another friend, who has five children under his belt. Has them all taken cared while the mother is barely able to live hand to mouth off of government support.
        If the government wanted to increase the productivity of society the most fit parent should be award the child in all cases, instead of the emotional assumption the woman can do better than using the child as an extra source of income and Facebook likes.

    2. Like I said yesterday, there will be 1 or 2 success stories outta every 100 kids, and these stories are always held up by the MSM as a shining example of how single moms and their kids rawk. 2 kids got scholarships to prestigious colleges- what about the other 98?

  4. Personal sexual behavior is set by society. Dennis Prager did a radio show on this a week or so ago when he interviewed a 22 year old lesbian going to college in Canada.
    Rape by our Western definition in Mexico is very high. There, families are better intact than they are here in America. It is OK to marry and have sex with a 12 year old on Mexico. Many illegal Mexicans come here to America, have sex with 12 year old girls (consented by the girl and her parents[!] ) are still are sent to prison for rape. That is for another discussion…
    Point I am trying to make is that sad parenting doesn’t mean a man will go out, see a female, hit her in the head make her submit, then pull her panties down and have sex with her.
    I think that single parenting means the child (male/female) will have greater problems in determining their roles and what is expected of them in their adult life.
    We have seen rapists come from Christian God fearing families with a husband and a wife. I think that single parented children are far more likely to be promiscuous and they don’t have to rape to find partners that are as equally promiscuous.
    Let me back up a bit: My avatar is humorous, but in real life I am black American, 5+ decades of life so far. I grew up in Compton CA and saw little boys fucking little girls. These little girls were not being raped! They were the ones instigating the sexual encounter!
    Look at the black bastard birth rate: 3 out of 4 black births in America are now to single black females … these women were not raped into pregnancy! Most of them encouraged and wanted the pregnancy; just not the male they copulated with!
    Again, sexual behavior is imprinted upon us by society. This isn’t new and through out history, this has occurred. Here are two interesting examples of that:
    1) Spartans. All homosexuals when out on the battle field. I would never want to take on a Spartan, but they were paired: an older male with a younger male. Their society supported this behavior.
    2) Japan. A man has a wife and then a child.. DONE! He can now go off and have as many male lovers as he wishes. Their society imprints this on behavior.
    I don’t blame single mothers for rapists. I do blame single mothers for irresponsible and ineffective children they create. The violence these young thugs exhibit was first learned from the hands, fists, hotwheel tracks, extension cords and belts of their single bitch mothers who took out their frustrations and insecurities on their children.
    Now if the single bitch is sexually abusing the child, then I wouldn’t be shocked if the child grows up as an adult and continues the abuse to other children.
    Bottom line, growing up without a father does cause issues, but stating that rape is the ultimate outcome is a stretch. Maybe if women didn’t twerk naked, have their tits spilling out of their blouses, and their labia flapping in the wind; maybe that would help lower the rape rates in the Western world.
    ————-
    Addendum:
    I did a quick check for countries with the highest rape rates: I believe that Arabs would be the lowest because they keep their women covered up; we can do an article about that later.
    Here are the results:
    http://www.wonderslist.com/10-countries-highest-rape-crime/
    #1 Untied States
    #2 South Africa
    #3 Sweden
    #4 India
    #5 United Kingdom
    #6 Germany
    #7 France
    #8 Canada
    #9 Shri Lanka
    #10 Ethiopia
    I visited other sites and the order changes, but the top countries are still in the top 5/10. No Arab nations in the top of list as I predicted. There is something about playing down the sexuality by wrapping those nice tits and asses up!

    1. A guy I knew was a teacher in LAUSD, and he said that ALL the cases of teacher-student sexual relationships were young male Mexican teachers getting it on with female students — with full consent — after their quincenera. The power of Mexican cultural tradition is stronger than the power of U.S. statutory rape laws.

    2. I heard South Africa was the rape capitol of the world. Probably other african nations would rank similarly if data collection and statistical analysis could be normalized.

      1. Rape reporting is probably a function of societal tolerances (can the women actually report and not be viewed as the instigator for the rape), the laws of that society, and the technical means to tabulate the reports.
        See if we believe the feminist model, cavemen were raping women all day long … that doesn’t make sense! Its the woman who really makes the first move; or at least signals to the male that a move is possible.
        If you believe feminists, then we are all here as a result of thousands of years of rapes… not true!

        1. Its difficult to believe USA is top of the list. I’m guessing that in america feminists skew the data by redefining sexual assault to include things like groping to be attempted rape which blows up the stats. I heard sweden is that way too.

    3. The reason the rape rate is so low in Islamistan is because women are charged with adultery if they come forward with rape accusations.
      Covering up women makes men rape even more. Do you wonder why we have a rapefugee crisis?

      1. No. That’s a stupid feminist excuse.
        The REAL reason rape is so low in Islam is because the of the culture. Homosocial groupings/Virginity/Burkas
        Law is the last reason.

        1. This is an astute observation that represents the tip of a great big iceberg which we in the manosphere are someday going to have to address. Aaaannnndddd I don’t wanna talk any more about it right now.

        3. Think about it, I break into a Muslim man’s home and rape his wife or daughter. I get caught… what are my chances of living?
          The one thing that I admire about the Muslims is that they actually are fanatical about their religion and society.
          There was a story on Drudge this morning about a church here in the U.S. where two lesbians were the church leaders … I rolled my eyes and read something else.
          Here in the West we have corrupted just about every social and government agency including our churches.
          This is due to liberalism and feminism.

        5. Fanatical being the operative word.
          If you believe there is little rape going on in muslim culture, you are duluded.

        6. No, the REAL reason the rape COMPLAINT rate is so low in muslim countries is because according to sharia law a woman needs 4 male muslim eyewitnesses to support her claim of rape or she will have confessed to sex out of marriage which carries the penalty of being stoned to death. So if you were raped, didn’t have the needed 4 witnesses, and knew that claiming to have been raped would mean you’d be put to death, would you make the complaint?

        7. I was thinking the same. Also men diddling the kiddies is alot higher than people are willing to admit.

      2. I have been in countries where the women wear the burqas and things ‘seem’ better between the sexes than they do here in the West.
        I think that once the Muslim migrates to the West and sees the panties showing, the labia flapping, the tits jutting out from the blouses, they lose control. I am not making an excuse for them, just trying to understand.
        I think this topic would make a great article for the site! Great way to get published for those of you looking to be published.

        1. “I have been in countries where the women wear the burqas and things ‘seem’ better between the sexes than they do here in the West.”
          They actually don’t. Saudi men are some of the most beta in the world. They beg women to marry them and women spend their husband’s money at will while sitting on their asses all day.
          “I think that once the Muslim migrates to the West and sees the panties showing, the labia flapping, the tits jutting out from the blouses, they lose control. I am not making an excuse for them, just trying to understand.”
          The same with me when I went to college and I could drink as much alcohol as I want.
          “I think this topic would make a great article for the site! Great way to get published for those of you looking to be published.”
          There was one earlier describing the difference between Christian girls and Muslim girls, explain how Islam cares only about outwardly devotion and how Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker in the 9/11 attacks, went to a strip club prior to proverbially strapping it on for Allah.

    4. how rape is “defined” matters a lot in the numbers. If you took regret rape, I’m not a slut rape, feelings rape and all the other bull shit “rape” cases that are simply not actually rape I bet the US would be damn near the bottom if not dead last on the list.

      1. If you look at the list he posted, it was an account from two years ago. They hyperlinked the new assessments and in two years the number should show America at number 3 instead of 1. Sweden’s numbers have spiked. Wonder how that happened?

        1. Muslim immigration … it is like a child in a candy store!
          I personally believe that women should cover up more! Yes girl friend you have a vagina, I know, my penis lets me know, so you don’t have to spread your legs and go hoping down the street displaying it!
          Its like with porn, yes many of those bitches are my fantasy, but would I make them the mother of my children? NO! Would I put them in my will … NO! Would I give them access to my bank and brokerage accounts … NO!
          My wife I can trust; a porn whore I will never trust! Then there are those here that say I shouldn’t trust my wife either! 🙂

      2. Correct. The numbers are skewed in the US as the definition keeps getting broader. Last I checked, 25% of rape claims by women turned out to be BS. The under reported numbers would be the kids of single moms as they would have a finanical interest of keeping those checks rolling in.

        1. I think 25% is a gross underestimate. I think the number of rape claims that aren’t actually rape (rape being defined as grabbing someone against their will and forcing sex while they are fighting back) is much closer to 80%

        2. Would agree. The violent type of rape is more common in the usual “diverse” places like south Chicago, Phili, Detroit, LA, etc… and the victims (eg. crack whore) don’t match the media narrative of the victims they want to portray.

        3. right. I am not saying it doesn’t happen but if we define rape simply as a Man physically (or through direct threats) forcing a woman to have sex against her will I think that maybe, maybe 20% of the rape claims are legit. Those guys should be strung up by their dicks and I do genuinely pity the broads that suffer that kind of abuse. That said, our American standard of rape is so absurd that it is laughable. The word rape means absolutely noting anymore because it has been extended past critical mass. It is no different than ramalama ding dong

      1. Being homosexual in Japan doesn’t have the same stigma as it does here in the United States; once you have made the obligatory marriage and one child rule.
        Here in America, even a ‘homo’ wants to be a top/dominant unless they are flaming and play the submissive feminine role.
        I work for a government agency, and there are guys here that are gay as f*ck, but they have tattoos, big muscles and ride hogs!
        I don’t mind gay men; the flamers are the most entertaining.

    6. Muslim (Arab) nations have low rape rates because they practice sharia law, and a woman needs 4 MALE muslim eye witnesses to support her rape claim, or she’s found guilty of sex outside of marriage, and she is stoned to death. That’s how muslim countries keep the rape COMPLAINT rate low, but we have no meaningful measure of their actual rape rate.
      One thing that has been shown is one thing that lowers the actual rape rate is legalization of prostitution. There are those who falsely claim rape is about “power, not sex”. Wrong, it’s about sex. That’s why over 90% of female rape victims are young, sexually attractive women. See https://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com for some very good and well sourced information about both of these facts.

  5. I had a lazy Saturday a few weekends ago and binge watched the television show “The Hunt.” It’s about crimes that were committed mostly against children, and most of the perpetrators are still out on the lamb.
    After a few episodes, it became abundantly clear that single mothers are terrible judges of character. They would meet some random guy who befriended their kid, he seemed nice, so they let a guy they’ve know for a grand total of a week watch their kid for 8 hours every day. After a while, the kid starts exhibiting strange behavior, the mother suspects rape, the perv skips town, and it’s confirmed that the guy was not only a child molester, but had done it in multiple other towns (usually sexually abusing kids in single mother households).
    What’s even more sickening is the mothers’ attention-whoring: “I can’t believe this happened to me. How could he do this to me?” You weren’t the one who was raped. The kid was, and it’s because you let some shady fucker into your home.

    1. If they were good judges of character, they probably wouldn’t be single mothers in the first place.

      2. hell, even if they were good judges of BBQ they probably would still have a husband

    2. I saw this in real life. Typical ROK overweight, post-wall, career-gal specimen started to get lonely and adopted a child. Meets some dude who insinuates himself into her life very quickly, coming over to “help her out” etc… and lots of offers to watch the kid. At first, she thinks this dude is in to her, but when she asks, he flatly says no, he’s interested in “mentoring” her adopted daughter. This fucking retard continued to let this sketchy fucker hang around for almost a month. I don’t believe she ever let the two of them be alone together, but I also said flatly that if I heard she did, I would report her to child protective services – and for those who are familiar with my posting history, I fucking hate CPS, so you can imagine how serious I considered this if I was willing to unleash those fucktards. Absolutely no judgment whatsoever, and driven in part by the you’re-the-best-snowflake-since-sliced-bread bullshit she has been fed her whole life. Sure, some attractive, apparently successful, witty, intelligent, charming and funny dude is only hanging around because of your 80lb overweight, sarcastic, jet-setting self. Yeah. That’s it.

      1. I’m always wary of people who ingratiate themselves to those who are most susceptible (the elderly, children, foreigners with language barriers, and dumb ass single mothers who think they’re strong and independent). They are always playing some sort of angle.

      2. Did you hear about the woman who needed a hysterectomy, who was a single mom of a 13 YO daughter, and was concerned about losing her boyfriend due to the six week no-sex recovery period, and so the three of them worked out a deal where the 13 YO would provide sex to the boyfriend while mom recovered? Yeah, that’s good judgement right there.

        1. You know, this brings up an area where I have great internal conflict. On one hand, this is terrible for the kid, who is a victim. On the other hand, a kid who has been raised by someone like this is fucked for life. At some point, we have to consider that these kids should probably be forcibly sterilized just like their parents to prevent the spread of this nonsense.

        2. Oddly enough, the kid was OK with it, because her part of the deal was she would be allowed to get a tattoo and she wouldn’t have to pay for it. So she didn’t see herself as a victim.
          I just thought 2 things:
          1) What kind of scumbag boyfriend would leave his girlfriend because she had an operation that prevented sex for 6 weeks?
          2) Had they never heard of oral?

    3. “Death by mommy’s boyfriend” is a rampant and widespread problem. And it is 100% the single mother’s fault.

    4. Biggest threat to a child is mom’s new boyfriend/husband. It’s why I stayed calm and non-confrontational in my divorce so my kids would be living with me and not mom. She visited, it worked so far- kids aren’t into drugs/alcohol, no criminal records, one completed college and two working their way through in degrees with employment potential.

    5. Kids should by default be given to the fathers. It’s ridiculous to hand them over to the mothers. Nothing more than sentimental idiocy.
      Marriage is an exchange. Male agrees to give provision and protection in exchange for the Female’s reproductive abilities.
      All fruits of said union belong to the guy who paid for the use of said reproductive abilities, ie the Man. It’s not pretty, it’s not romantic, it upsets beta males and gamma faggots to no end, and it also actually works for everyone. Including single mothers, because then they can get a new mate without carrying a ball and chain.
      Now that’s unfair, you say. No not really. She can also get knocked up outside of marriage too. We used to call those “bastards” which means “no father has any responsibility to this kid whatsoever”. That doesn’t mean he can’t do nice things, or that the mother can’t invite him into her life if she likes, it means that the kid is solely the mothers’ responsibility and care.
      What we have effectively done with our current bullshit is turn ALL CHILDREN into bastards. Handing over a paycheck is not “responsibility”, it’s underwriting more of the shitty decision making of another stupid, out of control woman.
      Some preachy supplicating asshole judge got it into his head that he was going to suck up to all women everywhere, and insisted, in contrary to any reason, evidence, law, moral code, or just plain common sense that the child should go with the mother “jus cause”. From that moment we were all fucked.

  6. The article made some great point. However, there is an objection.
    The photos attached to the article almost suggest that only Black women end up being single mothers.
    In the US and an the UK there are just as many White single mothers as there are Black ones.

    2. Maybe you should look at, you know, all of the photos and not just the one that you find “problematic”, chief.

    3. I think the figure for children born outside marriage to single mothers is 78% of all births among blacks in the US……. that’s kind of a high percentage……

      2. … and out of wedlock births among whites is at about 30%, exactly where it was among African-americans about 30 years ago. We very well could be on the same path for everyone…
        Ever read George Gilder’s, “Men and Marriage”?

        1. Actually the OOW birth rate for white women under 30 today is about 50%. In 1965 the OOW birth rate for the black community was about 25%.

  7. “Even when factors such as poverty, educational standards, and race are taken into consideration, single mothers are still more likely to raise children who become delinquent, criminally-inclined adults.”
    Yes … in America.
    BUT
    In many other countries, this phenomenon doesn’t exist, probably because other societies have maintained stronger connections with extended family and friends and neighbors. It’s hard for a boy to go truly bad when seven different adults are keeping an eye on him.
    It’s a complicated world.

    1. Maybe eastern, Asian countries. I can attest that in the UK and Ireland it is pretty much the same story as the US. So many bitter divorcees and dole scum single mothers……

    1. Damn that would make a great flyer to stick in the walls of men’s shitter stalls. Is there a high-res version anywhere?

      3. You can click on it to get it bigger. Google reverse image search should work if you want a even bigger version.

    2. Just need the source of the study that produced those numbers. Provides incredible legitimacy.

        1. Legitimate uncriticized sources are written in APA, or MLA formatting. Those do not contain journal numbers, magazine pages, paragraphs or authors……..dude or even the specific studies
          The source for the Department of Corrections does not specify White, Hispanic, Black, or Asian children or even which year ,which I tried to research and could not find “85%”. The way the MSM provides information and twisted truths, you have to provide the evidence in an unarguable form. You can’t just throw numbers up to give them room to twist and fabricate…….dude.

        3. You asked for sources and you got sources. Whether or not you like those sources is another matter.

        4. Those things you listed are not required if citing a government institution’s database online. This is like asking for proof a standard reaction that has been carried out for decades works (ACS doesn’t even have archives of them).

    3. This is a bunch of fucking nonsense which suggests that individual criminality is caused by rearing rather than the life choices of individual would be criminals. The co-variance that may exist is a long way from causality. My brother and I grew up dirt poor with with a single mom. We both obtained advanced degrees, I own a successful business and he’s a fucking scientist.

        3. I didn’t see Englishbob insult your mother. I think he indicated he found your story unbelievable. In some ways, that suggests your mother was an extraordinary woman.
          And even moreso, if you argued that “life choices of individual” trump child-rearing, that would take your mother’s rearing of you out of the equation altogether, wouldn’t it? In your opinion, you turned out the way you did due to your and your brother’s individual choices along with the genetic/behavioral components of your mother AND father!
          Yes?
          I know plenty of amazing single mothers but they don’t fit the typical profile of most modern single mothers who banged around irresponsibly, bought sperm (or milked it) to have children out of wedlock, used the child for a welfare check etc. They were usually widows or perhaps decided that their husband had substance abuse issues, etc and they decided to move on (often without demanding any support whatsoever). I could have married some of them but I was young and couldn’t handle that challenge easily.

        8. Give me her phone number and I will be glad to. I will however, tell her it was at your request.

        9. We don’t know that. Yes, a large percentage of single moms are whores, just as a huge percentage of all modern western women are whores. That does not mean his single mother was a whore.

      2. The truth is bullshit once again.
        I didn’t see where it claimed 100% of children raised by single mothers would fail. You’re just a fucking imbecile

      4. I’m glad you and you brother succeeded, I really am. I work in the jail system and I can assure you that there are exceptions and then the rule. Life choices are very important and some people grow up and finally get it. Others just let themselves be chained to the criminal justice system because they know no other way and have zero support or guidance. What’s your normal? That’s how I explain a lot of inmate behaviour. When you see a child’s swing set outside of a jail, that explains the never ending cycle of criminal behaviour.

        1. Would you say that most inmates are mentally ill? Whenever I have had to deal with people who are violent or grossly anti-social, they never seem like they are the “full ticket”.

        2. I would certainly say that sociopathic behaviour is most prevalent among inmates. Certainly the alphabet diagnosis and labeling at an early age combined with no solid parenting makes for a very troubled individual. Remember though, these inmates grow up in highly dysfunctional environments where they need to develop survival skills at a a very early age. These skills can consist of lying, stealing, cheating, sexual favour/predator behaviour in order to gain money/drugs/sex. Being in jail is a nice safe, solid, structured environment for many. You and I have a very visceral “yuck” response to jail. Many count on jail as a respite to get nourished, showered, clean laundry and healthcare.
          So yes, when you meet someone who is a chronic criminal, your bad vibe meter should start alarming.

      7. No, a mom’s choices do have a huge influence on how her sons turn out, but 95% of that influence is in the genetics of the man whom she chooses to be the father.

      8. And exactly how does this refute the statistics? I didn’t see anywhere where there was a claim that 100% of all children raised by single moms went to jail.

        2. In Greece MTV brought once a reality show a such…
          Hopefully it wasn’t successful!
          By the way Juno was the only such movie that did not throw the blame entirely to the boyfriend, too much truth for holywood heh! :^D

    5. Great poster man, but you know it will get taken down in a heartbeat, UNLESS you glue that sucker to the wall in such a way as to be a massive pain in the ass to scrape off

  9. Glad to see some good articles instead of the garbage that was attacking capitalism last week…

        1. I don’t have a the twitters. Can I see it without being his friend

      3. What about that Soviet Russian guy that they’d trot out occasionally, who would sometimes get into spats with Hulk Hogan and Rowdy Roddy Piper? I forget his handle, and am too lazy to be arsed to look it up, but you know who I’m talking about I assume?

    3. Quit ‘sperging over that article.
      You have the same tone of the idiots who think ‘God Bless America’ and ‘One Nation Under God’ makes America a theocracy or a Christian nation.

  10. Looking back on the ex-gfs i had there are only few that i would like to get run over by a bus. However…every one of them was raised by a single mother. Coincidence? Doubt it.

    1. You should try to get together with a girl from a stable family. Night and day most of the time.

      1. I agree but, I bet it’s hard to find one now that doesn’t have divorced parents.

        1. There are plenty out here, but you have to move away from the “club” and bar scene to find them. Almost all of my daughter’s peer group are about to graduate high school and all come from two parent homes. They also, interestingly, say “Thank you” and “Please”, are pleasant, smile and have manners. Coincidence?

        2. Everyone I know who met their wife at a bar or club are divorced. Some started going back to clubs to look for another one. Some folks never learn.

        3. The virtuous, traditional women are a hot item. If they are on the market for only a couple years at most. By the time they can get into the clubs (21), they are gone. You want to find a good one? Network and cold approach.

        4. Guy 1: Let me introduce you to my wife
          Guy 2: nice to meet you. How did you guys find each other
          Guy 1: I was in a place which serves intoxicating beverages and which people only go to when they want to have anonymous drunken sex before slinking home covered in cum and shame
          Guy 2: oh, well, uhm
          Girl: AND THEN WE GOT MAAARIIIIIIEEEEEEDDDD

        6. Networking is where it’s at. I met my wife through a mutual friend (female friend).

        7. Same here. A classmate, (now a successful Civil Engineer, but single) introduced her roommate, my wife.

        10. “i had to marry her. I have never met a girl who sucks cock as well as she does” or any variant of it you might as well just hand the woman all your money and move into a shitty apartment. At least you will save some time.

        11. I would think for any thinking man, the better the blowjob, the less likely you should marry them.

        12. “High school girls- I get older, they stay the saaaaaaaaammmme age…”

        14. That has always made sense to me. I never understood why a guy would marry a woman based on advanced skills at pleasuring men. I’m not saying they shouldn’t enjoy. Hell thats all I want. But marry?

        15. I have to admit, my wife’s bedroom skills lacked pretty severely when we first married. But, with time she got to be pretty good at what she does.

        16. My bowling skills are, presumably, quite lacking. I have never gone bowling before. I imagine that with time, effort and desire I could learn to bowl fairly well. I am a coordinated and athletic guy. Not saying I could be the best bowler ever, but I am sure I could figure out how to do it passably well. However, if you took me to a bowling alley today I assure you that I would not be able to do it very well right off the bar.

        20. Its been so long ago I don’t even remember where I met mine but, it wasn’t at at a club.

        22. Guy 1-she blew me in the alley behind the club, then I just knew she was the one for me!

        26. Well when you put your tallywhacker in there and that wonder wheel starts spinning against it, your eyes cross so you can’t see straight and it erases your better judgement.
          The wonder wheel is one of the many tools of the devil.

        27. Except you would be good. Sex isn’t that difficult for women in the same way bowling is not difficult for athletic guys.

        28. And you have to be willing to deal with their fathers. Date my daughter and I will call you be a number, not your name.
          You may not be around very long, so I’m not gonna get attached.
          If I start to think of you as human it will make it a little harder to do what might need to get done.

        29. … imagine in a few years. The meetup will be something like- I was swiping through random people on an app for hooking-up and saw her profile claiming she could deep throat a horse… (…fill in the details after that).

        33. Like you have?
          What do you know about talent?
          You think athletes need experience to bowl. Well we don’t need practice anymore than women need to ride the carousel to get good at being fucked.
          Keep believing that NY sex and the city feminist bull shit.

        35. And I love it when New Yorkers refer to other major cities as “country” it’s so cunty.

        36. Well as long as you love it.
          Geez dude, you have your period or something. Just scrolled up to see how this started. You are pretty easy to trigger huh.
          Have a nice night. Maybe meditate or do some yoga.

        37. I still say ‘please’ and ‘thank you’ all the time but credit it to strict private school.
          I also always hold a door for anyone — male or female. And there’s nothing that enrages me more than the cunt who walks past without making eye contact. I do not demand a “thanks” but at least a smile and nod.
          Whenever some bitch can’t even do this, I always make it a point to exclaim in a loud voice, “Yea. No Problem. I’ve got the Door.”

        38. Yep…knew a guy in the 80s who married a woman because she liked anal…who know s what happened to them…

        41. I met my first wife at University …… she asset stripped me after 30 years.
          It isn’t about their character, it’s about the opportunity your countries laws give them.
          All you guys in denial spouting the ‘my wife is different’ mantra, are all looking to take a fall.

        42. There always exceptions it ain’t a perfect world. Regardless of where they come from women are still women but, if you want to try to marry one up, not getting her from a bar is still good advice.

        43. At least the ones you meet in bars will have frequent sex with you. The ‘goods ones’ always seemed a bit cold to me. But hey, a lot of guys are looking for ‘mom’, whatever floats your boat is good.

        44. Can’t disagree with that, paying child support for my only child, met her mom at “Catholic” University, never got married before we split and kid was 2. Never ever had a close call knocking up a girl until then at 33yo. Daughter’s 9 now and the truth is it’s been a nightmare for my daughter and I.
          Her mom’s all about that child support paycheck.

        45. If / when I nail a slut in the ass, it usually signals me to try any ridiculously demeaning shit I can dream up.. which thus means I’m 0-3 visits from ending it with her. Good Ole “butt I let you fucke me in the ass, I don’t let anyone do that!” Sure, tata whore.

        49. You’d be incorrect. This is a lily white area.

        50. Projecting your own experiences onto others as a universal thing is an error. Some will take it in the shorts, others will not.

        51. I’m athletic as all hell. I can’t pick up a sport I’ve never done before and end up good at it right off the bat. Nobody can, even the best superstar stood one day listening to a coach say “No, first you hit the ball THEN you run”

      4. Well there always were a lot of other issues. Most of the time the sex drive decreased some months into the relationship, whereas the nagging and bitching increased. So i always went lolknee’s way (stable o’gals).
        Besides, my most sexually satisfying relationship was with a girl whose father was murdered and grew up in an abusive home. So generally there is no rule i think.

    2. LOL, same for me.
      Had my longest relationship with a girl that was raised by a german mother who embraced racial interbreeding with a kurdish man. She has lots of halfsisters and halfbrothers because this kurdish guy made a lot of german women pregnant. (It’s just coincidence that german women where standing at train stations welcoming arab men!)
      Then another one with a girl that was raised by a german mother who got pregnant due to a ONS with a czech man.
      Then another one with a girl that was raised by a german mother who – finally – had a baby with a german man but the man was a rapist (Of course! All german men rape all the time just as they turn millions of people into lampshades and soap).

    3. Almost as bad as single mother, were parents who stayed together and the dad is either cucked royale, or the total bitch and wife is the man.. that might actually be worse. Daughter’s of that formation truly believe women run shit everywhere, because, well, their “traditional” upbringing says so.

  11. The problem with single motherhood becoming mainstream began when we started calling them heros instead of hoes. Thanks Murphy Brown.

    1. Quayle was absolutely correct to call out that show. 100% correct. He also said a lot of other things that were quite correct, prescient and intelligent. There’s a reason why the Left went full haywire trying to make him out to be a bumbling idiot, they know a threat when they see one. I’m not saying that he’s the smartest guy in the GOP, but he’s not the dummy that the left spent millions of dollars propagandizing against to make him appear “stupid”.

      2. They made it so the only thing that people knew about him was that he couldn’t spell potatoe……potato….dammit TATERS.

        2. No it was Quayle. He was at an elementary spelling bee, they asked him to spell potato, he put an “e” on the end and the press ruined him.

        3. He was joking, and the press knew it. Quayle was the spelling bee judge, he had the card saying “potato” right in front of him. The kid spelled the word, then Quayle asked: “what about the ‘E’?”.
          It was a pretty good tease of the kid, really.

        4. I don’t recall the details I just recall the press running with it for weeks insinuating that he was stupid.

      3. Candice Bergen at the age of 56, the actress who played Brown said this ten years after Quayle’ remark in 2002:
        “I never have really said much about the whole episode, which was endless. But his speech was a perfectly intelligent speech about fathers not being dispensable and nobody agreed with that more than I did.”
        She was 56 and still a liberal, natch, but said her father was always a conservative.

        1. Yesterday’s liberal is today’s conservative. Yesterday’s conservatives are now called extremists or wing nuts. You believe in the primacy of the traditional family? Nazi! The ground has shifted and what is considered acceptable today was just crazy talk 20 years ago.

        2. Personally I think that its criminal that Vader had to wait 20 years to see his son and only knew about his daughter minutes before his death.

      4. I don’t know….politicians sounding off about TV is almost as bad as Hollywood weighing in on politics…

      5. It’s funny you pointed this out. Growing up, I always thought Quayle was the fool the media portrayed him as not knowing any better then about the deceitful tactics of the Left and the media like I do now. Unplugging from the matrix makes you wonder about what you were taught in the past. Was it true or was it engineered so you can be controlled. Quite frightening yet enlightening.

        2. Not at all. If you look up his actual statements at the time, it wasn’t unintelligent at all.

        3. I never said he was unintelligent. But I actually remember his statements from the time. The point is that he had a habit of dropping some serious verbal howlers.

      7. Remember how the idiot left kept insisting that Gerald Ford was a clumsy oaf? The fact that he had been a football player on two national championship teams in college. And he was the MVP for one of those teams not a bit player or bench warmer.

    2. Even worse, it allowed for the idea that a woman could be successful professionally, have a bastard, and then find the guy of her dreams to become accepted in the mainstream.

      1. Yes, it made single mommery the new big thing back in the early 90s.
        (I never watched it only heard about it) the MSM and the left couldn’t get enough of it.

        1. IT was one of those shows that was so popular that despite never having seen a single episode I know the basic plot. Single and hyper successful news woman doing her own thing in a mans world and beating them at their own game raising a kid with her gay best fried and showing the world she can make it fucking kill me

        2. I remember a wise-cracking dude that was forever painting her house. I simply assumed he was railing her.

        4. Murphy Brown had a man jaw and a deep husky voice too. She didn’t shy away from showing her competence to clearly less skilled men. She didn’t need no man. She was one of the original insidious feminist a bombs whose fallout has poisoned our society, probably for generations.

      2. Yeah back in the late 80’s/early 90’s. It was one of those shitcoms that was about some career broad who eventually was knocked up in her late 30’s.

        2. We were kids at roughly the same time and I remember this shit. Her and her oversized brown suit jacket. I made it my business to change the channel if that lady was on the television. Even if it was just a commercial.

        4. That was probably one of the shows I’ll have to look up one of these days; I was born in the 80s.

        5. I watched and enjoyed that show when it was on. I have never gone back to watch because I fear it will be one of those things that I look at and wonder what the fuck I saw in it.

        8. Lucky bastard. There was only one TV in the house at the time and that was one of the shows my mother would watch come hell or high water. It was one of the reasons I saved up my allowance for a clunker black and white TV.

        9. Ya know you never really see the indoctrination of feminism being pushed on you as a kid… just seems like silly slap-stick humor, there were a few shows I liked as such and obviously it never clicked. That’s why feminism teaches kids in grade school now, to supersede even the most traditional of parents … it’s their first experience at everything.. so they’re certain to be perfect system robots until death.
          I did love me some Married With Children though.. so spot on. I had one main GF all through high school who looked almost exactly like Christina Applegate..less bimbo-ish, except with a shorter gymnast’s body… she caught a lot of Al and Bud’s lines from me. Now she’s married to a fat nephrologist. Funny.

    4. “The problem with single motherhood becoming mainstream began when we started calling them heros instead of hoes.”
      I’d go further and say when the Christian Church started doing it as opposed to general culture.
      One of my standing issues with the US Christian Church is that it makes a big stink about gay marriage when it does nothing to correct the mistakes of Reagan concerning no-fault divorce.

    5. I’m an old timer and it was before Murphy Brown. Portraying single mothers as heroes goes back to the early 70’s with a show called “Alice” about a single mother working as a waitress at a diner to make ends meet (the show had a catchy catchphrase: “Kiss my grits!”) and another show: “One day at a time” also about a heroic single mother. I think both of them were divorced. Previously, a landmark film, “Kramer vs Kramer” addressed the court system discrimination against men and helped spur serious discussion about treating men better in the court system.
      The 1970’s was the era of the “nice feminist” myth portraying career women and single mothers as heroes fighting against sexist men in the workplace while pulling their own weight without special perks and living up to male responsibilities. Many WOMEN even bought into it leaving a vestigial reminder of the era that persists largely uniquely in American culture today: women making a fake offer on a date to pay their own way. Why did they do this? I think it was because feminists were pushing for the ERA and socialist programs such as government subsidized daycare and paid leave for career women and they sought to show that feminism was “nice” so men would benefit too.

      1. I remember Alice she was the Karate Kids mom, also a single mother, if it weren’t for Mr Miogi he would have grown up to be Bruce Jenner.

  14. The first arrest of my law enforcement career came in 1990 in Brooklyn, NYC. A mother and daughter got into a physical exchange over welfare benefits going to the daughters child. A natural question-where is the kids father?- got me the “look” from the other guys. You don’t ask that question new guy, leave that alone. I’m no philosopher, social worker or anthropologist, I just speak from experience. Single mom kids with no fathers in their lives just run wild. The majority of perps I encounter have no biological fathers in the picture. This condition cuts through race and economic levels. Black, white, rich or poor these guys have so little respect for others-and themselves. And the replacement of fathers by the government check book is the single biggest problem. Oh, I just got the “look” You don’t mention that fact…..

    2. Ever read George Gilder’s, “Men and Marriage”? A good take on where we were headed written a couple of decades ago…

      1. I’ll have to check it out, thanks. Theodore Dalrymple is another good read on this subject.

  15. Caught this today and it fits the thread.
    “Mother and boyfriend charged after her 14-year-old adopted daughter was raped, slaughtered and chopped up”
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4099452/Mother-s-boyfriend-shared-rape-murder-fantasy-charged-raping-killing-14-year-old-daughter-Grace-Packer.html#ixzz4VOS673ox
    “Packer reportedly profited off her daughter’s murder. She lied that Grace was still alive so she could collect her social security checks.”
    They left out, dear old single mom was emplyed as a social worker.

    1. yes and we are all fat losers who live in our mothers basement and masturbate all day while playing video games.

        2. Better use that My Little Pony Afro-comb to cleanse that majestic scruff ball.

      2. … and eating cheetos, we must be eating cheetos to conform with her stereotype..
        (Edited to correct the spelling of Cheetos; my apologies to Frito-Lay)

        3. The image is definitely incomplete without the aspect of orange stained fingers and wieners– given being fat losers constantly and bitterly masturbating.

        8. But that contradicts her stereotype, she thinks all men who don’t automatically grovel to women are angry and bitter.
          (Also, term came to mind as one of the names my brother and his friends considered for a band was “Bitter Masturbation”‘ which for some reason I find amusing)

        9. Problem with cheetos, the cheese dust isn’t much of a lubricant and probably absorbs/dries up any lubricant one tries to use.

      3. So that’s how you get all the chicks, gee and all this time I thought it was by working out, having a succesful job, and treating women like they should be treated.

    2. And we all have small wieners……well, all except for me, if you don’t believe it, just ask your mom.

      1. I have a really small wiener, but kratom has the spinach/popeye effect

        1. I was wondering about the space elevator proof of concept we’ve been hearing about. You’ve been hitting the ‘Tom.

    6. I was raised by a single mother and feminist. It’s taken me years to repair the damage done by my upbringing. I’m extremely lucky I never went to jail – I definitely deserved to.

  17. A single mother here in Melbourne, has actually taken to chaining her son to his bed to stop him from going out and stealing cars with one of the street gangs. Can’t say she isn’t trying!

      1. That article cements Man’s place in the Animal Kingdom, no different between us and elephants!

  18. Do single moms dominate online dating sites yet? I figure its a matter of time. Society is sliding down that slope with the majority of kids being raised that way, while mommy brings home dates to bang her in the next room.

  19. Single motherhood is simply long-term child abuse mandated by the government, and of course theft of men’s lives. Time=Money=Freedom to some extent. Thus, theft of men via taxes and wasted time to support single-motherhood is also incremental murder of men. Add to that the perpetuity of nearly instantaneous social degradation – in just 1-2 brief generations – undoubtedly “someone’s” special plans have worked perfectly on society for control. Fuck them ALL.

  21. The actual FBI rape statistics are .05% per 100,000 people. Unless its reported; prosecuted etc.. its just non-sense to listen to anything. Its still a lot but .058% if you die..so not much better or worse and rare.

    1. Be careful with the numbers now… what does “.05% per 100’000 people” even mean?
      .05% of 100’000 is 50. Are you saying that 50 people was raped/raped someone? Out of what population, during which time? Or that .05% of the US population have been raped/raped someone? (Then, what does “100’000 people” mean?) What is the source?
      Besides, what does this figure count? Convictions? Prosecutions? Even if a certain crime has very low levels of prosecutions, it does not imply that the crime in itself is uncommon (it may simply be difficult to prosecute). For example, burglaries are quite common, but few burglary cases ever reach the courts.

  22. One way to see the worth of a single mother is to look at her child(ren). Are they well behavior, good students…?
    That will tell if see cares about her child(ren) and not dropping them off to grandma’s house so she could out clubbing.

      1. That’s a blanketed statement that certainly is not true however like I said a good indication is to look at the child(ren) and that will reflect strongly on the mother. My caveat would be proceed with cation it is a red flag.

        1. It’s true if she is single by choice, because having a child without a father is Child Abuse. Children need a mother and a father (of different sexes) in order for proper development.

  25. I was just talking about this because Charles Manson was recently in the news. Manson is the result of a negligent and abusive mother, which is typical of serial killers and deviants. Women, however, virtually always take all of the credit but none of the blame. They see their value as in simply showing up.
    My opinion is that primal mammalian biological imperatives, including the gender dynamic, which helped modern humans thrive in a primitive, non-technological environment, still guide our modern behaviors and perceptions. Women, as the physically inferior mammalian birth-givers and caretakers, depended on their abilities to manipulate and exploit men in order to survive. As parasitic and opportunistic creatures, human females would have little regard for those they exploit. Women essentially see men as a necessary evil whose value is based on what they contribute. Now that modern man-made technologies have mitigated female deficiencies and diminished male strengths, females no longer need to directly exploit men and feel more free to express their intrinsic hubris and hatefulness.
    Mothers, as female mammalian birth-givers, form mutual biochemical bonds with their children and therefore are internally motivated. They need constant affirmations and assurances. They seek validation from everyone they interact with. They have to be loved and appreciated the most or it damages their fragile self-esteem. This causes women to expect their children to cleave to them and be dependent on them. It’s very ego-centric. Women always see the world as revolving around their wants and needs. They see the home and children as strictly their domain, and the father, no matter the circumstances, as the disposable assistant-to-the-parent whose primary function is financial. Even when women lose custody of their children, they quite often resist paying child support. Women only see men as a co-parent when it is convenient for them.
    Men form non-mutual biochemical bonds with their children and are therefore result oriented. This makes it easier for men to leave and do what’s necessary to benefit their families without the angst a mammalian mother would feel. Men’s primary motivations are to provide for and protect their families. Men instinctively understand that the day-to-day caretaking and nurturing is usually the milieu of the female mammalian birth givers, though. Fathers deal more with specific behavioral issues because they are more interested in guiding their children to be productive adults who will contribute to society, especially within the primal gender dynamic. Single motherhood can be very damaging to children. It is much easier for fathers to fulfill the maternal aspect of parenting than for women to fill the father’s shoes. It is male parental strengths that temper female parental weaknesses and ensure successful progeny. Take strong fathers out if the equation and we destroy all of the qualities that created civilizations with all of the comforts and opportunities that we all enjoy.
    At their psychological core, human females thrive on chauvinism, misandry, and a collective victim mentality. This makes females immensely susceptible to pandering by the marketing companies who then bolster intrinsic female hubris and hatefulness for the sake of profits. Because women mutually bond with their children and generally have unfettered access to them, these traits undoubtedly influence the attitudes of their children. Inept mothering can have an extremely deleterious effect on children’s psyches. I believe that this phenomenon will be a major factor in the not-too-distant downfall of western civilization.
    As with anything, nothing is absolute. There will always be exceptions and aberrations. I’m speaking more in a bell curve sense.

    1. This post is bullshit. Lost of mothers do not form “bonds” with their kids these days. Many mothers I know today are negligent.

  26. I saw an Ad council commercial a few years back that began with the caption: “When a man assaults/victimizes a woman, he assaults ALL women. The commercial was a rallying cry to get ALL women mad at THAT man and to gang up on him. Now that was the bait, getting all women mad at an actual perpetrator.
    NEXT what you hear is, get this, “When a man assaults a woman, ALL men are asaulting women”. See the bait and switch they just did? The commercial is clearly encouraging a form of managed psychotic behavior by blaming all men for one single act perpetrated by one man presumably.
    Blaming everyone else for clearly unrelated issues is psychotic behavior and the article is spot on pointing out the disconnect. We can clearly see how radfems are fundamentally psychotic at their core. Women weren’t meant to be philosophers or sage thinkers. They have no beards. Without beards, they are excellent domestic work animals, they are partners, they are breeders . . but thinkers? . . . bwaa-haa-haa! That’s a good one. This female promulgated ‘feminist’ doctrine, whoever beardless imbacel thought of it, is really a methodology of administering suggestive psychosis. What great bearded female thinker was it that formulated or ‘invented’ feminism? Wait a munite. Females don’t have beards. Feminism came from a non-bearded one. Feminism is therefore invalid. A few bare stupidchin women are at it again, trying to start a war with this feminism bullshit. Men, get your powerbeard on!
    http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/manly-beards-lead.jpg?quality=85&strip=info&w=500
    http://r.hswstatic.com/w_907/gif/stufftoblowyourmind-23-2013-06-beardofwar.jpg

    1. I’m not sure women are any good for being partners. Sex toys, child minders and baby producers, yes …….but most aren’t even all that good as domestic servants.

      1. Most women can reasonably perform domestic service to the best of their abilities [If they want to]. Feminism has implanted a nasty smack of incontinence into their psyches, a revolting snappy backtalking rejection of the qualified authority of THE MAN over them. Feminized women selectively dispute THE MAN’S word and they overcompensate reflexively doing whatever the mob governing body urges them to do. Women snitch and rat out their men to the authorities if the men don’t supplicate to them and bow down as beta servants to them.
        Feminism really has empowered especially the rock bottom lowest tier of women to boss their man around. In this vid we see a retarded woman who wouldn’t likely have even had a partner of any sort. She lacks ability for domestic duty completely. Perhaps she runs ‘duuuh hole’ skeet game on her own class omegas? But special ed combined with ‘go girl’ taught her how to shut a man up and put him in his place for 10 years!

        Without feminism, society and the sexual marketplace would have thrown this damaged special ed woman clear off the smv scale and beneath the paper completely. . . or society would have maybe pointed a shotgun at her and ordered her to crawl back into her mamas pussy from whence she came and to not come out until she’s done being developed. But there she is with some man, ordering him by the balls to continue cohabitating exclusively with her. “NO, mee’z goin home with you”. Haha, pretty bold words huh?

    1. Statistically. But there are exceptions, my Dad was raised by a single mother on Chicago’s south side during the depression. He was the best man I have ever known. She sacrificed by not getting involved with anyone else, focusing on her kids. And getting him around his uncles (particularly in the summer getting him out of the city onto the uncle’s farm).

        1. No problem, it’s easy to agree with the truth. Issue as a single Dad I had was– very little statistics available on the affects of being raised by a single father. What were the pitfalls, patterns to look for and guard against.

        2. In my opinion a child needs both (normal) parents, mom and dad, that is ideal…I don’t think a single parent dad can compensate for anything…also a single parent mom cannot.
          Uncles and aunts are substitutes.

        3. Agree. I could not be both mother and father. There is no substitute for a child observing a husband and wife relationship day to day. Of having the influence of both parents in the household. My kids mother visiting them, even though it was daily was just no the same. (I left for work at 5:30, she’d come by at 6 to see them off to school, brought dinner for them once a week, visited occasionally after her work before I would get home to them). That is just not the same as mom and dad both being there every night for dinner, homework, discussions, advising, putting them to bed together.

        4. I was a single parent (of four, the youngest 3) after the death of my second wife. Raising good kids was not that hard. There is no woman I have ever known (and I have 6 sisters, the majority of whom were single mothers most of the time) who was capable of raising children. Men should be given mandatory custody of all children all the time.

  28. This can’t be true. I will show it too my gender studies professor to see what she thinks. The patriarchy is the cause of human suffering.
    Patriarchy cause earthquakes, hailstorms, lice, dog bites, jelly fish stings, shark attacks, computer viruses, cancer, cat scratches, rabies, astreoid impacts, sun spots, smog, fog, car crashes, droughts, floods, lightning and more.

  30. Almost everyone i’ve known that came from a single-mother home had some serious problems.

  31. With those big titties while your children are locked in the bedroom and you entertain your special “friend” on the couch. Oink, Oink!!!

  32. I’m glad the author didn’t completely let us guys off the hook, because after all… it takes two to tango.
    I completely understand that mistakes happen…. but we wouldn’t have “pieces of shit” single moms (referencing the picture at the top of the comments) without pieces of shit dudes busting their load inside their women and then bailing at the first sign of pregnancy.
    If you’re not pulling out (I’ve been doing it for years, and while it doesn’t prevent STD’s, I’m still childless) at least use a condom.
    I’ve met a few dudes that ignore it like “who cares if she gets knocked up, government will take care of her”. Dude, you’re contributing to the problem. There’s NOTHING wrong with getting your nut off, but there’s no reason to risk bringing yet another fatherless kid into this world.
    We sit around bitching about how men need to quit being so lazy, grab life by the balls, and quit sucking up to women. But that’s hard for boys that are raised only by mothers… especially if he has only sisters as siblings. They turn into little “yes-men” before they’ve even had their first girlfriend.

    2. Why are women fucking deadbeats without protection? In the majority of cases the man clearly demonstrates his bad behaviour before the deed. Women are the gatekeepers of the uterus. Do you leave your front door open for anyone to walk in and steal from you? Of course not!!

      1. ‘Why are women fucking deadbeats without protection?’
        In many cases, I’d argue it’s because they grew up in a home with only a mother telling them to ‘take, take, take!”
        I’m dealing with that right now. My youngest niece (only just turned 5) is being raised solely by her mother. The poor niece is already spouting off shit like “I want to be an adult so I can earn money and then do whatever I want!”
        And on the inside I’m thinking “my fucking god, you’re only 5 and the consumerism is already taking hold. You’re already being taught that your value is only as high as the dollar amount in your bank… that there’s no point in trying to become a decent individual with values and standards because the almighty dollar is all that matters”.
        I don’t really wonder why women are dead beats. They only do what they have to in order to get by, like any human. Perfect example is a matriarchal society where the women are the choosers. In such places, women typically let themselves go because they DON’T HAVE to bring anything to the table other than snatch.

    3. I’ve met a few dudes that ignore it like “who cares if she gets knocked up, government will take care of her”.

      It is all fun and games until the DNA test proves these losers to be the fathers and the court-ordered child support gets rolling.

    4. I agree, it takes two to tango. But if all you are doing is pulling out, don’t be surprised if you knock a chick up and/or it burns to take a piss one day.

      1. You’re not wrong, but let me put it to you this way…. everyone of my buddies that has a kid has straight up told me (after I asked) that they knew, or had a hunch, that their kid was on the way. Not because they wanted a kid, not because the mother screwed them over… but because he willingly blew his load INSIDE her… in many cases, more than once.
        I’m definitely not saying pulling out is fool proof… but if you have the will power, it’s a lot less cumbersome and a lot more fun than condoms.
        At any rate… the whole point of the original post, as well as this one, was to basically say:
        “Hey fellas, sex is awesome… so go out there and get yours. But at least TRY not to have kids”… because the stats in that “do you see this piece of shit” picture don’t just magically appear out of no where.
        Some dude, as well as some girl, contributed to them. We can’t just sit and hope the other side is practicing their due diligence. We must, as men, do OUR part, regardless of what we see the other sex doing. You know, lead by example and all.

    5. “I’ve met a few dudes that ignore it like “who cares if she gets knocked up, government will take care of her”.”
      I wonder how fast the trend would reverse if welfare was eliminated. Welfare is worse than heroin.

  33. “If mothers are not at least partially responsible for a child’s bad or criminal behavior, why are they allowed to look after them?”
    Let’s not give the leftists any ideas.

  36. single mothers are also the main cause of the bloated education budget. remember when schools used to have holiday plays? can’t have that anymore because they need to hire remedial reading teachers. remember when schools taught science? can’t do that anymore because we have to hire extra counselors to teach the kids that if someone is crying, they are sad. seriously, the only way to help this is a culture change where the term single mother is basically a synonym for huge waste of fucking resources.

  37. If you want to see the dark side of single mom’s, go on tinder. I died a little inside when a single mom sent me a picture of herself wear a thong. I can’t imagine how the poor son is going to get through life with a mother who is a whore.
    edit: I had an SJW talk to me about the privelage I had living with two parents. What are the two primary causes of single motherhood? careerism women who don’t need no man, and women chasing after deadbeats on EBTs.

  39. I’m looking for a neoractionary/red pill history of feminism, the sexual revolution, and social decay in marriage.
    

It’s be nice if we had a red pill apologetics, quick stats and talking points to make the case against feminism and modern relationships. Or even a “Peoples history” from the alt-right perspective.
    
Any mainstream recommendations on the history of marriage etc that might be helpful would be most welcome.
Thank you.

  40. The thing about sisters being more responsible for a man committing a rape resonates with me deeply, the truth is, if my younger brother grew to be a rapist/abuser/ect I would never stop blaming myself. I’m his older sister, it’s my job to guide him and help him grow into a good man, rather than a pussy who gets walked all over by some bitch or a raping/abusing/ect piece of shit.

Comments are closed.