If a right-winger was to convey to another right-winger that the hijab may be the unseen force of balance to preserve the West from faltering into total degenerate decay, what do you think the common response would be? A common response may be one of the following: “Islam oppresses women and that’s not what America is about!” “How can you side with the liberals like that? Gasp!” Or, perhaps the most heartbreaking of all, “Women deserve the same rights as men!”
Back in my youthful years of developing the brain-eating virus known as liberalism, which has now thankfully been cured, I embraced the dangers of female empowerment, equality, and standing up for ‘what is right’ in America. Women should be able to do as they please as any man—pursue a career, become president if they’re qualified, get a solid career and make bank, etc. On the surface, to the untrained eye, yes, these may seem like reasonable things to desire in your society. And who could possibly be against equality?
The balancing factor
I’ve only recently come into this perspective and, if you’re open-minded enough for just a moment, whether you emotionally agree or not, you may at least understand where I’m coming from. Now, one may be able to observe that there is always this balance – scale, if you will – that comes through Nature and Her line of law and order.
Peace brings war, war brings peace. Peace brings too much freedom, to which develops into more liberal lifestyles, which leads to degeneracy, to which leads to an overall general sweep of societal decay. Thus, that society is weakened. What happens next? When one culture is weakened, in comes another hailing as the Vikings once have. War brings chaos, to which creates law and order by destroying the weakened culture, to which creates stability, to which, overtime is looked at and taken granted for, to which, again, brings peace. And the cycle begins all over again.
That is a huge general sweeping concept to which I’d find holds a strong case. The West has too much freedoms, too many options. Myself, I do not want someone limiting what I’m already able to legally do. However, my intellectual side recognizes the human animal’s need to buck up against things which may literally be for their own benefit. It is natural for man to look his authority figure in the eye and give him the old-fashion middle finger. Again, though, I recognize that sometimes a strong hand must be put over certain people in order to maintain law and order.
Women endanger law and order
I’m sure you’ve heard many Western women talk about how oppressive the hijab is and that America is one of the best countries to be a woman because it grants them more freedom than other countries. Well, that’s the goddamn problem. And that may sound bloody harsh, but there is a serious danger to allowing this imbalance within our society. When women were allowed to vote, back way when in August 18, 1920, it seemed like a progression in American society, sure. Today, however, 2 years shy of a 100 years, we can observe what our society has become.
The men have lost their place of authority in the household, in the education system, in many aspects in the art world such as TV and feature-length film, in the literary world and publishing industry, etc. Both women and men have become whores, divorce rates are high, broken homes craft the child with an unbalanced and unhealthy mind which he then takes out into society furthering its infection, there’s an epidemic of drug abuse and overdose, alcoholism, high abortion rates, suicide, and so on the list continues.
Is this all due to allowing women the right to vote? Of course not. Men held the power, men let it go. They perhaps became too soft, too comfortable, too influenced by female emotion rather than that piss-and-grit brute mindset of their ancestors. So, when I hear females talk about how Islam sucks and the hijab is oppressive, I do find myself wondering if that’s the point to law and order.
Equality does not exist by Nature nor our own damn laws. What happens when we defy Nature when She has clearly given us rules to observe on how things ought to operate in order to keep a society and culture overall healthy, strong, safe and secure? Man has been given the responsibility to own this burden and either adhere to it, or defy it. It is a great responsibility. And, to quote Ben Parker, “With great power comes great responsibility.”
Is the hijab actual female empowerment?
In the whoredom which is the West, allowing a woman to engage in coitus on-screen, while being gang-banged by three different males squirting sperm onto her face—that is what is considered female empowerment in today’s terms. Allowing a woman to get up on-stage while stimulating penetration from behind as she sticks her tongue out like a retarded sheep, that is considered female empowerment. Allowing a potential million young American women to never be shown the life of traditionalism and motherhood as propaganda aims to demonize it, while never showing any of the perhaps positives of it; that is considered female empower so that they may enter the workforce, slave to a corporation as her eggs die off and drown herself in her substance of choice. That is female empowerment. That is freedom.
I do not buy into this slogan that allowing a women to do whatever she pleases is actual female empowerment. Then what is empowerment to the female? There may be a multiple of answers to this inquiry, depending upon whom you ask, but let me give it a go: adhering to the laws of Nature as best you can is the closest you’ll ever get to obtaining empowerment. To adhere to the highest of laws, while being complimented by them, that is how you achieve the highest level of empowerment.
On this planet, if there be any god or goddess which exist, I’d claim to Nature. She is everywhere. In everything you touch, She is there. Touch your clothes, the carpet, a car or fence – it all comes from Her and we are all connected. There are a natural set of rules to best perform the task of law and order. And the Western liberal mentality of the twenty-to-twenty-first century are pissing away at those laws.
Now, some may disagree on what empowerment really means. But I cannot come to siding with the dogmatic view of freedom in terms of allowing ourselves, as a whole, to dwindle away into nothingness as some form of empowerment. That is suicidal. That could give way to suggesting this idea of ’empowerment’ is really non-existent at the end of the day. And, just like ‘freedom,’ if it leads to your destruction over time, is it really empowerment? There’s a lot to unpack there and many could chime in on it, but I’ll keep it simple for now.
Conclusion
If the Muslim women are adhering to Nature, by means of submitting to the dominance of man who, he himself plays his role in adherence to Nature by dominating the submissive, they are in step with law and order. And no matter how many liberals-in-denial preach on about how glorious the freedoms are here in America and how great women have it, it is certainly obvious, at least to myself, that it is ironically the one thing about to kill us off and wipe the slate clean.
If one possesses existential intelligence, then one may be able to see far beyond the horizon. We’re outside with a bunch of people and we see this beautiful array of light in the distance. Some say it is the dawn rising. For me, I get this cold chill running down my spine. While everyone pops out a chair and sits, drinking their vodka and chatting about the place, I decide to grab a ladder, climb to the very top step, and take out my binoculars. While everyone around me sees freedom and equality and a gorgeous sunrise, I see what it really is: the fires of destruction impending.
Read Next: The Orthodox Church Is The Answer To Reviving Christianity In Europe And Saving The West
Economic libertarianism + Christian societal values + Muslim style restrictions on women sounds like a good place. Where do I sign up.
Bonus points if (((they))) can’t join this new country too.
Your exclusions won’t stop with the (((Jooze))). You’d try to exclude Poles, Slavs, Irish, and Italians as well. Fortunately there’s almost no chance people like you will come into any meaningful power. Maladaptives like yourself are dysgenic and will be the ones to fade into extinction. Riddled with infirmity and low IQ through inbreeding, it won’t even be necessary to sweep you away though any kind of force. You will simply dry up and whither. 85-90 IQ whites inhabit small towns across America, while Mexicans move in and run the shops. You won’t even be able to rally those dumb whites into a fighting force (like the KKK tries to) because they’re unmotivated and lazy. No brilliant generals with strategic acumen come from those ranks.
Shut up, rabbi
Burner Prime nails it. And Christian societal values cancel out Muslim style restrictions on women–or anyone/anything. As for the hijab, no wife, daughter or granddaughter of mine would be caught dead with that shit. Deus Vult!
Imagine the disappointment a wolf would have if he knew his descendant was going to be a poodle. That’s how white ancestors feel when they see whites mixing with nonwhites.
“Your exclusions won’t stop with the (((Jooze))). You’d try to exclude Poles, Slavs, Irish, and Italians as well.”
Not a single White nationalist I’ve ever known or communicated with (and I’ve been around for a while) considers the nationalities you mentioned as anything but White. And except for some of the young, idiot skinheads, no grownup WN I’ve ever known fits your stereotype: low IQ, dysgenic, and all the other anti-racist buzzwords you used.
Your screed sounds like nothing more than anti-racist bullshit from an SJW. So what is it, are you a butthurt minority or a self-hating White??
Deus vult my hole,christian women for CENTURIES wore a shawl to cover their head and still do in some countries
The crusades were a power play,no more no less,they sacked christian cities and all,don’t be a fucking sucker your whole fucking life
No, Italians, Irish and eastern euros aren’t slimy pieces of shit who try and trick, distract and deceive everyone else
The ((())) is hated by EVERYONE for a reason
The quicker EVERYONE on earth realizes this the better
Natty S. There are over 30 different races of wolf. Not saying that race mixing is a good idea, especially the mudshark variety. I see too many disturbed women (invariably single) with little zebras tagging along. At least with white-Hispanic (talking Mexican and CA here) race mixing, you’ll wind up with people who are mostly European with some Native American.
I got an idea! What if men started wearing burqas? Some kinda badass ninja looking scare the living shit out of everybody in sight hood. “Why are you wearing that?” – “It’s part of my religion muthafucka WACHAW!” Front snap kick to the nose followed up with a Bill Superfoot Wallace roundhouse kick to the lateral bicuspids, which go flying like piano keys across the floor. Maybe throw in a flying dropkick! That would be sweeeeet!
https://media.giphy.com/media/f9K6x9Ft0L3OM/giphy.gif
Then again. Maybe not.
Sounds like the situation in A Handmaid’s Tale. Hopefully it won’t be as boring as trying to watch an episode. Fuck I hate that show.
Titus 2: “But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine:
2 That the aged men be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, in patience.
3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;
4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.”
Titus 2 makes it crystal clear to all people who profess to be Christians that feminists are blasphemers. There is no way around it. If a church going woman is not sober, does not love her husband or her children, not discreet, not chaste, not homekeepers, not good, or not obedient to their own husbands, then they are blasphemers. It’s as if they are cursing God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. I think most Christian women in other countries outside the West understand this and have no problem with it, but it’s time for “Christian” women in the West to decide which side of eternity they will be committed to. Feminism is demonic. It’s a spiritual movement that comes from Hell. As Jesus explained, just look at the fruits of this movement to know where it comes from: divorce, abortion, miserable, unhappy women, children, and men.
Iran, Syria, Iraq….or any other camel shagging, sand shithole you can find. Airport —————>
Dress light, it’s warm.
I hear Yemen is nice this time of year. A lot going on, too.
Have fun seeing all the degeneracy spread in your country. Islam actually preserves your culture and traditions. The goat camel shagging sand boisss have always been right you homo lover.
Hijabs are backward and medieval. Period.
Something similar was *the* thing to wear during the Dark and Middle Ages. You see a vestige of it with the traditional Nun’s Habit. That was when the focus of everyday life was on the hereafter, literacy was pretty much nonexistent, theocracy and autocracy ruled the day, superstition ran rampant, material and intellectual progress was nil, and…. Well, you get the idea.
Thank God for the Plagues of the 14th Century and the resultant Renaissance, that slowly did away with all that crap, including the notion that, somehow, the sight of a woman’s hair would somehow drive men to frenzies of lust and distract them away from the contemplation of the Divine.*
Whoever wrote this article would doubtless be happiest in some Middle East shithole. But I very much doubt his idea of a Burka-ridden theocratic paradise would suit the rest of us, probably the reason that, if you’re reading this, you’re not living in, say, Iran.
Just a thought.
VicB3
*If that last part sounds a bit like something straight out of Radical and backward looking Islam, you’re right. All those Jihadists/Salafis a nothing but a bunch of scared old men and ignorant, callow and insecure (inbred and low IQ) little boys.
Id prefer a society where the women don’t act like rutting chimpanzees and dress outside of the bedroom like wh0res. Too much to ask to have a hallway polite society when debauchery is more “fun”. But then again I understand why it is that those who indicate a preference for a polite public society are mocked for wanting something with a little self discipline and self restraint versus the anything goes perversion that is todays West. Watch the morons come out to call me out and say I am in support of Sharia, which I am not at all.
Personal responsibility, self discipline and self restraint. Yes, indeed too much to ask for.
Edgar Tru should be wearing a hijab
Christianity is dying in the west. Islam is your salvation.. literally.
This article does a good job summing up how we got here, and how enforcing restrictions on women’s hypergamous impulses is key to a more stable civilization. If people’s behaviors are unchecked, when they don’t recognize any boundaries, you end up with Michael Jackson and Harvey Weinstein.
I wish it went on to explain how much of the time, the left actually embraces the “right” to wear the hijab, especially whenever some Scandinavian country decides to “ban the burka”. Perhaps this is where the right could leverage the left’s hypocrisy. Join in the chorus, promote and enforce the hijab – first allow it among Muslims, then encourage and eventually enforce it upon the thots and sluts through pier pressure (of which whamens are powerless) and social pressure. Might just work.
If people’s incomes/power are unchecked, when they don’t recognize any boundaries, you end up with Michael Jackson and Harvey Weinstein. Fixed it. Depraved celebrities and predatory, casting-couch producers date back to antiquity–or at least back to Fatty Arbuckle.
The problem with you is this—
Any argument you make, even if 100% valid is *totally* invalidated by your anti-white animus. Shitting on ‘low IQ deplorables’ and redneck WNs, etc. etc. you are a shitlib shill by any other name. So fuck off back to HuffPo w/ the rest of your kind.
Ya feel me brah? Not. Welcome.
I agree. Burner Prime is up to no good here.
APEX: unless you’re a moderator or Roosh I don’t GAF if you welcome me or not. You act like you own this forum, what a colossal joke. And it isn’t about me anyway. I bring cold hard red-pill truth bombs, that’s all. It’s not news that the White Nationalists have thrown Roosh under the bus on threads in the past. So why are you here? Roosh made it crystal clear no White Nationalists doing Nazi salutes, false-flagging his meet-up.
BIG SHON:
“Not a single White nationalist I’ve ever known or communicated with (and I’ve been around for a while) considers the nationalities you mentioned as anything but White.” You have not read Vox Day or Heartiste then. Both of them consider Irish and Italians degenerate. “Been around a while” you say?
Unless Roosh tells me to take off, I’m here to stay. Ya feel me bruh?
BP: I’ve been in the game since the 90s. So yeah, been around a while.
So you admit to lurking on Vox Day and Heartiste websites? Yet you are adamantly anti-Whte Nationalism. Why would you be looking at those sites, then? Can’t wait to hear the reason. I’m with the poster who said you are up to no good here, and are a POS visiting sites where you have no business and trying to derail the conversations away from certain topics. Or just troll.
You and Peter Frazer.
You have two choices in life: You can stay single and be miserable, or get married and wish you were dead.
3rd choice,
Move out of the white world and have a perfectly nice life with a non-white wife half your age, lots of children and plenty of young pussy on the side.
Gas yourself, degenerate.
Wank to porn in mommy’s basement, incel.
if you can get past her smell.
Great article. I have long thought about the virtues of having women’s hair covered, and more in general recovering controls on their sexuality. They claim it’s their freedom to walk around dressing as they please, but where lays the freedom of men to walk around without being sexually stimulated continuosly? The reason religions (christianity too) came up with the idea of the veil was not to submit women, but to prevent them from being the object of too much attention coming from men. In today’s world, where the state severely controls and punushes the sexual impulses of men, the veil would be a type of tax on the beauty/sexuality of women. And this is exactly what this society needs! I’d like to refer here to an old RoK article “Why Sexual Socialism in America would improve the Lives of Men”. Look it up. More ideas to regain control and stop the degeneracy.
All of the monotheistic religions had women cover their heads.
Christianity (as contrasted with modern liberal churchianity) teaches which women to cover their heads.
https://www.headcoveringmovement.com
Unlike Islam, Christianity is true. The God of the Bible is the One true God. Judaism rejects the Son of God, and is thus cut off from redemption.
No point in talking to imbeciles. They are actually promoting Islamic ideas as a panacea for society !!
@ Francesc – the veil reducing a woman’s visibility is only a small part of the function of covering up her head. It’s really about covering and containing her head hairs which act as ANTENNAE which transmit a hypergamous female brainwave static field and I touched on this in a previous comment but I’ll recap:
The ‘beekeeper suit’ is one of Alex Jones’ favorite points in his rants against islamic refugee hoards saying “Do we want our women in beekeper suits?” It’s kind of rediculous really, thinking whites would need beekeeper suits to tame and re-domesticate the feral white women because white men controlled their women for millennia without beekeeper suits.
The beekeeper suit is for semitic desert Arab women and the suit has a dual purpose. The cloth covering is like a tarp or cover for your valuable property, kind of like a fitted cover for your mercruiser boat or for your vette. The beekeeper covering keeps the women from being bombarded by UV radiation, thereby preventing premature skin aging and the head covering also keeps their facial hairs and cranial head hairs degaussed and shielded so they don’t leak and transpond female brainwave ejecta.
Yes did you know that the head hair follicles act as antennae and transponder rods? They can send signals like an insect’s antennae and hairs can also sense invisible and inaudiable information and static fields like a cat’s whiskers. They’re ANTENNAS dammitt.
Powerful patriarch men in history and lucid men have all had large power beards. Psychics like Kenny Kingston had a large electrostatically charged bush of hair that looked like a fro. Einstein had one too.
In times of patriarchy, THE MEN all peacocked their (antennae) hair while the women had their scalp under wraps. Colonial America was as far from feminism as any white society in history and you could marry a post pubescent 13yo menstruating girl for dowry and turn around and breed her like a barnyard sow. Now THAT’S patriarchy on a king sized cracker brah. And notice how during this colonial time men in political power all had big power beards and peacocking wigs while the women had a tight dutch cap from ear to ear – not a female hair to be seen outside the bedroom. So no, absolutely no beekeper suits are needed by the whites to keep their females in check. Just keep her head hair down spit flat and you control her better than a circumcized clown doing anal on her.
SO, if a person objects to feminism or is anti-feminist, then this premise that they are pro Islam is idiotic. And fighting feminism doesn’t turn you into a semite brown clown either.
Feminism isn’t an olive/brown skinned semitic issue. It’s a MAN’S issue. Fighting and slamming a trash can lid on feminism is something any race and any civilization has to do, that is, if that race/civilization wishes to remain on the cutting edge, defensable and not winding up orphaned and becoming a curtodial parcel under some competing power. A feminized civilization that falls under BlTCH RULE gets absorbed or annexed or pillaged by their neighbors.
No, controlling your women is not just for brown/olive towelheads and towelheads do not posess exclusive licence to patriarchy. ALL BRAHS of all races have a God given right to be patriarchs and sieze dominion over your tribeswomen. SIEZE that right and it be yours. Refuse it and swallow your balls chump. And watch your reproductivity be choked to unsustainable levels while you cuck and forefit your natural offspring in lieu of pets and Haitian orphans.
YOU MUST control your women to survive as a member of the human species. We are a patriarchal species. Only the insect bee or ant species is matriarchal with a big queen B egg sack that controls lesser and expendable worker insects.
Every race of human has their own special way to control their women. A white man would look silly with a towel on his head and praying to Mecca as a solution to controlling his white women. That would be like a white guy dressing like a wigger and thinking it would improve his basketball game or that it would increase his ability to spit rapping rhymes. THERE IS a way for the white man to control his women and we did for millennia. Everyone must control their women each in their own special way.
But for all mankind, the women’s hair must go DOWN or your culture and bloodline, everything gets flushed down the toilet.
well said.
Well put, McGoo. You’re a breath of fresh air. And like I said on an earlier, similar post, the patriarchy began to crumble in the mid-1960s with the advent of women’s bouffant and beehive hairdos. Those things put out feminizing signals like a 50 kilowatt radio tower!
Re: hair as antennae… lots of people think it sounds crazy, but I believe it. I started covering my head/hair pretty much at all times a couple of years ago, and the shift of focus from outward to inward was immediate and noticeable. Initially it was to cover a bad haircut, but has become something of a religious practice for me, although I have no formal religious affiliation. I think many women would benefit from it.
No, hijab cannot “save” women. But he can save the beauty of western towns when all the ugly female landwhales and tattoo shags disappear!
false premise. muslim women are all ugly, smelly and gross. white fatties rank above them in the thotaucracy.
The hijab is empowering for women since it allows the one wearing it to be judged based on her talent, value, personality, principles, & worth instead of her physical appearance. But today’s whores will never go for it because they themselves only judge themselves on how attractive they are to men. It might be surprising to some, but the large majority of women, regardless of their rating on a 1-10 scale, have incredibly low self-esteem & confidence, even in this feminist society (which is why their social media use is so abundant). A hijab would take away the only thing that gives meaning to their sad lives.
“The hijab is empowering for women since it allows the one wearing it to be judged based on her talent, value, personality, principles, & worth instead of her physical appearance.”
Well said, Ahmed. Has your application to join ISIS been accepted yet?
Get in an over Herbie schwarz
The world hates you and has always hated you
They are waking up to your garbage
oven*
“Can the Hijab save women?” Just not from themselves. taking away their smart phones, definitely.
“If a right-winger was to convey to another right-winger that the hijab may be the unseen force of balance to preserve the West from faltering into total degenerate decay, what do you think the common response would be? ”
You’re an idiot. Next question.
“Just not from themselves. taking away their smart phones, definitely.”
Strange considering that your phone is always in your right hand. I would start with focusing on reducing your compulsion for self-affirmation.
Your projection is disingenuous and dishonest. Enough said.
Neal, why do I have a bad feeling that this “Allyn71” is some dude named Allen who transgendered and became “Allyn.” Either that or it’s a chick.
@ BlueEyedDevil. It’s a SJW feminist piece of shit. You can tell by its faux intellectual comment that attributes to a comment I never made setting up its ad hominem attack then assumes wrongly that I’m like itself, narcissistic with my phone attached to my right hand. That thing set up its own straw man and attempts to beat me down with it. Yes, it’s a pure mentally ill estrogen bomb. A popcorn fart is more successful and threatening.
You aren’t fit to tie Neal’s shoes. He was a soldier for quite some years, and did not go into the easy specialties. He is part of my band of brothers.
“Strange considering that your phone is always in your right hand. I would start with focusing on reducing your compulsion for self-affirmation”
100% accurate.
Is that you, Allyn71? Or just a different person who doesn’t belong here?
that but cuck western culture like say denmark and france want to ban it….aggressive white knights, white nationalists are blue pilled as shit
Radical feminists are red pilled then, seeing how they are also against the sexualization of women and against slutty behavior. On top of it all, they hate trannies.
In the not so distant future, every smart phones on earth will be eroding away down in a landfill.
I’ve often wished that I could wear a hijab or a nun’s habit or somesuch similar thing without drawing undue attention to myself… since the whole appeal of it in the first place is that I basically want to hide under it. I’m currently considering a long hooded cloak. Similar principle without the non-applicable religious associations.
But is that actually what men want? How many would actually be cool living in, investing in, committing to, helping build a culture where you don’t get to test drive, don’t even get to see a woman’s body before marrying her? Where you don’t get to go out and look at bare arms, legs, cleavage, hair, etc?
There’s often a huge disparity between the qualities men say they want in a woman, and what they actually go for. Ask men for a list of things they consider necessary for a woman to be considered properly feminine and attractive, and you’ll get a lot of men talking about: high heels, short/figure-hugging dresses/skirts, long hair fully on display, makeup, painted nails, etc.
I’m all for modest dress, partly because when I dress modestly, men basically don’t talk to me. I like it just fine that way now because I’m not on the market, but as a young single woman it was frustrating. Even at church and church activities where a certain level of modesty was strictly enforced, the girls who dressed and acted as much like whores as they could get away with were rewarded with a disproportionate amount of male attention – and I see the same thing everywhere. Men say they want modest, traditional, sexually inexperienced women – but they want them to look and act like whores. And they want them to come pre-packaged that way.
“you’ll get a lot of men talking about: high heels, short/figure-hugging dresses/skirts, long hair fully on display, makeup, painted nails, etc.”
I believe that only low-tier men would say they want a woman who wears high heels, tight dresses, makeup and fake/painted nails.
When I picture such a woman, I think of a prostitute. And what kind of man is attracted to such a woman? A worthless one.
Agreed. The issue I see is that “low-tier” describes most people and always will. It’s not just women who need to have their behavior controlled, it’s most of the general population, male and female.
Is that realistically achievable?
I’ve always been of the mind that trying to change anything for the better from the top-down isn’t going to work, because the majority of the existing population will never be amenable. They’re a lost cause.
I suspect that the majority of society will always be degenerate. I think the best we can hope to do is to start building villages again and creating communities centered around common values and the preservation thereof. Moral society needs to be grown from the ground up. And I think part of preserving it is to maintain a way of life that offers little or no incentive for folks who don’t really care about the values/ideology and are just keen to exploit the economy.
The Amish, for example, don’t seem to have much of an issue with people joining their ranks and diluting/destroying their culture from the inside, because their way of life isn’t attractive to most people. It’s hard. Folks aren’t signing up for the perks – they opt in because they’re willing to work hard and forego a lot of niceties to live in a community that upholds the standards they adhere to.
“I believe that only low-tier men would say they want a woman who wears high heels, tight dresses, makeup and fake/painted nails.”
You do realize, Cuckslayer, that your virtue signaling completely emasculates the fine men who post here, right?
Funny that no man has ever planned a slutwalk and only gay men and women plan fashion shows so who is it really that truly objectifies women as tasteless crass sluts. Just gay men that act like women and vagina owners themselves are to blame. And still they go projecting that on to men that they hate.
All men are attracted to a woman like that. Men love sluts. They might not consider her marriage material, but ya can’t trick yo’ dick.
I wouldn’t say that men “love sluts” so much as they submit to having their base urges thoroughly manipulated by them, often to disastrous ends. But, you know, potato poTAHto.
Point being: many men advocate for chaste femininity with words, but pour vast amounts of time, energy, and money into blatantly, openly promoting and supporting immodesty, promiscuity, and prostitution.
… and then bemoan the fact that none of the sluts they bang magically transform into stable, loving, lasting relationships. They complain about not being able to find wife-quality women when their own visual criteria effectively make the majority of those women invisible to them.
I don’t think the blame can be pinned on men or women, but since it’s so often touted that men are the leaders and women are the followers – by NATURE – is it any surprise that men buying into wholesale slut-worship would lead to more women being sluts and whores?
In a world were women are property and marriages are arranged by their parents, nobody needs to see the product. 10 posts from a silly woman about choice, when you are discussing situations where there is no choice and no consent. In the Arab world, your looks don’t matter, you are just a walking womb to produce children for your husband. Plenty of blonde Instagram port-a-potties for your husband to buy for entertainment
where not were
Social conditioning is why some men care about high heels , etc.
I would prefer a naturally beautiful woman (without make up) with an athletic body. She could be wearing a potato sack.
I’d be leery of any woman in a potato sack dress. They might look all cute and innocent, but it usually says right on there “I da ho.”
Dude, what do u want? A woman in a black ninja outfit? What’s wrong with you people.
Pick up a whore in high heels, get her drunk, empty your sack and move on. For God sake don’t promote the ninja outfit unless you are Isis
No, only men can save women from their irresponsibility. That and teach people fashion, people dont know how to dress nowadays.
That’s what it really boils down to: Most people just dress like crap.
American, male or female, tend to be awful dressers.
Men who have been to muslim countries know dating local women there is more difficult than in “the west” but hardly impossible.
There is an estimate of 8 million celibate women in Morocco alone. And Morocco is a hub for sex tourism.
Muslim men all dream to move to europe to live on wellfare and commit various crimes, while many muslim women are not against marrying a foreigner who will not torture them and make good providers.
It’s quite telling about how derelict muslim societies are, and have always been, even when compared to utterly decadent West. No rule of law, the wealthiest always get away, victims are prosecuted, not the perpetrators. No middle-class, hence no stability.
Local men are mostly unable to interact with women, making them frustrated and prone to resort to “alternative” sexualities, like homosexuality and bestiality.
Hardly what nature intended. Not to mention the overwhelming influence of the religion, which will never be reformed because supposedly perfect, while christianity itself, over 2000 years, adapted to fit the peoples it intended to convert rules.
There are no aspects of the muhammadan cult which can be redeeming for other countries, western europe is the clear proof of that, hosting millions of muslims who don’t work and commit most of the crimes. Oddly, for a patriarchal society, it is the females who work and study among the muslim populations, males being too dim-witted and violent.
Thank you. The idea that muzzie men are oh so marvelous and in control is a ridiculous idea. Most are like women themselves. I like that you mention how eager they are to get to the West and get on welfare and benefits.
Three men were trying out for the FBI.
The testing agent approached the three men with a gun. He pointed to a door and said, “We have all your wives in that room over there. For you to make it into the FBI, you must each take this gun and shoot your wife.”
The first man took the gun, walked boldly into the room, and shut the door. The others listened for gunshots, but heard nothing. A while later, the man came out of the room, crying, “I can’t shoot my wife. I love her!”
The second man took the gun, walked boldly into the room, and shut the door behind him. The others again listened for gunshots, but again heard only silence. The man came out, bawling, and said, “I can’t shoot my wife! She cooks so well, and I love her so much!”
The third man said, “Gimme the danged gun.” He snatched the weapon, and marched in the room. It took no time at all to hear: BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!
That was followed by all sorts of banging noise, screams, and then finally cold silence.
The man emerged from the room, sweating profusely, and barked, “You didn’t tell me the gun was loaded with blanks! So I had to beat her to death with a chair.”
I’d like to see you spreading the hijab ideas in Hungary
Don’t think the Russians (outside of Chechnya) would be too pleased either.
Russian women traditionally wear a shawl to cover their heads.
maybe in deep province
But don’t get stoned for not wearing it.
“I’m sure you’ve heard many Western women talk about how oppressive the hijab is”
Yeah, but have anyone heard a left-wing woman saying this?
No. Because these sows run around wanting “wear a hijab day” at work. I counter with “get rid of the hijab and wear a Christian cross day.” These feral sows don’t realize that if muzzies take over they won’t be working and certainly won’t be yapping their mouths off.
Only women could think of something so stupid as wear a hijab day without realizing how women are raped, tortured and killed throughout the world in muzzie countries. Just doesn’t occur to these fatbit wearing moonbats.
Men have to find their balls and put women in their place, otherwise nothing will work. As long as women have so called rights, like voting then nothing will change.
Traditionally, men had no right to vote either, most men had no right to get educated or own property. Be careful what you wish for.
Excellent article my friend,keep them coming. I like a man that thinks outside the box.
This makes a nice change from roosh moisturizing his penis with coconut oil for days after sex.Can’t believe that statement is actually true !!!
The Crusades worked to simply reclaim land stolen violently by Muslims.
As a j ew you should know this.
All of N Africa And the Middle East was once Christian.
Thinking about Roosh’s penis, (((Gerard))) ?
Roosh is a, uh, rare bird.
Can we get a video of that?
I agree with the article. The people should recall that Christian women covered their heads too. This is not an issue of some “Muslim style restrictions” but sanity versus ignorance and degeneracy.
Christian women covered their heads AFTER they were married. All women covered their heads going into church and men took off their hats when entering the House of The Lord. When I was a kid, we wouldn’t dream of going into church without our heads covered. If you got stuck a kleenix and hair pin would do.
That was a Catholic thing. Pre Vatican II. And only during mass. After mass, the hair doilies came off.
I have seen some videos of Troy Francis and came to give some advice for free. Troy, it’s really a pain to watch you now, and many commented in other posts about your unluck in the genetic lottery, but I believe you have a good skull shape and potential, so if you work on the following things I believe you can add maybe 3 points to your SVM:
1. Remove these 2 fucking warts.
2. Do something about your disgusting teeth, specially the under frontal ones.
3. Get tanned.
4. Throw away these ridiculous sunglasses. They are ugly and too big for your gracile face.
5. Do some push-ups etc.
6. Shave.
7. Smile more, not a full smile (specially because the bad teeth) but you are too severe in your videos, like a insecure school supervisor or something alike.
Extra. It’s normal to get older, but these 2 marks aroud you mouth, they really don’t look good. Maybe you can do something about it, not surgery, but some exercises maybe.
Good luck.
Mark my words:
In 2020 the media and feminist narrative will speak of the 100th anniversary and briefly pat themselves on the back for how far they’ve come, but in the next breathe be insulted that it was “only 100 years ago, which speaks to how awful America is and how much further we need to go because of ( frivolous x, y, z issues).”
The hijab or burka is just a cover for thottery for muslim women. Feminism is strong in the middle east and hypergamy is stronger than the west. If you are not born in a high class rich family you are out of luck in the middle east as a guy.
Islam doesn’t have some kind of monopoly on female head coverings. Traditionally Christian women covered their heads, married women in particular.
Rule No1 : don’t say “hijab” (therefore helping to popularize a goatfucker term in english language, but “Moslem headscarf”.
Indeed. The national propaganda networks have been using “habub” instead of “sandstorm” when reporting about Southwestern deserts.
It’s one thing to use a foreign word for something for which your language has no exact term, but another to substitute it for something that makes sense in English.
I see “too much freedom” as meaning lack of self-discipline plus psychopathic self-centeredness.
Exactly.
Fuck Muslims. I know first hand what their countries look like and I don’t need any of their advice.
Right on!!! If it’s sooooo great why are these countries such shitholes. Why are they so eager to get over to the white man’s world?
Yup. I think whoever wrote this article moonlights as a an editor at Inspire magazine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inspire_(magazine)
As america is a christian nation, no, a rag on a woman’s head will not save western women. A woman wearing a rag is a sign of submission to islam and a loss for christianity. Do mormons force their women to wear a raghead? No. I would only go as far as agreeing with what Amish Women wear, where the hair is still visible. What we CAN do is promote modesty in a christian manner as time of old.
Not in public, but women wear veils in Mormon temple ceremonies. Head coverings, as many have pointed out, both pre-date and still exist outside of Islam. The hijab specifically, well… I wouldn’t want to look like a Muslim woman. But covering the head/hair is absolutely an example of Christian modesty, even if the practice has been widely abandoned outside of specific ceremonies.
I take note that the slim, eye glassed muzzie gal you show is far from what I see in real life. Most muzzie women are land whales sweating under black polyester and looking ugly with dark bags under their eyes. Most need to cover their head AND faces because they are just plain ugly. Very few really good looking ones and the slim ones are young and of non-breeding age.
Keeps away the flies, too.
reminder that the big American corpos highly encouraged feminism and its societal back-breaking consequences, all in the name of the dollar $$$$$$$$$$$
To claim there is too much freedom is so effin stupid.
If the author loves Saracens so much he should move to Mecca
Why you mad? Cuz he said the right thing?
Well said! The right wingers in the west need to know Islam is their only salvation. It’s the only religion that have not been changed. Abominations such as homosexuality, feminism, abortion, transgenderism is on the rise. Christianity has failed at preserving western values. Islam amplifies traditions and cultural values.
Many right wingers throughout history admired Islam and Muslims for their masculinity and for their roles in both inside and outside their homes. Unlike the west where cuckolds keep on breeding like insects. Islam urges men to become Alphas and masculine. Even cuckoldry can make you go to hell.
That’s how serious we are and I’m grateful for that. Christianity is dying. The j00ws are controlling the politics of the west. And Islam is standing.. unchangeable. Allahu Akbar w La Ilaha illa Allah, Mohammad Rasulullah
…aaaaaand it still won’t
TAKE AWAY HER RIGHT TO VOTE!!!!
so civilization still gets to slowly die.
Hijabs are ugly and stupid looking.