The 9th of November 2016 was a great day. We will remember it as well as our parents remember the first moon landing in July 1969 or the fall of the Berlin wall. Liberal mainstream media—almost a pleonasm—are either stunned or agitating. Some of these crybullies clamour to themselves how “fearful” they are, lament on the “destruction of the West”—a curious expression as it seldom appears under leftist pens—or have difficulties to acknowledge that the man they have despised and defamed every day for months will be the 45th President of the United States.
Outside the US, The Donald’s victory is creating waves, too. So many liberals allegedly connected to the Canadian Immigration website to crash it. In France, the bourgeois bohemians who work in the media, academia and everything that constitutes the big left establishment do the same posturing than their American counterparts, whereas the petits blancs (impoverished, disenfranchised whites) and local “righters” rejoice.
In Brazil, where your humble servant lives, the official media is making some tedious comments that deliver a flabby criticism. Local leftist talking heads condemn the “white protestants” and reality shows in a very cliché posturing that mixes anti-white prejudice with a critique of capitalism, whereas some new traditionalists, among whom some have been avid readers and makers of Alt-Right content, are grateful.
This is our victory.
Feels good, man
A pro-Pepe Facebook group has had a substantive discussion about where a red-pilled foreigner considering moving to the US after the Donald won should go. To make a long story short, some have advised potential newcomers to go live in the Midwest, in Texas as long as one stays away from Houston or Dallas, in Wyoming for the gun rights, in Pennsylvania excluding Philadelphia and the urban areas, close to the Appalachian mountains if one enjoys outdoors, while staying away from Illinois. Most of those who participated were whites, but I have spotted some Latino and Arab names. Some made jokes on these names but no fuss.
And here the following question arises. What defines us? Liberals have been shrieking about “xenophobia” or “racism” all the time. Yet, strictly national boundaries are much less relevant than before, even for us, even when we all rejoiced about Trump’s promise to make a wall. All over the world we are rejoicing around the GOP candidate’s victory.
American “Trumpists” undoubtedly feel closer to non-Americans who have been dissenting from the NWO on the Internet and wanted the Donald to pass than to American libtards. A lot of us are OK with having non-whites around: we don’t pander to arrogant, aggressive anti-whites, but that does not mean we would have to be “racists” as the liberal caricature wants us to be. To cut in more personally, I know of no genuine red-pilled or Alt-Righter who would have rejected me as a frog, although I remember some stars and stripes cucks blaming me for daring to speak about American politics without owning a US passport.
The frog is green after all
So, once again, what defines us? Why are we a “we”? Race plays a role for sure. We struggle to keep the white people from getting dissolved into the acid bath of wide-scale miscegenation and dispossession. We want a right to solidarity based at least partly on race, i.e. on lineage and identity, just like all the pseudo-minority groups out there. We fight the double standard that allows them to be communitarian, tribalistic, nepotistic, without being ever responsible of what they do, whereas we are supposed to keep our heads down and be taught everything by liberal social engineers in a world where we would have no freedom, no future, no dignity.
But even then, there have been Blacks, Latinos, and many women who participated into bringing The Donald to the White House. I have a race-mixed friend who supported Trump all along. This is not to say “I’m not a racist!,” afraid cuckservative-style, but to show there are some and we know it firsthand.
It is no mystery why most of us are white: we are united around a civilization that was primarily built by people of European descent. But there is more, too.
And this “more” that, I think, defines and binds us; this “more” is shared awareness.
On the periphery of the System centers, we managed to grow and gather
We are all aware, broadly speaking, of the same phenomena and trends. We have witnessed the break-up of families and harmonious relationships between men and women. We have been faced with the untold prohibition to make the least critic of feminism, “minority groups” aggressive identitarianism, and with the pervasive omnipresence of these leftist norms commonly referred to as political correctness. We have seen neoliberalism allowing a handful of careless, irresponsible assholes sending the jobs overseas, importing third-world immigration, then force us into a life of chronic unemployment or endless struggles against other low-wage individuals for a small place under the sun.
We saw how conservatism was a sham that never faced the genuine problems. We witnessed societies crumble, conflictual “minoritarian” group identities being crafted by the likes of Soros, and the meritorious worker or professional—whatever his race—getting exploited to the benefit of the lower and upper parasites. We saw the liberal establishment using various social categories like pawns to create horizontal struggles and depopulation.
Of course, some disagreements can be found on this or that particular issue, but we all see the same devastated landscape in lieu of the brilliant civilization the West once was.
And here is the major fault line. The leftists deny or value—they often go from the former to the latter—the replacement of native European population, the aggressive and tribalistic stance of “minority groups” towards the silent majority, the forced inclusion of individuals into sick identity politics games, the perpetual hostility and institutionalized prejudice against whites and males… Either the leftists utterly deny what we are aware of, for example when they say that whites are not under replacement, or they demonize it as a remnant of some “privilege” or “prejudice.”
All their talk about “oppressed minorities” dissimulates the very real disenfranchisement of the white majority, of non-white meritorious and integrated Westerners, and serves to deny us from our rights to public empathy, to dignity, or to even basically survive in a world of our own. They work on language and representations because their job consists in manipulating these, thus brainwashing us into seeing the world through their lenses and denying the legitimacy of any other vision.
The importance of shared awareness explains why we united on the Internet. A lot of us were closet nationalists years ago, and still are. We could not, and often still cannot, be nationalists in public, or we would have been excluded from normal social life by the local leftists and cowards. Leftist hegemony was and is still real in the mainstream. You know hegemony when you see it and spend countless hours thinking about how you can thrive even when living under it.
In the mid-2000, I found out about the information website Fdesouche (“Native French”) quote. By the standards of today, this news aggregator seems hardly interesting: it mostly collates pieces written by others. But then, it was fantastic. Here I could recognize what I already felt about the world—that something was wrong with all these non-whites thugs holding the streets and getting lavish promotion when they bragged about it. It was all concentrated before my eyes, and others were talking about what they went through daily as well. At least, others felt and saw the same as I did! I was not crazy, not bound to a life of unauthenticity or forlorn solitude among the almighty left. We were assembling. And we were on the Internet.
“Fdesouche.com—The website they want to keep you from visiting”
As most of us found ourselves under attack from non-native Frenchmen, and knowing intuitively that identity goes deeper than the fleeting winds today called culture, we often despised immigration in general. But eventually things changed, thanks to Alain Soral, mostly, who emphasized how racial struggle was leading to sterile battles among disenfranchised people while letting the truly powerful off the hook. Mathias Cardet, a black journalist who worked with Soral, showed how gangsta-rap culture was injected and nurtured among non-whites by powerful interests.
After all, one can be black or Arab and wanting to live in peace as a free individual, not as an identity politics pawn who spends his life attacking another social category.
Being pro-white, pro-masculinity and pro-tradition does not require being white: I often felt closer from Muslims with good intentions, i.e. Muslims who were genuine believers and not rancorous people using Islam as a mask for anti-white tribalism, than from white liberals. The Muslims would not share my blood, but they would share some of my awareness and yearning for Tradition, two things that white liberals eagerly reject.
“Faith front, warriors’ alliance against common foes”
The Internet is immaterial. It is, basically, a network where information flows. Awareness, and the will to spread it, are immaterial as well. This is why we could meet and act on the Internet. After all, the Alt Right and manosphere have been sharing ideas, media contents, memes, advises—and only later proceeded to meetups, panicking the totalitarian liberals in the process.
Trump’s victory is a major one. Regardless of what The Donald will actually do, it is an event of considerable historical magnitude. But it is only the beginning—make no mistake about that. The libtards’ establishment still holds loads of money, of institutions, of cultural territory. It has started to crumble and leak, yet it is still there.
Major battles are waiting ahead. We have to further our awareness, make thorough research on every aspect of leftism, and develop more proper cultural references.
Always remember the libtards never cared one second about us. They would have let us die off, alone, poor, childless, traumatized and demonized, had we not chosen to follow the path of the red pill.
America is a first-tier power, but it is still a battlefield among others. Wherever we are, it is time to thicken our mutual relationships and cooperate more closely. It is a battle, not between nationals and foreigners, but between workers and parasites, between those who feel the void and wrongness in the rotten core of postmodernity and those who dwell in the last liberal trend, between the realists who want freedom and responsibility in a healthy world of values and cultures against those who ravel in blue pill, media bullshit, complacency, parasitism and cucking for the empire of nothing.
We are the future. It doesn’t matter where we are. We are those with true awareness, those with genuine and healthy values, those who struggled to hone their abilities, and most importantly those who actually deserve to inherit the Western world. So, save it and conquer it, country after country, institution after institution, outlet after outlet—or there will be nothing left.
Read Next: You Are Either A Globalist Or A Nationalist
“Always remember the libtards never cared one second about us.”
THIS. Don’t forget this when they start kissing up to us, pretending that they supported us all along: media shills like Jon Liebowitz Stewart, CNN, ESPN, etc.They did everything in their power to sabotage the traditional edifice of America.
Don’t think for a minute that they will not stick the knife in our backs if they have the chance again.
The NeverTrump Republicans spent the better part of a year lying about us, too.
Now Google, Facebook, et al. are cracking down on “fake news” – theoretically, given their political leanings, that means they’ll follow Wikipedia in rejecting any sources they don’t personally approve of. Heck, they’ll probably try to shut out live coverage from bystanders as well, just to keep their narrative going (remember that they refused to show how big Trump’s rallies were, even though there were free images and videos to use online).
We must give no quarter, because they have never shown us mercy. GamerGate and our coverage of the various rape hoaxes broke the idea that media outlets were inherently trustworthy. “Safe Spaces” broke the idea that colleges were anything more than expensive adult daycare centers. Trump’s election broke the idea that media had the vaguest idea what the hell is going on in the world. And now that the lines are broken, we finally have a chance to take them down.
Trump was only the first campaign. We have a long Reconquista ahead of us.
Obama said there was a rise of “fake news” which allowed Trump to ascend.
So a 19 trillion debt is fake? And transvestite bathrooms? And BLM riots?
What a disappointment he turned out to be.
This ‘fake news’ thing is the same as “conspiracy theory”. It’s a quick way to dismiss any analysis of facts that doesn’t agree with them or facts they don’t want known as being invalid. It’s to tell people who not to listen to. Another social trick.
Exactly why the founding fathers believed in freedom of the press. “Fact” “checking” (it deserves the double quotes) translates directly to “shut up or we’ll hurt you”.
Obama was the first Affirmative Action president. I was sure of him being a failure in the end as I got the vibe that too many people voted him… sorry WORSHIPPED him only for being black. Here, in Greece, when he was to be ellected many people were saying that we will see a white day (it is an idiom that means a good day) with the black, aw we saw only black days under white presidents. Needless to say the center and the left were pushing for this. That momment, still being apolitical, I understood that something was wrong.
In the end he was nothing but a token president meant for token people, finding and fixing token issues.
Very true. History has proven him to be a failure.
The Haertz had an excellent editorial on Obama, how they saw him as an avatar of leftist secular and reform jewish values. All the matrichal values that weaken the west and then were wondering how come they were losing their influence under Trump who was much like their hated right wing president Netanhyu (who has great relations with Saudi). Obama ended hiring people based on merit, but pushed dividing society into racial, gender, and ethnic groups, making it all about punishing the white man who built America. Worst president in the US, can’t even imagine someone that awful
He was black, disappointment is in their blood.
Don’t give a shit about what the losers say. In reality, 99% of people in this Country knew about the evil preys behind false propaganda about Trump.
And wikileaks, blew the door open on the media. They are Soviet Union level propaganda, but more insidious, and thus more dangerous.
Putting this in my backpocket m8.. The Reconquista has begun.
The media counterattack is going to be against us. It will go something like this: “Don’t worry mainstream Americans. It was all because of those terrible sexiest misogyny loving insecure men with racist little dinkies that Trump got elected. We in the media know that mainstream Americans still love all the same stuff we do. Let’s be friends again and socially purge those awful masculine men with their toxic masculinity!”
It will be the usual tactic: divide and conquer. Remember not to help them. Never speak ill of your fellow redpillers in public, and always defend them. If you think you will lose the respect of casual acquaintances and co-workers, do not worry– you never had their respect, anyway.
this.
my most bitter is realizing how much so many groups hate me (whether brainwashed or not)
David Stove’s (an Australian philosopher) noticed the fact that in his time during the 70’s there was an explosion for anti-victorian hate. That hate attributed the morals of specific period was in the end a hate for white, working, heterosexual men and the civilization they created. The liberals are basically nothing but anti-whites that used a politically correct name on them, so that they would one day take power and have a chance to keep it.
It’s important to point this out at every turn. They are the perpetrators of identity politics, cultural division, race baiting, etc.
Careful now, sure you aren’t “virtue signaling”? I kid, I kid.
Every man needs to read Erik Von Kurhnelt Leddihn’s Leftism Revisited. They are the authors of all that crap. I hate how some just reactively think that if the left says that something is bad, it must be good. Racism is a leftist invention (real racism, the idea that your race is an indicator of your character). We mock some for saying democrats are the real racists, but they really are.
Thanks for the book recommendation. I am adding it to my list.
Totally, and thinly veiled at that — “When does it get to be *our* time to be the oppressors?!” Same sniveling whine, different century.
“THIS. Don’t forget this when they start kissing up to us, pretending that they supported us all along: media shills like Jon Liebowitz Stewart, CNN, ESPN..”
Fuck man…. I read your post merely hours just after I caught an article that Kanye Whats-his-face publicly admitted he was for Trump. I suspect we are going to see a whole wave of douche-bag celebs changing their attitude to fit in. I kid you not. These celebs are pathetic, spineless weasels who go with the wind.
I noticed that as well. Someone pointed out that it could be the Kardashian influence, the attention-whore family that’s now realizing that the Democrat party is being broken up. So it’s time to follow the winners, whoever they are.
It reminds me of high school, where the popular girls would bounce from one party to the next depending to where the cool kids were at.
Kanye just being Kanye — an obnoxious, disgraceful, gold-plated hypocrite on turbo.
For the record he did get a chorus of boos at that concert (from all accounts), so that actually showed some balls. Once the pleasure of a ridiculing him passes (+ richly-deserved at that), we might have to get used to the idea that Trump is going to win two-faced converts from the weak/lost side like this.
Compared to the mercurial Kanye flip-flop style, we might prefer the integrity of douchebags who at least stick to their guns when their causes and champions go down in flames, generally, but there’s a “long game” to be played and fuck it, as they “go with the wind” some of them could help nudge the far left back to center, and some might cross over. People can come around and change, and I might buy them their next beer if they’re sincere.
Yes libs are vapid fuck lemmings who would join the John Birch Society if it was trendy or it furthered their career…But K West being pro Trump is kinda a yuuuuuge and could help the God Emperor win over more blacks…
The new legislation forces UK ISPs to store browsing histories, including domains visited, for at least 12cmonths and provide them to the police
in case of investigations. The so-called “snoopers’ charter” was introduced by then home secretary Theresa May 4 years ago, and has twice tried to become a law following breakdowns in the previous coalition government.
so much for Brexit Trump and Freedom… nothing but a public distraction campaign.
No forgiveness, no mercy, their judgments will be swift and final.
Agreed!
I don’t quite get this — if someone saw the err of their ways and decided to cross over (by exiting the liberal left), you’d shell them anyway? Or do you mean just the “media shills” described in Major Styles’ post?
I agree with you but still we must be careful. In Greece during the 90’s there was a phenomenon in which many socialists and even outright Marxists “regretted” their past and entered New Democracy, our cucky party, in a day that party was more left than the PASOK which became more right by this movement. In truth most of these people still believed in the same principles as before, they just changed them names. The result was pure catastrophe, our prime-minister at the time Kostas Karamanlis had some few GOOD ideas that if implemented we would have escaped bankruptcy, fixed our education system a bit and prevented the migrant crisis (by making some island into detention centers) but these people were against those moves from the start preventing them from happening…
You get what I say…
Dude, the republican establishment can’t wait to do just that.
True. That’s why Trump has to put “his guys” in charge, which he appears to be doing.
Yeah, I am not crazy about Cruz or some of the other names floating around other than the non politicians.
I read ‘reptilian establishment’.
Hahaha
Yep, 100% true. I love how the author talks about Muslim and European traditionalists unite. Though I am a woman, I feel I have more in common here than have to deal with some of the local girls who talk about their period on facebook and how their boyfriend who never commits bought them tampons on facebook.
I think that image though would trigger matriarchal secular jews. In my experience Orthodox Judaism is patriarchal, but their culture is matriarchal. So it works out as long as they stay Orthodox, but they leave their religion and become obsessed pushing matriarchy, promiscuity and gay pride on everyone. Orthodox jews despise reform and secular Hollywood jews that push liberalism down everyone’s throat. Notice how they like to push Muslims, Christians and traditional cultures to fight each other.
I remind them at every turn.
We will never be friends with them.
Actions have consequences.
There is no way to turn back time.
Responsibility has always been very triggering for these mindless epicureans.
“But eventually things changed, thanks to Alain Soral, mostly, who emphasized how racial struggle was leading to sterile battles among disenfranchised people while letting the truly powerful off the hook. Mathias Cardet, a black journalist who worked with Soral, showed how gangsta-rap culture was injected and nurtured among non-whites by powerful interests.”
It’s a known fact among music industry insiders that the major record labels made sweetheart deals with the private-prison consortium, to promote rap music with a vengeance, beginning in the early 1990s. The labels’ top executives and AOR reps got stock options in the private prison corporations, to promote rap. Why? To fill up the private prisons with mostly black people, that’s why. Black people have been blinded and programmed in ways they don’t fully realize here.
But then, so have all of us. I’m no Colin Kaepernick fan, don’t get me wrong, but all of humanity has definitely been blinded and programmed, myself included (click image to enlarge)…
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/276f991e738cae2a3dbb3aa6f0b222436299f41ee4bbb4bae54272e2d97910ee.jpg
“It’s a known fact among music industry insiders that the major record
labels made sweetheart deals with the private-prison consortium, to
promote rap music with a vengeance, beginning in the early 1990s.”
Give me some back-up for this known fact – I would love to rub it in some faces
Well like I said, among industry insiders it’s a known fact. There’s an article at Business Insider from 2012 that explains it, although zero names are given (it was from an anonymous source). It’s one of those deals where, if it isn’t in the mainstream media and isn’t backed up by a known source, it has zero credibility. Which is weird, because to me, if it’s in the mainstream media, it has zero credibility, if it contains a known source, because the elite own the mainstream media. It’s pretty simple to deduce this as being an obvious rationale for the sudden explosion of rap music, but deduction and verification are two different things. With that being said, here’s the piece I was talking about, which I personally know to be true, being connected to the inside, but convincing somebody else this is so might be a tough task –
http://www.businessinsider.com/former-music-exec-describes-the-scary-meeting-that-resulted-in-todays-violent-rap-music-2012-5
There are numerous social engineering experiments running. There has to be an explanation of how something like this:
got replaced by gangster rap. I realize much as degraded… but music has especially degraded. I’ve found all this old stuff because modern music was such crap.When I wanted new-to-me stuff to listen to I moved back in time.
The level of skill, creativity and such was maintained for decades (even if music changed forms itself) and then somewhere in the post music-video era it just fell apart. I wonder what the mo-town era names that are still alive think about this connection between the music and prison industries.
Although listening to Post Modern Juke Box I found they can fix some of modern music. By performing as if it were written in earlier age. It just reinforces the idea of some social experiment being pushed.
It’s social engineering. You take a form of “art” that makes babies scream and animals howl upon hearing it, and you fill it with lyrics that tell impressionable black youth that being a gangbanger is “cool” and being a criminal is “cool” and killing people is “cool”. Fill the videos with images of hot girls, and rappers with lots of bling, carrying stacks of cash, and if you think that happened by accident, well, you might just be a(n) ______ (fill in the blank according to one’s own predilections).
Fun fact. Fred Astaire said that that dance sequence by the Nicholas Brothers was the greatest he had ever seen on film.
That was one of the most uncanny, mesmerizing dance sequences I’ve ever seen.
The audience was totally captivated and erupted into an explosion of wild applause afterward. These guys made Savion Glover look like child’s play.
I watched a video featuring drake, rick ross, and some other big rapper about a year ago; all synthetic beats, I was entranced by it, but didnt remember any of the lyrics. A friend watched a show yrs ago, I think called “1,000 Ways to Die”, and the guy was able to get high off these synthetic beats, so much so that he “OD’d”.
You couldnt afford a ticket to a show like that these days. 20 man orchestra, 2 dancers, plus Cab…that is a $500 ticket.
Hep cats = weed smoker, no?
Last large band I went to cost me $10. I think they were 12 piece.
Wasn’t a fancy place like in the film though.
Anyway I meant more the musical skill and class.
Sounds like they do it on the weeekend for the love of it. These old school guys made their living do this
Maybe, maybe not. There are only a few bands that large circulating the area, but they tend to play on off days like Sundays and Wednesdays. Also higher price nights like NYE. The time I was referring to was a sunday. Although the price has gone up to $15 since then. I’d go more but I dislike the venue. With the loss of the primary place I may have to now. I’m not sure how many make their living at it but I know one guy who seems to. He his own band, is part of another and fills in with many others.
Man I liked that show, “1000 Ways to Die”. I think it was on Spike (the channel for guys). The frequencies that rap bass-beats utilize, have been demonstrated to do serious damage to the listener. Buh-WOOOOMMMM. Buh-WOOOOMMMM. Etc. They are hypnotic as well. Add it all up and it’s deliberate mindfucking (like all elitist-controlled “entertainment”).
Light and sound are the creative forces of the universe. So sound affects objects (including humans). Here’s a cool video that demonstrates this fact –
Thanks for chasing this down for me!
I know what you mean. It all makes perfect sense, but its hard to draw the causation from the correlation, as they say.
Scott Adams correctly predicted that this election would start to change the way most people think about themselves. We are more predictable, more irrational, and more robotic than we ever would have believed.
However, one of the benefits to the Red Pill is that we can take on painful truths and use them. If we are robots, we must be careful about who programs us. If others are robots, they can be programmed. If memes are more powerful persuasion tools than reasoned arguments, we can spread memes.
In every pain, there is a lesson. In every heartbreak, there is a moral. In every disaster, there is an opportunity.
This. Yes. Spot-on.
The scientific management of society hasn’t gone anywhere. These things about people have been known anywhere from thousands to tens of years. Since the 1930s it’s on an asymptote to perfection.
They have the schools. They have the younger generations. This has been a project already well over a century long. It’s had many setbacks. The so-called elite behind this are generally patient.
The next four years will allow them to discredit other voices. Trump is just one guy and not a man well versed in individual liberty or much of anything besides persuasion and business deals. He believes in big government, just one he and those like him control.
The SJW and associated crowds have lost and been harmed but they are useful idiots anyway. They would be discarded sooner or later.
They are just tools to an end.
I don’t see this system even skipping a beat really. Trump is on track for absorption.
Clinton Bush Obama … all useful idiots … all super popular at the beginning.. all chewed up and spat out by the end while achieving nothing in real terms for the man in the street. Why should Trump be any different. If hes genuine hes no idea what hes let himself in for. If hes not genuine he’s already screwed – his choices for VP and appointments are horrendous and indicate its an inside job all along.
Trump is different in that he comes from outside the system. The others come from within. The Bushes from Prescott, the Clintons and Obamas brought into it from the time they were in their teens and 20s. Groomed for it. Now I expect that hundreds are groomed for such roles but only a few make it to be president.
But being from outside the system doesn’t mean Trump hasn’t been subject to all the same falsehoods we all are. And that’s the problem. I don’t see any sign of self learning from Trump that he has broken with any of the widely held notions of the need of government to do lots of things. So how different can he really turn out? Like Reagan, a few differences at the margins with potential for long lasting damage. I want to be surprised, I know HRC would be worse, but I worry that Trump’s election gives the system cover for some really nasty things.
We will have to see. For now, we can at least speak more freely about some things and maybe in the future the libtards will have to come up with something better than ‘da rasis’ when criticizing others.
I kind of like electricity and running water 24/7, but there is always the cartridge box.
I didn’t read your comment, but your avatar was so delightfully evil, I had to give it a “like”
Lol! Brilliant comic, mate. Really really nice.
Thanks, my brother in sarcasm…heh.
Im stealing this btw.
Pass it around…have fun.
Hey check out this vid… It’s a compilation of all Trump movie/TV cameos.
You know what most people love even more than politics? Movies. Fucking Hollywood.
I have a hunch this has potential as an effective meme if we want people to stop being bitches and support Trump.
Hmm. I’ll give it a whack. That will be one big image, might have to do a series, but I’ll try to squeeze it into one image, and people can click it and expand it. Is that what you had in mind, Mr. Kent, along with captions, as in, Trump’s dialog. (Don’t melt me with your heat vision, if you would be so kind. I just bought these cheap Chinese sweats – they used to be made in the USA, but the company relocated…)
I didn’t have any particular thing in mind. The thought just occurred to me and you’re on the front lines of the meme wars. I think it works fine just as a Youtube video tbh, it just needs exposure.
I was just pondering whether or not this is the kind of thing that would get libtards to quit their “Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe” shtick.
Logical reasoning is obviously not going to change anyone’s mind… But perhaps the general worship of Hollywood could.
Yeah I thought the video was great in itself (minus the 30-second ad intro). People have short attention spans, so then I thought a graphic might work. Appreciate the input. I will try to figure something out along those lines. It might soften up some hardcore betas and such, so anything that accomplishes that can only be good for our side, and the world in general…
That looks like a stunt double in the wrestling sequence. The parts where you can’t see his face.
That was my favourite clip actually. The fucking POTUS has a cameo on World Wrestling Federation.
Fucking Carlton. That second snippet with Dennis Leary is from the sitcom “The Job”- its the greatest one season sitcom of all time
Black captain calls new latin cops “beans and rice”- cant get away with that anymore
RIP Radio Raheem
yo this is hilarious. even the camerawork and directing seems pretty solid. might have to actually watch this.
Im sure its out there. Theres an ep where his partner goes on about shrimp being the black man’s lobster; Leary asks why isnt lobster the black man’s lobster…one of the greatest episodes of all time
Yeah I forgot how cringey Fresh Prince can be at times.
The World Wrestling cameo was my absolute favourite though, can’t stop laughing it’s so ridiculous.
“Either the leftists utterly deny what we are aware of, for example when they say that whites are not under replacement, or they demonize it as a remnant of some “privilege” or “prejudice.”
————————–
Us: “Immigrants are taking over.”
Them: “That’s so racist!”
Us: “Fuck these immigrants that refuse to learn English.”
Them: “Immigrants are taking over so you better learn to speak Spanish.”
Spot on!!!
The left is blind to their own bigotry and mistakes but so is the right. For example : Hispanics were in the Amercicas first (most of the place names and street names are spanish in california) and hispanics add a huge cultural aspect to the USA (the old cowboy hat, blue jeans and boots that texans wear so proudly american is 100% mexican origin) and many hispanics do speak english just fine.
Just a small example. Trump isjust the Obama for the alt right. Everyone cooing about how amazing its going to be. Trump is going to put in a real police state and make the 1980s dull conservative ideals look like a picnic.
Its all BS in the end. Only the banking mafia wins.
The guys Trump chose confirms it. Ron Paul knows what’s up.
Us: Muslims breed like rabbits. They used to be 5% of the population, now 10% and projected to be 30% by 2050. They clearly want to outbreed us in our own lands.
Libtards: Who told you that? Faux News? That’s so racist.
Us: Fuck those muslims who refuse to live by our ways. Adapt or leave!
Muslims: You better repent because Islam is the fastest growing religion. Insh’Allah you will revert to Islam soon.
The whole thing is a conjob. Trump is the perfect strawman to take the blame for the coming economic crisis. Bait and switch liberals and conservatives every election cycle or two. Keep everyone hopeful and guessing – while the song remains the same.
Did liberals and blacks really get such a great run with Obama or did more money get poured into the police security state and the military industrial complex and more pointless (fake) wars.
Is Trump really going to make a difference or just more of the same. Your answer is above and you are fooling yourself if you think theres any real shift taking place here. If anything the shift will be back to liberal faggots when Trump fails to produce the goods.
Its a divide and conquer strategy – sew discord and discontent amongst one group pretend to give them a bit of power for an election cycle or two then flip back the other way. Its about as meaningful as a waiter changing the table cloth for the next bunch of diners. President of the USA is always the same puppet. Only the face and the color of the tie changes every 4-8 years.
The real show is run out of London and the CIA NSA FBI MI6 are their private army of thugs. You know what a mafia is right ? Absolutely zero is going to change anytime soon. Only the suckers falling for the magicans trick. The left fell for Obama who did zero. The right falls for Trump who sets up the next lefty to step up and trick the lefties again. Same old story since 1900.
They’re not gods man. The Soviet Union was ruthless and had smart tough men pushing it forward and they still screwed up all the time, got caught in lies and were plagued by failures. They were an actual worldwide conspiracy and were more or less found out all the time.
The “elites” are no different. Nobody in the world could have set up a Trump win. Of course we’re in for a rough ride no matter who is president. We’ve ignored the gods of the copybook headings too hard for too long not to be.
But our enemies are just flesh and blood and they really aren’t as smart and all powerful as some conspiracy theories make them out to be. They can be defeated and if nothing else the Trump victory proved that.
I guess they key is, if you’re wrong, how would you know?
Literally this.
You are literally Hitler.
Trump is lits Neagan.
Excellent Pepe heavy article. But why is this one wearing le Jacques strap on his head?
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/337ec880a57a04b6e1500bc4daf92382bacc4e6422687c3aec3799dd9672beb1.png
The real question is: why are you not?
Touché
The stab at the system that was Trump is being absorbed by the system. Trump is being surrounded and encased by the system. The foreign object is being dealt with by the immune system.
I have a bad feeling the so-called elites will see this as their chance to profit and gain by crashing the economy. Punish people for voting for Trump and problem-reaction-solution.
Absolutely correct….. if anything its engineered. Police state, new war on drugs, zero rights for anyone, huge gangland violence like the 70s and 80s. Narrow minded anti everything conservatism. Big business rules. Pollution, wars and turmoil. Perfect to rake huge profits. Shit for everyone else.
If the lefties got a bit of a shock that Obama turned out to be GW in a nigger mask. Trump is going to make Gw look like Ghandi. Just wait for the next 9/11 attacks. Even the election result was announced on 11/9. It cant be clearer whats coming is going to be terrible for everyone.
“huge gangland violence like the 70s and 80s” What? The crime rates aren’t anywhere near the 70’s or 80’s, and even if they were, Trump hasn’t taken office yet so it isn’t his fault
Please explain how he is being “absorbed”?
look at the people around him. Almost entirely establishment and establishment safe.
Besides Sessions, I mean who?
John Kerry sec of state?
general Flynn?
rudy?
The list keeps growing daily.
“John Kerry sec of state?” Nope. He isn’t anywhere on his public list nor any leaked lists…
“general Flynn? ” I don’t understand. He was a general and had 2 years as director the DIA, that really isn’t an “insider”. Did you expect Trump to do a Stalinesque great purge?
Keep your optimism if you want. The writing is already on the wall.
Weren’t you all anti-Trump before the election? You should if anything, be happy that trump is choosing the “establishment” for a cabinet.
I am anti-power. Still am. I believe Trump is nothing more but the same his way instead of their way. Trump isn’t a man who has educated himself in things like libertarian power elite analysis or austrian economics or anything actually alternative to the status quo in some principled sense. Every appointment except maybe one has confirmed that.
For instance, Trump is pro school vouchers. He’ll end up handing over all the affordable private schools to the government as a result. These schools will become dependent on voucher students and by extension will have to adopt government curriculum to preserve their voucher taking status. http://www.targetliberty.com/2016/11/horror-trump-picks-betsy-devos-for.html Affordable independent private schools have been a problem for the utopia builders for a century. Trump will get rid of that problem.
Will Trump delay some things? sure. But he’s going to advance others. And he’s still an authoritarian.
I really don’t care, Libertarianism is a pipe dream, and you (Libertarians) are blinded to what good government has actually done.
Good things like giving women leverage over men. Creating a debt based economy that undermines productive men. And that’s just the beginning of the good government has done in the USA over the last century.
Not necessarily, I support things like food standards, medicine standards, access to healthcare without upfront cost, access to the basics of Maslows hierarchy, scientific research, education, etc. No fault divorce doesn’t have anything to do with “big government” quite the opposite in fact, its government taking off a requirement for divorce, so it is in fact the Libertarian, not Authoritarian position.
Private standards work just fine. Much of what you buy is covered by private standards and the government standards were often copied from pre-existing private standards. What you want are government standards that lock in the status quo and allow specific industries and corporations to extract wealth from the population. Go look at the history of government intervention into medical care starting with the flexner report. It’s all about making prices higher. From day one.
“Private standards work just fine.” Its not just standards, how do you know if what you are buying actually contains what you want it to contain? Can you give any example of a developed country that actually follows this private self regulation and standardization model?
“Go look at the history of government intervention into medical care starting with the flexner report.” the Flexner report was made by a private institution, and anyways, its results meant better standards in medical care. So what about it? This doesn’t prove government is bad, it just proves that in isolated cases, the private industry did something good.
Private standards still dominate many global industries including the device you used to make that response. When government decides it wants to take over something it takes the private standards. When Nader wrote his tome of engineering and automotive ignorance the government took the opportunity to take standards away from SAE. It previously had taken many road and traffic control device standards earlier in the century. However even to this day ITE still holds a great many.
Which country uses private standards? All of them. Every single one. People have been using private standards long before the modern regulatory state came into being and they still do. Even the government standards they use in the areas they are deployed originated as private standards were taken simply for political reasons and the gains of those in politics.
Most government standards are self-certified to just like the private standards are. There’s no difference here with the honesty of the company providing the good to have tested it against the applicable standard.
Who influences the government standards? The big existing players in any given industry. The government standards quickly turn towards barriers to entry. That’s another reason government can easily make these take overs. Not just the popular sales pitch appealing to the population but where a few big players can get the ear of government to eliminate the competition.
The libertarian world isn’t only workable, we all live in it, at least in part every single day. Where we deviate from it is where the problems come in. The deviations with the use of the state are specifically to benefit some at the expense of others.
The flexner report resulted in government taking medical care out of the free market. It spurred on the first government interference. To increase prices as every government reform since has done because they were designed to do that. Medical care is the mess it is today because it was designed to be that way to extract wealth from people.
“To increase prices as every government reform since has done because they were designed to do that.” Well can you actually give one example of a functioning free market healthcare system? Can you give actual data on how it preforms better than a Bismark style healthcare system?
Performs better? The point was to increase prices and take a bigger share of the national economy. Look at the numbers. See how much the medical sector takes in these days. See how doctors live. See how medical company and hospital executives live. It wasn’t that way in 1910. That’s the measure of their success.
I said the Bismark model, your still fixating on this US. I hate the US system, it isn’t what I advocate for at all.
We were discussing the regulatory system as it exists in the USA. 19th century Germany is of no relevance to the discussion and it’s insertion by you is nonsensical. The problems it suffers from are of a different nature, those related to socialism vs. those related to crony or state capitalism. Of course soon the US regulators will give us both.
“We were discussing the regulatory system as it exists in the USA.” I can support whatever regulatory mechanism I want. The fact that you put arbitrary barriers to what I can support just shows the intellectual dishonesty of Libertarianism. You are placing a false dilemma.
No, you want to play libertarian wack-a-mole. You want to keep bringing up new subjects into infinity. This isn’t my first dance. Ignorant statists love to constantly change the subject because they lack the background to discuss any subject with depth. Government school taught myths and politicians’ claims simply don’t work when confronted with someone who knows the background history. Hence the standard of subject changing hoping to find a subject the libertarian opponent hasn’t studied. Where the statist can find equal footing. That’s the intellectual dishonesty you are deploying.
Bismarck’s socialism has been dealt with numerous times by libertarians. The material is out there if you’re interested in it.
Ok, let’s discuss bismarkian socialism. What aspect do you want to discuss?
How about Frederic Howe’s words:
“The state has its finger on the pulse of the worker from the cradle to
the grave. His education, his health, and his working efficiency are
matters of constant concern. He is carefully protected from accident by
laws and regulation governing factories. He is trained in his hand and
in his brain to be a good workman and is insured against accident,
sickness, and old age. While idle through no fault of his own, work is
frequently found for him. When homeless, a lodging is offered so that he
will not easily pass into the vagrant class.”
We are looking at a new industrialized version of the good old human condition of producing for the top of the pyramid and obeying it in exchange for security. Of course in the USA the idea is to simply not pay up on the back end but get the people’s labors on the front end. But I digress. Keeping people tied to laboring for the capstone is why the medical cartel has not been constrained in the USA but instead we have a medical insurance mandate. That’s to keep people locked into corporate employment. So they can’t make the monthly nut required to set off on their own.
The same basic notions of what is more broadly defined as human farming have gone on for thousands of years in evolving forms. Bismarck modernized it extensively with his social insurance programs and did so intentionally. The individual then exists for the state. Prussian notions like these were modified in the USA to where the old fashioned idea of the ruling class having some responsibility to the people was tossed to the side and the people were simply to be exploited.
You see single payer medical care in the USA when:
A) the medical cartel can make more money that way. That is charge more and provide less.
or
B) the present system of ever increasing prices simply falls apart when people reach their limits and refuse treatment or go to developing countries where good medical care is offered at a reasonable free market price.
I suspect B) will be met by travel restrictions and compelling people to be treated.
“The state has its finger on the pulse of the worker from the cradle to
the grave. His education, his health, and his working efficiency are
matters of constant concern. He is carefully protected from accident by
laws and regulation governing factories. He is trained in his hand and
in his brain to be a good workman and is insured against accident,
sickness, and old age. While idle through no fault of his own, work is
frequently found for him. When homeless, a lodging is offered so that he
will not easily pass into the vagrant class.”
Okay? I don’t see how this is a bad thing? Germany had (and still has) the biggest economy in Europe at the time, and (it continues) to have very very cheap and effective healthcare.
You like being a domesticated animal? I don’t.
Cheap? Government takes the largest tax bite it can and then gives you the absolute minimum it can get away with in return. That much is universal.
I would rather have a free market that rapidly develops better and better things that cost less and less. BTW, I used to work in the medical device field. The company I worked for was tilting windmills trying to provide better and cheaper treatment against the headwind of single payer. It didn’t work. Single payer won and treatment remained frozen in the 1960s.
“You like being a domesticated animal?” When you realize Domesticated animals (both in the literal and metaphorical sense) have better life expectancy, better food and food security, better access to medical care, and just all around better quality of life compared to wild animals (in both the sense of actual wild animals and people living under libertarianism) then yeah, I do like being that.
“I would rather have a free market that rapidly develops better and better things that cost less and less.” Except that they don’t. Almost all innovation had some sort of government promotion. Jets? Government promoted. Electronics? Government promoted. Medical care and research? Almost everything was and continues to be government promoted (example: NIH).
“provide better and cheaper treatment against the headwind of single payer.” I presume you are talking about Canada, but I agree with you on this. The National Insurance model of healthcare (as is used in Canada) is shit, I don’t support it and never have. I am in support of either the Beveridge model (specifically only if it leaves freedom for private medical care) or the Bismark mode (which isn’t single payer in any sense).
Why are you on this site if you think humanity is better off with society managed by an elite? Are you here just to troll? If you want to be some sort of slave, that’s your business. You have no business forcing others into servitude.
So not only do you believe in the domestication of man but also the idea that all flows from the state. It’s absolutely false. If all flowed from the state the soviet union would rule the earth. Crony capitalism, warfare states, and such does create various misallocations of resources but these are what Bastiat referred to as the seen and the unseen. You have no idea what would have been had the state not controlled that allocation of wealth. BTW, Bastiat wrote in the 1840s. That’s how long ago this statist nonsense of yours was debunked. If you’re going to slam libertarian intellectual honesty at least have a clue about the basic literature. Bastiat, VonMises, Rothbard, Spooner, etc.
Much of the work was done well outside government control and funding anyway. I also hardly think that government’s obsession with turning living human beings into corpses is something to cherish just because maybe somethings found secondary uses.
I am talking about the USA. There are certain things which are single payer. That was because of the expense in the 1960s. All it has served to do is freeze treatment modes in the 1960s. The political system cannot and does not change as fast as the market can. Once the company I worked for went out of business the life expectancy for the people who used the machine went from normal to five years on the government treatment schedule. Their quality of life went from near normal to possibly as bad as not worth living. Most if not all those people are probably dead now ten plus years later. Single payer’s rationing of resources and effectively dictating treatment is an abstraction to you. It’s real people to me.
Why would do you need any private medical care to exist? For the rich? To develop things to keep the system going? To provide a relief valve? If your socialism was so good get rid of it. Most socialist systems are well aware that for their survival any remaining private system must be so expensive that only the richest can afford it otherwise the socialist system will only serve the very poorest, cheapskates, and so on. It exists only for the rich and the political hierarchy. everyone else gets treated like livestock. If his productivity warrants saving him, he gets saved. If not, he doesn’t.
“Why are you on this site if you think humanity is better off with society managed by an elite?” I never said they should be run my elite. That implies that the rulers of society should be put in a separate class, having privileges such as Sovereign immunity, which I am very much against.
“If you want to be some sort of slave, that’s your business.” What is with all of the melodrama so popular among the right wing and libertarian branch of politics? I think SJW’s are a bunch of crybabies, but at least they don’t say retarded shit like “OMG! I have to give a month of paid vacation!? This is slavery!”
“So not only do you believe in the domestication of man but also the idea that all flows from the state. ” Nope. The vast majority of innovation comes from private institutions, however the state helps spur innovation and do the initial development.
“I also hardly think that government’s obsession with turning living human beings into corpses is something to cherish just because maybe somethings found secondary uses.” That isn’t inherent to statism. Austria, Switzerland, Finland, and other countries are statist by your standards, yet they are not warmongers. Cite: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.CON.GOVT.ZS?end=2015&start=2015&view=map&year=2015
“I am talking about the USA. There are certain things which are single payer.” Are you talking about Medicaid and medicare? Again, this using the national health insurance model, which as I said before, I am against.
“Single payer’s rationing of resources and effectively dictating treatment is an abstraction to you. It’s real people to me.” Where do you keep getting the idea that I support this system?
“Why would do you need any private medical care to exist?” I think it should exist because I admit that Beveridge model provides pretty shitty healthcare, however, the government isn’t their to give you great healthcare, they are there to provide basic healthcare to those who need it. The Beveridge system is very cheap, and if for a few thousand dollars per person per year (about how much it costs when you compare it to other countries that use Beveridge such as Sweden, England, Denmark, Spain, or Norway) we can give everyone healthcare (even if its shit) why not? It will actually cost less than medicare and medicaid already cost, and rich, middle class, and even most poor people will already be able to afford private healthcare.
“If your socialism was so good get rid of it.” As I admit, socialism isn’t “good”, its just tolerable, and that is all it needs to be.
“Most socialist systems are well aware that for their survival any remaining private system must be so expensive that only the richest can afford it otherwise the socialist system will only serve the very poorest, cheapskates, and so on.” Which is exactly what I intend the socialist system to serve…
Your formatting is horrid. Here’s how to make it readable:
“I never said they should be run my elite. That implies that the rulers of society should be put in a separate class, having privileges such as Sovereign immunity, which I am very much against.”
You made the argument for domestication, regulation, control by an elite. All collectives have to be run by someone. Those people will have more privileges and will be immune. That’s the way it works. That’s the way states work. That’s what you’re arguing for but you don’t understand it.
“What is with all of the melodrama”
You’re babbling. If you want to be cared for by masters, that’s your business and nearly everyone else doesn’t have to be dragged into it with you.
” Nope. The vast majority of innovation comes from private institutions, however the state helps spur innovation and do the initial development.”
In your last post you just argued about how things spring forth from the state and not private initiative. That’s two instances of you arguing both sides. You’re showing yourself to be a troll getting his jollies by keeping the exchange going. In any case you don’t know what would have been without the state’s interference.
“That isn’t inherent to statism.”
You’re putting words in my mouth. Furthermore those nations aren’t taking the wealth of the people who live there presently and turning them into military hardware and then claiming the secondary uses make it all worth it.
“Are you talking about Medicaid and medicare?”
I am talking about one of the conditions in the USA that is single payer. The treatment there of is hemodialysis.
“It will actually cost less than medicare and medicaid already cost, and rich, middle class, and even most poor people will already be able to afford private healthcare.”
You clearly don’t understand the forces behind things in the USA and the level of taxes required to provide bare bones “health care” in those other countries.
“Which is exactly what I intend the socialist system to serve.”
That is you’re going to use violence or at least the threat of it to take from A and give to B.
“You made the argument for domestication, regulation, control by an elite. All collectives have to be run by someone. Those people will have more privileges and will be immune. That’s the way it works. That’s the way states work. That’s what you’re arguing for but you don’t understand it.”
Ever heard of direct democracy? Anyways, here is a basic model of how I would have a system work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Switzerland
“In your last post you just argued about how things spring forth from the state and not private initiative.”
Nope, I said that the INITIAL development is usually done by states. Implementation and further development of this is done by private entities.
“I am talking about one of the conditions in the USA that is single payer. The treatment there of is hemodialysis.”
Okay, so you are talking about Medicare, particularly the end stage renal disease program for people with chronic kidney disease. Again, this operates under a Canadian national insurance plan, which as I said, I do not support.
“the level of taxes required to provide bare bones “health care” in those other countries.”
The NHS budget 2015 was 101 billion pounds. That is 125 billion dollars. Divide that by 53 million people who live in England, and it comes out to 2,360 dollars per person. Medicare/Medicaid collectively cost 1.1 trillion dollars. Divide that by 315 million people in the US, and you come out to 3,500 dollars per person. Not only is Beveridge cheaper, its significantly cheaper, as in cheap enough that a significant number of people who currently do not have private insurance will be able to now get insurance coverage.
“That is you’re going to use violence or at least the threat of it to take from A and give to B.”
Well yes, exactly. However, this is called life, you are going to have to deal with taxes either way, and frankly I want the option where I pay 2,360 dollars a year and get free (low quality) medical care with the option to pay for premium medical care rather than the option where I pay 3,500 a year so that someone else can have medical care and then pay even more just to get low quality healthcare.
“Ever heard of direct democracy?”
More wackamole. When you fail just send another mole up. Why don’t we discuss the atmosphere of Neptune? The engineering principles of ball bearing selection? That’s what you’re doing. Every time you’re confronted by something you introduce something else. You don’t want it the way you said before, you want this other way.
It’s pretty fuckin’ clear at this point that all you want is the last word and to annoy me.
Direct democracy, when combined with what you’ve stated previously is nothing more than tyranny of the majority. This would be especially true of the modern USA where the principles of individual liberty and the culture there of has been effectively eroded to turn the ballot box into an instrument of theft. This isn’t Switzerland and the culture that makes their system work for them doesn’t exist here. Which of course you’re likely well aware of.
“Nope, I said that the INITIAL development is usually done by states.
Implementation and further development of this is done by private
entities.”
Obviously you want to pretend that you don’t understand what spring forth from means. It means that it springs forth, initiates from government. You’re clearly in this to annoy me and get the last word. Furthermore what you’ve just rewarded it to is a government-corporate partnership, which is the economics of fascism.
“Okay, so you are talking about Medicare, particularly the end stage
renal disease program for people with chronic kidney disease. Again,
this operates under a Canadian national insurance plan, which as I said,
I do not support.”
It operates on single payer where the federal government dictates what it will pay for and how much. Care is rationed to three times a week conventional dialysis because that’s what fedgov pays for based on its 1960s cost model. I’ve seen what the fedgov has prevented. It’s care that today would be affordable to most working people. It’s also good enough that patients are healthy enough to work a full time job. It changes a crippling condition into something that takes a couple hours a day to deal with.
Likewise the NHS in the UK considers things costs and decides what and how much it will pay. It rations care based on cost with the same decisions of who lives and who dies and with what quality of life. That’s the power those who control states are after. To control the price of livestock care.
Outside of these few single payer pieces in the USA it operates on a crony capitalist model where taxes are used patch over the problems caused by the high prices that result from the crony system. Care is not rationed, and why would it be when the point is to take in as much money as possible? It’s a high cost system because it was designed as one, because the people with the real power are on the revenue receiving end here instead of the paying end like in the UK. There is a desire to collapse this system and go with a traditional livestock set up where people who aren’t productive enough are simply left to die, but it’s not there yet.
“Well yes, exactly. However, this is called life, you are going to have
to deal with taxes either way, ”
So you’re one of the few that admits the violence inherent in the system (to quote dennis). Well why don’t you accept feminism? Embrace it? Why are you on this site? They have worked the political process and thus get to wield its violence against men like you (you chose the typical male name of Andrew).
“and frankly I want the option where I pay
2,360 dollars a year and get free (low quality) medical care with the
option to pay for premium medical care rather than the option where I
pay 3,500 a year so that someone else can have medical care and then pay
even more just to get low quality healthcare.”
It doesn’t work that way. Some people pay a lot and get nothing or little and others pay nothing and get something. Furthermore why would you want the US federal government with its roughly two centuries of social engineering and eugenics experimentation on any peoples it gets in its grasp to control your medical care?
“More wackamole. When you fail just send another mole up.”
That is the thing, there is a near infinite number of combinations of government besides Libertarianism, and you are arguing that Libertarianism is absolutely the only good one, and it absolution has all the solutions to every situation, across the board, in every country.
“Furthermore what you’ve just rewarded it to is a government-corporate partnership, which is the economics of fascism.”
Well, sounds good to me…
“So you’re one of the few that admits the violence inherent in the system”
Yes I do, and honestly I don’t see why its such a big deal.
“Well why don’t you accept feminism?”
The state should work towards goals that increase the overall well-being of a society, and feminism is very much harmful to the well-being of society.
“They have worked the political process and thus get to wield its violence against men like you”
Simply because the state is currently not in my favor does not mean I am against the state as a whole. As I said before, there are a variety of different policies a state can implement, the ones currently implemented do not need to be there.
“Furthermore why would you want the US federal government with its roughly two centuries of social engineering and eugenics experimentation on any peoples it gets in its grasp to control your medical care?”
The US government isn’t a single entity, its a group of people, constantly changing people, and if America had actual democracy, they could you know, actually boot people out of office when fuck ups happen. There are also mechanisms to keep this from happening. The system could be setup in a fashion such as the FCC or Federal Reserve and act complete independent of the rest of the US government.
“you are arguing that Libertarianism is absolutely the only good one,”
Well when one starts assigning me arguments that typically means the number of moles is running low. I’ve argued nothing of the sort. I’ve merely pointed out what your statism is.
“Well, sounds good to me…”
Does not surprise me you like economic fascism, considering you’ve already defended being domesticated, the use of violence, and top down down management of society.
“Yes I do, and honestly I don’t see why its such a big deal.”
You will when the guns are pointed at you and you’re the one being exploited.
“The state should work towards goals that increase the overall well-being of a society, and feminism is very much harmful to the well-being of society.”
That’s your opinion and they have their opinion and they have the guns, or at least those who will do their bidding do, not you. That means your opinion doesn’t count by your own rules.
“Simply because the state is currently not in my favor does not mean I am against the state as a whole. As I said before, there are a variety of different policies a state can implement, the ones currently implemented do not need to be there.”
That won’t happen until you have greater firepower. You accept the premise of the state so obey. Do what you’re told. You don’t have the firepower either politically, economically, or literally so that’s not going to happen. The state will never be in your favor. Why don’t you accept life as it is presented to you as told me to?
“The US government isn’t a single entity, its a group of people, constantly changing people”
It’s remarkably consistent over the last 150 years and certainly the last 100, especially on the single topic I remarked on to which you’re replying here. The fact is that the US fedgov’s track record shows you do not want it handling your medical care or anything else.
“and if America had actual democracy,”
Actual democracy? Such as tyranny of the majority? Whatever you’re calling actual democracy it was never supposed to be that here and never will be.
“they could you know, actually boot people out of office when fuck ups happen.”
There aren’t any fuck ups. It’s working as designed and people can be booted out only to be replaced by those who will do the same thing. That’s the design. Been that way since Wilson occupied the WH.
“There are also mechanisms to keep this from happening. The system could be setup in a fashion such as the FCC or Federal Reserve and act complete independent of the rest of the US government.”
The federal reserve is a privately owned institution. The last owners’ list was leaked in the 1980s. If you want a currency totally independent of the state then your choices are precious metals. Other commodity money could be used but generally accepted is gold and silver.
Well, since we took ’em down for $400 last night on the Thursday Night NFL game, let’s take that profit and try to increase our bankroll again tonight. If we lose it, we have lost virtually nothing. If we win, we have expanded our profit…
NBA – take Boston +7.5 on the spread side for $110, and on the money line (to win) for $50, against Golden State at home. And take Sacramento +9 on the spread side for $110, and on the money line (to win) for $50, against the L.A. Clippers at home.
Once you get ahead, the idea, obviously, is to keep increasing your bankroll, by dumping your profit back into select games. Sure, you’ll take some hits, but that’s part of life. And if you know what you’re doing, the money that you make will beat the pants off of any other investment you can possibly think of – short of being an insider on a huge IPO, or something along those lines.
Seize the day while you still have a pulse, forge ahead and go for it while your legs still work. “If you don’t take chances, there will be no life-changing advances.” That’s the spirit.
***Update: Well, I split my spread bets and lost both the money line bets. Net for evening: 1-3, -$110. That’s the way it goes – all rum and no clothes. Saturday and Sunday will be a different story, however. They always are. Ch-ching. See you near the dumpster later tonight behind Sam’s Town. I got some badass Ripple at a discount. And that shit is tasty. Mm-hmm.
My money’s on Ward over Kovalev on Saturday. Kov is good but Ward is too technical.
I don’t do much MMA or boxing betting. Once in a blue moon. I’d have to defer to your judgment on the matter (after checking the odds).
“Being pro-white, pro-masculinity and pro-tradition does not require
being white: I often felt closer from Muslims with good intentions, i.e.
Muslims who were genuine believers and not rancorous people using Islam
as a mask for anti-white tribalism, than from white liberals. The
Muslims would not share my blood, but they would share some of my
awareness and yearning for Tradition, two things that white liberals
eagerly reject.”
Yeeeesssssss……
The enemy of my enemy is my ally.
Just co-operate towards the same goal, then after that, just leave each other be.
“We are the future?” Is that not a little narcissistic? Come on. It’s just an political bullshit game in the end. Why should any of us identify strongly with it?
Seriously, I get that its funny to make “God Emperor Trump” videos, but to really believe he is some kind of messiah … comparable to the moon landing … actually, why would anyone identify with the moon landing either? Who the fuck cares? Doesn’t anybody have a life beyond what the TV tells them?
We are neither exalted nor chosen by God. We are also just playing a part in the game. Surely a little humility can give a more realistic perspective.
Sometimes I wonder whether Trump is paying writers to write articles on ROK recently or whether this kind of political naivety is real.
I understand your criticism, they often exaggerated on the way they refer to Trump. I think they’re just trying to get us excited about the possibilities we have now.
Don’t be too quickly to judge the emotivity of this article. I think we can afford to get a little excited after this Trump victory.
Also, I don’t think they talked of the moon landing as an indentity point, they were refering to the fact that it was a remarkable event of history to those who witnessed it.
I am always skeptical of this kind of language. Maybe I’m paranoid, maybe I’m a buzzkill, but I can’t really help myself. If you say its all in good fun … hm. It reads pretty serious to me, kinda.
And when I say naivete, I mean: Trump has not even entered office yet. We take his word for gospel instead of being skeptical and waiting to scrutinize him when he does. Because it’s very possible he’s just a bullshitter. We don’t know it yet, so I think we shouldn’t praise him for something he hasn’t done yet (except defeat Hillary). Trump is a promise. A good promise, but one that hasn’t been delivered on yet.
Agreed. I’m leery about some of his appointments. Honestly, it doesn’t bode well.
I’ve heard he’s already started wheeling and dealing. Like threatening American car manufacturers (Ford) manufacturing abroad with a 35% tariff.
It’s just that NOBODY IS REPORTING IT.
Hm!
I understand and I think you have a point. However, the impression that this article gave me is that it was trying to be optimistic in order to motivate us to take action. Action is what we need now.
We can’t merely sit down and whait for Trump to do anything. As traditional men, we have to take responsability over our individual fields of action and social influence to bring change, we have to start to prepare the road for traditionalism to the next generations as well.
In order to do that, we have no other options than to trust on Trump. Skeptcism is reasonable, it is what will keep you from being deceived in any way, but I don’t think anyone is really think of Trump as some sort of messiah, we just realize that the necessity of action right now is more important than our external concerns.
The TV’s message has been telling us pretty strongly to despise Trump though.
Yeah I mean, whether true or not, media is media. The outside world out there … the ‘big’ stuff. It’s only big in our minds. Although, come think of it … maybe this is a false belief. That politics don’t matter. That only eggheads concern themselves with politics. Hm.
Is this a riddle? The notion that politics doesn’t matter in the sense that its only something eggheads trouble themselves with seems like something the elite or people who benefit would downplay upon the subjugated.
Apathy from belief in a rigged game one has no control over I can understand.
No, not a riddle. It was a kind of belief I held. You are right, that’s what they would want us to believe. On the other hand, I do think it’s rigged. But who knows, maybe it’s rigged in a way that allows a little influence.
“We are the future. It doesn’t matter where we are. We are those with true awareness”
Just to remember: you’re the future only if you have children, so that they can carry this awareness to the next generation. If there was ever a time to raise a family, the time is now!
Well the demographics of America are changing rapidly.The whites really need to have children and they need to be a lot.Otherwise USA will become like Latin America in the next 100 years.Hispanic populations is increasing rapidly.
Exactly!
I know many guys here don’t want to hear this, but It’s time to stop fucking around and embrace the Alpha Provider role. Everyone here like to talk and talk, but now is the time were we will see who are the real Alphas, the ones that will take the responsability they have denied all this time.
Red Pill people arent very smart like the blue pill.Trump is phony and fraud.He is like the Right version of Barrack Obama.Remember hope and change.Well here is the same.
Is Hillary’s political career really dead…or…
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/57538f9d0845e5b3f6c4512fe3c7b44aa2e57ef51b9aad6fb6a18cc95401b06b.jpg
That was a fun movie.
Yes. Goofy, too.
How did the shitlibs railroad western culture? They monopolized THE BEARD! (College professors all seemed to sport the Marxy beards). Non bearded traditionalists, neo cons and televangelists with their exposed chins all became naked targets for the bearded lefty cabal of academic shitlords and their armies of radical bearded rabble. They utilized the POWER OF THE BEARD and the conservative traditionalists largely didn’t. The bitching henpeckers and wives amongst us did common domestic house bitch manipulation such as refusing ass to a stubbly faced daddy man. The bitches demanded their men’s faces to be kept baby butt smooth or no sorry crumbs of booty leftovers for daddy. Well I’m MCGOO and that’s all about to CHANGE BY GOLLY. So pull up a chair and let’s talk HAIR.
PEPE – – How long do you think Pepe will perservere without A BEARD!
http://i.imgur.com/m2wNjLB.png
PROBLEM FIXED. – – Now on to Trump.
http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/,scalefit_600_noupscale/56e050231500002a000b1772.jpeg
Trump won by a true landslide but he did so without a beard. He must now plough foreward into the turbulent waters as a TRUE BEARDED CAPTAIN. I hope to God Trump gets his beard on PRONTO. The stakes are just too damn high to go into this clean shaven. Remember Romney 2012?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/2012_presidential_election,_results_by_congressional_district.png/462px-2012_presidential_election,_results_by_congressional_district.png
He was so close. But unfortunately in 2012 MCGOO had a piece of shit cracked smartphone and ROK was but a glimmer in some obscure bloggers imagination. So Romney never could hear, much less heed the words of MCGOO to GET THE BEARD ON man. A beard would have delivered like none other on 11/07/2012 and THIS MAN would be entering his second term in the White House:
http://www.name-list.net/img/portrait/Zedo_2.jpg
Notice the difference? You see, when shaven, a man compromises some of their natural ingrained senses and intuitions. Einstein and psychics like Kenny Kingston all have had a big electrostatic bush of hair and they were known for having attuned to and sharpened their extra senses and perceptions.
THE HAIR FOLLICLE acts as both an antenna and transducer. It is a strand of hair attached to a grounded body much like a simple crystal detector radio RF modulator. It pics up RF frequencies from UHF to ultra low. The flood of overlapping signals are like white noise but many are able to modulate the signals and moulate information in the form of intuition. In many militaries, the antennae (hair) are shaved and chopped off to produce blind unquestioning order takers, but an indipendent renegade and soverign warrior has footlong locks. They can feel the entire battlefield. (Conan the Barbarian). A pussy hound with his ‘antennae’ intact can triangulate and hone in a tingling snatch that’s emitting vibratory RF that the shave mugged man misses.
On a sidenote, Romney follows in line with a BYU campus ban on beards initiated during the 70’s that was in retalliation to the ‘dirty hippies’. The ban is still in effect and just recently BYU allowed Muslim students to keep their beards, BUT NOT WHITIE. I’d normally like to patronize the LDS but they have some cucks and cuckery that needs uprooted. Like ending how mainstream LDS takes favor to circumcising and shaving their males. What will they do next? Clip their tails and ears? The CIA can never hire enough shaved obedient robo servants you know. Their divorce rates are climbing too. YOU CAN’T DOMINATE A SINGLE BITCHWIFE OR MULTIPLE WIVES WITH A CHOPPED OFF BEARD AND CHOPPED OFF DICKHEAD!! Did the bitch wrath of 70’s feminism covertly win over the mainstream LDS? On the other hand, polygamous FLDS celebrates beards. Brigham Young himself sported a halo of hair, from top to bottom, forehead to chin, all the way around his pussy plundering and commanding face.
https://beggarsbreaddotcom.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/brigham.gif
What a nifty “daa-whoop” curly crown on top huh Beave? Proof that it’s not all over by 40. Not for bearded hairy men that is. The divorce rape and cuckmother slam that a man is ready for the glue factory by age 40 is nothing but pure feminist bullshit. Hairy patriarch men don’t die. They live on. Post wall women are the ones who are done by 40. At best, they’re domestic fucktoys and bread bakers after 40 whereas the males have lifelong fertility.
Throughout his years, Brigham Young had a robust beard and he had nooo problem CLEAVING BEAVERS, marrying numerous women aging from the teens on upwards. The photo above of Brigham was taken when he was in his 40’s. This is when he joined the original polygamous Mormons, and within a year he began expandeding his monogamous family from one wife to a harem of FIFTY-FIVE WIVES within a five year period.
Even a decade later, Brigham’s top hair is thinning, the curly-Q subsiding but his cock-a-doodle remained lifelong, projecting his seedline with the powerful trio of ‘BEARD, FERTILITY and DOODLE DOO’.
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1067632/images/o-MORMON-BEARD-RULE-facebook.jpg
Let’s face it. Hair takes time to grow and there seems to be different dimentions and degrees of masculine acumen with proportion to hair. Brigham Young was a pussy marauder but Mitt Romney? Modern day Mormons aren’t taught anymore that to fully develop your masculine senses and to activate and make full use of your faculties YOU NEED HAIR, lots of it.
High ‘T’ men may lose top hair but never the beard. Somewhat like pubic hair, the BEARD never baldens. And that’s where THE POWER is.THE BEARD ADVANTAGE
http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/images/photos/002/856/008/979b0177ad04b5926997edc986ac72c6_crop_north.jpg?w=630&h=420&q=75
Whether you’re destined to be a mighty soverign warrior or a pussy hound of seismic proportions, HAIR SEALS THE DEAL. You can see with John Cena, you reach a level of alpha with a big rhinocerous dick and beefed up biceps, but then what on earth are you going to peacock with? A propellor hat? Come on seriously. It’s all about peacocking and in the coming decades, you’d be best to start cultivating a full bush like yesterday.
https://ath.unileverservices.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/07/mens-long-hair-bun-beard-683×1024.jpg
Maybe you’re fresh out of the corporate cubicle. Mommy has got you shaved from ear to ear and has you consistently home early, bitchwhipped and domesticated. Okay then GO MOHAWK. Go anything for that matter but a mohawk is conservative if you ask me. When the patriarchy comes to order and blows its horn, we’ll need ARMIES OF HAIRY MOTHERFUCKERS. But mohawk is a commendable start. Let’s see the HR bitches try and out-psyche a mohawk man. They take the other road and just get wet in their seats when they smell a patriarch man braving a mohawk. But it’s a start.
http://i1.wp.com/offbeatbride.com/files/2016/02/Beard_Fanckboner_Kates_Lens_Photography_KLPBonerWeddingTBL30of76_low.jpg?resize=400%2C600
2028 will be zooming in on us like a toboggan ride soon. BRING YOUR HAIR.
https://cdna2.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/002/459/258/small/kerem-beyit-rom-barbarian-rev.jpg?1461964125
(the Samson rule)
Who the fuck wants mittens ?…
He should have a 30 year beard down to his knees and he should have stuck with his first name ‘Willard’ (Willard Mitt Romney). With that shaved face and pussyfoot name he gets cucked out the ass. No bearded patriarch comes at you like this:
http://i49.tinypic.com/24ymv0o.jpg
This should be an article.
Everybody knows that the candidate with the best hair wins.
Bound?
You can’t turn this boat on a dime. To paraphrase Bezmenov “even if America started now, it would take at least 20 years to re-educate a new generation.”
You would have to shutdown the public schools or radically alter the curriculum.
Or slowly invade the curriculum in the same manner the marxists have. Fight fire with fire.
That’s the rub. How? God forbid any Ayn Rand ever (not the most perfect but that would be a good start). The whole public school institution is stuck on teaching BS like equality and voting is a right and other scripted nonsense. Colleges are even worse.
Do what the USSR did and spent 85% of a country’s espionage budget. Propaganda the hell out of traditionalism. Bing bam boom done.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2225ab8ff78546b686fdaad360ae6f48f6b554499ebca6f6aa6578281a97326b.jpg
The solution is obvious.
https://attendingtheworld.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/cartoon-hey-rabbi-whatcha-doing.jpg?w=240
Good piece. The mid 2000s hardly seem as long ago as they were and I share your sentiment about the role the Internet played in all of this. The left gets that too Obama has been full on attack against “fake” news and the freedom of our Internet.
My thoughts and prayers go to our brothers and sisters in France and Germany. I hope they are empowered by what’s happened in the UK and US. Hopefully they are next to buck the wicked and begin taking their countries back.
Test…
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1044fcf08623632b2dc903ba1cbc7e544788fc4511d3608890f23ab16a3d3c6c.jpg
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/FrontDeLaFoi.jpg
Ultimately it is my belief the only way the globalist overlords can be defeated is if the nations/people of the world reconsolidate and unite together to defeat them.
Traditionalist, ethnically conscious nations that wish to remain autonomous, respecting and fostering trade with different but alike nations scares the absolute shit out of the Zionists.
When you accept the premises of Political Correctness by accepting their language and morality, you’ve already lost the battle.
Jordan Peterson is another example of someone fighting this SJW attack on the West.
The Political Correctness Game (SJW Game) – Jordan B. Peterson
http://i.imgur.com/RraXG7L.png
Pass it on.
Pepe = Pence ?
Nationalists and patriarchalists of the world unite.
To cut in more personally, I know of no genuine red-pilled or
Alt-Righter who would have rejected me as a frog, although I remember
some stars and stripes cucks blaming me for daring to speak about
American politics without owning a US passport.
I’m not one for calling names. But people do have a point, if you don’t have an American passport, why should we listen to you. It’s easy and cherry-pick what you read and hear about another country when you live on another continent, so long as if fits your agenda. I don’t know why anyone would listen to you. It’s like taking a parenting class, and finding out your teacher never had kids. Or me (a female) writing a book on how to be a man.
I’m French too and I don’t feel “offended” at all when Americans rightly point out how, for example, Paris is riddled with a mixture of no-go zones and wealthy gentrification. If you are on my side, then you are, no worries. The whole West is undergoing the same trends and problems. All Westerners with good intentions are in this together. If we get divided, we’ll be powerless again.
its just an example of an insane feminist attacking the messenger and ignoring the message -> their most used weapon – the ad hominum attack…mocking and shaming any that don’t toe the party line…
Whereas I’m open to listen to anyone’s opinion on problems with our western governments. We are all in it together against them…
Absolutely. I hope this wave spreads to your country as well. The regional elections last December were an absolute shit show.
AMEN to this article, it’s fantastic!
This battle is global, not local.
It has nothing to do with race or nations but everything to do with what is right and natural.
It’s a global cultural war and we should welcome any red-piller as a brother or sister regardless of background, color, sex, or religion and fight persistently as one, globally.
We should always bear in mind that our enemy would be more than happy to see us divided and fighting with each other about trivial issues. Let’s not fall into that trap.
Trump’s triumph obviously has been a landmark, a turning point in this war, ‘cos now we all can see it clearly that we red-pillers are stronger in numbers.
And not just in the USA but globally as well. Now it’s time to act, time to move forward and ride this wave of power, towards a freedom.
It’s so relieving to finally believe in humankind again, to know that we still have this will to survive as species after the suicidal direction we have been forced upon by the globalists.
We will be saved by the morally right and we will beat this sick trans-genderism which is all but leading us to an extinction in the end if we are to let that to nourish.
The U.S. election was a giant leap for a humankind indeed.
And hopefully in the near future we can see these last few decades as a modern day Dark Ages that will never ever see the light of the day again.
Bound, not binded.
I kept waiting for the author to name the Jew…
Dear Brothers, I think the author tried to mix up two or more issues into one article ! I am sure that some where deep in your hearts, you are not agreeing or fully agreeing with the author, at least on few issues he raised. I was happy when the author referred and addressed MEN (or White MEN) but soon the change in tone ! err ! I want to make my own observations, experiences and feelings.
First, I don’t buy the logic that Trump won the elections because he used “racism card” and/or his “anti immigration” stance. NO, that’s not the reason (although it might have had very little impact). The MAJOR reason is MEN unanimously supported him, regardless of the Party, Color, Race or Religion, plus a small percentage of “real” Women.
MEN in this Country are FED UP of the one-sided gender biased laws & legal system, educational system, media and entertainment. Every where MEN (and MASCULINITY) are/is laughed at, humiliated, insulted and belittled. I am a Immigrant and I supported Trump since the beginning, even though Trump was against (really ?) Immigration.
Trump himself is a successful Businessman and he is aware of the Positive contributions and Healthy competition of Immigration. He (and ALL of my Brothers) can clearly make the difference (in fact, this was reflected in his speeches) between Asylum seekers, Refugees, Illegal Migration VS Immigration.
The author says “we don’t pander to arrogant, aggressive anti-whites”. How about when someone puts that into something similar: “we don’t pander to arrogant, aggressive pro-whites” !? Guess what, NOBODY wants to pander to arrogant & aggressive “Any Body” !
Again, the author says “importing third-world immigration” ? Which part/country the author is referring to as third-world ? Are those the same countries which the English looted and massacred ?
Now coming to Racism, I don’t think there is anything called racism and I (living in Western since the past 12 years !) never ever faced racism. If at all anything I faced, that is “J.E.C” (Jealousy, Envy, Complex). That too very rarely and in that, most often from pussies and less often by MEN.
Yet again, “low-wage individuals” ? is it ? really ? This is a big topic but why we are ignoring the facts ? Government has strict rules, regulations and stringent requirements for Businesses when it comes to Employment. I don’t want to get into the (complicated) details; sure, waste of our precious time.
OK now, let’s not deviate from our path. Remember Brothers, femicunts will use the racism (which I never faced !) issue and will try their best to divide us, the MEN. Let’s strengthen our stand on the MALE dignity. Then, later, we have hope, scope and reach to deal with other issues; courtesy & credit goes to our President Mr. Donald Trump. Let’s celebrate this Thanks Giving day with Pride.
This article has a weird title. Shouldn’t it be “men are bound” ? At first glance I thought it said “blinded” or something and kept looking for something negative to come.
As a Muslim I agree with most of the views of this website. Because, for all it’s worth, it gives me hope and encouragement to work for my own country.